| x |
Preliminary
Proxy Statement
|
| o |
Confidential,
for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
14a-6(e)(2))
|
| o |
Definitive
Proxy Statement
|
| o |
Definitive
Additional Materials
|
| o |
Soliciting
Materials Pursuant to § 240.14a-11(c) or
§ 240.14a-12
|
|
o
|
No
fee required
|
||
|
o
|
Fee
computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and
0-11
|
||
|
(1)
|
Title
of each class of securities to which transaction
applies:
|
||
|
(2)
|
Aggregate
number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
||
|
(3)
|
Per
unit price or other underlying value of transaction
computed
|
||
|
pursuant
to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on
which
|
|||
|
the
filing fee is calculated and state how it was
determined):
|
|||
|
(4)
|
Proposed
maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
||
|
(5)
|
Total
Fee paid:
|
||
|
x
|
Fee
paid previously
|
||
|
x
|
Check
box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee
was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its
filing.
|
||
|
(1)
|
Amount
previously paid:
|
$3,087.00
|
|
(2)
|
Form,
Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
Schedule
14A
|
|
(3)
|
Filing
Party:
|
Central
Freight Lines, Inc.
|
|
(4)
|
Date
Filed:
|
April
17, 2006
|
|
Sincerely,
|
|
|
Robert
V. Fasso
|
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer and
President
|
|
1.
|
APPROVAL
OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT. To consider and vote upon a proposal to
approve
the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of January 30, 2006 (the
“Merger Agreement”), by and among Central, North American Truck Lines, LLC
(“NATL”) and Green Acquisition Company (“Green”), which agreement provides
for the merger of Green, a wholly-owned subsidiary of NATL, with
and into
Central with Central as the surviving corporation in the merger (the
“Merger”);
|
|
2.
|
ADJOURNMENT.
To approve the adjournment of the Annual Meeting, if necessary or
appropriate, to provide time to solicit additional proxies if it
does not
appear that there will be enough shares voted in favor of the Merger
Agreement to approve it at the time of the Annual
Meeting;
|
|
3.
|
ELECTION
OF DIRECTORS. To consider and act upon a proposal to elect four directors
of Central; and
|
|
4.
|
OTHER
MATTERS. To consider and act upon such other matters as may properly
come
before the Annual Meeting and any adjournment
thereof.
|
|
By
Order of the Board of Directors,
|
|
|
Jeffrey
A. Hale
|
|
|
Secretary
|
|
|
Waco,
Texas
|
|
|
_______
___, 2006
|
|
SUMMARY
TERM SHEET
|
||
|
The
Merger and Related Transactions
|
||
|
Effects
of the Merger and Related Transactions
|
||
|
Recommendation
of our Board
|
||
|
Factors
Considered by the Board and the Special Committee
|
||
|
Morgan
Keegan's Fairness Opinion
|
||
|
Position
of NATL, Green Mr. Fasso and the Affiliated Continuing Investors
Regarding
the Merger
|
||
|
Conflicts
of Interest and Other Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger
and
Certain Relationships
|
||
|
U.S.
Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger
|
||
|
Central’s
Stockholders Must Approve the Merger Agreement
|
||
|
Regulatory
Approvals Related to the Merger
|
||
|
Source
and Amount of Funds
|
||
|
The
Merger Consideration
|
||
|
Conditions
to Completion of the Merger
|
||
|
Certain
Stockholder Litigation Currently Pending Against Central
|
||
|
Termination
of the Merger Agreement and Non-Solicitation
|
||
|
GENERAL
INFORMATION
|
||
|
Time,
Place and Date
|
||
|
Proxies
and Voting
|
||
|
Right
to Attend Annual Meeting; Revocation of Proxy
|
||
|
Costs
of Solicitation
|
||
|
Annual
Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
|
||
|
How
To Read This Proxy Statement
|
||
|
QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER AND THE ANNUAL MEETING OF
STOCKHOLDERS
|
||
|
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
|
||
|
PROPOSAL
ONE - APPROVAL OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT
|
||
|
THE
PARTIES TO THE MERGER AGREEMENT
|
||
|
Central
Freight Lines, Inc.
|
||
|
North
American Truck Lines, LLC
|
||
|
Green
Acquisition Company
|
||
|
Relationships
Between Central and NATL
|
||
|
SPECIAL
FACTORS
|
||
|
Background
of the Merger
|
||
|
Litigation
|
||
|
Reasons
for the Merger
|
||
|
Recommendation
of our Board and Fairness of the Merger
|
||
|
Opinion
of Central’s Financial Advisor
|
||
|
|
Position
of NATL, Green, Mr. Fasso and the Affiliated Continuing Investores
Regarding the Merger
|
|
|
Conduct
of Central’s Business if the Merger is Not Completed
|
||
|
Conflicts
of Interest and Other Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger
and
Certain Relationships
|
||
|
Agreement
with the Affiliates
|
||
|
Accounting
Treatment
|
||
|
Regulatory
Requirements
|
||
|
Net
Operating Loss Carryforwards
|
||
|
U.S.
Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger
|
||
|
Fees
and Expenses
|
||
|
Source
and Amount of Funds
|
||
|
THE
MERGER AGREEMENT
|
||
|
The
Merger
|
||
|
Conversion
of Securities
|
||
|
Stock
Options
|
||
|
Exchange
of Certificates
|
||
|
Articles
of Incorporation and By-Laws; Directors and Officers
|
||
|
Representations
and Warranties
|
||
|
Covenants
Relating to the Conduct of Central’s Business
|
||
|
Other
Covenants
|
||
|
Restrictions
on Negotiating and Entering into Alternative Transactions and on
Withdrawing the Recommendation with Respect to the Merger
|
||
|
Covenants
Regarding Stockholder Meeting
|
||
|
Directors’
and Officers’ Insurance and Indemnification
|
||
|
Indemnification
of NATL, Green and Their Respective Controlling Persons, Directors,
Officers, Employees and Agents
|
||
|
Conditions
Precedent to the Merger
|
||
|
Termination
of the Merger Agreement; Termination Fees and Expenses
|
||
|
CENTRAL
FREIGHT LINES, INC. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
|
||
|
MARKET
FOR THE COMMON STOCK
|
||
|
SECURITIES
OWNERSHIP
|
||
|
CONTROLLING
PERSONS, DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF CENTRAL, NATL AND
GREEN
|
||
|
Background
of Named Persons
|
||
|
Past
Contacts, Transactions and Negotiations
|
||
|
Plans
or Proposals
|
||
|
Recent
Transactions in Central Common Stock
|
||
|
Contracts,
Arrangements or Understandings Concerning Central’s
Securities
|
||
|
PROPOSAL
TWO - GRANTING OF PROXY TO ADJOURN THE ANNUAL MEETING
|
||
|
PROPOSAL
THREE - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
|
||
| CORPORATE GOVERNANCE | ||
|
Board
of Directors
|
||
|
Committees
of the Board
|
||
|
The
Audit Committee
|
||
|
Report
of the Audit Committee
|
|
The
Compensation Committee
|
||
|
The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
|
||
|
The
Special Committee
|
||
|
Director
Compensation
|
||
|
Executive
Officers of Central
|
||
|
Code
of Conduct and Ethics
|
||
|
Section
16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
|
||
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
||
|
Summary
Compensation Table
|
||
|
Options
Grants In Last Fiscal Year
|
||
|
Aggregated
Options Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year-End Option
Value
Table
|
||
|
Employment
Agreements
|
||
|
Executive
Bonus Program
|
||
|
Incentive
Stock Plan
|
||
|
401(k)
Profit Sharing Plan
|
||
|
Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
|
||
|
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
|
||
|
Compensation
Committee Report on Executive Compensation
|
||
|
Stock
Performance Graph
|
||
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
|
||
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
|
||
|
RELATIONSHIP
WITH INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
|
||
|
Change
in Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
||
|
Principal
Accounting Fees and Services
|
||
|
Pre-Approval
Policy
|
||
|
OTHER
MATTERS
|
||
|
STOCKHOLDER
PROPOSALS
|
||
|
INCORPORATION
BY REFERENCE
|
||
|
WHERE
YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
|
||
|
ANNEX A—
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER BY AND AMONG CENTRAL FREIGHT LINES,
INC.,
NORTH AMERICAN TRUCK LINES, LLC AND
GREEN
ACQUISITION COMPANY dated as of January 30, 2006
|
|
ANNEX B—
MORGAN KEEGAN & COMPANY, INC. FAIRNESS OPINION dated January 30,
2006
|
|
Ownership
Prior to the Merger
|
Ownership
After the Merger
|
|||||
|
Stockholder
|
Percent
Ownership
of
Common
Stock
April
1, 2006
|
Portion
of Net
Book
Value as of
April
1, 2006
|
Portion
of Net
Losses
in the
Quarter
ended
April
1, 2006
|
Percent
Ownership
of
the Surviving Corporation
Equity
April
1, 2006
|
Portion
of Net
Book
Value as of
April
1, 2006
|
Portion
of Net
Losses
in the
Quarter
ended
April
1, 2006
|
|
(dollars
in thousands)
|
||||||
|
Public
Stockholders
|
64.4%
|
$
24,585
|
$
6,660
|
0.0%
|
$
0
|
$
0
|
|
Affiliated
Continuing Investors:
|
||||||
|
Jerry
Moyes
|
0.0%
|
$
0
|
$ 0
|
___._%
|
$_____
|
$_____
|
|
The
Family Trust
|
5.7%
|
$
2,176
|
$
589
|
___._%
|
$_____
|
$_____
|
|
NATL
|
0.0%
|
$
0
|
$
0
|
___._%
|
$_____
|
$_____
|
|
The
Children’s Trust
|
25.7%
|
$
9,811
|
$
2,658
|
___._%
|
$_____
|
$_____
|
|
Robert
V. Fasso
|
4.1%
|
$
1,565
|
$
424
|
_____._%(1)
|
$_____(1)
|
$_____(1)
|
|
All
Directors and Executive Officers as a Group other than Mr.
Fasso
|
0.4%
|
$
153
|
$ 41
|
0.0%
|
$
0
|
$
0
|
|
(1)
|
Mr.
Fasso will be able to purchase up to ___% of the common stock of
the
surviving corporation after the Merger pursuant to his amended stock
options on terms currently being
negotiated.
|
|
•
|
As
a result of the Merger, Mr. Moyes, directly or indirectly through
NATL,
will acquire control of Central, holding __% of Central Common Stock.
Affiliated Continuing Investors and the Children’s Trust will continue to
hold their shares of Central, which will aggregate __ % of the Central
Common Stock and voting interest of Central and will not receive
any other
consideration for their shares or
options.
|
|
•
|
Each
holder of options to purchase Central Common Stock with an exercise
price
below $2.25 (other than Mr. Moyes and Mr. Fasso), including each
director and executive officer of
Central.
|
|
•
|
will
be entitled to receive in cash the difference between the exercise
price
and $2.25 multiplied by the number of shares of Common Stock subject
to
that option. Holders of options with an exercise price above or equal
to
$2.25 will be entitled to receive $0.01 multiplied by the number
of shares
of Common Stock subject to that option. Stock options owned by Mr.
Moyes
will be cancelled at the effective time of the
Merger.
|
|
•
|
Pursuant
to the Merger Agreement, Mr. Fasso will receive the merger consideration
for Central Common Stock he beneficially owns.
|
|
•
|
Mr.
Fasso may hold up to 2.7% of the Common Stock and voting interest
of the
surviving corporation if
he exercises his stock options as amended at a cost of $________
per share
($_________ in the aggregate).
It
is a condition to NATL’s obligation to consummate the transactions
anticipated by the Merger Agreement that, immediately prior to closing
of
the Merger, Mr. Fasso will execute and deliver: (i) a
Subscription Agreement
that will govern his investment in Central immediately after the
closing
of the Merger in
exchange for shares of Central Common Stock;
and (ii) a Stockholders’ Agreement that will govern the rights of Mr.
