| x |
Preliminary
Proxy Statement
|
| o |
Confidential,
for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
14a-6(e)(2))
|
| o |
Definitive
Proxy Statement
|
| o |
Definitive
Additional Materials
|
| o |
Soliciting
Materials Pursuant to § 240.14a-11(c) or
§ 240.14a-12
|
|
o
|
No
fee required
|
||
|
o
|
Fee
computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and
0-11
|
||
|
(1)
|
Title
of each class of securities to which transaction
applies:
|
||
|
(2)
|
Aggregate
number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
||
|
(3)
|
Per
unit price or other underlying value of transaction
computed
|
||
|
pursuant
to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on
which
|
|||
|
the
filing fee is calculated and state how it was
determined):
|
|||
|
(4)
|
Proposed
maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
||
|
(5)
|
Total
Fee paid:
|
||
|
x
|
Fee
paid previously
|
||
|
x
|
Check
box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee
was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its
filing.
|
||
|
(1)
|
Amount
previously paid:
|
$3,087.00
|
|
(2)
|
Form,
Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
Schedule
14A
|
|
(3)
|
Filing
Party:
|
Central
Freight Lines, Inc.
|
|
(4)
|
Date
Filed:
|
April
17, 2006
|
|
Sincerely,
|
|
|
Robert
V. Fasso
|
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer and
President
|
|
1.
|
APPROVAL
OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT. To consider and vote upon a proposal to
approve
the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of January 30, 2006, as
amended (the “Merger Agreement”), by and among Central, North American
Truck Lines, LLC (“NATL”) and Green Acquisition Company (“Green”), which
agreement provides for the merger of Green, a wholly-owned subsidiary
of
NATL, with and into Central with Central as the surviving corporation
in
the merger (the “Merger”);
|
|
2.
|
ADJOURNMENT.
To approve the adjournment of the Annual Meeting, if necessary or
appropriate, to provide time to solicit additional proxies if it
does not
appear that there will be enough shares voted in favor of the Merger
Agreement to approve it at the time of the Annual
Meeting;
|
|
3.
|
ELECTION
OF DIRECTORS. To consider and act upon a proposal to elect four directors
of Central; and
|
|
4.
|
OTHER
MATTERS. To consider and act upon such other matters as may properly
come
before the Annual Meeting and any adjournment
thereof.
|
|
By
Order of the Board of Directors,
|
|
|
Jeffrey
A. Hale
|
|
|
Secretary
|
|
|
Waco,
Texas
|
|
|
October___,
2006
|
|
SUMMARY
TERM SHEET
|
||
|
The
Merger and Related Transactions
|
||
|
Effects
of the Merger and Related Transactions
|
||
|
Recommendation
of our Board
|
||
|
Factors
Considered by the Board and the Special Committee
|
||
|
Morgan
Keegan's Fairness Opinion
|
||
|
Position
of NATL, Green, Mr. Fasso and the Affiliated Continuing Investors
Regarding the Merger
|
||
|
Conflicts
of Interest and Other Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger
and
Certain Relationships
|
||
|
U.S.
Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger
|
||
|
Central’s
Stockholders Must Approve the Merger Agreement
|
||
|
Regulatory
Approvals Related to the Merger
|
||
|
Source
and Amount of Funds
|
||
|
The
Merger Consideration
|
||
|
Conditions
to Completion of the Merger
|
||
|
Certain
Stockholder Litigation
Currently
Pending Against Central
|
||
|
Termination
of the Merger Agreement and Non-Solicitation
|
||
|
GENERAL
INFORMATION
|
||
|
Time,
Place and Date
|
||
|
Proxies
and Voting
|
||
|
Right
to Attend Annual Meeting; Revocation of Proxy
|
||
|
Costs
of Solicitation
|
||
|
Annual
Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
|
||
|
How
To Read This Proxy Statement
|
||
|
QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER AND THE ANNUAL MEETING OF
STOCKHOLDERS
|
||
|
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
|
||
|
PROPOSAL
ONE - APPROVAL OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT
|
||
|
THE
PARTIES TO THE MERGER AGREEMENT
|
||
|
Central
Freight Lines, Inc.
|
||
|
North
American Truck Lines, LLC
|
||
|
Green
Acquisition Company
|
||
|
Relationships
Between Central and NATL
|
||
|
SPECIAL
FACTORS
|
||
|
Background
of the Merger
|
||
|
Litigation
|
||
|
Reasons
for the Merger
|
||
|
Recommendation
of our Board and Fairness of the Merger
|
||
|
Opinion
of Central’s Financial Advisor
|
||
|
|
Position
of NATL, Green, Mr. Fasso and the Affiliated Continuing Investores
Regarding the Merger
|
|
|
Conduct
of Central’s Business if the Merger is Not Completed
|
||
|
Conflicts
of Interest and Other Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger
and
Certain Relationships
|
||
|
Agreement
with the Affiliates
|
||
|
Accounting
Treatment
|
||
|
Regulatory
Requirements
|
||
|
Net
Operating Loss Carryforwards
|
||
|
U.S.
Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger
|
||
|
Fees
and Expenses
|
||
|
Source
and Amount of Funds
|
||
|
THE
MERGER AGREEMENT
|
||
|
The
Merger
|
||
|
Conversion
of Securities
|
||
|
Stock
Options
|
||
|
Exchange
of Certificates
|
||
|
Articles
of Incorporation and By-Laws; Directors and Officers
|
||
|
Representations
and Warranties
|
||
|
Covenants
Relating to the Conduct of Central’s Business
|
||
|
Other
Covenants
|
||
|
Restrictions
on Negotiating and Entering into Alternative Transactions and on
Withdrawing the Recommendation with Respect to the Merger
|
||
|
Covenants
Regarding Stockholder Meeting
|
||
|
Directors’
and Officers’ Insurance and Indemnification
|
||
|
Indemnification
of NATL, Green and Their Respective Controlling Persons, Directors,
Officers, Employees and Agents
|
||
|
Conditions
Precedent to the Merger
|
||
|
Termination
of the Merger Agreement; Termination Fees and Expenses
|
||
|
CENTRAL
FREIGHT LINES, INC. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
|
||
|
MARKET
FOR THE COMMON STOCK
|
||
|
SECURITIES
OWNERSHIP
|
||
|
CONTROLLING
PERSONS, DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF CENTRAL, NATL AND
GREEN
|
||
|
Background
of Named Persons
|
||
|
Past
Contacts, Transactions and Negotiations
|
||
|
Plans
or Proposals
|
||
|
Recent
Transactions in Central Common Stock
|
||
|
Contracts,
Arrangements or Understandings Concerning Central’s
Securities
|
||
|
PROPOSAL
TWO - GRANTING OF PROXY TO ADJOURN THE ANNUAL MEETING
|
||
|
PROPOSAL
THREE - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
|
||
| CORPORATE GOVERNANCE | ||
|
Board
of Directors
|
||
|
Committees
of the Board
|
||
|
The
Audit Committee
|
||
|
Report
of the Audit Committee
|
|
The
Compensation Committee
|
||
|
The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
|
||
|
The
Special Committee
|
||
|
Director
Compensation
|
||
|
Executive
Officers of Central
|
||
|
Code
of Conduct and Ethics
|
||
|
Section
16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
|
||
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
||
|
Summary
Compensation Table
|
||
|
Options
Grants In Last Fiscal Year
|
||
|
Aggregated
Options Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year-End Option
Value
Table
|
||
|
Employment
Agreements
|
||
|
Executive
Bonus Program
|
||
|
Incentive
Stock Plan
|
||
|
401(k)
Profit Sharing Plan
|
||
|
Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
|
||
|
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
|
||
|
Compensation
Committee Report on Executive Compensation
|
||
|
Stock
Performance Graph
|
||
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
|
||
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
|
||
|
RELATIONSHIP
WITH INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
|
||
|
Change
in Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
||
|
Principal
Accounting Fees and Services
|
||
|
Pre-Approval
Policy
|
||
|
OTHER
MATTERS
|
||
|
STOCKHOLDER
PROPOSALS
|
||
|
INCORPORATION
BY REFERENCE
|
||
|
WHERE
YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
|
||
|
ANNEX A-1—
AGREEMENT
AND PLAN OF MERGER BY AND AMONG
CENTRAL FREIGHT LINES, INC., NORTH AMERICAN TRUCK LINES, LLC AND
GREEN
ACQUISITION COMPANY dated as of January 30, 2006
|
|
ANNEX
A-2—FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF
MERGER BY AND AMONG CENTRAL FREIGHT LINES, INC., NORTH AMERICAN TRUCK
LINES, LLC
AND
GREEN
ACQUISITION COMPANY dated as of September 13, 2006
|
|
ANNEX B—
MORGAN KEEGAN & COMPANY, INC. FAIRNESS OPINION dated January 30,
2006
|
|
Ownership
Prior to the Merger
|
Ownership
After the Merger
|
|||||
|
Stockholder
|
Percent
Ownership
of
Common
Stock
July 1,
2006
|
Portion
of Net
Book
Value as of
July 1,
2006
|
Portion
of Net
Losses
in the
Six
Months ended
July 1,
2006
|
Percent
Ownership
of
the Surviving Corporation
Equity
|
Portion
of Net
Book
Value as of
July 1,
2006
|
Portion
of Net
Losses
in the
Six
Month ended
July 1,
2006
|
|
(dollars
in thousands)
|
||||||
|
Public
Stockholders
|
64.43%
|
$
19,557
|
$
11,784
|
0.00%
|
$
0
|
$
0
|
|
Affiliated
Continuing Investors:
|
||||||
|
Jerry
Moyes(1)
|
0.00%
|
$
0
|
$
0
|
68.57%
|
$
20,814
|
$
12,541
|
|
The
Family Trust
|
5.71%
|
$
1,733
|
$
1,044
|
5.71%
|
$
1,733
|
$
1,044
|
|
The Children’s Trust
|
25.72%
|
$
7,807
|
$
4,704
|
25.72%
|
$
7,807
|
$
4,704
|
|
Robert
V. Fasso
|
4.13%
|
$
1,254
|
$
755
|
0.00%(2)
|
$
0(2)
|
$
0(2)
|
|
All
Directors and Executive Officers as a Group other than Mr.
Fasso
|
0.40%
|
$
121
|
$
73
|
0.00%
|
$
0
|
$
0
|
| (1) | Includes shares of the surviving corporation owned by NATL, which is controlled by Mr. Moyes. |
|
(2)
|
Mr.
Fasso will be able to purchase up to 504,000 shares, or approximatley
2.68%, of the common stock of the surviving corporation after the
Merger
pursuant to his amended stock options
agreement.
|
|
•
|
As
a result of the Merger, Mr. Moyes, indirectly through NATL, will
acquire
control of the surviving corporation, holding 68.6% of the common
stock of
the surviving corporation. The Affiliated Continuing Investors
will hold
their shares of the surviving corporation, which will aggregate
to 31.4% of the common stock and voting interest of the surviving
corporation.
|
|
•
|
Each
holder of options to purchase Central Common Stock with an exercise
price
below $2.25 (other than Mr. Moyes and Mr. Fasso), including each
director and executive officer of
Central,
|
|
|
will
be entitled to receive in cash the difference between the exercise
price
and $2.25 multiplied by the number of shares of Common Stock subject
to
that option. Holders of options with an exercise price
above or equal to $2.25 will be entitled to receive $0.01 multiplied
by
the number of shares of Common Stock subject to that option. Stock
options
owned by Mr. Moyes will be cancelled at the effective time of the
Merger.
|
|
•
|
Mr.
Fasso will hold options to purchase up to 504,000 shares, or approximately
2.7%, of the common stock of the surviving corporation if he exercises
his
stock options as amended at a cost of $1.35 per
share. It
is a condition to NATL’s obligation to consummate the transactions
anticipated by the Merger Agreement that, immediately prior to
closing of
the Merger, Mr. Fasso will execute and deliver a Stockholders’ Agreement
that, when executed by the other parties thereto, will govern the
rights of Mr. Fasso and the Affiliated Continuing Investors upon
the
consummation of the Merger.
|
|
•
|
Central’s
directors and executive officers will continue to have rights to
indemnification and liability insurance coverage for six years following
the Merger.
|
|
•
|
The
payment of $30,000 to the Chairman of the Special Committee in recognition
of the time and effort he expended in evaluating the Merger and
negotiating the Merger Agreement, which amount was authorized by
the
Board.
|
|
•
|
It
is expected that all of Central’s executive officers, none of whom will
hold any common stock in the surviving corporation at the consummation
of
the Merger, will continue to be employed by Central following the
Merger.
