v2.4.0.8
Commitments, Contingencies, and Concentrations
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2013
Commitments, Contingencies, and Concentrations [Abstract]  
Commitments, Contingencies, and Concentrations
(13)     Commitments, Contingencies, and Concentrations
 
Commitments
 
As of December 31, 2013, the Company had open purchase commitments totaling $194.2 million for sixty aircraft scheduled to be delivered from 2014 through 2017. Typically the Company has financed aircraft acquired under similar commitments through capital lease or debt agreements. If financing arrangements cannot be arranged or the Company is prevented from taking or declines to take delivery of the aircraft under the commitments described above for any other reason, the Company may forfeit nonrefundable deposits of approximately $18.3 million. The amount of deposit to be forfeited may be mitigated if the aircraft manufacturer is able to remarket the commitment positions. As of December 31, 2013, the Company has received financing commitments, subject to routine credit approval and aircraft inspection processes, to cover the cost of all aircraft scheduled to be delivered in 2014. The Company intends to use the new aircraft for expansion opportunities as well as to replace older models of aircraft in the fleet. The Company plans to either sell the aircraft which are replaced, use them for spare parts, or redeploy them into the backup fleet.
 
 
As of December 31, 2013, the Company had three letters of credit totaling $3,525,000 in lieu of cash deposits on workers compensation insurance policies and other obligations. All letters of credit may be renewed annually and reduce the available borrowing capacity under the Company’s revolving credit facility.
 
Contingencies
 
On January 30, 2013, the Company was served with a purported class action lawsuit, filed in the Superior Court of Alameda County, California, alleging failure to pay certain compensation and benefits to employees in that jurisdiction. The Company continues to evaluate the merits of the lawsuit and is vigorously defending against this suit. The Company has recorded a liability based on its assessment of potential outcomes. Adjustments to this liability, which may or may not be material, may be required as the case progresses.
 
The Company is involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, or liquidity.
  
Concentrations
 
 
As of December 31, 2013, Airbus Helicopters (Airbus) aircraft comprise 82% of the Company’s helicopter fleet while aircraft made by Bell Helicopter, Inc. (Bell) constitute 16%. The Company obtains a substantial portion of its helicopter spare parts and components from Airbus and Bell and maintains supply arrangements with other parties for engine and related dynamic components.
 
 
The Company’s air medical services pilots, comprising 28% of the total workforce, are represented by a collective bargaining unit. The collective bargaining agreement (CBA) between the Company and the pilots’ union expired in December 2013.
 
 
Payer mix related to the Company’s patient transport revenue, based on number of transports, was as follows for the years ended December 31:
 
   
2013
   
2012
 
Private insurance carriers
    33 %     35 %
Medicare
    33 %     31 %
Medicaid
    21 %     21 %
Self-pay patients
    13 %     13 %