
Section 4: Financial statements
81
•
the financial statements and the part of the Directors’
Remuneration Report to be audited are not in agreement
with the accounting records and returns; or
•
certain disclosures of Directors’ remuneration specified by
law are not made; or
•
we have not received all the information and explanations
we require for our audit.
Corporate Governance Statement
We have reviewed the Directors’ statement in relation to
going concern, longer-term viability and that part of the
Corporate Governance Statement relating to the Company’s
compliance with the provisions of the UK Corporate
Governance Code specified for our review by the Listing
Rules.
Based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we
have concluded that each of the following elements of the
Corporate Governance Statement is materially consistent
with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained
during the audit:
•
Directors’ statement with regards to the appropriateness
of adopting the going concern basis of accounting and any
material uncertainties identified set out on pages 50 and 8
7
;
•
Directors’ explanation as to its assessment of the
Company’s prospects, the period this assessment covers
and why the period is appropriate set out on page
s 37 and
38;
•
Director’s statement on whether it has a reasonable
expectation that the Company will be able to continue in
operation and meets its liabilities set out on pages 37, 38,
50 and 8
7
;
•
Directors’ statement on fair, balanced and understandable
set out on page
73
;
•
Board’s confirmation that it has carried out a robust
assessment of the emerging and principal risks set out on
page 3
3
;
•
The section of the Annual Report that describes the review
of effectiveness of risk management and internal control
systems set out on pages 33 to 37; and
•
The section describing the work of the Audit and
Management Engagement Committee set out on pages 67
to 72
.
Responsibilities of Directors
As explained more fully in the Statement of Directors’
Responsibilities in respect of the Annual Report and
Financial Statements set out on page 7
3
, the Directors are
responsible for the preparation of the financial statements
and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view,
and for such internal control as the Directors determine is
necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements
that are free from material misstatement, whether due to
fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, the Directors are
responsible for assessing the Company’s ability to continue
as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related
to going concern and using the going concern basis of
accounting unless the Directors either intend to liquidate
the Company or to cease operations, or have no realistic
alternative but to do so.
Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial
statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements as a whole are free from
material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and
to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion.
Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is
not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with
ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it
exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are
considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they
could reasonably be expected to influence the economic
decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial
statements.
Explanation as to what extent the audit was considered
capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-
compliance with laws and regulations. We design procedures
in line with our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect
irregularities, including fraud. The risk of not detecting a
material misstatement due to fraud is higher than the risk of
not detecting one resulting from error, as fraud may involve
deliberate concealment by, for example, forgery or intentional
misrepresentations, or through collusion. The extent to
which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities,
including fraud is detailed below.
However, the primary responsibility for the prevention
and detection of fraud rests with both those charged with
governance of the Company and management.
•
We obtained an understanding of the legal and
regulatory frameworks that are applicable to the
Company and determined that the most significant are
FRS 102, the Companies Act 2006, the Listing Rules,
the UK Corporate Governance Code, the Association of
Investment Companies’ Code of Corporate Governance
and Statement of Recommended Practice, section 1158
of the Corporation Tax Act 2010 and The Companies
(Miscellaneous Reporting) Regulations 2018.
•
We understood how BlackRock Greater Europe Investment
Trust plc is complying with those frameworks through
discussions with the Audit and Management Engagement
Committee and Company Secretary, review of Board and
committee meeting minutes and review of papers provided
to the Audit and Management Engagement Committee.
•
We assessed the susceptibility of the Company’s financial
statements to material misstatement, including how fraud
might occur by considering the key risks impacting the
financial statements. We identified a fraud risk with respect