See the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Special
Factors—Conflicts of Interest and Other Interests of Certain Persons in
the Merger and Certain
Relationships.”
|
|
•
|
the
Merger Agreement is approved by the affirmative vote of the holders
of a
majority of the outstanding shares of Central Common Stock and the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding
shares
beneficially held by the Public Stockholders;
|
|
•
|
Mr. Fasso
must have executed and delivered to Central the Stockholders’
Agreement.
|
|
Q:
|
What
is the date, time and place of the annual
meeting?
|
|
A:
|
The
Annual Meeting will be held at _______, Phoenix time, on Monday,
November
13, 2006, at __________________________________.
|
|
Q:
|
What
are the proposals that I will be voting
on?
|
|
A:
|
You
are being asked to vote on the following
proposals:
|
|
○
|
to
approve the Merger Agreement;
|
|
○
|
to
approve the adjournment of the Annual Meeting, if necessary or
appropriate, to provide time to solicit additional proxies if there
are
not enough shares voted in favor of the Merger Agreement to approve
it at
the time of the Annual Meeting; and
|
|
○
|
to
elect four directors to our Board.
|
|
Q:
|
Who
is entitled to vote at the
meeting?
|
|
A:
|
All
stockholders of record as of the close of business on September 15,
2006
may vote. You are entitled to one vote per share of Central Common
Stock
that you owned on the Record Date on each item of business to be
considered at the Annual Meeting.
|
|
Q:
|
How
does our board of directors recommend that I
vote?
|
|
○
|
“FOR” the
proposal to approve the Merger Agreement;
|
|
○
|
“FOR”
the adjournment of the Annual Meeting, if necessary;
and
|
|
○
|
“FOR” each
of the four director nominees.
|
|
Q:
|
What
vote of our stockholders is required to approve the
proposals?
|
|
A:
|
The
vote requirements to approve the proposals are as
follows:
|
|
○
|
The
proposal to approve the Merger Agreement requires the affirmative
vote of
both (i) the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of
Central Common Stock entitled to vote thereon (i.e., the “Statutory Vote”)
and (ii) a majority of the outstanding shares of Central Common Stock
beneficially owned by holders other than the Affiliated Continuing
Investors and Mr. Fasso (i.e.,
the “Public Stockholder Vote”).
|
|
○
|
The
proposal to adjourn the Annual Meeting, if necessary, to provide
time to
solicit additional proxies if it does not appear that there will
be enough
shares voted in favor
|
| of the Merger Agreement to approve it at the time of the Annual Meeting, requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares then present at the meeting. | |
|
○
|
The
election of directors is by a plurality of the votes
cast.
|
|
Q:
|
Is
the Board recommending that I vote for the Merger
Agreement?
|
|
A:
|
Yes,
the Board recommends unanimously that you vote for the Merger
Agreement.
|
|
Q:
|
Why
is the Board recommending that I vote for the Merger
Agreement?
|
|
A:
|
After
considering the recommendation for approval of the Merger Agreement
by the
Special Committee as well as the opinion of Morgan Keegan as to the
financial fairness of the merger consideration to be received by
the
Unaffiliated Security Holders, our Board has concluded that the terms
of
the Merger Agreement are advisable, fair to and in the best interests
of
the Unaffiliated Security Holders.
|
|
Q:
|
What
will I receive in the
Merger?
|
|
A:
|
In
the Merger, each issued and outstanding share of Central Common
Stock
(other than shares held by the Affiliated Continuing Investors)
will be
converted into the right to receive the merger consideration of
$2.25 per
share in cash, without interest. Each holder of options to purchase
Central Common Stock with an exercise price below $2.25 (other
than
Mr. Moyes and Mr. Fasso), including each director and executive
officer of Central, will receive in cash the difference between
the
exercise price and $2.25 multiplied by the number of shares of
Common
Stock subject to that option in consideration for the cancellation
of that
option. Each holder of options with an exercise price equal to
or greater
than $2.25, including directors and executive officers of Central,
will
receive $0.01 multiplied by the number of shares subject to that
option in
consideration for the cancellation of that option.
|
|
Q:
|
Will
the Affiliated Continuing Investors be paid for their
shares?
|
|
A:
|
The
Affiliated Continuing Investors’ shares will remain issued and
outstanding without payment when the Merger is
completed.
|
|
Q:
|
What
will happen to Central after the
Merger?
|
|
A:
|
Central
will continue to exist after the Merger, but will no longer be a
public
company and will no longer have shares traded on the Nasdaq National
Market (“Nasdaq”).
|
|
Q:
|
Who
will continue as stockholders of
Central?
|
|
A:
|
The
Affiliated Continuing Investors will continue as stockholders of
Central.
Mr. Fasso, although receiving the merger consideration in exchange
for his shares of Central Common Stock, will hold options to purchase
up
to 504,000 shares, or approximately 2.7%, of the common stock of
the
surviving corporation after consummation of the Merger pursuant
to his
amended stock option agreement. NATL’s holdings of Green Common Stock will
be converted into Central Common Stock pursuant to the terms of
the Merger
Agreement.
|
|
Q:
|
What
will happen to the directors who are up for election if the Merger
Agreement is
approved?
|
|
A:
|
If
the Merger Agreement is approved by our stockholders and the Merger
is
completed, each of our directors elected at the Annual Meeting will
serve
until the effective time of the Merger. Immediately prior to the
closing
of the Merger, Central will deliver to NATL the notices of resignation
of
each of its then-current directors, and each such resignation will
be
effective as of the effective time of the Merger. Under the terms
of the
Merger Agreement, the directors of Green will become the directors
of
Central as the surviving corporation in the
Merger.
|
|
Q:
|
What if the Merger is not completed? |
|
A:
|
It
is possible the Merger will not be completed. That might happen if,
for
example, Central’s stockholders do not approve the Merger Agreement. In
this event, Central will continue to be a publicly traded company
listed
on Nasdaq until further action is
taken.
|
|
Q:
|
What
do I need to do now?
|
|
A:
|
After
you read and carefully consider the information contained in this
Proxy
Statement, please fill out, sign and date your proxy card and mail
it in
the enclosed return envelope as soon as possible, so that your shares
will
be represented at the Annual
Meeting.
|
|
Q:
|
How
are votes counted?
|
|
A:
|
For
the proposal relating to the approval of the Merger Agreement, you
may
vote “FOR,”
“AGAINST”
or “ABSTAIN.”
If you “ABSTAIN,”
it has the same effect as if you vote “AGAINST”
the approval of the Merger Agreement with respect to both (i) the
Statutory Vote and (ii) the Public Stockholder Vote. Likewise, broker
non-votes will be counted as votes against the approval of the Merger
Agreement. Abstentions and broker non-votes will count for the purpose
of
determining whether a quorum is present. See “General Information—Proxies
and Voting” for a discussion of broker
non-votes.
|
|
Q:
|
If
my shares are held in “street name” by my broker, will my broker vote my
shares for me?
|
|
A:
|
Your
broker will vote your shares with respect to the proposal to approve
the
Merger Agreement only if you provide instructions on how to vote.
You
should follow the directions provided by your broker regarding how
to
instruct your broker to vote your shares. Brokers who do not receive
instructions regarding
how to vote with respect to the election of directors or the adjournment
of the Annual Meeting may vote the uninstructed shares according
to their
discretion.
|
|
Q:
|
How
many shares must be present or represented at the Annual Meeting
in order
to conduct business?
|
|
A:
|
A
quorum of stockholders is necessary to hold a valid Annual Meeting,
provided that a vote may be taken to adjourn the meeting even if
a quorum
is not then present. A quorum is present at the Annual Meeting if
a
majority of the shares of Central Common Stock entitled to vote on
the
Record Date are present in person
or
represented by proxy. Withheld votes, abstentions and broker non-votes
are
counted as present for the purposes of determining whether a quorum
is
present.
|
|
Q:
|
Should
I send in my stock certificates
now?
|
|
A:
|
No.
If the Merger is completed, you will receive written instructions
for
exchanging your stock certificates.
|
|
Q:
|
May
I change my vote?
|
|
A:
|
Yes.
If you hold your shares in your own name, just send to Central’s Secretary
a written revocation notice or a later-dated, signed proxy card before
the
Annual Meeting or attend the Annual Meeting and vote. If your shares
are
held in “street name,” you should follow the directions provided by your
broker regarding how to change your
vote.
|
|
Q:
|
Am
I entitled to appraisal or dissenters’
rights?
|
|
A:
|
Under
Chapter 92A of the Nevada Revised Statutes, you are not entitled
to any
dissenters’ rights with respect to the
Merger.
|
|
Q:
|
What
are the tax consequences of the Merger to
me?
|
|
A:
|
Receipt
of the merger consideration by the Public Stockholders generally
will be a
taxable transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes and possibly
for
state, local and foreign tax purposes as well. To review the tax
consequences in greater detail, see the section of this Proxy Statement
entitled “Special
Factors—U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger.”
The
tax consequences of the Merger to the Public Stockholders will depend
on
their own respective financial and tax situations. The Public Stockholders
should consult with their respective tax and legal advisors for a
full
understanding of the tax consequences of the Merger to
them.
|
|
Q:
|
When
do you expect the Merger to be
completed?
|
|
A:
|
It
is expected that the Merger will be completed as soon as possible
after
the Annual Meeting, subject to the approval of Central’s stockholders and
the satisfaction or waiver of the other conditions contained in the
Merger
Agreement. However, we cannot predict exactly when these conditions
will
be satisfied.
|
|
Q:
|
When
will I receive the cash consideration for my shares of Central Common
Stock?
|
|
A:
|
After
the Merger is completed, Public Stockholders and Mr. Fasso will
receive written instructions, including a letter of transmittal,
that
explain how to exchange their shares for the cash consideration paid
in
the Merger. When Public Stockholders and Mr. Fasso properly complete
and return the required documentation
described in the written instructions, they will promptly receive
from the
paying agent a payment of cash consideration for their
shares.
|
|
Q:
|
What
else will happen at the Annual
Meeting?
|
|
A:
|
The
Board does not intend to present at the Annual Meeting any matters
other
than those described herein and does not presently know of any matters
that will be presented by other parties although it is possible that
a
holder of Central Common Stock may attempt to introduce a matter
for
stockholder vote at the Annual
Meeting.
|
|
Q:
|
What
happens if I sell my shares of Central Common Stock before the Annual
Meeting?
|
|
A:
|
The
Record Date for the Annual Meeting is earlier than the date of the
Annual
Meeting and the date that the Merger is expected to be completed.
If you
transfer your shares of Central Common Stock after the Record Date
but
before the Annual Meeting, you will retain your right to vote at
the
Annual Meeting, but will have transferred the right to receive the
cash
consideration to be received by our stockholders in the
Merger.
|
|
Q:
|
Who
can help answer my
questions?
|
|
A:
|
If
you have questions about the Merger, need additional copies of this
Proxy
Statement or have any questions about Central’s operations, please call
Jeff Hale, Central’s Chief Financial Officer, at (480)
361-5295.
|
|
•
|
Reducing
the amount of public information available to competitors regarding
Central’s business and strategy by terminating Central’s reporting
obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the
“Exchange Act”).
|
|
•
|
Eliminating
other burdens on Central’s management and sales force related to Central’s
public company status, including, for example, the dedication of
time and
resources necessary to respond to stockholder and analyst inquiries
and to
maintain investor and customer relations in the face of analyst,
stockholder and competitor speculation.
|
| • |
Eliminating
costs associated with being a public company, including professional
fees
associated with filing quarterly, annual and other periodic reports
with
the SEC, the substantial internal and external costs
of compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the expense of
publishing and distributing annual reports and proxy statements to
stockholders and the costs of compensating independent directors.
The
Company estimates that it incurred approximately $1.9 million and
$3.3
million of public company costs in 2004 and 2005, respectively, including
approximately $150,000 in internal labor costs in each
year.
|
|
•
|
Increasing
the ability of Central’s management to focus on long-term business goals,
as a non-reporting company, rather than short-term expectations and
speculation.
|
|
•
|
The
belief that a premium over the market price of Central Common Stock
for
our stockholders could be
negotiated.
|
|
•
|
The
continuing challenges faced by Central in working with its consultants
and
accountants to respond to the internal controls requirements imposed
by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002;
|
|
•
|
The
recent need for Central’s junior- and senior-level management to spend
significant amounts of time addressing customer and employee concerns
regarding Central’s financial position following adverse analyst reports
that questioned Central’s ability to continue as an independent public
company; and
|
|
•
|
The
negative impact the foregoing had on management’s ability to implement its
turnaround plan and improve results of
operations.
|
| • |
Elimination
of the financing condition to the obligation of NATL and Green
to effect
the Merger.
|
| • |
Extension
of the date to complete the Merger from July 31, 2006 to
November 30, 2006.
|
| • |
Approval
of the amendment of Mr. Fasso’s options to purchase Central Common Stock
so that they may be exercised after the consummation of the Merger,
which
eliminated the need for a Subscription Agreement with
Mr. Fasso.
|
| • |
Cancellation
of the options to purchase Central Common Stock held by Mr. Moyes
at the
effective time of the Merger.
|
| • |
Clarification
that certain pending litigation is not subject to the condition
requiring
settlement within Central’s applicable insurance policy
limits.
|
| • |
Revision
of other provisions to correspond with these revisions to the
Merger
Agreement.
|
| · | The Board established the Special Committee of independent directors to consider any proposal and available alternatives. The Special Committee was composed of Mr. Carruth and Mr. Hall. The Special Committee retained an independent financial advisor, Morgan Keegan, and independent outside counsel, Blackwell Sanders. | |
|
·
|
The
process conducted under the direction of the Special Committee was
a
factor in the determination by the Special Committee and our Board
that
the Merger Agreement is fair to the Unaffiliated Security Holders
and in
their best interests and it consisted of the following
steps.
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
°
|
Morgan
Keegan contacted six strategic buyers regarding a potential acquisition
of
Central prior to the receipt of the proposal from NATL on
November 10, 2005. We issued a press release on November 10,
2005 announcing NATL’s proposal and our engagement of Morgan Keegan as
financial advisor to the Special Committee, which gave other parties
ample
opportunity to explore possible transactions with Central and which
would
have given Central alternative transactions to consider in addition
to
NATL’s proposal.
|
|
|
||
|
|
°
|
Three
parties contacted Central’s management expressing an interest in
considering an alternative proposal, including the firm that had
previously proposed a PIPE transaction. After the expiration of
the
Exclusivity Period with NATL, Morgan Keegan and management of Central
contacted these three interested parties as well as the strategic
buyers
it had contacted prior to receiving NATL’s proposal and one other
potential strategic buyer who we thought might be interested in
Central.
Only one of these parties expressed sufficient interest to warrant
a
non-disclosure agreement to be executed to provide further information
on
Central to explore a possible transaction with us, which did not
lead to
an alternative proposal.
|
|
·
|
The
$2.25 per share offer by NATL to our stockholders was the only
offer
received even though Central, through its own efforts and the efforts
of
Morgan Keegan, had made other potential buyers aware of the opportunity
to
acquire Central. Fair value is a function of what buyers are willing
to
pay.
|
|
|
·
|
The
fact that NATL’s offer will be paid in cash provides relative certainty,
immediate value and liquidity to our stockholders.
|
|
|
·
|
The
premium represented by $2.25 per share in cash to be paid to our
stockholders contrasted with the current and historical trading
prices of
shares of Central Common Stock contributed to the conclusion by
the
Special Committee and our Board that the $2.25 per share offer
is fair to
the Unaffiliated Security Holders. See “Special Factors—Opinion of
Central’s Financial Advisor.”
|
|
|
○
|
The
premiums to our stock price of 5.8% to our average closing prices
over the
thirty trading days prior to the day we announced our receipt
of the
proposal (after the close of the market) and 26.9% to our average
closing
price over the thirty trading days prior to the date we announced
entry
into the Merger Agreement, figured prominently in the determination
of the
Special Committee and the Board that the $2.25 per share offer
is fair to
the Unaffiliated Security Holders, due to the fact that these
closing
prices reflect the market values of our stock prior to the material
disclosures represented by the receipt of NATL’s proposal and execution of
the Merger Agreement.
|
|
○
|
The
premium to our closing stock price of $__ on _______, 2006 is ____%.
|
|
|
○
|
Further,
the conclusion by the Special Committee and the Board was predicated,
in
part, on the belief of the members that absent a transaction with
NATL,
there is a significant risk that the Company’s stock price could decline
below current levels based on continuing losses.
|
|
|
○
|
We
discounted historical trading prices of our Common Stock in light
of the
ongoing losses over the last two years resulting in the declining
stock
prices over this period.
|
|
|
·
|
The
information contained in the financial analyses presented by Morgan
Keegan
at the Special Committee meetings on January 5, 2006 and
January 21, 2006, and at our Board meetings on January 21 and
26, 2006, supported the conclusion by the Special Committee and
our Board
that the $2.25 per share offer is fair to the Unaffiliated Security
Holders.
|
|
|
·
|
Morgan
Keegan’s opinion dated January 30, 2006 that, as of that date and
based upon and subject to the considerations set forth in its
opinion, the
$2.25 per share in cash to be received by the Unaffiliated Security
Holders was fair, from a financial point of view, to such stockholders
contributed to the conclusion by the Special Committee and our
Board that
the $2.25 per share offer is fair to the Unaffiliated Security
Holders.
