v2.4.0.8

Commitments and Contingencies | 12 Months Ended
--- | ---
Apr. 30, 2014
Commitments and Contingencies | 16. Commitments and Contingencies Aggregate Future Lease Commitments The Company has non-cancelable operating leases for office space. The Company recognizes expense on a straight-line basis and records the difference between recognized rental expense and amounts payable under the lease as deferred rent. Future minimum lease payments, by year and in aggregate, under non-cancelable operating leases consist of the following as of April 30, 2014 (in thousands):
Fiscal year ended April 30, |  |  |  |
2015 |  | $ | 4,998 |
2016 |  |  | 3,567 |
2017 |  |  | 1,641 |
2018 |  |  | 1,067 |
2019 |  |  | — |
Thereafter |  |  | — |
|  | $ | 11,273 |
Rent expense for the years ended April 30, 2014, 2013 and 2012, was $4.4 million, $3.8 million and $1.7 million, respectively. Legal proceedings and other contingencies The Company reviews the status of each matter and records a provision for a liability when it is considered both probable that a liability has been incurred and that the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. These provisions are reviewed quarterly and adjusted as additional information becomes available. If either or both of the criteria are not met, the Company assesses whether there is at least a reasonable possibility that a loss, or additional losses, may be incurred. If there is a reasonable possibility that a loss may be incurred, the Company discloses the estimate of the amount of loss or range of losses, discloses that the amount would not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements (if applicable) or discloses that an estimate of the possible loss or range of loss cannot be made. Legal fees are recognized as incurred when the legal services are provided, and therefore are not recognized as a part of a loss contingency accrual. On June 12, 2012, the Company acquired PowerReviews, a provider of social commerce solutions based in San Francisco, California. PowerReviews’ solutions are offered through two platforms—a network platform that is similar to the Company’s Conversations platform and an express platform that provides certain ratings and reviews solutions as a turn-key offering. The total consideration paid for this transaction was $150.8 million, including the issuance of 6.4 million shares of the Company’s common stock and assumption of vested and unvested options to purchase the common stock of PowerReviews equivalent to options to purchase 1.7 million shares of the Company’s common stock, but excluding the potential cash proceeds that may arise from the exercise of these assumed options. On January 10, 2013, the DOJ filed a complaint against the Company with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division (the “Court”), alleging that the Company’s acquisition of PowerReviews violated Section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. Section 18 and seeking the Company’s divestiture of assets sufficient to create a competing business that can replace the competitive significance of PowerReviews in the marketplace. On January 8, 2014, the Court ruled that the Company’s acquisition of PowerReviews violated Section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. Section 18. On April 24, 2014, the Company entered into a Joint Stipulation with the DOJ to resolve the DOJ’s claims in the antitrust action challenging the acquisition of PowerReviews and, together with the DOJ, the Company submitted a proposed order to the Court. Under the terms of the Joint Stipulation and the proposed order, the Company is required to divest all of the assets of the PowerReviews business. On June 4, 2014, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to divest PowerReviews, LLC, the successor to PowerReviews, to Wavetable Labs, LLC (“Wavetable”) for $30.0 million in cash. This transaction remains subject to closing conditions set forth in the definitive agreement. While there can be no assurance that the proposed transaction with Wavetable will be completed, the transaction is expected to close within the first quarter of the Company’s 2015 fiscal year ending July 31, 2014, provided that the Company receive the necessary approvals, including the Court’s entry of the Proposed Final Judgment. On June 26, 2014, the DOJ approved the terms of the transaction. As a result, the Company has reported the results of operations and financial position of PowerReviews as discontinued operations within the consolidated statement of operations and the balance sheets for all periods presented. The Company recorded an estimated loss on disposal of discontinued operations of $9.2 million in fiscal year 2014; see Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of discontinued operations. On March 12, 2013, a purported shareholder derivative action was filed in the Texas State District Court for Travis County, Texas against certain of the Company’s officers and directors, former officers and directors, and against the Company as nominal defendant. The original petition in this matter alleged claims purportedly on behalf of the Company against the individual defendants for corporate waste, breaches of fiduciary duties and breaches of the Company’s corporate policies in connection with the acquisition of PowerReviews and certain of the Company’s officers’ and directors’ sales of shares of the Company’s stock. The original petition requested declaratory judgment, a disgorgement of $91.4 million in proceeds received from such sales of the Company’s stock, unspecified damages on behalf of the Company, reasonable attorneys’, accountants’ and experts’ fees, and equitable relief. On October 23, 2013, the court granted a motion filed by the Company and individual defendants and ruled that the plaintiff’s original petition failed to allege particularized facts sufficient to excuse plaintiff from making pre-suit demand on the Company’s Board of Directors. The court ordered the plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 30 days setting forth particularized facts sufficient to excuse demand. On November 22, 2013, the plaintiff filed its amended petition, which again asserted claims for corporate waste, breaches of fiduciary duties and breaches of the Company’s corporate policies in connection with the acquisition of PowerReviews and certain of the Company’s officers’ and directors’ sales of shares of the Company’s stock. The Company has filed a motion for summary judgment asserting that the amended petition has not cured the defects in the original petition. Plaintiff has opposed the motion, which remains pending before the court. Because the case is in its early stages, it is not possible to reliably predict the outcome of the case. Therefore, the Company cannot currently estimate the reasonably possible loss or range of loss that could result from the case. As of April 30, 2014, the Company was in the process of assessing the sales tax status of the Bazaarvoice enterprise service offering with sales tax agencies in certain states in which it operates. Based on the limited information received from certain of these states, the Company cannot estimate with certainty the historical time period for which these services were taxable, and, for certain states, which of its service offerings and features these states may determine to be subject to state sales tax. The Company currently estimates that its liability, net of amounts to be recovered from clients, will be between $2.5 million and $3.2 million. The Company has accrued a liability of $3.0 million, representing the best estimate of the amount within this range that will probably be incurred to settle these obligations. The estimated range includes continuing to execute its action plan for recovering these amounts due from the Company’s clients. If it is determined that the time period in which the products are taxable or the portion of the Company’s product offering subject to state sales tax is greater than that used to determine the accrual as of April 30, 2014, or if there are changes in our underlying assumptions, then the actual liability incurred will likely approach the higher end of the current estimated range.

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for commitments and contingencies. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 210 -SubTopic 10 -Section S99 -Paragraph 1 -Subparagraph (SX 210.5-02.25) -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6877327&loc=d3e13212-122682 Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 825 -SubTopic 20 -Section 50 -Paragraph 1 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6449706&loc=d3e16207-108621 Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 460 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 8 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6398077&loc=d3e12565-110249 Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 450 -SubTopic 20 -Section 50 -Paragraph 4 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=25496072&loc=d3e14435-108349 Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 440 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 2 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6394976&loc=d3e25287-109308 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration