
86 BlackRock Greater Europe Investment Trust plc l Annual Report and Financial Statements 31 August 2025
Job No: 101506 Proof Event: 21 Black Line Level: 4 Park Communications Ltd Alpine Way London E6 6LA
Customer: BlackRock Project Title: Greater Europe Annual Rpt 2025 T: 0207 055 6500 F: 020 7055 6600
• The section of the Annual Report describing the work of
the Audit and Management Engagement Committee.
We have nothing to report in respect of our responsibility
to report when the directors’ statement relating to the
company’s compliance with the Code does not properly
disclose a departure from a relevant provision of the Code
specified under the Listing Rules for review by the auditors.
Responsibilities for the financial statements
and the audit
Responsibilities of the directors for the financial
statements
As explained more fully in the Statement of Directors’
Responsibilities in respect of the Annual Report and
Financial Statements, the directors are responsible for the
preparation of the financial statements in accordance with
the applicable framework and for being satisfied that they
give a true and fair view. The directors are also responsible
for such internal control as they determine is necessary to
enable the preparation of financial statements that are free
from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, the directors are
responsible for assessing the company’s ability to continue
as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related
to going concern and using the going concern basis of
accounting unless the directors either intend to liquidate
the company or to cease operations, or have no realistic
alternative but to do so.
Auditors’ responsibilities for the audit of the financial
statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements as a whole are free from
material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and
to issue an auditors’ report that includes our opinion.
Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is
not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with
ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it
exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are
considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they
could reasonably be expected to influence the economic
decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial
statements.
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-
compliance with laws and regulations. We design procedures
in line with our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect
material misstatements in respect of irregularities, including
fraud. The extent to which our procedures are capable of
detecting irregularities, including fraud, is detailed below.
Based on our understanding of the company and industry,
we identified that the principal risks of non-compliance with
laws and regulations related to breaches of Section 1158
of the Corporation Tax Act 2010, and we considered the
extent to which non-compliance might have a material effect
on the financial statements. We evaluated management’s
incentives and opportunities for fraudulent manipulation
of the financial statements (including the risk of override
of controls), and determined that the principal risks were
related to posting inappropriate journal entries to increase
the net asset value. Audit procedures performed by the
engagement team included:
• Discussions with the Manager and the Audit and
Management Engagement Committee, including
consideration of known or suspected instances of non-
compliance with laws and regulation and fraud;
• Understanding the controls implemented by the
Company and the Fund Accountant designed to prevent
and detect irregularities;
• Assessment of the Company’s compliance with the
requirements of Section 1158 of the Corporation Tax Act
2010, including recalculation of numerical aspects of the
eligibility conditions;
• Identifying and testing journal entries, in particular
year end journal entries posted by the Fund Accountant
during the preparation of the financial statements;
• Designing audit procedures to incorporate
unpredictability around the nature, timing or extent
of our testing for example, targeting transactions that
otherwise would be immaterial; and
• Reviewing relevant meeting minutes, including those of
the Audit and Management Engagement Committee.
There are inherent limitations in the audit procedures
described above. We are less likely to become aware of
instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations that
are not closely related to events and transactions reflected
in the financial statements. Also, the risk of not detecting a
material misstatement due to fraud is higher than the risk of
not detecting one resulting from error, as fraud may involve
deliberate concealment by, for example, forgery or intentional
misrepresentations, or through collusion.
Our audit testing might include testing complete populations
of certain transactions and balances, possibly using data
auditing techniques. However, it typically involves selecting
a limited number of items for testing, rather than testing
complete populations. We will often seek to target particular
items for testing based on their size or risk characteristics. In
other cases, we will use audit sampling to enable us to draw
a conclusion about the population from which the sample is
selected.
A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of
the financial statements is located on the FRC’s website at:
www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description
forms part of our auditors’ report.
Independent Auditors’ Report
continued