See “Special Factors—Opinion of Central’s Financial
Advisor.”
|
|
|
·
|
The
Special Committee and the Board noted that a number of factors
specific to
the situation facing Central make the financial metrics for the
traditional evaluation of fairness more speculative in assessing
the
fairness of the merger consideration to the Unaffiliated Security
Holders.
These factors include the following.
|
|
|
○
|
Central’s
significant operating losses over the last two years which has
caused a
steady decline in Central’s book value and stock price and which decline
management currently estimates will continue into the foreseeable
future
makes the evaluation of the fairness of the $2.25 per share more
speculative.
|
|
|
○
|
Central’s
negative cash flow and negative working capital makes more difficult
the
evaluation of Central’s going-concern value.
|
|
|
○
|
The
lack of comparability with peers in this industry as a result
of Central’s
continuing losses from operations as well as Central’s smaller size in
terms of assets, revenue, earnings and market value in most
cases in
addition to Central’s use of operating leases for many of its terminals
rather than the capital leases and outright ownership of terminals
typical
in the industry.
|
|
|
○
|
The amount of Central Common Stock controlled by Mr. Moyes, the amount of Central Common Stock controlled by the Children’s Trust and Central’s lease arrangements with Southwest Premier and Mr. Moyes for a number of key terminals in Central’s core Southwest region would require the cooperation of Mr. Moyes and the Children’s Trust in any going private or other change in control transaction with a third party, which is not the case in many such transactions. While these interests may have motivated Mr. Moyes to proceed, they may have dampened the interests of any third parties in Central because they would either need to negotiate separately with Mr. Moyes, the Children’s Trust, Southwest Premier and Central to buy all of the Common Stock and terminals of Central or buy a majority of Central’s Common Stock while Mr. Moyes, Southwest Premier and the Children’s Trust maintained some or all their interest in a number of Central’s key terminals and Central Common Stock, respectively. | |
|
·
|
The
factors set forth below relating to the adverse business, market
and
execution risks that we face in operating our business and pursuing
growth
were considered by and contributed to the conclusion of the Special
Committee and our Board that the $2.25 per share offer is fair to
the
Unaffiliated Security Holders. These factors include the
following.
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
○
|
Speculation
within the trucking industry regarding our liquidity and financial
position coupled with the efforts of our competitors to capitalize
on that
speculation has generated a lack of confidence among our customers
and
potential customers that we will be able to continue to serve them,
negatively impacting revenue and contributing to the decline in
the market
value of Central Common Stock. Without additional sources of liquidity,
we
have been unable to address these issues as aggressively as we
wished. In
addition, the need for liquidity may have contributed to a lack
of
competing offers.
|
|
|
○
|
Our
unwillingness to operate at unprofitable rates for some of our former
customers, such as Dell Inc., has resulted in a decline in revenue,
further contributing to the decline in the market value of Central
Common
Stock.
|
|
|
||
|
|
○
|
Uncertainty
over our ability to stop the erosion of our book value, which management
currently believes will continue into the foreseeable future is
contributing to the decline in the market value of Central Common
Stock.
|
|
|
||
|
|
○
|
Continued
significant costs of regulatory compliance facing small public companies
like us contributed to the decline in the market value of Central
Common
Stock.
|
| · | Beginning in the second half of 2004, five specific areas of focus were identified by our management as the foundation of our turnaround plan. These areas were (i) improving revenue yield and total tonnage, (ii) reducing our cost structure to better align controllable costs with our expected revenue base, (iii) streamlining freight movements to consolidate movements and reduce the use of third-party purchased transportation, (iv) improving employee efficiency and (v) reducing insurance and claims expense. Operating results improved in the fourth quarter of 2004 and the first two quarters of 2005, based in large part on improvements in cost structure, consolidation of freight movements, employee efficiency, and insurance and claims. However, by the third quarter of 2005, the improvements in some of these expense-related areas began to deteriorate, and Central began to suffer declines in revenue yield (excluding fuel surcharge revenue) and total tonnage. Management attributes the decline in revenue measures primarily to customer concerns regarding Central’s financial position, which concerns have been fueled by negative analyst reports. Further, as increased amounts of management’s time were focused on addressing these customer concerns and reports, less time was available to focus on implementation of the expense-related areas of the turnaround plan. As a result, Central’s results of operations have suffered and the market value of Central Common Stock has declined. The Merger could prevent Central’s stockholders from losing up to their entire investment in Central, which could result if the Merger is not effected and Central is not able to continue as a going concern. | |
| · | Central’s current priority is establishing sufficient liquidity. Without additional liquidity, Central’s management believes there is a substantial likelihood that Central’s customers and its employee base will not be wholly supportive of Central’s turnaround efforts, and Central’s stockholders could lose up to their entire investment. If liquidity concerns were to be alleviated pursuant to the Merger and the infusion of capital thereafter by entities controlled by Mr. Moyes, which Mr. Moyes is willing to do only if the Merger is consummated, Central’s management believes it could return its full attention to the five-part turnaround plan described above. | |
|
·
|
In
addition to the foregoing, additional factors increase the challenges
we
would face if we remained an independent company and contributed
to the
conclusion by the Special Committee and our Board that the $2.25
per share
offer is fair to the Unaffiliated Security Holders. These factors
include
the following.
|
|
|
|
○
|
The
Special Committee and our Board believe that the amount of Common
Stock
controlled by Mr. Moyes and the Children’s Trust coupled with
Central’s lease arrangements with Southwest Premier and Mr. Moyes for many
key terminals in Central’s core Southwest region has dampened the interest
that any third parties may have in Central. If
a third party did not buy such stock and assets along with the stock
of
the Unaffiliated Security Holders, it may not control Central to
the
degree it would like.
|
|
|
||
|
|
○
|
The
risk that if the Merger is not consummated, members of our management
team
and key employees would ultimately terminate their employment with
us and
seek alternative employment with companies with
higher growth rates, better potential financial returns and better
employment terms and career opportunities, which would further
complicate
our ability to execute our turnaround
plans.
|
|
|
||
|
|
○
|
The
risk that if the Merger is not consummated, the significant general
and
administrative costs of remaining a publicly traded company as a
percentage of our other costs, continuing to divert scarce resources
to
non-revenue generating activities and further adversely impacting
Central’s ability to continue to operate, would negatively affect our
value.
|
|
|
||
|
|
○
|
Difficulties
in achieving growth through acquisition and further adversely impacting
Central’s ultimate goal of operating profitably would continue to cause
the market value of Central Common Stock to decline.
|
|
|
○
|
Our
inability to increase liquidity to improve our cash position pursuant
to
our operations may require additional capital infusions. Even if
Central
were able to obtain capital from other third parties, the terms Central
would have to offer could have an adverse impact on our stock price
and
may further dilute our stockholders’ equity positions.
|
|
|
||
|
|
○
|
The
fact that the Special Committee and our Board believe that NATL has
both
the motivation and the ability to obtain the financing necessary
to
consummate the Merger.
|
|
•
|
The
consideration by our Board and Special Committee of the terms of
the
Merger Agreement, by themselves and in comparison to the terms of
agreements in other similar transactions, contributed to the conclusion
by
the Special Committee and our Board that NATL’s proposal is fair to the
Unaffiliated Security Holders. These terms include the
following.
|
|
|
○
|
The
right of our Board under certain circumstances described below and
in the
Merger Agreement, in connection with the discharge of its fiduciary
duties
to our stockholders, to consider unsolicited acquisition proposals,
to
change its recommendation with respect to the Merger and to terminate
the
Merger Agreement, should we receive an unsolicited proposal that
our Board
or Special Committee determines to be a superior offer.
|
|
|
○
|
The
fact that the Merger Agreement included, as a condition to each party’s
obligations to complete the Merger, a requirement that the Merger
Agreement be approved by a majority of the voting power of the shares
of
our Common Stock held by the Public Stockholders, which gives our
Public
Stockholders the right to approve or disapprove of the Merger and
which
allows the Unaffiliated Security Holders to determine their own destiny
pursuant to the Public Stockholder Vote condition in the Merger
Agreement.
|
|
|
·
|
The
fact that our Board established a Special Committee of independent
directors that considered and approved the transaction while focusing
on
the interests of the Unaffiliated Security Holders.
|
|
·
|
The
fact that, as discussed above, the Merger Agreement must be
approved by a
majority of the voting power of the shares of our Common Stock
voting on
the proposal that are owned by the Public Stockholders, which
serves as a
check on the decision of the Special Committee and our Board
to enter the
Merger Agreement. Directors and executive officers of Central
who are part
of the Public Stockholder Vote requirement own in the aggregate
just
73,000 shares of Central Common Stock, or approximately 0.6%
of the shares
held by Public
Stockholders.
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
The
fact that a nationally recognized law firm with no prior relationship
with
Central was retained as the legal advisor to advise the Special Committee
with respect to the Merger was designed to keep the focus on the
interests
of the Unaffiliated Security Holders.
|
|
·
|
The
fact that the Special Committee actively provided instructions to
its
legal and financial advisors regarding the negotiation of the terms
of the
Merger Agreement, including with respect to negotiating the amount
of the
merger consideration reflects that it took its responsibilities
seriously.
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
The
fact that Morgan Keegan issued its opinion that the merger consideration
is fair, from a financial point of view, to the Unaffiliated Security
Holders supports the conclusion by the Special Committee and our
Board
that NATL’s proposal is fair.
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
The
fact that we solicited interest by other parties likely to be interested
in Central and also received unsolicited inquiries, none of which
resulted
in an alternative proposal.
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
The
fact that the price paid for each share of Central Common Stock owned
by
our executive officers and directors will be the same as the price
per
share received by the Unaffiliated Security Holders (although there
are certain additional interests that certain of our directors and
officers may have). See “Special Factors—Conflicts of Interest and Other
Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger and Certain
Relationships.”
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
The
fact that our Board and Special Committee have retained the right
to
change their recommendations in favor of the Merger if the failure
to do
so would constitute a breach of the Board’s fiduciary duties to Central’s
stockholders protects stockholders in the event that circumstances
change
significantly.
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
The
fact that we are permitted under certain circumstances to respond
to
inquiries regarding acquisition proposals and to terminate the Merger
Agreement in order to complete a superior proposal upon payment of
a $1.0
million termination fee and up to $500,000 of expenses protects the
interests of NATL without precluding another party from proposing
a
superior Acquisition Proposal.
|
|
·
|
The fact that Unaffiliated Security Holders will not participate in any potential future growth of Central, if there is any. | |
|
·
|
The fact that $2.25 is well below Central’s initial public offering price on December 12, 2003 (even though the Common Stock has traded below the initial public offering price of $15.00 per share for approximately 85% of the trading days since that time). | |
|
·
|
The
fact that $2.25 was 84.9% of Central’s book value per share as of
December 31, 2005 could be viewed to weigh against the conclusion
that NATL’s proposal is fair to the Unaffiliated Security Holders,
although Central’s book value per share at July 1, 2006 was $1.66; as such
$2.25 represents a 35.5% premium to book value at July 1,
2006.
|
|
|
·
|
The
risk presented by the Merger of diverting management focus and resources
from taking advantage of strategic opportunities and devoting full
attention to revenue and profit generating activities and operational
matters in order to negotiate and close the transaction with NATL,
could
further materially impair our prospects as an independent company
if the
Merger is not consummated.
|
|
|
·
|
The
risks presented by the Merger of the disruption of our relationships
with
our employees, customers and other third parties could be affecting
our
current results and stock prices.
|
|
|
·
|
The
risk that the Merger might not be consummated for a number of reasons,
including the following.
|
|
|
○
|
If
NATL is unable to obtain financing, notwithstanding its covenants
in the
Merger Agreement, or if we or NATL are unable to satisfy one or more
of
the other closing conditions although the Special Committee and our
Board
believe that this transaction has the best chance of being
completed.
|
|
|
○
|
If
we are unable to settle or resolve the Securities Litigation, the
Derivative Litigation and the Merger Litigation within the limits
set
forth in Central’s applicable insurance policies, which the Special
Committee and our Board did not consider to be likely although it
may be
time-consuming.
|
|
|
·
|
The
fact that under the terms of the Merger Agreement, we cannot solicit
other
acquisition proposals and must pay a termination fee of $1.0 million
and up to $500,000 of expenses if the Merger Agreement is terminated
under
certain circumstances, which, in addition to being costly, might
have the
effect of discouraging other parties from proposing an alternative
transaction that might be more advantageous to our stockholders in
the
Merger, but we do not believe this would preclude competing
offers.
|
|
|
·
|
The
fact that Central must indemnify Mr. Moyes and his affiliates for any
liability, costs and expenses of up to $1.5 million incurred by such
persons in connection with litigation arising out of the negotiation,
approval, execution or performance of the Merger Agreement could
further
erode our liquidity position, although the Special Committee and
our Board
do not believe such obligation is likely to occur.
|
|
|
·
|
The
fact that any gain realized by our stockholders as a result of the
Merger
generally will be taxable for U.S. federal income tax purposes to
all
stockholders that receive the $2.25 per share offer if the Merger
is
consummated may not be a situation certain individual stockholders
wished
to experience.
|
|
|
·
|
The
fact that, pursuant to the Merger Agreement, we must generally conduct
our
business in the ordinary course, and we are subject to a variety
of other
restrictions on the conduct of our business prior to closing of the
Merger
or termination of the Merger Agreement, which may delay or prevent
us from
pursuing business opportunities that may arise or preclude actions
that
would be advisable if we were to remain an independent
company.
