page 32 Montanaro UK Smaller Companies Investment Trust PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2025
Corporate Governance Statement continued
INDEPENDENCE OF DIRECTORS AND TENURE
The Board has considered the independent status of each
Director under the AIC Code and has determined that all
Directors are independent.
In line with the 2019 AIC Code, the Company has adopted a
formal policy on tenure. The Board does not feel that it would
be appropriate to set a specific tenure limit for individual
Directors or the Chair of the Board or its Committees.
Instead, under normal circumstances, the Board members,
including the Chair, will be expected to serve a tenure of 9
years, thus preserving the cumulative valuable experience
and understanding of the Company, while benefitting from
fresh perspectives and helping to promote diversity. The
Board is of the view that length of service will not necessarily
compromise the independence or contribution of Directors of
an investment trust company where continuity and experience
can significantly add to the strength of the Board.
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
An annual review of the performance of the Board, its
Committees and individual Directors is undertaken by
the Directors. The Board evaluation process comprises a
detailed questionnaire which assesses the performance
and effectiveness of the Board and each of its Committees.
The objective of the evaluation is to obtain constructive
feedback to improve the Board’s effectiveness by highlighting
individual and collective strengths as well as development
areas. Arthur Copple, as Chairman, takes overall responsibility
for the evaluation process and has selected a questionnaire
methodology to achieve these objectives. This is followed
by a feedback session that assesses the effectiveness of the
process, identifying any areas for improvement. The appraisal
of the Chairman is led by the Senior Independent Director.
Following review of the Directors’ time commitment and
duties, and their contributions and attendance at all Board
and Committee meetings and discussions held outside
these formal meetings, the Board believes that each Director
continues to be effective and demonstrates the necessary
commitment to the role.
The Board considers that outside commitments have not
impacted on their duties as Directors and have enhanced the
knowledge brought to the Board meetings.
The results of the Board evaluation process were reviewed
and discussed by the Board. Following evaluation, the
Board concluded that it had the appropriate balance of
skills, experience, and knowledge and that the Board and its
Committees continued to operate effectively.
No other areas of particular significance or concern were
identified in the performance evaluation. The Board
considered whether an external performance evaluation
should be undertaken in the future and notes that this is
not a requirement under the AIC Code given the Company is
outside of the FTSE 350. The Board has taken into account the
costs and benefits associated with such an exercise and does
not consider the use of external consultants to conduct this
evaluation is likely to provide any meaningful advantage over
the process that has been adopted. However, the option of
doing so will be regularly reviewed.
RE-ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Under the provisions of the Company’s Articles, the Directors
retire by rotation at least every three years. However, in
accordance with corporate governance best practice as set out
in the AIC Code, all Directors should put themselves forward
for re-election every year. As such, each of the Directors is
subject to annual re-election by the shareholders at the Annual
General Meeting. All Directors have confirmed that they will
be standing for re-election at the forthcoming Annual General
Meeting.
INTERNAL CONTROL AND FINANCIAL REPORTING
The Board has delegated responsibility to the Audit and
Management Engagement Committee for establishing and
maintaining the Company’s risk management and internal
control processes and for monitoring their effectiveness.
Internal control systems are designed to meet the Company’s
particular needs and the risks to which it is exposed and
by their very nature provide reasonable but not absolute
assurance against misstatement or loss. The Directors have
reviewed the effectiveness of the system of internal controls,
including financial, operational and compliance controls and
risk management. The Committee will take actions to remedy
any significant failings or weaknesses identified or make
recommendations to the Board, as appropriate. Information
about the Company’s financial risk management objectives
and policies is set out in Note 15 of the financial statements
on pages 60 to 62. The key procedures that have been
established to provide effective internal controls are as follows:
•
throughout the year under review and up to the date of
this Annual Report, there has been an ongoing process
for identifying, evaluating and managing the principal risks
faced by MUSCIT, which complies with guidance supplied
by the FRC on risk management, internal control and
related financial and business reporting. This is reviewed
on a regular basis by the Audit and Management
Engagement Committee, on behalf of the Board. Details
of the principal and emerging risks are set out on pages
17 to 20. The process involves reports from MUSCIT’s
Company Secretary and Manager as described below.
In addition, the Audit and Management Engagement
Committee receives internal control reports from all the
third parties to which the Company delegates functions;