| Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements do not include all of the information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared
in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles (“GAAP”) and, in the opinion of management, contain all adjustments (which consist of only normal
recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of such financial information. Results of operations for interim periods
are not necessarily indicative of those to be achieved for full fiscal years. The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March
31, 2018 is derived from the March 31, 2018 audited financial statements. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
should be read in conjunction with Castle Brands Inc.’s (the “Company”) audited consolidated financial statements
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31,
2018, as amended (“2018 Form 10-K”). Please refer to the notes to the audited consolidated financial statements included
in the 2018 Form 10-K for additional disclosures and a description of accounting policies.
| A. |
Description of business - The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries, Castle Brands (USA) Corp. (“CB-USA”) and McLain & Kyne, Ltd., the Company’s wholly-owned foreign subsidiaries, Castle Brands Spirits Group Limited and Castle Brands Spirits Marketing and Sales Company Limited, and the Company’s 80.1% ownership interest in Gosling-Castle Partners Inc. (“GCP”), with adjustments for income or loss allocated based upon percentage of ownership. The accounts of the subsidiaries have been included as of the date of acquisition. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. |
| |
|
| B. |
Liquidity - In November 2018, the Company extended the term of the loan and security agreement (as amended and restated) to July 31, 2020 (as described in Note 7C). The Company believes that its current cash and working capital and the availability under the Credit Facility (as defined in Note 7C) will enable it to fund its obligations, meet its working capital needs, maturing debt obligations and whiskey purchase commitments until it achieves profitability, ensure continuity of supply of its brands and support new brand initiatives and marketing programs through at least November 2019. The Company can continue to meet its operating needs through additional mechanisms including additional or expanded debt financings, potential equity offerings and limiting or adjusting the timing of additional inventory purchases based on available resources. |
| |
|
| C. |
Organization and operations - The Company is principally engaged in the importation, marketing and sale of premium and super premium rums, whiskeys, liqueurs, vodka and related non-alcoholic beverage products, including ginger beer, in the United States, Canada, Europe and Asia. |
| |
|
| D. |
Revenues - The Company operates in one reportable segment and derives substantially all of its revenue from the sale and delivery of premium beverage alcohol and related non-beverage alcohol products. In the U.S., the Company is required by law to use state-licensed distributors or, in the control states, state-owned agencies performing this function, to sell its brands to retail outlets. In its international markets, the Company relies primarily on established spirits distributors in much the same way as in the U.S. Revenue from product sales is recognized when the product is shipped to a customer (generally a distributor) and title and risk of loss has passed to the customer in accordance with the terms of sale and collection is reasonably assured. Revenue is not recognized on shipments to control states in the United States until such time as product is sold through to the retail channel. |
| |
|
| |
The Company does not ship product unless it has received an order or other documentation authorizing delivery to its customers. Revenue is measured as the amount of consideration the Company expects to receive in exchange for transferring goods. The Company generally does not provide post-delivery services and does not offer a right-of-return except in the case of an error. Uncollectable accounts receivable are estimated by using a combination of historical customer experience and a customer-by-customer analysis. The Company’s payment terms vary by customer and, in certain cases, the products offered. The term between invoicing and when payment is due is not significant. As permitted under U.S. GAAP, the Company has elected not to assess whether a contract has a significant financing component if the expectation at contract inception is such that the period between payment by the customer and the transfer of the promised goods to the customer will be one year or less. As permitted under U.S. GAAP, the Company has elected to recognize the incremental costs of obtaining a contract as an expense when incurred as the amortization period of the asset that the Company otherwise would have recognized will be one year or less. As permitted under U.S. GAAP, the Company has elected to exclude from the measurement of the transaction price all taxes assessed by a governmental authority that are both imposed on and concurrent with a specific revenue-producing transaction and collected by the Company from a customer, i.e excise taxes (see note 1H). As permitted under U.S. GAAP, the Company has elected to account for any shipping and handling activities that occur after a customer obtains control of any goods as activities to fulfill the promise to transfer the goods, and the Company is not required to evaluate whether such shipping and handling activities are promised services to its customers. |
| |