|
|
|
·
|
The
fact that NATL, Green, the Affiliated Continuing Investors, Mr. Fasso
and Central’s directors and executive officers may have other interests
related to the Merger that are different from the interests of
the
Unaffiliated Security Holders or that may present a conflict of
interest,
which may be viewed as offsetting the procedural safeguards we
established. See “Special Factors—Conflicts of Interest and Other
Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger and Certain Relationships.”
|
|
|
Multiples
|
Implied
Per-Share Equity Value
|
Offer
|
||||||||||||||
|
Valuation
Methodology
|
Low
|
Median
|
High
|
Low
|
Median
|
High
|
Price
|
Multiple/
Premium
|
||||||||
|
Peer
Group Analysis
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Enterprise
Value / LTM EBITDA
|
5.2
x
|
6.0
x
|
8.8
x
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$2.25
|
NM
|
||||||||
|
Enterprise
Value / FY2005E EBITDA
|
5.0
x
|
5.8
x
|
7.8
x
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$2.25
|
NM
|
||||||||
|
Enterprise
Value / FY2006E EBITDA
|
4.5
x
|
5.2
x
|
6.6
x
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$0.22
|
$2.25
|
10.5
x
|
||||||||
|
Enterprise
Value / LTM EBIT
|
7.3
x
|
11.2
x
|
12.3
x
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$2.25
|
NM
|
||||||||
|
Enterprise
Value / FY2005E EBIT
|
7.1
x
|
9.0
x
|
12.0
x
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$2.25
|
NM
|
||||||||
|
Enterprise
Value / FY2006E EBIT
|
6.6
x
|
7.7
x
|
9.8
x
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$2.25
|
NM
|
||||||||
|
Price
/ Current Book Value
|
1.5
x
|
2.1
x
|
3.5
x
|
$4.84
|
$6.67
|
$11.55
|
$2.25
|
0.7
x
|
||||||||
|
Price
/ FY2005E Book Value
|
1.4
x
|
2.1
x
|
3.4
x
|
$3.74
|
$5.74
|
$9.22
|
$2.25
|
0.8
x
|
||||||||
|
Price
/ FY2006E Book Value
|
1.2
x
|
1.8
x
|
2.7
x
|
$1.71
|
$2.53
|
$3.78
|
$2.25
|
1.6
x
|
||||||||
|
Precedent
Transaction Analysis
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Enterprise
Value / LTM EBITDA
|
2.9
x
|
4.6
x
|
8.0
x
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$2.25
|
NM
|
||||||||
|
Enterprise
Value / LTM EBIT
|
6.4
x
|
9.5
x
|
19.7
x
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$2.25
|
NM
|
||||||||
|
Price
/ Current Book Value
|
0.7
x
|
1.9
x
|
5.8
x
|
$2.20
|
$6.20
|
$18.82
|
$2.25
|
0.7
x
|
||||||||
|
Multiples
|
Implied
Per-Share Equity Value
|
Offer
|
||||||||||||||
|
Valuation
Methodology
|
Low
|
Median
|
High
|
Low
|
Median
|
High
|
Price
|
Multiple/
Premium
|
||||||||
|
Discounted
Cash Flow Analysis
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Terminal
Multiple of EBITDA
|
3.0
x
|
4.0
x
|
5.0
x
|
$2.65
|
$4.83
|
$7.31
|
$2.25
|
NA
|
||||||||
|
Terminal
Multiple of EBIT
|
5.0
x
|
6.0
x
|
7.0
x
|
$2.76
|
$4.27
|
$5.99
|
$2.25
|
NA
|
||||||||
|
Premium
Analysis
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Selected
Trucking Transactions (1)
|
12%
|
39%
|
104%
|
$2.39
|
$2.96
|
$4.33
|
$2.25
|
6%
|
||||||||
|
Selected
Industrial Transactions (1)
|
-99%
|
21%
|
300%
|
$0.02
|
$2.57
|
$8.51
|
$2.25
|
6%
|
|
·
|
The
consideration to be paid to Central’s stockholders receiving cash in the
Merger represents a 24.3% premium over the reported closing sale
price
($1.81) of shares of Central Common Stock on Nasdaq on January 30,
2006,
the last trading day prior to the date on which the Merger was announced,
and a premium of approximately 25.4% over the average closing sale
price
($1.79) of shares of Central Common Stock on Nasdaq during the 30
trading
days prior to January 30, 2006;
|
|
·
|
The
consideration to be paid to Central’s stockholders (other than Affiliated
Continuing Investors) in the Merger is all cash, thus eliminating
any
uncertainty in valuing the consideration to be received by such
stockholders; and
|
|
·
|
The
Merger will provide liquidity for Central’s stockholders (other than the
Affiliated Continuing Investors) without the delays that would otherwise
occur in order to liquidate the positions of larger holders, and
without
incurring brokerage and other costs typically associated with market
sales.
|
|
·
|
The
fact that, as discussed above, the Merger Agreement must be approved
by a
majority of the voting power
of
the shares of Central Common Stock voting on the proposal that are
owned
by the Public Stockholders.
|
|
·
|
The
fact that Central’s Board established a Special Committee of independent
directors to negotiate and review
the transaction;
|
|
·
|
The
fact that Morgan Keegan and Blackwell Sanders were retained as financial
and legal advisors to advise the Special Committee with respect to
the
Merger;
|
| · | The fact that the opinion of Morgan Keegan addresses the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the merger consideration to be received by the Unaffiliated Security Holders; |
|
·
|
The
fact that Central’s
Board solicited interest by other parties likely to be interested
in
Central and also received unsolicited inquiries, none of which resulted
in
an alternative proposal;
|
|
·
|
The
fact that, other than the acceleration and vesting of stock options,
the
payment for cancellation of such options upon the consummation
of
the Merger, fees paid to directors who are not 10% stockholders,
officers
or employees for service on Board committees and for serving as the
chairpersons of those committees as discussed in more detail in “Corporate
Governance—Director Compensation,” and maintenance of indemnification and
insurance coverage as discussed in further detail in “—Conflicts of
Interest and Other Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger and
Certain
Relationships -Indemnification and Insurance,” Central’s executive
officers and directors will not receive any consideration in connection
with the Merger that is different from that received by the Public
Stockholders;
|
|
·
|
The
fact that Central’s Board and Special Committee have retained the right to
change their recommendation
in
favor of the Merger if, among other things, the failure to do so
would
constitute a breach of their fiduciary duties;
|
|
·
|
The
fact that Central is permitted under certain circumstances to respond
to
inquiries regarding acquisition
proposals and to terminate the Merger Agreement in order to complete
a
superior proposal upon payment of a $1.0 million termination fee
and up to
$500,000 of expenses.
|
|
·
|
any
shares held by Central as treasury shares; and
|
|
·
|
any
shares owned by the Affiliated Continuing
Investors.
|
|
·
|
No
stockholder shall transfer any of such stockholder’s
shares of common stock of the surviving corporation without granting
Mr.
Moyes a right of first refusal to acquire such stockholder’s shares of
common stock without the express written consent of Mr. Moyes,
except as
otherwise provided by the Stockholders’ Agreement, which allows
stockholders to make transfers, without the consent of Mr Moyes,
(i) to
the surviving corporation; (ii) to any trust of which such stockholder
is
the trustee and the sole beneficiaries of which are one or more
of such
stockholder and such stockholder’s
spouse, children or step-children; (iii) to any limited partnership
the
general partner of which is the stockholder and the limited partners
of
which are one or more of such stockholder’
and such stockholder’s
spouse, children or step-children, (iv) any limited liability
company of which the stockholder holds a majority of the membership
interests and is the manager or the managing member or (v) in the
case of any stockholder that is not an individual, to a wholly-owned
affiliate of such stockholder (collectively, “Permitted
Transferees”).
|
|
·
|
Stockholders
shall have the right, subject to the terms and conditions set forth
in the
Stockholders’ Agreement, to sell a pro rata portion of their shares of
common stock of the surviving corporation, in the event that Mr.
Moyes
sells any of his interest in the common stock of the surviving
corporation
to a third party purchaser (other than to another Stockholder,
a Permitted
Transferee or to an affiliate of Mr. Moyes) (a “Third Party”) on the same
terms and conditions, including the per share price and the date
of
transfer, as is applicable to Mr. Moyes.
|
| · | Mr. Moyes will have the right, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Stockholders’ Agreement, to require each of the stockholders (and their Permitted Transferees (other than Mr. Moyes and the surviving corporation)) and each of the optionholders to sell a pro rata portion of such stockholder’s shares of common stock of the surviving corporation (including any common stock issuable upon the exercise of any derivative securities), in the event that Mr. Moyes proposes to sell all or part of his shares of common stock of the surviving corporation, to a Third Party (specifically excluding any affiliate of Mr. Moyes) on the same terms and conditions, including the per share price and the date of transfer, as is applicable to Mr. Moyes. |
| · |
Any
stockholder proposing to sell any shares of common stock of the surviving
corporation to a Third Party must provide notice of such sale to
Mr.
Moyes. Mr. Moyes may elect to purchase all of the common stock in
connection with the proposed sale on the same terms set forth in
the
notice of such proposed sale, subject to the terms and conditions
set
forth in the Stockholders' Agreement.
|
| · | If Mr. Moyes approves an initial public offering and sale of common stock or other equity securities (a “Public Offering”) of the surviving corporation pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act, the stockholders and the optionholders will take all necessary or desirable actions in connection with the consummation of the Public Offering. |
| · | The surviving corporation shall provide the stockholders with not less than 10 days’ notice of certain public offerings and sales of common stock or other equity securities of the surviving corporation (an "Offering"), and will use its reasonable best efforts to effect in connection with the Offering, the registration of all of the shares of common stock that each stockholder notifies the surviving corporation within 10 days of such notice to include in such Offering; subject to certain limitations including, (i) the surviving corporation determining for any reason not to register such other securities or (ii) the managing underwriters determining that (A) the selling stockholders should be excluded from the Offering or (B) the number of shares proposed to be sold exceeds the number which can be sold in an orderly manner or without materially adversely affecting the market for the common stock of the surviving corporation in which case the number of shares to be sold by the stockholders will be reduced pro rata. Once Mr. Moyes has recovered all investments, costs and expenses incurred in purchasing Central and funding the operations of the surviving corporation, then the Children’s Trust will be permitted to participate in an Offering on an equal basis with Mr. Moyes, but in no case greater than Moyes and the Children's Trust's combined pro rata portion of the total number of shares of common stock of the surviving corporation that all stockholders have elected to include in such Offering. The stockholders and optionholders will take all necessary or desirable actions in connection with the consummation of the Offering. |
| · |
The
Stockholders’ Agreement may be amended only by a written instrument
approved by the surviving corporation, on the one hand, and on
behalf of
the other parties to the Stockholders’ Agreement by the holders of at
least 60% of the voting power of the surviving corporation owned
by the
parties to the Stockholders’ Agreement (other than the surviving
corporation), on the other hand; provided, however, that,
any amendment which adversely affect the rights or obligations
of the
stockholders thereunder or imposes additional obligations on such
stockholders shall also require the written approval of the holders
of at
least a majority of the voting stock of the surviving corporation
held by
stockholders other than Mr. Moyes; provided, further, that
without the approval of any of the parties thereto, the Stockholders’
Agreement may be amended by the board of directors of the surviving
corporation to, among other things, (i) implement the addition
of
any person as a stockholder, (ii) to satisfy certain legal
requirements and (iii) cure any ambiguity or correct or supplement
any
provision of the Stockholders’ Agreement that may be incomplete or
inconsistent with any other provision contained therein, so long
as such
amendment or supplement does not adversely affect the interests
of Mr.
Moyes or the stockholders
thereunder.
|
| · |
Mr.
Fasso may acquire up to 504,000 shares of common stock of the
surviving
corporation at the current exercise price of $1.35 per
share.
|
|
·
|
The
vesting of options to purchase 51,934 shares of common stock of
the surviving corporation will accelerate such that they will
be
exercisable at the effective time of the Merger, with the remaining
continuing to vest in accordance
with
their original vesting schedule unless Mr. Fasso’s employment is
terminated for any reason, voluntarily or involuntarily, or unless
there
is a sale of assets, a merger or a change in control, in which
case all of
his options will be fully-vested and exercisable on the termination
date.
|
| · | Provisions in Mr. Fasso’s original option agreement relating to a right of repurchase in the event of termination of employment and a right of first refusal prior to a public offering have been deleted since they are either no longer applicable or they are covered by the Stockholders’ Agreement. |
| · | In the event Mr. Moyes proposes to sell all or part of his shares of common stock of the surviving corporation, to a Third Party (specifically excluding any affiliate of Mr. Moyes) then Mr. Moyes may require Mr. Fasso to have all or a portion of his vested options cancelled in exchange for a payment in cash by the Third Party pursuant to the Stockholders’ Agreement on the same terms and conditions, including the per share price and the date of transfer, as is applicable to Mr. Moyes. |
|
Financial
Advisor Fees and Expenses
|
$
|
85,000
|
||
|
SEC
Filing Fees
|
$
|
3,087
|
||
|
Legal
Fees and Expenses
|
$
|
750,000
|
||
|
Accounting
Fees
|
$
|
5,000
|
||
|
Printing
and Mailing Expenses
|
$
|
7,500
|
||
|
Solicitor
Fees and Expenses
|
$
|
10,000
|
||
|
Exchange
Agent Fees
|
$
|
15,000
|
||
|
Other
Fees
|
$
|
34,413
|
(1)
|
|
|
Total
|
$
|
910,000
|
|
·
|
Each
share of Common Stock of Central issued and outstanding immediately
prior
to the effective time of the Merger (other than any shares owned
by the
Affiliated Continuing Investors)
will be cancelled and extinguished and be converted into the right
to
receive $2.25 in cash, without interest, payable to the holder thereof
upon surrender of the certificate representing such share in accordance
with the Merger Agreement;
|
|
·
|
Each
share of Common Stock held by the Affiliated Continuing Investors
will
remain issued and outstanding shares of Central;
|
|
·
|
Each
share of Green common stock will be converted into an amount of Central
Common Stock equal to the quotient obtained by dividing (i) the difference
between (A) all of the issued and outstanding shares of Central Common
Stock immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger and (B)
the
shares held by the Affiliated Continuing Investors, by (ii) the number
of
issued and outstanding shares of Green common stock immediately prior
to
the effective time of the Merger; and
|
|
·
|
All
shares of Central Common Stock held by Central or any of its subsidiaries
as treasury stock prior to the effective time of the Merger will
be
canceled and retired, and no payment or other consideration will
be made
with respect thereto.
