
MANAGER’S REVIEW
Our careful management of PIN’s balance sheet
supports the Company’s active capital management
approach. Since 2024, PIN has utilised leverage
through private placement notes as well as an enhanced
through adjustments to new investments, share
buybacks and asset sales. As at 31 May 2026, net debt
strength of Pantheon’s banking relationships, we were
on competitive terms that offered significant cost savings.
This, along with the reduction in the management fee
that PIN will pay Pantheon with effect from PIN’s next
information on how we manage PIN’s balance sheet.
Refocusing our investment strategy
The private equity environment has changed
significantly in recent years and we have refined our
investment strategy in response. One element of this is
to reduce the number of private equity managers in PIN’s
portfolio and, as we set out in PIN’s interim report, our
of underlying managers was positively refocused by
reduce this number through a combination of strategic
asset sales and by not committing to new funds being
raised by managers that are no longer considered as
core to PIN’s portfolio. Out of the 28 managers included
in the portfolio sale carried out during the period, 24
represented managers identified as non-core following
our evaluation. While we remain highly selective when
investing in direct investments, which we do via
Co-investments and Manager-led Secondaries,
primary managers in PIN’s portfolio for these types
of investments so as not to restrict deal flow. These
investment opportunities will continue to be originated
from the high-quality primary managers that are on
Pantheon’s wider platform.
As we make our selection, we will focus even more on
those core managers that we believe are able to generate
significant outperformance over the longer term. As part
of our due diligence processes, we look closely at how
they use their operational expertise to improve portfolio
company performance, or have built repeatable, accretive
buy-and-build capabilities. We back managers who are
sector specialists, are well networked and can offer the
complete package where their relationships, expertise
and experience really come into play. We seek to avoid
managers who have disproportionately benefited from
aggressive leverage strategies or simply a rising market,
as we do not believe these are repeatable competencies.
PIN’s portfolio emphasises North America, which has the
deepest and most developed private equity market, and
small/mid-market buyouts, which are well-established
businesses where the private equity manager has
control of the company alongside the management
teams. We will increase PIN’s exposures further to
this
region and stage. In the current environment,
our managers need to increase their focus on adding
value to their portfolio companies through operational
improvements and look for more ways to win, rather than
relying on one strategy to generate returns. As the chart
on the following page shows, private equity funds in
the middle market have exhibited strong performance
across different vintages and have outperformed
the larger funds through several market cycles. The
companies in this part of the market are often founder or
family-led and may be receiving institutional capital for
the first time. As a result, there are many pathways for
value creation as the managers and their operational
experts help their portfolio companies to achieve
operational improvements, increase their scale, expand
geographically and complete add-on acquisitions.
The availability of several exit routes is another
important factor. Private equity-backed, mid-market
companies are prime targets for strategic (or trade)
buyers as well as for large/mega buyout private equity
managers, who can take the companies through their
next stage of growth. Dry powder, which is capital
that has been raised and is available to invest but has
4
and is
concentrated among the larger buyout private equity
managers. This means that this capital is available to
purchase assets from small/mid-market managers.
Therefore, mid-market private equity managers are less
dependent on initial public offerings (“IPOs”) to exit
their portfolio companies. As part of our due diligence
process, we look closely at how our managers plan to
exit the companies in their portfolios and avoid those
with an over-reliance on the IPO market. During the
period, sales to other private equity or trade buyers
accounted for 61% and 36% of PIN’s exits respectively.
Nevertheless, as the data demonstrates, the dispersion
of returns is wide in this part of the market, so selecting
the right managers forms an important part of Pantheon’s
investment process and supports our shift to a smaller
number of the highest-quality core managers in PIN’s
portfolio.
The portfolio sale will reduce the Company’s fund
to direct Co-investments and Manager-led Secondaries
the portfolio towards an equal weighting of funds and
direct investments over time, reflecting our view that
this offers the optimal balance of risk, growth potential
and diversification. We believe that this mix of funds and
directs in PIN’s portfolio differentiates it from our peers
in the listed private equity sector.
We back
managers who
specialists, are
well networked
and can offer
package
relationships,
come into play.
4 Source: Preqin as at 31 March 2026,
downloaded on 20 May 2026. Size
Balanced, Turnaround, Co-investment
Multi-Manager, Hybrid and Private
Investment in Public Equity (“PIPE”).
18
Strategic Report (1) Manager’s Review Strategic Report (2) Governance Financial Statements Other Information
Pantheon International Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026