Fasso, the Children’s Trust and the Affiliated Continuing Investors upon
the consummation of the Merger.
|
|
•
|
Other
members of Central’s management are not expected to hold any equity
interest in the surviving corporation.
|
|
•
|
Central’s
directors and executive officers will continue to have rights to
indemnification and liability insurance coverage for six years following
the Merger.
|
|
•
|
The
payment of $30,000 to the Chairman of the Special Committee in recognition
of the time and effort he expended in evaluating the Merger and
negotiating the Merger Agreement, which amount was authorized by
the
Board.
|
|
•
|
It
is expected that all of Central’s executive officers will continue to be
employed by Central following the Merger. See the section of this
Proxy
Statement entitled “Special Factors—Conflicts of Interest and Other
Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger and Certain
Relationships.”
|
|
•
|
the
Merger Agreement is approved by the affirmative vote of the holders
of a
majority of the outstanding shares of Central Common Stock and the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding
shares
beneficially held by the Public Stockholders;
|
|
•
|
NATL
must have obtained financing in an amount sufficient to pay the merger
consideration and all fees and expenses related to the consummation
of the
transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement;
|
|
•
|
Mr. Fasso
must have executed and delivered to Central each of the Subscription
Agreement and Stockholders’ Agreement; and
|
|
•
|
All
conditions precedent in the Subscription
Agreement in favor of Central, as the surviving corporation, shall
have
been satisfied.
|
|
Q:
|
What
is the date, time and place of the annual
meeting?
|
|
A:
|
The
Annual Meeting will be held at 1:00 P.M., Phoenix time, on _____
___,
2006, at __________________________________.
|
|
Q:
|
What
are the proposals that I will be voting
on?
|
|
A:
|
You
are being asked to vote on the following
proposals:
|
|
○
|
to
approve the Merger Agreement;
|
|
○
|
to
approve the adjournment of the Annual Meeting, if necessary or
appropriate, to provide time to solicit additional proxies if there
are
not enough shares voted in favor of the Merger Agreement to approve
it at
the time of the Annual Meeting; and
|
|
○
|
to
elect four directors to our Board.
|
|
Q:
|
Who
is entitled to vote at the
meeting?
|
|
A:
|
All
stockholders of record as of the close of business on ______________
may
vote. You are entitled to one vote per share of Central Common Stock
that
you owned on the record date on each item of business to be considered
at
the Annual Meeting.
|
|
Q:
|
How
does our board of directors recommend that I
vote?
|
|
○
|
“FOR” the
proposal to approve the Merger Agreement;
|
|
○
|
“FOR”
the adjournment of the Annual Meeting, if necessary;
and
|
|
○
|
“FOR” each
of the four director nominees.
|
|
Q:
|
What
vote of our stockholders is required to approve the
proposals?
|
|
A:
|
The
vote requirements to approve the proposals are as
follows:
|
|
○
|
The
proposal to approve the Merger Agreement requires the affirmative
vote of
both (i) the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of
Central Common Stock entitled to vote thereon (i.e., the “Statutory Vote”)
and (ii) a majority of the outstanding shares of Central Common Stock
beneficially owned by holders other than the Affiliated Continuing
Investors, Mr. Fasso
and the Children’s Trust (the
i.e., “Public Stockholder Vote”).
|
|
○
|
The
proposal to adjourn the Annual Meeting, if necessary, to provide
time to
solicit additional proxies if it does not appear that there will
be enough
shares voted in favor of the Merger Agreement to approve it at the
time of
the Annual Meeting, requires the affirmative vote of a majority of
the
shares then present at the meeting.
|
|
○
|
The
election of directors is by a plurality of the votes
cast.
|
|
Q:
|
Is
the Board recommending that I vote for the Merger
Agreement?
|
|
A:
|
Yes,
the Board recommends unanimously that you vote for the Merger
Agreement.
|
|
Q:
|
Why
is the Board recommending that I vote for the Merger
Agreement?
|
|
A:
|
After
considering the recommendation for approval of the Merger Agreement
by the
Special Committee as well as the opinion of Morgan Keegan as to the
financial fairness of the merger consideration to be received by
the
Unaffiliated Security Holders, our Board has concluded that the terms
of
the Merger Agreement are advisable, fair to and in the best interests
of
the Unaffiliated Security Holders.
|
|
Q:
|
What
will I receive in the
Merger?
|
|
A:
|
In
the Merger, each issued and outstanding share of Central Common Stock
(other than shares held by the Affiliated Continuing Investors and
the
Children’s Trust) will be converted into the right to receive the merger
consideration of $2.25 per share in cash, without interest. Each
issued
and outstanding share of Green common stock shall be converted into
the
number of issued and outstanding shares of the surviving corporation
equal
to the quotient obtained by dividing (i) the difference between (A)
all of
the issued and outstanding shares of Central Common Stock immediately
prior to the effective time of the Merger and (B) the number of shares
of
Central Common Stock held by the Affiliated Continuing Investors
and the
Children’s Trust, by (ii) the number of issued and outstanding shares of
Green common stock immediately prior to the effective time of the
Merger.
Each holder of options to purchase Central Common Stock with an exercise
price below $2.25 (other than Mr. Moyes and Mr. Fasso),
including each director and executive officer of Central, will receive
in
cash the difference between the exercise price and $2.25 multiplied
by the
number of shares of Common Stock subject to that option in consideration
for the cancellation of that option. Each holder of options with
an
exercise price equal to or greater than $2.25, including directors
and
executive officers of Central, will receive $0.01 multiplied by the
number
of shares subject to that option in consideration for the cancellation
of
that option.
|
|
Q:
|
Will
the Affiliated Continuing Investors and the Children’s Trust be paid for
their shares?
|
|
A:
|
The
Continuing Affiliated Investors’ shares and the Children’s Trust’s shares
will remain issued and outstanding without payment when the Merger
is
completed.
|
|
Q:
|
What
will happen to Central after the
Merger?
|
|
A:
|
Central
will continue to exist after the Merger, but will no longer be a
public
company and will no longer have shares traded on the Nasdaq National
Market (“Nasdaq”).
|
|
Q:
|
Who
will continue as stockholders of
Central?
|
|
A:
|
The
Affiliated Continuing Investors and the Children’s Trust will continue as
stockholders of Central. Mr. Fasso, although receiving the merger
consideration in exchange for his shares of Central Common Stock,
will be
allowed to purchase shares of the surviving corporation after consummation
of the Merger using his existing stock options as revised pursuant
to his
negotiations with Mr. Moyes. NATL’s holdings of Green Common Stock will be
converted into Central Common Stock pursuant to the terms of the
Merger
Agreement.
|
|
Q:
|
What
will happen to the directors who are up for election if the Merger
Agreement is approved?
|
|
A:
|
If
the Merger Agreement is approved by our stockholders and the Merger
is
completed, each of our directors elected at the Annual Meeting will
serve
until the effective time of the Merger. Immediately prior to the
closing
of the Merger, Central will deliver to NATL the notices of resignation
of
each of its then-current directors, and each such resignation will
be
effective as of the effective time of the Merger. Under the terms
of the
Merger Agreement, the directors of Green will become the directors
of
Central as the surviving corporation in the
Merger.
|
|
Q:
|
What
if the Merger is not
completed?
|
|
A:
|
It
is possible the Merger will not be completed. That might happen if,
for
example, Central’s stockholders do not approve the Merger Agreement. In
this event, Central will continue to be a publicly traded company
listed
on Nasdaq until further action is
taken.
|
|
Q:
|
What
do I need to do now?
|
|
A:
|
After
you read and carefully consider the information contained in this
Proxy
Statement, please fill out, sign and date your proxy card and mail
it in
the enclosed return envelope as soon as possible, so that your shares
will
be represented at the Annual
Meeting.
|
|
Q:
|
How
are votes counted?
|
|
A:
|
For
the proposal relating to the approval of the Merger Agreement, you
may
vote “FOR,”
“AGAINST”
or “ABSTAIN.”
If you “ABSTAIN,”
it has the same effect as if you vote “AGAINST”
the approval of the Merger Agreement with respect to both (i) the
Statutory Vote and (ii) the Public Stockholder Vote. Likewise, broker
non-votes will be counted as votes against the approval of the Merger
Agreement. Abstentions and broker non-votes will count for the purpose
of
determining whether a quorum is present. See “General Information—Proxies
and Voting” for a discussion of broker
non-votes.
|
|
Q:
|
If
my shares are held in “street name” by my broker, will my broker vote my
shares for me?
|
|
A:
|
Your
broker will vote your shares with respect to the proposal to approve
the
Merger Agreement only if you provide instructions on how to vote.
You
should follow the directions provided by your broker regarding how
to
instruct your broker to vote your shares. Brokers who do not receive
instructions
|
|
|
regarding
how to vote with respect to the election of directors or the adjournment
of the Annual Meeting may vote the uninstructed shares according
to their
discretion.
|
|
Q:
|
How
many shares must be present or represented at the Annual Meeting
in order
to conduct business?
|
|
A:
|
A
quorum of stockholders is necessary to hold a valid Annual Meeting,
provided that a vote may be taken to adjourn the meeting even if
a quorum
is not then present. A quorum is present at the Annual Meeting if
a
majority of the shares of Central Common Stock entitled to vote on
the
record date are present in person or represented by proxy. Withheld
votes,
abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present for the purposes
of determining whether a quorum is
present.
|
|
Q:
|
Should
I send in my stock certificates
now?
|
|
A:
|
No.
If the Merger is completed, you will receive written instructions
for
exchanging your stock certificates.
|
|
Q:
|
May
I change my vote?
|
|
A:
|
Yes.
If you hold your shares in your own name, just send to Central’s Secretary
a written revocation notice or a later-dated, signed proxy card before
the
Annual Meeting or attend the Annual Meeting and vote. If your shares
are
held in “street name,” you should follow the directions provided by your
broker regarding how to change your
vote.
|
|
Q:
|
Am
I entitled to appraisal or dissenters’
rights?
|
|
A:
|
Under
Chapter 92A of the Nevada Revised Statutes, you are not entitled
to any
dissenters’ rights with respect to the
Merger.
|
|
Q:
|
What
are the tax consequences of the Merger to
me?
|
|
A:
|
Receipt
of the merger consideration by the Public Stockholders generally
will be a
taxable transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes and possibly
for
state, local and foreign tax purposes as well. To review the tax
consequences in greater detail, see the section of this Proxy Statement
entitled “Special
Factors—U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger.”
The
tax consequences of the Merger to the Public Stockholders will depend
on
their own respective financial and tax situations. The Public Stockholders
should consult with their respective tax and legal advisors for a
full
understanding of the tax consequences of the Merger to
them.
|
|
Q:
|
When
do you expect the Merger to be
completed?
|
|
A:
|
It
is expected that the Merger will be completed as soon as possible
after
the Annual Meeting, subject to the approval of Central’s stockholders and
the satisfaction or waiver of the other conditions contained in the
Merger
Agreement. However, we cannot predict exactly when these conditions
will
be satisfied.
|
|
Q:
|
When
will I receive the cash consideration for my shares of Central Common
Stock?
|
|
A:
|
After
the Merger is completed, Public Stockholders and Mr. Fasso will
receive written instructions, including a letter of transmittal,
that
explain how to exchange their shares for the cash consideration paid
in
the Merger. When Public Stockholders and Mr. Fasso properly complete
and return the required
|
|
|
documentation
described in the written instructions, they will promptly receive
from the
paying agent a payment of cash consideration for their
shares.
|
|
Q:
|
What
else will happen at the Annual
Meeting?
|
|
A:
|
The
Board does not intend to present at the Annual Meeting any matters
other
than those described herein and does not presently know of any matters
that will be presented by other parties although it is possible that
a
holder of Central Common Stock may attempt to introduce a matter
for
stockholder vote at the Annual
Meeting.
|
|
Q:
|
What
happens if I sell my shares of Central Common Stock before the Annual
Meeting?
|
|
A:
|
The
Record Date for the Annual Meeting is earlier than the date of the
Annual
Meeting and the date that the Merger is expected to be completed.
If you
transfer your shares of Central Common Stock after the Record Date
but
before the Annual Meeting, you will retain your right to vote at
the
Annual Meeting, but will have transferred the right to receive the
cash
consideration to be received by our stockholders in the
Merger.
|
|
Q:
|
Who
can help answer my
questions?
|
|
A:
|
If
you have questions about the Merger, need additional copies of this
Proxy
Statement or have any questions about Central’s operations, please call
Jeff Hale, Central’s Chief Financial Officer, at (480)
361-5295.
|
|
•
|
Reducing
the amount of public information available to competitors regarding
Central’s business and strategy by terminating Central’s reporting
obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the
“Exchange Act”).
|
|
•
|
Eliminating
other burdens on Central’s management and sales force related to Central’s
public company status, including, for example, the dedication of
time and
resources necessary to respond to stockholder and analyst inquiries
and to
maintain investor and customer relations in the face of analyst,
stockholder and competitor speculation.
|
|
•
|
Eliminating
costs associated with being a public company, including professional
fees
associated with filing quarterly, annual and other periodic reports
with
the SEC, the substantial internal and external costs of compliance
with
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the expense of publishing and distributing
annual reports and proxy statements to stockholders and the costs
of
compensating independent directors. The Company estimates that it
incurred
approximately $1.9 million and $3.3 million of public company costs
in
2004 and 2005, respectively, including approximately $150,000 in
internal
labor costs in each year.
|
|
•
|
Increasing
the ability of Central’s management to focus on long-term business goals,
as a non-reporting company, rather than short-term expectations and
speculation.
|
|
•
|
The
belief that a premium over the market price of Central Common Stock
for
our stockholders could be
negotiated.
|
|
•
|
The
continuing challenges faced by Central in working with its consultants
and
accountants to respond to the internal controls requirements imposed
by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002;
|
|
•
|
The
recent need for Central's junior- and senior-level management to
spend
significant amounts of time addressing customer and employee concerns
regarding Central's financial position following adverse analyst
reports
that questioned Central's ability to continue as an independent public
company; and
|
|
•
|
The
negative impact the foregoing had on management's ability to implement
its
turnaround plan and improve results of
operations.
|
|
·
|
The
process conducted under the direction of the Special Committee was
a
factor in the determination by the Special Committee and our Board
that
the Merger Agreement is fair to the Unaffiliated Security Holders
and in
their best interests and it consisted of the following
steps.