See Note 13 for disaggregation of revenue by segment and product as the Company believes this best depicts how the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of its revenues and cash flows are affected by economic factors. |
| |
|
| |
The Company does not have any customer contracts that meet the definition of unsatisfied performance obligations in accordance with U.S. GAAP. |
| |
|
| E. |
Equity investments - Equity investments are carried at original cost adjusted for the Company’s proportionate share of the investees’ income, losses and distributions. The Company assesses the carrying value of its equity investments when an indicator of a loss in value is present and records a loss in value of the investment when the assessment indicates that an other-than-temporary decline in the investment exists. The Company classifies its equity earnings of equity investments as a component of net income or loss. |
| |
|
| F. |
Goodwill and other intangible assets - Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price including related costs over the value assigned to the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets of businesses acquired. Goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized, but instead are tested for impairment annually, or more frequently if circumstances indicate a possible impairment may exist. Intangible assets with estimable useful lives are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives, generally on a straight-line basis, and are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. |
| |
|
| G. |
Impairment of long-lived assets - Under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 310, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets”, the Company periodically reviews whether changes have occurred that would require revisions to the carrying amounts of its definite lived, long-lived assets. When the sum of the expected future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss is recognized based on the fair value of the asset. |
| |
|
| H. |
Excise taxes and duty - Excise taxes and duty are computed at standard rates based on alcohol proof per gallon/liter and are paid after finished goods are imported into the United States or other relevant jurisdiction and then transferred out of “bond.” Excise taxes and duty are recorded to inventory as a component of the cost of the underlying finished goods. When the underlying products are sold “ex warehouse”, the sales price reflects the taxes paid and the inventoried excise taxes and duties are charged to cost of sales. |
| |
|
| I. |
Foreign currency - The functional currency for the Company’s foreign operations is the Euro in Ireland and the British Pound in the United Kingdom. Under ASC 830, “Foreign Currency Matters”, the translation from the applicable foreign currencies to U.S. Dollars is performed for balance sheet accounts using exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date and for revenue and expense accounts using a weighted average exchange rate during the period. The resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income. Gains or losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are shown as a separate line item in the consolidated statements of operations. |
| J. |
Fair value of financial instruments - ASC 825, “Financial Instruments”, defines the fair value of a financial instrument as the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties and requires disclosure of the fair value of certain financial instruments. The Company believes that there is no material difference between the fair-value and the reported amounts of financial instruments in the Company’s balance sheets due to the short-term maturity of these instruments, or with respect to the Company’s debt, as compared to the current borrowing rates available to the Company. |
| |
|
| |
The Company’s investments are reported at fair value in accordance with authoritative guidance, which accomplishes the following key objectives: |
| |
- |
Defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date; |
| |
|
|
| |
- |
Establishes a three-level hierarchy (“valuation hierarchy”) for fair value measurements; |
| |
|
|
| |
- |
Requires consideration of the Company’s creditworthiness when valuing liabilities; and |
| |
|
|
| |
- |
Expands disclosures about instruments measured at fair value. |
| |
The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels of the valuation hierarchy are as follows: |
| |
- |
Level 1 - inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. |
| |
|
|
| |
- |
Level 2 - inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are directly or indirectly observable for the asset or liability for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. |
| |
|
|
| |
- |
Level 3 - inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. |
| K. |
Income taxes - In December 2017, the
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “2017 Tax Act”) was enacted. The 2017 Tax Act includes a number of changes to existing U.S.
tax laws that impact the Company, most notably a reduction of the U.S. corporate income tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent
for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. The Company recognized the income tax effects of the 2017 Tax Act in its current
financial statements in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, which provides SEC staff guidance for the application
of ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes”, (“ASC 740”) in the reporting period in which the 2017 Tax Act was signed
into law. As such, the Company’s financial results reflect the income tax effects of the 2017 Tax Act for which the accounting
under ASC 740 is complete. The Company did not identify items for which the income tax effects of the 2017 Tax Act have not been
completed and a reasonable estimate could not be determined as of September 30, 2018.