|
|
·
|
The
organization and similar corporate matters of NATL, Green, Central
and
Central’s subsidiary;
|
|
·
|
The
capital structure of Central;
|
|
·
|
Required
consents and approvals or conflicts under articles of incorporation,
by-laws or agreements, or violations of law;
|
|
·
|
Permits
and compliance with laws with respect to Central and its
subsidiary;
|
|
·
|
The
accuracy of information supplied by Central, NATL and Green in connection
with this Proxy Statement;
|
|
·
|
The
accuracy of filings made by Central with the SEC under the Exchange
Act
since November 26, 2003;
|
|
·
|
Tax
matters of Central and its subsidiary;
|
|
·
|
Actions
and proceedings affecting Central and its subsidiary;
|
|
·
|
Employee
agreements, benefit plans, employees and other employment related
matters
and practices of Central and its subsidiary;
|
|
·
|
Technology
and intellectual property rights of Central and its
subsidiary;
|
|
·
|
Title
to assets of Central and its subsidiary;
|
|
·
|
Required
stockholder votes with respect to Central;
|
|
·
|
Environmental
matters with respect to Central and its subsidiary;
|
|
·
|
Opinion
of Morgan Keegan as financial adviser to Central;
|
|
·
|
Board
of directors direction that the Merger Agreement and the transactions
contemplated therein by submitted to Central’s stockholders for
approval;
|
|
·
|
Insurance
with respect to Central and its subsidiary; and
|
|
·
|
Non-applicability
of certain provisions of Nevada law related to the
transaction.
|
|
·
|
Enter
into a new line of business or engage in any material
acquisitions;
|
|
·
|
Amend
its Articles of Incorporation or by-laws or any other similar
organizational documents;
|
|
·
|
Declare
or pay any dividends on, or make any other distributions with respect
to
it or its subsidiary’s capital stock or permit it or its or its subsidiary
to adjust, split, combine or reclassify any such capital stock or
issue,
grant, sell, transfer, pledge, dispose of or encumber any of its
capital
stock or redeem, purchase or otherwise acquire any of such capital
stock;
|
|
·
|
Enter
into, adopt or amend or increase the amount or accelerate the payment
or
vesting of any benefit or amount payable under any compensation,
severance, retention, profit sharing, stock option or equity-linked
pension or retirement plan, agreement or arrangement or enter into
or
amend any employment or severance agreement except in accordance
with
existing contracts or agreements, grant any severance or termination
pay
to any officer, director or employee of it or its
subsidiary;
|
|
·
|
Acquire
any assets or securities other than purchases of inventory in the
ordinary
course of business;
|
|
·
|
Sell,
lease, exchange, transfer or dispose of any assets except in the
ordinary
course of business;
|
|
·
|
Mortgage,
pledge, hypothecate, grant any security interest in any
assets;
|
|
·
|
Pay,
discharge or satisfy any material claims or compromise, settle, grant
any
waiver or release relating to, any litigation other than the settlement
of
certain stockholder litigation permitted under the Merger
Agreement;
|
|
·
|
Engage
in any transaction with, or enter into any new agreement, arrangement
or
understanding with any of it’s affiliates;
|
|
·
|
Make
or change any tax election, amend any tax return or settle any tax
liability;
|
|
·
|
Take
any action that would, or could reasonably be expected to, result
in any
of the representations and warranties made by it in the Merger Agreement
becoming untrue, or result in certain of the conditions to the Merger
not
being satisfied, or result in a material adverse effect on
Central;
|
|
·
|
Adopt
or enter into a plan of liquidation, dissolution, merger, consolidation,
restructuring, recapitalization or other reorganization of it or
any of
its subsidiaries;
|
|
·
|
Incur
or assume any debt other than pursuant to existing credit facilities,
capital leases of equipment and purchase money secured debt to purchase
equipment in the ordinary course of business, debt or sale/leasebacks
secured by real property in an aggregate amount in excess of $50
million;
|
|
·
|
Enter
into certain material commitments or transactions that will limit
it or
its subsidiary’s ability to compete with or conduct any business or line
of business;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
Modify,
terminate or enter any material contract; or
|
|
·
|
Enter
into an agreement, contract commitment or arrangement to do any of
the
foregoing.
|
|
·
|
Grant
any approvals or take such actions as required by any “moratorium,”
“control share,” “fair price,” or other antitakeover laws which may become
applicable to the Merger or any related transactions so that the
Merger or
any related transactions may be consummated;
|
|
·
|
Afford
to Green and its authorized representatives, including consultants,
advisors, lenders and financing sources, reasonable access during
normal
business hours upon reasonable prior notice to all of its premises,
properties, contracts, commitments, data, books and records and personnel,
will use its reasonable efforts to cause its customers, suppliers,
lenders
and other creditors to be available to Green for investigation, and
furnish promptly to Green (i) a copy of any document filed or received
by
it before the effective time of the Merger pursuant to the requirements
of
federal or state securities laws and (ii) all other information concerning
its business, properties and personnel as Green may reasonably request;
and
|
|
·
|
Give
prompt notice to NATL of (i) information or developments that could
reasonably be expected to lead to the conclusion that any representation
or warranty made by it was untrue or inaccurate when made or would
reasonably be expected to cause such representation or warranty to
be
untrue or inaccurate as of the closing of the Merger or (ii) the
failure
by it to comply with or satisfy in any material respect any covenant,
condition or agreement to be complied with or satisfied by it under
the
Merger Agreement.
|
|
·
|
Solicit,
initiate or knowingly encourage (including by way of furnishing
non-public
information) any inquiries or the making or of any submission or
any
proposal that constitutes an alternative acquisition
proposal;
|
|
·
|
Participate
or engage in any discussions or negotiations with or disclose any
non-public information to any person that has made an acquisition
proposal
or to any person in contemplation of an acquisition proposal;
or
|
|
·
|
Accept
an alternative acquisition
proposal.
|
|
·
|
It
receives a bona fide unsolicited written proposal from a party other
than
NATL;
|
|
·
|
The
Board determines that it constitutes a Superior Proposal (defined
below)
after receiving such advice from its financial
advisors;
|
|
·
|
The
Board determines in good faith after consultation with outside counsel
that the failure to participate in negotiations with or to furnish
information to the third party would constitute a breach of the Board’s
fiduciary duties; and
|
|
·
|
The
Board provides written notice to NATL that it has received a Superior
Proposal, specifying the material terms and conditions of the proposal
and
identifying the person, entity or group making the
proposal.
|
|
·
|
Central
receives an unsolicited Acquisition Proposal that it believes in
good
faith is a “Superior Proposal”;
|
|
·
|
The
Board determines in good faith based on the advice or its financial
advisors that the transaction proposed by NATL is not at least
as
favorable to Central and its stockholders from a financial point
of view
(taking into account, among other things, all legal, financial,
regulatory
and other aspects of the proposal, identity of the offeror and the
financial capacity of the offeror to consummate the superior proposal)
as
the Superior Proposal;
|
|
·
|
Failure to make an Adverse Recommendation Change would result in a breach of the Board’s fiduciary duties; and |
|
·
|
Central’s Board provides written notice to NATL that it has received a Superior Proposal, specifying the material terms and conditions of the Superior Proposal and identifying the person or group making the Superior Proposal. |
|
·
|
“Acquisition
Proposal” means any bona fide proposal, whether or not in writing, for the
(i) direct or indirect acquisition or purchase of a business or
assets that constitutes 10% or more of the net revenues, net income
or the
assets (based on the fair market value thereof) of Central and its
subsidiary, taken as a whole, (ii) direct or indirect acquisition or
purchase of 10% or more of any
|
| class of equity securities or capital stock of Central or any of its subsidiaries whose business constitutes 10% or more of the net revenues, net income or assets of Central and its subsidiary, taken as a whole, (iii) merger, consolidation, restructuring, transfer of assets or other business combination, sale of shares of capital stock, tender offer, exchange offer, recapitalization, stock repurchase program or other similar transaction that if consummated would result in any person or persons beneficially owning 10% or more of any class of equity securities of Central or any of its subsidiaries whose business constitutes 10% or more of the net revenues, net income or assets of Central and its subsidiary, taken as a whole, other than the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. | |
|
·
|
“Superior
Proposal” means any bona fide written acquisition proposal that was not
solicited by Central or any of its subsidiaries or any of their respective
officers, directors, investment bankers, attorneys, accountants,
financial
advisors, agents or other representatives, made by a third party
to
purchase all of the outstanding equity securities of Central pursuant
to a
tender offer, exchange offer or merger (i) which a majority of the
Board determines in good faith after receiving the advice of its
independent financial and legal advisors (A) to be superior to
Central and its stockholders (in their capacity as stockholders)
from a
financial point of view as compared to the transactions contemplated
by
the Merger Agreement and to any alternative transaction proposal
made by
NATL, and (B) which is likely to be consummated on its terms and
(ii) for which all requisite financing is fully
committed.
|
|
·
|
No
statute, rule, order, decree or regulation has been enacted or
promulgated, and no action has been taken, by any governmental entity
of
competent jurisdiction which temporarily, preliminarily or permanently
restrains, precludes, enjoins or otherwise prohibits the consummation
of
the Merger or makes the Merger illegal;
|
|
·
|
The
Merger has been approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of
a
majority of the outstanding shares of Central and the affirmative
vote of
a majority of the outstanding shares of Central owned by the Public
Stockholders;
|
|
·
|
Other
than filing the Articles of Merger with the Nevada Secretary of State
in
accordance with the Nevada Revised Statutes, all consents and approvals
of
all governmental entities required to be obtained prior to consummation
of
the Merger have been obtained, except for such authorizations, consents,
and approvals the failure of which to be obtained individually or
in the
aggregate would not have or result in a material adverse effect on
any
party to the Merger Agreement;
|
|
·
|
The
representations and warranties of the other party set forth in the
Merger
Agreement are true and correct as of the closing of the Merger;
and
|
|
·
|
The
performance in all material respects by each party of their obligations
under or pursuant to the Merger Agreement, which are required to
be
performed by them at or prior to the
Merger.
|
|
·
|
NATL
has received the proceeds of financing in an amount sufficient
to pay the
Merger consideration and all of the fees and expenses related to
the
Merger and related transactions (the Merger Agreement was amended
on
September 13, 2006 deleting this condition);
|
|
·
|
The
execution by Mr. Fasso of the Subscription Agreement and Stockholders’
Agreement (the Merger Agreement was amended on September 13, 2006
deleting
this condition to the extent it applies to the Subscription
Agreement);
|
| · |
All
conditions precedent in the Subscription Agreement in
favor of Central, as the surviving corporation, shall have been
satisfied
(the Merger Agreement was amended on September 13, 2006 deleting
this
condition);
|
|
·
|
No
suit, action or proceeding (i) seeking to prohibit or limit in any
material respect the ownership or operation by Central, NATL or Green
of a
substantial portion of the business assets of Central or its subsidiary;
(ii) to require any material portion of the business or assets of
Central
and its subsidiary to be disposed
of or held separate; or (iii) to restrain, preclude, enjoin or prohibit
the Merger or any related transaction, is then
pending;
|
|
·
|
All
(i) stockholder derivative actions, (ii) securities class actions
and
(iii) actions brought by stockholders based on a breach of duty in
connection with the transaction contemplated by the Merger Agreement
in
any case brought against Central or its officers or directors, which
currently consists of the Securities Litigation, Derivative Litigation
and
Merger Litigation described in the section of this Proxy Statement
entitled “Special Factors—Background of the Merger—Litigation”, have been
settled for an aggregate amount within Central’s applicable insurance
policies and without further liability of Central, its officers,
directors
or other indemnified parties; and
|
|
·
|
All
material consents and approvals necessary to the consummation of
the
Merger and any related transactions have been
obtained.
|
|
·
|
the
Merger is not completed on or before November 30, 2006
(this date reflects the amendment to the Merger Agreement on
September 13, 2006), provided that the right to terminate the Merger
Agreement for this reason is not available to a party whose failure
to
fulfill any material obligation of the Merger Agreement is the
cause of or
results in the failure to consummate the merger on or before November
30,
2006 (this date reflects the amendment to the Merger Agreement
on
September 13, 2006);
|
|
·
|
any
statute, rule, order, decree or regulation is issued, or other action
is
taken by, a governmental entity which permanently restrains, enjoins
or
otherwise prohibits the Merger and is final and not-appealable;
or
|
|
·
|
Central’s
stockholders do not approve the Merger Agreement, except that Central’s
right to terminate the Merger Agreement for this reason shall not
apply if
the reason for the stockholders’ failure to approve is due to the breach
of the obligations of Central or its Board described herein under
“The
Merger Agreement—Restrictions on Negotiating and Entering into Alternative
Transactions and on Withdrawing the Recommendation with Respect to
the
Merger,” or because Central fails to hold the stockholders meeting
required to seek approval of the Merger Agreement and the related
transactions.
|
|
·
|
If
there is a material violation, breach or any inaccuracy in any
of the
representations, warranties, covenants or agreements of
NATL:
|
|
·
|
That
renders the satisfaction of any conditions to the obligation of
Central
impossible and Central does not waive the violation or breach;
and
|
|
·
|
The
violation or breach is not cured within thirty days after NATL
receives
written notice of the breach from Central or which by its nature
cannot be
cured by November 30, 2006 (this
date reflects the amendment to the Merger Agreement on September
13,
2006).
|
|
·
|
If,
under the circumstances set forth in “The Merger Agreement—Restrictions on
Negotiating and Entering into Alternative Transactions and on Withdrawing
the Recommendation with Respect to the Merger,” Central complies with its
obligations described therein with respect to accepting or recommending
a
Superior
Proposal and it pays NATL the $1.0 million termination fee and
up to
$500,000 in reimbursement of expenses as described
below.
|
|
·
|
There
is a material violation, breach or any inaccuracy in any of the
representations, warranties, covenants or agreements of
Central:
|
|
|
○
|
That
renders the satisfaction of any conditions to the obligation of NATL
impossible and NATL does not waive the violation or breach;
and
|
|
|
○
|
Which
violation or breach is not cured within thirty days after Central
receives
written notice of the breach from NATL or which by its nature cannot
be
cured by November 30, 2006. (This date reflects the amendment to the
Merger Agreement on September 13, 2006).
|
|
|
·
|
Central’s
Board or any committee thereof (including the Special Committee)
shall
have made an Adverse Recommendation Change, Central shall have entered
into an Alternative Definitive Agreement, or Central, its Board or
any
committee thereof (including the Special Committee) shall have resolved
to
do any of the foregoing.
|
|
|
·
|
NATL
terminates the Merger Agreement because Central has made an Adverse
Recommendation Change; or
|
|
·
|
Central
terminates the Merger Agreement due to entering into an Alternative
Definitive Agreement.
|
|
·
|
An
Acquisition Proposal is proposed by any person other than NATL or
Green or
any such person announces its intention to make an Acquisition Proposal
and thereafter the Merger Agreement is terminated by:
|
|
|
○
|
Central
or NATL because the Merger does not close by November 30, 2006
(this date
reflects the amendment to the Merger Agreement on September 13,
2006);
|
|
○
|
Central
or NATL because Central’s stockholders fail to approve the Merger
Agreement and the transactions contemplated therein at the Central
stockholders meeting; or
|
|
|
○
|
NATL
due to Central’s failure to perform its covenants or agreements that make
the satisfaction of NATL’s conditions
impossible.
