[CONSOLIDATION_METHOD_TITLE] [CONSOLIDATION_METHOD]
Related Companies
[]
Related Funds
[]
English
oda_LawsuitAgainstCompanyOrDevelopmentsInTheLawsuitAgainstCompanyAbstract|
Lawsuit Against Company or Developments in the Lawsuit Against Company
oda_UpdateAnnouncementFlag|
Update Notification Flag
Evet (Yes)
oda_CorrectionAnnouncementFlag|
Correction Notification Flag
Hayır (No)
oda_DateOfThePreviousNotificationAboutTheSameSubject|
Date Of The Previous Notification About The Same Subject
13.07.2018 (made by Kipa), 19.06.2019, 12.09.2019
oda_DelayedAnnouncementFlag|
Postponed Notification Flag
Hayır (No)
oda_AnnouncementContentSection|
Announcement Content
oda_DateOfLawsuit|
Date of Lawsuit
08.05.2018
oda_NotificationDateOfLawsuitToCompany|
Notification Date of Lawsuit to Company
13.07.2018
oda_SubjectOfLawsuit|
Subject of Lawsuit
Cancellation of Kipa General Assembly decisions dated 27.04.2018
oda_CounterpartiesOfLawsuit|
Counterparties of Lawsuit
Jak Esim
oda_LawsuitAmount|
Lawsuit Amount
-
oda_RatioOfLawsuitAmountToTotalAssetsDisclosedInLatestFinancialStatementsOfEntity|
Ratio of Lawsuit Amount to Total Assets Disclosed in Latest Financial Statements of Entity (%)
-
oda_RelavantCourtAndFileNumber|
Relavant Court and File Number
T.C. Karşıyaka Commercial Court (File number: 2018/366)
oda_TrialDate|
Trial Date
27.11.2019
oda_Decision|
Decision
The Court gave two weeks to the parties to submit their petitions for declaration on the expert report.
oda_NextTrialDate|
Next Trial Date
25.12.2019
oda_AmountOfProvisionInFinancialStatementsIfAny|
Amount of Provision in Financial Statements if any
-
oda_EffectToOperationsOfCompany|
Effect to Operations of Company
-
oda_ExplanationSection|
Explanations
oda_ExplanationTextBlock|

With respect to the lawsuit with the file number 2018/366 E. at Karşıyaka Commercial Court regarding the cancellation of Kipa Ticaret A.Ş.'s Ordinary General Assembly decisions dated 27.04.2018, the second expert report dated 27.11.2019 states briefly that;

(i) Migros Ticaret A.Ş. had 96.25% of the total voting rights in the General Assembly, in case the Court, as per the Influence Rule, acknowledges that even if the will of the shareholders was affected during the General Assembly as claimed, the Court should be ruling, by taking into account that the General Assembly decisions would have been accepted considering the potential votes of the shareholders whose decision would be affected as alleged, and that the General Assembly decisions could not be cancelled.

(ii ) In case the Court come to a conclusion that it was not possible to vote during the General Assembly due to pressure and threat as alleged, there is nothing contravening the law, the Article of the Association or good faith which would result in the cancellation of the General Assembly decisions.

The Court gave two weeks to the parties to submit their petitions for declaration on the expert report. The next trial is scheduled on 25.12.2019.

(In case of a discrepancy between the Turkish and the English versions of this disclosure, the Turkish version shall prevail.)