BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022

Keeping in touch We know how important it is to receive up-to-date information about the Company. To ensure that you are kept up-to-date, please scan the QR code to the right of this page to visit our website. If you have a smartphone, you can activate the QR code by opening the camera on your device and pointing it at the QR code. This will then open a link on the relevant section on the Company’s website. By visiting our website, you will have the opportunity to sign up to our monthly newsletter which includes our latest factsheets and market commentary, as well as upcoming events and webinars. Information about how we process personal data is contained in our privacy policy available on our website. General enquiries about the Company should be directed to the Company Secretary at: cosec@blackrock.com Use the QR code above to take you to the Company’s website where you can sign up to monthly insights and factsheets. Register here to watch this year’s Annual General Meeting For the benefit of shareholders who are unable to attend this year’s AGM in person, we have arranged for the proceedings to be viewed via a webinar. You can register to watch the AGM by scanning the QR Code opposite or by visiting our website at www.blackrock.com/uk/thrg and clicking the registration banner. Please note that it is not possible to speak or vote at the AGM via this medium and joining the webinar does not constitute attendance at the AGM. Shareholders wishing to exercise their right to attend, speak and vote at the AGM should either attend in person or exercise their right to appoint a proxy to do so on their behalf. For further details please see page 10 of the Annual Report.

Financial highlights for the year ended 30 November 2022 595.00p 1 Ordinary share price -35.5% 2,3 626.10p NAV per ordinary share -31.1 2,3 £633.4m Net assets -32.3% 11.10p Total dividends +5.7% 12.95p Revenue earnings per share +6.6% NAV per share underperformed Benchmark Index 4 by 13.6 percentage points 3,5 Share price underperformed Benchmark Index 4 by 18.0 percentage points 3 Percentage comparisons are year-on-year against 30 November 2021. ¹ Mid-market. ² Share price and NAV performance are calculated in Sterling terms with dividends reinvested. ³ Alternative Performance Measures. See Glossary on pages 131 to 133. 4 The Company uses the Numis Smaller Companies plus AIM (excluding Investment Companies) Index as its Benchmark Index. 5 Calculated on NAV per ordinary share performance versus the Benchmark Index performance, both in Sterling terms with dividends reinvested. Section 1: Overview and performance 1 “onshoring”, potential for increased industrial spend as global companies seek to diversify away from China & Taiwan / niche industrials in the UK mid market.

2 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 A member of the Association of Investment Companies Further details about the Company, including the latest annual and half yearly financial reports, fact sheets and stock exchange announcements, are available on the website at blackrock.com/uk/thrg Why BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc? Investment objective The Company’s objective is to provide shareholders with long term capital growth and an attractive total return through investment primarily in UK smaller and mid-capitalisation companies traded on the London Stock Exchange. Reasons to invest Outperforming asset class The Company offers investors exposure to primarily UK smaller and mid- capitalisation companies, an asset class that has historically outperformed larger companies by 4% 1 per annum. Active management Smaller and mid-capitalisation companies operate in a less efficient and under-researched area of the market, which makes it an attractive environment for active managers. Additional alpha opportunities We are able to increase our long exposure where we see opportunity, and can also short companies that we find unattractive, enabling the Company to profit if their share prices rise or fall in each case. This provides a differentiated source of potential alpha. Flexible market exposure The Company has an enhanced toolkit for generating outperformance. Leverage enables us to increase overall gross market exposure whilst varying the net exposure through time, with the aim of enhancing returns over the long term. Broader exposure The Company is able to invest without restriction in AIM listed companies, has the ability to invest 15% of gross assets in companies listed overseas and 2.5% of net assets in unquoted companies. This further expands our investment universe and provides differentiation from other trusts in the market. Proven track record Proven strategy with a long term track record of over 4.5% annualised outperformance over our Benchmark Index. 2 1 Source: Datastream. For the period 1955 to 2022, Numis Smaller Companies Index plus AIM (excluding Investment Companies) Total Return Index (previously known as Hoare Govett). Barclays Equity Total Return (December 1955 to December 2006), representative of smaller company performance. FTSE All-Share Total Return (January 2008 to May 2022), representative of larger company performance. 2 Since BlackRock was appointed as Manager on 1 July 2008.

Section 1: Overview and performance 3 Contents Section 1: Overview and performance Financial highlights 1 Why BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc? 2 Performance record 4 Ten year record 5 Chairman’s statement 6 Investment Manager’s report 13 Section 2: Portfolio Portfolio of investments 21 Fair value and gross market exposure of investments 26 Distribution of investments 27 Section 3: Governance Governance structure 32 Directors’ biographies 33 Strategic report 37 Responsible ownership: BlackRock’s approach to sustainable investing 52 Directors’ report 54 Corporate governance statement 63 Report of the remuneration committee 69 Directors’ remuneration policy 73 Report of the Audit Committee 75 Statement of Directors’ responsibilities in respect of the Annual Report and Financial Statements 79 Section 4: Financial Statements Independent Auditor’s Report 82 Statement of Comprehensive Income 88 Statement of Changes in Equity 89 Statement of Financial Position 90 Cash Flow Statement 91 Notes to the Financial Statements 92 Section 5: Additional information Shareholder information 120 Analysis of ordinary shareholders 123 Management and other service providers 124 AIFM Report on Remuneration (unaudited) 125 Other AIFMD disclosures (unaudited) 129 Information to be disclosed in accordance with Listing Rule 9.8.4 130 Glossary 131 Section 6: Annual general meeting Notice of annual general meeting 136 Share fraud warning 140

4 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 Performance record As at 30 November 2022 As at 30 November 2021 Net assets (£’000) 1 633,357 935,148 Net asset value per ordinary share (pence) 626.10 921.91 Ordinary share price (mid-market) (pence) 595.00 935.00 Benchmark Index 2 15,652.96 18,968.77 (Discount)/premium to cum income net asset value 3 (5.0)% 1.4% Average (discount)/premium to cum income net asset value for the year 3 (3.5)% 1.2% Performance (with dividends reinvested) Net asset value per share 3 (31.1)% 37.0% Ordinary share price 3 (35.5)% 38.8% Benchmark Index 2 (17.5)% 24.5% For the year ended 30 November 2022 For the year ended 30 November 2021 Change % Revenue Net revenue profit after taxation (£’000) 13,257 11,446 +15.8% Revenue earnings per ordinary share (pence) 4 12.95 12.15 +6.6% Dividends per ordinary share (pence) Interim 2.60 2.50 +4.0% Final 8.50 8.00 +6.3% Total dividends paid and payable 11.10 10.50 +5.7% -45 -30 -15 0 15 30 45 Benchmark Index 5 Ordinary share price (mid-market) NAV per share Annual performance figures to 30 November change %, calculated in Sterling terms with dividends reinvested. Sources: BlackRock and Datastream. (31.1) (2.7) (9.0) 1.8 8.2 (17.5) 42.8 9.1 3.8 37.0 24.5 38.8 (35.5) 24.4 8.0 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 % Annual performance for the five years to 30 November 2022 5 The Company’s Benchmark Index is the Numis Smaller Companies plus AIM (excluding Investment Companies) Index. With effect from 22 March 2018, the Numis Smaller Companies plus AIM (excluding Investment Companies) Index replaced the Numis Smaller Companies excluding AIM (excluding Investment Companies) Index as the Company’s Benchmark Index. From 1 December 2013 to 21 March 2018, the Company’s Benchmark Index was the Numis Smaller Companies excluding AIM (excluding Investment Companies) Index. Prior to 1 December 2013, the Company’s Benchmark Index was the Numis Smaller Companies plus AIM (excluding Investment Companies) Index. The performance of the Benchmark Indices during these periods has been blended to reflect these changes. 1 The change in net assets reflects portfolio movements, dividends paid, share issues and share buybacks during the year. 2 The Company’s Benchmark Index is the Numis Smaller Companies plus AIM (excluding Investment Companies) Index. 3 Alternative Performance Measures, see Glossary on pages 131 to 133. 4 Further details are given in the Glossary on page 133.

1 Mid-market price. 2 Alternative Performance Measures, see Glossary on pages 131 to 133. Equity shareholders’ funds (£m) 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 240.8 235.5 286.3 301.5 396.8 379.6 470.1 596.2 935.1 633.4 626.1 329.2 322.0 391.6 412.3 542.7 519.1 634.1 681.2 921.9 NAV per share (p) 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 Ordinary share price per share¹ (p) 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 290.0 270.0 339.5 325.0 457.5 457.0 640.0 682.0 935.0 595.0 (11.9) (5.0) (16.1) (13.3) (21.2) (15.7) (12.0) 0.9 1.4 0.1 Share price (discount)/premium to NAV² (%) 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 10.2% Compound annual growth rate over the ten year period Net revenue profit after taxation (£m) 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 13.3 3.7 3.8 5.9 5.7 7.4 8.1 6.3 5.4 11.4 12.95 4.99 5.19 8.08 7.83 10.11 11.02 8.56 6.57 12.15 Revenue return per ordinary share (p) 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 13.5% Compound annual growth rate over the ten year period Dividends per share (p) 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 11.10 4.00 4.40 6.70 7.50 9.00 10.00 10.20 +40.1 -1.1 +23.2 +7.3 +33.9 +37.0 -2.7 -31.1 +24.4 +9.1 Change in NAV per share (with dividends reinvested)² (%) 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 12.8% Compound annual growth rate over the ten year period 11.9% Compound annual growth rate over the ten year period 10.20 10.50 Section 1: Overview and performance 5 Ten year record

6 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 Chairman’s statement Overview In the Half Yearly Report, the Board recognised that it had been a particularly challenging period, the NAV having underperformed the benchmark by 16.9 percentage points over the six months to 31 May 2022. Our Manager’s growth style remained firmly out of favour throughout as investors switched allocations from strongly performing growth companies into energy, lower growth value and defensive stocks. The market rotation witnessed in the first quarter of 2022 therefore saw many of our high-quality growth portfolio holdings de-rate sharply and in many cases, with no material change in the investment thesis, trading or outlook. However, the Company has had a stronger second half of the financial year, regaining some ground and outperforming the index by 2.4 percentage points. This meant the full year result was largely a product of the underperformance seen in the first six months of the year. For the year to 30 November 2022, the Company’s NAV underperformed the benchmark by 13.6 percentage points. Market background In my report to shareholders this time last year, the UK had led the developed world with a successful vaccine roll- out and there was, to some extent, a degree of optimism as the spectre of COVID-19 dissipated and economic activity returned to more normal levels. However, although the uncertainty caused by COVID-19 related lockdowns had been removed, there were indications that there had been more longer-term structural damage to the UK economy. This damage became evident as companies reported supply chain bottle necks, labour shortages and rising operating costs, which were either absorbed, or in many cases, passed onto the consumer. As the UK economy struggled with the challenge of transitioning from a COVID-19 driven demand for goods over services model, to a more balanced goods and services- based economy, this supply pressure inevitably led to rising prices and in turn rising inflation. These inflationary forces were then exacerbated by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in early 2022, triggering an energy supply shock, with Europe being hit hardest given its reliance on Russian gas. The resultant spike in wholesale energy prices, coupled with price hikes for agricultural commodities, pushed up the cost of many food staples, driving up two of the key elements of inflation to levels not seen in over 40 years. The Year’s highlights • NAV underperformed the Benchmark Index over one year by 13.6 percentage points; • Share price underperformed the Benchmark Index over one year by 18.0 percentage points; • Stronger NAV performance in the six months to 30 November 2022, outperforming the Benchmark Index by 2.4 percentage points; • 1,773,900 new shares were issued for a total consideration of £16,550,000 and 2,051,000 ordinary shares were bought back into treasury for a total consideration of £11,544,000, helping to reduce the volatility of the Company’s share rating; • Share Price has remained close to NAV through most of a challenging year, trading at an average discount of -3.5%; and • Final dividend declared of 8.50p per share (2021: 8.00p) (All returns are in Sterling terms with dividends reinvested.) Christopher Samuel Chairman

Section 1: Overview and performance 7 notion of ‘transitionary inflation’ was now firmly discredited and inflation not only persisted but continued to rise unabated throughout the financial year. At the time of writing UK inflation, as measured by the Consumer Price Index, is at 10.5%, having peaked at 11.1% in October 2022. The Bank of England took decisive action to combat soaring inflation by reiterating its commitment to the 2% inflation target “at all costs” and implemented tighter monetary policy through several interest rate hikes during the year. Similar action was seen globally, as central banks sought to unwind decades of accommodating monetary policy resulting in excess market liquidity which has acted to stoke inflation. However, this action has negatively impacted UK growth forecasts and raised the likelihood of a more prolonged economic recession. The stock market responded by adjusting valuations downward to reflect this more challenging economic back drop and the compounding effect of a weakening pound, higher input costs and rising wages on corporate profit margins. This downward revaluation was particularly acute in the high-quality growth stocks within our portfolio, and many were materially re-rated, despite posting strong results and material trading updates. Performance The Board has been in close dialogue with our investment manager, Dan Whitestone, throughout the year. He has approached this challenging backdrop by reducing gearing in the portfolio, while continuing to focus on the high quality, financially strong, highly profitable, cash generative growth companies that can weather the storm and deliver for shareholders over the longer term. Over the twelve months to 30 November 2022, the Company’s NAV returned -31.1%, compared with a total return of -17.5% from the Company’s Benchmark Index, the Numis Smaller Companies plus AIM (excluding Investment Companies) Index, an underperformance of 13.6 percentage points. At the share price level, the return was -35.5%, resulting in an underperformance against the benchmark index of 18.0 percentage points during the year as the Company’s discount to NAV moved from a premium of 1.4% at the start of the financial year to a discount of 5.0% at the period end. This underperformance of the Benchmark Index will be very disappointing for shareholders but the Board is reassured by a stronger second half of the year in which our portfolio manager recouped some -40 -20 0 20 40 60 1 Year change % Performance record to 30 November 2022 (with dividends reinvested) NAV per share Share price Benchmark Index 3 Year change % 5 Year change % % 40.9 -3.1 -35.5 24.7 3.0 -31.1 4.8 6.7 -17.5

8 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 of the underperformance versus our benchmark index, outperforming the index by 2.4 percentage points. Moreover, as you will read in the Investment Manager’s report which follows, our portfolio manager is firmly of the view that the share price weakness experienced in the portfolio is not reflective of a material deterioration in the investment case for the stocks but a reflection of the market turbulence of 2022, where companies with higher growth prospects and more expensive valuations fell harder. This weak one year return should also be viewed in the context of strong results last year, with the Company returning +37.0%, and the longer- term performance delivered by the Company. Our NAV return has underperformed the Benchmark Index by -3.7% over three years, outperformed by 19.9% over five years and by 108.3% over ten years. The share price underperformed the Benchmark Index by -9.8% over three years, outperformed by 36.1% over five years and 166.2% over ten years. (All percentages calculated in Sterling terms with dividends reinvested.) As at close of business on 7 February 2023, the Company’s NAV had increased by 6.0%, compared to the Benchmark Index which increased by 3.7%. The share price over the same period increased by 9.2%. Further information on portfolio performance, positioning and the outlook for the forthcoming year can be found in the Investment Manager’s report on pages 13 to 17. I would like to take this opportunity to assure shareholders that although our full year results have been disappointing, both the Board and our Manager remain focused on achieving the Company’s objectives of providing shareholders with long-term capital growth and an attractive total return and remain confident in the investment approach and process. We thank shareholders for your loyalty and support. Policy on share price discount/premium We recognise that a widening of, and volatility in, the Company’s discount is viewed by some investors as a key disadvantage of investment trusts. The Board believes that the best way to address any discount over the longer term is to generate good performance and to create demand for the Company’s shares in the secondary market through effective marketing to drive awareness of the Company’s unique structure, robust investment process and long term investment track record in an attractive sector that is difficult to navigate. In support of this activity, and where deemed to be in shareholders’ long- term interests, the Board may exercise its powers to issue or buy back shares with the objective of ensuring that neither an excessive discount or premium to NAV arises. The Board considers several factors in determining whether the discount or premium to NAV at which the Company’s shares trade is excessive or otherwise. These may include but are not limited to: whether the share rating is commensurate with the peer group of UK Smaller Companies and whether the Company’s shares are trading in normal market conditions; the ongoing attractiveness of the investment proposition, in particular the strength of the portfolio management team and process; and the strong long- term performance delivered for shareholders, both in absolute and relative terms. Chairman’s statement continued

Section 1: Overview and performance 9 Share issuance and buy back activity During the year to 30 November 2022 the Company’s share rating ranged between a discount to NAV of 14.3% and a premium to NAV of 2.7% and ended the year at a discount of 5.0% (30 November 2021: premium of 1.4%). The 12-month average discount as at 30 November 2022 was 3.5% (average premium 2021: 1.2%). During the first three months of the financial year, the Company issued a total of 1,773,900 new shares in response to market demand (2021: 13,917,035), for a total consideration of £16,550,000 including costs. As the UK equity market declined after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the Company’s share rating moved from a premium to a discount to NAV and continued to widen. Following consultation with the Manager and the Company’s corporate broker, the Board determined that it was in shareholders’ interests to buy back shares with the objective of ensuring that an excessive discount to NAV did not arise. The Company subsequently bought back a total of 2,051,000 ordinary shares for a total consideration of £11,757,360. All shares were bought back at a discount to the prevailing NAV, were therefore accretive to existing shareholders, and were placed into Treasury for future re-issue. Since 30 November 2022 and up to the latest practicable date of 7 February 2023, a further 45,000 shares have been bought back for a total consideration of £276,000. As at this date, the Company’s shares were trading at a discount of 2.0%. Despite what has been a challenging and volatile year, it is pleasing that the Company’s share rating has been relatively stable and has traded within a fairly tight range for most of the year. The Board believes that the issuance and buy back activity undertaken has been beneficial in reducing the volatility of our share rating and has been in shareholders’ interest. As set out in the most recent Annual and Half Yearly reports, the extent and speed of further share issuance, especially given the recent volatility in markets, will be kept under review and there can therefore be no certainty that issuance will continue at the same level as it has in the past. As it does each year, the Board will once again seek at the Company’s Annual General Meeting (AGM) to renew the authorities granted by shareholders to issue or buy back shares. We encourage shareholders to vote in favour of these resolutions which are described in more detail in the Director’s Report on pages 60 to 62. Revenue return and dividends The revenue return per share for the year amounted to 12.95 pence per share, compared with 12.15 pence per share for the previous year. The Board recognises that, although the Company’s objective is capital growth, shareholders value consistency in the dividends paid by the Company; the Directors are therefore pleased to declare a proposed final dividend of 8.50 pence per share for the year ended 30 November 2022 (2021: 8.00p). This, together with the interim dividend of 2.60 pence per share paid on 26 August 2022, would give a total dividend for the year of 11.10 pence per share, increasing the total dividend distributed to shareholders in the prior financial year. This dividend will be paid on 31 March 2023, subject to shareholder approval at the forthcoming AGM, to shareholders on the Company’s register on 24 February 2023. Corporate Governance Matters As I mentioned in my Chairman’s statement in the Half Yearly Report, the Board recognises the benefits of diversity, including that of ethnicity, and in 2022 has complied with the Parker Review recommendation that FTSE 350 companies have at least one director from an ethnically diverse background by 2024. The Board has also considered the recommendations of the BEIS- sponsored FTSE Women Leaders Review. The review set new targets for FTSE 350 companies which are designed to achieve boards with 40% female representation (previously 33%) and at least one woman in the role of Chair or Senior Independent Director on the board by the end of 2025. I am pleased to report that the Board is now fully compliant with the recommendations of the Parker Review and the FTSE Women Leaders Review and following the conclusion of the AGM will have a 50:50 gender ratio. For the first time this year, we have also disclosed, amongst other data, the ethnicity of the Board. The disclosure can be found on page 64. As it does each year, and as required by the Corporate Governance Code, the Company undertook a comprehensive external Board evaluation this year. This resulted in a small number of proposals that the Company will adopt, notwithstanding that the overall conclusion was very positive in terms of the effectiveness of the Board, the skills, expertise and commitment of the Directors. The combination of our succession plan and structured search and selection process through which the Board identifies new appointments to the Board and the annual Board evaluation of their ongoing performance means that the Board remains confident that each Director is effectively discharging their role. “ We continue to focus on the high-quality, financially strong, highly profitable, cash generative growth companies that can weather the storm and deliver for shareholders over the longer term. ”

10 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 The Board is also cognisant of the concept of “overboarding” and has considered the time commitment required by the Directors’ other roles, taking into account their nature and complexity. The Board reviews this information annually, for each Director, including my own as Chairman of the Board, to ensure that all Directors have sufficient capacity to carry out their role effectively. Before recommending a Director for re-election, their independence, attendance record and ongoing commitment to the affairs of the Company is also considered. A formal evaluation of the performance of the Board is also carried out each year, assisted by an external third party firm. Further information on the evaluation of the performance of the Board can be found on page 65. Board composition and Diversity The Board regularly considers its composition and that of its committees and has an ongoing succession plan in place designed to ensure that it retains an appropriate balance of skills, knowledge, experience, independence and diversity that meets or exceeds relevant best practice and the requirements of the UK Corporate Governance Code, including guidance on tenure and the composition of the Board’s committees. In accordance with the Board’s succession plan, and to continue to ensure we retain the experience, expertise and diversity that is expected of a company in the FTSE 250, the Board, through its Nomination Committee, agreed a search process to identify a new director using a third-party recruitment firm, Fletcher Jones. The Nomination Committee determined the selection criteria, the method of selection, and the recruitment and appointment process. Board diversity, including that of age, ethnicity and gender, was taken into account when establishing the search criteria and candidate profile. Following the completion of a thorough search and selection process, which identified several very high calibre candidates, I am delighted to welcome Glen Suarez to the Board. Glen was appointed on 9 January 2023 and brings a wealth of relevant industry knowledge and experience. He is a highly experienced Non-executive Director and Chairman and his appointment further strengthens and diversifies the existing board. Glen will also serve on the Company’s Audit, Nomination, Remuneration and Management Engagement Committees, and his appointment is subject to approval by shareholders at the forthcoming AGM. Further details of Glen’s background and experience, and that of all the Directors, can be found in their biographies on pages 33 to 36. The Board’s policy on Board diversity and associated data can be found in the Corporate Governance Statement on page 64. Following nine years of diligent service on the Board, and having also chaired the Company’s Audit Committee during his tenure, Loudon Greenlees has advised the Board he will step down as a Director of the Company at the conclusion of the forthcoming AGM. I would like to take this opportunity to thank Loudon for his invaluable contribution to the ongoing success of the Company, his wise counsel during his tenure, and in particular for his leadership of the Company’s Audit Committee, an important and demanding role which he has discharged to great effect over many years. In preparation for Loudon’s departure, the Board, through its Nomination Committee, has appointed Angela Lane as his successor and she will take on the role from the conclusion of the AGM. Angela is both an experienced Non-executive Director and Audit Committee Chairman. She has recent and relevant experience and is a Chartered Accountant. As a result, Angela stood down as Chairman of the Company’s Remuneration Committee and was succeeded in this role by Nigel Burton with effect from 1 December 2022. At the time of writing, and to facilitate an orderly transition, the Board consists of seven independent Non- executive Directors, a higher number than usual. This will reduce to six following Loudon’s retirement at the AGM. The Board will continue to keep its composition under close review. Our approach to Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) integration Consideration of material ESG issues is built into our Manager’s investment process and climate risk is considered to be a key part of investment risk, an approach your Board supports. The style of our investment manager naturally steers away from companies with weak balance sheets and poor cash flow which is a common characteristic of the few resource stocks in the benchmark index. It should be noted that the Company does not have an explicit mandate for sustainable, ESG or impact-focused investment, nor has it adopted exclusionary screens. The investment manager’s integration of ESG factors into his analysis is, though, an important lens through which to identify long term winners, just as poor ESG outcomes provide a useful tool in establishing candidates for the short book. Further information on the Manager's approach to responsible investing can be found on page 52. Annual General Meeting The Board is pleased to announce that the Company’s Annual General Meeting (AGM) will be held in person on Thursday, 23 March 2023 at 12.00 p.m. at the offices of BlackRock at 12 Throgmorton Avenue, London, EC2N 2DL. Details of the business of the meeting are set out in the Notice of Annual General Meeting on pages 136 to 139 of this Annual Report. Prior to the formal business of the meeting, our Investment Manager will make a presentation to shareholders. This will be followed by a question and answer session. Shareholders who are unable to attend the meeting in person but who wish to Chairman’s statement continued

Section 1: Overview and performance 11 follow the AGM proceedings can do so via a live webinar this year. Details on how to register, together with access details, will be available shortly on the Company’s website at: www.blackrock. com/uk/thrg or by contacting the Company Secretary at cosec@ blackrock.com. It is not possible to attend, speak or vote via this medium and it is solely intended to provide shareholders with the ability to watch the proceedings. Nevertheless, I trust shareholders will find this new facility helpful. Additionally, if you are unable to attend you can exercise your right to vote by proxy or appoint a proxy to attend in your place. Details of how to do this are included on the AGM Proxy Card provided to shareholders with the annual report. If you hold your shares through a platform or nominees, you will need to contact them and ask them to appoint you as a proxy in respect of your shares in order to attend, speak and vote at the AGM. Further information on the business of this year's AGM can be found in the Notice of the AGM on pages 136 to 139. Shareholder communication We appreciate how important access to regular information is to our shareholders. To supplement our Company website, we now therefore offer shareholders the ability to sign up to the Trust Matters newsletter which includes information on the Company as well as news, views and insights on the investment trust market. Information on how to sign up is included on the inside front cover of this report. As I did last year, and in the interest of fostering greater shareholder engagement and participation, I have sought to engage with shareholders who hold their shares through an intermediary or platform via the provisions of section 793 of the Companies Act 2006 and encouraged them to either attend the AGM or exercise their right to vote by proxy. I understand that certain retail platforms are now providing shareholders with the ability to vote electronically. The Board encourages all shareholders to exercise their vote. Outlook As we move into 2023, the Board shares our investment manager’s view that company specifics and the strong trading reported by many of the constituents of our portfolio can triumph over the macroeconomic malaise currently weighing heavily on UK smaller company valuations and growth stocks in particular. He continues to believe that we will, in time, see a return to the strong and consistent investment performance delivered to shareholders over many years. Our investment manager’s fundamental philosophy remains unchanged, with a continued focus on financially strong companies with innovative and disruptive business models and differentiated offerings which are capable of delivering sustained growth over time. This approach has served the Company well over many years and the Board remains fully supportive of our investment manager. CHRISTOPHER SAMUEL Chairman 9 February 2023 “Our investment manager’s fundamental philosophy remains unchanged, with a continued focus on financially strong companies with innovative and disruptive business models and differentiated offerings which are capable of delivering sustained growth over time. ”

Section 1: Overview and performance 13 Investment Manager’s report For the 12 months ended 30 November 2022 Market review and overall investment performance The past 12 months has been a period characterised by steep market declines and high levels of volatility across many asset classes globally. The notable exception was the FTSE 100 Index which managed a gain of 11.3% in the 12 month period to the end of November 2022. The FTSE 250 Index fell by -12.5% on a total return basis and the Company’s benchmark, the Numis Smaller Companies plus AIM (excluding Investment Companies) Index fell by -17.5% during this period. As discussed in the Half Yearly Report, the first half of the year saw the UK stock market rotating away from highly priced ‘growth’ shares towards lower growth ‘value’ and defensives. This was driven by concerns of higher inflation and energy supply shocks exacerbated by the war in Ukraine. In the second half of the year the subsequent response by central bankers to raise interest rates stoked fears of a recession and markets declined further. As concerns around economic growth grew, UK small and mid-caps mirrored their US peers and performed poorly (down by -9.4%) to 31 May 2022. These sections of the market are perceived to be more cyclical and discretionary and were sold off to fund more ‘defensive’ positions. Within the UK equity market, the effect of this can be seen in the gap between the performance year-to-date of the FTSE 100 Index (make up is over 50% in resources, staples and healthcare) and the FTSE 250 Index highlighted above and which is the largest dispersion on record. These numbers should give some measure of the extremes of positioning caused by the events of the past 12 months. The UK also saw notable sterling weakness during the year, with economic weakness compounded by political uncertainty. It is disappointing to report a negative return for the Company and underperformance of the benchmark over this period. Many of our investments have been caught up in the market turbulence and fallen sharply regardless of the strength of their underlying operations and financial results. To be clear, we do make mistakes at the individual company level (the consequences of which are often very painful) but this is not a year where our poor performance can be attributed to lots of profit warnings or negative developments to investment Dan Whitestone Investment Manager “This trust consists of highly profitable, cash generative growth companies, many of which are now trading on low price to earnings multiples, with high single digit free cash flow yields and in many cases large percentages of their market cap in net cash.” Pharmaceuticals business Ergomed outperformed the market as it continues to deliver strong sales growth, particularly in North America. Its companies provide full-service pharmacovigilance and specialist clinical trial solutions to the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. PHOTO COURTESY OF ERGOMED

theses. The underperformance has been driven by our style bias towards growth – and the market devaluation of growth businesses. This is particularly frustrating as whilst we understand and agree with the logic to devalue loss-making and cash-consumptive speculative businesses as interest rates rise, many profitable and differentiated businesses have been unfairly punished too. Furthermore, it is with a sense of real irony that many companies with strong pricing power and no debt have fared far worse than peers who have inferior balance sheets and weaker track records of volume growth and margin expansion. Indeed, it is the latter that are far more exposed to inflationary cost pressures and higher interest charges eroding profitability and cashflows. We have continued to apply our robust investment process and most of our companies have continued to execute well operationally and financially through the year. Their share price falls reflect a change in valuation as the market reassesses the appropriate price to pay for these type of businesses, in context of greater economic uncertainty and rising interest rates. We think it is far too simplistic to respond by dismissing the long book with words to the effect of “well surely they were all far too expensive to begin with” as we think this often belies their impressive track records of growth and returns, not to mention underestimating their prospects to grow their earnings significantly in time, and therefore fails to reflect the time horizon one needs to evaluate success of small and mid-cap growth companies. In hindsight, in 2022 the aggregate draw-down in valuation that has occurred was greater than expected, and whilst this has been very frustrating for us this year, it is fortunately also a source of optimism. Earnings expectations and company valuations have fallen a long way. The next few years will present new challenges we have not seen before, but we firmly believe the status quo is unsustainable and that those companies that can continue to deliver will be appropriately rewarded in time. Small and mid-cap does suffer during these market rotations but this asset class has proven to be an excellent driver of long-term investment returns since it was first established in 1955 and we believe that it will continue to support long-term performance. Performance review The past 12 months has been an extremely challenging period to navigate, particularly for our quality growth focused investment style. The Company’s NAV total return of -31.1% is disappointing and compares Investment Manager’s report continued Promotional products sales and distribution specialist 4imprint delivered multiple upgrades during the year. Market share gains and increased above-the-line advertising have helped drive record revenue levels. PHOTO COURTESY OF 4IMPRINT

Section 1: Overview and performance 15 unfavourably to the benchmark total return of -17.5% and for that I would like to apologise to the Company’s loyal shareholders. While the long-term track record of the Company remains strong in both absolute and relative terms, the extent of underperformance has been more than I anticipated, particularly given the strength of trading that we have continued to see across a large portion of our long book. There are two broad drivers of the underperformance this year: i) a rotation away from quality growth towards value; and ii) elevated gross and net exposure at the start of the year magnifying the draw-down in performance. The primary driver of underperformance was the rotation from higher growth companies, and a broad de-rating across the UK small and mid-cap market. Extraordinarily we have had fewer company specific disappointments than usual but in the short-term share prices are also influenced by additional factors, including the macro and political environment, the discount rate, liquidity, and investor sentiment and flows which can override strong company specifics. It is these factors that have hurt. Over the longer-term, we believe growth in absolute value is all about the growth of cash-backed earnings and we take comfort that by continuing to focus on differentiated and profitable growth companies, that continue to meet and beat expectations, our patience will be rewarded with significant share price recoveries in these holdings. When looking over the second half of the financial year, we can see that performance certainly improved compared to the first half, and the outcome over the last 12 months has really been a result of the market moves that we experienced at the beginning of 2022. The market rotation saw a number of our core holdings, such as Gamma Communications, Auction Technology Group and YouGov, fall significantly due to the de-rating of growth shares, despite all reporting strong results with material upgrades in the case of Gamma and YouGov. The effect of this rotation/de-rating was amplified by the high gross and net exposure that the Company came into the year with. As a reminder, we were not making a call on a rising market. It reflected the strength of trading that many of our long positions had delivered in 2021, along with some huge positive revisions in their forecasts. Following many meetings with management teams, and various channel checks, we felt extremely confident that these companies would continue to deliver (which on average they have). We reduced both the gross and net exposures in the summer; in retrospect, I recognise that de-risking sooner would have helped cushion relative performance. Whilst the short book made a positive contribution (+0.6%) the positive impact of this was reduced due to the elevated net positioning of the Company at the start of the year. It is important to note that within the world of UK small and mid-caps, liquidity can disappear just when you need it most. This did hamper us somewhat in the first few months when many of our investments sold off so sharply on low liquidity. At the point that the Company's exposure had been Though a detractor over the year, we believe Watches of Switzerland, the portfolio’s largest holding, continues to present a very com- pelling medium-term growth story as the company builds out its US and European network in a supply-constrained industry. PHOTO COURTESY OF WATCHES OF SWITZERLAND

16 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 reduced and de-risked, we felt it was too risky to shareholders to increase our short exposure materially. In terms of stock specific detractors during the year, the largest was IntegraFin, which we mentioned in the Half Yearly report. It is a UK wealth management platform for financial advisers and disappointed the market over their guidance for costs. An attractive feature of this business had been high levels of recurring (and growing) revenues but the management felt it necessary to increase operating spend to deliver best in class service resulting in margins falling from their historic mid 40% range. This should not really change the fundamental long term investment case as a market share winner, but in the near term does raise questions around what the normalised margin will be. We reduced the position until there is further clarity on the medium-term margin. Elsewhere within Financials, our holding in Impax Asset Management fell as investors adjusted their earning expectations as broader markets fell despite the business continuing to see net inflows. We remain confident in their market leading franchise in sustainable investing, which we think will continue to take market share. Shares in Dechra Pharmaceuticals, a multi-year performer for this Company, were weak and can be attributed to the rising discount rate weighing on its valuation. In terms of positive contributors, 4imprint Group delivered multiple upgrades during the year, with another 10% in the final month of our financial year, bringing the upgrades to forecasts in 2022 to 115%. 4imprint Group has seen an acceleration in market share gains after increased investment through COVID as well as adjusting their marketing efforts to more prominent ‘above-the-line advertising’ to drive brand awareness. This has driven record revenue levels despite the promotional products industry remaining below its 2019 level. 4imprint still has a single digit percentage market share, leaving lots of runway for future market share gains. Ergomed, a specialist service provider to the pharmaceuticals industry, outperformed the market as it continues to deliver strong sales growth, particularly in North America. Recent acquisitions appear to be integrating well and the management team remain confident in their long-term strategic progress, which includes further expansion into new geographies. Portfolio Positioning & Outlook Financial markets and macro data remain volatile and markets are likely to continue to be driven by inflation statistics and indications (or not) of slowing the pace of monetary tightening from central banks. This push and pull dynamic is likely to remain a recurring theme in the foreseeable future, but ultimately we continue to see evidence to support our thesis that inflation has peaked and is indeed falling and this will ultimately lead to the Federal Reserve (the Fed) to adjust their course. Some of the largest contributors to headline inflation (energy and food) are now showing lower year-on-year increases and might even turn negative year-on-year as we move into the first quarter of 2023. At the time of writing, four of the seven categories in core inflation (core inflation strips out food and energy from headline inflation) saw price declines in November data. Based on the data we track, we see leading indicators for shelter, the last remaining large positive contributor to core inflation, also reducing. We are not predicting either an imminent pivot by the Fed, nor a return to the ultra- lax monetary policy of the 2020/2021 period. We suspect the Fed will not pivot until there is a CPI data showing inflation close to 2% on a year-on-year basis. Our current best guess is quarter three of 2023, but we are not betting the house on it and will be led by the data. The change from hiking 75bps to hiking only 50bps at the last meeting demonstrates the direction of travel “Many of our investments have demonstrated incredible earnings resilience through 2022 despite the challenges they have faced from rising input costs, supply chain pressures and weakening demand. They continue to generate cash and have strong balance sheets. ” Investment Manager’s report continued

Section 1: Overview and performance 17 here too. That said, we do not expect this to be a smooth process and the market is likely to remain sensitive to both inflation data and any indications of changes to Fed policy. Turning attention to the portfolio, we would urge investors not to conflate share price weakness with a deterioration in investment cases. Many of our investments have demonstrated incredible earnings resilience through 2022 despite the challenges they have faced from rising input costs, supply chain pressures and weakening demand. They continue to generate cash and have strong balance sheets. Valuations have been reset and we feel that right now there is an asymmetric risk/reward profile developing within the portfolio. That is not to say that we think the market has definitively bottomed, but we do think very much that the worst is behind us, and share prices are already pricing in extremely bearish scenarios with little attention (and value) ascribed to their long-term prospects, increasing profits and growing cash flows. This will return in time. Whilst we are always open to adding new short positions to the portfolio, we continue to believe the best value in the market today remains in well-financed companies with enduring long term organic growth prospects that will use this period to enhance their position to win more share. Industrials and Consumer Services are two of the sectors where we think some of the most differentiated and interesting investments reside and where we continue to deploy capital even though they are in the eye of the storm, so to speak, as investors grapple with headwinds to consumption and industrial activity. We look to the year ahead with optimism and are comforted by the strength of the holdings in the portfolio and our belief in the ability of our companies to navigate the upcoming environment. We will continue to follow our investment process that focuses on profitable, cash generative growth companies, many of which are now trading on low price to earnings multiples, with high single digit free cash flow yields and in many cases large percentages of their market capital in net cash. We believe the recovery potential in these shares is significant: in time share prices will follow earnings. We thank shareholders for your ongoing support. DAN WHITESTONE BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited 9 February 2023

Section 2: Portfolio 19 Portfolio Gamma Communications reported strong results. During the year the company announced a switch to Eco-SIM cards across its network of partners and customers. Manufactured by Thales, Eco-SIM is the first SIM card made from 100% post- consumer recycled plastic. PHOTO COURTESY OF GAMMA COMMUNICATIONS

20 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 10 7 4 1 9 6 3 8 5 2 PHOTOS COURTESY OF WATCHES OF SWITZERLAND, OXFORD INSTRUMENTS, 4IMPRINT GROUP, RS GROUP, CVS GROUP, ERGOMED, GAMMA COMMUNICATIONS, DIPLOMA, WHSMITH, AUCTION TECHNOLOGY GROUP.

Section 2: Portfolio 21 Portfolio of investments 1 Watches of Switzerland (2021: 2nd) Personal Goods Market value: £20,601,000 Share of net assets: 3.3% (2021: 3.3%) Retailer of luxury watches. 2 Oxford Instruments (2021: 6th) Electronic & Electrical Equipment Market value: £19,805,000 1 Share of net assets: 3.1% (2021: 2.7%) Designer and manufacturer of tools and systems for industry and research. 3 4imprint Group (2021: 25th) Media Market value: £19,756,000 Share of net assets: 3.1% (2021: 1.5%) Supplier of promotional merchandise in the US. 4 RS Group (2021: n/a) Support Services Market value: £18,447,000 Share of net assets: 2.9% (2021: n/a) Distributor of industrial and electronic products. 5 CVS Group* (2021: 12th) General Retailers Market value: £18,348,000 Share of net assets: 2.9% (2021: 1.9%) Operator of veterinary surgeries. 6 Ergomed* (2021: 20th) Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology Market value: £18,100,000 1 Share of net assets: 2.9% (2021: 1.7%) Provider of pharmaceuticals services. 7 Gamma Communications* (2021: 3rd) Mobile Telecommunications Market value: £17,977,000 Share of net assets: 2.8% (2021: 3.1%) Provider of communication services to UK businesses. 8 Diploma (2021: 39th) Support Services Market value: £16,958,000 1 Share of net assets: 2.7% (2021: 1.2%) Supplier of specialised technical products and services. 9 WH Smith (2021: 24th) General Retailers Market value: £16,263,000 Share of net assets: 2.6% (2021: 1.5%) Retailer of books, stationery, magazines, newspapers and confectionery. 10 Auction Technology Group (2021: 7th) General Retailers Market value: £16,202,000 Share of net assets: 2.6% (2021: 2.7%) Operator of marketplaces for curated online auctions. * Traded on the Alternative Investment Market (AIM) of the London Stock Exchange. 1 Includes long derivative positions. Percentages shown are the share of net assets.