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
July 1,
2006
|
|
|
July
2,
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
2004
|
2003(2)
|
2002(2)
|
2001
|
|||||||||
|
(unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(in
thousands, except per share amounts and operating
data)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Statements
of Operations Data:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Operating
revenues
|
$
|
164,434
|
$
|
188,840
|
$
|
372,140
|
$
|
386,601
|
$
|
389,696
|
$
|
371,445
|
$
|
395,702
|
||||||||
|
Operating
expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Salaries,
wages, and benefits
|
90,904
|
104,946
|
208,846
|
222,230
|
205,393
|
209,302
|
233,571
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Purchased
transportation
|
19,288
|
17,947
|
36,217
|
42,152
|
38,113
|
28,806
|
31,739
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Purchased
transportation — related parties
|
3,223
|
7,953
|
14,627
|
14,571
|
18,582
|
21,106
|
17,708
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Operating
and general supplies and expenses
|
43,850
|
43,704
|
91,806
|
82,702
|
66,144
|
59,270
|
67,193
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Operating
and general supplies and expenses — related parties
|
137
|
197
|
305
|
274
|
12
|
286
|
53
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Insurance
and claims
|
10,080
|
11,761
|
22,890
|
25,186
|
16,057
|
14,576
|
14,607
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Building
and equipment rentals
|
2,157
|
2,026
|
4,279
|
4,297
|
3,181
|
3,241
|
3,493
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Building
and equipment rentals — related parties
|
896
|
898
|
1,809
|
1,795
|
1,903
|
1,779
|
1,600
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Goodwill
impairment(3)
|
-
|
-
|
4,324
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
8,667
|
9,594
|
18,169
|
17,049
|
16,605
|
17,974
|
21,241
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Loss
(gains) on sales of operating assets
|
(1,982
|
)
|
(590
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||
|
Total
operating expenses
|
177,220
|
198,436
|
403,272
|
410,256
|
365,990
|
356,340
|
391,205
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Operating
(loss) income
|
(12,786
|
)
|
(9,596
|
)
|
(31,132
|
)
|
(23,655
|
)
|
23,706
|
15,105
|
4,497
|
|||||||||||
|
Interest
expense
|
(2,411
|
)
|
(1,653
|
)
|
(3,860
|
)
|
(1,469
|
)
|
(3,547
|
) |
(4,916
|
) |
(5,620
|
) | ||||||||
|
Interest
expense — related parties(4)
|
(3,093
|
)
|
(3,126
|
)
|
(6,177
|
)
|
(6,197
|
)
|
(6,130
|
) |
(6,359
|
) |
(5,888
|
) | ||||||||
|
(Loss)
income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
(18,290
|
)
|
(14,375
|
)
|
(41,169
|
)
|
(31,321
|
)
|
14,029
|
3,830
|
(7,011
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Income
tax benefit (expense) (5)
|
-
|
-
|
1,686
|
8,473
|
(1,759
|
)
|
1,412
|
119
|
||||||||||||||
|
Income
tax expense-conversion to C corporation
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(9,834
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||
|
(Loss)
income from continuing operations
|
(18,290
|
)
|
(14,375
|
)
|
(39,483
|
)
|
(22,848
|
)
|
2,436
|
5,242
|
(6,892
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Loss
from discontinued operations
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(8,341
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||
|
Net
(loss) income
|
$
|
(18,290
|
)
|
$
|
(14,375
|
)
|
$
|
(39,483
|
)
|
$
|
(22,848
|
)
|
$
|
(5,905
|
)
|
$
|
5,242
|
$
|
(6,892
|
)
|
||
|
Pro
Forma C Corporation Data:(6)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Historical
income (loss) from continuing operations before income
taxes
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
14,029
|
$
|
3,830
|
$
|
(7,011
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Pro
forma (provision) benefit for income taxes attributable to continuing
operations
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(5,666
|
)
|
(2,781
|
)
|
1,108
|
|||||||||||||
|
Pro
forma income (loss) from continuing operations
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
8,363
|
$
|
1,049
|
$
|
(5,903
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Loss
from discontinued operations
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(8,341
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||
|
Pro
forma net income (loss)
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
22
|
$
|
1,049
|
$
|
(5,903
|
)
|
|
Six
Months
Ended
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
July 1,
2006
|
|
|
July 2,
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
2004
|
2003(2)
|
2002(2)
|
2001
|
|||||||||
|
(unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(in
thousands, except per share amounts and operating
data)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net
loss per share
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
$
|
(1.00
|
)
|
$
|
(0.79
|
)
|
$
|
(2.17
|
)
|
$
|
(1.27
|
)
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||
|
Diluted
|
(1.00
|
)
|
(0.79
|
)
|
(2.17
|
)
|
(1.27
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
18,293
|
18,203
|
18,230
|
17,971
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Diluted
|
18,293
|
18,203
|
18,230
|
17,971
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Pro
forma income (loss) from continuing operations per share:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
0.75
|
$
|
0.10
|
$
|
(0.54
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Diluted
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0.69
|
0.09
|
(0.54
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
11,163
|
10,868
|
10,916
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Diluted
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
12,103
|
11,548
|
10,916
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Other
Financial Data:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Capital
expenditures(7)
|
$
|
829
|
$
|
1,601
|
2,050
|
36,717
|
7,024
|
6,008
|
10,186
|
|||||||||||||
|
Operating
Data:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
LTL
revenue per hundredweight(8)
|
$
|
11.76
|
$
|
11.64
|
$
|
11.83
|
$
|
11.63
|
$
|
11.37
|
$
|
10.42
|
$
|
10.06
|
||||||||
|
Total
tons hauled
|
805,346
|
917,987
|
1,784,522
|
1,908,621
|
1,962,890
|
2,120,080
|
2,388,816
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Operating
ratio(9)
|
107.8
|
%
|
105.1
|
%
|
108.4
|
%
|
106.1
|
%
|
93.9
|
%
|
95.9
|
%
|
98.9
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Balance
Sheet Data (at period end):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
63
|
$
|
312
|
$
|
348
|
$
|
2,144
|
$
|
37,269
|
$
|
7,350
|
$
|
187
|
||||||||
|
Net
property and equipment
|
96,062
|
126,464
|
111,349
|
135,274
|
114,693
|
126,751
|
139,954
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total
assets
|
152,834
|
210,660
|
174,831
|
237,254
|
223,149
|
196,401
|
195,877
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Long-term
debt, capital leases, and related party financing, including current
portion
|
46,437
|
51,625
|
53,726
|
55,694
|
49,517
|
103,054
|
111,270
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Stockholders’
equity
|
30,354
|
73,345
|
48,386
|
87,558
|
108,438
|
30,374
|
23,302
|
|
(1) This
selected financial data should be read in conjunction with (a) the
audited
financial statements contained in Central’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, and (b) the unaudited financial
statements contained in Central’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended July 1, 2006 accompanying this Proxy Statement.
|
|
(2) Our
financial results for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, included
a
$2.9 million reduction in depreciation expense resulting from a January
2002 change in useful lives and salvage values of trailers and pick-up
and
delivery tractors based on our historical experience, which might
materially affect the comparability of the information presented,
and a
$725,000 restructuring charge representing the cost to close 21 terminals.
Our financial results for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003,
included the following items that might materially affect the
comparability of the information presented: (a) a $0.6 million reduction
in depreciation expense (in addition to the 2002 reduction) resulting
from
a January 2003 additional change in useful lives and salvage values
of
trailers and line tractors based on our historical experience; (b)
a $7.8
million gain attributable to the amendment of a benefit plan; and
(c) a
$3.8 million expense related to an increase in our claims accruals
relating to accident, workers’ compensation, and other claims in which the
underlying events occurred prior to 2003.
|
|
(3) In
2005, an annual impairment test of our goodwill, required by GAAP,
determined that the carrying value exceeded its fair value thereby
requiring that we write off the remaining net book value of approximately
$4.3 million.
|
|
(4) Effective
February 20, 2003, the payments for certain of the facilities we
lease
from a related party were increased to reflect fair market value.
The
lease is reflected as a financing arrangement in our consolidated
financial statements. Accordingly, our interest expense-related parties
includes approximately $3.3 million in annual non-cash interest expense
and contributed capital in all periods prior to February 20, 2003.
|
|
(5) In
2004, the Internal Revenue Service disallowed certain tax deductions
taken
by our S corporation stockholders pursuant to a contested liability
trust.
As a result, our tax basis was increased, resulting in a deferred
tax
benefit of $1.8 million. Also in 2004, we recorded a deferred tax
asset
valuation allowance of approximately $4.9
million.
|
|
(6) In
1998, we elected to be treated as an S corporation for federal income
tax
purposes. An S corporation passes through essentially all taxable
earnings
and losses to its stockholders and does not pay federal income taxes
at
the corporate level. Historical income taxes consist mainly of state
income taxes. On November 1, 2003, we converted into a C corporation.
For
comparative purposes, we have included a pro forma (provision) benefit
for
income taxes assuming we had been taxed as a C corporation in all
periods
when our S corporation election was in effect. In June 2002, we reversed
approximately $1.8 million of tax reserves which were originally
recorded
in 1998 when we elected to be treated as an S corporation. The $1.8
million tax benefit has been excluded for purposes of presenting
pro forma
C corporation income taxes.
|
|
(7) Includes
$0.8 million of capital expenditures in 2002 attributable to the
operations of Central Refrigerated Service, Inc., which we divested
on
December 31, 2002.
|
|
(8) Average
revenue we receive for transporting 100 pounds of
freight.
|
|
(9) Operating
expenses as a percentage of operating
revenues.
|
|
Fiscal
Year 2004
|
High
|
Low
|
|||||
|
First
Quarter
|
$
|
19.32
|
$
|
11.94
|
|||
|
Second
Quarter
|
$
|
13.23
|
$
|
7.14
|
|||
|
Third
Quarter
|
$
|
8.20
|
$
|
5.40
|
|||
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
$
|
7.25
|
$
|
5.32
|
|||
|
Fiscal
Year 2005
|
|||||||
|
First
Quarter
|
$
|
7.50
|
$
|
2.95
|
|||
|
Second
Quarter
|
$
|
3.88
|
$
|
2.35
|
|||
|
Third
Quarter
|
$
|
3.32
|
$
|
1.69
|
|||
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
$
|
2.31
|
$
|
1.50
|
|||
|
Fiscal
Year 2006
|
|||||||
|
First
Quarter
|
$
|
2.14
|
$
|
1.50
|
|||
|
Second
Quarter
|
$
|
2.04 |
$
|
1.58 | |||
| Third Quarter |
$
|
2.15 |
$
|
1.75 | |||
| Fourth Quarter (through October, 2006) | $ | ____ |
$
|
____ |
|
Name
|
Business
Address, Telephone Number and Principal Occupation
|
|
Jerry
Moyes
|
Mr. Moyes
is the founder and has been the sole owner of NATL since its formation.
Mr. Moyes’ business address is c/o Swift Aviation Group, Inc., 2710 E. Old
Tower Road, Phoenix, Arizona 85034 and his business telephone is
(602) 273-7704. His
principal occupation is Chairman of the Board of Directors of Swift
Aviation Group, Inc.
|
|
Name
|
Business
Address, Telephone Number and Principal Occupation
|
|
Jeff
Shumway
|
Mr.
Shumway currently serves as the sole manager of NATL and as the Chief
Operating Officer for Mr. Moyes’ private holdings. In that capacity, Mr.
Shumway manages all of Mr. Moyes’ private business activities, real estate
developments and investments. Mr. Shumway has served in this capacity
since 2003. Since April 13, 2006, Mr. Shumway has also served as the
Chief Executive Officer of the Phoenix Coyotes of the National Hockey
League. Prior to these positions, Mr. Shumway worked with numerous
start-up businesses in both legal and management capacities from
1997 to
2003. Mr. Shumway was with the Arizona law firm of Lewis & Roca
from 1994 to 1997 specializing in corporate litigation. Before joining
Lewis & Roca, Mr. Shumway was with the national law firm of Skadden,
Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom from 1990 to 1994 based in their Delaware
office. Mr. Shumway’s business address is c/o Swift Aviation Group, Inc.,
2710 E. Old Tower Road, Phoenix, Arizona 85034 and his business telephone
is (602) 273-7704.
|
|
Name
|
Business
Address, Telephone Number and Principal Occupation
|
|
Jerry
Moyes
|
Mr. Moyes
is the founder and has been a director of Green since its formation.
See
also the information provided above under “Members of
NATL.”
|
|
Jeff
Shumway
|
Mr.