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
°
|
Morgan
Keegan contacted six strategic buyers regarding a potential acquisition
of
Central prior to the receipt of the proposal from NATL on
November 10, 2005. We issued a press release on November 10,
2005 announcing NATL’s proposal and our engagement of Morgan Keegan as
financial advisor to the Special Committee, which gave other parties
ample
opportunity to explore possible transactions with Central and which
would
have given Central alternative transactions to consider in addition
to
NATL’s proposal.
|
|
|
||
|
|
°
|
Three
parties contacted Central’s management expressing an interest in
considering an alternative proposal. After the expiration of the
Exclusivity Period with NATL, Morgan Keegan and management of Central
contacted these three interested parties as well as the strategic
buyers
it had contacted prior to receiving NATL’s proposal and one other
potential strategic buyer who we thought might be interested in Central.
Only one of these parties expressed sufficient interest to warrant
a
non-disclosure agreement to be executed to provide further information
on
Central to explore a possible transaction with us, which did not
lead to
an alternative proposal.
|
|
·
|
The
$2.25 per share offer by NATL to our stockholders was the only
offer
received even though Central, through it own efforts and the efforts
of
Morgan Keegan, had made other potential buyers aware of the opportunity
to
acquire Central. Fair value is a function of what buyers are willing
to
pay.
|
|
|
·
|
The
fact that NATL’s offer will be paid in cash provides relative certainty,
immediate value and liquidity to our
stockholders.
|
|
|
·
|
The
premium represented by $2.25 per share in cash to be paid to our
stockholders contrasted with the current and historical trading
prices of
shares of Central Common Stock contributed to the conclusion by
the
Special Committee and our Board that the $2.25 per share offer
is fair to
the Unaffiliated Security Holders. See “Special Factors—Opinion of
Central’s Financial Advisor.”
|
|
|
○
|
The
premiums to our stock price of 5.8% to our average closing prices
over the
thirty trading days prior to the day we announced our receipt of
the
proposal (after the close of the market) and 26.9% to our average
closing
price over the thirty trading days prior to the date we announced
entry
into the Merger Agreement, figured prominently in the determination
of the
Special Committee and the Board that the $2.25 per share offer
is fair to
the Unaffiliated Security Holders, due to the fact that these closing
prices reflect the market values of our stock prior to the material
disclosures represented by the receipt of NATL’s proposal and execution of
the Merger Agreement.
|
|
|
○
|
The
premium to our closing stock price of $__ on _______, 2006 is ____%.
|
|
|
○
|
Further,
the conclusion by the Special Committee and the Board was predicated,
in
part, on the belief of the members that absent a transaction with
NATL,
there is a significant risk that the Company’s stock price could decline
below current levels based on continuing losses.
|
|
|
○
|
We
discounted historical trading prices of our Common Stock in light
of the
ongoing losses over the last two years resulting in the declining
stock
prices over this period.
|
|
|
·
|
The
information contained in the financial analyses presented by Morgan
Keegan
at the Special Committee meetings on January 5, 2006 and
January 21, 2006, and at our Board meetings on January 21 and
26, 2006, supported the conclusion by the Special Committee and
our Board
that the $2.25 per share offer is fair to the Unaffiliated Security
Holders.
|
|
|
·
|
Morgan
Keegan’s opinion dated January 30, 2006 that, as of that date and
based upon and subject to the considerations set forth in its opinion,
the
$2.25 per share in cash to be received by our Public Stockholders
was
fair, from a financial point of view, to such stockholders contributed
to
the conclusion by the Special Committee and our Board that the
$2.25 per
share offer is fair to the Unaffiliated Security Holders. See “Special
Factors—Opinion of Central’s Financial Advisor.”
|
|
|
·
|
The
Special Committee and the Board noted that a number of factors
specific to
the situation facing Central make the financial metrics for the
traditional evaluation of fairness more speculative in assessing
the
fairness of the merger consideration to the Unaffiliated Security
Holders.
These factors include the following.
|
|
|
○
|
Central’s
significant operating losses over the last two years which has
caused a
steady decline in Central’s book value and stock price and which decline
management currently estimates will continue into the foreseeable
future
makes the evaluation of the fairness of the $2.25 per share more
speculative.
|
|
|
○
|
Central’s
negative cash flow and negative working capital makes more difficult
the
evaluation of Central’s going-concern value.
|
|
|
○
|
The
lack of comparability with peers in this industry.
|
|
|
○
|
The
likelihood that after the $2.25 price agreed to by NATL was publicly
announced, Central’s stock traded at artificially higher prices than it
otherwise would have if the price were based on traditional market
fundamentals.
|
|
|
○
|
The
amount of Central Common Stock controlled by Mr. Moyes and the Children’s
Trust and Central’s lease arrangements with Southwest Premier and Mr.
Moyes for a number of key terminals in Central's core Southwest
region.
|
|
·
|
The
factors set forth below relating to the adverse business, market
and
execution risks that we face in operating our business and pursuing
growth
were considered by and contributed to the conclusion of the Special
Committee and our Board that the $2.25 per share offer is fair to
the
Unaffiliated Security Holders. These factors include the
following.
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
○
|
The
obstacles to successfully execute a turnaround plan to improve our
operating results have hampered our effort to stop the continued
decline
in the market value of Central Common Stock. The Merger would prevent
the
Public Stockholders from losing up to their entire investment in
Central
in the event that it is unable to continue as a going
concern.
|
|
|
||
|
|
○
|
Our
inability to generate increased business contributed to the decline
in
revenues and cash flow, further contributing to the decline in the
market
value of Central Common Stock. Without additional sources of liquidity,
we
have been unable to address these issues as aggressively as we wished.
In
addition, the need for liquidity may have contributed to a lack of
competing offers.
|
|
|
||
|
|
○
|
Our
unwillingness to operate at unprofitable rates for some of our former
customers, such as Dell Inc., has resulted in a decline in revenue,
further contributing to the decline in the market value of Central
Common
Stock.
|
|
|
||
|
|
○
|
Speculation
within the trucking industry regarding our liquidity and financial
position coupled with the efforts of our competitors to capitalize
on that
speculation has generated a lack of confidence among our customers
and
potential customers that we will be able to continue to serve them,
further contributing to the decline in the market value of Central
Common
Stock.
|
|
|
||
|
|
○
|
Uncertainty
over our ability to stop the erosion of our book value, which management
currently believes will continue into the foreseeable future is
contributing to the decline in the market value of Central Common
Stock.
|
|
|
||
|
|
○
|
Continued
significant costs of regulatory compliance facing small public companies
like us contributed to the decline in the market value of Central
Common
Stock.
|
|
·
|
In
addition to the foregoing, additional factors increase the challenges
we
would face if we remained an independent company and contributed
to the
conclusion by the Special Committee and our Board that the $2.25
per share
offer is fair to the Unaffiliated Security Holders. These factors
include
the following.
|
|
|
|
○
|
The
Special Committee and our Board believe that the amount of Common
Stock
controlled by Mr. Moyes and the Children’s Trust coupled with
Central’s lease arrangements with Southwest Premier and Mr. Moyes for many
key terminals in Central’s core Southwest region has dampened the interest
that any third parties may have in Central.
|
|
|
||
|
|
○
|
The
risk that if the Merger is not consummated, members of our management
team
and key employees would ultimately terminate their employment with
us and
seek alternative employment with companies
|
|
|
|
with
higher growth rates, better potential financial returns and better
employment terms and career opportunities, which would further complicate
our ability to execute our turnaround
plans.
|
|
|
||
|
|
○
|
The
risk that if the Merger is not consummated, the significant general
and
administrative costs of remaining a publicly traded company as a
percentage of our other costs, continuing to divert scarce resources
to
non-revenue generating activities and further adversely impacting
Central’s ability to continue to operate, would negatively affect our
value.
|
|
|
||
|
|
○
|
Difficulties
in achieving growth through acquisition and further adversely impacting
Central’s ultimate goal of operating profitably would continue to cause
the market value of Central Common Stock to decline.
|
|
|
||
|
|
○
|
Our
inability to increase liquidity to improve our cash position pursuant
to
our operations may require additional capital infusions. Even if
Central
were able to obtain capital from other third parties, the terms Central
would have to offer could have an adverse impact on our stock price
and
may further dilute our stockholders’ equity positions.
|
|
|
||
|
|
○
|
The
fact that the Special Committee and our Board believe that NATL has
both
the motivation and the ability to obtain the financing necessary
to
consummate the Merger.
|
|
•
|
The
consideration by our Board and Special Committee of the terms of
the
Merger Agreement, by themselves and in comparison to the terms of
agreements in other similar transactions, contributed to the conclusion
by
the Special Committee and our Board that NATL’s proposal is fair to the
Unaffiliated Security Holders. These terms include the
following.
|
|
|
○
|
The
right of our Board under certain circumstances described below and
in the
Merger Agreement, in connection with the discharge of its fiduciary
duties
to our stockholders, to consider unsolicited acquisition proposals,
to
change its recommendation with respect to the Merger and to terminate
the
Merger Agreement, should we receive an unsolicited proposal that
our Board
or Special Committee determines to be a superior offer.
|
|
|
○
|
The
fact that the Merger Agreement included, as a condition to each party’s
obligations to complete the Merger, a requirement that the Merger
Agreement be approved by a majority of the voting power of the shares
of
our Common Stock held by the Public Stockholders, which gives our
Public
Stockholders the right to approve or disapprove of the Merger and
which
allows the Unaffiliated Security Holders to determine their own destiny
pursuant to the Public Stockholder Vote condition in the Merger
Agreement.
|
|
|
·
|
The
fact that our Board established a Special Committee of independent
directors that considered and approved the transaction while focusing
on
the interests of the Unaffiliated Security
Holders.
|
|
·
|
The
fact that, as discussed above, the Merger Agreement must be approved
by a
majority of the voting power of the shares of our Common Stock
voting on
the proposal that are owned by the Public Stockholders, which
serves as a
check on the decision of the Special Committee and our Board
to enter the
Merger Agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
The
fact that a nationally recognized law firm with no prior relationship
with
Central was retained as the legal advisor to advise the Special Committee
with respect to the Merger was designed to keep the focus on the
interests
of the Unaffiliated Security Holders.
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
The
fact that the Special Committee actively provided instructions to
its
legal and financial advisors regarding the negotiation of the terms
of the
Merger Agreement, including with respect to negotiating the amount
of the
merger consideration reflects that it took its responsibilities
seriously.
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
The
fact that Morgan Keegan issued its opinion that the merger consideration
is fair, from a financial point of view, to the Unaffiliated Security
Holders supports the conclusion by the Special Committee and our
Board
that NATL’s proposal is fair.
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
The
fact that we solicited interest by other parties likely to be interested
in Central and also received unsolicited inquiries, none of which
resulted
in an alternative proposal.
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
The
fact that the price paid for each share of Central Common Stock owned
by
our executive officers and directors will be the same as the price
per
share received by the Public Stockholders (although there are certain
additional interests that certain of our directors and officers may
have).
See “Special Factors—Conflicts of Interest and Other Interests of Certain
Persons in the Merger and Certain Relationships.”
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
The
fact that our Board and Special Committee have retained the right
to
change their recommendations in favor of the Merger if the failure
to do
so would constitute a breach of the Board’s fiduciary duties to Central’s
stockholders protects stockholders in the event that circumstances
change
significantly.
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
The
fact that we are permitted under certain circumstances to respond
to
inquiries regarding acquisition proposals and to terminate the Merger
Agreement in order to complete a superior proposal upon payment of
a $1.0
million termination fee and up to $500,000 of expenses protects the
interests of NATL without precluding another party from proposing
a
superior Acquisition Proposal.
|
|
·
|
The
fact that Unaffiliated Security Holders will not participate in
any
potential future growth of Central, if there is any.
|
|
|
·
|
The
fact that $2.25 is well below Central’s initial public offering price on
December 12, 2003 (even though the Common Stock has traded below
the
initial public offering price of $15.00 per share for approximately
85% of
the trading days since that
time).
|
|
|
·
|
The
fact that $2.25 was 84.9% of Central’s book value per share as of
December 31, 2005 could be viewed to weigh against the conclusion
that NATL’s proposal is fair to the Unaffiliated Security Holders,
although Central’s book value per share at April 1, 2006 was $2.09; as
such $2.25 represents a 7.8% premium to book value at April
1,
2006.
|
|
|
·
|
The
risk presented by the Merger of diverting management focus and resources
from taking advantage of strategic opportunities and devoting full
attention to revenue and profit generating activities and operational
matters in order to negotiate and close the transaction with NATL,
could
further materially impair our prospects as an independent company
if the
Merger is not consummated.
|
|
|
·
|
The
risks presented by the Merger of the disruption of our relationships
with
our employees, customers and other third parties could be affecting
our
current results and stock prices.
|
|
|
·
|
The
risk that the Merger might not be consummated for a number of reasons,
including the following.
|
|
|
○
|
If
NATL is unable to obtain financing, notwithstanding its covenants
in the
Merger Agreement, or if we or NATL are unable to satisfy one or more
of
the other closing conditions although the Special Committee and our
Board
believe that this transaction has the best chance of being
completed.
|
|
|
○
|
If
we are unable to settle or resolve the Securities Litigation, the
Derivative Litigation and the Merger Litigation within the limits
set
forth in Central’s applicable insurance policies, which the Special
Committee and our Board did not consider to be likely although it
may be
time-consuming.