22 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 # Company £’000 % Description 11 YouGov* Media 15,366 2.4 Provider of survey data and specialist data analytics 12 Breedon* Construction & Materials 14,879 2.4 Supplier of construction materials 13 Grafton Group Support Services 13,101 2.1 Builders merchants in the UK, Ireland and Netherlands 14 Dunelm Group General Retailers 12,836 2.0 Retailer of homeware products 15 SigmaRoc* Construction & Materials 12,555 2.0 Buy-and-build group targeting construction materials assets in the UK and Northern Europe 16 Computacenter Software & Computer Services 12,396 1 2.0 Computer services 17 Tatton Asset Management* Financial Services 12,145 1.9 Provider of discretionary fund management services to the IFA market 18 Baltic Classifieds Group Software & Computer Services 11,530 1 1.8 Operator of online classified businesses in the Baltics 19 Games Workshop Leisure Goods 11,079 1 1.8 Developer, publisher and manufacturer of miniature war games 20 Qinetiq Group Aerospace & Defence 11,056 1.7 Provider of scientific and technological services to the defence, security and aerospace markets 21 Spirent Technology Hardware & Equipment 10,992 1.7 Multinational telecommunications testing 22 Dechra Pharmaceuticals Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology 10,340 1.6 Developer and supplier of pharmaceutical and other products focused on the veterinary market 23 Rotork Electronic & Electrical Equipment 9,972 1.6 Manufacturer of industrial flow equipment 24 Impax Asset Management* Financial Services 9,828 1.6 Provider of asset management services 25 Mattioli Woods* Financial Services 9,542 1.5 Provider of wealth management services 26 Euronext Financial Services 8,779 1 1.4 European stock exchange 27 Robert Walters Support Services 8,720 1.4 Provider of specialist recruitment services 28 Chemring Group Aerospace & Defence 8,694 1.4 Provider of technology products and services to aerospace, defence and security markets 29 Bytes Technology Software & Computer Services 8,511 1.3 Specialist in software, security and cloud services 30 Boku* Support Services 7,574 1.2 Digital payments platform 31 Workspace Group Real Estate Investment Trusts 7,542 1.2 Supply of flexible workspace to businesses in London 32 OSB Group Financial Services 6,941 1.1 Specialist lending business 33 Alfa Financial Software Software & Computer Services 6,482 1.0 Provider of software to the finance industry 34 Hunting Oil Equipment and Services 6,407 1 1.0 Oil services business 35 Leslie’s Leisure Goods 6,373 1 1.0 US direct to consumer retailer of swimming pool maintenance products 36 IntegraFin Financial Services 6,244 1.0 UK savings platform for financial advisors 37 Hiscox Non-life Insurance 6,203 1 1.0 Provider of insurance services 38 Serica Energy* Oil, Gas & Coal 5,978 0.9 Oil and gas producer 39 AJ Bell Financial Services 5,745 0.9 UK savings platform for financial advisors & individual investors Portfolio of investments continued

Section 2: Portfolio 23 # Company £’000 % Description 40 Morgan Sindall Construction & Materials 5,719 1 0.9 Supplier of office fit out, construction and urban regeneration services 41 Londonmetric Property Real Estate Investment Trusts 5,690 1 0.9 Investor in, and developer of property 42 Axon Enterprise Support Services 5,617 1 0.9 US based provider of technology and weapons products 43 Spectris Electronic & Electrical Equipment 5,578 0.9 Supplier of productivity enhancing instrumentation and controls 44 Serco Group Support Services 5,561 0.9 Provider of public services across health, transport, immigration, defence, justice and citizen services 45 Safestore Real Estate Investment Trusts 5,375 0.8 Provider of self-storage units 46 Sirius Real Estate Real Estate Investment & Services 5,282 0.8 Owner and operator of business parks, offices and industrial complexes in Germany 47 Gaztransport et Technigaz Oil, Gas & Coal 5,228 0.8 French multinational naval engineering business 48 Cranswick Food Producers 5,036 0.8 Producer of premium, fresh and added-value food products 49 Hill & Smith Holdings Industrial Metals & Mining 4,991 0.8 Supplier of infrastructure products and galvanizing services 50 Restore* Support Services 4,981 0.8 Provider of records management services 51 Young & Co’s Brewery* Travel & Leisure 4,965 0.8 Owner and operator of pubs mainly in the London area 52 Learning Technologies* Software & Computer Services 4,961 0.8 Provider of e-learning services 53 Moneysupermarket.com Software & Computer Services 4,810 1 0.8 Provider of price comparison website specialising in financial services 54 Jet2* Travel & Leisure 4,803 0.8 Low cost tour operator and airline 55 DiscoverIE Electronic & Electrical Equipment 4,732 0.7 International designer, manufacturer and supplier of customised electronics 56 GlobalData* Media 4,538 1 0.7 Data analytics and consulting 57 Clarkson Industrial Transportation 4,474 0.7 Provider of shipping services 58 Vesuvius Industrial Engineering 4,339 1 0.7 British engineered ceramics company 59 Porvair Industrial Engineering 4,240 0.7 Specialist filtration and environmental technology 60 Next Fifteen Communications* Media 4,227 0.7 Provider of digital communication products and services 61 Accesso Technology* Software & Computer Services 4,191 1 0.7 Provider of ticketing and virtual queuing solutions 62 BE Semiconductor Technology Hardware & Equipment 4,093 1 0.6 Dutch company engaged in the development, manufacturing, marketing, sales and service of semiconductor assembly equipment for the global semiconductor and electronics industries 63 Judges Scientific* Electronic & Electrical Equipment 4,090 0.6 Designer and producer of scientific instruments 64 Zotefoams Chemicals 3,987 1 0.6 Manufacturer of polyolefin foams used in sport, construction, marine, automation, medical equipment and aerospace 65 Xero* Software & Computer Services 3,913 1 0.6 Software company specialising in accounting for small businesses 66 Ashmore Group Financial Services 3,874 1 0.6 Emerging market focused investment manager 67 The Pebble Group* Media 3,780 0.6 Designer and manufacturer of promotional goods

24 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 # Company £’000 % Description 68 Polar Capital Holdings* Financial Services 3,772 0.6 Provider of investment management services 69 Eckoh* Software & Computer Services 3,618 0.6 Global provider of secure payments products 70 TP ICAP Investment Banking & Brokerage 3,529 0.6 Inter-dealer broker 71 AB Dynamics* Industrial Engineering 3,477 0.5 Developer and supplier of specialist automotive testing systems 72 Kainos Group Software & Computer Services 3,462 1 0.5 Provider of digital technology solutions 73 TT Electronics Electronic & Electrical Equipment 3,447 1 0.5 Global manufacturer of electronic components 74 Team17* Leisure Goods 3,385 0.5 Video game developer and publisher 75 Howden Joinery Group General Retailers 3,343 1 0.5 Kitchen and joinery product supplier 76 SThree Support Services 3,266 0.5 Provider of specialist professional recruitment services 77 Johnson Service Group* Support Services 3,232 0.5 Provider of textile services 78 Advanced Medical Solutions* Healthcare Equipment & Services 3,229 1 0.5 Developer and manufacturer of advanced wound care solutions 79 Halfords Specialty Retailers 3,174 0.5 Retailer of motoring and cycling products 80 Genuit Group Construction & Materials 3,011 0.5 Manufacturer of plastic piping systems 81 Babcock International Group Aerospace & Defence 2,875 0.5 British aerospace, defence and nuclear engineering services company 82 Kier Group Support Services 2,841 0.4 UK construction, services and property group 83 Victorian Plumbing* Home Improvement Retailers 2,794 1 0.4 Online retailer of bathroom products 84 Big Technologies* Software & Computer Services 2,760 0.4 Provider of remote personal monitoring products 85 Anpario* Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology 2,705 0.4 Manufacturer and distributor of natural animal feed additives for animal health, nutrition and biosecurity 86 Animalcare Group* Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology 2,530 0.4 Veterinary pharmaceuticals business 87 Cerillion* Software & Computer Services 2,489 0.4 Provider of billing, charging and customer management systems 88 Renishaw Electronic & Electrical Equipment 2,486 0.4 Engineering and scientific technology company 89 Future Media 2,335 0.4 Multi-platform media business covering technology, entertainment, creative arts, home interest and education 90 MaxCyte* Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology 2,306 0.4 Clinical-stage global cell-based therapies and life sciences company 91 Genus Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology 2,166 0.3 Animal genetics company 92 Pets at Home General Retailers 2,038 0.3 Retailer of pet supplies 93 Lok’nStore* Real Estate Investment & Services 2,007 0.3 Provider of self-storage space in the UK 94 Luceco Electronic & Electrical Equipment 1,593 0.3 Supplier & manufacturer of high quality LED lighting products 95 XP Power Electronic & Electrical Equipment 1,588 0.3 Leading provider of power solutions Portfolio of investments continued

Section 2: Portfolio 25 # Company £’000 % Description 96 Gooch & Housego* Electronic & Electrical Equipment 1,359 0.2 Designer and manufacturer of advanced photonic systems 97 Moonpig Group General Retailers 1,263 0.2 Internet based provider of personalised cards and gifts 98 Close Brothers Group Banks 951 0.2 UK merchant banking group providing lending, deposit taking, wealth management services and securities trading Long investment positions (excluding BlackRock’s Institutional Cash Series plc – Sterling Liquid Environmentally Aware Fund) 676,373 106.8 Short investment positions (15,637) (2.5) 1 Includes long derivative positions. * Traded on the Alternative Investment Market (AIM) of the London Stock Exchange. Percentages shown are the share of net assets. At 30 November 2022, the Company held equity interests in four companies comprising more than 3% of a company’s share capital as follows: Tatton Asset Management: 4.3%; SigmaRoc: 3.6%; Eckoh: 3.1% and Mattioli Woods: 3.1%.

26 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 Fair value 1 Gross market exposure 2 Gross market exposure as a % of net assets 2 £’000 £’000 2022 2021 Long investment positions (excluding BlackRock’s Institutional Cash Series plc – Sterling Liquid Environmentally Aware Fund) 579,502 676,373 106.8 121.4 Short investment positions 1 (133) (15,637) (2.5) (2.7) Cash and cash equivalents 1,3 103 (81,264) (12.8) (21.1) BlackRock’s Institutional Cash Series plc - Sterling Liquid Environmentally Aware Fund 58,690 58,690 9.3 2.7 Other net current liabilities (4,805) (4,805) (0.8) (0.3) Net assets 633,357 633,357 100.0 100.0 The Company uses gearing through the use of long and short CFD positions. Gross and Net Gearing as at 30 November 2022 were 109.3% and 104.3% respectively (2021: 124.1% and 118.7% respectively). Gross and Net Gearing are Alternative Performance Measures, see Glossary on pages 131 to 133. 1 Fair value is determined as follows: – Listed and AIM quoted investments are valued at bid prices where available, otherwise at published price quotations. – The sum of the fair values of the long and short investment positions above is determined based on the difference between the purchase price or transaction price and value of the underlying shares in the contract (in effect the unrealised gains/(losses) on the exposed positions). The cost of securities held through long derivative positions directly in the market would have amounted to £96,871,000 at the time of purchase, and subsequent market rises in prices have resulted in unrealised gains on the long derivative positions of £2,731,000, resulting in the value of the total market exposure to the underlying securities increasing to £99,602,000 as at 30 November 2022. – The notional price of selling the securities to which exposure was gained via the short derivative positions would have been £15,504,000 at the time of entering into the contract, and subsequent price rises have resulted in unrealised losses on the short derivative positions of £133,000 and the value of the market exposure of these investments increasing to £15,637,000 at 30 November 2022. If the short derivative positions had been closed on 30 November 2022 this would have resulted in a loss of £133,000 for the Company. 2 Market exposure in the case of equity investments is the same as fair value. In the case of long and short derivative positions, it is the market value of the underlying shares to which the portfolio is exposed via the contract. 3 The gross market exposure column for cash and cash equivalents has been adjusted to assume the Company traded direct holdings, rather than exposure being gained through long and short derivative positions. Fair value and gross market exposure of investments as at 30 November 2022

Section 2: Portfolio 27 Distribution of investments as at 30 November 2022 Sector % of long portfolio % of short portfolio % of net portfolio Aerospace & Defence 3.4 0.0 3.4 Construction & Materials 5.5 (0.5) 5.0 Electronic & Electrical Equipment 8.3 0.0 8.3 Industrial Engineering 1.8 0.0 1.8 Industrial Support Services 0.0 (0.2) (0.2) Industrial Transportation 0.7 0.0 0.7 Support Services 13.7 (0.2) 13.5 Industrials 33.4 (0.9) 32.5 General Retailers 10.6 0.0 10.6 Home Improvement Retailers 0.4 0.0 0.4 Household Furnishings 0.0 (0.2) (0.2) Leisure Goods 3.2 0.0 3.2 Media 7.6 0.0 7.6 Specialty Retailers 0.5 (0.3) 0.2 Travel & Leisure 1.5 0.0 1.5 Consumer Discretionary 23.8 (0.5) 23.3 Software & Computer Services 10.5 (0.6) 9.9 Technology Hardware & Equipment 2.3 0.0 2.3 Technology 12.8 (0.6) 12.2 Banks 0.1 0.0 0.1 Closed End Investments 0.0 (0.3) (0.3) Financial Services 10.1 0.0 10.1 Investment Banking & Brokerage 0.5 0.0 0.5 Non-life Insurance 0.9 0.0 0.9 Financials 11.6 (0.3) 11.3 Healthcare Equipment & Services 0.5 0.0 0.5 Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology 5.8 0.0 5.8 Health Care 6.3 0.0 6.3 Real Estate Investment & Services 1.1 0.0 1.1 Real Estate Investment Trusts 2.8 0.0 2.8 Real Estate 3.9 0.0 3.9 Beverages 0.0 (0.2) (0.2) Food Producers 0.8 0.0 0.8 Personal Goods 3.1 0.0 3.1 Consumer Staples 3.9 (0.2) 3.7 Oil, Gas & Coal 1.7 0.0 1.7 Oil Equipment and Services 1.0 0.0 1.0 Oil & Gas 2.7 0.0 2.7 Mobile Telecommunications 2.7 0.0 2.7 Telecommunications 2.7 0.0 2.7 Chemicals 0.6 0.0 0.6 Industrial Metals & Mining 0.8 0.0 0.8 Basic Materials 1.4 0.0 1.4 Total Investments 102.5 (2.5) 100.0 The above percentages are calculated on the net portfolio as at 30 November 2022. The net portfolio is calculated as long equity and derivative positions, less short derivative positions as at 30 November 2022.

28 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 0.9% 1.9% 11.3% 24.7% 18.2% 13.9% 12.6% -1.1% -0.3% £10bn+ £2bn – £2.5bn £2.5bn – £5bn £5bn – £10bn £1.5bn – £2bn £0m – £500m 1 The above investments may comprise exposures to long equity and long derivative positions. Source: BlackRock. Long positions 1 % of net portfolio Short positions -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% Market capitalisation as at 30 November 2022 -0.6% £500m – £1bn 0.0% 0.0% -0.3% 0.0% -0.2% 19.0% £1bn – £1.5bn -11 11 10 0 0 0 0 26 Long positions 1 Number of positions 1 The above investments may comprise exposures to long equity and long derivative positions. Source: BlackRock. Short positions £2.5m – £5m £0m – £2.5m £20m + £5m – £10m £15m – £20m -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Position size as at 30 November 2022 Market value 38 12 1 0 £10m – £15m Analysis of the portfolio

Section 2: Portfolio 29 FTSE 250 51.4% FTSE AIM 33.5% FTSE Small Cap 6.6% FTSE 100 4.2% Other 4.3% FTSE 250 50.7% FTSE AIM 33.5% FTSE Small Cap 6.9% FTSE 100 4.3% Other 4.6% Portfolio holdings within Key Benchmark Indices Gross Basis 1 Net Basis 2 Within Benchmark 56.8% Off-Benchmark 43.2% Source: BlackRock. 1 Long exposure plus short exposure as a percentage of the portfolio in aggregate excluding investment in BlackRock’s Institutional Cash Series plc – Sterling Liquid Environmentally Aware Fund. Long exposure less short exposure as a percentage of the portfolio excluding investment in BlackRock’s Institutional Cash Series plc – Sterling Liquid Environmentally Aware Fund. 2 Within Benchmark 58.6% Off-Benchmark 41.4% Holdings included within the Benchmark Index as at 30 November 2021 were 63.9% on a Gross Basis and 62.9% on a Net Basis. 3 Portfolio holdings within Benchmark Index (the Numis Smaller Companies plus AIM (excluding Investment companies) Index Net Basis 2,3 Gross Basis 1,3 Source: BlackRock. 1 Long exposure plus short exposure as a percentage of the portfolio in aggregate excluding investment in BlackRock’s Institutional Cash Series plc – Sterling Liquid Environmentally Aware Fund. 2 Long exposure less short exposure as a percentage of the portfolio excluding investment in BlackRock’s Institutional Cash Series plc – Sterling Liquid Environmentally Aware Fund.

Governance Section 3: Governance 31 During the year we increased our holding in Oxford Instruments, the specialist provider of high technology products and services to industrial companies and scientific research communities worldwide. PHOTO COURTESY OF OXFORD INSTRUMENTS

32 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 Governance structure Responsibility for good governance lies with the Board. The governance framework of the Company reflects the fact that, as an investment company, the Company has no employees, the Directors are all non-executive and the investment management and administration functions are outsourced to the Manager and other service providers. The Board 6 scheduled meetings per annum Membership: Seven Non-executive Directors (NED*), all independent of the Investment Manager Chairman: Christopher Samuel Key objectives: • To determine and review the investment policy, strategy and parameters; • To provide leadership within a framework of prudent and effective controls which enable risk to be assessed and managed, and the Company’s assets to be safeguarded; • To challenge constructively and scrutinise performance of all outsourced activities; and • To establish the Company’s remuneration policy and keep it under review. * As at 30 November 2022 the Board consisted of six Non-executive Directors. This number rose to seven following the appointment of Glen Suarez on 9 January 2023 and will reduce back to six following Loudon Greenlees’ retirement at the conclusion of the year's AGM. Audit Committee 1 3 scheduled meetings per annum* Membership: All NEDs Chairman: Loudon Greenlees Key objectives: • To oversee financial reporting; • To review the reporting of the auditor and the effectiveness of the audit; • To consider the adequacy of the control environment and to review the Company’s risk register; and • To review the performance of the third party service providers. Following this year’s AGM, Loudon Greenlees will retire as Audit Committee Chair and be replaced by Angela Lane. * The Committee has considered developing best practice around the number of times the audit committee of a FTSE 250 company should meet each year and has concluded that three meetings is appropriate. The Committee believes that it is not the number of meetings held that determines its effectiveness, it is the robustness of the debate and challenge, and the scope, timeliness and quality of the information which the committee considers. Management Engagement Committee 1 1 scheduled meeting per annum Membership: All NEDs Chairman: Christopher Samuel Key objectives: • To be responsible for the annual review of the performance of the Manager and Investment Manager; and • To ensure that the provisions of the management agreement follow industry practice, remain competitive and are in the best interest of shareholders. Nomination Committee 1 1 scheduled meeting per annum Membership: All NEDs Chairman: Christopher Samuel Key objectives: • To make recommendations for any new Board appointments; • To review regularly the structure, size and composition of the Board; and • To consider and make recommendations to the Board on matters of succession planning. Remuneration Committee 1,2 1 scheduled meeting per annum Membership: All NEDs Chairman: Angela Lane (since 1 February 2021) * Key objectives: • To make recommendations on remuneration of Directors; and • To determine and recommend to the Board a policy on Directors’ remuneration. * On 30 November 2022, Angela Lane retired as Remuneration Committee Chair and was replaced by Nigel Burton. 1 Terms of reference for the committee are available at www.blackrock.com/uk/thrg 2 The Company's remuneration committee was appointed by the Board on 1 February 2021.

Section 3: Governance 33 Directors’ biographies Christopher Samuel Appointed 1 June 2016 Chairman Christopher was Chief Executive of Ignis Asset Management from 2009 until its sale to Standard Life Investments in 2014. He was previously a Non-executive Director of Alliance Trust plc, Chief Operating Officer at Gartmore and Hill Samuel Asset Management and a Partner at Cambridge Place Investment Management. He is currently a Non-executive Director of UIL Limited 1 and Quilter plc 2 . He is also Chairman of JPMorgan Japanese Investment Trust plc. He qualified as a Chartered Accountant with KPMG. Attendance record: Board: 6/6 Audit Committee: 3/3 Management Engagement Committee: 1/1 Nomination Committee: 1/1 Remuneration Committee: 1/1 None of the Directors has a service contract with the Company. The terms of their appointment are detailed in a letter sent to them when they join the Board. These letters are available for inspection at the registered office of the Company and will be available at the Annual General Meeting. Louise Nash Appointed 21 March 2019 Senior Independent Director Louise was a UK Small and Mid-Cap fund manager, firstly at Cazenove Capital and latterly at M&G Investments which she left in 2015. She now works for family wine business Höpler and also acts as a consultant to JLC Investor Relations. Louise was previously a Non-executive Director of Stockdale Securities. Attendance record: Board: 6/6 Audit Committee: 3/3 Management and Engagement Committee: 1/1 Nomination Committee: 1/1 Remuneration Committee: 1/1 1 He is also a Director of UIL Limited’s subsidiary, UIL Finance. 2 He is also Chairman of Quilter plc’s subsidiary, Quilter Financial Planning.

34 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 Directors’ biographies continued Angela Lane Appointed 10 June 2020 Chairman of the Remuneration Committee until 30 November 2022. Chairman designate of the Audit Committee Angela previously spent 18 years working in private equity at 3i, becoming a partner in 3i's Growth Capital business managing the UK portfolio. Since 2007, Angela has held several non-executive and advisory roles for small and medium capitalised companies across a range of industries including business services, healthcare, travel, media, consumer goods and infrastructure. She is currently a Non-executive Director and Chairman of the Audit Committee of Pacific Horizon Investment Trust plc, Seraphim Space Investment Trust plc and Dunedin Enterprise Investment Trust plc. She is a Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales. Attendance record: Board: 6/6 Audit Committee: 3/3 Management Engagement Committee: 1/1 Nomination Committee: 1/1 Remuneration Committee: 1/1 Loudon Greenlees Appointed 26 March 2014 Chairman of the Audit Committee Loudon was Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of Thames River Capital from 1999 until 2007 and then Commercial Director until May 2013. Prior to this he had been Group Finance Director and Chief Operating Officer of Rothschild Asset Management and Group Finance Director of Baring Asset Management. He is a Chartered Accountant. Attendance record: Board: 6/6 Audit Committee: 3/3 Management Engagement Committee: 1/1 Nomination Committee: 1/1 Remuneration Committee: 1/1 None of the Directors has a service contract with the Company. The terms of their appointment are detailed in a letter sent to them when they join the Board. These letters are available for inspection at the registered office of the Company and will be available at the Annual General Meeting.

Section 3: Governance 35 None of the Directors has a service contract with the Company. The terms of their appointment are detailed in a letter sent to them when they join the Board. These letters are available for inspection at the registered office of the Company and will be available at the Annual General Meeting. Nigel Burton Appointed 21 December 2020 Non-executive Director Chairman of the Remuneration Committee with effect from 1 December 2022. Nigel spent over 14 years as an investment banker at leading City institutions including UBS Warburg and Deutsche Bank, including as the Managing Director responsible for the energy and utilities sector. He then spent 15 years as Chief Financial Officer or Chief Executive Officer of a number of private and public companies. Nigel is currently a Non-executive Director of AIM listed companies DeepVerge plc, Microsaic Systems plc, eEnergy Group plc and Location Sciences Group plc. He was formerly a Non-executive Director of Mobile Streams plc, Digitalbox plc, Corcel plc, Modern Water plc, Alexander Mining plc and Chairman of Remote Monitored Systems plc. Attendance record: Board: 6/6 Audit Committee: 3/3 Management Engagement Committee: 1/1 Nomination Committee: 1/1 Remuneration Committee: 1/1 Merryn Somerset Webb Appointed 24 March 2021 Non-executive Director Merryn has significant experience of financial matters through her role as Senior Columnist for Bloomberg Opinion, and writes extensively on personal finance matters across radio and television. She brings valuable investment trust specific experience and is also currently a Non-executive Director of Murray Income Investment Trust plc. She was formerly a Non-executive Director of Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon PLC and Netwealth Investments Limited. Attendance record: Board: 6/6 Audit Committee: 3/3 Management Engagement Committee: 1/1 Nomination Committee: 1/1 Remuneration Committee: 1/1

36 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 Glen Suarez Appointed 9 January 2023 Glen Suarez was appointed to the Board on 9 January 2023. He is an experienced director, having held both executive and non-executive roles. He is currently a Non-executive director of Impax Environmental Markets plc and chairman of the board of Knight Vinke Asset Management. He is a senior adviser to FMAP Limited, a consultancy founded by Lord Maude which advises governments on the implementation of public sector reform. Glen was chairman of The Edinburgh Investment Trust plc until July 2022 and was a committee member and co-chair of the Capital Markets Advisory Committee, an independent body advising the IASB on accounting issues and standards between 2014 and 2020. He is a Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales and a member of the Royal Society of Arts. Attendance record: Not applicable as appointed after the year end. Directors’ biographies continued

Section 3: Governance 37 Strategic report The Directors present the Strategic Report of the Company for the year ended 30 November 2022. Principal activities The Company is a public company limited by shares which carries on business as an investment trust and its principal activity is portfolio investment. Objective The Company’s objective is to provide shareholders with long term capital growth and an attractive total return through investment primarily in UK smaller and mid-capitalisation companies traded on the London Stock Exchange. Strategy, business model, investment policy and investment process The Company invests in accordance with the objective given above. The Board is collectively responsible to shareholders for the long term success of the Company and is its governing body. There is a clear division of responsibility between the Board and the Manager, BlackRock Fund Managers Limited (BFM). Matters for the Board include setting the Company’s strategy, including its investment objective and policy, setting limits on gearing (both bank borrowings and the effect of derivatives), capital structure, governance, and appointing and monitoring of performance of service providers, including the Manager. The Company’s business model follows that of an externally managed investment trust; therefore the Company does not have any employees and outsources its activities to third party service providers, including the Manager who is the principal service provider. The management of the investment portfolio and the administration of the Company have been contractually delegated to BFM. The Manager, operating under guidelines determined by the Board, has direct responsibility for the decisions relating to the day-to-day running of the Company and is accountable to the Board for the investment, financial and operating performance of the Company. Other service providers include the Depositary and the Fund Accountant, The Bank of New York Mellon (International) Limited, and the Registrar, Computershare Investor Services PLC. Details of the contractual terms with third party service providers are set out in the Directors’ Report. Investment Policy The Company’s performance is measured against the Numis Smaller Companies plus AIM (excluding Investment Companies) Index (the Benchmark Index). The Investment Manager, BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited (BIM (UK)), may invest in companies outside the Benchmark Index without restriction, subject to the following limits. The Company may hold up to 15% of its gross assets, at the time of acquisition, in securities of companies which are listed or traded on a stock exchange outside the UK. In addition to the normal long only portfolio, the Company will likely hold a mixture of long and short contracts for difference (CFDs) and/or comparable equity derivatives that would result in a typical net market exposure of between 100% and 115%. In extremis, the Company could deploy the full 30% of permissible leverage into short CFDs and/or comparable equity derivatives, thereby reducing its overall net market exposure to 70%. What makes BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc different? • A greater toolkit for outperformance • Potential for enhanced outperformance generation through taking both long and short positions • Ability to smooth out volatility of returns whilst maintaining exposure to the attractive, but sometimes volatile, asset class of UK smaller and mid-capitalisation companies • Ability to flex overall market exposure to potentially reduce correlation to the market A superior toolkit for outperformance Risk management cannot fully eliminate the risk of investment loss. There is no guarantee that a positive investment outcome will be achieved. Source: BlackRock. For illustrative purposes only. Conventional Long only fund BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc = long only + leverage short alpha alpha potential alpha potential Same net market exposure

38 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 The Company may also invest up to 2.5% of its net assets (measured at the time of investment) in unquoted securities, including securities issued by companies incorporated outside the United Kingdom. However, the Company may invest more than 2.5%, but no more than 3.75%, of its net assets (both measured at the time of investment), in unquoted securities in circumstances where such investment is in an existing investee company and, in the Investment Manager’s opinion, a failure of the Company to make such investment would have a material adverse effect on the value of the Company’s investment in such investee company. In addition, the Company is permitted to employ leverage up to 30% of net assets, which it does primarily through the use of CFDs and/or comparable equity derivatives, rather than bank borrowings, therefore enabling the Company to have a maximum net market exposure of 130%. In normal circumstances the Company will likely hold a mixture of long and short CFDs and/or comparable equity derivatives that would result in a typical net market exposure of between 100% and 115%*. Portfolio risk will be mitigated by investment in a diversified portfolio of holdings. No more than 5% of the Company’s gross assets, at the time of acquisition, may be invested in any one single holding, excluding holdings in cash or money market funds, where up to 10% of the Company’s gross assets may be held. The Company may also invest in collective investment vehicles. However, the Company will not invest more than 10% of its gross assets, at the time of the acquisition, in other listed closed-ended investment funds, unless such companies have a stated investment policy not to invest more than 15% of their gross assets in other listed closed-ended investment funds, in which case the limit is 15% of gross assets. The Board’s policy is that net gearing, borrowings less cash, should not exceed 20% of gross assets. The Company expects to employ any leverage primarily through its use of CFDs and/or comparable equity derivatives. No material change will be made to the investment objective and policy without shareholder approval. Investment process A unique feature of the Company is that it has the ability to go both long and short up to approximately 30% of the Company’s net assets. Notwithstanding recent positive returns from UK small and mid-capitalisation companies, the sector has demonstrated considerable volatility over the past 20 years. Such an environment provides an attractive opportunity to add value via derivatives: instruments which can exploit share price moves whether up or down. As the maximum short portfolio exposure through derivatives is 30% of net assets, the Company will at all times retain an exposure to the market, as shown in the chart on page 39. In the course of their research the investment management team comes across companies A clear investment process underpins portfolio construction Source: BlackRock. Investment process subject to change. For illustrative purposes only. Idea generation In-depth fundamental company analysis Typical portfolio construction Earnings growth Industry Market position Cash generation Looking through the Long / Short lens BlackRock resources Company meetings External research Macro / thematic Diversification c.130 positions Longs c.1% to 5% Shorts c.0.5% to 1% Net: 90% to 115% Gross: 100% to 130% Lower, managed volatility Balance sheet BlackRock Emerging Companies Team Portfolio Manager Management Regular engagement with BlackRock Investment Stewardship and Risk Function throughout the investment process * The AIC measures gearing at gross level, rather than net market exposure level (i.e. gearing is calculated as borrowings + long CFDs and/or comparable equity derivatives + short CFDs and/or comparable equity derivatives) and therefore the published gearing figures will be higher than the typical net market exposure of between 100% and 115%. Strategic report continued

Section 3: Governance 39 which they judge are likely to underperform; the ability to take short positions therefore significantly enhances the opportunity to make money for shareholders. This is not possible in a conventional or long only portfolio. When markets are expected to rise in the medium term, the long/short strategy is used to generate additional market exposure through ensuring that the long exposure exceeds the short exposure in a range between 0% to 15% of the net assets of the Company. Rising or ‘bull’ markets have historically (in the UK) persisted for longer than falling or ‘bear’ markets. A typical net market exposure might therefore be between 100% and 115%. This is lower than the ‘gross exposure’, which is the combination of the long equity positions, plus the net of long and short derivative positions expressed as a percentage of net assets. ESG integration The Manager defines Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) integration as the practice of incorporating material ESG information and consideration of sustainability risks into investment decisions in order to enhance risk-adjusted returns. This statement does not imply that the Company has an ESG-aligned investment objective, but rather describes how ESG information is considered as part of the overall investment process. Of course, ESG information is not the sole consideration for investment decisions; instead, the Manager assesses a variety of economic and financial indicators which include ESG considerations in combination with other information in the research phase of the investment process to make investment decisions appropriate to their client’s objectives. This may also include relevant third party insight, as well as internal engagement commentary and input from BlackRock Investment Stewardship (BIS) on governance issues. The Investment Manager conducts regular portfolio reviews with the BlackRock Risk and Quantitative Analysis (RQA) team. These reviews include discussion of the portfolio's exposure to material ESG risks, as well as exposure to sustainability- related business involvements, climate-related metrics, traditional financial risks and other factors. The Manager’s approach to ESG integration is to broaden the total amount of information its investment professionals consider in order to improve investment analysis, seeking to meet or exceed economic return and financial risk targets. ESG factors can be useful and relevant indicators for investment purposes and can help portfolio managers with their decision-making through identifying potentially negative events or corporate behaviour. The Investment Manager works closely with BIS to assess the governance quality of companies and understand any potential issues, risks or opportunities. The Manager’s research team monitors differing levels of risk throughout the process and believes that avoiding major downside events can generate significant outperformance over the long term. Inputs from the RQA team are an integral part of the investment process. The RQA team analyse market and portfolio risk factors including stress tests, correlations, factor returns, cross-sectional volatility and attributions. The Manager’s evaluation procedures and financial analysis of the companies within the portfolio also take into account environmental, social and governance matters and other business issues. The Company does not meet the criteria for Article 8 or 9 products under the EU Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) and the investments underlying this financial product do not take into account the EU criteria for environmentally sustainable economic activities. The Investment Manager has access to a range of data sources, including principal adverse indicator (PAI) data, when making decisions on the selection of investments. However, whilst BlackRock considers ESG risks for all portfolios and these risks may coincide with environmental or social themes associated with the PAIs, the Company does not commit to considering PAIs in driving the selection of its investments. Further information on the Manager’s approach to ESG and sustainability can be found in the report on Responsible Investing on page 52. Performance The Investment Manager’s report on pages 13 to 17 includes a review of the main developments during the year, together with information on investment activity within the Company’s portfolio. Net market exposure is the long equity positions, plus the net of long and short derivative positions. For illustrative purposes only. Typical market positioning – % of NAV (115% net exposure) Long positions Short positions Net market exposure 100 0 115% 120% 5% %

40 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 Results and dividends The results for the Company are set out in the Statement of Comprehensive Income on page 88. The total loss for the year, after taxation, was £295,888,000 (2021: a profit of £223,334,000) of which the revenue return amounted to £13,257,000 (2021: £11,446,000) and a capital loss of £309,145,000 (2021: profit of £211,888,000). Details of the dividends declared in respect of the year are set out in the Chairman’s Statement on page 9. Key performance indicators At each Board meeting, the Directors consider a number of performance measures to assess the Company’s success in achieving its objectives. The key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the progress and performance of the Company over time, and which are comparable to those reported by other investment trusts, are set out in the table below. These KPIs fall within the definition of ‘Alternative Performance Measures’ (APMs) under guidance issued by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), and additional information explaining how these are calculated is set out in the Glossary on pages 131 to 133. The Board monitors the KPIs at each meeting. Additionally, it regularly reviews a number of indices and ratios to understand the impact on the Company’s relative performance of the various components such as asset allocation and stock selection. This includes an assessment of the Company’s performance and ongoing charges against its peer group of investment trusts with similar investment objectives. Year ended 30 November 2022 Year ended 30 November 2021 Net asset value total return 1,2 (31.1)% 37.0% Share price total return 1,2 (35.5)% 38.8% Benchmark Index total return 3 (17.5)% 24.5% (Discount)/premium to cum income net asset value 2 (5.0)% 1.4% Revenue return per share 12.95p 12.15p Total dividend per share 11.10p 10.50p Ongoing charges 2,4 0.54% 0.57% Ongoing charges including performance fees 2,5 0.54% 1.38% 1 This measures the Company’s share price and NAV total return, which assumes dividends paid by the Company have been reinvested. 2 Alternative Performance Measures, see Glossary on pages 131 to 133. 3 The Company's Benchmark Index is the Numis Smaller Companies plus AIM (excluding Investment Companies) Index. 4 Ongoing charges represent the management fee and all other operating expenses, excluding the performance fee, finance costs, direct transaction costs, custody transaction charges, VAT recovered, taxation, prior year expenses written back and certain non-recurring items as a % of average daily net assets. 5 Ongoing charges represent the management fee, performance fee and all other operating expenses, excluding finance costs, direct transaction costs, custody transaction charges, VAT recovered, taxation, prior year expenses written back and certain non-recurring items as a % of average daily net assets. Share price discount/premium The Directors recognise that it is in the long term interests of shareholders that the Company’s shares do not trade at an excessive discount or premium to their prevailing NAV for any material length of time. In the year under review the discount/premium to NAV of the ordinary shares on a cum income basis has ranged between a discount of 14.3% and a premium of 2.7%, with the average being a discount of 3.5%. The shares ended the year at a discount of 5.0% on a cum income basis. As at 7 February 2023 the discount was 2.0%. As it does each year, the Board will also be seeking to renew the authority from shareholders at the AGM to issue new shares (or to reissue shares held in treasury) and to buy back shares. Further information on these powers and the Board's policy in this respect can also be found in the Chairman's Statement on page 9. Principal risks As required by the UK Code of Corporate Governance, the Board has in place a robust, ongoing process to identify, assess and monitor the principal and emerging risks of the Company, including those that they consider would threaten its business model, future performance, solvency or liquidity. Emerging risks are considered by the Board as they come into view and are incorporated into the Company’s risk register where applicable. Additionally, the Manager considers emerging risks in numerous forums and the Risk and Quantitative Analysis team produces an annual risk survey. Any material risks of relevance to the Company identified through the annual risk survey will be communicated to the Board. A core element of this process is the Company’s risk register, which identifies the risks facing the Company and the likelihood and potential impact of each risk, together with the controls established for mitigation. A residual risk rating is calculated for each risk, which allows the effect of any mitigating procedures to be reflected in the register. The Strategic report continued

Section 3: Governance 41 current risk register includes a range of risks spread between investment performance risk, income/dividend risk, legal & regulatory risk, counterparty risk, operational risk, market risk, political risk and financial risk. The risk register, its method of preparation and the operation of key controls in the Manager’s and third party service providers’ systems of internal control are reviewed on a regular basis by the Audit Committee. In order to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the Manager’s and other third party service providers’ risk management processes and how these apply to the Company’s business, the Audit Committee periodically receives presentations from BlackRock’s Internal Audit and Risk & Quantitative Analysis teams. Where produced, the Audit Committee also reviews summaries of the Service Organisation Control (SOC1) reports from the Company’s service providers. The principal risks and uncertainties faced by the Company during the financial year, together with the potential effects, controls and mitigating factors, are set out in the table on pages 40 to 43. Principal Risk Mitigation/Control Investment performance The Board is responsible for: • setting the investment policy to fulfil the Company’s objectives; and • monitoring the performance of the Company’s Investment Manager and the strategy adopted. An inappropriate policy or strategy may lead to: • poor performance compared to the Company’s Benchmark Index, peer group or shareholder expectations; • a widening discount to NAV; • a reduction or permanent loss of capital; and • dissatisfied shareholders and reputational damage. To manage these risks the Board: • regularly reviews the Company’s investment mandate and long term strategy; • has set, and regularly reviews, the investment guidelines and has put in place appropriate limits on levels of gearing and the use of derivatives; • receives from the Investment Manager a regular explanation of stock selection decisions, portfolio gearing and any changes in gearing and the rationale for the composition of the investment portfolio; • receives from the Investment Manager regular reporting on the portfolio’s exposure through derivatives, including the extent to which the portfolio is geared in this manner and the value of any short positions; • monitors the maintenance of an adequate spread of investments in order to minimise the risks associated with particular sectors, based on the diversification requirements inherent in the Company’s investment policy; and • monitors the share price discount or premium to NAV. Market risk Market risk arises from changes to the prices of the Company’s investments. It represents the potential loss the Company might suffer through holding investments and derivatives. Market risk includes the potential impact of events which are outside the scope of the Company’s control, such as the UK’s decision to leave the European Union, Russia's invasion of Ukraine and the impacts of climate change. The Board carefully considers the diversification of the portfolio, asset allocation, stock selection, unquoted investments and levels of gearing on a regular basis and has set investment restrictions and guidelines which are monitored and reported on by the Investment Manager. The Board monitors the implementation and results of the investment process with the Investment Manager, and key market risk factors are discussed. The Board also recognises the benefits of a closed-end fund structure in extremely volatile markets such as those experienced with the COVID-19 pandemic and more recently the impact of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine on the global economy. Unlike open-ended counterparts, closed-end funds are not obliged to sell down portfolio holdings at low valuations to meet liquidity requirements for redemptions. During times of elevated volatility and market stress, the ability of a closed-end fund structure to remain invested for the long term enables the Investment Manager to adhere to disciplined fundamental analysis from a bottom-up perspective and be ready to respond to dislocations in the market as opportunities present themselves.

