[CONSOLIDATION_METHOD_TITLE] [CONSOLIDATION_METHOD]
Related Companies
[]
Related Funds
[]
English
oda_LawsuitAgainstCompanyOrDevelopmentsInTheLawsuitAgainstCompanyAbstract|
Lawsuit Against Company or Developments in the Lawsuit Against Company
oda_UpdateAnnouncementFlag|
Update Notification Flag
Evet (Yes)
oda_CorrectionAnnouncementFlag|
Correction Notification Flag
Hayır (No)
oda_DateOfThePreviousNotificationAboutTheSameSubject|
Date Of The Previous Notification About The Same Subject
13.07.2018 (made by Kipa)
oda_DelayedAnnouncementFlag|
Postponed Notification Flag
Hayır (No)
oda_AnnouncementContentSection|
Announcement Content
oda_DateOfLawsuit|
Date of Lawsuit
08.05.2018
oda_NotificationDateOfLawsuitToCompany|
Notification Date of Lawsuit to Company
13.07.2018
oda_SubjectOfLawsuit|
Subject of Lawsuit
Cancellation of Kipa General Assembly decisions dated 27.04.2018
oda_CounterpartiesOfLawsuit|
Counterparties of Lawsuit
Jak Esim
oda_LawsuitAmount|
Lawsuit Amount
-
oda_RatioOfLawsuitAmountToTotalAssetsDisclosedInLatestFinancialStatementsOfEntity|
Ratio of Lawsuit Amount to Total Assets Disclosed in Latest Financial Statements of Entity (%)
-
oda_RelavantCourtAndFileNumber|
Relavant Court and File Number
T.C. Karşıyaka Commercial Court (File number: 2018/366)
oda_TrialDate|
Trial Date
-
oda_Decision|
Decision
-
oda_NextTrialDate|
Next Trial Date
03.07.2019
oda_AmountOfProvisionInFinancialStatementsIfAny|
Amount of Provision in Financial Statements if any
-
oda_EffectToOperationsOfCompany|
Effect to Operations of Company
-
oda_ExplanationSection|
Explanations
oda_ExplanationTextBlock|

The expert report dated 10.06.2019 on the lawsuit numbered 2018/366 E., regarding the cancellation of Kipa Ticaret A.Ş.  General Assembly meeting dated 27.04.2018, filed by Jak Esim at Karşıyaka Commercial Court, has been received by our Company on 12.06.2019.

In the expert report, it was stated that "i) The call (for the general assembly) in terms of the entity which made the call, the form of the call and the quorum are made in accordance with the law, Kipa Ticaret A.Ş.'s articles of association, ii) due to the fact that there is no specific instruction as to the address/location of general assembly in Kipa Ticaret A.Ş's Internal Directives, there is no harm to convene the general assembly in a location within the boundaries of civil administration in which the headquarters of the entity that made the call is residing. iii) The items in the agenda were discussed at the General Assembly, shareholders asked questions regarding agenda items and answers were provided iv) the decisions were taken by majority of votes in general, there are no evidence or records suggesting these decisions were against the law, articles of association or against good faith. v) there is no evidence that these decisions were taken by holding the shareholders under undue influence or coercion. vi) even though some of the written or verbal question by shareholders are deemed to be outside of the agenda, the answers were provided in 15 days following the General Assembly meeting".


(In case of a discrepancy between the Turkish and the English versions of this disclosure, the Turkish version shall prevail.)