|
|
|
·
|
The
fact that under the terms of the Merger Agreement, we cannot solicit
other
acquisition proposals and must pay a termination fee of $1.0 million
and up to $500,000 of expenses if the Merger Agreement is terminated
under
certain circumstances, which, in addition to being costly, might
have the
effect of discouraging other parties from proposing an alternative
transaction that might be more advantageous to our stockholders in
the
Merger, but we do not believe this would preclude competing
offers.
|
|
|
·
|
The
fact that Central must indemnify Mr. Moyes and his affiliates for any
liability, costs and expenses of up to $1.5 million incurred by such
persons in connection with litigation arising out of the negotiation,
approval, execution or performance of the Merger Agreement could
further
erode our liquidity position, although the Special Committee and
our Board
do not believe such obligation is likely to occur.
|
|
|
·
|
The
fact that any gain realized by our stockholders as a result of the
Merger
generally will be taxable for U.S. federal income tax purposes to
all
stockholders that receive the $2.25 per share offer if the Merger
is
consummated may not be a situation certain individual stockholders
wished
to experience.
|
|
|
·
|
The
fact that, pursuant to the Merger Agreement, we must generally conduct
our
business in the ordinary course, and we are subject to a variety
of other
restrictions on the conduct of our business prior to closing of the
Merger
or termination of the Merger Agreement, which may delay or prevent
us from
pursuing business opportunities that may arise or preclude actions
that
would be advisable if we were to remain an independent
company.
|
|
|
|
||
|
·
|
The
fact that NATL, Green, Mr. Moyes, Mr. Fasso and Central’s
directors and executive officers may have other interests related
to the
Merger that are different from the interests of the Public Stockholders
or
that may present a conflict of interest, which may be viewed as offsetting
the procedural safeguards we established. See “Special Factors—Conflicts
of Interest and Other Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger
and
Certain Relationships."
|
|
|
Multiples
|
Implied
Per-Share Equity Value
|
Offer
|
||||||||||||||
|
Valuation
Methodology
|
Low
|
Median
|
High
|
Low
|
Median
|
High
|
Price
|
Multiple/
Premium
|
||||||||
|
Peer
Group Analysis
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Enterprise
Value / LTM EBITDA
|
5.2
x
|
6.0
x
|
8.8
x
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$2.25
|
NM
|
||||||||
|
Enterprise
Value / FY2005E EBITDA
|
5.0
x
|
5.8
x
|
7.8
x
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$2.25
|
NM
|
||||||||
|
Enterprise
Value / FY2006E EBITDA
|
4.5
x
|
5.2
x
|
6.6
x
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$0.22
|
$2.25
|
10.5
x
|
||||||||
|
Enterprise
Value / LTM EBIT
|
7.3
x
|
11.2
x
|
12.3
x
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$2.25
|
NM
|
||||||||
|
Enterprise
Value / FY2005E EBIT
|
7.1
x
|
9.0
x
|
12.0
x
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$2.25
|
NM
|
||||||||
|
Enterprise
Value / FY2006E EBIT
|
6.6
x
|
7.7
x
|
9.8
x
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$2.25
|
NM
|
||||||||
|
Price
/ Current Book Value
|
1.5
x
|
2.1
x
|
3.5
x
|
$4.84
|
$6.67
|
$11.55
|
$2.25
|
0.7
x
|
||||||||
|
Price
/ FY2005E Book Value
|
1.4
x
|
2.1
x
|
3.4
x
|
$3.74
|
$5.74
|
$9.22
|
$2.25
|
0.8
x
|
||||||||
|
Price
/ FY2006E Book Value
|
1.2
x
|
1.8
x
|
2.7
x
|
$1.71
|
$2.53
|
$3.78
|
$2.25
|
1.6
x
|
||||||||
|
Precedent
Transaction Analysis
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Enterprise
Value / LTM EBITDA
|
2.9
x
|
4.6
x
|
8.0
x
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$2.25
|
NM
|
||||||||
|
Enterprise
Value / LTM EBIT
|
6.4
x
|
9.5
x
|
19.7
x
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$2.25
|
NM
|
||||||||
|
Price
/ Current Book Value
|
0.7
x
|
1.9
x
|
5.8
x
|
$2.20
|
$6.20
|
$18.82
|
$2.25
|
0.7
x
|
||||||||
|
Discounted
Cash Flow Analysis
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Terminal
Multiple of EBITDA
|
3.0
x
|
4.0
x
|
5.0
x
|
$2.65
|
$4.83
|
$7.31
|
$2.25
|
NA
|
||||||||
|
Terminal
Multiple of EBIT
|
5.0
x
|
6.0
x
|
7.0
x
|
$2.76
|
$4.27
|
$5.99
|
$2.25
|
NA
|
||||||||
|
Premium
Analysis
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Selected
Trucking Transactions (1)
|
12%
|
39%
|
104%
|
$2.39
|
$2.96
|
$4.33
|
$2.25
|
6%
|
||||||||
|
Selected
Industrial Transactions (1)
|
-99%
|
21%
|
300%
|
$0.02
|
$2.57
|
$8.51
|
$2.25
|
6%
|
||||||||
|
·
|
The
consideration to be paid to Central’s stockholders receiving cash in the
Merger represents a 24.3% premium over the reported closing sale
price
($1.81) of shares of Central Common Stock on Nasdaq on January 30,
2006,
the last trading day prior to the date on which the Merger was announced,
and a premium of approximately 25.4% over the average closing sale
price
($1.79) of shares of Central Common Stock on Nasdaq during the 30
trading
days prior to January 30, 2006;
|
|
·
|
The
consideration to be paid to Central’s stockholders (other than Affiliated
Continuing Investors and the Children’s Trust) in the Merger is all cash,
thus eliminating any uncertainty in valuing the consideration to
be
received by such stockholders; and
|
|
·
|
The
Merger will provide liquidity for Central’s stockholders (other than the
Affiliated Continuing Investors and the Children’s Trust) without the
delays that would otherwise occur in order to liquidate to positions
of
larger holders, and without incurring brokerage and other costs typically
associated with market sales.
|
|
·
|
The
fact that, as discussed above, the Merger Agreement must be approved
by a
majority of the voting power
of
the shares of Central Common Stock voting on the proposal that are
owned
by the Public Stockholders.
|
|
·
|
The
fact that Central’s Board established a Special Committee of independent
directors to negotiate and review
the transaction;
|
|
·
|
The
fact that Morgan Keegan and Blackwell were retained as financial
and legal
advisors to advise the Special Committee with respect to the
Merger;
|
| · | The fact that the opinion of Morgan Keegan addresses the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the merger consideration to be received by the Unaffiliated Security Holders; |
|
·
|
The
fact that Central’s
Board solicited interest by other parties likely to be interested
in
Central and also received unsolicited inquiries, none of which resulted
in
an alternative proposal;
|
|
·
|
The
fact that, other than the acceleration and vesting of stock options,
the
payment for cancellation of such options upon the consummation
of
the Merger, fees paid to directors who are not 10% stockholders,
officers
or employees for service on Board committees and for serving as the
chairpersons of those committees as discussed in more detail in “Corporate
Governance—Director Compensation,” and maintenance of indemnification and
insurance coverage as discussed in further detail in “—Conflicts of
Interest and Other Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger and
Certain
Relationships -Indemnification and Insurance,” Central’s executive
officers and directors will not receive any consideration in connection
with the Merger that is different from that received by the Public
Stockholders;
|
|
·
|
The
fact that Central’s Board and Special Committee have retained the right to
change their recommendation
in
favor of the Merger if, among other things, the failure to do so
would
constitute a breach of their fiduciary duties;
|
|
·
|
The
fact that Central is permitted under certain circumstances to respond
to
inquiries regarding acquisition
proposals and to terminate the Merger Agreement in order to complete
a
superior proposal upon payment of a $1.0 million termination fee
and up to
$500,000 of expenses.
|
|
·
|
any
shares held by Central as treasury shares; and
|
|
·
|
any
shares owned by the Affiliated Continuing Investors and the Children’s
Trust.
|
|
Financial
Advisor Fees and Expenses
|
$
|
|
SEC
Filing Fees
|
$
|
|
Legal
Fees and Expenses
|
$
|
|
Accounting
Fees
|
$
|
|
Printing
and Mailing Expenses
|
$
|
|
Solicitor
Fees and Expenses
|
$
|
|
Exchange
Agent Fees
|
$
|
|
Other
Fees
|
$_______(1)
|
|
Total
|
$
|
|
·
|
Each
share of Common Stock of Central issued and outstanding immediately
prior
to the effective time of the Merger (other than any shares owned
by the
Affiliated Continuing Investors and
the Children’s Trust) will be cancelled and extinguished and be converted
into the right to receive $2.25 in cash, without interest, payable
to the
holder thereof upon surrender of the certificate representing such
share
in accordance with the Merger Agreement;
|
|
·
|
Each
share of Common Stock held by the Affiliated Continuing Investors
and the
Children’s Trust will remain issued and outstanding shares of
Central;
|
|
·
|
Each
share of Green common stock will be converted into an amount of Central
Common Stock equal to the quotient obtained by dividing (i) the difference
between (A) all of the issued and outstanding shares of Central Common
Stock immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger and (B)
the
shares held by the Affiliated Continuing Investors and the Children’s
Trust, by (ii) the number of issued and outstanding shares of Green
common
stock immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger;
and
|
|
·
|
All
shares of Central Common Stock held by Central or any of its subsidiaries
as treasury stock prior to the effective time of the Merger will
be
canceled and retired, and no payment or other consideration will
be made
with respect thereto.
|
|
·
|
The
organization and similar corporate matters of NATL, Green, Central
and
Central’s subsidiary;
|
|
·
|
The
capital structure of Central;
|
|
·
|
Required
consents and approvals or conflicts under articles of incorporation,
by-laws or agreements, or violations of law;
|
|
·
|
Permits
and compliance with laws with respect to Central and its
subsidiary;
|
|
·
|
The
accuracy of information supplied by Central, NATL and Green in connection
with this Proxy Statement;
|
|
·
|
The
accuracy of filings made by Central with the SEC under the Exchange
Act
since November 26, 2003;
|
|
·
|
Tax
matters of Central and its subsidiary;
|
|
·
|
Actions
and proceedings affecting Central and its subsidiary;
|
|
·
|
Employee
agreements, benefit plans, employees and other employment related
matters
and practices of Central and its subsidiary;
|
|
·
|
Technology
and intellectual property rights of Central and its
subsidiary;
|
|
·
|
Title
to assets of Central and its subsidiary;
|
|
·
|
Required
stockholder votes with respect to Central;
|
|
·
|
Environmental
matters with respect to Central and its subsidiary;
|
|
·
|
Opinion
of Morgan Keegan as financial adviser to Central;
|
|
·
|
Board
of directors direction that the Merger Agreement and the transactions
contemplated therein by submitted to Central’s stockholders for
approval;
|
|
·
|
Insurance
with respect to Central and its subsidiary; and
|
|
·
|
Non-applicability
of certain provisions of Nevada law related to the
transaction.
|
|
·
|
Enter
into a new line of business or engage in any material
acquisitions;
|
|
·
|
Amend
its Articles of Incorporation or by-laws or any other similar
organizational documents;
|
|
·
|
Declare
or pay any dividends on, or make any other distributions with respect
to
it or its subsidiary’s capital stock or permit it or its or its subsidiary
to adjust, split, combine or reclassify any such capital stock or
issue,
grant, sell, transfer, pledge, dispose of or encumber any of its
capital
stock or redeem, purchase or otherwise acquire any of such capital
stock;
|
|
·
|
Enter
into, adopt or amend or increase the amount or accelerate the payment
or
vesting of any benefit or amount payable under any compensation,
severance, retention, profit sharing, stock option or equity-linked
pension or retirement plan, agreement or arrangement or enter into
or
amend any employment or severance agreement except in accordance
with
existing contracts or agreements, grant any severance or termination
pay
to any officer, director or employee of it or its
subsidiary;
|
|
·
|
Acquire
any assets or securities other than purchases of inventory in the
ordinary
course of business;
|
|
·
|
Sell,
lease, exchange, transfer or dispose of any assets except in the
ordinary
course of business;
|
|
·
|
Mortgage,
pledge, hypothecate, grant any security interest in any
assets;
|
|
·
|
Pay,
discharge or satisfy any material claims or compromise, settle, grant
any
waiver or release relating to, any litigation other than the settlement
of
certain stockholder litigation permitted under the Merger
Agreement;
|
|
·
|
Engage
in any transaction with, or enter into any new agreement, arrangement
or
understanding with any of it’s affiliates;
|
|
·
|
Make
or change any tax election, amend any tax return or settle any tax
liability;
|
|
·
|
Take
any action that would, or could reasonably be expected to, result
in any
of the representations and warranties made by it in the Merger Agreement
becoming untrue, or result in certain of the conditions to the Merger
not
being satisfied, or result in a material adverse effect on
Central;
|
|
·
|
Adopt
or enter into a plan of liquidation, dissolution, merger, consolidation,
restructuring, recapitalization or other reorganization of it or
any of
its subsidiaries;
|
|
·
|
Incur
or assume any debt other than pursuant to existing credit facilities,
capital leases of equipment and purchase money secured debt to purchase
equipment in the ordinary course of business, debt or sale/leasebacks
secured by real property in an aggregate amount in excess of $50
million;
|
|
·
|
Enter
into certain material commitments or transactions that will limit
it or
its subsidiary’s ability to compete with or conduct any business or line
of business;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
Modify,
terminate or enter any material contract; or
|
|
·
|
Enter
into an agreement, contract commitment or arrangement to do any of
the
foregoing.