42 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 Principal Risk Mitigation/Control Income/dividend risk The amount of dividends and future dividend growth will depend on the performance of the Company’s underlying portfolio holdings. Changes in the composition of the portfolio and any change in the tax treatment of the dividends or interest received by the Company may reduce the level of dividends received by shareholders. The Board monitors this risk through the receipt of detailed income forecasts and considers the level of income at each meeting. The Company also has a revenue reserve and powers to pay dividends from capital which could potentially be used to support the Company’s dividend if required. Financial risk The Company’s investment activities expose it to a variety of financial risks that include market risk, foreign currency risk and interest rate risk. At 30 November 2022, the Company had approximately 33.5% of its gross asset value invested in AIM traded equity securities and 4.3% of its gross assets in international markets, and, by the very nature of its investment objective, largely invests in smaller companies. Liquidity in these securities can from time to time become constrained, making these investments difficult to realise at or near published prices. The Company is not materially exposed to foreign currency and interest rate risk. For mitigation of market risk, see above. There are also risks linked to the Company’s use of derivative transactions including long and short investment positions. Details are disclosed in note 11 on page 101, together with a summary of the policies for managing and controlling these risks in note 16. Operational risk In common with most other investment trust companies, the Company has no employees. The Company therefore relies upon the services provided by BlackRock (the Manager and AIFM) and The Bank of New York Mellon (International) Limited (the Depositary and Fund Accountant) who maintain the Company’s accounting records. Failure by any service provider to carry out its obligations to the Company could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s performance. Disruption to the accounting, payment systems or custody records, as a result of a cyber-attack or otherwise, could impact the monitoring and reporting of the Company’s financial position. The security of the Company’s assets, dealing procedures, accounting records and maintenance of regulatory and legal requirements, depend on the effective operation of these systems. The Board reviews the overall performance of the Manager, Investment Manager and all other third party service providers and compliance with the investment management agreement on a regular basis. The Fund Accountant’s and the Manager’s internal control processes are regularly tested and monitored throughout the year and are evidenced through their Service Organisation Control (SOC 1) reports, which are subject to review by an Independent Service Assurance Auditor. The SOC 1 reports provide assurance in respect of the effective operation of internal controls. The Company’s financial instruments held in custody are subject to a strict liability regime and in the event of a loss of such financial instruments held in custody, the Depositary must return assets of an identical type or the corresponding amount, unless able to demonstrate that the loss was a result of an event beyond its reasonable control. The Board considers succession arrangements for key employees of the Manager and the Board also considers the business continuity arrangements of the Company’s key service providers on an ongoing basis and reviews these as part of its review of the Company’s risk register. In respect of the unprecedented risks posed by the COVID-19 pandemic in terms of the ability of service providers to function effectively, the Board has received reports from key service providers setting out the measures that they have put in place to address the crisis, in addition to their existing business continuity framework. Having considered these arrangements and reviewed service levels since the crisis has evolved, the Board is confident that a good level of service has and will be maintained. The Board also receives regular updates from BlackRock’s internal audit function and the Company’s Audit Committee Chairman attends an annual briefing from the head of BlackRock’s internal audit function once a year. This is supplemented by a written report which describes the progress made against the current internal audit plan, any issues identified and the plan for the forthcoming year. Strategic report continued

Section 3: Governance 43 Principal Risk Mitigation/Control Legal and regulatory risk The Company has been approved by HM Revenue & Customs as an investment trust, subject to continuing to meet the relevant eligibility conditions, and operates as an investment trust in accordance with Chapter 4 of Part 24 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010. As such, the Company is exempt from capital gains tax on the profits realised from the sale of its investments. Any breach of the relevant eligibility conditions could lead to the Company losing its investment trust status and being subject to corporation tax on capital gains realised within the Company’s portfolio. In such event the investment returns of the Company may be adversely affected. Any serious breach could result in the Company and/or the Directors being fined or the subject of criminal proceedings or the suspension of the Company’s shares which would in turn lead to a breach of the Corporation Tax Act 2010. Risk of regulatory change Amongst other relevant laws and regulations, the Company is required to comply with the provisions of the Companies Act 2006, the Alternative Investment Fund Managers’ Directive (as retained and onshored in the UK), the Market Abuse Regulation (also as retained and onshored in the UK), the UK Listing Rules and the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules. The Investment Manager monitors investment movements, the level of forecast income and expenditure and the amount of proposed dividends, if any, to ensure that the provisions of Chapter 4 of Part 24 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010 are not breached, and the results are reported to the Board at each meeting. Following authorisation under the Alternative Investment Fund Managers’ Directive as retained and onshored in the UK (AIFMD), the Company and its appointed Alternative Investment Fund Manager (AIFM) are subject to the risks that the requirements of the AIFMD are not correctly complied with. The Board and the AIFM also monitor changes in government policy and legislation which may have an impact on the Company. Compliance with the accounting standards applicable to quoted companies and those applicable to investment trusts are also regularly monitored to ensure compliance. The Company Secretary and the Company’s professional advisers monitor developments in relevant laws and regulations and provide regular reports to the Board in respect of the Company’s compliance. The Market Abuse Regulation came into force across the EU on 3 July 2016 and has been retained and onshored in the UK following Brexit. The Board has taken steps to ensure that individual Directors (and their Persons Closely Associated) are aware of their obligations under the regulation and has updated internal processes, where necessary, to ensure the risk of non- compliance is effectively mitigated. Counterparty risk The potential loss that the Company could incur if a counterparty is unable (or unwilling) to perform on its commitments. The Company’s investment policy also permits the use of both exchange-traded and over-the-counter derivatives (including contracts for difference). Due diligence is undertaken before contracts are entered into and exposures are diversified across a number of counterparties. The Board reviews the controls put in place by the Investment Manager to monitor and to minimise counterparty exposure, which include intra-day monitoring of exposures to ensure that these are within set limits. The Depositary is liable for restitution for the loss of financial instruments held in custody, unless it is able to demonstrate that the loss was due to an event beyond its reasonable control. Viability statement The Directors have assessed the prospects of the Company over a longer period than the 12 months referred to by the “Going Concern” guidelines. The Board conducted this review for the period up to the AGM in 2028, being a five-year period from the date that this Annual Report will be approved by shareholders. This is generally the investment holding period investors consider while investing in the smaller companies’ sector. The Board is cognisant of the uncertainty surrounding the potential duration of the Russia/Ukraine conflict, its impact on the global economy, and the prospects for the Company’s portfolio holdings. In making its assessment the Board has also considered the following factors: • the Company’s principal risks as set out on pages 40 to 43; • the impact of a significant fall in UK equity markets on the value of the Company’s investment portfolio in the light of the heightened volatility resulting from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and the impact on the global economy, inflation and interest rates, of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine; • the ongoing relevance of the Company’s investment objective; and • the level of demand for the Company’s shares. The Directors have also considered the Company’s revenue and expense forecasts and the fact that expenses and liabilities are relatively stable. The Company also has a portfolio of investments which provides a level of cash receipts in the form of dividends and which are considered to be relatively realisable if required.

44 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 The Directors reviewed the assumptions and considerations underpinning the Company’s existing going concern assertion (please see the disclosure in the Directors’ Report on page 57), which are based on: • processes for monitoring costs; • key financial ratios; • evaluation of risk management and controls; • compliance with the investment objective; • the Company’s ability to meet its liabilities as they fall due; • portfolio risk profile; • share price discount to NAV; • gearing; • counterparty exposure and liquidity risk in the light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic; • the operational resilience of the Company and its key service providers and their ability to continue to provide a good level of service for the foreseeable future; and • the effectiveness of business continuity plans in place for the Company and key service providers. The Company has a relatively liquid portfolio and largely fixed overheads (excluding any applicable performance fees) which comprise a very small percentage of net assets (0.54% excluding performance fees, 0.54% including performance fees in 2022). The effective performance fee cap in the event that the NAV return exceeds the Benchmark Index return over the performance period is circa 0.90% of the average gross assets over the two years and the applicable percentage to be applied to the outperformance of the NAV total return over the Benchmark Index return is 15%. In addition, the maximum cap on total management and performance fees is 1.25% of average gross assets (measured over a rolling two-year period). Therefore, the Board has concluded that the Company would be able to meet its ongoing operating costs as they fall due. On 30 December 2020, the UK and the EU signed the UK/EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement (UK/EU Trade Agreement), which applied from 1 January 2021 and set out the foundation of the economic and legal framework for trade between the UK and the EU. The UK’s exit from the EU has resulted in additional trade costs and disruptions in this trading relationship. The terms of the future relationship may cause continued uncertainty in the global financial markets, and could potentially adversely affect the performance of the Company. Volatility resulting from this uncertainty may mean that the returns of the Company’s investments are affected by market movements, the potential decline in the value of Sterling or Euro, and the potential downgrading of UK sovereign credit rating. The Directors have also considered the impact of potential changes in law, regulation and taxation and the matter of foreign exchange risk. They have determined that although there are a number of potential risks associated with the legal, fiscal and regulatory landscape they do not believe that this represents a material threat to the Company’s strategy and business model, nor do they believe that the Investment Manager will be materially impeded in achieving the Company’s investment objective. Based on the results of their analysis, the Directors have a reasonable expectation that the Company will be able to continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over the period of their assessment. Strategic report continued

Section 3: Governance 45 Section 172 statement: Promoting the success of BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc The Companies (Miscellaneous Reporting) Regulations 2018 require directors to explain more fully how they have discharged their duties under Section 172(1) of the Companies Act 2006 in promoting the success of their companies for the benefit of members as a whole. This enhanced disclosure covers how the Board has engaged with and understands the views of stakeholders and how stakeholders’ needs have been taken into account, the outcome of this engagement and the impact that it has had on the Board’s decisions. As the Company is an externally managed investment company and does not have any employees or customers, the Board considers the main stakeholders in the Company to be the shareholders and the key service providers (being the Manager and Investment Manager, the Custodian, Depositary, Registrar and Broker). The reasons for this determination, and the Board’s overarching approach to engagement, are set out in the table below: Stakeholders Shareholders Manager and Investment Manager Other key service providers Continued shareholder support and engagement are critical to the continued existence of the Company and the successful delivery of its long- term strategy. The Board is focused on fostering good working relationships with shareholders and on understanding the views of shareholders in order to incorporate them into the Board’s strategy and objectives in delivering long-term growth and income. In turn, portfolio holdings are ultimately shareholders’ assets, and the Board recognises the importance of good stewardship and communication with investee companies in meeting the Company’s investment objective and strategy. The Board’s main working relationship is with the Manager, who is responsible for the Company’s portfolio management (including asset allocation, stock and sector selection) and risk management, as well as ancillary functions such as administration, secretarial, accounting and marketing services. The Manager has sub-delegated portfolio management to the Investment Manager. Successful management of shareholders’ assets by the Investment Manager is critical for the Company to successfully deliver its investment strategy and meet its objective. The Company is also reliant on the Manager as AIFM to provide support in meeting relevant regulatory obligations under the AIFMD and other relevant legislation. In order for the Company to function as an investment trust with a listing on the premium segment of the official list of the FCA and trade on the London Stock Exchange’s (LSE) main market for listed securities, the Board relies on a diverse range of advisors for support in meeting relevant obligations and safeguarding the Company’s assets. For this reason, the Board considers the Company’s Custodian, Depositary, Registrar and Broker to be stakeholders. The Board, either directly or through the Manager, maintains regular contact with its key external providers and receives regular reporting from them through the Board and Committee meetings, as well as outside of the regular meeting cycle.

46 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 A summary of the key areas of engagement undertaken by the Board with its key stakeholders in the year under review and how Directors have acted upon this to promote the long term success of the Company are set out in the table below. Area of Engagement Issue Engagement Impact Investment mandate and objective The Board is committed to promoting the role and success of the Company in delivering on its investment mandate to shareholders over the long term. The Board also has responsibility to shareholders to ensure that the Company’s portfolio of assets is invested in line with the stated investment objective and in a way that ensures an appropriate balance between spread of risk and portfolio returns. The Board works closely with the Investment Manager throughout the year in further developing our investment strategy and underlying policies, not simply for the purpose of achieving the Company’s investment objective but in the interests of shareholders and future investors. The Board is kept advised in respect of the Manager’s consideration of ESG factors as part of the investment process; a summary of BlackRock’s approach to ESG matters is set out on page 52. Details regarding the Company’s NAV and share price performance can be found in the Chairman’s Statement on pages 7 and 8 and in the Strategic Report on page 40. The portfolio activities undertaken by the Manager can be found in the Investment Manager’s Report on pages 13 to 17. Management of the share rating The Board believes that the best way of addressing the discount over the longer term is to continue to generate good performance and to create demand for the Company’s shares in the secondary market through broadening awareness of the Company’s unique structure. The Board believes that it is in shareholders’ interests that the share price does not trade at an excessive premium or discount to NAV. Therefore, where deemed to be in shareholders’ long term interests, it may exercise its powers to issue shares or buy back shares with the objective of ensuring that an excessive premium or discount does not arise. The Manager reports total return performance statistics to the Board on a regular basis, along with the portfolio yield and the impact of dividends paid on brought forward distributable reserves. The Board reviews the Company’s discount/premium to NAV on a regular basis and holds regular discussions with the Manager and the Company’s broker regarding the discount/premium level. The Board believes that the best way of maintaining the share rating at an optimal level over the long term is to create demand for the shares in the secondary market. To this end the Investment Manager is devoting considerable effort to broadening the awareness of the Company, particularly to wealth managers and to the wider retail shareholder market. The Manager provides the Board with feedback and key performance statistics regarding the success of the Company’s marketing initiatives. The average discount for the year to 30 November 2022 was 3.5%. During the year the Company’s share price has traded at a maximum discount of 14.3% and a maximum premium of 2.7%. Strategic report continued

Section 3: Governance 47 Area of Engagement Issue Engagement Impact Service levels of third party providers The Board acknowledges the importance of ensuring that the Company’s principal suppliers are providing a suitable level of service including: the Manager in respect of investment performance and delivering on the Company’s investment mandate; the Depositary in respect of its duties towards safeguarding the Company’s assets; the Registrar in its maintenance of the Company’s share register and dealing with investor queries and the Company’s Brokers in respect of the provision of advice and acting as a market maker for the Company’s shares. The Manager reports to the Board on the Company’s performance on a regular basis. The Board carries out a robust annual evaluation of the Manager’s performance, their commitment and available resources. The Board performs an annual review of the service levels of all third party service providers and concludes on their suitability to continue in their role. The Board has received updates in respect of business continuity planning from the Company’s Manager, Depositary, Fund Administrator, Brokers, Registrar and Printers, and is confident that arrangements are in place to ensure that a good level of service will continue to be provided. Performance evaluations were performed on a timely basis and the Board concluded that all third party service providers, including the Manager, Depositary and Fund Administrator were operating effectively and providing a good level of service. Board composition The Board is committed to ensuring that its own composition brings an appropriate balance of knowledge, experience and skills, and that it is compliant with best corporate governance practice under the UK Corporate Governance Code, including guidance on tenure and the composition of the Board’s committees. During the year the Board undertook a review of succession planning arrangements and identified the need for action to ensure that the composition of the Board remained appropriate and that there was an ongoing process of refreshment, bringing in new ideas and different perspectives. The Board, through its Nomination Committee, agreed the selection criteria and the method of selection, recruitment and appointment. Board diversity, including factors such as age, ethnicity, and gender, was taken into account when establishing the criteria. All Directors are subject to a formal evaluation process on an annual basis (more details and the conclusions in respect of the 2022 evaluation process are given on page 65). All Directors stand for re-election by shareholders annually. Shareholders may attend the AGM and raise any queries in respect of Board composition or individual Directors in person or may contact the Company Secretary or the Chairman using the details provided on page 124 if they wish to raise any issues. On 9 January 2023 the Board announced the appointment of a new Non-executive Director, Glen Suarez, further strengthening and divesifying the existing Board. Further information on Mr Suarez’s background and experience, and that of all the Directors, can be found on pages 33 to 36. As mentioned in the Chairman’s Statement on page 10, following nine years of diligent service on the Board Mr Greenlees has decided to step down as a Director at the conclusion of this year’s AGM. He will be suceeded as Chairman of the Company’s Audit Committee by an existing Director, Angela Lane. The Directors are not aware of any issues that have been raised directly by shareholders in respect of Board composition in 2022. Details for the proxy voting results in favour and against individual Directors’ re-election at the 2022 AGM are given on the Company’s website at www.blackrock.com/ uk/thrg.

48 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 Area of Engagement Issue Engagement Impact Shareholders Continued shareholder support and engagement are critical to the continued existence of the Company and the successful delivery of its long term strategy. The dividend is funded out of current year revenue and, where deemed appropriate, may be supported from revenue reserves if current year revenue is insufficient. The Company does not have a policy of seeking income, however, the portfolio has, to date, continued to deliver a level of income such that the Board is able to pay an attractive dividend. The Board is committed to maintaining open channels of communication and to engaging with shareholders and welcomes and encourages attendance and participation from shareholders at its Annual General Meetings. Shareholders therefore have the opportunity to meet the Directors and Investment Manager and to address questions to them directly. The Annual Report and Half Yearly financial report are available on the BlackRock website and are also circulated to shareholders either in printed copy or via electronic communications. In addition, regular updates on performance, monthly factsheets, the daily NAV and other information are also published on the website at www.blackrock. com/uk/thrg. The Board values any feedback and questions from shareholders ahead of and during Annual General Meetings in order to gain an understanding of their views and will take action when and as appropriate. Feedback and questions will also help the Company evolve its reporting, aiming to make reports more transparent and understandable. Feedback from all substantive meetings between the Investment Manager and shareholders will be shared with the Board. The Directors will also receive updates from the Company’s broker on any feedback from shareholders, as well as share trading activity, share price performance and an update from the Investment Manager. The Investment Manager attended professional investor meetings and held discussions with a range of different wealth management desks and offices in respect of the Company during the year under review. Investors were also impressed with the wide pool of resource available through BlackRock’s Emerging Companies team, and the rigorous ‘bottom- up’ investment approach. Strategic report continued

Section 3: Governance 49 Area of Engagement Issue Engagement Impact Shareholders (continued) The Board also works closely with the Manager to develop the Company’s marketing strategy, with the aim of ensuring effective communication with shareholders in respect of the investment mandate and objective. Unlike trading companies, shareholder meetings usually take the form of a meeting with the Investment Manager as opposed to members of the Board. As well as attending regular investor meetings the Investment Manager holds regular discussions with wealth management desks and offices to build on the case for, and understanding of, long term investment opportunities in the UK smaller companies’ sector. However, the Board is ultimately responsible for communication with shareholders and all substantive matters arising from such communication are referred to the Board. The Manager also coordinates public relations activity, including meetings between the Investment Manager and relevant industry publications to set out their vision for the portfolio strategy and outlook for the UK equity market. The Manager releases the daily NAV and monthly portfolio updates to the market to ensure that investors are kept up to date in respect of performance and other portfolio developments and maintains a website on behalf of the Company that contains relevant information in respect of the Company’s investment mandate and objective. If shareholders wish to raise issues or concerns with the Board, they are welcome to do so at any time. The Chairman is available to meet directly with shareholders periodically to understand their views on governance and the Company’s performance where they wish to do so. He may be contacted via the Company Secretary whose details are given on page 124.

50 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 Area of Engagement Issue Engagement Impact Responsible Investing Consideration of material Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) information and sustainability risks are considered when making investment decisions. Climate change is becoming a defining factor in companies’ long term prospects across the investment spectrum, with significant and lasting implications for economic growth and prosperity. The Board believes that responsible investment and sustainability are integral to the longer-term delivery of the Company’s success. The Board works closely with the Investment Manager to regularly review the Company’s performance, investment strategy and underlying policies to ensure that the Company’s investment objective continues to be met in an effective, responsible and sustainable way in the interests of shareholders and future investors. The Investment Manager’s approach to the consideration of ESG factors in respect of the Company’s information and consideration of sustainability risks are kept under review by the Board. The Investment Manager reports to the Board in respect of its consideration of sustainability risks and these are integrated into the investment process; a summary of BlackRock’s approach to ESG integration is set out on page 39. The Investment Manager’s engagement and voting policy is detailed on pages 56 and 57. The Investment Manager believes there is often a positive correlation between good ESG practices on the part of portfolio companies and investment performance. Details of the Company’s performance in the year are given in the Chairman’s Statement on pages 7 and 8 and the Performance Record on page 4. Strategic report continued

Section 3: Governance 51 The Board’s approach to ESG Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) issues can present both opportunities and threats to long term investment performance. The Company does not have an ESG mandate (and accordingly does not have an ESG or impact focused investment strategy and has not adopted any exclusionary screens) but our Investment Manager does take ESG factors into account as part of the investment process as these elements can significantly influence a company’s valuation. These ESG issues are a key focus of the Board, and the Board is committed to a diligent oversight of the activities of the Manager in these areas. The Board is aware of the Company’s long term underweight position in extractive industries, where innovative and disruptive business models are rare and the non-participation in some capital raises where ESG factors have been a concern. The Board believes multi-year engagement and dialogue with management is, in most cases, the most constructive way of building understanding of an investee company's approach to addressing material business risks and opportunities. This is particularly true for our Manager given the extent of BlackRock's shareholder engagement. Further detail of how our Manager has voted and engaged with the companies in our portfolio can be found on pages 56 and 57. As well as the understanding afforded by its sheer scale, the Board believes that BlackRock is well placed as Manager to fulfil these requirements due to its approach to ESG integration and its application of this to the Company’s investment processes, the emphasis it places on sustainability, its collaborative approach in its investment stewardship activities and its position in the industry as one of the largest suppliers of sustainable investment products in the global market. More information on BlackRock’s approach to sustainability and investment stewardship is set out on page 52. Future prospects The Board’s main focus is on the achievement of capital growth and the future of the Company is dependent upon the success of the investment strategy. The outlook for the Company is discussed in the Chairman’s Statement on page 11 and in the Investment Manager’s Report on pages 13 to 17. Social, community and human rights issues As an investment trust, the Company has no direct social or community responsibilities. However, the Company believes that it is in shareholders’ interests to consider human rights issues, and environmental, social and governance factors when selecting and retaining investments. Details of the Company’s approach to socially responsible investment is set out above and on page 52. Modern Slavery Act As an investment vehicle the Company does not provide goods or services in the normal course of business and does not have customers. Accordingly, the Directors consider that the Company is not required to make any slavery or human trafficking statement under the Modern Slavery Act 2015. The Board considers the Company’s supply chain, dealing predominantly with professional advisers and service providers in the financial services industry, to be low risk in relation to this matter. Directors, gender representation and employees The Directors of the Company on 30 November 2022, all of whom, with the exception of Glen Suarez who was appointed after the year end on 9 January 2023, held office throughout the year, are set out on pages 33 to 36. The Board recognises the importance of having a range of experienced Directors who, both individually and collectively, possess a suitable balance of skills, knowledge, independence and diversity to enable it to fulfil its obligations. As at 30 November 2022, the Board consisted of three men and three women, resulting in 50% female representation. Following Glen’s appointment this fell to 42% female representation. Following the retirement of Loudon Greenlees at the forthcoming AGM to be held on 23 March 2023 there will be 50:50 ratio of male and female Directors. The Company has no employees, and all of its Directors are non-executive. Therefore, there are no disclosures to be made in respect of employees. The Chairman’s Statement on pages 6 to 11 and the Investment Manager’s Report on pages 13 to 17 form part of this Strategic Report. The Strategic Report was approved by the Board at its meeting on 9 February 2023. By order of the Board KEVIN MAYGER for and on behalf of BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited Company Secretary 9 February 2023

52 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 Responsible ownership – BlackRock’s approach Consistent with BlackRock’s fiduciary duty as an asset manager, BlackRock Investment Stewardship (BIS) seeks to support investee companies in their efforts to deliver long-term durable financial performance on behalf of our clients. These clients include public and private pension plans, governments, insurance companies, endowments, universities, charities and, ultimately, individual investors, among others. BIS serves as an important link between BlackRock’s clients and the companies they invest in. Clients depend on BlackRock to help them meet their investment goals; the business and governance decisions that companies make will have a direct impact on BlackRock’s clients’ long- term investment outcomes and financial well-being. Global Principles BlackRock’s approach to corporate governance and stewardship is comprised in BIS’ Global Principles and market-specific voting guidelines. BIS’ policies set out the core elements of corporate governance that guide its investment stewardship activities globally and within each regional market, including when voting at shareholder meetings for those clients who have authorized BIS to vote on their behalf. Each year, BIS reviews its policies and updates them as necessary to reflect changes in market standards and regulations, insights gained over the year through third-party and its own research, and feedback from clients and companies. BIS’ Global Principles are available on its website at www.blackrock.com/corporate/literature/fact- sheet/blk-responsible-investment-engprinciples-global.pdf Market-specific proxy voting guidelines BIS’ voting guidelines are intended to help clients and companies understand its thinking on key governance matters. They are the benchmark against which it assesses a company’s approach to corporate governance and the items on the agenda to be voted on at the shareholder meeting. BIS applies its guidelines pragmatically, taking into account a company’s unique circumstances where relevant. BlackRock informs voting decisions through research and engages as necessary. BIS reviews its voting guidelines annually and updates them as necessary to reflect changes in market standards, evolving governance practice and insights gained from engagement over the prior year. BIS’ market-specific voting guidelines are available on its website at www.blackrock.com/corporate/about-us/ investment-stewardship#stewardship-policies. BIS also publishes voting bulletins explaining its voting decisions, and the engagement and analysis underpinning it, on certain high-profile proposals at company shareholder meetings. Vote bulletins for 2022 can be found at www.blackrock.com/corporate/about-us/investment- stewardship#vote-bulletins. BlackRock is committed to transparency in terms of disclosure on its stewardship activities on behalf of clients. BIS publishes its stewardship policies – such as www.blackrock.com/corporate/literature/fact-sheet/blk- responsible-investment-engprinciples-global.pdf Global Principles, www.blackrock.com/corporate/literature/ publication/blk-stewardship-priorities-final.pdf engagement priorities, and www.blackrock.com/corporate/about-us/ investment-stewardship#stewardship-policies – to help BlackRock’s clients understand its work to advance their interests as long-term investors in public companies. Additionally, BIS published both annual and quarterly www.blackrock.com/corporate/about-us/investment- stewardship#stewardship-reports detailing its stewardship activities, as well as www.blackrock.com/corporate/about- us/investment-stewardship#vote-bulletins that describe its rationale for certain votes at high profile shareholder meetings. More detail in respect of BIS reporting can be found at www.blackrock.com/corporate/about-us/ investment-stewardship BlackRock’s reporting and disclosures In terms of its own reporting, BlackRock believes that the SASB provides a clear set of standards for reporting sustainability information across a wide range of issues, from labour practices to data privacy to business ethics. For evaluating and reporting climate-related risks, as well as the related governance issues that are essential to managing them, the TCFD provides a valuable framework. BlackRock recognises that reporting to these standards requires significant time, analysis and effort. BlackRock’s 2021 TCFD report can be found at www.blackrock.com/ corporate/literature/continuous-disclosure-and-important- information/tcfd-report-2021-blkinc.pdf. The above forms part of the Strategic Report. Responsible ownership: BlackRock’s approach to sustainable investing

54 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 The Directors present the Annual Report and Financial Statements of the Company for the year ended 30 November 2022. Status of the Company The Company carries on business as an investment trust. It has been approved by HM Revenue & Customs as an investment trust in accordance with Sections 1158 and 1159 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010, subject to the Company continuing to meet eligibility conditions. The Directors are of the opinion that the Company has conducted its affairs in a manner which will satisfy the conditions for continued approval. The Company is domiciled in the UK as an investment company within the meaning of Section 833 of the Companies Act 2006. It is not a close company and has no employees. As an investment company that is managed and marketed in the United Kingdom, the Company is an Alternative Investment Fund (AIF) falling within the scope of, and subject to the requirements of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers’ Directive (AIFMD) (as implemented and transposed into UK law). The Company is governed by the provisions of the UK Alternative Investment Fund Managers Regulations 2013 (the Regulations) and is required to be authorised by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). It must comply with a number of obligations, including the appointment of an Alternative Investment Fund Manager (AIFM) and a depositary to carry out certain functions. The Company must also comply with the Regulations in respect of leverage, outsourcing, conflicts of interest, risk management, valuation, remuneration and capital requirements and must also make additional disclosures to both shareholders and the FCA. Further details are set out on the BlackRock website at blackrock.com/uk/thrg, the Regulatory Disclosures section on pages 125 to 130 and in note 16 of the Notes to the Financial Statements on pages 103 to 115. The Company’s ordinary shares are eligible for inclusion in the Stocks & Shares component of an Individual Savings Account (ISA). Facilitating retail investments The Company currently conducts its affairs so that its shares can be recommended by an Independent Financial Advisor to ordinary retail investors in accordance with the FCA’s rules in relation to non-mainstream pooled investments and intends to continue to do so for the foreseeable future. The shares are excluded from the FCA’s restrictions which apply to non- mainstream pooled investments because they are shares in an investment trust. The Common Reporting Standard Tax legislation under The OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) Common Reporting Standard for Automatic Exchange of Financial Account Information (The Common Reporting Standard) was introduced on 1 January 2016. The legislation requires investment trust companies to provide personal information to HMRC about investors who purchase shares in investment trusts. The Company will have to provide information annually to the local tax authority on the tax residencies of a number of non-UK based certificated shareholders, and corporate entities. The local tax authority to which the information is initially passed may in turn exchange the information with the tax authorities of another country or countries in which the shareholder may be tax resident, where those countries (or tax authorities in those countries) have entered into agreements to exchange financial account information. All new shareholders entered onto the share register, excluding those whose shares are held in CREST, will be sent a certification form for the purposes of collecting this information. Dividends Details of dividends paid and payable are set out in the Chairman’s Statement on page 9. Investment management and administration BlackRock Fund Managers Limited (BFM) was appointed as the Company’s AIFM with effect from 2 July 2014. The management contract is terminable by either party on six months’ notice. BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited (BIM (UK)) continues to act as the Company’s Investment Manager under a delegation agreement with BFM. BIM (UK) also acted as the Company Secretary of the Company throughout the year. BFM receives a base management fee of 0.35% of gross assets per annum (calculated on the month end gross assets of the Company, including the economic exposure of the total long and short positions and index futures less current liabilities). BFM is also entitled to a performance fee of 15% of Net Asset Value (NAV) total return outperformance of the Benchmark Index measured and annualised on a two-year rolling basis and applied on the average gross assets over two years. The performance fee has an effective cap of circa 0.9% of average gross assets over that period. Outperformance is the amount by which the Fund Return arithmetically exceeds the Benchmark Return. The cap applies as a result of the maximum cap on total management and performance fees of 1.25% of average gross assets over a rolling two-year period. The fee structure also includes a mechanism by which any cumulative previous underperformance versus the Benchmark Index return must be made good before any future performance fee can be generated. Conversely, any outperformance which has not been remunerated as a result of the application of the maximum cap on total fees of 1.25% (as above) may be carried forward solely for the purposes of being applied to net off against any underperformance not yet made good. The performance fee model for the Company operates on a rolling two-year period, with an effective Directors’ report

Section 3: Governance 55 annual cap of circa 0.9% on average gross assets over two years. On the first day of the financial year outperformance from the previous financial year (if any) is carried forward and accrued in the daily NAV released to the London Stock Exchange. For the year ended 30 November 2022 a performance fee of £nil (2021: £6,655,000) was payable to the Manager as a result of the outperformance generated. The Board believes that the fee structure is appropriately aligned to the Company’s activities, investment objective and shareholder interests. The low base fee minimises the costs borne by shareholders, whilst the performance fee is designed to reward the Manager at a level acceptable to shareholders for the generation of superior performance. Further details of the management fees are disclosed in note 4 on page 96. No penalty on termination of the investment management agreement is payable by the Company in the event that six months’ written notice is given to BFM. There are no provisions relating to payment of fees in lieu of notice. The Company contributes to a focused investment trust sales and marketing initiative operated by BIM (UK) on behalf of the investment trusts under its management. The Company’s contribution to the consortium element of the initiative, which enables the trusts to achieve efficiencies by combining certain sales and marketing activities, represented 0.025% per annum of its net assets (£984.5 million as at 31 December 2021) and this contribution is matched by BIM (UK). For the year ended 30 November 2022, £153,000 including VAT (2021: £157,000 including VAT) has been accrued in respect of these initiatives. The purpose of the programme overall is to ensure effective communication with existing shareholders and to attract new shareholders to the Company. This has the benefit of improving liquidity in the Company’s shares and helps sustain the stock market rating of the Company. BFM and BIM (UK) are subsidiaries of BlackRock, Inc. which is a publicly traded corporation on the New York Stock Exchange and operating as an independent firm. Appointment of the Manager The Board considers the arrangements for the provision of investment management and other services to the Company on an ongoing basis and a formal review is conducted annually. As part of the annual review, the Board considers the quality and continuity of the personnel assigned to handle the Company’s affairs, the investment process and the results achieved to date. The Board believes that the continuing appointment of BFM (the Manager) as AIFM, and the delegation of investment management services to BIM (UK) (the Investment Manager), on the terms disclosed above, is in the interests of shareholders as a whole. The specialist nature of the Company’s investment remit is, in the Board’s view, best served by the Emerging Companies team at BlackRock, which has a proven track record in successfully investing in this sector. Depositary and Custodian The Company has appointed The Bank of New York Mellon (International) Limited as its Depositary (the Depositary or BNYM). Its duties and responsibilities are outlined in the investment fund legislation (as contained in the FCA AIF Rulebook). The main role of the Depositary under the AIFMD is to act as a central custodian with additional duties to monitor the operations of the Company, including monitoring cash flows and ensuring the value of the Company’s shares is calculated appropriately in accordance with the relevant regulations and guidance. The Depositary is also responsible for enquiring into the conduct of the AIFM in each annual accounting period. The Depositary receives a fee payable at 0.0095% of the net assets of the Company. The Company has appointed the Depositary in a tripartite agreement to which BFM as AIFM is also a signatory. The Depositary is also liable for loss of financial instruments held in custody. Under the depositary agreement, custody services in respect of the Company’s assets have been delegated to BNYM which also receives a custody fee payable by the Company at rates depending on the number of trades effected and the location of securities held. Custody fees of £8,000 (2021: £12,000) were paid to BNYM. The depositary agreement is subject to 90 days’ notice of termination by any party. Registrar The Company has appointed Computershare Investor Services PLC as its Registrar (the Registrar). The principal duty of the Registrar is the maintenance of the register of shareholders (including registering transfers). It also provides services in relation to any corporate actions, dividend administration, shareholder documentation and compliance with the Common Reporting Standard. The Registrar receives a fixed fee, plus disbursements and VAT. Fees in respect of corporate actions are negotiated as and when they arise. Registrar fees of £45,000 (2021: £47,000) were paid to the Registrar. Derivative counterparties The Company transacts with multiple counterparties for transacting in derivatives. At 30 November 2022, the Company had master agreements with BNP Paribas, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank AG and JPMorgan, to enable the Company to gain long and short exposure on individual securities through derivatives. Further details are given in note 16 on pages 103 to 115.