The 2017 Tax Act reduced the U.S. federal corporate
tax rate from 35.0% to 21.0% for all corporations effective January 1, 2018. For fiscal year companies, the change in law requires
the application of a blended rate for each quarter of the fiscal year, which in the Company’s case is 30.79% for the fiscal
year ended March 31, 2018. Thereafter, the applicable statutory rate is 21.0%.
Under ASC 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities
are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. A valuation allowance is provided to the extent a deferred tax
asset is not considered recoverable.
The Company has adopted the provisions of ASC
740 and at each of September 30 and March 31, 2018, the Company had reserves for uncertain tax positions (including related interest
and penalties) for various state and local taxes of $6,778. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain
tax positions in general and administrative expense. |
| L. |
Recent accounting pronouncements –
In August 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)
2018-13, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair
Value Measurement.” This ASU adds, modifies and removes several disclosure requirements relative to the three levels of inputs
used to measure fair value in accordance with Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurement.” This guidance is effective for the
Company as of April 1, 2020, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the new guidance to determine the
impact the adoption of this guidance will have on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-09,
“Codification Improvements.” This ASU makes amendments to multiple codification Topics. The transition and effective
date guidance is based on the facts and circumstances of each amendment. Some of the amendments in this ASU do not require transition
guidance and will be effective upon issuance of this ASU. However, many of the amendments in this ASU do have transition guidance
with effective dates for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the new guidance
to determine the impact the adoption of this guidance will have on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows and financial
condition.
In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07,
“Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting.”
This ASU expands the scope of Topic 718 to include share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from nonemployees.
This ASU also clarifies that Topic 718 does not apply to share-based payments used to effectively provide (1) financing to the
issuer or (2) awards granted in conjunction with selling goods or services to customers as part of a contract accounted for under
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). This guidance is effective for the Company as of April 1, 2019, with early adoption
permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the new guidance to determine the impact the adoption of this guidance will have
on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02,
Leases (“ASU 2016-02”), which provides guidance for accounting for leases. ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to classify
leases as either finance or operating leases and to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all leases with a term
greater than 12 months regardless of the lease classification. The lease classification will determine whether the lease expense
is recognized based on an effective interest rate method or on a straight line basis over the term of the lease. For leases with
a term of 12 months or less for which there is not an option to purchase the underlying asset that the lessee is reasonably certain
to exercise, a lessee is permitted to make an accounting policy election by class of underlying asset not to recognize lease assets
and lease liabilities and should recognize lease expense for such leases generally on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Certain qualitative disclosures along with specific quantitative disclosures will be required so that users are able to understand
more about the nature of an entity’s leasing activities. Accounting for lessors remains largely unchanged from current U.S.
GAAP. In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-10, Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases and ASU 2018-11 “Leases (Topic
842): Targeted Improvements” (ASU 2018-11). ASU 2018-10 clarifies certain areas within ASU 2016-02. Prior to ASU 2018-11,
a modified retrospective transition was required for financing or operating leases existing at or entered into after the beginning
of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. ASU 2018-11 allows entities an additional transition
method to the existing requirements whereby an entity could adopt the provisions of ASU 2016-02 by recognizing a cumulative-effect
adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption without adjustment to the financial statements
for periods prior to adoption. ASU 2018-11 also allows a practical expedient that permits lessors to not separate non-lease components
from the associated lease component if certain conditions are present. An entity that elects to use the practical expedients will,
in effect, continue to account for leases that commenced before the effective date in accordance with previous GAAP unless the
lease is modified, except that lessees are required to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all operating leases
at each reporting date based on the present value of the remaining minimum rental payments that were tracked and disclosed under
previous GAAP. ASU 2016-02, ASU 2018-10 and ASU 2018-11 will be effective for the Company’s fiscal year beginning April 1,
2019 and subsequent interim periods. The Company’s current lease arrangements expire through 2021 and the Company is currently
evaluating the impact the adoption of these ASUs will have on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.