|
|
·
|
Grant
any approvals or take such actions as required by any “moratorium,”
“control share,” “fair price,” or other antitakeover laws which may become
applicable to the Merger or any related transactions so that the
Merger or
any related transactions may be consummated;
|
|
·
|
Afford
to Green and its authorized representatives, including consultants,
advisors, lenders and financing sources, reasonable access during
normal
business hours upon reasonable prior notice to all of its premises,
properties, contracts, commitments, data, books and records and personnel,
will use its reasonable efforts to cause its customers, suppliers,
lenders
and other creditors to be available to Green for investigation, and
furnish promptly to Green (i) a copy of any document filed or received
by
it before the effective time of the Merger pursuant to the requirements
of
federal or state securities laws and (ii) all other information concerning
its business, properties and personnel as Green may reasonably request;
and
|
|
·
|
Give
prompt notice to NATL of (i) information or developments that could
reasonably be expected to lead to the conclusion that any representation
or warranty made by it was untrue or inaccurate when made or would
reasonably be expected to cause such representation or warranty to
be
untrue or inaccurate as of the closing of the Merger or (ii) the
failure
by it to comply with or satisfy in any material respect any covenant,
condition or agreement to be complied with or satisfied by it under
the
Merger Agreement.
|
|
·
|
Solicit,
initiate or knowingly encourage (including by way of furnishing
non-public
information) any inquiries or the making or of any submission or
any
proposal that constitutes an alternative acquisition
proposal;
|
|
·
|
Participate
or engage in any discussions or negotiations with or disclose any
non-public information to any person that has made an acquisition
proposal
or to any person in contemplation of an acquisition proposal;
or
|
|
·
|
Accept
an alternative acquisition
proposal.
|
|
·
|
It
receives a bona fide unsolicited written proposal from a party other
than
NATL;
|
|
·
|
The
Board determines that it constitutes a Superior Proposal (defined
below)
after receiving such advice from its financial
advisors;
|
|
·
|
The
Board determines in good faith after consultation with outside counsel
that the failure to participate in negotiations with or to furnish
information to the third party would constitute a breach of the Board’s
fiduciary duties; and
|
|
·
|
The
Board provides written notice to NATL that it has received a Superior
Proposal, specifying the material terms and conditions of the proposal
and
identifying the person, entity or group making the
proposal.
|
|
·
|
Central
receives an unsolicited Acquisition Proposal that it believes in
good
faith is a “Superior Proposal”;
|
|
·
|
The
Board determines in good faith based on the advice or its financial
advisors that the transaction proposed by NATL is not at least as
favorable to Central and its stockholders from a financial point
of view
(taking into account, among other things, all legal, financial, regulatory
and other aspects of the proposal, identity of the offeror and the
financial capacity of the offeror to consummate the superior proposal)
as
the Superior Proposal;
|
|
·
|
Failure
to make an Adverse Recommendation Change would result in a breach
of the
Board’s fiduciary duties; and
|
|
·
|
Central’s
Board provides written notice to NATL that it has received a Superior
Proposal, specifying the material terms and conditions of the Superior
Proposal and identifying the person or group making the Superior
Proposal.
|
|
·
|
“Acquisition
Proposal” means any bona fide proposal, whether or not in writing, for the
(i) direct or indirect acquisition or purchase of a business or
assets that constitutes 10% or more of the net revenues, net income
or the
assets (based on the fair market value thereof) of Central and its
subsidiary, taken as a whole, (ii) direct or indirect acquisition or
purchase of 10% or more of any class of equity securities or capital
stock
of Central or any of its subsidiaries whose business constitutes
10% or
more of the net revenues, net income or assets of Central and its
subsidiary, taken as a whole, (iii) merger, consolidation,
restructuring, transfer of assets or other business combination,
sale of
shares of capital stock, tender offer, exchange offer, recapitalization,
stock repurchase program or other similar transaction that if consummated
would result in any person or persons beneficially owning 10% or
more of
any class of equity securities of Central or any of its subsidiaries
whose
business constitutes 10% or more of the net revenues, net income
or assets
of Central and its subsidiary, taken as a whole, other than the
transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement.
|
|
·
|
“Superior
Proposal“ means any bona fide written acquisition proposal that was not
solicited by Central or any of its subsidiaries or any of their respective
officers, directors, investment bankers, attorneys, accountants,
financial
advisors, agents or other representatives, made by a third party
to
purchase all of the outstanding equity securities of Central pursuant
to a
tender offer, exchange offer or merger (i) which a majority of the
Board determines in good faith after receiving the advice of its
independent financial and legal advisors (A) to be superior to
Central and its stockholders (in their capacity as stockholders)
from a
financial point of view as compared to the transactions contemplated
by
the Merger Agreement and to any alternative transaction proposal
made by
NATL, and (B) which is likely to be consummated on its terms and
(ii) for which all requisite financing is fully
committed.
|
|
·
|
No
statute, rule, order, decree or regulation has been enacted or
promulgated, and no action has been taken, by any governmental entity
of
competent jurisdiction which temporarily, preliminarily or permanently
restrains, precludes, enjoins or otherwise prohibits the consummation
of
the Merger or makes the Merger illegal;
|
|
·
|
The
Merger has been approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of
a
majority of the outstanding shares of Central and the affirmative
vote of
a majority of the outstanding shares of Central owned by the Public
Stockholders;
|
|
·
|
Other
than filing the Articles of Merger with the Nevada Secretary of State
in
accordance with the Nevada Revised Statutes, all consents and approvals
of
all governmental entities required to be obtained prior to consummation
of
the Merger have been obtained, except for such authorizations, consents,
and approvals the failure of which to be obtained individually or
in the
aggregate would not have or result in a material adverse effect on
any
party to the Merger Agreement;
|
|
·
|
The
representations and warranties of the other party set forth in the
Merger
Agreement are true and correct as of the closing of the Merger;
and
|
|
·
|
The
performance in all material respects by each party of their obligations
under or pursuant to the Merger Agreement, which are required to
be
performed by them at or prior to the
Merger.
|
|
·
|
NATL
has received the proceeds of financing in an amount sufficient to
pay the
Merger consideration and all of the fees and expenses related to
the
Merger and related transactions;
|
|
·
|
The
execution by Mr. Fasso of the Subscription
Agreement and Stockholders’ Agreement;
|
| · |
All
conditions precedent in the Subscription
Agreement in
favor of Central, as the surviving corporation, shall have been
satisfied.
|
|
·
|
No
suit, action or proceeding (i) seeking to prohibit or limit in any
material respect the ownership or operation by Central, NATL or Green
of a
substantial portion of the business assets of Central or its subsidiary;
(ii) to require any material portion of the business or assets of
Central
and its subsidiary to be
|
|
|
disposed
of or held separate; or (iii) to restrain, preclude, enjoin or prohibit
the Merger or any related transaction, is then
pending;
|
|
·
|
All
(i) stockholder derivative actions, (ii) securities class actions
and
(iii) actions brought by stockholders based on a breach of duty in
connection with the transaction contemplated by the Merger Agreement
in
any case brought against Central or its officers or directors, which
currently consists of the Securities Litigation, Derivative Litigation
and
Merger Litigation described in the section of this Proxy Statement
entitled “Special Factors—Background of the Merger—Litigation”, have been
settled for an aggregate amount within Central’s applicable insurance
policies and without further liability of Central, its officers,
directors
or other indemnified parties; and
|
|
·
|
All
material consents and approvals necessary to the consummation of
the
Merger and any related transactions have been
obtained.
|
|
·
|
the
Merger is not completed on or before July 31, 2006, provided that
the
right to terminate the Merger Agreement for this reason is not available
to a party whose failure to fulfill any material obligation of the
Merger
Agreement is the cause of or results in the failure to consummate
the
merger on or before July 31, 2006;
|
|
·
|
any
statute, rule, order, decree or regulation is issued, or other action
is
taken by, a governmental entity which permanently restrains, enjoins
or
otherwise prohibits the Merger and is final and not-appealable;
or
|
|
·
|
Central’s
stockholders do not approve the Merger Agreement, except that Central’s
right to terminate the Merger Agreement for this reason shall not
apply if
the reason for the stockholders’ failure to approve is due to the breach
of the obligations of Central or its Board described herein under
“The
Merger Agreement—Restrictions on Negotiating and Entering into Alternative
Transactions and on Withdrawing the Recommendation with Respect to
the
Merger,” or because Central fails to hold the stockholders meeting
required to seek approval of the Merger Agreement and the related
transactions.
|
|
·
|
If
there is a material violation, breach or any inaccuracy in any
of the
representations, warranties, covenants or agreements of
NATL:
|
|
·
|
That
renders the satisfaction of any conditions to the obligation of
Central
impossible and Central does not waive the violation or breach;
and
|
|
·
|
The
violation or breach is not cured within thirty days after NATL
receives
written notice of the breach from Central or which by its nature
cannot be
cured by July 31, 2006.
|
|
·
|
If,
under the circumstances set forth in “The Merger Agreement—Restrictions on
Negotiating and Entering into Alternative Transactions and on Withdrawing
the Recommendation with Respect to the Merger,” Central complies with its
obligations described therein with respect to accepting or recommending
a
|
|
|
Superior
Proposal and it pays NATL the $1.0 million termination fee and up
to
$500,000 in reimbursement of expenses as described
below.
|
|
·
|
There
is a material violation, breach or any inaccuracy in any of the
representations, warranties, covenants or agreements of
Central:
|
|
|
○
|
That
renders the satisfaction of any conditions to the obligation of NATL
impossible and NATL does not waive the violation or breach;
and
|
|
|
○
|
Which
violation or breach is not cured within thirty days after Central
receives
written notice of the breach from NATL or which by its nature cannot
be
cured by July 31, 2006.
|
|
|
·
|
Central’s
Board or any committee thereof (including the Special Committee)
shall
have made an Adverse Recommendation Change, Central shall have entered
into an Alternative Definitive Agreement, or Central, its Board or
any
committee thereof (including the Special Committee) shall have resolved
to
do any of the foregoing.
|
|
|
·
|
NATL
terminates the Merger Agreement because Central has made an Adverse
Recommendation Change; or
|
|
·
|
Central
terminates the Merger Agreement due to entering into an Alternative
Definitive Agreement.
|
|
·
|
An
Acquisition Proposal is proposed by any person other than NATL or
Green or
any such person announces its intention to make an Acquisition Proposal
and thereafter the Merger Agreement is terminated by:
|
|
|
○
|
Central
or NATL because the Merger does not close by July 31,
2006;
|
|
|
○
|
Central
or NATL because Central’s stockholders fail to approve the Merger
Agreement and the transactions contemplated therein at the Central
stockholders meeting; or
|
|
|
○
|
NATL
due to Central’s failure to perform its covenants or agreements that make
the satisfaction of NATL’s conditions
impossible.