56 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 Change of control There are no agreements which the Company is party to that might be affected by a change in control of the Company. Exercise of voting rights in investee companies The exercise of voting rights attached to the Company’s portfolio has been delegated to the Investment Manager, whose policy is set out below. BlackRock’s approach to voting at shareholder meetings, engagement with companies and corporate governance is framed within an investment context. BlackRock believes that sound corporate governance and sustainable business models contribute to companies’ long-term financial performance and thus to better risk- adjusted returns. BlackRock’s proxy voting process is led by the BlackRock Investment Stewardship (BIS) team, located in ten offices around the world. Collectively within BIS, 18 languages are spoken and 31 academic disciplines are represented. The team’s globally-coordinated, local presence and breadth of experience enables more frequent and better-informed dialogue with companies. The BIS team draws upon its own expertise, as well as other internal and external resources globally, to represent the long-term economic interests of clients. Close collaboration takes place between BIS and active portfolio managers. Active portfolio managers with positions in a company can vote their shares independently of BIS based on their views of what is best for their specific fund and client base. BIS’ Global Principles and market-specific proxy voting guidelines, updated every year, form the foundation of the team’s engagement with companies and voting decisions at shareholder meetings on behalf of clients. The voting guidelines are principles-based and not prescriptive because BlackRock believes that each voting situation needs to be assessed on its merits. Voting decisions are taken to support the outcome that BlackRock believes is in the best economic interests of clients. The Global Principles are published on BlackRock’s website at: www.blackrock.com/corporate/literature/fact-sheet/blk- responsible-investmentengprinciples-global.pdf During the year under review, the Investment Manager voted on 1,411 proposals at 92 general meetings on behalf of the Company. At these meetings the Investment Manager voted in favour of most resolutions, as should be expected when investing in well-run companies, but voted against 59 management resolutions and abstained or withheld from voting on 16 resolutions. Most of the votes against were in respect of proposals which contained insufficient disclosure for the Investment Manager to make an informed decision, or in respect of executive remuneration packages which were considered to be poorly structured. BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc – engagement with portfolio companies in 2022 Given the Board’s belief in the importance of engagement and communication with portfolio companies, it receives regular updates from the Manager in respect of activity undertaken for the year under review. The Board notes that over the year to 30 November 2022, BlackRock’s Investment Stewardship team conducted a total of 58 company engagements with the management teams of 46 portfolio companies representing 49.0% of the portfolio by value at 30 November 2022. To put this into context, there were 94 companies in the BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc portfolio at 30 November 2022. Additional information is set out in the table and charts below as well as the key engagement themes for the meetings held in respect of the Company’s portfolio holdings. As at 30 November 2022 Number of engagements held 58 Number of companies met 46 % of equity investments covered 49.0 Shareholder meetings voted at 92 Number of proposals voted on 1,411 Number of votes against management 59 % of total votes represented by votes against management 4.1% Directors’ report continued

Section 3: Governance 57 68.8% 13.8% 17.5% Engagement themes * 1 Governance Social Environmental Top 6 Engagement Topics * 1 Board Composition & Effectiveness Governance Structure Climate Risk Management Human Capital Management Corporate Strategy Remuneration 52% 9% 17% 21% 10% 53% * Engagements include multiple company meetings during the year with the same company. Most engagement conversations cover multiple topics and are based on BlackRock vote guidelines and BlackRock’s engagement priorities can be found at: www.blackrock.com/corporate/about-us/investment- stewardship#engagement-priorities. Percentages reflect the number of meetings at which a particular topic is discussed as a percentage of the total meetings held; as more than one topic is discussed at each meeting the total will not add up to 100%. 1 Sources: ISS Proxy Exchange and BlackRock Investment Stewardship. Principal risks The key risks faced by the Company are set out in the Strategic Report on pages 40 to 43. Going concern The Financial Statements of the Company have been prepared on a going concern basis. The forecast projections and actual performance are reviewed on a regular basis throughout the year and the Directors believe that this is the appropriate basis, and the Company has adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future, being a period of at least 12 months from the date these Financial Statements were approved, and is financially sound. The Company is able to meet all of its liabilities from its assets and the 2022 ongoing charges (excluding performance fees) are approximately 0.54% (2021: 0.57%) of the net assets. Directors Having carefully considered the Board’s composition and the need to ensure that a suitable balance of skills, knowledge, experience, independence and diversity is maintained, it was agreed to commence a search and selection process to identify new Directors in 2022. To assist them in their search for the right candidates the Board engaged an independent third party recruitment firm, Fletcher Jones Limited. Following a thorough and detailed search, the Board resolved to appoint Glen Suarez to the Board. All of the Directors held office throughout the year under review, with the exception of Glen Suarez, who was appointed with effect from 9 January 2023. Details of Directors’ interests in the ordinary shares of the Company are set out in the Report of the Remuneration Committee on pages 69 to 72. Further information on the Directors of the Company as at 30 November 2022 and as at the date of this report can be found on pages 33 to 36. All appointments to the Board and re-elections of Directors are carried out in accordance with the Companies Act and the Company’s Articles of Association. The Company’s Articles of Association provide that one third of Directors retire by rotation each year. In addition, each Director shall retire and offer themselves for re-election at intervals of no more than three years. The Board may also appoint Directors but any Director so appointed must stand for election by the shareholders at the next Annual General Meeting. Directors are also required to retire if they have served more than nine years on the Board and then may offer themselves for annual re-election. However, in accordance with best practice and the recommendations of the UK Code of Corporate Governance, the Board has agreed that all Directors will retire each year and if eligible, will offer themselves for re-election at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting (AGM) to be held on 23 March 2023. The Board has considered the position of all Directors standing for re-election at the AGM and believes that it is in the Company’s best interests to support the respective resolutions. The Board therefore recommends that shareholders vote in favour of these resolutions. The Board ensures that each Director has sufficient time to discharge their role and considers both the number and nature of their other commitments, the time commitment required and overall capacity. This may include a detailed review of their time spent on other activities. Any new external appointments must first be approved by the Board and the Director concerns must demonstrate that they have sufficient time to carry out the new role. Before recommending a Director for re-election their time capacity, independence, attendance record and ongoing commitment to the affairs of the Company are considered. A formal evaluation of their performance is also carried out each year. The Board has specifically considered the time commitment required of the Chairman, noting that he has various other

58 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 roles, including another chairmanship at a listed company. The Chairman has provided the Board with a detailed breakdown of his time commitments and a description of the work he undertakes. The Board, noting that many of his other roles are at investment companies, has formed the opinion that his other directorships, in aggregate, are reasonable and do not negatively impact on his ability to discharge his duties to the Company. Moreover, the Board has noted that he commits a significant amount of time to the Company and demonstrates dedication in his role as Chairman of the Board. Having considered the Directors’ performance within the annual Board performance evaluation process, further details of which are provided on page 65, the Board believes that it continues to be effective and that the Directors bring extensive knowledge and experience, suitably aligned to the activities of the Company, and demonstrate a range of valuable business, financial and asset management skills, as set out in the table above. Further details of their experience and expertise can be found in their biographies on pages 33 to 36. Further details of the independence of the Board and Board tenure is provided in the Corporate Governance Report on page 62. There were no contracts subsisting during the year under review or up to the date of this report in which a Director of the Company is or was materially interested and which is or was significant in relation to the Company’s business. None of the Directors is entitled to compensation for loss of office on the takeover of the Company. None of the Directors has a service contract with the Company. Conflicts of interest The Board has put in place a framework for Directors to report conflicts of interest or potential conflicts of interest. All Directors are required to notify the Company Secretary of any situations, or potential situations where they consider that they have or may have, a direct or indirect interest or duty that conflicts or possibly conflicts with the interests of the Company. All new situations, or changes to previously reported situations are reviewed on an individual basis and reviewed at each meeting. Directors are also reminded at each meeting that there remains a continuing obligation to notify the Company Secretary of any new situations that may arise or any changes that may occur to a previously notified situation. The Board considers that the framework has worked effectively throughout the year. Directors’ remuneration report and policy The Directors’ Remuneration Report can be found within the Report of the Remuneration Committee on pages 69 to 72. An advisory ordinary resolution to approve this report will be put to shareholders at the Company’s AGM. The Company is also required to put the Directors’ Remuneration Policy to a binding shareholder vote every three years. The Company’s Remuneration Policy was last put to shareholders at the AGM in 2020, therefore, an ordinary resolution to approve the policy will be put to shareholders at the forthcoming AGM to be held on 23 March 2023. Further details can be found in the Notice of AGM on page 136 and the Remuneration Policy can be found on pages 73 and 74. Directors’ responsibilities The Directors’ responsibilities in preparing these Financial Statements are noted on page 79. Substantial share interests As at 30 November 2022 and as at the date of this report, the following investors had declared a notifiable interest of 3% or more in the Company’s voting rights. Shareholder Number of Ordinary shares % of issued share capital 1 Brewin Dolphin 13,714,472 13.5% Investec Wealth & Management 5,728,500 5.6% Rathbones 4,742,381 4.6% 1 Based upon 101,158,864 shares in issue at the year end. Directors’ report continued Director Asset and Investment Management Finance and/or Accounting Investment Trust experience Marketing and Distribution Corporate Strategy and Finance Christopher Samuel ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ Loudon Greenlees ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ Merrryn Somerset Webb ✔ ✔ ✔ Nigel Burton ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ Louise Nash ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ Angela Lane ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Section 3: Governance 59 As at 7 February 2023, the following investors had declared a notifiable interest in the Company’s voting rights: Shareholder Number of Ordinary shares % of issued share capital 2 Brewin Dolphin 13,611,293 13.4% Investec Wealth & Management 5,692,584 5.6% Rathbones 4,732,966 4.6% 2 Based upon 101,113,864 shares in issue at the year end. Articles of Association Any amendments to the Company’s Articles of Association must be made by a special resolution of the members of the Company. Share capital Details of the Company’s share capital and voting rights are given in note 14 on page 102. Details of the voting rights in the Company’s shares as at the date of this report are also given in note 16 to the Notice of Annual General Meeting on page 139. The ordinary shares carry the right to receive dividends and have one voting right per ordinary share. There are no restrictions on the voting rights of the ordinary shares or on the transfer of the ordinary shares. There are no shares which carry specific rights with regard to the control of the Company. Share issues and repurchases The Board believes that the best way to address any discount over the longer term is to generate good performance and to create demand for the Company’s shares in the secondary market through effective marketing to drive awareness of the Company’s unique structure, robust investment process and long term investment track record in an attractive sector that is difficult to navigate. In support of this activity, and where deemed to be in shareholders’ long-term interests, the Board may exercise its powers to issue or buy back shares with the objective of ensuring that neither an excessive discount or premium to NAV arises. The Board considers several factors in determining whether the discount or premium to NAV at which the Company’s shares trade is excessive or otherwise. These may include but are not limited to: whether the share rating is commensurate with the peer group of UK Smaller Companies and whether the Company’s shares are trading in normal market conditions; the ongoing attractiveness of the investment proposition, in particular the strength of the portfolio management team and process; and the strong long-term performance delivered for shareholders, both in absolute and relative terms. Although the Manager initiates any buybacks, the policy and parameters are set by the Board and reviewed at regular intervals. If needed, the Company would raise any cash required to finance the purchase of such shares either by selling securities in the Company’s portfolio or by short term borrowing. The Directors believe that it is in shareholders’ interests to ensure that the Company has, at all times, the ability to buy back shares and to issue new shares or sell shares from treasury in order to manage any excessive share price premium to NAV that may arise. Although the Manager initiates any buybacks, the policy and parameters would be set by the Board and reviewed at regular intervals. If needed, the Company would raise any cash required to finance the purchase of such shares either by selling securities in the Company’s portfolio or by short- term borrowing. The Directors believe that it is in shareholders’ interests to ensure that the Company has, at all times, the ability to buy back shares and to issue new shares or sell shares from treasury in order to manage any excessive share price premium to NAV that may arise. The current authority to repurchase ordinary shares was granted to Directors on 24 March 2022 and expires at the conclusion of the AGM in 2023. The Directors are therefore proposing that their authority to buy-back shares to be held in treasury, or for cancellation, and to issue new shares or sell shares from treasury be renewed at the forthcoming AGM. Treasury shares The Company is authorised to purchase its own ordinary shares to be held in treasury for reissue or cancellation at a future date. As at 30 November 2022, 2,051,000 shares were held in treasury (2021: nil shares). Treasury shares will only be reissued at prices at or above the prevailing NAV per share thereby giving the Company the ability to reissue shares quickly and cost effectively, improving liquidity and providing the Company with additional flexibility in the management of its capital base. It also ensures a positive overall effect for shareholders when shares are bought back at a discount and then sold at a price at or above the NAV per share. Streamlined Energy & Carbon Reporting scheme (SECR) statement: greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and energy consumption disclosure As an externally managed investment company, the Company has no greenhouse gas emissions to report from its operations, nor does it have any responsibility for any other emissions producing sources under the Companies Act (Strategic Report and Directors’ Reports) Regulations 2013.

60 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 For the same reason, the Company considers itself to be a low energy user under the SECR regulations and therefore is not required to disclose energy and carbon information. Business of the AGM AGM Arrangements UK government restrictions on public gatherings are no longer in force in connection with COVID-19 and we therefore intend to hold the AGM in the normal way with physical attendance by shareholders. However, shareholders should be aware that it is possible that restrictions could be reimposed prior to the date of the AGM. BlackRock requests that shareholders intending to attend should comply with their COVID-19 safety protocols before entering the venue. At the time of writing, visitors are not permitted in BlackRock’s offices if they have tested positive for COVID-19 in the past 10 days, are experiencing COVID-19 related symptoms, or are subject to government requirements for self-isolation or quarantine. The following information to be discussed at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting is important and requires your immediate attention. If you are in any doubt about the action you should take, you should seek advice from your stockbroker, bank manager, solicitor, accountant or other financial adviser authorised under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (as amended). If you have sold or transferred all of your ordinary shares in the Company, you should pass this document, together with any other accompanying documents including the form of proxy, at once to the purchaser or transferee, or to the stockbroker, bank or other agent through whom the sale or transfer was effected, for onward transmission to the purchaser or transferee. The business of this year’s AGM consists of 16 resolutions. Resolutions 1 to 13 are proposed as ordinary resolutions and resolutions 14 to 16 are being proposed as special resolutions. Ordinary Resolution 1 – Annual Report and Financial Statements This resolution seeks shareholder approval to receive the report of the Directors and Financial Statements for the year ended 30 November 2022 and the Auditor’s report thereon. Ordinary Resolution 2 – Approval of the Directors’ Remuneration Report This resolution is an advisory vote on the Directors’ Remuneration Report for the year ending 30 November 2022, excluding any content relating to the proposed future remuneration policy as set out on pages 73 and 74. Resolution 3 - Approval of the Directors’ Remuneration Policy This is a binding resolution to approve the Directors’ Remuneration Policy as set out on pages 73 and 74. Ordinary Resolution 4 – Approval of a final dividend This resolution seeks shareholder approval of a final dividend of 8.50 pence for the year ended 30 November 2022. Ordinary Resolutions 5 to 10 – Election or Re-election of the Directors Resolutions 5 to 10 relate to the re-election of the Directors. The Board has undertaken a formal performance evaluation during the year and confirms that the performance of the Directors standing for re-election continues to be effective and that each Director continues to demonstrate commitment to their role and has confirmed with each Director, and specifically with the Chairman of the Board, that they have sufficient time to effectively discharge their duties to the Company. Their biographies on pages 33 to 36 provide details of their collective expertise and experience. The Board believes their re-appointment is in the best interests of shareholders and will promote the long term success of the Company. Ordinary Resolutions 11 and 12 – Appointment of the external Auditor and the Auditor’s Remuneration These resolutions relate to the re-appointment and remuneration of the Company’s auditor. The Company, through its Audit Committee, has considered the independence and objectivity of the external auditor and is satisfied that the Auditor is independent. Further information in relation to the assessment of the existing Auditor’s independence can be found in the Report of the Audit Committee on pages 77 and 78. Resolutions relating to the following items of special business will be proposed at the forthcoming AGM. Ordinary Resolution 13 – Authority to allot ordinary shares The Directors may only allot shares for cash if authorised to do so by shareholders in a general meeting. This resolution seeks authority for the Directors to allot shares for cash up to an aggregate nominal amount of £505,569.32 per annum, which is equivalent to 10,113,864 ordinary shares of 5p each and represents 10% of the Company’s issued ordinary share capital (excluding treasury shares) as at the date of the Notice of the AGM. This resolution will expire at the conclusion of the AGM of the Company to be held in 2024 unless renewed prior to that date at an earlier general meeting. All shares issued under this authority would be at a premium to the prevailing NAV. Directors’ report continued

Section 3: Governance 61 Special Resolution 14 – Authority to disapply pre-emption rights By law, Directors require specific authority from shareholders before allotting new shares or selling shares out of treasury for cash without first offering them to existing shareholders in proportion to their holdings. Resolution 14 empowers the Directors to allot new shares for cash or to sell shares held by the Company in treasury, otherwise than to existing shareholders on a pro rata basis, up to an aggregate nominal amount of £505,569.32 which is equivalent to 10,113,864 ordinary shares of 5p each and represents 10% of the Company’s issued ordinary share capital (excluding treasury shares) as at the date of the Notice of the AGM. This resolution, which is subject to the passing of ordinary resolution 13, will expire at the conclusion of the AGM of the Company to be held in 2024 unless renewed prior to that date at an earlier general meeting. All shares issued under this authority would be at a premium to the prevailing NAV. Special Resolution 15 – Authority to buy back ordinary shares The resolution to be proposed will seek to renew the authority granted to Directors enabling the Company to purchase its own ordinary shares. The Directors will only consider repurchasing shares in the market if they believe it to be in shareholders’ interests and as a means of correcting any imbalance between supply and demand for the Company’s shares. The Directors are seeking authority to purchase up to 15,156,968 ordinary shares (being 14.99% of the issued ordinary share capital excluding treasury shares as at the date of this report). This authority, unless renewed at an earlier general meeting, will expire at the conclusion of the AGM of the Company to be held in 2024. Any ordinary shares purchased pursuant to this resolution shall be cancelled immediately upon completion of the purchase or held, sold, transferred or otherwise dealt with as treasury shares in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act. Special Resolution 16 – Notice period for General Meetings Special Resolution 16 empowers the Directors to hold general meetings (other than annual general meetings) on 14 days’ notice, which is the minimum notice period permitted by the Companies Act 2006. The EU Shareholder Rights Directive increases the minimum notice period to 21 days unless two conditions are met. The first condition is that the Company offers facilities for shareholders to vote by electronic means. The second condition is that there is an annual resolution of shareholders approving the reduction in the minimum notice period from 21 days to 14 days, hence this resolution being proposed. It is not intended that this power will be used as a matter of course, rather that this flexibility will be utilised where the Board believes that the nature of the business to be conducted requires that a general meeting be convened at 14 days’ notice. Recommendation The Board considers that each of the resolutions to be proposed at the Annual General Meeting is likely to promote the success of the Company for the benefit of its members as a whole and is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders as a whole. The Directors unanimously recommend that shareholders vote in favour of these resolutions as they intend to do in respect of their own beneficial holdings. As mentioned in the Chairman’s statement, if you are unable to attend the meeting in person you can cast your vote by proxy, either by appointing the chairman as your proxy or alternatively a third party. Details on how to do so are included on the Proxy Card provided. If you hold your shares through a Nominee or Platform you will need to contact them directly to instruct them on how you wish to vote or to request that they appoint you as a proxy in respect of your shareholding should you wish to attend the meeting. It may also be possible to vote electronically via the platform. If you are able to do so we would encourage shareholders to exercise your vote. Corporate Governance Full details are given in the Corporate governance statement on pages 63 to 68. The Corporate Governance Statement forms part of this Directors’ Report. Audit information As required by Section 418 of the Companies Act 2006 the Directors who held office at the date of approval of this Directors’ Report confirm that, so far as they are aware, there is no relevant audit information of which the Company’s auditor is unaware; and each Director has taken all the steps that they ought to have taken as a Director to make themselves aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that the Company’s auditor is aware of that information. Independent Auditor In line with EU regulations on mandatory audit rotation, an audit tender process was carried out by the Company during 2018. Following this process, and on the recommendation of the Company’s Audit Committee, the Board resolved that PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP be appointed as the Company’s independent auditor for the financial year commencing on 1 December 2018. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP have audited the Company’s Financial Statements for the year ending 30 November 2022.

62 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 A resolution to re-appoint PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as auditor of the Company will be proposed at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting, together with a resolution to authorise the Audit Committee to determine its remuneration. The Directors’ Report was approved by the Board at its meeting on 9 February 2023. By order of the Board KEVIN MAYGER for and on behalf of BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited Company Secretary 9 February 2023 Directors’ report continued

Section 3: Governance 63 Introduction Corporate governance is one of the processes by which the Board seeks to safeguard shareholders’ interests and protect and enhance shareholder value. Shareholders hold the Directors responsible for the stewardship of the Company, delegating authority and responsibility to the Directors to manage the Company on their behalf and holding them accountable for its performance. The Board is ultimately responsible for framing and executing the Company’s strategy and for closely monitoring risks. We aim to run the Company in a manner which is responsible and consistent with our belief in honesty, transparency and accountability. In our view, good governance means managing the business well and engaging effectively with investors. We consider the practice of good governance to be an integral part of the way we manage the Company, and we are committed to maintaining high standards of financial reporting, transparency and business integrity. As a UK-listed investment trust company our principal reporting obligation is driven by the UK Corporate Governance Code (the UK Code). However, as listed investment trust companies differ in many ways from other listed companies, the Association of Investment Companies has drawn up its own set of guidelines, the AIC Code of Corporate Governance (the AIC Code), which addresses the governance issues relevant to investment companies and meets the approval of the Financial Reporting Council. The UK Code is available from the Financial Reporting Council’s website at frc.org.uk. The AIC Code is available from the Association of Investment Companies at www.theaic.co.uk. This report, which forms part of the Directors’ Report, explains how the Board deals with its responsibility, authority and accountability. Compliance The Board has made the appropriate disclosures in this report to ensure that the Company meets its continuing obligations. It should be noted that, as an investment trust, most of the Company’s day-to-day responsibilities are delegated to third party service providers, the Company has no employees and the Directors are all non-executives, therefore not all the provisions of the UK Code are directly applicable to the Company. The Board considers that the Company has complied with the recommendations of the AIC Code and the provisions contained within the UK Code that are relevant to the Company throughout the accounting period, except for those relating to: • the role of the chief executive; • executive directors’ remuneration; and • the need for an internal audit function. For the reasons set out in the AIC Guide, and explained in the UK Code, the Board considers these provisions are not relevant to the position of the Company, being an externally managed investment company with no executive employees and, in relation to internal audit function, in view of BlackRock having an internal audit function. Information on how the Company has applied the principles of the AIC Code and the UK Code is set out below. The Board Board composition As at 30 November 2022 the Board consisted of six Non-executive Directors. As at the date of this report the Board consists of seven Non-executive Directors, all of whom are independent of the Company’s Manager. This is a higher number than usual in order to facilitate the orderly transition of a retiring director and a newly appointed director. Following the AGM in March the number of directors will reduce to six. The provision of the UK Corporate Governance Code which relates to the combination of the roles of the chairman and chief executive does not apply as the Company has no executive directors. The Directors’ biographies, on pages 33 to 36, demonstrate a breadth of investment knowledge, business and financial experience relevant to the Company’s business which enables the Board to provide effective strategic leadership and proper governance of the Company. Details of the Chairman’s other significant time commitments can also be found on page 33. Board independence and tenure The Board’s independence, including that of the Chairman, has been considered and all of the Directors are deemed to be independent in character and have no relationships or circumstances which are likely to affect their judgement. The Board subscribes to the view expressed in the AIC Code that long-serving Directors should not be prevented from forming part of an independent majority. It does not consider that the length of tenure, in isolation, reduces a Director’s ability to act independently. The Board’s policy on tenure is that continuity and experience add significantly to the strength of the Board and, as such, no formal limit on the overall length of service of any of the Company’s Directors has been imposed, although the Board believes in the merits of an ongoing and progressive refreshment of its composition. Succession planning The Directors support a planned and progressive renewing of the Board. The Board’s tenure and succession policy seeks to ensure that the Board remains well balanced at all times through the application of a formal succession plan, seeking Corporate governance statement

64 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 to identify and appoint new Directors, as required, who possess a range of skills, knowledge and experience which is aligned to the activities of the Company. Directors must also be able to demonstrate sufficient commitment to the Company, including the ability to commit sufficient time to effectively discharge their duties. Overboarding The Board is cognisant of the concept of “overboarding” and has considered the time commitment required by the Directors’ other roles, taking into account their nature and complexity. The Board does not believe that any of the Directors are currently overboarded. The Board reviews this information annually to ensure all Directors have sufficient capacity to carry out their role effectively. Time Commitment of the Chairman The Board has specifically considered the time commitment of the Chairman, noting that he has various roles, including another chairmanship at a listed company. The Chairman has provided the Board with a detailed breakdown of his other time commitments and a description of the work he undertakes. The Board, noting that many of his other roles are at investment companies, has formed the opinion that his other directorships, in aggregate, are reasonable and do not negatively impact on his ability to discharge his duties to the Company. Moreover, the Board has noted that he commits a significant amount of the time to the Company and is dedicated to his role as Chairman of the Board. Further information on how the Board satisfies itself that Directors have sufficient time to effectively discharge their role is set out on pages 57 and 58. Board Diversity While the Board does not have a formal policy on diversity, it recognises the benefits at Board level and believes that Directors should have a mix of different skills, experience, backgrounds, ethnicity, gender and other characteristics. It has therefore agreed to comply with best practice and applicable regulation in respect of diversity, including gender and ethnicity. A broad range of factors are taken into account when setting an appointment brief and during the search and selection process and have been applied during the recruitment and that all Board appointments must be made on merit, in the context of the skills, experience, independence and knowledge which the Board as a whole requires to be effective. As at 30 November 2022 the Board had a 50:50 gender ratio, in accordance with relevant regulation and best practice, and will continue to consider other diversity characteristics, such as age, ethnicity, gender, disability, educational or professional background when appraising Board composition. The Board has complied with the recommendations of the Parker Review in respect of board diversity and the recent changes to the FCA’s Listing Rules which set new diversity targets and associated disclosure requirements for UK companies listed on the premium and standard segment of the London Stock Exchange. Listing Rule 9.8.6R (9) requires listed companies to include a statement in their annual reports and accounts in respect of certain targets on board diversity, or if those new targets have not been met to disclose the reasons for this. This new requirement applies to accounting periods commencing on or after 1 April 2022 and therefore the Company intends to report against these diversity targets for the year ending 30 November 2023. Further information on the composition and diversity of the Board can be found in the disclosure table which follows below: Gender Number of Board members Percentage of Board Number of senior roles held 1 Men 3 50 2 Women 3 50 1 Ethnicity 2 White British (or any other white background) 5 83.4 3 Asian or Asian British 1 16.6 0 1 A senior position is defined as the role of Chairman, Audit Committee Chairman or Senior Independent Director. 2 Categorisation of ethnicity is stated in accordance with the Office of National Statistics classification. Directors’ induction and training When a new Director is appointed to the Board, he or she is provided with all the relevant information regarding the Company and their duties and responsibilities as a Director. In addition, a new Director will also spend some time with representatives of the Manager, including the Investment Manager and the Company Secretary, whereby he or she will become familiar with the various processes which are considered necessary for the performance of their duties and responsibilities. The Company’s policy is to encourage Directors to keep up to date and attend training courses on matters which are directly relevant to their involvement with the Company. The Directors also receive regular briefings from, amongst others, the Auditor and the Company Secretary regarding any proposed developments or changes in law or regulations that could affect themselves or the Company. Directors’ liability insurance The Company has maintained appropriate Directors’ Liability Insurance cover throughout the year, which continues to be in force as at the date of this report. Corporate governance statement continued

Section 3: Governance 65 The Board’s responsibilities The Board is responsible to shareholders for the effective stewardship of the Company. A formal schedule of matters reserved for the decision of the Board has been adopted. Investment policy and strategy are determined by the Board. It is also responsible for the gearing policy, dividend policy, public documents, such as the Annual Report and Financial Statements, the buy-back policy and corporate governance matters. In order to enable them to discharge their responsibilities effectively the Board has full and timely access to relevant information. The Board currently meets at least six times a year to review investments, performance, financial reports and other reports of a strategic nature. Board or Board Committee meetings are also held on an ad hoc basis to consider issues as they arise. Key representatives of the Manager and/or Investment Manager attend each meeting and between these meetings there is regular contact with the Manager and Investment Manager. The Directors have direct access to company secretarial advice and the services of the Manager, through a nominated representative, who is responsible to the Board for ensuring that Board and Committee procedures are followed and that the Company complies with applicable rules and regulations. Where necessary, in the furtherance of their duties, the Directors may seek independent professional advice at the expense of the Company. Performance evaluation In order to review the effectiveness of the Board, its Committees and the individual Directors, the Board carries out an annual appraisal process. The annual evaluation for the year ended 30 November 2022 has been carried out with the assistance of an independent third party and took the form of electronic performance evaluation questionnaires. The evaluation looked at several key areas, including the performance of the Board and its Committees, the effectiveness of the Board’s oversight of the Investment Manager, investment strategy and performance, risk management, external relations and succession planning. The responses were then collated, analysed and discussions held between the Chairman and the Directors. The performance of the Chairman was reviewed by the other Directors led by Louise Nash, Senior Independent Director. The appraisal process is considered to be constructive in terms of identifying areas in which the functioning and performance of the Board and its Committees and the contribution of individual Directors could be improved, as well as building on and developing individual and collective strengths. There were no significant issues arising from the evaluation process and it was agreed that the Board and its Committees were functioning effectively. Delegation of responsibilities The Board has delegated the following areas of responsibility: Management and administration The management of the investment portfolio and the administration of the Company have been contractually delegated to BlackRock Fund Managers Limited (BFM or the Manager) as the Company’s AIFM, and BFM (with the permission of the Company) has delegated certain investment management and other ancillary services to BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited (BIM (UK) or the Investment Manager). The contractual arrangements with the Manager are summarised on pages 54 and 55. The Manager, operating under guidelines determined by the Board, has responsibility for the decisions relating to the day-to-day running of the Company and is accountable to the Board for the investment, financial and operating performance of the Company. The Manager has delegated the fund accounting and administration services to The Bank of New York Mellon (International) Limited. The review of the Manager’s performance is an ongoing duty and responsibility of the Board which is carried out at every Board Meeting. In addition, a formal review is undertaken annually, details of which are set out on page 65 of the Directors’ Report. The assets of the Company have been entrusted to the Depositary for safekeeping. The Company’s appointed Depositary is The Bank of New York Mellon (International) Limited. The address at which the business is conducted is given on page 124. The Board has delegated the exercise of voting rights attaching to the securities held in the portfolio to the Investment Manager. Details of the Investment Manager’s approach to voting is set out on page 56. Committees of the Board The Board has appointed a number of committees as set out below and on page 32. Copies of the terms of reference of each committee are available on request from the Company’s registered office, on the BlackRock website at blackrock.com/ uk/thrg and at each Annual General Meeting. Audit Committee The Audit Committee, is chaired by Loudon Greenlees and consists of all the Directors of the Company. Following his retirement from the Board at the conclusion of the AGM, Angela Lane will take on the role of chairman of the Company’s Audit Committee. Further details are provided in the Report of the Audit Committee on pages 75 to 78. Nomination Committee The Nomination Committee, which comprises all the Directors, is chaired by Christopher Samuel.

66 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 The role of the Committee is to review Board structure, size and composition, the balance of knowledge, experience and skills range and to consider succession planning and tenure policy. Appointments of new Directors will be made on a formalised basis, with the Committee agreeing the selection criteria and the method of selection, recruitment and appointment. Board diversity, including gender and ethnicity, will be taken into account in establishing the criteria. The services of an external search consultant may be used to identify potential candidates. The Committee meets at least once a year and more often if required. Management Engagement Committee The Management Engagement Committee is chaired by Christopher Samuel and comprises all the Directors of the Company. The Committee annually reviews the appropriateness of the Manager’s continued appointment, together with the terms and conditions thereof. In addition to reviewing performance, the Manager is also assessed in relation to the quality of the fund management and administration teams, commitment to their investment trust business, strength of relationships with shareholders and the appropriateness of the management contract, including fees. Remuneration Committee The Remuneration Committee was established with effect from 1 February 2021 and up to the financial year end, it was chaired by Angela Lane and comprises all the Directors of the Company. With effect from 1 December 2022, the Board resolved to appoint Nigel Burton as Chairman of the Company’s Remuneration Committee and Angela Lane stepped down from this role. Angela will take on the role of Chairman of the Audit Committee following the retirement of Loudon Greenlees at the conclusion of this year’s AGM. The Remuneration Committee has delegated responsibility for determining and recommending to the Board a policy for Directors’ remuneration. The Committee reports and makes recommendations to the Board on all matters of remuneration. Further details are provided in the Report of the Remuneration Committee on pages 69 to 72. Internal controls The Board is responsible for ensuring the establishment and maintenance of the Company’s system of internal controls and for monitoring their adequacy and effectiveness, for ensuring that financial information published or used within the business is reliable, and for regularly monitoring compliance with regulations governing the operation of investment companies. The Board reviews the effectiveness of the internal control systems on an ongoing basis to identify, evaluate and manage the Company’s significant risks. As part of that process, there are procedures designed to capture and evaluate any failings or weaknesses and should a matter be categorised by the Board as significant, procedures exist to ensure that necessary action is taken to remedy the failing. The Board is not aware of any significant failings or weaknesses arising during the year under review. Control of the risks identified, covering financial, operational, compliance and risk management, is embedded in the operations of the service providers as delegated by the Company. There is a monitoring and reporting process to review these controls, which has been in place throughout the year under review and up to the date of this report, carried out by the Manager’s internal audit department. This accords with the Financial Reporting Council’s: Guidance on Risk Management and Internal Control. The Company’s risk register sets out the risks relevant to the Company and describes, where relevant, the internal controls that are in place at the AIFM, the Investment Manager and other third party service providers to mitigate these risks. The Audit Committee formally reviews this register on a semi-annual basis and BFM, as the Company’s AIFM, reports on any significant issues that have been identified in the period. The Depositary also reviews the control processes in place at the Custodian, the Fund Accountant and the AIFM and reports formally to the Committee twice yearly. Both the AIFM and the Depositary will escalate issues and report to the Committee outside of these meetings on an ad hoc basis to the extent this is required. The Committee also receives summaries of the annual Service Organisation Control (SOC 1) reports respectively from BlackRock and The Bank of New York Mellon on the internal controls of their respective operations, together with the opinion of their reporting accountants. The Board recognises that these control systems can only be designed to manage rather than to eliminate the risk of failure to achieve business objectives, and to provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance against material misstatement or loss, and relies on the operating controls established by the Manager and the Depositary. The Manager prepares revenue forecasts and management accounts which allow the Board to assess the Company’s activities and review its performance at each Board meeting. The Board and the Manager have agreed clearly defined investment criteria and have specified levels of authority and exposure limits. Reports on these issues, including performance statistics and investment valuations, are submitted to the Board at each meeting. Internal audit The Company does not have its own internal audit function, as all the administration is delegated to the Manager whose internal audit department reports to the Company’s Audit Committee on a semi-annual basis on the results of testing performed in relation to the Manager’s internal control processes. The Board monitors the controls in place through the Manager’s internal audit department and considers that Corporate governance statement continued

Section 3: Governance 67 there is currently no need for the Company to have its own internal audit function although this matter is kept under review. Financial reporting The production of the Annual Report and Financial Statements is outsourced to the Fund Administrator and is reviewed and approved by the Directors. The Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities in respect of the Annual Report and Financial Statements is set out on page 79, the Independent Auditor’s Report on pages 82 to 87 and the Statement of Going Concern on page 57. Bribery prevention policy The provision of bribes of any nature to third parties in order to gain a commercial advantage is prohibited and is a criminal offence. The Company has a zero-tolerance policy towards bribery and a commitment to carry out business fairly, honestly and openly. The Board takes its responsibility to prevent bribery very seriously, and BlackRock has anti- bribery policies and procedures in place which are high level, proportionate and risk based, and which are periodically reviewed by the Board. The Company’s other service providers have been contacted in respect of their anti-bribery policies and where necessary, contractual changes are made to existing agreements in respect of anti-bribery provisions. Criminal Finances Act 2017 The Company has a commitment to zero-tolerance towards the criminal facilitation of tax evasion. GDPR Data protection rights were harmonised across the European Union following the implementation of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) on 25 May 2018. The Board has sought and received assurances from its third party service providers that they have taken appropriate steps to ensure compliance with GDPR. Communication with shareholders All shareholders have the opportunity to attend and vote at the AGM. The Notice of the AGM sets out the business of the Meeting and any special business is explained in the Directors’ Report. The Notice of the AGM and related papers are sent to shareholders at least 20 working days before the meeting. Separate resolutions are proposed for substantive issues. The Chairman also writes to shareholders each year to invite them to the AGM. In addition, in recognition of the importance of seeking to reach all shareholders, particularly those who purchase their shares via an intermediary, the Company has, as it did at this time last year, utilised the S.793 process with the objective of communicating with the Company’s broad shareholder base. The Board believes that it is important that as many shareholders as possible have the opportunity to attend the AGM and, importantly, that they are encouraged to exercise their votes. Regular updates on performance are available to shareholders on the website. The Investment Manager will review the Company’s activities at the AGM, where the Directors, including the Chairman of the Board and the Chairman of the Audit Committee and representatives of the Manager will be available to answer shareholders’ questions. Proxy voting figures are announced to the shareholders at the AGM and will be made available on the Manager’s website shortly after the meeting. In accordance with provision 4 of the 2018 UK Corporate Governance Code, when, in the opinion of the Board, a significant proportion of votes have been cast against a resolution at any general meeting, the Board will explain, when announcing the results of voting, what actions it intends to take to understand the reasons behind the vote result. The Company’s willingness to enter into discussions with shareholders is demonstrated by a programme of presentations made by the Investment Manager. The Board discusses with the Investment Manager at each Board meeting any feedback from meetings with shareholders, and it also receives reports from its corporate broker. The Chairman and Senior Independent Director also meet directly with shareholders providing a forum for canvassing their views and enabling the Board to be aware of any issues of concern. There is also a clear channel of communication between the Board and the Company’s shareholders via the Company Secretary and the Board encourages shareholders to utilise this. The Company Secretary has no express authority to respond to enquiries addressed to the Board and all communication, other than junk mail, is redirected to the Chairman. There is a section within this report entitled “Additional Information – Shareholder Information”, on pages 120 to 122, which provides an overview of useful information available to shareholders. The Company’s financial statements, regular fact sheets and other information, are also published on the BlackRock website at www.blackrock.com/uk/thrg. The work undertaken by the Auditor does not involve consideration of the maintenance and integrity of the website and, accordingly, the Auditor accepts no responsibility for any changes that have occurred to the financial statements since they were initially presented on the website. Visitors to the website need to be aware that legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of the financial statements may differ from legislation in their jurisdiction.

68 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 Packaged Retail and Insurance-Based Investment Products (PRIIPs) Regulation (the Regulation) The Regulation requires that anyone manufacturing, advising on, or selling a PRIIP to retail investors in the UK must comply with the Regulation. Shares issued by Investment Trusts fall into scope of the Regulation. Investors should be aware that the Regulation requires the AIFM, as the PRIIP manufacturer, to prepare a key information document (KID) in respect of the Company. This KID must be made available, free of charge, to UK retail investors prior to them making any investment decision and as published on BlackRock’s website. Neither the Board nor the Company is responsible for the information contained in the KID and investors should note that the procedures for calculating the risks, costs and potential returns are prescribed by law. The figures in the KID may not reflect the expected returns for the Company and anticipated performance returns cannot be guaranteed. The PRIIPs KID in respect of the Company can be found at: www.blackrock.com/uk/thrg. Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules Other information required to be disclosed pursuant to the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules has been placed in the Directors’ Report on pages 54 to 62 because it is information which refers to events that have taken place during the course of the year. By order of the Board CHRISTOPHER SAMUEL Chairman 9 February 2023 Corporate governance statement continued

Section 3: Governance 69 On behalf of the Board, the Remuneration Committee presents the Directors’ Remuneration Report for the year ended 30 November 2022 which has been prepared in accordance with Sections 420-422 of the Companies Act 2006 and the Large and Medium-sized Companies and Groups (Accounts and Reports) Regulations 2008. The law requires the Company’s Auditor to audit certain of the disclosures provided. Where disclosures have been audited, they are indicated as such. The Auditor’s opinion is included in their report on pages 82 to 87. Remuneration Committee The Committee has delegated responsibility for determining the policy for directors’ remuneration and setting remuneration for the Company’s chair, Audit Committee chair and independent Non-executive Director in accordance with the principles and provisions of the UK Code. The Committee reports and makes recommendations to the Board on all matters of remuneration. Statement by the Chairman of the Remuneration Committee A key driver of the Company’s Remuneration Policy is that fees payable to Directors should be sufficient to attract and retain individuals with suitable knowledge and experience. The Company’s Directors are all non-executive and are independent of the Manager. The Company’s Directors’ Remuneration Policy was last reviewed on 8 December 2022. Following this review, it was agreed that with effect from 1 December 2022 all Directors’ fees would be increased to the levels set out in the policy table on page 74. In setting the appropriate level of Directors’ fees, a number of factors have been considered; • the workload of the Directors, their responsibilities, any change in these responsibilities and additional legal duties (for example as a result of new legislation being implemented); • the size and complexity of the Company; • the time commitment required; • the level of skills and appropriate experience required and the need for Directors to maintain, on an ongoing basis, an appropriate level of knowledge of regulatory and compliance requirements in an industry environment of increasing complexity; • the average rate of inflation during the period since the last fee increase; and • the level of remuneration in comparison with other investment trusts in UK Smaller Companies sector to ensure that fees are in line with industry practice and with that of a Trust of similar size and complexity. Further detail on the Company’s remuneration policy and the basis for determining the level of any change in Directors’ remuneration are set out in the Remuneration policy on pages 73 and 74. Directors’ fees were last increased on 1 December 2021. No discretionary fees have been paid to Directors during the year or previous year or since inception and the payment of such fees is expected to be a rare occurrence, only necessary in exceptional circumstances. Any discretionary fees paid to the Directors will be clearly disclosed in the Directors’ Remuneration Report accompanied by an explanation of the work undertaken and why it was deemed necessary to pay such additional remuneration. The Company’s Directors are all non- executive and are independent of the Manager. No advice or services were provided by any external agencies or third parties. Implementation of the Remuneration Policy in the year 2022 The Directors intend that the Remuneration Policy, which forms part of this report, will be implemented as set out on pages 73 and 74. The Directors do not receive any performance related remuneration or incentives. Discretionary payments are permitted under the policy; however, such discretionary payments would only be considered in exceptional circumstances. Remuneration/service contracts The maximum remuneration of the Directors is determined within the limits of the Company’s Articles and the limit currently amounts in aggregate to £250,000. No element of the Directors’ remuneration is performance related. The Company has not awarded any share options or long term performance incentives to any of the Directors. None of the Directors has a service contract with the Company or receives any non-cash benefits or pension entitlements. The terms of their appointment are detailed in an appointment letter issued to them when they join the Board. These letters are available for inspection at the registered office of the Company. Report of the remuneration committee Angela Lane Chairman of the Remuneration Committee

70 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 Remuneration implementation report A single figure for the total remuneration of each Director is set out in the table below for the years ended 30 November 2022 and 2021. The information in the table below has been audited. Year ended 30 November 2022 Year ended 30 November 2021 Directors Base Salary Taxable Benefits 1 Total Base Salary Taxable Benefits 1 Total £ £ £ £ £ £ Christopher Samuel (Chairman) 44,000 775 44,775 41,000 – 41,000 Loudon Greenlees 35,000 275 35,275 32,500 – 32,500 Jean Matterson 2 – – – 8,745 – 8,745 Louise Nash 30,000 1,904 31,904 28,000 – 28,000 Angela Lane 30,000 654 30,654 28,000 – 28,000 Nigel Burton 30,000 300 30,300 26,389 – 26,389 Merryn Somerset Webb 3 30,000 1,703 31,703 19,255 – 19,255 Total 199,000 5,611 204,611 183,889 – 183,889 1 Taxable benefits relate to travel and subsistence costs. 2 Jean Matterson retired on 24 March 2021. 3 Merryn Somerset Webb was appointed as a Director with effect from 24 March 2021. No discretionary payments were made in the year to 30 November 2022 (2021: £nil). The amounts paid by the Company to the Directors were for services as Non-executive Directors. As at 30 November 2022, fees of £17,000 (2021: £15,000) were outstanding to Directors in respect of their annual fees. Relative importance of spend on pay As the Company has no employees, the table below also comprises the total remuneration costs and benefits paid by the Company. To enable shareholders to assess the relative importance of spend on pay, this has been shown in the table below compared to the Company’s net profit on ordinary activities after taxation, total operating expenditure and dividend distributions. 2022 £’000 2021 £’000 Change £’000 Directors’ total remuneration 205 184 21 Dividends paid and payable 11,249 1 10,674 575 Net (loss)/profit on ordinary activities after taxation (295,888) 223,334 (519,222) Buyback of ordinary shares after costs 16,550 nil 16,550 1 Based on 101,113,864 ordinary shares in issue on 7 February 2023. No payments were made in the period to any past Directors (2021: £nil). Report of the remuneration committee continued

Section 3: Governance 71 Annual percentage change in Directors’ remuneration The following table sets out the annual percentage changes in Directors’ fees over the past five years. Directors 30 November 2018 30 November 2019 30 November 2020 30 November 2021 30 November 2022 Christopher Samuel 1,2 27.5% 6.9% 2.6% 3.8% 7.3% Loudon Greenlees 3 5.0% 7.1% 3.3% 4.8% 7.7% Jean Matterson 4 0.0% 8.3% 3.8% 3.7% n/a Louise Nash 5 n/a n/a 3.8% 3.7% 7.1% Angela Lane 6 n/a n/a n/a 3.7% 7.1% Nigel Burton 7 n/a n/a n/a n/a 7.1% Merryn Somerset Webb 8 n/a n/a n/a n/a 7.1% 1 As Christopher Samuel was appointed as a Director on 1 June 2016, the percentage change in his annual fixed fee has been annualised. 2 Christopher Samuel was appointed as Chairman on 24 July 2017. 3 Loudon Greenlees was appointed as Audit Committee Chairman on 22 March 2017. 4 As Jean Matterson retired as a Director on 24 March 2021, the percentage change in her annual fixed fee has been annualised. 5 As Louise Nash was appointed as a Director on 21 March 2019, the percentage change in her annual fixed fee has been annualised. 6 As Angela Lane was appointed as a Director on 10 June 2020, the percentage change in her annual fixed fee has been annualised. 7 As Nigel Burton was appointed as Director on 21 December 2020, there is no percentage change comparison. 8 As Merryn Somerset Webb was appointed as a Director on 24 March 2021, there is no percentage change comparison. As previously noted, the Company does not have any employees and hence no comparisons are given in respect of the comparison between Directors’ and employees’ pay increases. Directors’ Shareholdings The interests of the Directors in the ordinary shares of the Company are set out in the table below. The Company does not have a share option scheme, therefore none of the Directors has an interest in any share options in the Company. There is no requirement for Directors to hold shares in the Company. 9 February 2023 30 November 2022 30 November 2021 Ordinary shares Ordinary shares Ordinary shares Christopher Samuel 64,294 64,294 63,352 Loudon Greenlees 15,000 15,000 15,000 Louise Nash 3,900 3,900 2,100 Angela Lane 11,614 11,614 11,496 Nigel Burton 16,238 16,238 16,000 Merryn Somerset Webb 1 3,727 3,727 3,727 Glen Suarez – n/a n/a The information in the table above has been audited. 1 Merryn Somerset Webb held 1,959 shares upon her appointment to the Board on 24 March 2021. All of the holdings of the Directors are beneficial. No changes to these holdings have been notified up to the date of this report.

72 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 Retirement of directors Further details are given in the Directors’ Report on pages 57 and 58. Performance The graph below compares the Company’s NAV and share price total returns with the total return on an equivalent investment in the Benchmark Index 1 . This index is deemed to be the most appropriate as the Company has a UK smaller and mid-capitalisation companies’ objective. Performance from 30 November 2012 to 30 November 2022 Share price performance NAV performance Benchmark Index 1 Nov 22 Nov 12 Nov 13 Nov 14 Nov 15 Nov 16 Nov 17 Nov 18 Nov 19 Nov 20 Nov 21 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 1 With effect from 22 March 2018, the Numis Smaller Companies plus AIM (excluding Investment Companies) Index replaced the Numis Smaller Companies excluding AIM (excluding Investment Companies) Index as the Company’s Benchmark Index. From 1 December 2013 to 21 March 2018, the Company’s Benchmark Index was the Numis Smaller Companies excluding AIM (excluding Investment Companies) Index. Prior to 1 December 2013 the Company’s Benchmark Index was the Numis Smaller Companies plus AIM (excluding Investment Companies) Index. The performance of the Benchmark Indices during these periods has been blended to reflect these changes. Sources: BlackRock and Datastream. Performance figures in Sterling terms with dividends reinvested, rebased to 100 at 30 November 2012. For and on behalf of the Board ANGELA LANE Chairman of the Remuneration Committee 9 February 2023 Report of the remuneration committee continued

Section 3: Governance 73 In setting the appropriate level of Directors’ fees, a number of factors are considered by the Company’s Remuneration Committee, including: • the workload of the Directors, their responsibilities, any change in these responsibilities and additional legal duties (for example as a result of new legislation being implemented); • the relationship with their suppliers (primarily the Company’s third party service providers); • the size and complexity of the Company; • the time commitment required; • the level of skills and appropriate experience required; • the need for Directors to maintain on an ongoing basis an appropriate level of knowledge of regulatory and compliance requirements in an industry environment of increasing complexity; • the average rate of inflation during the period since the last fee increase; • the level of remuneration in comparison with other investment trusts of a similar size and/or mandate; and • any data published by the Association of Investment Companies to ensure that fees are in line with industry practice. This comparison, together with consideration of any alteration in Non-executive Director responsibilities, is used to review whether any change in remuneration is necessary. The review is performed on an annual basis. The Remuneration Committee is cognisant of the need to avoid any potential conflicts of interest and has therefore agreed a mechanism by which no Director is present when his or her own pay is being considered. The Company has no employees and consequently no consideration is required to be given to employment conditions elsewhere in setting this policy and there has been no employee consultation. No element of the Directors’ remuneration is performance related or subject to recovery or withholding (except for tax). Directors cannot be awarded any share options or long- term performance incentives. None of the Directors has a service contract with the Company or receives any non-cash benefits (except as described in the policy table), pension entitlements or compensation for loss of office. The Remuneration Policy would be applied when agreeing the remuneration package of any new Director. The terms of Directors’ appointments are detailed in a letter sent to them when they join the Board. These letters are available for inspection at the registered office of the Company. Directors’ appointments do not have a fixed duration, but they can be terminated by the Company in writing at any time without obligation to pay compensation. On termination of the appointment, Directors shall only be entitled to accrued fees as at the date of termination together with reimbursement of any expenses properly incurred prior to that date. No payments for loss of office are made. Directors are also subject to re-election at least every three years and, if not elected, their appointment ceases immediately. However, in accordance with the UK Corporate Governance Code the Board have agreed that all Directors will, being eligible, stand for re-election annually. The continuation of an appointment is contingent on a satisfactory performance evaluation and re-election by shareholders at the AGM. Consideration of shareholders’ views In accordance with applicable law and regulation, an ordinary resolution to approve the remuneration report is put to shareholders at each AGM, and shareholders have the opportunity to express their views and raise any queries in respect of remuneration policy at this meeting. The Company last obtained shareholder approval for its remuneration policy at the AGM in 2020. In accordance with the Companies Act 2006, the remuneration policy will next be subject to a triennial binding shareholder vote at this year’s AGM. At the Company’s AGM held on 25 March 2020, 99.84% (including votes cast at the Chairman’s discretion) were in favour of the resolution to approve the remuneration policy and 0.16% of votes cast were against. The Company’s remuneration policy is laid before shareholders every three years. At the Company’s AGM held on 24 March 2022, 99.80% of votes cast were in favour of the resolution to approve the Directors’ remuneration report in respect of the year ended 30 November 2021 and 0.20% against. The remuneration report is laid before shareholders annually. Any discretionary fees paid to the Directors will be clearly disclosed in the Directors’ Remuneration Report accompanied by an explanation of the work undertaken. Directors’ remuneration policy

74 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 Policy table Purpose and link to strategy Fees payable to Directors should be sufficient to attract and retain individuals of high calibre with knowledge and experience which is suitably aligned to the activities of the Company. Those chairing the Board and key committees should be paid higher fees than other Directors in recognition of their more demanding roles. Fees should reflect the time spent by Directors on the Company’s affairs and the level of complexity of responsibilities borne by the Directors. Description Levels of fixed annual fee with effect from 1 December 2022: Chairman – £46,700 Audit Committee Chairman – £37,000 Directors – £31,700 All reasonable expenses to be reimbursed. Maximum levels Remuneration consists of a fixed fee each year, set in accordance with the stated policies and any increase granted must be in line with the stated policies. The Company’s Articles of Association provide that until otherwise determined by the Company by ordinary resolution, there shall be paid to the Directors (other than alternate Directors) such fees for their services in the office of Director as the Directors may determine (not exceeding in the aggregate an annual sum of £250,000 (subject to increase as provided above) or such larger amount as the Company may by ordinary resolution decide) divided between the Directors as they agree. In accordance with the provisions of the Company’s Articles of Association the Directors are also entitled to be repaid all reasonable travelling, hotel and other expenses incurred by them respectively in or about the performance of their duties as Directors including any expenses incurred in attending meetings of the Board or of Committees of the Board or Annual General Meetings or General Meetings. In addition, the Directors propose a limit of £10,000 in relation to the maximum that may be paid in respect of taxable benefits. These ceilings have been set at a level to provide flexibility in respect of the recruitment of additional Board members (where required) and inflation. Policy on share ownership Directors are encouraged to own shares in the Company. All Directors are currently shareholders, with the exception of Glen Suarez who was appointed after the financial year end. Operation Fixed fee element The Board reviews the quantum of Directors’ fees each year to ensure that this is in line with the level of Directors’ fees for other investment trusts of similar size and complexity. When considering any changes in fees, the Board will take into account factors such as the average rate of inflation over the period since the previous review, and the level and any change in the Directors’ responsibilities (including additional time commitments as a result of increased regulatory or corporate governance requirements). Directors are not eligible to be compensated for loss of office, nor are they eligible for bonuses, pension benefits, share options or other incentives or benefits. Directors do not have service contracts but are appointed under letters of appointment. Discretionary Payments The Company’s Articles of Association authorise the payment of discretionary fees to Directors for any additional work undertaken on behalf of the Company which is outside of their normal duties. Any such extra work undertaken is subject to the prior approval of the Chairman or, in the case of the Chairman undertaking the extra work, subject to the prior approval of the Chairman of the Audit Committee. The level of discretionary fees shall be determined by the Directors and will be subject to a maximum of £10,000 per annum per Director. Any discretionary fees paid will be disclosed in the Directors’ Remuneration Report within the Annual Report. Taxable benefits Certain expenses incurred by Directors are required to be treated as taxable benefits. Taxable benefits comprise, but are not limited to, travel expenses and subsistence incurred by the Directors in the course of travel to attend Board and Committee meetings which are held at the Company’s registered office in London, and which are reimbursed by the Company and therefore treated as a benefit in kind and are subject to tax and national insurance. The Company’s policy in respect of this element of remuneration is that all reasonable costs of this nature will be reimbursed as they are incurred, including tax and national insurance costs incurred by the Directors on such expenses. Directors’ remuneration policy continued

Section 3: Governance 75 As Chairman of the Audit Committee (the Committee) I am pleased to present the Committee’s report to shareholders for the year ended 30 November 2022. Composition The Committee consists of all the Directors of the Company, including the Board Chairman since 2019. Following the publication of the latest AIC Code of Corporate Governance, which permits the Board Chairman to be a member of the Committee, the Board determined that it was appropriate for him to become a member of the Committee, particularly given that he is a Chartered Accountant and has recent and relevant financial experience. The Board considers that at least four members of the Committee have recent and relevant financial experience and specific competence in accounting and/or auditing and the Committee, as a whole, has competence relevant to the sector in which the Company operates to discharge its function effectively. Further information on the experience of the members of the Committee can also be found in their biographies on pages 33 to 36. Role and responsibilities The Company has established a separately chaired Committee whose duties include considering and recommending to the Board for approval the contents of the half yearly and annual financial statements and providing an opinion as to whether the Annual Report and Financial Statements, taken as a whole, are fair, balanced and understandable and provide the information necessary for shareholders to assess the Company’s performance, position, business model and strategy. The Committee reviews the external Auditor’s report thereon and has primary responsibility for the relationship with the external Auditor, including the development of a policy on the provision of non-audit services, reviewing and forming an opinion on the effectiveness of the external audit process and audit quality. Other duties include reviewing the appropriateness of the Company’s accounting policies and monitoring the effectiveness of the internal control systems and standards. The Company operates within written terms of reference detailing its scope and duties and these are available on the Company’s website at blackrock.com/uk/thrg. The Committee meets at least three times a year. Two of these meetings are held prior to the Board meetings to approve the half yearly and annual reports. The Committee will hold additional meetings where deemed to be necessary. The Committee also receives regular reports from the Manager’s internal audit and compliance departments. Responsibilities and review of the external audit During the year the principal activities of the Audit Committee included: • considering and recommending to the Board for approval the contents of the half yearly and annual financial statements and reviewing the external auditors’ report thereon; • reviewing the scope, execution, results, cost effectiveness, independence and objectivity of the external Auditor; • reviewing the audit and any non-audit fees payable to the external Auditor and the terms of its engagement; • reviewing and approving the external Auditor’s plan for the financial year, with a focus on the identification of areas of audit risk, and consideration of the appropriateness of the level of audit materiality adopted; • reviewing the effectiveness of the external audit process and the quality of the audit engagement leader and the audit team, and making a recommendation to the Board with respect to the reappointment of the Auditor; • reviewing the role of the Manager and third party service providers in an effective audit process; • considering the quality of the formal audit report to shareholders; • reviewing the appropriateness of the Company’s accounting policies; • monitoring the effectiveness of the Company’s risk management and internal control systems and standards and carrying out a review, at least annually, of their effectiveness; and • evaluating the need for an internal audit function, as set out in the Corporate Governance Statement on pages 66 and 67. The fees paid to the external Auditor are set out in note 5 on page 97. An explanation on how auditor objectivity and independence is safeguarded is reported under assessment of the effectiveness of the external audit process on pages 77 and 78. Whistleblowing policy The Committee has also reviewed and accepted the ‘whistleblowing’ policy that has been put in place by the Manager under which its staff, in confidence, can raise concerns about possible improprieties in matters of financial reporting or other matters, in so far as they affect the Company. Loudon Greenlees Chairman of the Audit Committee Report of the Audit Committee

76 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 Significant issues considered regarding the Annual Report and Financial Statements During the year, the Committee considered a number of significant issues and areas of key audit risk in respect of the Annual Report and Financial Statements. The Committee reviewed the external audit plan at an early stage and concluded that the appropriate areas of audit risk relevant to the Company had been identified and that suitable audit procedures had been put in place to obtain reasonable assurance that the Financial Statements as a whole would be free of material misstatements. The table below sets out the key areas of risk identified by the Committee and also explains how these were addressed. Significant issue How the issue was addressed The accuracy of the valuation of the investment portfolio Listed investments, long and short derivative positions and index futures are valued using stock exchange prices from third party vendors. The Board reviews detailed portfolio valuations on a regular basis throughout the year and receives confirmation from the Manager that the pricing basis is appropriate, in line with relevant accounting standards as adopted by the Company and that the carrying values are materially correct. The risk of misappropriation of assets and ownership of investments The Depositary is responsible for financial restitution for loss of financial investments held in custody. The Depositary reports to the Committee on a twice-yearly basis and is also available to attend the Company’s Annual General Meeting. The Committee reviews reports from its service providers on key controls over assets of the Company. Any significant issues are reported by the Manager to the Committee. The Manager has put in place procedures to ensure that investments can only be made to the extent that the appropriate contractual and legal arrangements are in place to protect the Company’s assets. The accuracy of the calculation of management and performance fees The Manager reports to the Committee on the calculation of any performance fee accruals that have been included in the Company’s NAV on a regular basis. The management fee and any performance fee are calculated in accordance with the contractual terms in the investment management agreement by the administrator, BNYM, and are reviewed in detail by the Manager and are also subject to an analytical review by the Committee. The risk that income is overstated, incomplete or inaccurate through failure to recognise proper income entitlements or to apply the appropriate accounting treatment for recognition of income The Committee reviews income forecasts, including special dividends, and receives explanations from the Manager for any variations or significant movements from previous forecasts and prior year figures. The audit includes checks on the completeness and accuracy of income, and also checks that this has been recognised in accordance with stated accounting policies. The provision of portfolio valuation, fund accounting and administration services is delegated to the Manager, which sub-delegates the provision of fund accounting to The Bank of New York Mellon (International) Limited. The provision of custody and depositary services is directly contracted by the Company to The Bank of New York Mellon (International) Limited. The Committee has therefore reviewed summaries of the Service Organisation Control (SOC 1) reports prepared by the Manager, Depositary and the Fund Accountants to ensure that the relevant control procedures are in place to cover these areas of risk as identified in the table above and are adequate and appropriate and have been designated as operating effectively by the reporting auditors. The Committee receives and reviews regular reports on the material risks faced by the Company and the key controls employed to manage these risks. Consideration is given regularly to the nature and extent of risks faced by the Company and these risks are monitored and regularly re- assessed. Where changes in risk have been identified during the year, the Committee will assess whether any further action is required to mitigate these risks. The Committee has reviewed the effectiveness of the Company’s risk management and internal controls systems, which accord with the FRC ‘Guidance on Risk Management, Internal Control and Related Financial and Business Reporting’, and has procedures in place to review their effectiveness on a regular basis. No material weaknesses have been identified in the year under review and up to the date of this report. The Committee confirms that these procedures have been in place throughout the Company’s financial year and continue to be in place up to the date of approval of this report. Report of the Audit Committee continued

Section 3: Governance 77 Auditor and audit tenure The Company’s current auditor PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP was appointed on 21 March 2019 following the result of a tender process held in late 2018. The current audit engagement leader is Mr Allan McGrath who has been the Company’s audit engagement leader since September 2021. Prior to this date, the audit engagement leader was Christopher Meyrick. The Committee, in conjunction with the Board, is committed to reviewing this appointment on a regular basis to ensure the Company is receiving an optimal level of service. The appointment of the Auditor is reviewed each year and the audit engagement leader rotates at least every five years. There are no contractual obligations that restrict the Company’s choice of auditor. The Committee is mindful of the EU Audit Reform (as retained in UK law), including regulations on mandatory auditor regulation which require a review of the appointment of the auditor every ten years. The legislation also prohibits certain non-audit consulting services and caps the amount of additional fees auditors can charge their clients. The Company carried out a formal tender process in 2018 and following due consideration, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP was selected as the Company’s new Independent Auditor. It is the Company’s policy to put the statutory audit out to tender at least every ten years. The Committee is satisfied that the Company has complied with the provisions of the Statutory Audit Services for Large Companies Market Investigation (Mandatory Use of Competitive Processes and Audit Committee Responsibilities) Order 2014, published by the Competition and Markets Authority on 26 September 2014. In recognition of underlying audit rotation requirements, the Committee currently intends that a further tender process will be undertaken during the year to 30 November 2029 to cover the financial year ending 30 November 2029 onwards. The Committee will continue to review the Auditor’s appointment each year to ensure that the Company is receiving an optimal level of service. There were no fees paid to the Auditor in respect of non-audit services during the year. The Company’s policy on non-audit services is set out in full in the Audit Committee’s terms of reference which are available on the Company’s website at blackrock.com/uk/thrg. Assessment of the effectiveness of the external audit process To assess the effectiveness of the external audit, members of the Committee communicate regularly with BIM (UK) and BFM to obtain a good understanding of the quality and efficiency of the audit. The Committee has adopted a formal framework in its review of the effectiveness of the external audit process and audit quality. This includes a review of the following areas: • the quality of the audit engagement leader and the audit team; • the expertise of the audit firm and the resources available to it; • identification of areas of audit risk; • planning, scope and execution of the audit; • consideration of the appropriateness of the level of audit materiality adopted; • the role of the Committee, the Manager and third party service providers in an effective audit process; • communication by the Auditor with the Committee; • monitoring and reviewing the supply of any non-audit services, taking into account relevant ethical guidelines regarding the provision of such services; • how the Auditor supports the work of the Committee and how the audit contributes added value; • a review of the independence and objectivity of the audit firm; and • the quality of the formal audit report to shareholders. Feedback in relation to the audit process and the effectiveness of the Manager in performing its role is also sought from relevant involved parties, notably the audit engagement leader and his team. The external Auditor is invited to attend the Committee meetings at which the half yearly and annual report and financial statements are considered and to meet with the Audit Committee without representatives of the Manager being present on at least one occasion. The effectiveness of the Board and the Manager in the external audit process is assessed principally in relation to the timely identification and resolution of any process errors or control breaches that might impact the Company’s net asset values and accounting records. It is also assessed by reference to how successfully any issues in respect of areas of accounting judgement are identified and resolved, the quality and timeliness of papers analysing these judgements, the Board’s and the Manager’s approach to the value of independent audit and the booking of any audit adjustments arising, and the timely provision of draft public documents for review by the auditor and the Committee. To form a conclusion with regard to the independence of the external Auditor, the Committee considers whether the skills and experience of the Auditor makes it a suitable supplier of non-audit services and whether there are safeguards in place to ensure that there is no threat to its objectivity and

78 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 independence in the conduct of the audit resulting from the provision of any such services. On a continuous basis, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP reviews the independence of its relationship with the Company and, on a semi-annual basis, reports to the Committee, providing details of any other relationship with the Manager. As part of this review, the Committee also receives information about policies and processes for maintaining independence and monitoring compliance with relevant requirements from the Company’s Auditor, including information on the rotation of the Audit engagement leader and staff, the level of fees that the Company pays in proportion to the overall fee income of the firm, and the level of related fees, details of any relationships between the Audit firm and its staff and the Company as well as an overall confirmation from the Auditor of its independence and objectivity. As a result of its review, the Committee has concluded that PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is independent of the Company and the Manager. Conclusions in respect of the Annual Report and Financial Statements The production and the audit of the Company’s Annual Report and Financial Statements is a comprehensive process requiring input from a number of different contributors. In order to reach a conclusion that the Annual Report and Financial Statements are fair, balanced and understandable, the Board has requested that the Committee advise on whether these criteria are satisfied. In so doing, the Committee has given consideration to the following: • the comprehensive control framework over the production of the Annual Report and Financial Statements, including the verification processes in place to deal with the factual content; • the extensive levels of review that are undertaken in the production process by the Manager, the Depositary and the Committee; • the controls that are in place at the Manager and other third party service providers to ensure the completeness and accuracy of the Company’s financial records and the security of the Company’s assets; and • the existence of satisfactory Service Organisation Control reports that have been reviewed and reported on by external auditors to verify the effectiveness of the internal controls of the Manager, Custodian and Fund Accountant. In addition to the work outlined above, the Committee has reviewed the Annual Report and Financial Statements and is satisfied that, taken as a whole, they are fair, balanced and understandable and provide shareholders with the information necessary to assess the Company’s position, performance, business model and strategy. In reaching this conclusion, the Committee has assumed that the reader of the Annual Report and Financial Statements would have a reasonable level of knowledge of the investment trust industry in general. The Committee has reported on these findings to the Board who affirms the Committee’s conclusions in the Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities in respect of the Annual Report and Financial Statements on page 79. As mentioned in this year’s Chairman’s Statement, having served on the Board for 9 years I will step down as a Director and as chairman of the Company’s Audit Committee at the conclusion of this year’s AGM. I will be succeeded in this role by Angela Lane. Angela is a chartered accountant and a highly experienced Non-executive Director and Audit Committee Chair with many years’ experience. I am confident that I leave the Audit Committee in safe hands and that she will lead with great diligence, prudence and integrity. I wish her well in her new role. LOUDON GREENLEES Chairman of the Audit Committee 9 February 2023 Report of the Audit Committee continued

Section 3: Governance 79 The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report and Financial Statements, (including the Directors’ Remuneration Report) in accordance with applicable United Kingdom law and regulations. Company law requires the Directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year. Under that law, the Directors are required to prepare the financial statements in accordance with international accounting standards in conformity with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006. Under company law the Directors must not approve the financial statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Company and of the profit or loss of the Company for that period. In preparing these Financial Statements, the Directors are required to: • present fairly the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company; • select suitable accounting policies in accordance with IAS 8, ‘Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors’ and then apply them consistently; • present information, including accounting policies, in a manner that provides relevant, reliable, comparable and understandable information; • make judgements and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; • state whether the Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with international accounting standards in conformity with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006, subject to any material departures disclosed and explained in the Financial Statements; • provide additional disclosures when compliance with the specific requirements in international accounting standards in conformity with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006, is insufficient to enable users to understand the impact of particular transactions, other events and conditions on the Company’s financial position and financial performance; and • prepare the Financial Statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Company will continue in business. The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the Company’s transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Company and enable them to ensure that the Financial Statements comply with the Companies Act 2006. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities. The Directors are also responsible for preparing the Strategic Report, the Directors’ Report, the Directors’ Remuneration Report and the Corporate Governance Statement in accordance with the Companies Act 2006 and applicable regulations, including the requirements of the Listing Rules and the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules. The Directors have delegated responsibility to the Investment Manager and the AIFM for the maintenance and integrity of the Company’s corporate and financial information included on BlackRock’s website. Legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of Financial Statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions. Each of the Directors, whose names are listed on pages 33 to 36, confirms to the best of his or her knowledge that: • the Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with international accounting standards in conformity with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and net loss of the Company; and • the Annual Report and Financial Statements include a fair review of the development and performance of the business and the position of the Company, together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties that it faces. The 2018 UK Corporate Governance Code also requires Directors to ensure that the Annual Report and Financial Statements are fair, balanced and understandable. In order to reach a conclusion on this matter, the Board has requested that the Audit Committee advise on whether it considers that the Annual Report and Financial Statements fulfil these requirements. The process by which the Committee has reached these conclusions is set out in the Audit Committee’s report on pages 75 to 78. As a result, the Board has concluded that the Annual Report and Financial Statements for the year ended 30 November 2022, taken as a whole, are fair, balanced and understandable and provided the information necessary for shareholders to assess the Company’s position, performance, business model and strategy. For and on behalf of the Board CHRISTOPHER SAMUEL Chairman 9 February 2023 Statement of Directors’ responsibilities in respect of the Annual Report and Financial Statements

Financial Statements Section 4: Financial 81 Global travel and UK high street retailer WHSmith reported strong trading on a rebound in travel volumes, notably in the USA. District Market stores, including the one shown here in San Francisco airport, represent one of several brands within its portfolio of 600 international outlets. PHOTO COURTESY OF WHSMITH

82 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 Report on the audit of the financial statements Opinion In our opinion, BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc’s financial statements: • give a true and fair view of the state of the Company’s affairs as at 30 November 2022 and of its loss and cash flows for the year then ended; • have been properly prepared in accordance with UK- adopted international accounting standards; and • have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006. We have audited the financial statements, included within the Annual Report and Financial Statements (the “Annual Report”), which comprise: the Statement of Financial Position as at 30 November 2022; the Statement of Comprehensive Income, the Statement of Changes in Equity, and the Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended; and the notes to the financial statements, which include a description of the significant accounting policies. Our opinion is consistent with our reporting to the Audit Committee. Basis for opinion We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (“ISAs (UK)”) and applicable law. Our responsibilities under ISAs (UK) are further described in the Auditors’ responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements section of our report. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. Independence We remained independent of the Company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in the UK, which includes the FRC’s Ethical Standard, as applicable to listed public interest entities, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. To the best of our knowledge and belief, we declare that non- audit services prohibited by the FRC’s Ethical Standard were not provided. We have provided no non-audit services to the Company in the period under audit. Our audit approach Overview Audit scope • The Company is a standalone Investment Trust Company and engages BlackRock Fund Managers Limited (the ‘Manager’) to manage its assets. The Manager engages Bank of New York Mellon (International) Limited (the “Fund Accountant”) to provide administrative functions to the Company. • We tailored the scope of our audit taking into account the type of investments within the Company, the involvement of the third parties, the accounting processes, controls, and the industry in which the Company operates. Key audit matters • Valuation and existence of investments • Accuracy, occurrence and completeness of investment income Materiality • Overall materiality: £6,333,544 (2021: £9,351,480) based on 1% of net assets. • Performance materiality: £4,750,158 (2021: £7,013,610). The scope of our audit As part of designing our audit, we determined materiality and assessed the risks of material misstatement in the financial statements. Key audit matters Key audit matters are those matters that, in the auditors’ professional judgement, were of most significance in the audit of the financial statements of the current period and include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) identified by the auditors, including those which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy; the allocation of resources in the audit; and directing the efforts of the engagement team. These matters, and any comments we make on the results of our procedures thereon, were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters. This is not a complete list of all risks identified by our audit. The key audit matters below are consistent with last year. Independent Auditor’s Report to the members of BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc

Section 4: Financial Statements 83 Key audit matter How our audit addressed the key audit matter Valuation and existence of investments Refer to the Report of the Audit Committee (page 75), Accounting policies (page 92) and Notes to the financial statements (page 92). The investment portfolio at the year end comprised of listed equity investments valued at £577 million and a net holding of derivative Contracts for Difference (CFDs) with a net fair value of £2.6m. We focused on the valuation and existence of investments because investments represent the principal element of the net asset value (NAV) as disclosed on the Statement of Financial Position in the Financial Statements. Our audit work on the valuation and existence of the investments included the following: • We tested the valuation of all investments and CFDs by agreeing the valuation to independent third party sources using our proprietary data analytics tool “Halo”. Where further investigation was required into HALO pricing, for example where no price was returned by HALO, we manually agreed pricing to independent third party sources. • We tested the existence of all of the investments and CFDs by agreeing the Company’s holdings to an independent custodian confirmation in the case of the listed equity investments, as well as independent broker confirmations for the portfolio of derivatives, as at 30 November 2022. We have no matters to report as a result of this testing. Accuracy, occurrence and completeness of investment income Income from investments consists primarily of dividend income. Within dividend income there is a risk of incomplete or inaccurate recognition of revenue through the failure to recognise proper income entitlements or to apply an inappropriate accounting treatment. In addition, the Directors are required to exercise judgement in determining whether income receivable in the form of special dividends should be classified as ‘revenue’ or ‘capital’ in the Statement of Comprehensive Income. We responded to this risk by performing the following audit procedures: • We obtained an understanding of the processes and controls around income recognition and classification of special dividends by reviewing the internal control reports of the Fund Accountant. • We assessed the appropriateness of the classification of special dividends as revenue or capital by the Directors with reference to publicly available information. • For all dividends recorded by the Company, we performed our audit procedures through the use of our proprietary testing tool Halo. Halo tested the accuracy of their receipts by agreeing the dividend rates from investments to independent market data. Halo tested occurrence by examining for each investment holding, that all dividends recorded in the year had been declared in the market. To test for completeness, Halo investigated that the appropriate dividends had been received in the year by reference to independent data of dividends declared for all investment holdings held within the year. Testing the accuracy, occurrence, and completeness of net profit from derivatives by agreeing a sample of derivative returns against broker statements; For the revenue generated by realised gains, we test the accuracy and occurrence by agreeing a sample of gains recorded to supporting evidence such as bank statements and broker statements. • As stipulated by the requirements set out in the AIC SORP, we tested the allocation and presentation of dividend income between the revenue and capital return columns of the Statement of comprehensive income by determining reasons behind dividend distributions. We have no matters to report as a result of this testing.

84 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 How we tailored the audit scope We tailored the scope of our audit to ensure that we performed enough work to be able to give an opinion on the financial statements as a whole, taking into account the structure of the Company, the accounting processes and controls, and the industry in which it operates. All audit procedures were conducted remotely by a UK audit team. We tested and examined information using sampling and other auditing techniques, to the extent we considered necessary to provide a reasonable basis for us to form our own judgements. The impact of climate risk on our audit In planning our audit, we made enquiries of the Directors and the Investment Manager to understand the extent of the potential impact of climate change risk on the Company’s financial statements. The Directors and Investment Manager concluded that the impact on the measurement and disclosures within the financial statements is not material because the majority of the Company’s investment portfolio is made up of level 1 quoted securities which are valued at fair value based on market prices. We found this to be consistent with our understanding of the Company’s investment activities. We also considered the consistency of the climate change disclosures included in the Strategic Report and Investment Manager Report with the financial statements and our knowledge from our audit. Materiality The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. We set certain quantitative thresholds for materiality. These, together with qualitative considerations, helped us to determine the scope of our audit and the nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures on the individual financial statement line items and disclosures and in evaluating the effect of misstatements, both individually and in aggregate on the financial statements as a whole. Based on our professional judgement, we determined materiality for the financial statements as a whole as follows: Overall company materiality £6,333,544 (2021: £9,351,480). How we determined it 1% of net assets Rationale for benchmark applied We applied this benchmark, which is a generally accepted auditing practice for investment trust audits. We use performance materiality to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected misstatements exceeds overall materiality. Specifically, we use performance materiality in determining the scope of our audit and the nature and extent of our testing of account balances, classes of transactions and disclosures, for example in determining sample sizes. Our performance materiality was 75% (2021: 75%) of overall materiality, amounting to £4,750,158 (2021: £7,013,610) for the Company financial statements. In determining the performance materiality, we considered a number of factors - the history of misstatements, risk assessment and aggregation risk and the effectiveness of controls - and concluded that an amount at the upper end of our normal range was appropriate. We agreed with the Audit Committee that we would report to them misstatements identified during our audit above £317,000 (2021: £468,000) as well as misstatements below that amount that, in our view, warranted reporting for qualitative reasons. Conclusions relating to going concern Our evaluation of the Directors’ assessment of the Company’s ability to continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting included: • evaluating the Directors’ updated risk assessment and considering whether it addressed relevant threats, including Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, rise of inflation and the wider macroeconomic uncertainty; • evaluating the Directors’ assessment of potential operational impacts, considering their consistency with other available information and our understanding of the business and assessed the potential impact on the financial statements; • reviewing the Directors’ assessment of the Company’s financial position in the context of its ability to meet future expected operating expenses, their assessment of liquidity as well as their review of the operational resilience of the Company and oversight of key third-party service providers; and • assessing the implication of significant reductions in NAV as a result of a severe but plausible downside in the market’s performance on the ongoing ability of the Company to operate. Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for a period of at least twelve months from when the financial statements are authorised for issue. In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the Directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements is appropriate. Independent Auditor’s Report continued

Section 4: Financial Statements 85 However, because not all future events or conditions can be predicted, this conclusion is not a guarantee as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. In relation to the Directors’ reporting on how they have applied the UK Corporate Governance Code, we have nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation to the Directors’ statement in the financial statements about whether the Directors considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of accounting. Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the Directors with respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections of this report. Reporting on other information The other information comprises all of the information in the Annual Report other than the financial statements and our auditors’ report thereon. The Directors are responsible for the other information. Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and, accordingly, we do not express an audit opinion or, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in this report, any form of assurance thereon. In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify an apparent material inconsistency or material misstatement, we are required to perform procedures to conclude whether there is a material misstatement of the financial statements or a material misstatement of the other information. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report based on these responsibilities. With respect to the Strategic Report and Directors’ Report, we also considered whether the disclosures required by the UK Companies Act 2006 have been included. Based on our work undertaken in the course of the audit, the Companies Act 2006 requires us also to report certain opinions and matters as described below. Strategic Report and Directors’ Report In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of the audit, the information given in the Strategic Report and Directors’ Report for the year ended 30 November 2022 is consistent with the financial statements and has been prepared in accordance with applicable legal requirements. In light of the knowledge and understanding of the Company and its environment obtained in the course of the audit, we did not identify any material misstatements in the Strategic Report and Directors’ Report. Directors’ remuneration In our opinion, the part of the report of the remuneration committee to be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 2006. Corporate governance statement The Listing Rules require us to review the Directors’ statements in relation to going concern, longer-term viability and that part of the corporate governance statement relating to the Company’s compliance with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code specified for our review. Our additional responsibilities with respect to the corporate governance statement as other information are described in the reporting on other information section of this report. Based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded that each of the following elements of the corporate governance statement is materially consistent with the financial statements and our knowledge obtained during the audit, and we have nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation to: • The Directors’ confirmation that they have carried out a robust assessment of the emerging and principal risks; • The disclosures in the Annual Report that describe those principal risks, what procedures are in place to identify emerging risks and an explanation of how these are being managed or mitigated; • The Directors’ statement in the financial statements about whether they considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of accounting in preparing them, and their identification of any material uncertainties to the Company’s ability to continue to do so over a period of at least twelve months from the date of approval of the financial statements; • The Directors’ explanation as to their assessment of the Company’s prospects, the period this assessment covers and why the period is appropriate; and • The Directors’ statement as to whether they have a reasonable expectation that the Company will be able to continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over the period of its assessment, including any related disclosures drawing attention to any necessary qualifications or assumptions. Our review of the Directors’ statement regarding the longer- term viability of the Company was substantially less in scope than an audit and only consisted of making inquiries and considering the Directors’ process supporting their statement; checking that the statement is in alignment with the relevant provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code; and considering whether the statement is consistent with the financial statements and our knowledge and understanding of the Company and its environment obtained in the course of the audit.

86 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 In addition, based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded that each of the following elements of the corporate governance statement is materially consistent with the financial statements and our knowledge obtained during the audit: • The Directors’ statement that they consider the Annual Report, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable, and provides the information necessary for the members to assess the Company’s position, performance, business model and strategy; • The section of the Annual Report that describes the review of effectiveness of risk management and internal control systems; and • The section of the Annual Report describing the work of the Audit Committee. We have nothing to report in respect of our responsibility to report when the Directors’ statement relating to the Company’s compliance with the Code does not properly disclose a departure from a relevant provision of the Code specified under the Listing Rules for review by the auditors. Responsibilities for the financial statements and the audit Responsibilities of the Directors for the financial statements As explained more fully in the Statement of Directors’ responsibilities in respect of the Annual Report and Financial Statements, the Directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements in accordance with the applicable framework and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view. The Directors are also responsible for such internal control as they determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. In preparing the financial statements, the Directors are responsible for assessing the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the Directors either intend to liquidate the Company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so. Auditors’ responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditors’ report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements. Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non- compliance with laws and regulations. We design procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect material misstatements in respect of irregularities, including fraud. The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud, is detailed below. Based on our understanding of the Company and industry, we identified that the principal risks of non-compliance with laws and regulations related to breaches of Section 1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010 (see page 40 of the Annual Report), and we considered the extent to which non- compliance might have a material effect on the financial statements. We also considered those laws and regulations that have a direct impact on the financial statements such as the Companies Act 2006. We evaluated management’s incentives and opportunities for fraudulent manipulation of the financial statements (including the risk of override of controls), and determined that the principal risks were related to posting inappropriate journal entries to increase net asset value. Audit procedures performed by the engagement team included: • discussions with the Manager and the Audit Committee, including consideration of known or suspected instances of non-compliance with laws and regulation and fraud; • understand the controls implemented by the Company and the Fund Accountant designed to prevent and detect irregularities; • assessment of the Company’s compliance with the requirements of Section 1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010, including recalculation of numerical aspects of the eligibility conditions; • identifying and testing journal entries, in particular year end journal entries posted by the Fund Accountant during the preparation of the financial statements; • designing audit procedures to incorporate unpredictability around the nature, timing or extent of our testing for example, targeting transactions that otherwise would be immaterial; and • reviewing relevant meeting minutes, including those of the Audit Committee. There are inherent limitations in the audit procedures described above. We are less likely to become aware of instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations that are not closely related to events and transactions reflected in the financial statements. Also, the risk of not detecting a material misstatement due to fraud is higher than the risk of not detecting one resulting from error, as fraud may involve deliberate concealment by, for example, forgery or intentional misrepresentations, or through collusion. Independent Auditor’s Report continued

Section 4: Financial Statements 87 Our audit testing might include testing complete populations of certain transactions and balances, possibly using data auditing techniques. However, it typically involves selecting a limited number of items for testing, rather than testing complete populations. We will often seek to target particular items for testing based on their size or risk characteristics. In other cases, we will use audit sampling to enable us to draw a conclusion about the population from which the sample is selected. A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements is located on the FRC’s website at: www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our auditors’ report. Use of this report This report, including the opinions, has been prepared for and only for the Company’s members as a body in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006 and for no other purpose. We do not, in giving these opinions, accept or assume responsibility for any other purpose or to any other person to whom this report is shown or into whose hands it may come save where expressly agreed by our prior consent in writing. Other required reporting Companies Act 2006 exception reporting Under the Companies Act 2006 we are required to report to you if, in our opinion: • we have not obtained all the information and explanations we require for our audit; or • adequate accounting records have not been kept by the Company, or returns adequate for our audit have not been received from branches not visited by us; or • certain disclosures of Directors’ remuneration specified by law are not made; or • the financial statements and the part of the Report of the remuneration committee to be audited are not in agreement with the accounting records and returns. We have no exceptions to report arising from this responsibility. Appointment Following the recommendation of the Audit Committee, we were appointed by the Directors on 21 March 2019 to audit the financial statements for the year ended 30 November 2019 and subsequent financial periods. The period of total uninterrupted engagement is 4 years, covering the years ended 30 November 2019 to 30 November 2022. Allan McGrath (Senior Statutory Auditor) for and on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Chartered Accountants and Statutory Auditors Edinburgh 9 February 2023

88 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 Statement of Comprehensive Income for the year ended 30 November 2022 2022 2021 Notes Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 Income from investments held at fair value through profit or loss 3 12,585 91 12,676 12,188 – 12,188 Net income from derivatives 3, 11 1,526 – 1,526 1,272 – 1,272 Other income 3 749 – 749 7 – 7 Total income 14,860 91 14,951 13,467 – 13,467 Net (loss)/profit on investments held at fair value through profit or loss 10 – (250,583) (250,583) – 192,102 192,102 Net (loss)/profit on foreign exchange – (676) (676) – 141 141 Net (loss)/profit from derivatives 11 – (55,673) (55,673) – 29,070 29,070 Total 14,860 (306,841) (291,981) 13,467 221,313 234,780 Expenses Investment management and performance fees 4 (756) (2,269) (3,025) (913) (9,394) (10,307) Other operating expenses 5 (843) (20) (863) (1,078) (27) (1,105) Total operating expenses (1,599) (2,289) (3,888) (1,991) (9,421) (11,412) Net profit/(loss) on ordinary activities before finance costs and taxation 13,261 (309,130) (295,869) 11,476 211,892 223,368 Finance costs 6 (5) (15) (20) (1) (4) (5) Net profit/(loss) on ordinary activities before taxation 13,256 (309,145) (295,889) 11,475 211,888 223,363 Taxation 7 1 – 1 (29) – (29) Net profit/(loss) on ordinary activities after taxation 13,257 (309,145) (295,888) 11,446 211,888 223,334 Earnings/(loss) per ordinary share (pence) 9 12.95 (302.05) (289.10) 12.15 224.96 237.11 The total columns of this statement represents the Company’s Statement of Comprehensive Income, prepared in accordance with UK-adopted International Accounting Standards (IASs). The supplementary revenue and capital accounts are both prepared under guidance published by the Association of Investment Companies (AIC). All items in the above statement derive from continuing operations. No operations were acquired or discontinued during the year. All income is attributable to the equity holders of the Company. The Company does not have any other comprehensive income/(loss). The net profit/(loss) for the year disclosed above represents the Company’s total comprehensive income/(loss). The notes on pages 92 to 116 form part of these Financial Statements.