The Company does not believe that any other
recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting standards, if currently adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying
condensed consolidated financial statements. |
| |
|
| M. |
Accounting standards adopted - In February 2018, FASB issued ASU No. 2018-02, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“ASU 2018-02”), which allows for stranded tax effects in accumulated other comprehensive income resulting from the 2017 Tax Act to be reclassified to retained earnings. This guidance became effective for the Company as of April 1, 2018. The Company determined that the adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. |
| |
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting.” ASU 2017-09 provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting. This guidance became effective for the Company as of April 1, 2018. The Company determined that the adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. |
| |
|
| |
In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-05, “Other Income - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20): Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets.” ASU 2017-05 clarifies the scope and accounting of a financial asset that meets the definition of an “in-substance nonfinancial asset” and defines the term “in-substance nonfinancial asset.” ASU 2017-05 also adds guidance for partial sales of nonfinancial assets. This guidance became effective for the Company as of April 1, 2018. The Company determined that the adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. |
| |
|
| |
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business.” This ASU, which must be applied prospectively, provides a narrower framework to be used to determine if a set of assets and activities constitutes a business than under current guidance and is generally expected to result in greater consistency in the application of ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations. This guidance became effective for the Company as of April 1, 2018. The Company determined that the adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. |
| |
|
| |
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash, a consensus of the FASB’s Emerging Issues Task Force (the “Task Force”).” The new standard requires that the statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Entities will also be required to reconcile such total to amounts on the balance sheet and disclose the nature of the restrictions. The Company adopted the new standard on April 1, 2018 using a retrospective adoption method, which resulted in an adjustment to “Cash and cash equivalents including restricted cash” on the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of cashflows. The Company determined that the adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. |
| |
|
| |
In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, “Income Taxes: Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other than Inventory.” This ASU removes the prohibition against the immediate recognition of the current and deferred income tax effects of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory. This guidance became effective for the Company as of April 1, 2018. Entities must apply a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. The Company determined that the adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. |
| |
|
| |
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments”, which provides guidance on eight cash flow classification issues with the objective of reducing differences in practice. The new standard became effective for the Company as of April 1, 2018. Adoption is required to be on a retrospective basis, unless impracticable for any of the amendments, in which case a prospective application is permitted. The Company determined that the adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. |
| |
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net) (“ASU 2016-08”). ASU 2016-08 does not change the core principle of the guidance stated in ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), (“ASU 2014-9”), instead, the amendments in this ASU are intended to improve the operability and understandability of the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations and whether an entity reports revenue on a gross or net basis. ASU 2016-08 will have the same effective date and transition requirements as the new standard issued in ASU 2014-09. In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09. The new standard outlines a new, single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The new standard contains principles to determine the measurement of revenue and timing of when it is recognized. The guidance provides a five-step analysis of transactions to determine when and how revenue is recognized. Under the new model, recognition of revenue occurs when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In addition, the new standard requires that reporting companies disclose the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The Company adopted the new standard on April 1, 2018 by applying the modified retrospective method, which did not result in a transition adjustment nor an adjustment to opening retained earnings. The Company determined that the adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. |
| |
|
| |
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, “Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”, which amends the guidance in U.S. GAAP on the classification and measurement of financial instruments. Changes to the current guidance primarily affect the accounting for equity investments, financial liabilities under the fair value option, and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. Also, the ASU clarifies guidance related to the valuation allowance assessment when recognizing deferred tax assets resulting from unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt securities. The Company adopted the new standard on April 1, 2018, which did not result in a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet. The Company determined that the adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. |
|