Shumway has been a director and the President, Secretary and
Treasurer of Green since its formation. See also the information
provided above under “Executive Officers of
NATL.”
|
|
Name
|
Business
Address, Telephone Number and Principal Occupation
|
|
Jeff
Shumway
|
See
the information provided above under “Executive Officers of
NATL.”
|
|
Robert
V. Fasso, 53
|
Director
Since 2002
|
|
John
Breslow, 57
|
Director
Since 2003
|
|
John
Campbell Carruth, 75
|
Director
Since 2004
|
|
Porter
J. Hall, 63
|
Director
Since 2003
|
|
Name
|
Audit
Committee
|
Compensation
Committee
|
Nominating
and
Corporate
Governance
Committee
|
|||
|
John
Breslow
|
x
|
x
|
x
|
|
Cam
Carruth
|
|
x
|
|
x
|
|
x
|
|
Porter
J. Hall
|
|
x
|
|
x
|
|
x
|
|
·
|
Is
independent under NASD Rule 4200(a)(15);
|
|
·
|
Meets
the criteria for independence set forth in Rule 10A-3(b)(1) under
the
Exchange Act;
|
|
·
|
Did
not participate in the preparation of the financial statements of
Central
or any current subsidiary of Central at any time during the past
three
years; and
|
|
·
|
Is
able to read and understand fundamental financial statements, including
Central’s balance sheet, income statement and cash flow
statement.
|
|
·
|
Reviewed
and discussed the audited financial statements with management and
McGladrey & Pullen, LLP, Central’s independent
auditors;
|
|
·
|
Discussed
with the auditors the matters required to be disclosed by Statement
on
Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended, “Communication with Audit
Committees or Others with Equivalent Authority and Responsibility”;
and
|
|
·
|
Received
the written disclosures and the letter from the independent auditors
required by Independence Standards Board Statement No. 1, as amended,
“Independence Discussions with Audit Committees,” and discussed with the
independent auditors the independent auditors’
independence.
|
|
Audit
Committee
|
|
|
Porter
J. Hall, Chairman
|
|
|
John
Breslow, Member
|
|
|
John
Campbell Carruth, Member
|
|
·
|
All
director nominees should be committed to Central’s basic beliefs as set
forth in Central’s Code of Conduct and Ethics and should be individuals of
integrity, intelligence, and strength of character;
|
|
·
|
All
director nominees should have reputations, both personal and professional,
consistent with the image and reputation of Central;
|
|
·
|
All
director nominees should have strong leadership skills;
|
|
·
|
All
director nominees should have the ability to exercise sound business
judgment;
|
|
·
|
All
director nominees should have relevant expertise and experience,
including
educational or professional backgrounds, and should be able to offer
advice and guidance to management of Central based on that expertise
and
experience;
|
|
·
|
All
director nominees should have a willingness to commit the necessary
time
and effort to attend and participate in Board meetings and related
Board
activities;
|
|
·
|
To
the extent necessary to ensure that a majority of the Boards is
independent, non-employee director nominees should be “independent” as
defined by Rule 4200 of the NASDAQ Stock Market listing requirements,
qualify as a “non-employee director” as defined in Section 16 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, be free of any relationship that,
in the
Board’s discretion, would interfere with the nominee’s independent
judgment, and comply with all of Central’s corporate governance guidelines
and principles as amended from time to
time;
|
|
·
|
Non-employee
director nominees also should maintain the independence necessary
for an
unbiased evaluation of management performance;
|
|
·
|
Non-employee
director nominees should effectively oversee Central’s strategy, goals and
progress;
|
|
·
|
Non-employee
director nominees should have a working knowledge of corporate governance
issues and the changing role of boards;
|
|
·
|
Non-employee
director nominees should have demonstrated management and/or business
skills or experience that will contribute substantially to the management
of Central;
|
|
·
|
Non-employee
director nominees should have a general understanding of marketing,
finance, and other disciplines relevant to the success of a
publicly-traded company in the current business environment;
and
|
|
·
|
Non-employee
director nominees should have an understanding of Central’s business and
the general trucking or transportation industry, or the willingness
and
ability to develop such an
understanding.
|
|
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
|
Robert
V. Fasso
|
53
|
Chief
Executive Officer and President
|
|
Walter
D. Ainsworth
|
53
|
Executive
Vice President
|
|
Jeffrey
A. Hale
|
46
|
Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
Richard
Stolz
|
56
|
Senior
Vice President - Sales and
Marketing
|
|
Annual
Compensation
|
Long-term
Compensation
|
|||||||||
|
Awards
|
Payouts
|
|||||||||
|
Name
and
Principal
Position
|
Year
|
Salary
($)(1)
|
Bonus
($)
|
Other
Annual Compensation
($)
|
Restricted
Stock
Award(s)
($)
|
Securities
Underlying Options
(#)
|
LTIP
Payouts
|
All
Other
Compensation
($)(2)
|
||
|
Robert
V. Fasso
President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
2005
2004
2003
|
350,000
362,382
348,077
|
--
--
126,000(3)
|
--
--
2,686,706(4)
|
--
--
--
|
--
--
--
|
--
--
--
|
19,411
14,708
12,973
|
||
|
Walter
D. Ainsworth(5)
Executive
Vice President
|
2005
2004
2003
|
300,000
132,393
--
|
--
240,000(6)
--
|
--
--
--
|
--
--
--
|
--
150,000
--
|
--
--
--
|
20,312
58,257
--
|
||
|
Jeffrey
A. Hale
Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
2005
2004
2003
|
215,379
180,652
172,115
|
--
--
50,000(3)
|
--
--
--
|
--
--
--
|
--
--
--
|
--
--
--
|
14,152
13,533
11,625
|
||
|
Richard
Stolz(7)
Senior
Vice President- Sales and Marketing
|
2005
2004
2003
|
203,077
--
--
|
--
--
--
|
--
--
--
|
--
--
--
|
100,000
--
--
|
--
--
--
|
16,186
--
--
|
||
|
(1)
|
Includes
amounts deferred pursuant to our 401(k) plan. Due to timing, salary
payments in 2004 included one additional payroll
amount.
|
|
(2)
|
Consists
of: (a) excess life insurance paid for Mr. Fasso ($828 in 2005, $6,951
in
2004 and $690 in 2003), Mr. Ainsworth ($828 in 2005), Mr. Hale ($540
in
2005, $254 in 2004 and $254 in 2003), and Mr. Stolz ($1,290 in 2005);
(b)
personal use of a company car for Mr. Fasso ($5,833 in 2005, $6,677
in
2004 and $6,113 in 2003), Mr. Ainsworth ($8,266 in 2005 and $2,120
in
2004), Mr. Hale ($12,022 in 2005, $12,199 in 2004 and $10,576 in
2003),
and Mr. Stolz ($2,561 in 2005), (c) moving costs for Mr. Ainsworth
($8,708 in 2005 and $55,837 in 2004) and Mr. Stolz ($12,335 in 2005)
and
(d) other insurance premiums paid for Mr. Fasso ($12,750 in 2005,
$1,080
in 2004 and $6,170 in 2003), Mr. Ainsworth ($2,510 in 2005 and $300
in
2004), and Mr. Hale ($1,590 in 2005, $1,080 in 2004 and $795 in
2003).
|
|
(3)
|
Consists
of bonuses earned in 2003 and paid in 2004.
|
|
(4)
|
Consists
of ordinary income recognized in 2003 by Mr. Fasso under federal
income
tax guidelines upon exercise of vested incentive stock options. No
cash
was received by Mr. Fasso. The stock options were granted to Mr.
Fasso in
2002 pursuant to our Incentive Stock Plan.
|
|
(5)
|
Mr.
Ainsworth was hired in July 2004, and amounts included in the table
above
for 2004 are for July to December of that year.
|
|
(6)
|
Consists
of a bonus earned in 2004, one half of which was paid in 2004 and
one half
of which was paid in January 2005.
|
|
(7)
|
Mr.
Stolz was hired in March 2005, and amounts included in the table
above for
2005 are for March to December of that
year.
|
|
Individual
Grants
|
|||||||||||
|
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Options
|
Percent
of
Total
Options
Granted
to
Employees
|
Exercise
price
|
Expiration
|
Potential
Realizable Value
at
Assumed Annual Rates
of
Stock Price
Appreciation
for Option
Term(3)
|
|||||||
|
Name
|
Granted
(#)(1)
|
in
Fiscal Year(2)
|
($/Sh)
|
Date
|
5%
($)
|
10%
($)
|
|||||
|
Robert
V. Fasso
|
0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||
|
Walter
D. Ainsworth
|
0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||
|
Jeffrey
A. Hale
|
0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||
|
Richard
Stolz
|
100,000
|
34.2%
|
$
2.61
|
04/06/2015
|
$
164,141
|
$
415,967
|
|||||
|
(1)
|
Each
option represents the right to purchase one share of Common Stock
under
our incentive stock plan.
|
|
(2)
|
During
2005, we granted employees options to purchase an aggregate of 292,500
shares of Common Stock.
|
|
(3)
|
We
show the potential realizable values net of the options’ exercise price,
but before the payment of taxes associated with exercise. Potential
realizable values are based on a fair market value at the date of
grant of
$2.61 per share for the underlying Common Stock. The potential realizable
values represent hypothetical gains if the holders exercised their
options
at the end of the option term. The SEC’s rules provide the assumed 5% and
10% annual rates of stock price appreciation and measure the appreciation
from the grant date.
|
| Name
|
Shares
Acquired
on
Exercise
(#)
|
|
|
Value
Realized
($)
|
|
|
Number
of Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
at FY-End (#) Exercisable
Unexercisable |
|
|
Value
of Unexercised
In-the-Money
Options at FY-End ($) (1)
Exercisable
Unexercisable
|
|||||||||
|
Robert
V. Fasso
|
—
|
—
|
252,000
|
252,000
|
$
|
108,360
|
$
|
108,360
|
|||||||||||
|
Walter
D. Ainsworth
|
—
|
—
|
150,000
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|||||||||||||
|
Jeffrey
A. Hale
|
—
|
—
|
60,000
|
40,000
|
25,800
|
17,200
|
|||||||||||||
|
Richard
Stolz
|
—
|
—
|
100,000
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|||||||||||||
|
(1)
|
Based
on the $1.78 per share closing price of our Common Stock on December
30,
2005.
|
|
·
|
We
can grant incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, bonus
stock, reload options or any other stock-based award to employees,
officers, directors, consultants and any other person determined
by the
Board to have performed services for or on behalf of Central which
merit
the grant of an award.
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
We
reserved 5,000,000 shares of Common Stock for issuance under the
plan and
have outstanding options covering 1,426,953 of those shares as of
March 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
Our
Board or its designated committee administers the plan and makes
all
grants thereunder.
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
Options
that are canceled, forfeited, expire, or are tendered for tax withholding
or to pay the exercise price become available again for use under
the
plan.
|
|
Compensation
Committee
|
|
|
John
Breslow, Chairman
|
|
|
John
Campbell Carruth, Member
|
|
|
Porter
J. Hall, Member
|

|
Name
and Address of Beneficial Owner(1)
|
Amount
and Nature
of
Beneficial
Ownership(2)
|
Percent
of Class(2)
|
|||||
|
Jerry
and Vickie Moyes(3)
|
5,770,351
|
31.5
|
%
|
||||
|
Contrarian
Capital Management, L.L.C.(4)
|
1,282,128
|
7.0
|
%
|
||||
|
Robert
V. Fasso(5)
|
1,134,000
|
6.1
|
%
|
||||
|
John
Breslow(6)
|
83,000
|
*
|
|||||
|
John
Campbell Carruth(7)
|
30,000
|
*
|
|||||
|
Porter
J. Hall(8)
|
20,000
|
*
|
|||||
|
Walter
D. Ainsworth(9)
|
150,000
|
*
|
|||||
|
Jeffrey
A. Hale(10)
|
80,000
|
*
|
|||||
|
Richard
Stolz(11)
|
100,000
|
*
|
|||||
|
All
directors and executive officers as a group (7 persons)
|
1,597,000
|
8.4
|
%
|
||||
|
(1)
|
Unless
otherwise indicated, the business address of the persons named in
the
above table is care of Central Freight Lines, Inc., 5601 West Waco
Drive,
Waco, Texas 76710.
|
|
(2)
|
For
purposes of this table, a person or group of persons is deemed to
have
“beneficial ownership” of any shares which such person has the right to
acquire within sixty days. Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement,
each option to purchase shares of Central Common Stock that is outstanding
immediately prior to the Merger will become fully exercisable at
that
time. See the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “The Merger
Agreement—Stock Options”. For purposes of computing the percentage of
outstanding shares held by each person or group of persons named
above,
any security which such person or group of persons has the right
to
acquire within sixty days is deemed to be outstanding for the purpose
of
computing the percentage ownership for such person or persons, but
is not
deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage
ownership of any other person. As a result, the denominator used
in
|
| calculating the beneficial ownership among our stockholders may differ, but are not deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. |
|
(3)
|
Includes 16,000 shares beneficially owned under options that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within sixty days. Of the shares attributed to Jerry Moyes, 1,046,002 are held by Jerry and Vickie Moyes as trustees of the Family Trust, 4,708,348 are held by Gerald F. Ehrlich, as trustee of the Children’s Trust, and 16,001 shares (including 16,000 shares under option) are held by Mr. Moyes individually. Mr. Ehrlich has sole voting and investment power for the Children’s Trust. Mr. Moyes disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by Mr. Ehrlich, as trustee of the Children’s Trust. |
|
(4)
|
As
reported on Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on March 6, 2006. The
business
address of Contrarian Capital Management, L.L.C., as reported in
such
Schedule 13G, is 411 West Putnam Avenue, Suite 225, Greenwich, CT
06830.
|
|
(5)
|
Includes
378,000 shares beneficially owned under options that are currently
exercisable or will become exercisable within sixty days. Mr. Fasso’s
business telephone number is (480) 361-5295.
|
|
(6)
|
Includes
(a) 50,000 shares held by Linweld, Inc. and (b) 20,000 shares beneficially
owned under options that are currently exercisable or will become
exercisable within sixty days. The business address of Mr. Breslow
is 2900
South 70th Street, Suite 400, Lincoln, NE 68506.
|
|
(7)
|
Includes
20,000 shares beneficially owned under options that are currently
exercisable or will become exercisable within sixty days. The business
address of Mr. Carruth is 316 Rivershire Court, Lincolnshire, IL
60069.
|
|
(8)
|
Includes
20,000 shares beneficially owned under options that are currently
exercisable or will become exercisable within sixty days. The business
address of Mr. Hall is 2825 East Cottonwood Parkway, Suite 300, Salt
Lake
City, UT 84121.
|
|
(9)
|
Includes
150,000 shares beneficially owned under options that are currently
exercisable or will become exercisable within sixty days.
|
|
(10)
|
Includes
80,000 shares beneficially owned under options that are currently
exercisable or will become exercisable within sixty days.
|
|
(11)
|
Includes
100,000 shares beneficially owned under options that are currently
exercisable or will become exercisable within sixty
days.
|
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||
|
Audit
Fees(1)
|
$
|
256,318
|
$
|
994,625
|
|||
|
Audit-Related
Fees
|
--
|
--
|
|||||
|
Tax
Fees
|
--
|
--
|
|||||
|
All
Other Fees(2)
|
--
|
--
|
|||||
|
Total
|
$
|
256,318
|
$
|
994,625
|
|||
|
(1)
|
Audit
Fees. Audit fees were for professional services rendered for the
audit and
quarterly reviews of the Company’s financial statements for the applicable
fiscal year.
|
|
(2)
|
All
Other Fees. For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2005, and December
31,
2004, the Company was not billed for any other services.