|
|
|
Quarter
Ended
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
April
1,
2006
|
|
|
April
2,
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
2004
|
2003(2)
|
2002(2)
|
2001
|
|||||||||
|
(unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(in
thousands, except per share amounts and operating
data)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Statements
of Operations Data:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Operating
revenues
|
$
|
78,933
|
$
|
89,322
|
$
|
372,140
|
$
|
386,601
|
$
|
389,696
|
$
|
371,445
|
$
|
395,702
|
||||||||
|
Operating
expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Salaries,
wages, and benefits
|
46,414
|
50,964
|
208,846
|
222,230
|
205,393
|
209,302
|
233,571
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Purchased
transportation
|
8,557
|
8,818
|
36,217
|
42,152
|
38,113
|
28,806
|
31,739
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Purchased
transportation — related parties
|
1,566
|
3,471
|
14,627
|
14,571
|
18,582
|
21,106
|
17,708
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Operating
and general supplies and expenses
|
20,671
|
20,605
|
91,806
|
82,702
|
66,144
|
59,270
|
67,193
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Operating
and general supplies and expenses — related parties
|
65
|
162
|
305
|
274
|
12
|
286
|
53
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Insurance
and claims
|
5,323
|
5,025
|
22,890
|
25,186
|
16,057
|
14,576
|
14,607
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Building
and equipment rentals
|
1,038
|
1,019
|
4,279
|
4,297
|
3,181
|
3,241
|
3,493
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Building
and equipment rentals — related parties
|
448
|
449
|
1,809
|
1,795
|
1,903
|
1,779
|
1,600
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Goodwill
impairment(3)
|
-
|
-
|
4,324
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
4,358
|
4,904
|
18,169
|
17,049
|
16,605
|
17,974
|
21,241
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Gains
on sales of operating assets
|
(2,034
|
)
|
(27
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||
|
Total
operating expenses
|
86,406
|
95,390
|
403,272
|
410,256
|
365,990
|
356,340
|
391,205
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Operating
(loss) income
|
(7,473
|
)
|
(6,068
|
)
|
(31,132
|
)
|
(23,655
|
)
|
23,706
|
15,105
|
4,497
|
|||||||||||
|
Interest
expense
|
1,317
|
615
|
3,860
|
1,469
|
3,547
|
4,916
|
5,620
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Interest
expense — related parties(4)
|
1,551
|
1,581
|
6,177
|
6,197
|
6,130
|
6,359
|
5,888
|
|||||||||||||||
|
(Loss)
income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
(10,341
|
)
|
(8,264
|
)
|
(41,169
|
)
|
(31,321
|
)
|
14,029
|
3,830
|
(7,011
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Income
tax benefit (expense) (5)
|
-
|
-
|
1,686
|
8,473
|
(1,759
|
)
|
1,412
|
119
|
||||||||||||||
|
Income
tax expense-conversion to C corporation
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(9,834
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||
|
(Loss)
income from continuing operations
|
(10,341
|
)
|
(8,264
|
)
|
(39,483
|
)
|
(22,848
|
)
|
2,436
|
5,242
|
(6,892
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Loss
from discontinued operations
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(8,341
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||
|
Net
(loss) income
|
$
|
(10,341
|
)
|
$
|
(8,264
|
)
|
$
|
(39,483
|
)
|
$
|
(22,848
|
)
|
$
|
(5,905
|
)
|
$
|
5,242
|
$
|
(6,892
|
)
|
||
|
Pro
Forma C Corporation Data:(6)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Historical
income (loss) from continuing operations before income
taxes
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
14,029
|
$
|
3,830
|
$
|
(7,011
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Pro
forma (provision) benefit for income taxes attributable to continuing
operations
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(5,666
|
)
|
(2,781
|
)
|
1,108
|
|||||||||||||
|
Pro
forma income (loss) from continuing operations
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
8,363
|
$
|
1,049
|
$
|
(5,903
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Loss
from discontinued operations
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(8,341
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||
|
Pro
forma net income (loss)
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
22
|
$
|
1,049
|
$
|
(5,903
|
)
|
|
Quarter
Ended
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
April
1,
2006
|
|
|
April
2,
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
2004
|
2003(2)
|
2002(2)
|
2001
|
|||||||||
|
(unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(in
thousands, except per share amounts and operating
data)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net
loss per share
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
$
|
(0.57
|
)
|
$
|
(0.45
|
)
|
$
|
(2.17
|
)
|
$
|
(1.27
|
)
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||
|
Diluted
|
(0.57
|
)
|
(0.45
|
)
|
(2.17
|
)
|
(1.27
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
18,288
|
18,192
|
18,230
|
17,971
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Diluted
|
18,288
|
18,192
|
18,230
|
17,971
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Pro
forma income (loss) from continuing operations per share:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
0.75
|
$
|
0.10
|
$
|
(0.54
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Diluted
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0.69
|
0.09
|
(0.54
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
11,163
|
10,868
|
10,916
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Diluted
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
12,103
|
11,548
|
10,916
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Other
Financial Data:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Capital
expenditures(7)
|
$
|
387
|
$
|
1,078
|
2,050
|
36,717
|
7,024
|
6,008
|
10,186
|
|||||||||||||
|
Operating
Data:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
LTL
revenue per hundredweight(8)
|
$
|
11.82
|
$
|
11.51
|
$
|
11.83
|
$
|
11.63
|
$
|
11.37
|
$
|
10.42
|
$
|
10.06
|
||||||||
|
Total
tons hauled
|
380,193
|
439,935
|
1,784,522
|
1,908,621
|
1,962,890
|
2,120,080
|
2,388,816
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Operating
ratio(9)
|
109.5
|
%
|
106.8
|
%
|
108.4
|
%
|
106.1
|
%
|
93.9
|
%
|
95.9
|
%
|
98.9
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Balance
Sheet Data (at period end):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
105
|
$
|
1,202
|
$
|
348
|
$
|
2,144
|
$
|
37,269
|
$
|
7,350
|
$
|
187
|
||||||||
|
Net
property and equipment
|
100,708
|
131,198
|
111,349
|
135,274
|
114,693
|
126,751
|
139,954
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total
assets
|
157,467
|
219,056
|
174,831
|
237,254
|
223,149
|
196,401
|
195,877
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Long-term
debt, capital leases, and related party financing, including current
portion
|
47,627
|
54,259
|
53,726
|
55,694
|
49,517
|
103,054
|
111,270
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Stockholders'
equity
|
38,175
|
79,372
|
48,386
|
87,558
|
108,438
|
30,374
|
23,302
|
|
(1) This
selected financial data should be read in conjunction with (a) the
audited
financial statements contained in Central's Annual Report on Form
10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, and (b) the unaudited financial
statements contained in Central's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the
quarter ended April 1, 2006 accompanying this Proxy Statement.
|
|
(2) Our
financial results for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, included
a
$2.9 million reduction in depreciation expense resulting from a January
2002 change in useful lives and salvage values of trailers and pick-up
and
delivery tractors based on our historical experience, which might
materially affect the comparability of the information presented,
and a
$725,000 restructuring charge representing the cost to close 21 terminals.
Our financial results for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003,
included the following items that might materially affect the
comparability of the information presented: (a) a $0.6 million reduction
in depreciation expense (in addition to the 2002 reduction) resulting
from
a January 2003 additional change in useful lives and salvage values
of
trailers and line tractors based on our historical experience; (b)
a $7.8
million gain attributable to the amendment of a benefit plan; and
(c) a
$3.8 million expense related to an increase in our claims accruals
relating to accident, workers' compensation, and other claims in
which the
underlying events occurred prior to 2003.
|
|
(3) In
2005, an annual impairment test of our goodwill, required by GAAP,
determined that the carrying value exceeded its fair value thereby
requiring that we write off the remaining net book value of approximately
$4.3 million.
|
|
(4) Effective
February 20, 2003, the payments for certain of the facilities we
lease
from a related party were increased to reflect fair market value.
The
lease is reflected as a financing arrangement in our consolidated
financial statements. Accordingly, our interest expense-related parties
includes approximately $3.3 million in annual non-cash interest expense
and contributed capital in all periods prior to February 20, 2003.
|
|
(5) In
2004, the Internal Revenue Service disallowed certain tax deductions
taken
by our S corporation stockholders pursuant to a contested liability
trust.
As a result, our tax basis was increased, resulting in a deferred
tax
benefit of $1.8 million. Also in 2004, we recorded a deferred tax
asset
valuation allowance of approximately $4.9 million.
|
|
(6) In
1998, we elected to be treated as an S corporation for federal income
tax
purposes. An S corporation passes through essentially all taxable
earnings
and losses to its stockholders and does not pay federal income taxes
at
the corporate level. Historical income taxes consist mainly of state
income taxes. On November 1, 2003, we converted into a C corporation.
For
comparative purposes, we have included a pro forma (provision) benefit
for
income taxes assuming we had been taxed as a C corporation in all
periods
when our S corporation election was in effect. In June 2002, we reversed
approximately $1.8 million of tax reserves which were originally
recorded
in 1998 when we elected to be treated as an S corporation. The $1.8
million tax benefit has been excluded for purposes of presenting
pro forma
C corporation income taxes.
|
|
(7) Includes
$0.8 million of capital expenditures in 2002 attributable to the
operations of Central Refrigerated Service, Inc., which we divested
on
December 31, 2002.
|
|
(8) Average
revenue we receive for transporting 100 pounds of
freight.
|
|
(9) Operating
expenses as a percentage of operating
revenues.
|
|
Fiscal
Year 2004
|
High
|
Low
|
|||||
|
First
Quarter
|
$
|
19.32
|
$
|
11.94
|
|||
|
Second
Quarter
|
$
|
13.23
|
$
|
7.14
|
|||
|
Third
Quarter
|
$
|
8.20
|
$
|
5.40
|
|||
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
$
|
7.25
|
$
|
5.32
|
|||
|
Fiscal
Year 2005
|
|||||||
|
First
Quarter
|
$
|
7.50
|
$
|
2.95
|
|||
|
Second
Quarter
|
$
|
3.88
|
$
|
2.35
|
|||
|
Third
Quarter
|
$
|
3.32
|
$
|
1.69
|
|||
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
$
|
2.31
|
$
|
1.50
|
|||
|
Fiscal
Year 2006
|
|||||||
|
First
Quarter
|
$
|
2.14
|
$
|
1.50
|
|||
|
Second
Quarter (through ____, 2006)
|
|
Name
|
Business
Address, Telephone Number and Principal Occupation
|
|
Jerry
Moyes
|
Mr. Moyes
is the founder and has been the sole owner of NATL since its formation.
Mr. Moyes’ business address is c/o Swift Aviation Group, Inc., 2710 E. Old
Tower Road, Phoenix, Arizona 85034 and his business telephone is
(602) 273-7704. His
principal occupation is Chairman of the Board of Directors of Swift
Aviation Group, Inc.
|
|
Name
|
Business
Address, Telephone Number and Principal Occupation
|
|
Jerry
Moyes
|
See
the information provided above under “Members of NATL.”
|
|
Jeff
Shumway
|
Mr.
Shumway currently serves as Chief Operating Officer for Mr. Moyes’ private
holdings. In that capacity, Mr. Shumway manages all of Mr. Moyes’ private
business activities, real estate developments and investments.
Mr. Shumway has served in this capacity since 2003. Since April 13,
2006, Mr. Shumway has also served as the Chief Executive Officer of
the Phoenix Coyotes of the National Hockey League. Prior to these
positions, Mr. Shumway worked with numerous start-up businesses in
both legal and management capacities from 1997 to 2003. Mr. Shumway
was with the Arizona law firm of Lewis & Roca from 1994 to 1997
specializing in corporate litigation. Before joining Lewis & Roca, Mr.
Shumway was with the national law firm of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher
& Flom from 1990 to 1994 based in their Delaware office. Mr. Shumway’s
business address is c/o Swift Aviation Group, Inc., 2710 E. Old Tower
Road, Phoenix, Arizona 85034 and his business telephone is (602)
273-7704.
|
|
Name
|
Business
Address, Telephone Number and Principal Occupation
|
|
Jerry
Moyes
|
Mr. Moyes
is the founder and has been a director of Green since its formation.
See
also the information provided above under “Members of
NATL.”
|
|
Jeff
Shumway
|
Mr.
Shumway has been a director and officer of Green since its formation.
See
also the information provided above under “Executive Officers of
NATL.”
|
|
Name
|
Business
Address, Telephone Number and Principal Occupation
|
|
Jerry
Moyes
|
See
the information provided above under “Members of NATL.”
|
|
Jeff
Shumway
|
See
the information provided above under “Executive Officers of
NATL.”
|
|
Robert
V. Fasso, 52
|
Director
Since 2002
|
|
John
Breslow, 56
|
Director
Since 2003
|
|
John
Campbell Carruth, 75
|
Director
Since 2004
|
|
Porter
J. Hall, 62
|
Director
Since 2003
|
|
Name
|
Audit
Committee
|
Compensation
Committee
|
Nominating
and
Corporate
Governance
Committee
|
|||
|
John
Breslow
|
x
|
x
|
x
|
|
Cam
Carruth
|
|
x
|
|
x
|
|
x
|
|
Porter
J. Hall
|
|
x
|
|
x
|
|
x
|
|
·
|
Is
independent under NASD Rule 4200(a)(15);
|
|
·
|
Meets
the criteria for independence set forth in Rule 10A-3(b)(1) under
the
Exchange Act;
|
|
·
|
Did
not participate in the preparation of the financial statements of
Central
or any current subsidiary of Central at any time during the past
three
years; and
|
|
·
|
Is
able to read and understand fundamental financial statements, including
Central’s balance sheet, income statement and cash flow
statement.
|
|
·
|
Reviewed
and discussed the audited financial statements with management and
McGladrey & Pullen, LLP, Central’s independent
auditors;
|
|
·
|
Discussed
with the auditors the matters required to be disclosed by Statement
on
Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended, “Communication with Audit
Committees or Others with Equivalent Authority and Responsibility”;
and
|
|
·
|
Received
the written disclosures and the letter from the independent auditors
required by Independence Standards Board Statement No. 1, as amended,
“Independence Discussions with Audit Committees,” and discussed with the
independent auditors the independent auditors’
independence.
|
|
Audit
Committee
|
|
|
Porter
J. Hall, Chairman
|
|
|
John
Breslow, Member
|
|
|
John
Campbell Carruth, Member
|
|
·
|
All
director nominees should be committed to Central's basic beliefs
as set
forth in Central's Code of Conduct and Ethics and should be individuals
of
integrity, intelligence, and strength of character;
|
|
·
|
All
director nominees should have reputations, both personal and professional,
consistent with the image and reputation of Central;
|
|
·
|
All
director nominees should have strong leadership skills;
|
|
·
|
All
director nominees should have the ability to exercise sound business
judgment;
|
|
·
|
All
director nominees should have relevant expertise and experience,
including
educational or professional backgrounds, and should be able to offer
advice and guidance to management of Central based on that expertise
and
experience;
|
|
·
|
All
director nominees should have a willingness to commit the necessary
time
and effort to attend and participate in Board meetings and related
Board
activities;
|
|
·
|
To
the extent necessary to ensure that a majority of the Boards is
independent, non-employee director nominees should be "independent"
as
defined by Rule 4200 of the NASDAQ Stock Market listing requirements,
qualify as a "non-employee director" as defined in Section 16 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, be free of any relationship that,
in the
Board's discretion, would interfere with the nominee's independent
judgment, and comply with all of Central's corporate governance guidelines
and principles as amended from time to time;
|
|
·
|
Non-employee
director nominees also should maintain the independence necessary
for an
unbiased evaluation of management performance;
|
|
·
|
Non-employee
director nominees should effectively oversee Central's strategy,
goals and
progress;
|
|
·
|
Non-employee
director nominees should have a working knowledge of corporate governance
issues and the changing role of boards;
|
|
·
|
Non-employee
director nominees should have demonstrated management and/or business
skills or experience that will contribute substantially to the management
of Central;
|
|
·
|
Non-employee
director nominees should have a general understanding of marketing,
finance, and other disciplines relevant to the success of a
publicly-traded company in the current business environment;
and
|
|
·
|
Non-employee
director nominees should have an understanding of Central's business
and
the general trucking or transportation industry, or the willingness
and
ability to develop such an
understanding.