Section 4: Financial Statements 89 Statement of Changes in Equity for the year ended 30 November 2022 The notes on pages 92 to 116 form part of these Financial Statements. Notes Called up share capital Share premium account Capital redemption reserve Special reserve Capital reserves Revenue reserve Total £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 For the year ended 30 November 2022 At 30 November 2021 5,072 225,660 11,905 44,582 637,028 10,901 935,148 Total comprehensive (loss)/income: Net (loss)/profit for the year – – – – (309,145) 13,257 (295,888) Transactions with owners, recorded directly to equity: Ordinary shares issued 14, 15 88 16,479 – – – – 16,567 Share issue costs 15 – (17) – – – – (17) Ordinary shares bought back into treasury 15 – – – (11,487) – – (11,487) Share purchase costs 15 – – – (57) – – (57) Dividends paid 1 8 – – – – – (10,909) (10,909) At 30 November 2022 5,160 242,122 11,905 33,038 327,883 13,249 633,357 For the year ended 30 November 2021 At 30 November 2020 4,376 101,368 11,905 44,580 425,140 8,846 596,215 Total comprehensive income: Net profit for the year – – – – 211,888 11,446 223,334 Transactions with owners, recorded directly to equity: Ordinary shares issued 696 124,418 – – – – 125,114 Share issue costs – (126) – – – – (126) Tender costs written back – – – 2 – – 2 Dividends paid 2 – – – – – (9,391) (9,391) At 30 November 2021 5,072 225,660 11,905 44,582 637,028 10,901 935,148 1 Final dividend of 8.00p per share for the year ended 30 November 2021, declared on 7 February 2022 and paid on 31 March 2022 and interim dividend of 2.60p per share for the year ended 30 November 2022, declared on 20 July 2022 and paid on 26 August 2022. 2 Final dividend of 7.70p per share for the year ended 30 November 2020, declared on 10 February 2021 and paid on 1 April 2021 and interim dividend of 2.50p per share for the year ended 30 November 2021, declared on 23 July 2021 and paid on 27 August 2021. For information on the Company’s distributable reserves please refer to note 15 on page 103.

90 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 Notes 2022 2021 £’000 £’000 Non current assets Investments held at fair value through profit or loss 10 576,771 921,204 Current assets Current tax asset 174 81 Other receivables 12 3,131 2,984 Derivative financial assets held at fair value through profit or loss 11, 16 4,800 – Cash collateral pledged with brokers 11, 16 – 7,380 Cash and cash equivalents 11, 16 58,793 25,223 Total current assets 66,898 35,668 Total assets 643,669 956,872 Current liabilities Other payables 13 (2,240) (13,008) Derivative financial liabilities held at fair value through profit or loss 11, 16 (2,202) (8,716) Liability for cash collateral received 11, 16 (5,870) – Total current liabilities (10,312) (21,724) Net assets 633,357 935,148 Equity attributable to equity holders Called up share capital 14 5,160 5,072 Share premium account 15 242,122 225,660 Capital redemption reserve 15 11,905 11,905 Special reserve 15 33,038 44,582 Capital reserves 15 327,883 637,028 Revenue reserve 15 13,249 10,901 Total equity 633,357 935,148 Net asset value per ordinary share (pence) 9 626.10 921.91 The Financial Statements on pages 88 to 116 were approved and authorised for issue by the Board of Directors on 9 February 2023 and signed on its behalf by Mr Christopher Samuel, Chairman. BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc Registered in England, No. 00594634 Statement of Financial Position as at 30 November 2022 The notes on pages 92 to 116 form part of these Financial Statements.

Section 4: Financial Statements 91 Cash Flow Statement for the year ended 30 November 2022 2022 2021 £’000 £’000 Operating activities Net (loss)/profit on ordinary activities before taxation (295,889) 223,363 Add back finance costs 20 5 Loss/(profit) on investments held at fair value through profit or loss (including transaction costs) 250,583 (192,102) Net loss/(profit) from derivatives (including transaction costs) 55,673 (29,070) Financing costs on derivatives (1,101) (516) Net loss/(profit) on foreign exchange 676 (141) Sales of investments held at fair value through profit or loss 325,600 322,822 Purchases of investments held at fair value through profit or loss (231,750) (461,699) Net (payments)/receipts on closure of derivatives (65,886) 42,306 Increase in other receivables (279) (64) (Decrease)/increase in other payables (8,169) 3,517 (Increase)/decrease in amounts due from brokers (998) 3,977 Decrease in amounts due to brokers (2,599) (4,798) Net cash collateral received/(pledged) 13,250 (8,540) Net cash inflow/(outflow) from operating activities before taxation 39,131 (100,940) Taxation paid (92) (83) Net cash inflow/(outflow) from operating activities 39,039 (101,023) Financing activities Interest paid (20) (5) Cash proceeds from ordinary shares issued 17,680 123,859 Cash paid for ordinary shares bought back into treasury (11,544) – Dividends paid (10,909) (9,391) Net cash (outflow)/inflow from financing activities (4,793) 114,463 Increase in cash and cash equivalents 34,246 13,440 Effect of foreign exchange rate changes (676) 141 Change in cash and cash equivalents 33,570 13,581 Cash and cash equivalents at start of year 25,223 11,642 Cash and cash equivalents at end of year 58,793 25,223 Comprised of: Cash at bank 103 143 Cash Fund 1 58,690 25,080 58,793 25,223 1 Cash Fund represents funds held on deposit with the BlackRock Institutional Cash Series plc – Sterling Liquid Environmentally Aware Fund. The notes on pages 92 to 116 form part of these Financial Statements.

92 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 1. Principal activity The principal activity of the Company is that of an investment trust company within the meaning of Section 1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010. 2. Accounting policies The principal accounting policies adopted by the Company have been applied consistently, other than where new policies have been adopted and are set out below. (a) Basis of preparation On 31 December 2020, International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the European Union at that date was brought into UK law and became UK-adopted International Accounting Standards, with future changes being subject to endorsement by the UK Endorsement Board and with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006 as applicable to companies reporting under those standards. The Company transitioned to UK-adopted International Accounting Standards in its Financial Statements with effect from 1 December 2021. There was no impact or changes in accounting policies from the transition. The Financial Statements have been prepared under the historic cost convention modified by the revaluation of certain financial assets and financial liabilities held at fair value through profit or loss and in accordance with UK- adopted International Accounting Standards (IASs). All of the Company’s operations are of a continuing nature. Insofar as the Statement of Recommended Practice (SORP) for investment trust companies and venture capital trusts issued by the Association of Investment Companies (AIC) in October 2019 and updated in July 2022 is compatible with UK-adopted International Accounting Standards, the Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with the guidance set out in the SORP. Substantially all of the assets of the Company consist of securities that are readily realisable and, accordingly, the Directors believe that the Company has adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the period for the foreseeable future, for the period to 9 February 2024, being a period of at least twelve months from the date of approval of the Financial Statements and therefore consider the going concern assumption to be appropriate. The Directors have considered any potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, its potential longer-term effects on the global economy and the mitigation measures which key service providers, including the Manager, have in place to maintain operational resilience on the going concern of the Company. The Directors have reviewed the income and expense projections and the liquidity of the investment portfolio in making their assessment. The Directors have considered the impact of climate change on the value of the investments included in the Financial Statements and have concluded that there was no further impact of climate change to be considered as the investments are valued based on market pricing as required by IFRS 13. None of the Company’s other assets and liabilities were considered to be potentially impacted by climate change. The Company’s Financial Statements are presented in Sterling, which is the functional currency of the Company and the currency of the primary economic environment in which the Company operates. All values are rounded to the nearest thousand pounds (£’000) except where otherwise indicated. Relevant International Accounting Standards that have yet to be adopted: IFRS 17 – Insurance contracts (effective 1 January 2023). This standard replaces IFRS 4, which currently permits a wide range of accounting practices in accounting for insurance contracts. IFRS 17 will fundamentally change the accounting by all entities that issue insurance contracts and investment contracts with discretionary participation features. This standard is unlikely to have any impact on the Company as it has no insurance contracts. IAS 12 - Deferred tax related to assets and liabilities arising from a single transaction (effective 1 January 2023). The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) has amended IAS 12 Income taxes to require companies to recognise deferred tax on particular transactions that, on initial recognition, give rise to equal amounts of taxable and deductible temporary differences. According to the amended guidance, a temporary difference that arises on initial recognition of an asset or liability is not subject to the initial recognition exemption if that transaction gave rise to equal amounts of taxable and deductible temporary differences. These amendments might have a significant impact on the preparation of financial statements by companies that have substantial balances of right-of-use assets, lease liabilities, decommissioning, restoration and similar liabilities. The impact for those affected would be the recognition of additional deferred tax assets and liabilities. The amendment of this standard is unlikely to have any significant impact on the Company. None of the standards that have been issued but are not yet effective are expected to have a material impact on the Company. (b) Presentation of the Statement of Comprehensive Income In order to better reflect the activities of an investment trust company and in accordance with guidance issued by the AIC, supplementary information which analyses the Statement of Comprehensive Income between items of a revenue and a capital nature has been presented alongside the Statement of Comprehensive Income. Notes to the Financial Statements for the year ended 30 November 2022

Section 4: Financial Statements 93 (c) Segmental reporting The Directors are of the opinion that the Company is engaged in a single segment of business being investment business. (d) Income Dividends receivable on equity shares are recognised as revenue for the year on an ex-dividend basis. Where no ex- dividend date is available, dividends receivable on or before the year end are treated as revenue for the year. Provision is made for any dividends not expected to be received. Special dividends, if any, are treated as a capital or a revenue receipt depending on the facts or circumstances of each particular case. The return on a debt security is recognised on a time apportionment basis so as to reflect the effective yield on the debt security. Deposit interest receivable is accounted for on an accruals basis. Interest income from the Cash Fund is accounted for on an accruals basis. Where the Company has elected to receive its dividends in the form of additional shares rather than in cash, the cash equivalent of the dividend is recognised as income. Any excess in the value of the shares received over the amount of the cash dividend is recognised in capital. (e) Expenses All expenses, including finance costs, are accounted for on an accruals basis. Expenses have been charged wholly to the revenue column of the Statement of Comprehensive Income, except as follows: • expenses which are incidental to the acquisition or sale of an investment are charged to the capital column of the Statement of Comprehensive Income. Details of transaction costs on the purchases and sales of investments are disclosed within note 10 to the Financial Statements on page 100; • expenses are treated as capital where a connection with the maintenance or enhancement of the value of the investments can be demonstrated; • the investment management fee and finance costs have been allocated 75% to the capital column and 25% to the revenue column of the Statement of Comprehensive Income in line with the Board’s expected long term split of returns, in the form of capital gains and income, respectively, from the investment portfolio; and • performance fees are allocated 100% to the capital column of the Statement of Comprehensive Income as fees are generated in connection with enhancing the value of the investment portfolio. (f) Taxation The tax expense represents the sum of the tax currently payable and deferred tax. The tax currently payable is based on the taxable profit for the year. Taxable profit differs from net profit as reported in the Statement of Comprehensive Income because it excludes items of income or expenses that are taxable or deductible in other years and it further excludes items that are never taxable or deductible. The Company’s liability for current tax is calculated using tax rates that were applicable at the balance sheet date. Where expenses are allocated between capital and revenue accounts, any tax relief in respect of expenses is allocated between capital and revenue returns on the marginal basis using the Company’s effective rate of corporation tax for the accounting period. Deferred taxation is recognised in respect of all temporary differences that have originated but not reversed at the financial reporting date, where transactions or events that result in an obligation to pay more taxation in the future or right to pay less taxation in the future have occurred at the financial reporting date. This is subject to deferred taxation assets only being recognised if it is considered more likely than not that there will be suitable profits from which the future reversal of the temporary differences can be deducted. Deferred taxation assets and liabilities are measured at the rates applicable to the legal jurisdictions in which they arise. (g) Investments held at fair value through profit or loss In accordance with IFRS 9, the Company classifies its investments at initial recognition as held at fair value through profit or loss and are managed and evaluated on a fair value basis in accordance with its investment strategy and business model. All investments are measured initially and subsequently at fair value through profit or loss. Purchases of investments are recognised on a trade date basis. Sales of investments are recognised at the trade date of the disposal. The fair value of the financial investments is based on their quoted bid price at the financial reporting date, without deduction for the estimated selling costs. This policy applies to all current and non-current asset investments held by the Company. Changes in the value of investments held at fair value through profit or loss and gains and losses on disposal are recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Income as “Net profit/(loss) on investments held at fair value through profit or loss”. Also included within the heading are transaction costs in relation to the purchase or sale of investments.

94 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 2. Accounting policies continued For all financial instruments not traded in an active market, the fair value is determined by using various valuation techniques. Valuation techniques include market approach (i.e., using recent arm’s length market transactions adjusted as necessary and reference to the current market value of another instrument that is substantially the same) and the income approach (e.g., discounted cash flow analysis and option pricing models making use of available and supportable market data where possible). See note 2(o) below. (h) Derivatives The Company can hold long and short positions in contracts for difference (CFDs) and index futures which are held at fair value based on the bid prices of the underlying securities in respect of long positions and the offer prices of the underlying securities in respect of short positions. Profits and losses on derivative transactions are recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Income. They are shown in the capital column of the Statement of Comprehensive Income if they are of a capital nature and are shown in the revenue column of the Statement of Comprehensive Income if they are of a revenue nature. To the extent that any profits or losses are of a mixed revenue and capital nature, they are apportioned between revenue and capital accordingly. Derivative assets and derivative liabilities that are subject to netting arrangements are offset in the Statement of Financial Position. (i) Other receivables and other payables Other receivables and other payables do not carry any interest and are short term in nature and are accordingly stated on an amortised cost basis. (j) Dividends payable Under IASs, final dividends should not be accrued in the Financial Statements unless they have been approved by shareholders before the financial reporting date. Interim dividends should not be recognised in the Financial Statements unless they have been paid. Dividends payable to equity shareholders are recognised in the Statement of Changes in Equity. (k) Foreign currency translation Transactions involving foreign currencies are converted at the rate ruling at the date of the transaction. Foreign currency monetary assets and liabilities and non-monetary assets held at fair value are translated into Sterling at the rate ruling on the financial reporting date. Foreign exchange differences arising on translation are recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Income as a revenue or capital item depending on the income or expense to which they relate. For investment transactions and investments held at the year end, denominated in a foreign currency, the resulting gains or losses are included in the gain on investments held at fair value through profit or loss in the Statement of Comprehensive Income. (l) Cash and cash equivalents Cash comprises cash in hand and on demand deposits. Cash equivalents are short term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and that are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value. The Cash Fund is managed by BlackRock Asset Management Ireland Limited and is subject to fees and expenses which are capped at 0.03% of the NAV. The investment is managed as part of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents as defined under IAS 7 and is presented as a cash equivalent in the Financial Statements. (m) Bank borrowings Bank overdrafts are recorded as the proceeds received. Finance charges, including any premium payable on settlement or redemption and direct issue costs, are accounted for on an accruals basis in the Statement of Comprehensive Income using the effective interest rate method and are added to the carrying amount of the instruments to the extent that they are not settled in the period in which they arise. (n) Share repurchases, share reissues and new share issues Shares repurchased and subsequently cancelled – share capital is reduced by the nominal value of the shares repurchased, and the capital redemption reserve is correspondingly increased in accordance with Section 733 of the Companies Act 2006. The full cost of the repurchase is charged to the special reserve. Shares repurchased and held in treasury – the full cost of the repurchase is charged to the special reserve. Where treasury shares are subsequently re-issued: • amounts received to the extent of the repurchase price are credited to the special reserve; and • any surplus received in excess of the repurchase price is taken to the share premium account. Where new shares are issued, the par value is taken to called up share capital and amounts received to the extent of any surplus received in excess of the par value are taken to the share premium account. Share issue costs are charged to the share premium account. Costs on share reissues are charged to the special reserve and capital reserves. (o) Critical accounting estimates and judgements The Directors of the Company make estimates and assumptions concerning the future. The resulting accounting estimates and assumptions will, by definition, seldom equal the related actual results. Estimates and judgements are regularly evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The Directors do not believe that any accounting judgements or estimates have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amount of assets and liabilities within the next financial year. There are no critical accounting estimates or judgements. Notes to the Financial Statements continued

Section 4: Financial Statements 95 3. Income 2022 2021 £’000 £’000 Investment income: UK dividends 9,654 8,940 UK special dividends 839 1,320 UK stock dividends 68 108 UK REIT dividends 509 464 Overseas dividends 1,515 1,186 Overseas special dividends – 170 Total investment income 1 12,585 12,188 Net income from derivatives 1,526 1,272 Other income: Deposit interest 111 – Interest from Cash Fund 594 7 Collateral interest 44 – 749 7 Total income 14,860 13,467 1 UK and overseas dividends are presented based on the country of domicile of the respective underlying portfolio company. Dividends and interest received in cash during the year amounted to £12,223,000 and £615,000 (2021: £11,919,000 and £6,000). Special dividends of £91,000 have been recognised in capital during the year (2021: £nil).

96 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 4. Investment management and performance fees 2022 2021 Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 Investment management fee 756 2,269 3,025 913 2,739 3,652 Performance fee – – – – 6,655 6,655 Total 756 2,269 3,025 913 9,394 10,307 The performance fee is 15% of the Net Asset Value total return outperformance of the Benchmark Index, measured and annualised over a two year rolling basis and applied on the average Gross Assets of that period. Outperformance is the amount by which the Fund Return arithmetically exceeds the Benchmark Return. The performance fee is calculated and accrued on a daily basis and payable on 30 November each year in relation to the two year performance period ending on that date. Gross Assets are defined as the value at risk, the gross asset value of the long-only portfolio plus the gross value of the underlying equities, long and short, to which the Company is exposed through derivatives including CFDs and index futures. There is a Cap (the “Capped amount” or the “Cap”) on the annual total management and performance fees of 1.25% of average Gross Assets over a two year period which has the effect of capping annual performance fees at circa 0.9%. The amount of excess outperformance on which a performance fee has not been paid in a financial year due to the application of the Cap, can be carried forward to offset against future shortfall returns. As at 30 November 2022, the carried forward unpaid outperformance available to offset against future shortfall returns was 10.7% (30 November 2021: 14.6%). On the first day of the financial year, any performance fee for the ongoing performance period not yet recognised, due to the application of the Cap in the prior financial year, is accrued in the daily NAV released to the London Stock Exchange on that day. Performance fees have been wholly allocated to the capital account of the Statement of Comprehensive Income as the performance has been predominantly generated through capital returns from the investment portfolio. For the year ended 30 November 2022, no performance fee has been accrued (2021: £6,655,000). The investment management fee is calculated at the rate of 0.35% per annum on month end Gross Assets. The management fee is charged 25% to revenue account and 75% to capital account of the Statement of Comprehensive Income. There is no additional fee for company secretarial and administration services. Notes to the Financial Statements continued

Section 4: Financial Statements 97 5. Other operating expenses 2022 2021 £’000 £’000 Allocated to revenue: Custody fee 8 12 Auditor’s remuneration 1 52 52 Registrar’s fee 45 47 Directors’ emoluments 2 205 184 Broker fees 35 45 Depositary fees 83 92 Marketing fees 153 157 FCA fees 28 19 Printing and postage fees 42 76 AIC fees 21 16 Stock exchange listing fees 102 268 Write back of prior year expenses 3 (26) – Other administrative costs 95 110 843 1,078 Allocated to capital: Custody transaction charges 4 20 27 863 1,105 The Company’s ongoing charges 5 , calculated as a percentage of average daily net assets and using the management fee and all other operating expenses, excluding performance fees, finance costs, direct transaction costs, custody transaction charges, VAT recovered, taxation, prior year expenses written back and certain non-recurring items, were: 0.54% 0.57% The Company’s ongoing charges 5 , calculated as a percentage of average daily net assets and using the management fee and all other operating expenses and including performance fees but excluding finance costs, direct transaction costs, custody transaction charges, VAT recovered, taxation, prior year expenses written back and certain non-recurring items, were: 0.54% 1.38% 1 No non-audit services were provided by the Company’s auditors. 2 Further information on Directors’ emoluments can be found in the Directors’ Remuneration Report on page 70. The Company has no employees. 3 Relates to Directors’ expenses, legal fees, registration fees and miscellaneous fees written back during the year (2021: no expenses were written back). 4 For the year ended 30 November 2022, expenses of £20,000 (2021: £27,000) were charged to the capital account of the Statement of Comprehensive Income. These relate to transaction costs charged by the Custodian on sale and purchase trades. 5 Alternative Performance Measures, see Glossary on pages 131 to 133.

98 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 6. Finance costs 2022 2021 Revenue £’000 Capital £’000 Total £’000 Revenue £’000 Capital £’000 Total £’000 Interest payable - bank overdraft – 1 1 1 4 5 Collateral interest paid 5 14 19 – – – 5 15 20 1 4 5 7. Taxation (a) Analysis of (credit)/charge in year 2022 2021 Revenue £’000 Capital £’000 Total £’000 Revenue £’000 Capital £’000 Total £’000 Current taxation: Overseas tax suffered – – – 30 – 30 Prior year adjustment (1) – (1) (1) – (1) Total taxation (credit)/charge (note 7(b)) (1) – (1) 29 – 29 (b) Factors affecting total taxation (credit)/charge for the year The taxation assessed for the year is higher (2021: lower) than the standard rate of corporation tax in the UK of 19.00% (2021: 19.00%). The differences are explained below: 2022 2021 Revenue £’000 Capital £’000 Total £’000 Revenue £’000 Capital £’000 Total £’000 Profit/(loss) on ordinary activities before taxation 13,256 (309,145) (295,889) 11,475 211,888 223,363 Taxation on profit/(loss) on ordinary activities at standard rate of corporation tax of 19.00% (2021: 19.00%) 2,519 (58,738) (56,219) 2,180 40,259 42,439 Effects of: Non taxable UK dividend income (2,001) (17) (2,018) (1,969) – (1,969) Non taxable overseas dividend income (288) – (288) (258) – (258) Overseas tax suffered – – – 30 – 30 Net loss/(profit) on investments held at fair value through profit or loss – 47,611 47,611 – (36,500) (36,500) Net loss/(profit) from derivatives – 10,578 10,578 – (5,523) (5,523) Non-taxable stock dividend income (13) – (13) – – – Net foreign exchange loss/(profit) – 128 128 – (27) (27) Disallowed expenses – 4 4 – 5 5 Management expenses not (utilised)/relieved (217) 434 217 47 1,786 1,833 Prior year adjustment (1) – (1) (1) – (1) (2,520) 58,738 56,218 (2,151) (40,259) (42,410) Total taxation (credit)/charge for the year (note 7(a)) (1) – (1) 29 – 29 For the year ended/as at 30 November 2022 the Company had net surplus management expenses of £102.7 million (2021: £101.6 million) and a non-trade loan relationship deficit of £49.2 million (2021: £49.2 million). A deferred tax asset has not been recognised in respect of these losses because the Company is not expected to generate taxable income in a future period in excess of the deductible expenses of that future period. Accordingly, it is unlikely that the Company will be able to reduce future tax liabilities through the use of existing tax losses. Accordingly, the deferred tax asset of £38.0 million (2021: £37.7 million) has not been recognised as at 30 November 2022 which has been calculated based on a prospective corporation tax rate from 1 April 2023 of 25%, as enacted by the Finance Act 2021. Notes to the Financial Statements continued

Section 4: Financial Statements 99 8. Dividends 2022 2021 Dividends paid on equity shares: Record date Payment date £’000 £’000 Final dividend of 8.00p per share for the year ended 30 November 2021 (2020: 7.70p) 18 February 2022 31 March 2022 8,255 6,972 Interim dividend of 2.60p per share for the year ended 30 November 2022 (2021: 2.50p) 29 July 2022 26 August 2022 2,654 2,419 10,909 9,391 The total dividends payable in respect of the year ended 30 November 2022 which form the basis of Section 1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010 and Section 833 of the Companies Act 2006, and the amounts proposed, meet the relevant requirements as set out in this legislation. 2022 2021 Dividends paid or declared on equity shares: £’000 £’000 Interim dividend of 2.60p per share for the year ended 30 November 2022 (2021: 2.50p) 2,654 2,419 Final dividend of 8.50p per share for the year ended 30 November 2022 1 (2021: 8.00p) 8,595 8,255 11,249 10,674 1 Based on 101,113,864 ordinary shares in issue on 7 February 2023. 9. Earnings/(loss) and net asset value per ordinary share Total revenue, capital (loss)/earnings and net asset value per ordinary share are shown below and have been calculated using the following: Year ended 30 November 2022 Year ended 30 November 2021 Net revenue profit attributable to ordinary shareholders (£’000) 13,257 11,446 Net capital (loss)/profit attributable to ordinary shareholders (£’000) (309,145) 211,888 Total (loss)/profit attributable to ordinary shareholders (£’000) (295,888) 223,334 Equity shareholders’ funds (£’000) as at 30 November 633,357 935,148 The weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the year on which the earnings per ordinary share was calculated was: 102,346,782 94,190,181 The actual number of ordinary shares in issue at the year end on which the net asset value per ordinary share was calculated was: 101,158,864 101,435,964 Earnings/(loss) per ordinary share Revenue earnings per share (pence) – basic and diluted 12.95 12.15 Capital (loss)/earnings per share (pence) – basic and diluted (302.05) 224.96 Total (loss)/earnings per share (pence) - basic and diluted (289.10) 237.11 As at 30 November 2022 As at 30 November 2021 Net asset value per ordinary share (pence) 626.10 921.91 Ordinary share price (pence) 595.00 935.00 There were no dilutive securities at the year end.

100 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 10. Investments held at fair value through profit or loss 2022 2021 £’000 £’000 UK listed equity investments held at fair value through profit or loss 386,123 610,695 AIM traded stocks 190,648 310,509 Total value of financial asset investments at 30 November 576,771 921,204 Opening book cost of investments 674,311 446,195 Investment holding gains 246,893 144,030 Opening fair value 921,204 590,225 Analysis of transactions made during the year: Purchases at cost 231,750 461,699 Sales proceeds received (325,600) (322,822) (Losses)/gains on investments 1 (250,583) 192,102 Closing fair value 576,771 921,204 Closing book cost of investments 572,761 674,311 Closing investment holding gains 4,010 246,893 Closing fair value 576,771 921,204 1 The (losses)/gains on investment do not include special dividends totalling £91,000 (2021: £nil) that were recognised in capital (please see note 3). The Company received £325,600,000 (2021: £322,822,000) from investments sold in the year. The book cost of these investments when they were purchased was £333,300,000 (2021: £233,583,000). These investments have been revalued over time and until they were sold any unrealised gains/losses were included in the fair value of investments. During the year, transaction costs of £858,000 (2021: £1,619,000) were incurred on the acquisition of investments. Costs relating to the disposal of investments during the year amounted to £230,000 (2021: £224,000). All transactions costs have been included within the capital reserves. Notes to the Financial Statements continued

Section 4: Financial Statements 101 11. Derivatives The Company may use a variety of derivative contracts, and during the year entered into a number of index futures contracts and contracts for difference (CFDs). CFDs are synthetic equities and are valued by reference to the market values of the investments’ underlying securities. The sources of the return under the derivative contract (e.g., notional dividends, financing costs, interest returns and realised and unrealised gains and losses) are allocated to the revenue and capital accounts in alignment with the nature of the underlying source of income and in accordance with the guidance given in the AIC SORP. Notional dividend income or expense arising on long or short positions is apportioned wholly to the revenue account. Notional interest income on short positions is allocated wholly to the revenue account. Notional interest expense on long and short positions is apportioned between revenue and capital in accordance with the Board’s long term expected returns of the Company (currently determined to be 25% to revenue and 75% to capital). Changes in value relating to underlying price movements of securities in relation to long and short derivative exposures are allocated to capital. A summary of the various sources of return on the derivative contracts is given in the table below. 2022 2021 Revenue £’000 Capital £’000 Total £’000 Revenue £’000 Capital £’000 Total £’000 Net realised (losses)/gains relating to underlying price movements – (65,886) (65,886) – 42,306 42,306 Net change in unrealised gains/(losses) relating to underlying price movements – 11,314 11,314 – (12,720) (12,720) Notional dividend income on long positions 2,378 – 2,378 1,734 – 1,734 Notional dividend expense on short positions (490) – (490) (290) – (290) Notional interest expense on long positions (369) (1,111) (1,480) (124) (367) (491) Notional interest income/(expense) on short positions 7 10 17 (48) (149) (197) Total return on derivative contracts for the year 1,526 (55,673) (54,147) 1,272 29,070 30,342 The net fair values of derivative financial assets and liabilities are set out in the table below: 2022 2021 £’000 £’000 Derivative financial assets held at fair value through profit or loss 4,800 – Derivative financial liabilities held at fair value through profit or loss (2,202) (8,716) Total net derivative financial assets/(liabilities) 2,598 (8,716) The fair value of derivative positions at 30 November 2022 was positive £2,598,000 (2021: negative £8,716,000), comprising gross revaluation gains of £5,912,000 (2021: £3,439,000) and gross revaluation losses of £3,314,000 (2021: £12,155,000). Net realised losses of £65,886,000 (2021: gains of £42,306,000) comprised realised gains of £79,832,000 (2021: £122,906,000) and realised losses of £145,718,000 (2021: £80,600,000). As at 30 November 2022, the Company held cash and cash equivalent balances of £58,793,000 (2021: £25,223,000). The Company also pledged cash of £nil (2021: £7,380,000) on margin accounts with counterparty brokers. This cash represents collateral posted to broker margin accounts in relation to amounts due to brokers in respect of unrealised losses on open derivative positions. As at 30 November 2022 the Company also owed £5,870,000 (2021: £nil) to brokers in respect of cash collateral received relating to amounts owed by these brokers to cover unrealised gains on open derivative positions. These cash balances are disclosed within cash and cash equivalents on the Statement of Financial Position of £58,793,000 (2021: £25,223,000), and an equivalent creditor of £5,870,000 (2021: £nil) is also shown to reflect the economic entitlement of the broker to these margins until such a time as the open derivative positions are closed out and the profits are realised. To the extent there are any unrealised losses on CFD contracts, the Company will transfer margin monies across to these broker margin deposit accounts. The Investment Manager monitors margin positions on a daily basis to ensure any margin deposit balances are minimised and any amounts owed to the Company are transferred on a timely basis. In the event of default, legal ownership of any monies held in the margin deposit accounts resides with the counterparty broker.

102 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 12. Other receivables 2022 2021 £’000 £’000 Amounts due from brokers 2,033 1,035 Share issue receivable – 1,130 Prepayments and accrued income 1,098 819 3,131 2,984 13. Other payables 2022 2021 £’000 £’000 Amounts due to brokers 443 3,042 Accruals for expenses and interest payable 1,797 3,311 Performance fee accrual – 6,655 2,240 13,008 14. Called up share capital Ordinary shares in issue Treasury shares Total shares Nominal value number number number £’000 Allotted, called up and fully paid share capital comprised: Ordinary shares of 5 pence each: At 30 November 2021 101,435,964 – 101,435,964 5,072 Ordinary shares issued 1,773,900 – 1,773,900 88 Ordinary shares bought back into treasury (2,051,000) 2,051,000 – – At 30 November 2022 101,158,864 2,051,000 103,209,864 5,160 During the year ended 30 November 2022, the Company bought back 2,051,000 shares into treasury (2021: nil) for a total consideration of £11,544,000 (2021: £nil) including costs. During the year ended 30 November 2022, the Company issued 1,773,900 new shares (2021: 13,917,035) for a total consideration of £16,550,000 (2021: £124,988,000) including costs. Since 30 November 2022 and up to the date of this report, no shares have been reissued. 45,000 shares have been bought back into treasury for a total consideration of £276,000. The ordinary shares give shareholders voting rights, the entitlement to all of the capital growth in the Company’s assets and to all income from the Company that is resolved to be distributed. Notes to the Financial Statements continued

Section 4: Financial Statements 103 15. Reserves Distributable reserves Share premium account Capital redemption reserve Special reserve Capital reserve arising on investments sold Capital reserve arising on revaluation of investments held Revenue reserve £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 At 30 November 2021 225,660 11,905 44,582 398,865 238,163 10,901 Movement during the year: Total comprehensive (loss)/income (Loss)/profit for the year – – – (77,591) (231,554) 13,257 Transactions with owners, recorded directly to equity: Ordinary shares issued 16,479 – – – – – Share issue costs (17) – – – – – Ordinary shares bought back into treasury – – (11,487) – – – Share purchase costs – – (57) – – – Dividends paid – – – – – (10,909) At 30 November 2022 242,122 11,905 33,038 321,274 6,609 13,249 The share premium account and capital redemption reserves are not distributable reserves under the Companies Act 2006. In accordance with ICAEW Technical Release 02/17BL on Guidance on Realised and Distributable Profits under the Companies Act 2006, the special reserve and capital reserves may be used as distributable reserves for all purposes and, in particular, the repurchase by the Company of its ordinary shares and for payments as dividends. In accordance with the Company’s Articles of Association, the special reserve, capital reserves and the revenue reserve may be distributed by way of dividend. The gain on capital reserve arising on the revaluation of investments of £6,609,000 (2021: gain of £238,163,000) is subject to fair value movements and may not be readily realisable at short notice, as such any gains may not be entirely distributable. The investments are subject to financial risks; as such capital reserves (arising on investments sold) and the revenue reserve may not be entirely distributable if a loss occurred during the realisation of these investments. 16. Risk management policies and procedures The Company’s investment activities expose it to various types of risks which are associated with the financial instruments and markets in which it invests. The following information is not intended to be a comprehensive summary of all risks and shareholders should refer to the Alternative Investment Fund Managers’ Directive FUND 3.2.2R Disclosures which can be found at www.blackrock.com/uk/thrg for a more detailed discussion of the risks inherent in investing in the Company. Risk management framework The following information refers to the risk management framework of the Alternative Investment Fund Manager (AIFM). However, as disclosed in the Corporate Governance Statement on pages 63 to 68 and in the Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities on page 79, it is the ultimate responsibility of the Board to ensure that the Company’s risks are appropriately monitored, and to the extent that elements of this are delegated to third party service providers, the Board is responsible for ensuring that the relevant parties are discharging their duties in accordance with the terms of the relevant agreements and taking appropriate action to the extent issues are identified. The Directors of the AIFM review quarterly investment performance reports and receive semi-annual presentations in person from the Investment Manager covering the Company’s performance and risk profile during the year. The AIFM has delegated the day-to-day administration of the investment programme to the Investment Manager. The Investment Manager is also responsible for ensuring that the Company is managed within the terms of its investment guidelines and limits set out in the Alternative Investment Fund Managers’ Directive FUND 3.2.2R Disclosures which can be found at www.blackrock.com/uk/thrg.

104 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 16. Risk management policies and procedures continued The AIFM is responsible for monitoring investment performance, product risk monitoring and oversight and has the responsibility for the monitoring and oversight of regulatory and operational risk for the Company. The Directors of the AIFM have appointed a Risk Manager who has responsibility for the daily risk management process with assistance from key risk management personnel of the Investment Manager, including members of the Risk and Quantitative Analysis Group (RQA) which is a centralised group which performs an independent risk management function. RQA independently identifies, measures and monitors investment risk, including climate-related risk, and tracks the actual risk management practices being deployed across the Company. By breaking down the components of the process, RQA has the ability to determine if the appropriate risk management processes are in place. This captures the risk management tools employed, how the levels of risk are controlled, ensuring risk/return is considered in portfolio construction and reviewing outcomes. The AIFM reports to the Audit Committee twice yearly on key risk metrics and risk management processes; in addition, the Depositary monitors the performance of the AIFM and reports to the Audit Committee semi-annually. Any significant issues are reported to the Board as they arise. Risk exposures The risk exposures of the Company are set out as follows: (a) Market risk Market risk arises mainly from uncertainty about future values of financial instruments influenced by currency, interest rate and other price movements. It represents the potential loss the Company may suffer through holding market positions in financial instruments in the face of market movements. A key metric RQA uses to measure market risk is Value-at-Risk (VaR) which encompasses price, currency and interest rate risk. VaR is a statistical risk measure that estimates the potential portfolio loss from adverse market moves in an ordinary market environment. VaR analysis reflects the interdependencies between risk variables (including foreign currency risk, interest rate risk and other price risk), unlike a traditional sensitivity analysis. The VaR calculations are based on a confidence level of 99% with a holding period of not greater than one day and a historical observation period of not less than one year (250 days). A VaR number is defined at a specified probability and a specified time horizon. A 99% one day VaR means that the expectation is that 99% of the time over a one day period the Company will lose less than this number in percentage terms. Therefore, higher VaR numbers indicate higher risk. It is noted that the use of VaR methodology has limitations, namely assumptions that risk factor returns are normally distributed and that the use of historical market data as a basis for estimating future events does not encompass all possible scenarios, particularly those that are of an extreme nature and that the use of a specified confidence level (e.g., 99%) does not take into account losses that occur beyond this level. There is some probability that the loss could be greater than the VaR percentage amounts. These limitations, and the nature of the VaR measure, mean that the Company can neither guarantee that losses will not exceed the VaR amounts indicated, nor that losses in excess of the VaR amounts will not occur more frequently. The one-day VaR as at 30 November 2022 and 30 November 2021 (based on a 99% confidence level) was 4.58% and 2.66%, respectively. (i) Market risk arising from other price risk Exposure to other price risk Other price risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market prices (other than those arising from interest rate risk or currency risk), whether those changes are caused by factors specific to the individual financial instrument or its issuer, or factors affecting similar financial instruments traded in the market. Local, regional or global events such as war, acts of terrorism, the spread of infectious illness or other public health issues, recessions, climate change, or other events could have a significant impact on the Company and the market price of its investments. The current environment of heightened geo-political risk given the Russian invasion of Ukraine has undermined investor confidence and market direction. In addition to the tragic and devastating events in Ukraine, the war has constricted supplies of key commodities, pushing prices up and creating a level of market uncertainty and volatility which is likely to persist for some time. Notes to the Financial Statements continued

Section 4: Financial Statements 105 The impact of the coronavirus outbreak was profound across all aspects of society. In developed economies, it is clear that the worst of the impact is now over. However, there is an expectation that seasonal peaks and new variants could give rise to renewed travel restrictions, enhanced health screenings at ports of entry and elsewhere, disruption of and delays in healthcare service preparation and delivery and supply chain disruptions which will create ongoing challenges. Widescale and comprehensive vaccination programmes have been put in place by many countries which have had a positive effect. Nevertheless, the impact of COVID-19 continues to adversely affect the economies of many nations across the globe and this in turn may continue to impact investments held by the Company. The Company is exposed to market price risk arising from its equity investments and its exposure to derivative positions. The movements in the prices of these investments result in movements in the performance of the Company. Other price risk sensitivity has been covered by the VaR analysis under the market risk section above. The Company’s exposure to other changes in market prices at 30 November 2022 on its equity investments was £576,771,000 (2021: £921,204,000). In addition, the Company’s gross market exposure to these price changes through its derivatives exposure is set out below. Use of derivatives The Company may utilise both contracts for difference (CFDs) and index futures, as part of its investment policy. These instruments can be highly volatile and potentially expose investors to a higher risk of loss. The low initial margin deposits normally required to establish a position in such instruments permit a high degree of leverage in respect of each transaction. As a result, depending on the type of instrument, a relatively small movement in the price of a contract may result in a profit or loss which is high in proportion to the value of the net exposures in the underlying derivative positions. The Company’s current investment strategy specifically utilises CFDs and index futures. The Company limits the gross market exposure, and therefore the leverage, of this strategy to approximately 30% of the Company’s net assets. The long and short CFD positions have a linear performance to referenced stocks quoted on exchanges and therefore have a volatility profile similar to the underlying stocks. See ‘Management of OTC financial derivative instruments’ paragraph below for gearing through the use of derivatives. Management of other price risk By diversifying the portfolio, where this is appropriate and consistent with the Company’s objective, the risk that a price change of a particular investment will have a material impact on the NAV of the Company is reduced which is in line with the investment objective of the Company. Management of over-the-counter (OTC) financial derivative instruments Economic exposure through derivatives is restricted to 30% of the net asset value of the Company. The gross value represents the aggregate of the long and short exposure without netting and so within this limit market exposure may be significantly less. The net exposure refers to the market exposure the Company has to the underlying securities on long derivative positions, less the market exposure of the underlying securities on which the Company has taken in short derivative positions. Further definitions are provided in the Glossary on pages 131 to 133. To the extent derivatives are used to gear the Company’s portfolio, aggregate leverage through the use of derivatives will not exceed 30% of net assets. The Board’s policy is that net gearing, borrowing less cash, should not exceed 20% of gross assets. Exposures are monitored daily by the Investment Manager and its independent risk management team and can be closed out at any time by the Company, subject to market liquidity. The Company’s Board also reviews exposures regularly. The CFD positions are diversified across sectors and geographies comprising 37 positions as at 30 November 2022 (2021: 62).

106 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 16. Risk management policies and procedures continued The gross underlying notional exposures through derivatives at 30 November 2022 and 30 November 2021 were: 2022 £’000 % of net assets 2021 £’000 % of net assets Gross exposure relating to long derivative positions 99,602 15.7 213,568 22.8 Gross exposure relating to short derivative positions 15,637 2.5 24,925 2.7 Gross economic exposure subject to a 30% restriction (see above) 115,239 18.2 238,493 25.5 Net market exposure 83,965 13.2 188,643 20.1 Concentration of exposure to market risks An analysis of the Company’s investment portfolio, and sector analysis, is shown on pages 21 to 29. At 30 November 2022, this shows the majority of the portfolio’s value is in UK companies. Accordingly, there is concentration of exposure to the UK, although it is recognised that an investment’s country of domicile or of listing does not necessarily equate to its exposure to the economic conditions in that country. (ii) Market risk arising from foreign currency risk Exposure to foreign currency risk Foreign currency risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in foreign exchange rates. Foreign currency sensitivity risk has been covered by the VaR analysis under the market risk section. As the Company’s objective is to achieve capital growth for shareholders through investment mainly in smaller UK quoted companies, substantially all of the Company’s assets are Sterling denominated. Up to 15% of the Company’s portfolio can be invested in overseas companies. Consequently, at any time a very small proportion of the Company’s assets, liabilities and income may be denominated in currencies other than Sterling (the Company’s functional currency and that in which it reports its results). There were five non-Sterling denominated long investment positions and there were no non-Sterling denominated short investment positions held within the Company’s portfolio at 30 November 2022 (2021: fourteen long positions, one short position). The fair values of the Company’s monetary items which have foreign currency exposure at 30 November 2022 and 30 November 2021 are shown below. Where the Company’s equity investments which are not monetary items are denominated in a foreign currency, they have been included separately in the analysis so as to show the overall level of exposure. Australian Dollar Euro Swedish Krona Swiss Franc US Dollar 2022 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 Receivables (due from brokers, dividends and other income receivable) – – – – 1,272 Derivatives – long positions (gross exposure) 3,913 12,872 – – 11,370 Derivatives – short positions (gross exposure) – – – – – Payables (7) (87) – – (22) Total foreign currency exposure on net monetary items 3,906 12,785 – – 12,620 Investments at fair value through profit and loss that are equities – 5,227 – – 619 Total net foreign currency exposure 3,906 18,012 – – 13,239 Total net foreign currency exposure as a % of net assets 0.62% 2.84% – – 2.09% Notes to the Financial Statements continued

Section 4: Financial Statements 107 Australian Dollar Euro Swedish Krona Swiss Franc US Dollar 2021 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 Receivables (due from brokers, dividends and other income receivable) – 3 304 15 3 Derivatives – long positions (gross exposure) 7,645 11,697 9,516 – 49,701 Derivatives – short positions (gross exposure) – (2,954) – – – Payables (1) – (3) – (515) Total foreign currency exposure on net monetary items 7,644 8,746 9,817 15 49,189 Investments at fair value through profit and loss that are equities – – – – – Total net foreign currency exposure 7,644 8,746 9,817 15 49,189 Total net foreign currency exposure as a % of net assets 0.82% 0.94% 1.05% – 5.26% Management of foreign currency risk The Investment Manager monitors the Company’s exposure to foreign currencies on a daily basis and reports to the Board of the Company on a regular basis. The Investment Manager measures the risk to the Company of the foreign currency exposure by considering the effect on the Company’s net asset value and income of a movement in the exchange rate to which the Company’s assets, liabilities, income and expenses are exposed. The Company does not use financial instruments to mitigate the currency exposure in the period between the time that income is included in the Financial Statements and its receipt. Although permitted, derivative contracts are not used to hedge against exposure to foreign currency risk. Consequently, the Company is exposed to risks that the exchange rate of its reporting currencies relative to other currencies may change in a manner which has an adverse effect on the value of the portion of the Company’s assets which are denominated in currencies other than their own currencies. (iii) Market risk arising from interest rate risk Exposure to interest rate risk Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value of future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market interest rates. The Company is exposed to interest rate risk specifically through its cash holdings and on positions within the CFD portfolio. Interest rate movements may affect the level of income receivable from any cash at bank and on deposits. The effect of interest rate changes on the earnings of the companies held within the portfolio may have a significant impact on the valuation of the Company’s investments. Movements in interest rates will also have an impact on the financing costs of the CFD derivative contracts. Interest rate sensitivity risk has been covered by the VaR analysis under the market risk section. Interest rate exposure The exposure at 30 November 2022 and 30 November 2021 of financial assets and liabilities to interest rate risk is shown by reference to: • floating interest rates – when the interest rate is due to be re-set; and • fixed interest rates – when the financial instrument is due for repayment.

108 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 16. Risk management policies and procedures continued 2022 Within one year 2021 Within one year £’000 £’000 Exposure to floating interest rates: Derivative contracts – Notional long derivative positions 99,602 213,568 – Notional short derivative positions (15,637) (24,925) Cash Fund 58,690 25,080 Cash collateral held with brokers – 7,380 Cash at bank 103 143 Cash collateral received (5,870) – Management of interest rate risk The Company is exposed to interest rate risk on cash holdings and CFD positions. The Company incurs charges on long positions when held. The Company incurred a charge based on LIBOR plus 25 basis points for long CFD positions and received a benefit based on LIBOR minus 35 basis points for short positions. For non-Sterling long positions, the Company incurred a charge based on EURIBOR plus 25 basis points for positions denominated in Euros, Bank Bill Swap Rate plus 25 basis points for positions denominated in Australian Dollars, CHF LIBOR plus 30 basis points for positions denominated in Swiss Francs and the Federal Funds Rate plus 18 basis points for positions denominated in US Dollars. For non-Sterling short positions, the Company received a benefit based on EURIBOR minus 25 basis points for positions denominated in Euros and CHF LIBOR minus 30 basis points for positions denominated in Swiss Francs. Notional interest is determined on a gross basis; i.e., for this purpose long and short positions or exposures within the master agreement are not netted for calculation of notional interest. Further details of notional interest arising in the year in relation to derivative positions are given within note 11 to the Financial Statements on page 101. The Company has additional exposure to interest rate risk in relation to its holding in the Cash Fund. Interest received on this holding in the year was on average 1.27% (2021: 0.10%). The Company does not have any fixed rate exposure at 30 November 2022 or 30 November 2021. Interest rates received on cash balances or paid on bank borrowings, respectively, is set out in the table below: Interest received Interest paid 2022 % % Sterling 0.96 4.20 Interest received Interest paid 2021 % % Sterling – 3.10 (b) Counterparty credit risk Credit risk is the risk that the issuer of a financial instrument will fail to fulfil an obligation or commitment that it has entered into with the Company. The Company is exposed to counterparty credit risk from the parties with which it trades and will bear the risk of settlement default. Counterparty credit risk to the Company arises from transactions to purchase or sell investments and through its positions in long and short derivatives. The major counterparties engaged with the Company are all widely recognised and regulated entities. Notes to the Financial Statements continued

Section 4: Financial Statements 109 Depositary The Company’s Depositary is The Bank of New York Mellon (International) Limited (BNYM or the Depositary) (S&P long term credit rating as at 30 November 2022: AA- (2021: AA-)). The Company’s listed investments are held on its behalf by The Bank of New York Mellon (International) Limited (BNYM) as the Company’s custodian (as sub-delegated by the Depositary). All of the equity assets and cash of the Company are held within the custodial network of the global custodian appointed by the Depositary. Bankruptcy or insolvency of the Depositary/Custodian may cause the Company’s rights with respect to its investments held by the Depositary/Custodian to be delayed or limited. The maximum exposure to this risk at 30 November 2022 is the total value of equity investments held with the Depositary/Custodian and cash and cash equivalents in the Statement of Financial Position. In accordance with the requirements of the depositary agreement, the Depositary will ensure that any agents it appoints to assist in safekeeping the assets of the Company will segregate the assets of the Company. Thus, in the event of insolvency or bankruptcy of the Depositary, the Company’s non-cash assets are segregated and this reduces counterparty credit risk. The Company will, however, be exposed to the counterparty credit risk of the Depositary in relation to the Company’s cash held by the Depositary. In the event of the insolvency or bankruptcy of the Depositary, the Company will be treated as a general creditor of the Depositary in relation to cash holdings of the Company. The Board monitors the Company’s risk by reviewing the custodian’s internal control reports. Counterparties/brokers The Company only invests directly in markets that operate on a delivery versus payment basis, and consequently most investment transactions in listed securities involve simultaneous delivery of securities against cash payment using an approved broker. The risk of default is considered minimal, and the trade will fail if either party fails to meet its obligation. Cash held as security by a counterparty to financial derivative contracts is subject to the credit risk of the counterparty. The following table details the total number of counterparties to which the Company is exposed, the maximum exposure to any one counterparty, the collateral held by the Company against this exposure, the total exposure to all other counterparties and the lowest long term credit rating of any one counterparty (or its ultimate parent if unrated). Total number of counterparties Maximum exposure to any one counterparty 1 Collateral held 1 Total exposure to all other counterparties 1 Lowest credit rating of any one counterparty 2 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 2022 8 4,005 – 729 A- 2021 5 358 7,380 1,950 BBB+ 1 Calculated on a net exposure basis. 2 Standard & Poor’s ratings. The Company may also be exposed to counterparty risk should there be any rehypothecation of pledged collateral. Collateral is received/paid where the client service agreement states that there should be collateral movements agreed with the counterparty, where there is a requirement for a mark-to-market process or collateralisation to ensure that the Company is protected against any counterparty default. Collateral The Company engages in activities which may require collateral to be provided to a counterparty (pledged collateral) or may hold collateral received (inbound collateral) from a counterparty. Pledged and Inbound cash collateral is paid/received in Sterling. The Company uses inbound collateral received from a counterparty to reduce the counterparty credit risk associated with any trading activity in which the Company has engaged. The collateral received/posted by the Company under the ISDA Master Agreement in respect of variation margin is transferred bilaterally under a title transfer arrangement. Collateral received by the Company in respect of variation margin is held in an account in the name of the Depositary on behalf of the Company. Collateral received is segregated from the assets belonging to the Company’s Depositary.

110 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 16. Risk management policies and procedures continued At 30 November 2022, all cash collateral received by the Company in respect of CFD transactions was re-invested in the Cash Fund managed by the Manager or its affiliates as disclosed in the Schedule of Investments. The Company is the legal owner of inbound collateral and can sell the assets and withhold the cash in the case of default. All cash received or posted as collateral has an open maturity tenor as it is not subject to a contractual maturity date. The returns earned by the Company from the reinvestment of cash collateral in the Cash Fund during the year ended 30 November 2022 was 1.27% (2021: 0.10%). Cash collateral pledged by the Company is separately identified as an asset in the Statement of Financial Position and is not included as a component of cash and cash equivalents. Inbound cash collateral received by the Company is reflected as a liability on the Statement of Financial Position as cash collateral payable. The cash is subject to certain counterparty credit risk as the Company’s access to its cash could be delayed should the counterparties become insolvent or bankrupt. The fair value of inbound cash collateral and cash collateral pledged is reflected in the Statement of Financial Position and is set out in the table below: Pledged collateral Liability for inbound collateral As at 30 November 2022 As at 30 November 2021 As at 30 November 2022 As at 30 November 2021 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 Cash collateral – 7,380 (5,870) – Receivables Amounts due from brokers are disclosed on the Statement of Financial Position as receivables. The counterparties included in receivables are the same counterparties discussed previously under counterparty credit risk and subject to the same scrutiny by the BlackRock RQA Counterparty and Concentration Risk Team (RQA CCR). The Company monitors the ageing of receivables to mitigate the risk of debtor balances becoming overdue. In summary, the exposure to credit risk at 30 November 2022 and 30 November 2021 was as follows: 2022 3 months or less 2021 3 months or less £’000 £’000 Derivative positions – amounts due from brokers 4,800 – Cash Fund 58,690 25,080 Cash collateral held with brokers – 7,380 Cash at bank 103 143 Amounts due from brokers 2,033 1,035 Share issue receivable – 1,130 65,626 34,768 The following table details the Company’s exposure to derivatives and net cash collateral (received/pledged in Sterling) analysed by counterparty as at the balance sheet date: 2022 Name of counterparty Counterparty country of incorporation Receivable/ (payable) for derivatives Cash collateral pledged/ (received) £’000 £’000 JPMorgan United States 4,577 (4,160) Société Générale France 223 (580) BNP Paribas France (2,202) (1,130) 2,598 (5,870) Notes to the Financial Statements continued

Section 4: Financial Statements 111 2021 Name of counterparty Counterparty country of incorporation Receivable/ (payable) for derivatives Cash collateral pledged/ (received) £’000 £’000 Deutsche Bank AG Germany – 270 BNP Paribas France (163) – JPMorgan United States (3,762) 2,250 Credit Suisse Switzerland (4,791) 4,860 (8,716) 7,380 Management of counterparty credit risk Credit risk is monitored and managed by RQA CCR. The team is headed by BlackRock’s Chief Credit Officer who reports to the Global Head of RQA. Credit authority resides with the Chief Credit Officer and selected team members to whom specific credit authority has been delegated. As such, counterparty approvals may be granted by the Chief Credit Officer, or by identified RQA Credit Risk Officers who have been formally delegated authority by the Chief Credit Officer. The counterparty/credit risk is managed as follows: • transactions are only entered into with those counterparties approved by RQA CCR, with a formal review carried out for each new counterparty and with counterparties selected by RQA CCR on the basis of a number of risk mitigation criteria designed to reduce the risk to the Company of default; • the creditworthiness of financial institutions with whom cash is held is reviewed regularly by the RQA CCR team; and • the RQA CCR team reviews the credit standard of the Company’s brokers on a periodic basis and set limits on the amount that may be due from any one broker. The Board monitors the Company’s counterparty risk by reviewing: • the semi-annual report from the Depositary, which includes the results of periodic site visits to the Company’s custodian where controls are reviewed and tested; • the custodian’s Service Organisation Control (SOC 1) reports which include a report by the custodian’s auditors. This report sets out any exceptions or issues noted as a result of the auditor’s review of the custodian’s processes; • the Manager’s internal control reports which include a report by the Manager’s auditors. This report sets out any exceptions or issues noted as a result of the auditor’s review of the Manager’s control processes; and • in addition, the Depositary and the Manager report any significant breaches or issues arising to the Board as soon as these are identified. There were no past due assets as at 30 November 2022 (2021: nil). Offsetting disclosures In order to better define its contractual rights and to secure rights that will help the Company mitigate its counterparty risk, the Company may enter into an ISDA Master Agreement or similar agreement with its OTC derivative contract counterparties. An ISDA Master Agreement is an agreement between the Company and the counterparty that governs OTC derivative contracts and typically contains, among other things, collateral posting terms and netting provisions in the event of a default and/or termination event. Under an ISDA Master Agreement, the Company has a contractual right to offset with the counterparty certain derivative financial instruments payables and/or receivables with collateral held and/or posted and create one single net payment in the event of default including the bankruptcy or insolvency of the counterparty. However, bankruptcy or insolvency laws of a particular jurisdiction may impose restrictions on or prohibitions against the right of offset in bankruptcy, insolvency or other events. For financial reporting purposes, the Company does offset derivative assets and derivative liabilities that are subject to netting arrangements in the Statement of Financial Position. The disclosures set out in the following table include financial assets and financial liabilities that are subject to an enforceable master netting agreement or similar agreement.

112 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 16. Risk management policies and procedures continued At 30 November 2022 and 2021, the Company’s derivative assets and liabilities (by type) are as follows: At 30 November 2022 At 30 November 2021 Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 Derivatives Long derivative positions 5,422 (2,692) 2,106 (11,682) Short derivative positions 490 (622) 1,333 (473) Total derivative assets and liabilities in the Statement of Financial Position 5,912 (3,314) 3,439 (12,155) Derivatives not subject to a master netting agreement – – – – Total assets and liabilities subject to a master netting agreement 5,912 (3,314) 3,439 (12,155) The following table presents the Company’s derivative assets and liabilities by counterparty, net of amounts available for offset, under a master netting agreement and net of any related collateral paid/(received) by the Company at 30 November 2022 and 30 November 2021: Derivative assets/ (liabilities) subject to a master netting agreement by a counterparty Derivatives available for offset Net amount as per statement of financial position Non-cash collateral given Cash collateral Net amount of derivative assets/ (liabilities) 1 Counterparty £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 At 30 November 2022 JPMorgan 5,537 (960) 4,577 – (4,160) 417 Société Générale 288 (65) 223 – (223) – BNP Paribas 87 (2,289) (2,202) – (1,130) (3,332) Total as at 30 November 2022 5,912 (3,314) 2,598 – (5,513) (2,915) At 30 November 2021 BNP Paribas 187 (350) (163) – – (163) Credit Suisse 203 (4,994) (4,791) – 4,791 – JPMorgan 3,049 (6,811) (3,762) – 2,250 (1,512) Total as at 30 November 2021 3,439 (12,155) (8,716) – 7,041 (1,675) 1 Amount represents the net amount receivable/(payable) from/(to) the counterparty in the event of default, and does not include over- collateralised positions. (c) Liquidity risk Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will encounter difficulties in meeting obligations associated with financial liabilities. The Company is also exposed to the liquidity risk for margin calls on derivative instruments. At the year end, the Company had no overdraft facility (2021: nil). Notes to the Financial Statements continued

Section 4: Financial Statements 113 Liquidity risk exposure The remaining undiscounted gross cash flows of the financial liabilities as at 30 November 2022 and 30 November 2021, which are payable in the next 90 days, were as follows: 2022 3 months or less 2021 3 months or less £’000 £’000 Amounts due to brokers, accruals and provisions 2,240 13,008 Derivative financial liabilities held at fair value through profit or loss 2,202 8,716 Cash collateral received in respect of derivatives 5,870 – 10,312 21,724 Management of liquidity risk Liquidity risk is minimised by holding sufficient liquid investments which can be readily realised to meet liquidity demands. Asset disposals may also be required to meet liquidity needs. However, the timely sale of trading positions can be impaired by many factors including decreased trading volume and increased price volatility. As a result, the Company may experience difficulties in disposing of assets to satisfy liquidity demands. Liquidity risk is not significant as the Company’s assets are investments in listed securities that are readily realisable. The Company is also exposed to liquidity risks from the leverage employed through exposure to long and short derivative positions. The underlying securities of the CFD contracts are all quoted investments that can be realised readily. Short derivative positions are backed by sufficient margin cash to reduce risk. Additional cash is held within the portfolio to further mitigate risk. The Company’s liquidity risk is managed on a daily basis by the Investment Manager in accordance with established policies and procedures in place. The Investment Manager reviews daily forward-looking cash reports which project cash obligations. These reports allow them to manage their obligations. For the avoidance of doubt, none of the assets of the Company are subject to special liquidity arrangements. (d) Valuation of financial instruments Financial assets and financial liabilities are either carried in the Statement of Financial Position at their fair value (investments and derivatives) or at an amount which is a reasonable approximation of fair value (due from brokers, dividends and interest receivable, due to brokers, accruals, cash at bank and bank overdrafts). IFRS 13 requires the Company to classify fair value measurements using a fair value hierarchy that reflects the significance of inputs used in making the measurements. The valuation techniques used by the Company are explained in the accounting policies note 2(g) to the Financial Statements on pages 93 and 94. Categorisation within the hierarchy has been determined on the basis of the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the relevant asset or liability. The fair value hierarchy has the following levels: Level 1 – Quoted market price for identical instruments in active markets A financial instrument is regarded as quoted in an active market if quoted prices are readily and regularly available from an exchange, dealer, broker, industry group, pricing service or regulatory agency and those prices represent actual and regularly occurring market transactions on an arm’s length basis. The Company does not adjust the quoted price for these instruments.

114 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 16. Risk management policies and procedures continued Level 2 – Valuation techniques using observable inputs This category includes instruments valued using quoted prices for similar instruments in markets that are considered less than active, or other valuation techniques where all significant inputs are directly or indirectly observable from market data. Valuation techniques used for non-standardised financial instruments such as options, currency swaps and other over-the- counter derivatives include the use of comparable recent arm’s length transactions, reference to other instruments that are substantially the same, discounted cash flow analysis, option pricing models and other valuation techniques commonly used by market participants making the maximum use of market inputs and relying as little as possible on entity specific inputs. As at the year end the long and short derivative positions were valued using the underlying equity bid price (offer price in respect of short positions) and the contract price at the inception of the trade or at the trade reset date. There have been no changes to the valuation technique since the previous year or as at the date of this report. Contracts for difference have been classified as Level 2 investments as their valuation has been based on market observable inputs represented by the market prices of the underlying quoted securities to which these contracts expose the Company. Level 3 – Valuation techniques using significant unobservable inputs This category includes all instruments where the valuation technique includes inputs not based on market data and these inputs could have a significant impact on the instrument’s valuation. This category also includes instruments that are valued based on quoted prices for similar instruments where significant entity determined adjustments or assumptions are required to reflect differences between the instruments and instruments for which there is no active market. The Investment Manager considers observable data to be that market data that is readily available, regularly distributed or updated, reliable and verifiable, not proprietary, and provided by independent sources that are actively involved in the relevant market. The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement is categorised in its entirety is determined on the basis of the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. If a fair value measurement uses observable inputs that require significant adjustment based on unobservable inputs, that measurement is a Level 3 measurement. Assessing the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgement, considering factors specific to the asset or liability. The determination of what constitutes ‘observable’ inputs requires significant judgement by the Investment Manager. Fair values of financial assets and financial liabilities The table below sets out fair value measurements using the IFRS 13 fair value hierarchy. Financial assets/(liabilities) at fair value through profit or loss at 30 November 2022 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 Assets: Equity investments 576,771 – – 576,771 Contracts for difference (fair value) – 4,800 – 4,800 Liabilities: Contracts for difference (fair value) – (2,202) – (2,202) 576,771 2,598 – 579,369 Financial assets/(liabilities) at fair value through profit or loss at 30 November 2021 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 Assets: Equity investments 921,204 – – 921,204 Contracts for difference (fair value) – – – – Liabilities: Contracts for difference (fair value) – (8,716) – (8,716) 921,204 (8,716) – 912,488 Notes to the Financial Statements continued

Section 4: Financial Statements 115 There were no transfers between levels for financial assets and financial liabilities during the year recorded at fair value as at 30 November 2022 and 30 November 2021. The Company did not hold any Level 3 securities throughout the financial year or as at 30 November 2022 (2021: nil). For exchange listed equity investments, the quoted price is the bid price. Contracts for difference are valued based on the bid price of the underlying quoted securities that the contracts relate to. Substantially, all investments are valued based on unadjusted quoted market prices. Where such quoted prices are readily available in an active market, such prices are not required to be assessed or adjusted for any business risks, including climate change risk, in accordance with the fair value related requirements of the Company’s financial reporting framework. (e) Capital management policies and procedures The Company’s capital management objectives are: • to ensure it will be able to continue as a going concern; and • secure long term capital growth and an attractive total return primarily through investing in quoted securities in the UK, as well as through investment in a portfolio of long and short derivative positions and/or comparable equity derivatives. This is to be achieved through an appropriate balance of equity capital, investment in derivatives, and gearing. The policy is that any leverage arising through the Company’s derivative contracts, should not exceed 30% of net assets. Additionally net gearing (borrowing less cash) should not exceed 20% of net assets. The Company’s total capital at 30 November 2022 was £633,357,000 (2021: £935,148,000), comprising capital and reserves. The Board with the assistance of the Investment Manager monitors and reviews the broad structure of the Company’s capital on an ongoing basis. This review includes: • the planned level of gearing, which takes into account the Investment Manager’s view on the market; and • the need to buy back equity shares, either for cancellation or to be held in treasury, which takes account of the difference between the NAV per share and the share price (i.e. the level of share price discount or premium). The Company is subject to externally imposed capital requirements: • as a public company, the Company has a minimum share capital of £50,000; and • in order to be able to pay dividends out of profits available for distribution, the Company has to be able to meet one of the two capital restrictions tests imposed on investment companies by law. During the year, the Company complied with the externally imposed capital requirements to which it was subject.

116 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 17. Related party disclosure Directors’ emoluments At the date of this report, the Board consists of seven Non-executive Directors, all of whom are considered to be independent of the Manager by the Board. Disclosures of the Directors’ interests in the ordinary shares of the Company and fees and expenses payable to the Directors are set out in the Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 69 to 72. At 30 November 2022 £17,000 (2021: £15,000) was outstanding in respect of Directors’ fees. Significant Holdings The following investors are: a. funds managed by the BlackRock Group or are affiliates of BlackRock Inc. (Related BlackRock Funds) or b. investors (other than those listed in (a) above) who held more than 20% of the voting shares in issue in the Company and are as a result, considered to be related parties to the Company (Significant Investors). As at 30 November 2022 Total % of shares held by Related BlackRock Funds Total % of shares held by Significant Investors who are not affiliates of BlackRock Group or BlackRock, Inc. Number of Significant Investors who are not affiliates of BlackRock Group or BlackRock, Inc. 1.84 n/a n/a As at 30 November 2021 Total % of shares held by Related BlackRock Funds Total % of shares held by Significant Investors who are not affiliates of BlackRock Group or BlackRock, Inc. Number of Significant Investors who are not affiliates of BlackRock Group or BlackRock, Inc. 1.78 n/a n/a 18. Transactions with the Investment Manager and AIFM BlackRock Fund Managers Limited (BFM) provides management and administration services to the Company under a contract which is terminable on six months’ notice. BFM has (with the Company’s consent) delegated certain portfolio and risk management services, and other ancillary services, to BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited (BIM (UK)). Further details of the investment management contract are disclosed in the Directors’ Report on pages 54 and 55. The investment management fee due for the year ended 30 November 2022 amounted to £3,025,000 (2021: £3,652,000). In addition, there was no performance fee (2021: £6,655,000) payable for the year. At the year end, £1,272,000 was outstanding in respect of management fees (2021: £2,923,000) and £nil (2021: £6,655,000) outstanding in respect of performance fees. In addition to the above services, BIM (UK) has provided marketing services. The total fees paid or payable for these services for the year ended 30 November 2022 amounted to £153,000 excluding VAT (2021: £157,000). Marketing fees of £120,000 (2021: £120,000) were outstanding at the year end. The Company has an investment in the BlackRock Institutional Cash Series plc - Sterling Liquid Environmentally Aware Fund of £58,690,000 (2021: £25,080,000) which for the year ended 30 November 2022 and 30 November 2021 has been presented in the financial statements as a cash equivalent. The ultimate holding company of the Manager and the Investment Manager is BlackRock, Inc., a company incorporated in Delaware USA. 19. Contingent liabilities There were no contingent liabilities at 30 November 2022 (2021: nil). Notes to the Financial Statements continued

Section 5: Additional information 119 Additional information We also increased our holding in veterinary services provider CVS Group. The company continues to integrate quality practices to its network of over 500 veterinary surgeries.

120 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 Financial calendar The timing of the announcement and publication of the Company’s results may normally be expected in the months shown below: February Annual results announced and Annual Report and Financial Statements published. March Annual General Meeting. April Final dividend paid. July Interim figures announced and half yearly financial report published. August Interim dividend paid. Dividend The proposed final dividend in respect of the year ended 30 November 2022 is 8.50 pence per share. The Board also declared an interim dividend of 2.6 pence per share which was paid on 26 August 2022 to shareholders on the register on 29 July 2022. Dividend timetable Ordinary shares Ex-dividend date (shares transferred without the dividend) 23 February 2023 Record date (last date for registering transfers to receive the dividend) 24 February 2023 Dividend payment date 31 March 2023 Payment of dividends Cash dividends will be sent by cheque to the first-named shareholder at their registered address. Dividends may also be paid direct into a shareholder’s bank account via BACSTEL-IP (Bankers’ Automated Clearing Service – Telecom Internet Protocol). This may be arranged by contacting the Company’s registrar, Computershare Investor Services PLC, through their secure website investorcentre.co.uk, on 0370 707 4016 or by completing the Mandate Instructions section on the reverse of your dividend counterfoil and sending this to the Company’s registrar, Computershare. Dividend confirmations will be sent to shareholders at their registered address, unless other instructions have been given, to arrive on the payment date. Dividend tax allowance The annual tax-free allowance on dividend income across an individual’s entire share portfolio is currently £2,000, reducing to £1,000 from 6 April 2023 and then £500 from 6 April 2024. Above this amount, individuals pay tax on their dividend income at a rate dependent on their income tax bracket and personal circumstances. The Company continues to provide registered shareholders with confirmation of the dividends paid and this should be included with any other dividend income received when calculating and reporting total dividend income received. It is a shareholder’s responsibility to include all dividend income when calculating any tax liability. If you have any tax queries, please contact a financial advisor. Dividend reinvestment plan (DRIP) Shareholders may request that their dividends be used to purchase further shares in the Company. Dividend reinvestment forms may be obtained from Computershare Investor Services PLC, through their secure website investorcentre.co.uk, or on 0370 707 4016. Shareholders who have already opted to have their dividends reinvested do not need to reapply. The last date for registering for this service for the forthcoming dividend is 10 March 2022. Share price The Company’s mid-market ordinary share price is quoted daily in The Financial Times and The Times under ‘Investment Companies’ and in The Daily Telegraph under ‘Investment Trusts’. The share price is also available on the BlackRock website at blackrock.com/uk/thrg. ISIN/SEDOL numbers The ISIN/SEDOL numbers and mnemonic codes for the Company’s shares are: Ordinary shares ISIN GB0008910555 SEDOL 0891055 Reuters THRG.L Bloomberg code THRG:LN Share dealing Investors wishing to purchase more shares in the Company or sell all or part of their existing holding may do so through a stockbroker. Most banks also offer this service. Alternatively, please go to http://www.computershare.com/ dealing/uk for a range of dealing services made available by Computershare. Internet dealing – The fee for this service is 1% of the value of the transaction (subject to a minimum of £30). Telephone dealing – The fee for this service will be 1% of the value of the transaction (plus £50). Electronic communications We encourage you to play your part in reducing our impact on the environment and elect to be notified by email when your shareholder communications become available online. This means you will receive timely, cost-effective and greener online annual reports, half yearly financial reports and other relevant documentation. Shareholders who opt for this service will receive an e-mail from Computershare with a link to the relevant section of the BlackRock website where the documents can be viewed and downloaded. Please submit your email address by visiting investorcentre. co.uk/ecomms (you will need your shareholder reference number, which is given on your share certificate or dividend confirmation). Shareholder information

Section 5: Additional information 121 You will continue to receive a printed copy of these reports if you have elected to do so. Alternatively, if you have not submitted your email address nor have elected to receive printed reports, we will write and let you know where you can view these reports online. Electronic proxy voting Shareholders are able to submit their proxy votes electronically via Computershare’s internet site at eproxyappointment.com using a unique identification PIN which will be provided with voting instructions and the Notice of Annual General Meeting. CREST members who wish to appoint one or more proxies or give an instruction through the CREST electronic proxy appointment service may do so by using the procedures described in the CREST manual. More details are set out in the notes on the Form of Proxy and the Notice of Annual General Meeting. CREST The Company’s shares may be held in CREST, an electronic system for uncertificated securities trading. Private investors can continue to retain their share certificates and remain outside the CREST system. Private investors are able to buy and sell their holdings in the same way as they did prior to the introduction of CREST, although there may be differences in dealing charges. Nominee code Where shares are held in a nominee company name, the Company undertakes: • to provide the nominee company with multiple copies of shareholder communications, so long as an indication of quantities has been provided in advance; and • to allow investors holding shares through a nominee company to attend general meetings, provided the correct authority from the nominee company is available. Nominee companies are encouraged to provide the necessary authority to underlying shareholders to attend the Company’s general meetings. Publication of net asset value/portfolio analysis The NAV per share of the Company is calculated daily, with details of the Company’s investments and performance being published monthly. The daily NAV and monthly information are released through the London Stock Exchange’s Regulatory News Service and are available on the BlackRock website at blackrock.com/uk/ thrg and through the Reuters News Service under the code ‘BLRKINDEX’, on page 8800 on Topic 3 (ICV terminals) and under ‘BLRK’ on Bloomberg (monthly information only). Online access Other details about the Company are also available on the BlackRock website at blackrock.com/uk/thrg. The Financial Statements and other literature are published on the BlackRock website. Visitors to the website need to be aware that legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of the Financial Statements may differ from legislation in their jurisdiction. Shareholders can also manage their shareholding online by using Investor Centre, Computershare’s secure website, at investorcentre.co.uk. To access Computershare’s website, you will need your shareholder reference number (SRN) which can be found on paper or electronic communications you have previously received from Computershare. Shareholders who hold a share certificate which has been issued by Capita Registrars should insert a ‘C’ before the shareholder reference number quoted on the certificate. Listed below are the most frequently used features of the website. • Holding enquiry – view balances, values, history, payments and reinvestments. • Payments enquiry – view your dividends and other payment types. • Address change – change your registered address. • Bank details update – choose to receive your dividend payment directly into your bank account instead of by cheque. • e-Comms sign-up – choose to receive e-mail notification when your shareholder communications become available instead of paper communications. • Outstanding payments – reissue payments using the online replacement service. • Downloadable forms – including dividend mandates, stock transfer, dividend reinvestment and change of address forms. Individual savings accounts (ISAs) ISAs are a tax-efficient method of investment in the UK and the Company’s shares are eligible investments within a stocks and shares ISA. In the 2021/2022 tax year, investors will be able to invest up to £20,000 in ISAs either as cash or shares.

122 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 Shareholder enquiries The Company’s registrar is Computershare Investor Services PLC. Certain details relating to your holding can be checked through the Computershare Investor Centre website. As a security check, specific information needs to be input accurately to gain access to an individual’s account. This includes the shareholder reference number, available from either the share certificate, form of proxy or dividend confirmation or other electronic communications previously received from Computershare. Shareholders who hold a share certificate which has been issued by Capita Registrars should insert a ‘C’ before the shareholder reference number quoted on the certificate. The address of the Computershare website is investorcentre. co.uk. Alternatively, please contact the registrar on 0370 707 4016. Changes of name or address must be notified to the registrar either through Computershare’s website, or in writing to: Computershare Investor Services PLC The Pavilions Bridgwater Road Bristol BS99 6ZZ General enquiries Enquiries about the Company should be directed to: The Company Secretary BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc 12 Throgmorton Avenue London EC2N 2DL Telephone: 020 7743 3000 Email: cosec@blackrock.com Shareholder information continued

Section 5: Additional information 123 Analysis of ordinary shareholders as at 30 November 2022 By type of holder Number of shares 2022 Number of shares 2021* % of total 2022 % of total 2021 Individuals 3,584,913 3,702,685 5.54 3.65 Bank or Nominees 97,015,227 96,459,885 93.35 95.21 Other 558,724 1,153,294 1.11 1.14 Total 101,158,864 101,315,864 100.00 100.00 Excludes 2,051,000 treasury shares held as at 30 November 2022. Number of holders 2022 Number of holders 2021 % of total 2022 % of total 2021 Individuals 766 794 59.59 53.07 Bank or Nominees 366 660 37.46 44.12 Other 44 42 2.95 2.81 Total 1,176 1,496 100.00 100.00 By size of holding Number of shares 2022 Number of shares 2021* % of total 2022 % of total 2021 1 – 10,000 2,572,450 3,195,429 2.54 3.15 10,001 – 100,000 5,956,406 6,936,663 5.89 6.85 100,001 – 1,000,000 24,673,468 25,962,292 24.39 25.63 1,000,001 – 5,000,000 46,866,431 44,614,438 46.33 44.03 Over 5,000,000 21,090,109 20,607,042 20.85 20.34 Total 101,158,864 101,315,864 100.00 100.00 Excludes 2,051,000 treasury shares held as at 30 November 2022. Number of holders 2022 Number of holders 2021 % of total 2022 % of total 2021 1 – 10,000 887 1,174 75.42 78.47 10,001 – 100,000 193 223 16.41 14.91 100,001 – 1,000,000 75 77 6.38 5.15 1,000,001 – 5,000,000 18 19 1.62 1.27 Over 5,000,000 3 3 0.26 0.20 Total 1,176 1,496 100.00 100.00 * Excludes unsettled share issuance trades of 120,100 shares as at 30 November 2021.

124 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 Registered Office (Registered in England and Wales, No. 00594634) 12 Throgmorton Avenue London EC2N 2DL Investment Manager and Company Secretary BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited 1 12 Throgmorton Avenue London EC2N 2DL Email: cosec@blackrock.com Alternative Investment Fund Manager 2 BlackRock Fund Managers Limited 1 12 Throgmorton Avenue London EC2N 2DL Telephone: 020 7743 3000 Banker, Custodian and Depositary The Bank of New York Mellon (International) Limited 1 160 Queen Victoria Street London EC4V 4LA Registrar Computershare Investor Services PLC 1 The Pavilions Bridgwater Road Bristol BS99 6ZZ Telephone: 0370 707 4016 Independent Auditor PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Atria One 144 Morrison Street Edinburgh EH3 8EX Stockbroker Stifel Nicolaus Europe Limited 1 150 Cheapside London EC2V 6ET Solicitor Stephenson Harwood LLP 1 Finsbury Circus London, EC2M 7SH Management and other service providers 1 Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. 2 BlackRock Fund Managers Limited (BFM) was appointed as the Alternative Investment Fund Manager on 2 July 2014. BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited continues to act as the Investment Manager of the Company under a delegation agreement with BFM.