|
|
(1)
|
Central’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2005;
|
|
(2)
|
Central’s
Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended April 1,
2006 and
July 1, 2006; and
|
| (3) | Central’s Current Reports on Form 8-K filed during 2006 on January 30, February 3, April 3, April 17, April 24, June 20, August 15, September 19 and September 21. |
|
Central
Freight Lines, Inc.
|
|
|
Robert
V. Fasso
|
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer and President
|
|
|
October
__, 2006
|
|
|
Page
|
||
|
ARTICLE
I THE MERGER
|
A-1
|
|
|
|
||
|
1.1
|
The
Merger
|
A-1
|
|
1.2
|
Closing
|
A-1
|
|
1.3
|
Articles
of Incorporation; Bylaws
|
A-2
|
|
1.4
|
Directors
and Officers of the Surviving Corporation
|
A-2
|
|
|
||
|
ARTICLE
II CONVERSION OF SHARES
|
A-2
|
|
|
|
||
|
2.1
|
Conversion
of Capital Stock
|
A-2
|
|
2.2
|
Exchange
of Certificates.
|
A-3
|
|
2.3
|
Change
in Shares
|
A-4
|
|
2.4
|
Company
Option Plans.
|
A-4
|
|
|
||
|
ARTICLE
III REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE COMPANY
|
A-5
|
|
|
|
||
|
3.1
|
Organization.
|
A-5
|
|
3.2
|
Capitalization.
|
A-5
|
|
3.3
|
Authorization;
Validity of Agreement.
|
A-6
|
|
3.4
|
No
Violations; Consents and Approvals.
|
A-7
|
|
3.5
|
SEC
Reports and Financial Statements.
|
A-8
|
|
3.6
|
Restatement.
|
A-9
|
|
3.7
|
Absence
of Certain Changes.
|
A-9
|
|
3.8
|
Absence
of Undisclosed Liabilities.
|
A-10
|
|
3.9
|
Proxy
Statement; Schedule 13E-3; Merger Documents.
|
A-10
|
|
3.10
|
Employee
Benefit Plans; ERISA.
|
A-11
|
|
3.11
|
Litigation;
Compliance with Law.
|
A-13
|
|
3.12
|
Intellectual
Property.
|
A-14
|
|
3.13
|
Contracts.
|
A-15
|
|
3.14
|
Taxes.
|
A-15
|
|
3.15
|
Environmental
Matters.
|
A-17
|
|
3.16
|
Assets.
|
A-18
|
|
3.17
|
Real
Property.
|
A-18
|
|
3.18
|
Insurance.
|
A-19
|
|
3.19
|
Labor
Matters.
|
A-19
|
|
3.20
|
Affiliate
Transactions.
|
A-19
|
|
3.21
|
Brokers.
|
A-20
|
|
3.22
|
Opinion
of Financial Advisor.
|
A-20
|
|
|
||
|
ARTICLE
IV REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARENT AND THE
PURCHASER
|
A-20
|
|
|
|
||
|
4.1
|
Organization.
|
A-20
|
|
4.2
|
Authorization;
Validity of Agreement
|
A-20
|
|
4.3
|
Consents
and Approvals; No Violations.
|
A-21
|
|
4.4
|
Information
in Proxy Statement; Schedule 13E-3; Merger Documents
|
A-21
|
|
4.5
|
Broker
|
A-21
|
|
|
||
|
ARTICLE
V COVENANTS
|
A-22
|
|
|
|
||
|
5.1
|
Interim
Operations of the Company
|
A-22
|
|
5.2
|
Acquisition
Proposals.
|
A-24
|
|
5.3
|
Takeover
Statute
|
A-27
|
|
5.4
|
Access
to Information and Properties.
|
A-27
|
|
5.5
|
Further
Action; Reasonable Efforts.
|
A-27
|
|
5.6
|
Proxy
Statement; Schedule 13E-3; Stockholders’ Meeting.
|
A-28
|
|
5.7
|
Notification
of Certain Matters
|
A-29
|
|
5.8
|
Directors’
and Officers’ Insurance and Indemnification.
|
A-30
|
|
5.9
|
Publicity
|
A-30
|
|
5.10
|
Indemnity
|
A-31
|
|
5.11
|
Stockholders’
Agreement and Subscription Agreement
|
A-31
|
|
|
||
|
ARTICLE
VI CONDITIONS
|
A-31
|
|
|
|
||
|
6.1
|
Conditions
to Each Party’s Obligation to Effect the Merger
|
A-31
|
|
6.2
|
Conditions
to the Obligation of the Company to Effect the Merger
|
A-32
|
|
6.3
|
Conditions
to Obligations of Parent and the Purchaser to Effect the
Merger
|
A-32
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE
VII TERMINATION
|
A-33
|
|
|
|
||
|
7.1
|
Termination
|
A-33
|
|
7.2
|
Effect
of Termination
|
A-35
|
|
|
||
|
ARTICLE
VIII MISCELLANEOUS
|
A-35
|
|
|
|
||
|
8.1
|
Fees
and Expenses.
|
A-35
|
|
8.2
|
Amendment;
Waiver.
|
A-36
|
|
8.3
|
Notices
|
A-36
|
|
8.4
|
Interpretation;
Definitions
|
A-37
|
|
8.5
|
Headings;
Schedules
|
A-43
|
|
8.6
|
Counterparts
|
A-43
|
|
8.7
|
Entire
Agreement
|
A-44
|
|
8.8
|
Severability
|
A-44
|
|
8.9
|
Governing
Law
|
A-44
|
|
8.10
|
Assignment
|
A-44
|
|
8.11
|
Parties
in Interest.
|
A-44
|
|
8.12
|
Specific
Performance.
|
A-44
|
|
Acceptable
Confidentiality Agreement
|
A-25,
A-38
|
Material
Adverse Effect
|
A-40
|
|
|
Acquisition
Proposal
|
A-26,
A-38
|
Material
Contract
|
A-15,
A-41
|
|
|
Adverse
Recommendation Change
|
A-25,
A-38
|
Merger
|
A-1,
A-41
|
|
|
Agreement
|
A-1,
A-38
|
Merger
Consideration
|
A-2,
A-41
|
|
|
Alternative
Definitive Agreement
|
A-38
|
Moyes
Stockholders
|
A-41
|
|
|
Articles
of Incorporation
|
A-2,
A-38
|
Moyes
Stockholders Shares
|
A-2,
A-41
|
|
|
Articles
of Merger
|
A-1,
A-38
|
Notice
of Superior Proposal
|
A-25,
A-41
|
|
|
Assets
|
A-18,
A-38
|
NRS
|
A-1,
A-41
|
|
|
Balance
Sheet
|
A-10,
A-38
|
Outside
Date
|
A-41
|
|
|
Board
|
A-1,
A-38
|
Owned
Real Property
|
A-41
|
|
|
Business
Day
|
A-38
|
Parent
|
A-1,
A-41
|
|
|
Bylaws
|
A-2,
A-38
|
Paying
Agent
|
A-3,
A-41
|
|
|
Capital
Budget
|
A-22,
A-38
|
Permits
|
A-14,
A-41
|
|
|
Certificates
|
A-3,
A-38
|
Permitted
Liens
|
A-41
|
|
|
Closing
|
A-1,
A-38
|
Person
|
A-42
|
|
|
Closing
Date
|
A-1,
A-38
|
Plans
|
A-11,
A-42
|
|
|
Code
|
A-38
|
Preferred
Stock
|
A-5,
A-42
|
|
|
Company
|
A-1,
A-38
|
Proxy
Statement
|
A-28,
A-42
|
|
|
Company
Common Stock
|
A-2,
A-38
|
Public
Stockholders
|
A-42
|
|
|
Company
SEC Documents
|
A-8,
A-38
|
Purchaser
|
A-1,
A-42
|
|
|
Confidentiality
Agreement
|
A-27,
A-39
|
Purchaser
Common Stock
|
A-2,
A-42
|
|
|
Credit
Agreement
|
A-22,
A-39
|
Real
Property
|
A-42
|
|
|
Disclosure
Letter
|
A-5,
A-39
|
Release
|
A-42
|
|
|
Effective
Time
|
A-1,
A-39
|
Required
Vote
|
A-42
|
|
|
Employment
and Withholding Taxes
|
A-39
|
Return
|
A-42
|
|
|
Environmental
Claim
|
A-39
|
Schedule
13E-3
|
A-29,
A-42
|
|
|
Environmental
Laws
|
A-39
|
SEC
|
A-7,
A-42
|
|
|
ERISA
|
A-11,
A-39
|
Secretary
of State
|
A-1,
A-42
|
|
|
ERISA
Affiliate
|
A-11,
A-39
|
Securities
Act
|
A-8,
A-42
|
|
|
ERISA
Plans
|
A-11,
A-39
|
Shares
|
A-2,
A-42
|
|
|
Exchange
Act
|
A-8,
A-39
|
SPD
|
A-11,
A-42
|
|
|
Expenses
|
A-39
|
Special
Committee
|
A-1,
A-42
|
|
|
GAAP
|
A-8,
A-40
|
Stock
Option Plans
|
A-4,
A-43
|
|
|
Governmental
Entity
|
A-7,
A-40
|
Stock
Options
|
A-4,
A-43
|
|
|
Hazardous
Substance
|
A-40
|
Stockholders’
Agreement
|
A-42
|
|
|
Indemnified
Merger Parties
|
A-31,
A-40
|
Stockholders’
Meeting
|
A-29,
A-43
|
|
|
Indemnified
Merger Party
|
A-40
|
Subscription
Agreement
|
A-43
|
|
|
Indemnified
Parties
|
A-30,
A-40
|
Subsidiary
|
A-43
|
|
|
Intellectual
Property
|
A-14,
A-40
|
Superior
Proposal
|
A-26,
A-43
|
|
|
Investing
Stockholder
|
A-40
|
Surviving
Corporation
|
A-1,
A-43
|
|
|
Laws
|
A-7,
A-40
|
Tax
|
A-43
|
|
|
Leased
Real Property
|
A-40
|
Technology
|
A-14,
A-43
|
|
|
Leases
|
A-40
|
Termination
Fee
|
A-35,
A-43
|
|
|
Liens
|
A-40
|
Transaction
Litigation
|
A-31,
A-43
|
|
|
Litigation
|
A-13,
A-40
|
WARN
Act
|
A-19,
A-43
|
|
Central
Freight Lines, Inc.
|
|
|
15333
North Pima Road
|
|
|
Suite
230
|
|
|
Scottsdale,
AZ 85260
|
|
|
Telephone:
(480) 361-5289
|
|
|
Facsimile:
(480) 361-5297
|
|
|
Attention:
John C. Carruth
|
|
|
with
a copy to:
|
|
|
Blackwell
Sanders Peper Martin LLP
|
|
|
4801
Main Street, Suite 1000
|
|
|
Kansas
City, MO 64112
|
|
|
Telephone:
(816) 983-8000
|
|
|
Facsimile:
(816) 983-8080
|
|
|
Attention:
Jeffrey T. Haughey, Esq.
|
|
North
American Truck Lines, LLC
|
|
|
2710
E. Tower Rd.
|
|
|
Phoenix,
AZ 85034
|
|
|
Telephone:
(602) 225-3712
|
|
|
Facsimile:
(602) 275-6417
|
|
|
Attention:
Jeff A. Shumway
|
|
|
with
a copy to:
|
|
|
Skadden,
Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
|
|
|
Four
Times Square
|
|
|
New
York, New York 10036
|
|
|
Telephone:
(212) 735-3000
|
|
|
Facsimile:
(212) 735-2000
|
|
|
Attention:
Stephen F. Arcano, Esq.
|
|
NORTH
AMERICAN TRUCK LINES, LLC
|
||
|
By:
|
/s/
Jeff A. Shumway
|
|
|
Name:
|
Jeff
A.
Shumway
|
|
|
Title:
|
Manager
|
|
|
GREEN
ACQUISITION COMPANY
|
||
|
By:
|
/s/
Jeff A. Shumway
|
|
|
Name:
|
Jeff
A.
Shumway
|
|
|
Title:
|
President
|
|
|
CENTRAL
FREIGHT LINES, INC.
|
||
|
By:
|
/s/
J.
C. Carruth
|
|
|
Name:
|
J.
C.
Carruth
|
|
|
Title:
|
Director
|
|
|
NORTH
AMERICAN TRUCK LINES, LLC
|
||
|
By:
|
/s/ Jeff A. Shumway | |
|
Name:
|
Jeff A. Shumway | |
|
Title:
|
President | |
|
GREEN
ACQUISITION COMPANY
|
||
|
By:
|
/s/ Jeff A. Shumway | |
|
Name:
|
Jeff A. Shumway | |
|
Title:
|
President | |
|
CENTRAL
FREIGHT LINES, INC.
|
||
|
By:
|
/s/ Robert V. Fasso | |
|
Name:
|
Robert V. Fasso | |
|
Title:
|
Chief Executive Officer and President | |
|
Very
truly yours,
|
|
|
/s/
Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc.
|
|
|
MORGAN
KEEGAN & COMPANY, INC.
|
|
1.
|
Approval
of the Agreement and Plan of Merger, by and among Central Freight
Lines,
Inc., North American Truck Lines, LLC and Green Acquisition Company
dated
as of January 30, 2006, as
amended:
|
|
[
] FOR
|
[
]
AGAINST
|
[
]
ABSTAIN
|
|
2.
|
Approval
of the adjournment of the annual meeting, if necessary or appropriate,
to
provide time to solicit additional proxies if it does not appear
that
there will be enough shares voted in favor of the Merger Agreement
to
approve it at the time of the Annual Meeting:
|
|
[
] FOR
|
[
]
AGAINST
|
[
]
ABSTAIN
|
|
3.
|
Election
of Directors:
|
[
] FOR
all nominees listed below
(except as marked to the contrary below)
|
[
] WITHHOLD
AUTHORITY
to
vote for all nominees listed below
|
|
Robert
V. Fasso
|
John
Campbell Carruth
|
|
John
Breslow
|
Porter
J. Hall
|
|
Dated
__________________________________, 2006
|
|
| __________________________________________________ | |
| __________________________________________________ | |
|
Signature(s)
|
|
|
Please
date and sign exactly as name(s) appear(s) on your Common Stock
certificate(s). If shares are held jointly, each owner should sign
this
proxy. If acting as an executor, administrator, trustee, custodian,
guardian, etc., you should so indicate in signing. If the stockholder
is a
corporation or other business entity, the proxy should indicate the
full
legal name of the corporation or entity, and be signed by a duly
authorized officer (indicating his or her
position).
|