|
|
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
|
Robert
V. Fasso
|
52
|
Chief
Executive Officer and President
|
|
Walter
D. Ainsworth
|
53
|
Executive
Vice President
|
|
Jeffrey
A. Hale
|
46
|
Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
Richard
Stolz
|
52
|
Senior
Vice President - Sales and
Marketing
|
|
Annual
Compensation
|
Long-term
Compensation
|
|||||||||
|
Awards
|
Payouts
|
|||||||||
|
Name
and
Principal
Position
|
Year
|
Salary
($)(1)
|
Bonus
($)
|
Other
Annual Compensation
($)
|
Restricted
Stock
Award(s)
($)
|
Securities
Underlying Options
(#)
|
LTIP
Payouts
|
All
Other
Compensation
($)(2)
|
||
|
Robert
V. Fasso
President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
2005
2004
2003
|
350,000
362,382
348,077
|
--
--
126,000(3)
|
--
--
2,686,706(4)
|
--
--
--
|
--
--
--
|
--
--
--
|
19,411
14,708
12,973
|
||
|
Walter
D. Ainsworth(5)
Executive
Vice President
|
2005
2004
2003
|
300,000
132,393
--
|
--
240,000(6)
--
|
--
--
--
|
--
--
--
|
--
150,000
--
|
--
--
--
|
20,312
58,257
--
|
||
|
Jeffrey
A. Hale
Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
2005
2004
2003
|
215,379
180,652
172,115
|
--
--
50,000(3)
|
--
--
--
|
--
--
--
|
--
--
--
|
--
--
--
|
14,152
13,533
11,625
|
||
|
Richard
Stolz(7)
Senior
Vice President- Sales and Marketing
|
2005
2004
2003
|
203,077
--
--
|
--
--
--
|
--
--
--
|
--
--
--
|
100,000
--
--
|
--
--
--
|
16,186
--
--
|
||
|
(1)
|
Includes
amounts deferred pursuant to our 401(k) plan. Due to timing, salary
payments in 2004 included one additional payroll
amount.
|
|
(2)
|
Consists
of: (a) excess life insurance paid for Mr. Fasso ($828 in 2005, $6,951
in
2004 and $690 in 2003), Mr. Ainsworth ($828 in 2005), Mr. Hale ($540
in
2005, $254 in 2004 and $254 in 2003), and Mr. Stolz ($1,290 in 2005);
(b)
personal use of a company car for Mr. Fasso ($5,833 in 2005, $6,677
in
2004 and $6,113 in 2003), Mr. Ainsworth ($8,266 in 2005 and $2,120
in
2004), Mr. Hale ($12,022 in 2005, $12,199 in 2004 and $10,576 in
2003),
and Mr. Stolz ($2,561 in 2005), (c) moving costs for Mr. Ainsworth
($8,708 in 2005 and $55,837 in 2004) and Mr. Stolz ($12,335 in 2005)
and
(d) other insurance premiums paid for Mr. Fasso ($12,750 in 2005,
$1,080
in 2004 and $6,170 in 2003), Mr. Ainsworth ($2,510 in 2005 and $300
in
2004), and Mr. Hale ($1,590 in 2005, $1,080 in 2004 and $795 in
2003).
|
|
(3)
|
Consists
of bonuses earned in 2003 and paid in 2004.
|
|
(4)
|
Consists
of ordinary income recognized in 2003 by Mr. Fasso under federal
income
tax guidelines upon exercise of vested incentive stock options. No
cash
was received by Mr. Fasso. The stock options were granted to Mr.
Fasso in
2002 pursuant to our Incentive Stock Plan.
|
|
(5)
|
Mr.
Ainsworth was hired in July 2004, and amounts included in the table
above
for 2004 are for July to December of that year.
|
|
(6)
|
Consists
of a bonus earned in 2004, one half of which was paid in 2004 and
one half
of which was paid in January 2005.
|
|
(7)
|
Mr.
Stolz was hired in March 2005, and amounts included in the table
above for
2005 are for March to December of that
year.
|
|
Individual
Grants
|
|||||||||||
|
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Options
|
Percent
of
Total
Options
Granted
to
Employees
|
Exercise
price
|
Expiration
|
Potential
Realizable Value
at
Assumed Annual Rates
of
Stock Price
Appreciation
for Option
Term(3)
|
|||||||
|
Name
|
Granted
(#)(1)
|
in
Fiscal Year(2)
|
($/Sh)
|
Date
|
5%
($)
|
10%
($)
|
|||||
|
Robert
V. Fasso
|
0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||
|
Walter
D. Ainsworth
|
0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||
|
Jeffrey
A. Hale
|
0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||
|
Richard
Stolz
|
100,000
|
34.2%
|
$
2.61
|
04/06/2015
|
$
164,141
|
$
415,967
|
|||||
|
(1)
|
Each
option represents the right to purchase one share of Common Stock
under
our incentive stock plan.
|
|
(2)
|
During
2005, we granted employees options to purchase an aggregate of 292,500
shares of Common Stock.
|
|
(3)
|
We
show the potential realizable values net of the options’ exercise price,
but before the payment of taxes associated with exercise. Potential
realizable values are based on a fair market value at the date of
grant of
$2.61 per share for the underlying Common Stock. The potential realizable
values represent hypothetical gains if the holders exercised their
options
at the end of the option term. The SEC’s rules provide the assumed 5% and
10% annual rates of stock price appreciation and measure the appreciation
from the grant date.
|
| Name
|
Shares
Acquired
on
Exercise
(#)
|
|
|
Value
Realized
($)
|
|
|
Number
of Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
at FY-End (#) Exercisable
Unexercisable |
|
|
Value
of Unexercised
In-the-Money
Options at FY-End ($) (1)
Exercisable
Unexercisable
|
|||||||||
|
Robert
V. Fasso
|
—
|
—
|
252,000
|
252,000
|
$
|
108,360
|
$
|
108,360
|
|||||||||||
|
Walter
D. Ainsworth
|
—
|
—
|
150,000
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|||||||||||||
|
Jeffrey
A. Hale
|
—
|
—
|
60,000
|
40,000
|
25,800
|
17,200
|
|||||||||||||
|
Richard
Stolz
|
—
|
—
|
100,000
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|||||||||||||
|
(1)
|
Based
on the $1.78 per share closing price of our Common Stock on December
30,
2005.
|
|
·
|
We
can grant incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, bonus
stock, reload options or any other stock-based award to employees,
officers, directors, consultants and any other person determined
by the
Board to have performed services for or on behalf of Central which
merit
the grant of an award.
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
We
reserved 5,000,000 shares of Common Stock for issuance under the
plan and
have outstanding options covering 1,426,953 of those shares as of
March 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
Our
Board or its designated committee administers the plan and makes
all
grants thereunder.
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
Options
that are canceled, forfeited, expire, or are tendered for tax withholding
or to pay the exercise price become available again for use under
the
plan.
|
|
Compensation
Committee
|
|
|
John
Breslow, Chairman
|
|
|
John
Campbell Carruth, Member
|
|
|
Porter
J. Hall, Member
|

|
Name
and Address of Beneficial Owner(1)
|
Amount
and Nature
of
Beneficial
Ownership(2)
|
Percent
of Class(2)
|
|||||
|
Jerry
and Vickie Moyes(3)
|
5,766,351
|
31.5
|
%
|
||||
|
Contrarian
Capital Management, L.L.C.(4)
|
1,282,128
|
7.0
|
%
|
||||
|
Robert
V. Fasso(5)
|
1,134,000
|
6.1
|
%
|
||||
|
John
Breslow(6)
|
83,000
|
*
|
|||||
|
John
Campbell Carruth(7)
|
30,000
|
*
|
|||||
|
Porter
J. Hall(8)
|
20,000
|
*
|
|||||
|
Walter
D. Ainsworth(9)
|
150,000
|
*
|
|||||
|
Jeffrey
A. Hale(10)
|
60,000
|
*
|
|||||
|
Richard
Stolz(11)
|
100,000
|
*
|
|||||
|
All
directors and executive officers as a group (7 persons)
|
1,577,000
|
8.3
|
%
|
||||
|
(1)
|
Unless
otherwise indicated, the business address of the persons named in
the
above table is care of Central Freight Lines, Inc., 5601 West Waco
Drive,
Waco, Texas 76710.
|
|
(2)
|
For
purposes of this table, a person or group of persons is deemed to
have
“beneficial ownership” of any shares which such person has the right to
acquire within sixty days. Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement,
each option to purchase shares of Central Common Stock that is outstanding
immediately prior to the Merger will become fully exercisable at
that
time. See the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “The Merger
Agreement—Stock Options”. For purposes of computing the percentage of
outstanding shares held by each person or group of persons named
above,
any security which such person or group of persons has the right
to
acquire within sixty days is deemed to be outstanding for the purpose
of
computing the percentage ownership for such person or persons, but
is not
deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage
ownership of any other person. As a result, the denominator used
in
calculating the beneficial ownership among our stockholders may differ,
but are not deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage
ownership of any other person.
|
|
(3)
|
Includes
12,000 shares beneficially owned under options that are currently
exercisable or will become exercisable within sixty days. Of the
shares
attributed to Jerry Moyes, 1,046,002 are held by Jerry and Vickie
Moyes as
trustees of the Jerry and Vickie Moyes Family Trust (the “Moyes Family
Trust”), 4,708,348 are held by Gerald F. Ehrlich as trustee of the Moyes
Children’s Trust (the “Moyes Children’s Trust”) and 12,001 shares
(including 12,000 shares under option) are held by Mr. Moyes individually.
Mr. Ehrlich has sole voting and investment power for the Moyes Children’s
Trust. Mr. Moyes disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held
by Mr.
Ehrlich as trustee of the Moyes Children’s Trust. The business address of
Mr. Moyes, Mrs. Moyes and the Family Trust is care of Swift Aviation
Group, Inc., 22710 E. Old Tower Road, Phoenix, AZ 85034. The business
address of the Children’s Trust is 4001 North Third St., Suite 400,
Phoenix, AZ 85012.
|
|
(4)
|
As
reported on Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on March 6, 2006. The
business
address of Contrarian Capital Management, L.L.C., as reported in
such
Schedule 13G, is 411 West Putnam Avenue, Suite 225, Greenwich, CT
06830.
|
|
(5)
|
Includes
378,000 shares beneficially owned under options that are currently
exercisable or will become exercisable within sixty days. Mr. Fasso’s
business telephone number is (480)
361-5295.
|
|
(6)
|
Includes
(a) 50,000 shares held by Linweld, Inc. and (b) 20,000 shares beneficially
owned under options that are currently exercisable or will become
exercisable within sixty days. The business address of Mr. Breslow
is 2900
South 70th Street, Suite 400, Lincoln, NE 68506.
|
|
(7)
|
Includes
20,000 shares beneficially owned under options that are currently
exercisable or will become exercisable within sixty days. The business
address of Mr. Carruth is 316 Rivershire Court, Lincolnshire, IL
60069.
|
|
(8)
|
Includes
20,000 shares beneficially owned under options that are currently
exercisable or will become exercisable within sixty days. The business
address of Mr. Hall is 2825 East Cottonwood Parkway, Suite 300, Salt
Lake
City, UT 84121.
|
|
(9)
|
Includes
150,000 shares beneficially owned under options that are currently
exercisable or will become exercisable within sixty days.
|
|
(10)
|
Includes
60,000 shares beneficially owned under options that are currently
exercisable or will become exercisable within sixty days.
|
|
(11)
|
Includes
100,000 shares beneficially owned under options that are currently
exercisable or will become exercisable within sixty
days.
|
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||
|
Audit
Fees(1)
|
$
|
256,318
|
$
|
994,625
|
|||
|
Audit-Related
Fees
|
--
|
--
|
|||||
|
Tax
Fees
|
--
|
--
|
|||||
|
All
Other Fees(2)
|
--
|
--
|
|||||
|
Total
|
$
|
256,318
|
$
|
994,625
|
|||
|
(1)
|
Audit
Fees. Audit fees were for professional services rendered for the
audit and
quarterly reviews of the Company’s financial statements for the applicable
fiscal year.
|
|
(2)
|
All
Other Fees. For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2005, and December
31,
2004, the Company was not billed for any other services.
|
|
(1)
|
Central's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2005;
and
|
|
(2)
|
Central's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 1,
2006.
|
|
Central
Freight Lines, Inc.