Section 5: Additional information 125 The below disclosures are made in respect of the remuneration policies of the BlackRock group (“BlackRock”), as they apply to BlackRock Fund Managers Limited (the “Manager”). The disclosures are made in accordance with the provisions in the UK implementing the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (the “AIFMD”), the European Commission Delegated Regulation supplementing the AIFMD (the “Delegated Regulation”) and the “Guidelines on sound remuneration policies under the AIFMD” issued by the European Securities and Markets Authority. The BlackRock AIFM Remuneration Policy (the “AIFM Remuneration Policy”) will apply to the EEA entities within the BlackRock group authorised as a manager of alternative investment funds in accordance with the AIFMD and will ensure compliance with the requirements of Annex II of the AIFMD and to UK entities within the BlackRock group authorised as a manager of a UK alternative investment fund in accordance with the AIFMD as implemented, retained and onshored in the UK. The Manager has adopted the AIFM Remuneration Policy, a summary of which is set out below. Remuneration Governance BlackRock’s remuneration governance in EMEA operates as a tiered structure which includes: (a) the Management Development and Compensation Committee (“MDCC”) (which is the global, independent remuneration committee for BlackRock, Inc. and (b) the Manager’s board of directors (the “Manager’s Board”). These bodies are responsible for the determination of BlackRock’s remuneration policies. (a) MDCC The MDCC’s purposes include: • providing oversight of: – BlackRock’s executive compensation programmes; – BlackRock’s employee benefit plans; and – such other compensation plans as may be established by BlackRock from time to time for which the MDCC is deemed as administrator; • reviewing and discussing the compensation discussion and analysis included in the BlackRock, Inc. annual proxy statement with management and approving the MDCC’s report for inclusion in the proxy statement; • reviewing, assessing and making reports and recommendations to the BlackRock, Inc. Board of Directors (the ‘BlackRock, Inc. Board’) as appropriate on BlackRock’s talent development and succession planning, with the emphasis on performance and succession at the highest management levels; and • supporting the boards of the Company’s EMEA regulated entities in meeting their remuneration-related obligations by overseeing the design and implementation of EMEA remuneration policy in accordance with applicable regulations. The MDCC directly retains its own independent compensation consultant, Semler Brossy Consulting Group LLC, who has no relationship with BlackRock Inc. or the BlackRock, Inc. Board that would interfere with its ability to provide independent advice to the MDCC on compensation matters. The BlackRock, Inc. Board has determined that all of the members of the MDCC are “independent” within the meaning of the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), which requires each meet a “non-employee director” standard. The MDCC held 8 meetings during 2021. The MDCC charter is available on BlackRock, Inc.’s website (www.blackrock.com). (b) The Manager’s Board The Manager’s Board has the task of supervising and providing oversight of the AIFM Remuneration Policy as it applies to the Manager and its Identified Staff. Decision-making process Remuneration decisions for employees are made once annually in January following the end of the performance year. This timing allows full-year financial results to be considered along with other non-financial goals and objectives. Although the framework for remuneration decision-making is tied to financial performance, significant discretion is used to determine individual variable remuneration based on achievement of strategic and operating results and other considerations such as management and leadership capabilities. No set formulas are established and no fixed benchmarks are used in determining annual incentive awards. In determining specific individual remuneration amounts, a number of factors are considered including non-financial goals and objectives and overall financial and investment performance. These results are viewed in the aggregate without any specific weighting, and there is no direct correlation between any particular performance measure and the resulting annual incentive award. The variable remuneration awarded to any individual(s) for a particular performance year may also be zero. Annual incentive awards are paid from a bonus pool. The size of the projected bonus pool, including cash and equity awards, is reviewed throughout the year by the MDCC and the final total bonus pool is approved after year-end. As part of this review, the MDCC receives actual and projected financial information over the course of the year as well as final year-end information. The financial information that the MDCC receives and considers includes the current year projected income statement and other financial measures AIFM report on remuneration (unaudited)

126 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 compared with prior year results and the current year budget. The MDCC additionally reviews other metrics of BlackRock’s financial performance (e.g., net inflows of AUM and investment performance) as well as information regarding market conditions and competitive compensation levels. The MDCC regularly considers management’s recommendation as to the percentage of preincentive operating income that will be accrued and reflected as a compensation expense throughout the year for the cash portion of the total annual bonus pool (the “accrual rate”). The accrual rate of the cash portion of the total annual bonus pool may be modified by the MDCC during the year based on its review of the financial information described above. The MDCC does not apply any particular weighting or formula to the information it considers when determining the size of the total bonus pool or the accruals made for the cash portion of the total bonus pool. Following the end of the performance year, the MDCC approves the final bonus pool amount. As part of the year-end review process the Enterprise Risk and Regulatory Compliance departments report to the MDCC on any activities, incidents or events that warrant consideration in making compensation decisions. Individuals are not involved in setting their own remuneration. Control functions Each of the control functions (Enterprise Risk, Legal & Compliance, and Internal Audit) has its own organisational structure which is independent of the business units. The head of each control function is either a member of the Global Executive Committee (“GEC”), the global management committee, or has a reporting obligation to the board of directors of BlackRock Group Limited, the parent company of all of BlackRock’s EMEA regulated entities, including the Manager. Functional bonus pools are determined with reference to the performance of each individual function. The remuneration of the senior members of control functions is directly overseen by the MDCC. Link between pay and performance There is a clear and well defined pay-for-performance philosophy and compensation programmes which are designed to meet the following key objectives as detailed below: • appropriately balance BlackRock’s financial results between shareholders and employees; • attract, retain and motivate employees capable of making significant contributions to the long term success of the business; • align the interests of senior employees with those of shareholders by awarding BlackRock Inc.’s stock as a significant part of both annual and long term incentive awards; • control fixed costs by ensuring that compensation expense varies with profitability; • link a significant portion of an employee’s total compensation to the financial and operational performance of the business; • promote sound and effective risk management across all risk categories, including sustainability risk; • discourage excessive risk-taking (sustainability related or otherwise); and • ensure that client interests are not negatively impacted by remuneration awarded on a short term, mid term and/or long term basis. Driving a high-performance culture is dependent on the ability to measure performance against objectives, values and behaviours in a clear and consistent way. Managers use a 5-point rating scale to provide an overall assessment of an employee’s performance, and employees also provide a self- evaluation. The overall, final rating is reconciled during each employee’s performance appraisal. Employees are assessed on the manner in which performance is attained as well as the absolute performance itself. In keeping with the pay-for-performance philosophy, ratings are used to differentiate and reward individual performance – but don’t pre-determine compensation outcomes. Compensation decisions remain discretionary and are made as part of the year-end compensation process. When setting remuneration levels other factors are considered, as well as individual performance, which may include: • the performance of the Manager, the funds managed by the Manager and/or the relevant functional department; • factors relevant to an employee individually; relationships with clients and colleagues; teamwork; skills; any conduct issues; and, subject to any applicable policy, the impact that any relevant leave of absence may have on contribution to the business); • the management of risk within the risk profiles appropriate for BlackRock’s clients; • strategic business needs, including intentions regarding retention; • market intelligence; and • criticality to business. AIFM report on remuneration (unaudited) continued

Section 5: Additional information 127 A primary product tool is risk management and, while employees are compensated for strong performance in their management of client assets, they are required to manage risk within the risk profiles appropriate for their clients. Therefore, employees are not rewarded for engaging in high-risk transactions outside of established parameters. Remuneration practices do not provide undue incentives for short term planning or short term financial rewards, do not reward unreasonable risk and provide a reasonable balance between the many and substantial risks inherent within the business of investment management, risk management and advisory services. BlackRock operates a total compensation model for remuneration which includes a base salary, which is contractual, and a discretionary bonus scheme. BlackRock operates an annual discretionary bonus scheme. Although all employees are eligible to be considered for a discretionary bonus, there is no contractual obligation to make any award to an employee under its discretionary bonus scheme. In exercising discretion to award a discretionary bonus, the factors listed above (under the heading “Link between pay and performance”) may be taken into account in addition to any other matters which become relevant to the exercise of discretion in the course of the performance year. Discretionary bonus awards for all employees, including executive officers, are subject to a guideline that determines the portion paid in cash and the portion paid in BlackRock, Inc. stock and subject to additional vesting/clawback conditions. Stock awards are subject to further performance adjustment through variation in BlackRock, Inc.’s share price over the vesting period. As total annual compensation increases, a greater portion is deferred into stock. The MDCC adopted this approach in 2006 to substantially increase the retention value and shareholder alignment of the compensation package for eligible employees, including the executive officers. The portion deferred into stock vests into three equal instalments over the three years following grant. Supplementary to the annual discretionary bonus as described above, equity awards may be made to select individuals to provide greater linkage with future business results. These long term incentive awards have been established individually to provide meaningful incentive for continued performance over a multi-year period recognising the scope of the individual’s role, business expertise and leadership skills. Selected senior leaders are eligible to receive performance- adjusted equity-based awards from the “BlackRock Performance Incentive Plan” (“BPIP”). Awards made from the BPIP have a three-year performance period based on a measurement of As Adjusted Operating Margin 1 and Organic Revenue Growth 2 . Determination of pay-out will be made based on the firm’s achievement relative to target financial results at the conclusion of the performance period. The maximum number of shares that can be earned is 165% of the award in those situations where both metrics achieve pre-determined financial targets. No shares will be earned where the firm’s financial performance in both of the above metrics is below a pre-determined performance threshold. These metrics have been selected as key measures of shareholder value which endure across market cycles. A limited number of investment professionals have a portion of their annual discretionary bonus (as described above) awarded as deferred cash that notionally tracks investment in selected products managed by the employee. The intention of these awards is to align investment professionals with the investment returns of the products they manage through the deferral of compensation into those products. Clients and external evaluators have increasingly viewed more favourably those products where key investors have “skin in the game” through significant personal investments. Identified Staff The AIFM Remuneration Policy sets out the process that will be applied to identify staff as Identified Staff, being categories of staff of the Manager, including senior management, risk takers, control functions and any employee receiving total remuneration that takes them into the same remuneration bracket as senior management and risk takers, whose professional activities have a material impact on the risk profiles of the Manager or of the funds it manages. The list of Identified Staff will be subject to regular review, being formally reviewed in the event of, but not limited to: • organisational changes; • new business initiatives; • changes in significant influence function lists; • changes in role responsibilities; and • revised regulatory direction. Quantitative Remuneration Disclosure The Manager is required to make quantitative disclosures of remuneration in accordance with the AIFMD, the Delegated Regulation and the FCA FUND Handbook. These disclosures are made in line with BlackRock’s interpretation of currently available regulatory guidance on quantitative remuneration disclosures. As market or regulatory practice develops BlackRock may consider it appropriate to make changes to 1 As Adjusted Operating Margin: As reported in BlackRock’s external filings, reflects adjusted Operating Income divided by Total Revenue net of distribution and servicing expenses and amortisation of deferred sales commissions. 2 Organic Revenue Growth: Equal to net new base fees plus net new Aladdin revenue generated in the year (in US Dollars).

128 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 the way in which quantitative remuneration disclosures are calculated. Where such changes are made, this may result in disclosures in relation to a fund not being comparable to the disclosures made in the prior year, or in relation to other BlackRock fund disclosures in that same year. Disclosures are provided in relation to (a) the staff of the Manager; (b) staff who are senior management; and (c) staff who have the ability to materially affect the risk profile of the Fund, including individuals who, although not directly employed by the Manager, are assigned by their employer to carry out services directly for the Manager. All individuals included in the aggregated figures disclosed are rewarded in line with BlackRock’s remuneration policy for their responsibilities across the relevant BlackRock business area. As all individuals have a number of areas of responsibilities, only the portion of remuneration for those individuals’ services attributable to the Fund is included in the aggregate figures disclosed. Members of staff and senior management of the Manager typically provide both AIFMD and non-AIFMD related services in respect of multiple funds, clients and functions of the Manager and across the broader BlackRock group. Therefore, the figures disclosed are a sum of each individual’s portion of remuneration attributable to the Manager according to an objective apportionment methodology which acknowledges the multiple-service nature of the Manager. Accordingly the figures are not representative of any individual’s actual remuneration or their remuneration structure. The amount of the total remuneration awarded by the Manager to its staff which has been attributed to the Manager’s AIFMD-related business in respect of the Manager’s financial year ending 31 December 2021 is US$105.4 million. This figure is comprised of fixed remuneration of GBP£1.6 million and variable remuneration of GBP£78.1 million. There were a total of 67 beneficiaries of the remuneration described above. The amount of the aggregate remuneration awarded by the Manager, which has been attributed to the Manager’s AIFMD-related business in respect of the Manager’s financial year ending 31 December 2021, to its senior management was GBP£0.1 million, and to members of its staff whose actions have a material impact on the risk profile of the Manager’s AIFMD-related business was GBP£79.7 million. AIFM report on remuneration (unaudited) continued

Section 5: Additional information 129 Report on remuneration The Alternative Investment Fund Managers’ Directive (the AIFMD) requires certain disclosures to be made with regard to the remuneration policy of the Company’s AIFM. Details of the BlackRock AIFM Remuneration Policy are disclosed on the Company’s website at www.blackrock.com/uk/thrg and have applied to the Manager since 1 January 2015, being the beginning of the first financial year of BlackRock following the Manager’s authorisation as an AIFM. Quantitative remuneration disclosure Appropriate disclosures will be made in due course in accordance with FUND 3.3.5, Article 22(2)(e) and 22(2)(f) of the AIFMD and Article 107 of the Delegated Regulation. Leverage The Company may employ leverage and borrow cash in accordance with its stated investment policy or investment strategy. Consistent with its investment objectives and policy, the Company may utilise derivative instruments as part of its investment policy. The use of derivatives may expose the Company to a higher degree of risk. In particular, derivative contracts can be highly volatile, and the amount of initial margin is generally small relative to the size of the contract so that transactions may be leveraged in terms of market exposure. A relatively small market movement may have a potentially larger impact on derivatives than on standard underlying bonds or equities. Leveraged derivative positions can therefore increase the Company’s volatility. The use of borrowings and leverage has attendant risks and can, in certain circumstances, substantially increase the adverse impact to which the Company’s investment portfolio may be subject. Derivatives were used for leverage purposes during the year. For the purposes of this disclosure, leverage is any method by which the Company’s exposure is increased, whether through borrowing of cash or securities, or leverage embedded in foreign exchange forward contracts or by any other means. The AIFMD requires that each leverage ratio be expressed as the ratio between a Company’s exposure and its NAV, and prescribes two required methodologies, the gross methodology and the commitment methodology (as set out in AIFMD Level 2 Implementation Guidance), for calculating such exposure. Using the methodologies prescribed under the AIFMD, the leverage of the Company is disclosed in the table below: Derivatives: Commitment Leverage as at 30 November 2022 Gross Leverage as at 30 November 2022 Leverage ratio 1.08 1.13 Other risk disclosures The financial risk disclosures relating to risk framework and liquidity risk are set out in note 16 to the notes to the Financial Statements on pages 103 to 115. Pre-investment disclosures The AIFMD requires certain information to be made available to investors in AIFs before they invest and requires that material changes to this information be disclosed in the annual report of each AIF. An Investor Disclosure Document, which sets out information on the Company’s investment strategy and policies, leverage, risk, liquidity, administration, management, fees, conflicts of interest and other shareholder information is available on the website at blackrock.com/uk/thrg. There have been no material changes (other than those reflected in these Financial Statements) to this information requiring disclosure. Any information requiring immediate disclosure pursuant to the AIFMD will be disclosed to the London Stock Exchange through a primary information provider. In addition, the European Union’s PRIIPs Regulation requires that a key information document (KID) also be made available to investors before they invest. The PRIIPs compliant KID can also be found on the Company’s website at blackrock.com/uk/thrg. KEVIN MAYGER For and on behalf of BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited Company Secretary 9 February 2023 Other AIFMD Disclosures (unaudited)

130 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 The disclosures below are made in compliance with the requirements of Listing Rule 9.8.4. 9.8.4 (1) The Company has not capitalised any interest in the period under review. 9.8.4 (2) The Company has not published any unaudited financial information in a class 1 circular or prospectus or any profit forecast or profit estimate. 9.8.4 (3) This provision has been deleted. 9.8.4 (4) The Company does not have any long term incentive schemes in operation. 9.8.4 (5) and (6) No Director of the Company has waived or agreed to waive any current or future emoluments from the Company or any subsidiary undertaking. 9.8.4 (7) The Company allotted no ordinary shares during the year. The Company is a stand-alone entity therefore Listing Rules 9.8.4 (8) and 9.8.4 (9) are not applicable. 9.8.4 (10) There were no contracts of significance subsisting during the period under review to which the Company is a party and in which a Director of the Company is or was materially interested, or between the Company and a controlling shareholder. 9.8.4 (11) This provision is not applicable to the Company. 9.8.4 (12) and (13) There were no arrangements under which a shareholder has waived or agreed to waive any dividends or future dividends. 9.8.4 (14) This provision is not applicable to the Company. KEVIN MAYGER For and on behalf of BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited Company Secretary 9 February 2023 Information to be disclosed in accordance with Listing Rule 9.8.4

Section 5: Additional information 131 Alternative Performance Measure (APM) An APM is a measure of performance or financial position that is not defined in applicable accounting standards and cannot be directly derived from the Financial Statements. The Company’s APMs are set out below and are cross-referenced where relevant to the financial inputs used to derive them as contained in other sections of the Annual Report. Benchmark Index The Company’s Benchmark Index used for performance comparative purposes is the Numis Smaller Companies plus AIM (excluding Investment Companies) Index. Benchmark Index outperformance/underperformance is measured by comparing the Company’s net asset value return (NAV) total return, with the performance of the Benchmark Index on a total return basis. As at 30 November 2022, the Company’s NAV total return was -31.1% and the total return of the Benchmark Index was -17.5%, therefore the Company’s NAV underperformance of the Benchmark Index was 13.6 percentage points. As at 30 November 2022, the Company’s share price return was -35.5% and the total return of the Benchmark Index was -17.5%, therefore the Company’s Share Price underperformance of the Benchmark Index was 18.0 percentage points. Closed-ended company An investment trust works along the same lines as a unit trust, in that it pools money from investors which is then managed on a collective basis. The main difference is that an investment trust is a company listed on the Stock Exchange and, in most cases, trading takes place in shares which have already been issued, rather than through the creation or redemption of units. As the number of shares which can be issued or cancelled at any one time is limited, and requires the approval of existing shareholders, investment trusts are known as closed-ended funds or companies. This means that investment trusts are not subject to the same liquidity constraints as open-ended funds and can therefore invest in less liquid investments. Contract for difference (CFD) A contract for difference is an agreement to exchange the difference in value of a particular share or index between the time at which a contract is opened and the time at which it is closed. A CFD allows an investor to gain access to the movement in the share price or index by putting down a small amount of cash known as a margin. CFDs do not have an expiry date like options or futures contracts. As opposed to an expiry date a CFD is effectively renewed at the close of each trading day and rolled forward if desired. Discount and premium* Investment trust shares frequently trade at a discount to NAV. This occurs when the share price (based on the mid- market share price) is less than the NAV. In this circumstance, the price that an investor pays or receives for a share would be less than the value attributable to it by reference to the underlying assets. The discount is the difference between the share price and the NAV, expressed as a percentage of the NAV. As at 30 November 2022, the share price was 595.00p (2021: 935.00p) and the audited NAV per share was 626.10p (2021: 921.91p), therefore giving a discount of 5.0% (2021: a premium of 1.4%) (please see note 9 of the Financial Statements for the audited inputs to the calculations). A premium occurs when the share price (based on the mid- market share price) is more than the NAV and investors would therefore be paying more than the value attributable to the shares by reference to the underlying assets. For example, if the share price was 370p and the NAV 365p, the premium would be 1.4%. Discounts and premia are mainly the consequence of supply and demand for the shares on the stock market. Gearing and borrowings* The Company may achieve gearing through borrowings or the effect of gearing through an appropriate balance of equity capital, investment in derivatives and borrowings. The maximum exposure the Company may have to derivatives for investment purposes and efficient portfolio management purposes, in aggregate, is 120% of the Company’s gross assets. The Company may use borrowings and enter into derivative transactions that have the effect of gearing the Company’s portfolio to enhance performance. Glossary * Alternative Performance Measures.

132 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 The Company’s gross and net gearing through the use of long and short CFD positions as at 30 November 2022 and 30 November 2021 is set out in the table below. Net gearing calculation Page 30 November 2022 £’000 30 November 2021 £’000 Long investment positions (excluding BlackRock's Institutional Cash Series plc - Sterling Liquid Environmentally Aware Fund) 26 676,373 1,134,772 (a) Short investment positions 26 15,637 24,925 (b) Gross geared exposure (c = a + b) 692,010 1,159,697 (c) Net geared exposure (d = a - b) 26 660,736 1,109,847 (d) Net assets 26 633,357 935,148 (e) Gross gearing % of net assets (f = c/e x 100) 109.3% 124.1% (f) Net gearing % of net assets (g = d/e x 100) 104.3% 118.7% (g) Gross and net exposure Market exposure gained through a CFD contract refers to the gross market value of the underlying securities to which the investor is exposed through the CFD contract. Gross exposure refers to the total exposure the investor has through both long and short positions added together. For example, an investor who has 110% long market exposure through CFDs and 20% short market exposure through CFDs has gross market exposure of 130%. Net exposure refers to the exposure the investor has through long positions less any short positions. For example, an investor who has 110% long market exposure through CFDs and 20% short market exposure through CFDs has net market exposure of 90%; this method of measurement is looking at the net directional market exposure and takes into account the fact that long and short positions theoretically offset one another when the market moves in a particular direction. Leverage Leverage is defined in the AIFMD as “any method by which the AIFM increases the exposure of an AIF it manages whether through borrowing of cash or securities, or leverage embedded in derivative positions or by any other means”. Leverage is measured in terms of ‘exposure’ and is expressed as a ratio of net asset value: Leverage ratio = exposure net asset value The Directive sets out two methodologies for calculating exposure. These are the Gross Method and the Commitment Method. The treatment of cash and cash equivalent balances in terms of calculating what constitutes an “exposure” under AIFMD differs for these two methods. The definitions for calculating the Gross Method exposures require that “the value of any cash and cash equivalents which are highly liquid investments held in the base currency of the AIF, that are readily convertible to a known amount of cash, are subject to an insignificant risk of change in value and provide a return no greater than the rate of a three-month high quality government bond” should be excluded from exposure calculations. The Commitment Method enables instruments to be netted off to reflect ‘netting’ or ‘hedging’ arrangements and the entity’s exposure is effectively reduced. Long and short exposure CFDs enable an investor to benefit from the price of a stock falling as well as rising. This enables the investor to benefit from negative as well as positive views on individual stocks. Entering into a CFD that results in a profit if the share price movement falls, is referred to as taking a short position. The counterparty pays the investor interest on the cash deposited with it, which collateralises the short positions and deductions are made from the value of the short CFD contract in respect of dividends payable in relation to these stocks. Entering into a CFD contract that results in a profit if the share price movement rises, is referred to as taking a long position. The investor pays a financing charge on long positions and receives payments from the counterparty in respect of dividends payable in relation to these long positions. NAV per share (Cum income NAV) This is the value of the Company’s assets attributable to one ordinary share. It is calculated by dividing ‘total equity’ by the total number of ordinary shares in issue (excluding treasury shares) as set out in note 9 to the Financial Statements on page 99 for the audited inputs to the calculation. For example, as at 30 November 2022, total equity was £633,357,000 (2021: 935,148,000) and there were 101,158,864 (2021: 101,435,964) ordinary shares in issue (excluding treasury shares) as set out in note 9 to the Financial Statements on page 99 for the audited inputs to the calculation; the NAV was therefore 626.10p per ordinary share (2021: 921.91p). Total equity is calculated by deducting from the Company’s total assets, its current and long term liabilities and any provision for liabilities and charges. * Alternative Performance Measures. Glossary continued

Section 5: Additional information 133 Net asset value (NAV) and share price return (with dividends reinvested)* Performance statistics enable the investor to make performance comparisons between investment trusts with different dividend policies. The performance measures the combined effect of any dividends paid, together with the rise or fall in the share price or NAV. This is calculated by the movement in the share price or NAV plus the dividends paid by the Company assuming these are reinvested in the Company at the prevailing NAV/Share price (please see note 9 of the financial statements for the audited inputs to the calculations). NAV total return Page 30 November 2022 30 November 2021 Closing NAV per share (pence) 99 626.10 921.91 Add back quarterly dividends (pence) 99 10.60 10.20 Effect of dividend reinvestment (pence) (1.66) 1.40 Adjusted closing NAV (pence) 635.04 933.51 (a) Opening NAV per share (pence) 99 921.91 681.24 (b) NAV total return (c = ((a - b)/b)) (31.1)% 37.0% (c) Share price total return Page 30 November 2022 30 November 2021 Closing share price (pence) 99 595.00 935.00 Add back quarterly dividends (pence) 99 10.60 10.20 Effect of dividend reinvestment (pence) (2.11) 1.43 Adjusted closing share price (pence) 603.49 946.63 (a) Opening share price (pence) 99 935.00 682.00 (b) Share price total return (c = ((a - b)/b)) (35.5)% 38.8% (c) Ongoing charges ratio* Ongoing charges (%) = Annualised ongoing charges Average undiluted net asset value in the period Ongoing charges are those expenses of a type which are likely to recur in the foreseeable future, whether charged to capital or revenue, and which relate to the operation of the investment company as a collective fund. Ongoing charges are based on costs incurred in the year as being the best estimate of future costs and include the annual management charge. As recommended by the AIC in its guidance, ongoing charges are calculated using the Company’s annualised revenue and capital expenses (excluding finance costs, direct transaction costs, custody transaction charges, VAT recovered, taxation, prior year expenses written back and certain non-recurring items) expressed as a percentage of the average daily net assets of the Company during the year. The inputs that have been used to calculate the ongoing charges percentage are set out in the following table: Ongoing charges calculation Page 30 November 2022 £’000 30 November 2021 £’000 Management fee 96 3,025 3,652 Other operating expenses 1, 2 97 816 1,078 Total management fee and other operating expenses 3,841 4,730 (a) Performance fee 96 – 6,655 (b) Total management and performance fees and other operating expenses (c = a + b) 3,841 11,385 (c) Average daily net assets in the year 710,265 824,909 (d) Ongoing charges in the year excluding performance fees (e = a/d) 0.54% 0.57% (e) Ongoing charges in the year including performance fees (f = c/d) 0.54% 1.38% (f) 1 Excluding prior year expenses written off during the year and non-recurring expenses relating to stock exchange listing fees of £53,000 incurred during the year ended 30 November 2022 (30 November 2021: £nil). Revenue profit and revenue reserves Revenue profit is the net revenue income earned after deduction of fees and expenses allocated to the revenue account and taxation suffered by the Company. Revenue reserves is the undistributed income that the Company keeps as reserves. Investment trusts do not have to distribute all the income they generate after expenses. They may retain up to 15% of revenue generated which will be held in a revenue reserve. This reserve can be used at a later date to supplement dividend payments to shareholders. Treasury shares Treasury shares are shares that a company keeps in its own treasury which are not currently issued to the public. These shares do not pay dividends, have no voting rights and are not included in a company’s total issued share capital amount for calculating percentage ownership. Treasury stock may have come from a repurchase or buy back from shareholders, or it may never have been issued to the public in the first place. Treasury shares may be reissued from treasury to the public to meet demand for a company’s shares in certain circumstances. * Alternative Performance Measures.

Section 6: Notice of annual general meeting 135 Annual general meeting Diploma PLC was one of the portfolio’s ten largest holdings at year end. An international Group, Diploma is a value-added distributor of specialised technical products and services, operating in its three Sectors: Controls, Seals and Life Sciences. The Group’s largest business is Windy City Wire (pictured), accounting for around 25% of total revenue. Part of the Controls Sector, Windy City Wire is a value-added distributor of premium quality, low voltage wire and cable. PHOTO COURTESY OF DIPLOMA GROUP

136 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 Notice is hereby given that the Annual General Meeting of BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc will be held at the offices of BlackRock, 12 Throgmorton Avenue, London EC2N 2DL on Thursday, 23 March 2023 at 12.00 p.m. for the purpose of considering and, if thought fit, passing the following resolutions (which will be proposed in the case of resolutions 1 to 13, as ordinary resolutions and, in the case of resolutions 14 to 16, as special resolutions). Ordinary business 1. To receive the report of the Directors of the Company and the Financial Statements for the year ended 30 November 2022, together with the report of the auditor thereon. 2. To approve the Directors’ Remuneration Report for the year ended 30 November 2022 (excluding any content relating to the remuneration policy). 3. To approve the Directors’ Remuneration Policy as set out on pages 73 and 74. 4. To approve a final dividend of 8.50 pence per share. 5. To re-elect Christopher Samuel as a Director of the Company. 6. To re-elect Louise Nash as a Director of the Company. 7. To re-elect Angela Lane as a Director of the Company. 8. To re-elect Nigel Burton as a Director of the Company. 9. To re-elect Merryn Somerset Webb as a Director of the Company. 10. To elect Glen Suarez as a Director of the Company. 11. To re-appoint PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Auditor to the Company to hold office until the conclusion of the next Annual General Meeting of the Company. 12. To authorise the Audit Committee to determine the Auditor’s remuneration. Special business Ordinary resolutions 13. That, in substitution for all existing authorities, the Directors of the Company be and they are hereby generally and unconditionally authorised pursuant to Section 551 of the Companies Act 2006 (the Act), to exercise all the powers of the Company to allot shares in the Company and to grant rights to subscribe for or to convert any security into shares in the Company up to an aggregate nominal amount of £505,569.32 (being 10% of the aggregate nominal amount of the issued share capital excluding treasury shares of the Company at the date of this notice) provided that this authority shall expire at the conclusion of the next Annual General Meeting of the Company to be held in 2024 but so that the Company may, before such expiry, make any offer or agreement which would or might require relevant securities to be allotted pursuant to any such offer or agreement as if the authority hereby conferred had not expired. Special resolutions 14. That, in substitution for all existing authorities and subject to the passing of resolution 13, the Directors of the Company be and are hereby empowered pursuant to Sections 570 and 573 of the Companies Act 2006 (the Act) to allot equity securities (as defined in Section 560 of the Act), and to sell equity securities held by the Company as treasury shares (as defined in Section 724 of the Act) for cash pursuant to the authority granted by resolution 13, as if Section 561(1) of the Act did not apply to any such allotments and sales of equity securities, provided that this power: (a) shall expire at the conclusion of the next Annual General Meeting of the Company to be held in 2024, except that the Company may before such expiry make offers or agreements which would or might require equity securities to be allotted or sold after such expiry and notwithstanding such expiry the Directors may allot and sell equity securities in pursuance of such offers or agreements; (b) shall be limited to the allotment of equity securities and/or sale of equity securities held in treasury for cash up to an aggregate nominal amount of £505,569.32 (representing 10% of the aggregate nominal amount of the issued share capital, excluding treasury shares of the Company at the date of this notice); and (c) shall be limited to the allotment of equity securities and/or the sale of equity securities held in treasury at a price of not less than the net asset value per share as close as practicable to the allotment or sale. 15. That, in substitution for the Company’s existing authority to make market purchases of ordinary shares of 5p in the Company (Shares), the Company be and is hereby authorised in accordance with Section 701 of the Companies Act 2006 (the Act) to make market purchases of Shares (within the meaning of Section 693 of the Act), provided that: (a) the maximum number of Shares hereby authorised to be purchased is 15,156,968 (being 14.99% of the Company’s issued ordinary share capital, excluding treasury shares at the date of this notice); (b) the minimum price (exclusive of expenses) which may be paid for a Share shall be 5p being the nominal value per share; Notice of annual general meeting

Section 6: Notice of annual general meeting 137 (c) the maximum price (exclusive of expenses) which may be paid for a Share shall be the higher of: (i) 5% above the average of the market value of a Share for the five business days immediately preceding the date of purchase as derived from the Daily Official List of the London Stock Exchange; and (ii) the higher of the price quoted for (a) the last independent trade of; and (b) the highest current independent bid for, any number of Shares on the trading venue where the purchase is carried out; and (d) unless renewed, the authority hereby conferred shall expire at the conclusion of the next Annual General Meeting of the Company to be held in 2024 save that the Company may, prior to such expiry, enter into a contract to purchase Shares which will or may be completed or executed wholly or partly after such expiry. All Shares purchased pursuant to the above authority shall be either: (i) held, sold, transferred or otherwise dealt with as treasury shares in accordance with the provisions of the Act; or (ii) cancelled immediately upon completion of the purchase. 16. That, the period of notice required for general meetings of the Company (other than Annual General Meetings) shall be not less than 14 clear days’ notice. By order of the Board KEVIN MAYGER For and on behalf of BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited Company Secretary 9 February 2023 Registered Office: 12 Throgmorton Avenue London EC2N 2DL

138 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022 Notes: 1. A member entitled to attend and vote at the meeting convened by the above Notice is entitled to appoint one or more proxies to exercise all or any of the rights of the member to attend, speak and vote in his place. A proxy need not be a member of the Company. If a member appoints more than one proxy to attend the meeting, each proxy must be appointed to exercise the rights attached to a different share or shares held by the member. 2. To appoint a proxy, you may use the form of proxy enclosed with this annual report. To be valid, the form of proxy, together with the power of attorney or other authority (if any) under which it is signed or a notarially certified or office copy of the same, must be completed and returned to the office of the Company’s registrar in accordance with the instructions printed thereon as soon as possible and in any event by not later than 12.00 p.m. on 21 March 2023. Amended instructions must also be received by the Company’s registrar by the deadline for receipt of forms of proxy. Alternatively, you can vote or appoint a proxy electronically by visiting eproxyappointment.com. You will be asked to enter the Control Number, the Shareholder Reference Number and PIN which are printed on the form of proxy. The latest time for the submission of proxy votes electronically is 12.00 p.m. on 21 March 2023. 3. Proxymity Voting – if you are an institutional investor you may also be able to appoint a proxy electronically via the Proxymity platform, a process which has been agreed by the Company and approved by the Registrar. For further information regarding Proxymity, please go to www. proxymity.io. Your proxy must be lodged by 12.00 p.m. on 21 March 2023 in order to be considered valid. Before you can appoint a proxy via this process you will need to have agreed to Proxymity’s associated terms and conditions. It is important that you read these carefully as you will be bound by them and they will govern the electronic appointment of your proxy. 4. Completion and return of the form of proxy will not prevent you from attending the meeting and voting in person. If you have appointed a proxy and attend the meeting in person, your proxy appointment will be automatically terminated. 5. Any person receiving a copy of this Notice as a person nominated by a member to enjoy information rights under Section 146 of the Companies Act 2006 (a Nominated Person) should note that the provisions in Notes 1 and 2 above concerning the appointment of a proxy or proxies to attend the meeting in place of a member, do not apply to a Nominated Person as only ordinary shareholders have the right to appoint a proxy. However, a Nominated Person may have a right under an agreement between the Nominated Person and the member by whom he or she was nominated to be appointed, or to have someone else appointed, as proxy for the meeting. If a Nominated Person has no such proxy appointment right or does not wish to exercise it, he/she may have a right under such agreement to give instructions to the member as to the exercise of voting rights at the meeting. 6. Nominated Persons should also remember that their main point of contact in terms of their investment in the Company remains the member who nominated the Nominated Person to enjoy the information rights (or perhaps the custodian or broker who administers the investment on their behalf). Nominated Persons should continue to contact that member, custodian or broker (and not the Company) regarding any changes or queries relating to the Nominated Person’s personal details and interest in the Company (including any administrative matter). The only exception to this is where the Company expressly requests a response from the Nominated Person. 7. Only shareholders registered in the register of members of the Company by not later than 6.00 p.m. two days prior to the time fixed for the meeting shall be entitled to attend and vote at the meeting in respect of the number of the ordinary shares registered in their name at such time. If the meeting is adjourned, the time by which a person must be entered on the register of members of the Company in order to have the right to attend and vote at the adjourned meeting is 6.00 p.m. two days prior to the time of adjournment. Changes to the register of members after the relevant times shall be disregarded in determining the rights of any person to attend and vote at the meeting. 8. In the case of joint holders, the vote of the senior holder who tenders a vote, whether in person or by proxy, shall be accepted to the exclusion of the votes of the other joint holders and, for this purpose, seniority will be determined by the order in which the names stand in the register of members of the Company in respect of the relevant joint holding. 9. Shareholders who hold their ordinary shares electronically may submit their votes through CREST, by submitting the appropriate and authenticated CREST message so as to be received by the Company’s registrar not later than 48 hours before the start of the meeting. Instructions on how to vote through CREST can be found by accessing the following website: euroclear.com/CREST. Shareholders are advised that CREST and the internet are the only methods by which completed proxies can be submitted electronically. 10. If you are a CREST system user (including a CREST personal member) you can appoint one or more proxies or give an instruction to a proxy by having an appropriate CREST message transmitted. To appoint one or more proxies or to give an instruction to a proxy (whether previously appointed or otherwise) via the CREST system, CREST messages must be received by Computershare (ID number 3RA50) not later than 48 hours before the time appointed for holding the meeting. For this purpose, the time of receipt will be taken to be the time (as determined by the timestamp generated by the CREST system) from which Computershare is able to retrieve the message. CREST personal members or other CREST sponsored members should contact their CREST sponsor for assistance with appointing proxies via CREST. For further information on CREST procedures, limitations and system timings please refer to the CREST manual. The Company may treat as invalid a proxy appointment sent by CREST in the circumstances set out in Regulation 35(5)(a) of The Uncertificated Securities Regulations 2001. 11. If the Chairman, as a result of a proxy appointment, is given discretion as to how the votes subject of those proxies are cast and voting rights in respect of those discretionary proxies, when added to the interest in the Company’s securities already held by the Chairman, result in the Chairman holding such number of voting rights that he has a notifiable obligation under the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules, the Chairman will make the necessary notifications to the Company and the Financial Conduct Authority. As a result, any member holding 3% or more of the voting rights in the Company, who grants the Chairman a discretionary proxy in respect of some or all of those voting rights and so would otherwise have a notification obligation under the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules, need not make a separate notification to the Company and Financial Conduct Authority. 12. Any questions relevant to the business of the meeting may be asked at the meeting by anyone permitted to speak at the meeting. A shareholder may alternatively submit a question in advance by a letter addressed to the Company Secretary at the Company’s registered office. Under Section 319A of the Companies Act 2006, the Company must answer any Notice of annual general meeting continued

Section 6: Notice of annual general meeting 139 question a shareholder asks relating to the business being dealt with at the meeting, unless (i) answering the question would interfere unduly with the preparation for the meeting or involve the disclosure of confidential information; (ii) the answer had already been given on a website in the form of an answer to a question; or (iii) it is undesirable in the interests of the Company or the good order of the meeting that the question be answered. 13. Any corporation which is a member can appoint one or more corporate representatives who may exercise on its behalf all of its powers as a member provided that, if it is appointing more than one corporate representative, it does not do so in relation to the same shares. It is therefore no longer necessary to nominate a designated corporate representative. 14. Under Section 527 of the Companies Act 2006, members meeting the threshold requirements set out in that section have the right to require the Company to publish on a website a statement setting out any matter relating to: (i) the audit of the Company’s Financial Statements (including the auditor’s report and the conduct of the audit) that are to be laid before the meeting; or (ii) any circumstance connected with an auditor of the Company ceasing to hold office since the previous meeting at which annual financial statements and reports were laid in accordance with Section 437 of the Companies Act 2006. The Company may not require the members requesting any such website publication to pay its expenses in complying with Sections 527 or 528 of the Companies Act 2006. Where the Company is required to place a statement on a website under Section 527 of the Companies Act 2006, it must forward the statement to the Company’s auditors not later than the time when it makes the statement available on the website. The business which may be dealt with at the meeting includes any statement that the Company has been required under Section 527 of the Companies Act 2006 to publish on a website. 15. Under Sections 338 and 338A of the Act, members meeting the threshold requirements in those sections have the right to require the Company: (i) to give, to members of the Company entitled to receive notice of the meeting, notice of a resolution which may properly be moved and is intended to be moved at the meeting; and/or (ii) to include in the business to be dealt with at the meeting any matter (other than a proposed resolution) which may be properly included in the business. A resolution may properly be moved, or a matter may properly be included in the business unless: (a) (in the case of a resolution only) it would, if passed, be ineffective (whether by reason of inconsistency with any enactment or the Company’s constitution or otherwise); (b) it is defamatory of any person; or (c) it is frivolous or vexatious. Such a request may be in hard copy form or in electronic form, and must identify the resolution of which notice is to be given or the matter to be included in the business, must be authorised by the person or persons making it, must be received by the Company not later than 9 February 2023, being the date six weeks clear before the meeting and (in the case of a matter to be included in the business only) must be accompanied by a statement setting out the grounds for the request. 16. As at 7 February 2023 (being the last practicable date prior to the publication of this Notice of Annual General Meeting), the Company’s issued share capital consisted of 101,113,864 ordinary shares of 5p each, excluding shares held in treasury. Each ordinary share carries the right to one vote and therefore the total voting rights in the Company as at the date of this report are 101,113,864. 17. Further information regarding the meeting which the Company is required by Section 311A of the Companies Act 2006 to publish on a website in advance of the meeting, can be accessed at blackrock.com/uk/thrg. 18. No service contracts exist between the Company and any of the Directors, who hold office in accordance with letters of appointment and the Articles of Association.

Be ScamSmart Investment scams are designed to look like genuine investments Spot the warning signs Have you been: • contacted out of the blue • promised tempting returns and told the investment is safe • called repeatedly, or • told the offer is only available for a limited time? If so, you might have been contacted by fraudsters. Avoid investment fraud Reject cold calls Check the FCA Warning List Get impartial advice you hand over any money. Seek advice from someone Report a scam Find out more at www.fca.org.uk/scamsmart 1 2 3 Remember: if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is! The FCA Warning List is a list of firms and individuals we know are operating without our authorisation. If you’ve received unsolicited contact about an investment opportunity, chances are it’s a high risk investment or a scam. You should treat the call with extreme caution. The safest thing to do is to hang up. If you suspect that you have been approached by fraudsters please tell the FCA using the reporting form at www.fca.org.uk/consumers. You can also call the FCA Consumer Helpline on 0800 111 6768 If you have lost money to investment fraud, you should report it to Action Fraud on 0300 123 2040 or online at www.actionfraud.police.uk SGN001 Share fraud warning 140 BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 30 November 2022

Printed by Park Communications on FSC® certified paper. Park works to the EMAS standard and its Environmental Management System is certified to ISO 14001. This publication has been manufactured using 100% offshore wind electricity sourced from UK wind. 100% of the inks used are vegetable oil based, 95% of press chemicals are recycled for further use and, on average 99% of any waste associated with this production will be recycled and the remaining 1% used to generate energy. This document is printed on paper made of material from well-managed FSC®-certified forests and other controlled sources.

www.blackrock.com/uk/thrg