
FAIR, BALANCED AND
UNDERSTANDABLE
The Committee carried out a
thorough review of the Group’s Annual
Report and Accounts. The Committee
gave particular consideration to
whether the Annual Report and
Accounts, taken as a whole, was
fair, balanced and understandable,
concluding it was.
To make this assessment, the
Committee received copies of
the Annual Report and financial
statements to review during the
drafting process, to ensure that
the key messages being followed
aligned with the Company’s position,
performance and strategy being
pursued and that the narrative
sections of the Annual Report
were consistent with the financial
statements. After consideration of all
of this information, we are satisfied
that, when taken as a whole, the 2021
Annual Report and Accounts is fair,
balanced and understandable, and
provides the information necessary
for Shareholders to assess the
Group’s performance, business model
and strategy.
GOING CONCERN AND
VIABILITY REVIEW
The Committee reviewed
management’s approach to the Going
Concern and Viability statement prior
to the year end and agreed that a
three-year horizon was appropriate
for viability reporting. After the
year end, the Committee reviewed
management’s reports setting out
its view of the Group’s viability
including a description of the factors
considered in forming an assessment
of the Group’s prospects. The viability
review was based on the Group’s
three-year strategic plan and an
analysis of the impact of the principal
risks relating to product demand
decline risk, technology security
and resilience risk, external parties
dependency risk, physical security
risk and climate change risk.
Having considered management’s
assessment, the Committee approved
the Going Concern statement set
out on page 58 and the Viability
statement set out on pages 56 to 58.
RISK AND INTERNAL
CONTROLS
The key elements of the Group’s
internal-control framework and
procedures are set out on pages 48
to 54. The principal risks the Group
faces are set out on pages 49 to 54.
The Committee devoted part of each
meeting to items concerning risk and
its management.
The Executive Committee has
established a sub-committee, the
Business Assurance Committee.
The sub-committee reports to the
Executive Committee and also has
a separate reporting line directly to
the Audit and Risk Committee where
the Chair of the Business Assurance
Committee presents updates.
The executive sub-committee
coordinates the governance, risk and
controls at the Group before reporting
to the Committee and the Board.
During late 2021 and early 2022, the
Committee reviewed risk registers
and management’s updated risk
appetite statements ahead of Board
discussions to approve the Group’s
final risk appetite statements. The
Committee requested an independent
review into the design and operating
effectiveness of the risk management
framework to be conducted in 2022.
COMPLIANCE
Prior to year end, the Committee
reviewed its assurance arrangements
covering legal, financial, tax, risk, IT
and cyber, and employment policies,
identified areas where additional
assurance on Group compliance with
these policies and procedures was
required and agreed actions with
management to obtain the desired
level of assurance.
EFFECTIVENESS OF
EXTERNAL AUDIT
The Committee, on behalf of the Board,
is responsible for the relationship with
the Auditor, and part of that role is
to examine the effectiveness of the
statutory audit process. Audit quality
is regarded by the Committee as the
principal requirement of the annual
audit process.
The effectiveness of the external
audit process depends on appropriate
risk identification. In December, the
Committee discussed the Auditor’s
plan for the 2021 audit. This included
a summary of the proposed audit
scope and a summary of what the
Auditor considered to be the most
significant financial reporting risks
facing the Group, together with the
Auditor’s proposed audit approach to
these significant risks. In March, the
Auditor reported against their audit
scope, providing an opportunity for the
Committee to monitor progress and
raise questions, and challenge both the
Auditor and management.
The auditor meets management at
regular intervals during the annual
audit process.
The Committee will formally review
the effectiveness of the 2021 external
audit during the first half of 2022.
AUDITOR INDEPENDENCE
The Committee keeps under review
the cost-effectiveness, independence
and objectivity of the External
Auditor. The Committee has put in
place a policy on the engagement of
the External Auditor to supply non-
audit services and a review of the
effectiveness of the External Auditor.
In assessing the independence of
the Auditor from the Group, the
Committee takes into account the
information and assurances provided
by the Auditor, confirming that all its
partners and staff involved with the
audit are independent of any links to
the Group. PwC confirmed that all its
partners and staff complied with their
ethics and independence policies and
procedures, which are fully consistent
with the FRC’s Ethical Standard,
including that none of its employees
working on the audit hold any shares
in W.A.G payment solutions plc.
PwC has audited the Group since
2019 and the lead audit partner
rotates every five years to assure
independence. PwC, Deloitte and
former external auditor EY took part
in 2019 audit tender process. PwC
and EY were shortlisted and PwC was
later selected as an external auditor
for the Group. Mr Mark Skedgel
became lead partner in late 2021,
responsible for the Group’s statutory
audit for the 2021 year end onwards.
The Committee has no current plans
to re-tender the audit.
The Committee is satisfied that PwC
continues to be independent, and
free from any conflicting interest with
the Group.
Annual Report and Accounts EUROWAG
117
GOVERNANCE