|
|
|
Robert
V. Fasso
|
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer and President
|
|
|
_____
__, 2006
|
|
|
Page
|
||
|
ARTICLE
I THE MERGER
|
A-1
|
|
|
|
||
|
1.1
|
The
Merger
|
A-1
|
|
1.2
|
Closing
|
A-1
|
|
1.3
|
Articles
of Incorporation; Bylaws
|
A-2
|
|
1.4
|
Directors
and Officers of the Surviving Corporation
|
A-2
|
|
|
||
|
ARTICLE
II CONVERSION OF SHARES
|
A-2
|
|
|
|
||
|
2.1
|
Conversion
of Capital Stock
|
A-2
|
|
2.2
|
Exchange
of Certificates.
|
A-3
|
|
2.3
|
Change
in Shares
|
A-4
|
|
2.4
|
Company
Option Plans.
|
A-4
|
|
|
||
|
ARTICLE
III REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE COMPANY
|
A-5
|
|
|
|
||
|
3.1
|
Organization.
|
A-5
|
|
3.2
|
Capitalization.
|
A-5
|
|
3.3
|
Authorization;
Validity of Agreement.
|
A-6
|
|
3.4
|
No
Violations; Consents and Approvals.
|
A-7
|
|
3.5
|
SEC
Reports and Financial Statements.
|
A-8
|
|
3.6
|
Restatement.
|
A-9
|
|
3.7
|
Absence
of Certain Changes.
|
A-9
|
|
3.8
|
Absence
of Undisclosed Liabilities.
|
A-10
|
|
3.9
|
Proxy
Statement; Schedule 13E-3; Merger Documents.
|
A-10
|
|
3.10
|
Employee
Benefit Plans; ERISA.
|
A-11
|
|
3.11
|
Litigation;
Compliance with Law.
|
A-13
|
|
3.12
|
Intellectual
Property.
|
A-14
|
|
3.13
|
Contracts.
|
A-15
|
|
3.14
|
Taxes.
|
A-15
|
|
3.15
|
Environmental
Matters.
|
A-17
|
|
3.16
|
Assets.
|
A-18
|
|
3.17
|
Real
Property.
|
A-18
|
|
3.18
|
Insurance.
|
A-19
|
|
3.19
|
Labor
Matters.
|
A-19
|
|
3.20
|
Affiliate
Transactions.
|
A-19
|
|
3.21
|
Brokers.
|
A-20
|
|
3.22
|
Opinion
of Financial Advisor.
|
A-20
|
|
|
||
|
ARTICLE
IV REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARENT AND THE
PURCHASER
|
A-20
|
|
|
|
||
|
4.1
|
Organization.
|
A-20
|
|
4.2
|
Authorization;
Validity of Agreement
|
A-20
|
|
4.3
|
Consents
and Approvals; No Violations.
|
A-21
|
|
4.4
|
Information
in Proxy Statement; Schedule 13E-3; Merger Documents
|
A-21
|
|
4.5
|
Broker
|
A-21
|
|
|
||
|
ARTICLE
V COVENANTS
|
A-22
|
|
|
|
||
|
5.1
|
Interim
Operations of the Company
|
A-22
|
|
5.2
|
Acquisition
Proposals.
|
A-24
|
|
5.3
|
Takeover
Statute
|
A-27
|
|
5.4
|
Access
to Information and Properties.
|
A-27
|
|
5.5
|
Further
Action; Reasonable Efforts.
|
A-27
|
|
5.6
|
Proxy
Statement; Schedule 13E-3; Stockholders' Meeting.
|
A-28
|
|
5.7
|
Notification
of Certain Matters
|
A-29
|
|
5.8
|
Directors'
and Officers' Insurance and Indemnification.
|
A-30
|
|
5.9
|
Publicity
|
A-30
|
|
5.10
|
Indemnity
|
A-31
|
|
5.11
|
Stockholders'
Agreement and Subscription Agreement
|
A-31
|
|
|
||
|
ARTICLE
VI CONDITIONS
|
A-31
|
|
|
|
||
|
6.1
|
Conditions
to Each Party's Obligation to Effect the Merger
|
A-31
|
|
6.2
|
Conditions
to the Obligation of the Company to Effect the Merger
|
A-32
|
|
6.3
|
Conditions
to Obligations of Parent and the Purchaser to Effect the
Merger
|
A-32
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE
VII TERMINATION
|
A-33
|
|
|
|
||
|
7.1
|
Termination
|
A-33
|
|
7.2
|
Effect
of Termination
|
A-35
|
|
|
||
|
ARTICLE
VIII MISCELLANEOUS
|
A-35
|
|
|
|
||
|
8.1
|
Fees
and Expenses.
|
A-35
|
|
8.2
|
Amendment;
Waiver.
|
A-36
|
|
8.3
|
Notices
|
A-36
|
|
8.4
|
Interpretation;
Definitions
|
A-37
|
|
8.5
|
Headings;
Schedules
|
A-43
|
|
8.6
|
Counterparts
|
A-43
|
|
8.7
|
Entire
Agreement
|
A-44
|
|
8.8
|
Severability
|
A-44
|
|
8.9
|
Governing
Law
|
A-44
|
|
8.10
|
Assignment
|
A-44
|
|
8.11
|
Parties
in Interest.
|
A-44
|
|
8.12
|
Specific
Performance.
|
A-44
|
|
Acceptable
Confidentiality Agreement
|
A-25,
A-38
|
Material
Adverse Effect
|
A-40
|
|
|
Acquisition
Proposal
|
A-26,
A-38
|
Material
Contract
|
A-15,
A-41
|
|
|
Adverse
Recommendation Change
|
A-25,
A-38
|
Merger
|
A-1,
A-41
|
|
|
Agreement
|
A-1,
A-38
|
Merger
Consideration
|
A-2,
A-41
|
|
|
Alternative
Definitive Agreement
|
A-38
|
Moyes
Stockholders
|
A-41
|
|
|
Articles
of Incorporation
|
A-2,
A-38
|
Moyes
Stockholders Shares
|
A-2,
A-41
|
|
|
Articles
of Merger
|
A-1,
A-38
|
Notice
of Superior Proposal
|
A-25,
A-41
|
|
|
Assets
|
A-18,
A-38
|
NRS
|
A-1,
A-41
|
|
|
Balance
Sheet
|
A-10,
A-38
|
Outside
Date
|
A-41
|
|
|
Board
|
A-1,
A-38
|
Owned
Real Property
|
A-41
|
|
|
Business
Day
|
A-38
|
Parent
|
A-1,
A-41
|
|
|
Bylaws
|
A-2,
A-38
|
Paying
Agent
|
A-3,
A-41
|
|
|
Capital
Budget
|
A-22,
A-38
|
Permits
|
A-14,
A-41
|
|
|
Certificates
|
A-3,
A-38
|
Permitted
Liens
|
A-41
|
|
|
Closing
|
A-1,
A-38
|
Person
|
A-42
|
|
|
Closing
Date
|
A-1,
A-38
|
Plans
|
A-11,
A-42
|
|
|
Code
|
A-38
|
Preferred
Stock
|
A-5,
A-42
|
|
|
Company
|
A-1,
A-38
|
Proxy
Statement
|
A-28,
A-42
|
|
|
Company
Common Stock
|
A-2,
A-38
|
Public
Stockholders
|
A-42
|
|
|
Company
SEC Documents
|
A-8,
A-38
|
Purchaser
|
A-1,
A-42
|
|
|
Confidentiality
Agreement
|
A-27,
A-39
|
Purchaser
Common Stock
|
A-2,
A-42
|
|
|
Credit
Agreement
|
A-22,
A-39
|
Real
Property
|
A-42
|
|
|
Disclosure
Letter
|
A-5,
A-39
|
Release
|
A-42
|
|
|
Effective
Time
|
A-1,
A-39
|
Required
Vote
|
A-42
|
|
|
Employment
and Withholding Taxes
|
A-39
|
Return
|
A-42
|
|
|
Environmental
Claim
|
A-39
|
Schedule
13E-3
|
A-29,
A-42
|
|
|
Environmental
Laws
|
A-39
|
SEC
|
A-7,
A-42
|
|
|
ERISA
|
A-11,
A-39
|
Secretary
of State
|
A-1,
A-42
|
|
|
ERISA
Affiliate
|
A-11,
A-39
|
Securities
Act
|
A-8,
A-42
|
|
|
ERISA
Plans
|
A-11,
A-39
|
Shares
|
A-2,
A-42
|
|
|
Exchange
Act
|
A-8,
A-39
|
SPD
|
A-11,
A-42
|
|
|
Expenses
|
A-39
|
Special
Committee
|
A-1,
A-42
|
|
|
GAAP
|
A-8,
A-40
|
Stock
Option Plans
|
A-4,
A-43
|
|
|
Governmental
Entity
|
A-7,
A-40
|
Stock
Options
|
A-4,
A-43
|
|
|
Hazardous
Substance
|
A-40
|
Stockholders'
Agreement
|
A-42
|
|
|
Indemnified
Merger Parties
|
A-31,
A-40
|
Stockholders'
Meeting
|
A-29,
A-43
|
|
|
Indemnified
Merger Party
|
A-40
|
Subscription
Agreement
|
A-43
|
|
|
Indemnified
Parties
|
A-30,
A-40
|
Subsidiary
|
A-43
|
|
|
Intellectual
Property
|
A-14,
A-40
|
Superior
Proposal
|
A-26,
A-43
|
|
|
Investing
Stockholder
|
A-40
|
Surviving
Corporation
|
A-1,
A-43
|
|
|
Laws
|
A-7,
A-40
|
Tax
|
A-43
|
|
|
Leased
Real Property
|
A-40
|
Technology
|
A-14,
A-43
|
|
|
Leases
|
A-40
|
Termination
Fee
|
A-35,
A-43
|
|
|
Liens
|
A-40
|
Transaction
Litigation
|
A-31,
A-43
|
|
|
Litigation
|
A-13,
A-40
|
WARN
Act
|
A-19,
A-43
|
|
Central
Freight Lines, Inc.
|
|
|
15333
North Pima Road
|
|
|
Suite
230
|
|
|
Scottsdale,
AZ 85260
|
|
|
Telephone:
(480) 361-5289
|
|
|
Facsimile:
(480) 361-5297
|
|
|
Attention:
John C. Carruth
|
|
|
with
a copy to:
|
|
|
Blackwell
Sanders Peper Martin LLP
|
|
|
4801
Main Street, Suite 1000
|
|
|
Kansas
City, MO 64112
|
|
|
Telephone:
(816) 983-8000
|
|
|
Facsimile:
(816) 983-8080
|
|
|
Attention:
Jeffrey T. Haughey, Esq.
|
|
North
American Truck Lines, LLC
|
|
|
2710
E. Tower Rd.
|
|
|
Phoenix,
AZ 85034
|
|
|
Telephone:
(602) 225-3712
|
|
|
Facsimile:
(602) 275-6417
|
|
|
Attention:
Jeff A. Shumway
|
|
|
with
a copy to:
|
|
|
Skadden,
Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
|
|
|
Four
Times Square
|
|
|
New
York, New York 10036
|
|
|
Telephone:
(212) 735-3000
|
|
|
Facsimile:
(212) 735-2000
|
|
|
Attention:
Stephen F. Arcano, Esq.
|
|
NORTH
AMERICAN TRUCK LINES, LLC
|
||
|
By:
|
/s/
Jeff A. Shumway
|
|
|
Name:
|
Jeff
A.
Shumway
|
|
|
Title:
|
Manager
|
|
|
GREEN
ACQUISITION COMPANY
|
||
|
By:
|
/s/
Jeff A. Shumway
|
|
|
Name:
|
Jeff
A.
Shumway
|
|
|
Title:
|
President
|
|
|
CENTRAL
FREIGHT LINES, INC.
|
||
|
By:
|
/s/
J.
C. Carruth
|
|
|
Name:
|
J.
C.
Carruth
|
|
|
Title:
|
Director
|
|
|
Very
truly yours,
|
|
|
/s/
Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc.
|
|
|
MORGAN
KEEGAN & COMPANY, INC.
|
|
1.
|
Approval
of the Agreement and Plan of Merger, by and among Central Freight
Lines,
Inc., North American Truck Lines, LLC and Green Acquisition Company
dated
as of January 30, 2006:
|
|
[
] FOR
|
[
]
AGAINST
|
[
]
ABSTAIN
|
|
2.
|
Approval
of the adjournment of the annual meeting, if necessary or appropriate,
to
provide time to solicit additional proxies if it does not appear
that
there will be enough shares voted in favor of the Merger Agreement
to
approve it at the time of the Annual Meeting:
|
|
[
] FOR
|
[
]
AGAINST
|
[
]
ABSTAIN
|
|
3.
|
Election
of Directors:
|
[
] FOR
all nominees listed below
(except as marked to the contrary below)
|
[
] WITHHOLD
AUTHORITY
to
vote for all nominees listed below
|
|
Robert
V. Fasso
|
John
Campbell Carruth
|
|
John
Breslow
|
Porter
J. Hall
|
|
Dated
__________________________________, 2006
|
|
| __________________________________________________ | |
| __________________________________________________ | |
|
Signature(s)
|
|
|
Please
date and sign exactly as name(s) appear(s) on your Common Stock
certificate(s). If shares are held jointly, each owner should sign
this
proxy. If acting as an executor, administrator, trustee, custodian,
guardian, etc., you should so indicate in signing. If the stockholder
is a
corporation or other business entity, the proxy should indicate the
full
legal name of the corporation or entity, and be signed by a duly
authorized officer (indicating his or her
position).
|