
Performance
The NAV total return was 12.7% in sterling terms over the
period with the share price total return at 13.6%. This
compared to the FTSE World Asia Pacific ex Japan Index,
which returned 14.1%, and the MSCI AC Asia Pacific ex
Japan High Dividend Yield Index, which returned 13.9% over
the period. The more growth oriented FTSE index
benefitted from its larger weighting in low yielding Taiwan
Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (‘TSMC’) and
China technology names Tencent, Alibaba and Xiaomi.
The MSCI index was a beneficiary of its traditionally large
weighting in Chinese financials. While the NAV total return
underperformed the two indices, the portfolio produced a
second consecutive year of double-digit NAV total return
as we shifted away from deep value high yield names
that would not have participated in recent market rallies
towards a delicate balance between high yield and high
growth names. We feel this approach has allowed us to
broadly match these growth indices, whilst providing a
significantly higher dividend yield.
In future, we will compare performance versus a single
index, the broader growth and more commonly used MSCI
AC Asia Pacific ex Japan Index as it better reflects our
recent shift towards a balanced growth and income
composition. This index returned 14.7% over the period,
supported by large weightings in the technology sector.
In local currency terms, the FTSE World Asia Pacific ex
Japan Index rose 18.5% with the 4.4% strength in sterling
impacting returns for the UK investor. China, Hong Kong,
South Korea and Taiwan posted strong performance,
however, underlying this were structural growth drivers
unique to each market. In China, we have mentioned the
great revival of technology names following positive news
flow on AI investments. Equally important, however, was
the performance of high dividend paying State Owned
Enterprises (‘SOEs’). Improving market sentiment especially
benefitted SOEs and domestic retail investors, and
insurance companies sought higher yielding domestic
equities in the face of falling interest rates. In Hong Kong
there was a rebound in the property market as HIBOR, the
interbank rate, fell dramatically and supported the
attractiveness of our high yield property and
telecommunication holdings. In Taiwan, the dominance of
AI related names such as TSMC, the global leader in
semiconductors, boosted performance as US tech giants
battled to invest ever increasing amounts into AI. Finally,
South Korea was a huge beneficiary of renewed corporate
reform under a recently elected president, with the market
up over 75% in US dollar terms by the end of October 2025.
India was the worst performer over the period, followed by
the ASEAN markets of Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines and
Thailand. Our exposure to these markets is limited, though
we continue to believe India and Indonesia are attractive
long term growth markets. Developments over the course
of the period have, though, led us to reduce our exposure
here. For India, a more positive outlook on private sector
capital expenditure, with improved inward foreign direct
investment and employment prospects is key. Indonesia
is enacting reform of its own, but some of the
communication has been less than clear and recent
unemployment and static growth has led to some
consumer backlash. We are inclined to give the
government the benefit of the doubt given some well-
planned initiatives to boost growth.
Our key contributors to performance were high yield value
companies in China which have been firmly out of fashion
for several years. An example is China Hongqiao, the
largest global aluminium manufacturer, which
appreciated by over 90% whilst paying a double-digit
dividend yield. Our China financial holdings, namely China
CITIC Bank, China Construction Bank and New China Life,
all performed well whilst paying high dividends. Alongside
this, we were able to utilise our option strategy to generate
income from strongly performing growth companies such
as SEA Limited, whose valuation nearly doubled. Quanta
Computer and TSMC were also strong contributors.
Volatility has allowed us to expand utilisation of our option
strategy, allowing us to purchase more of these exciting
growth companies whilst maintaining a high and growing
dividend per share.
Key performance detractors in the period were the
remaining positions in India and the energy sector,
despite our low positioning in these areas. Bharat
Petroleum, Woodside Energy and Infosys were
underperformers and were sold in the period. Power Grid
and GAIL in India were weak in the period, but we continue
to hold these companies as they increase their dividends
from high returns generated from key infrastructure
assets. The weaker macro data from Indonesia hurt the
performance of Bank Mandiri, another detractor over the
period. With Indian valuations now somewhat less
stretched, we remain alert to a return pivot to investments
in that important market.
Revenue
Dividend income from companies held in the portfolio fell
by 11.1% while total income decreased by 3.1% compared to
last year. This reflects a return to more normal revenues
following the exceptional increase in income last year.
Despite this, the year ended 31 August 2025 generated the
Company’s second highest revenue return per share ever
as dividend growth continues to surprise positively in our
region. Notably, the financial year just ended, has
produced a positive capital return per share for the first
time since 2017, evidence of our subtle shift toward
achieving capital upside along with high income.
Notably, the financial year just
ended, has produced a positive
capital return per share for the
first time since 2017, evidence of
our subtle shift toward
achieving capital upside along
with high income.
Fund Manager’s report continued
Strategic
report
Financial
statements
Additional
information
AGM Notice
Governance
Strategic
report
11
Henderson Far East Income Limited Annual Report 2025