UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012

Commission file number: 001-11497

AUTOINFO, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware |  | 13-2867481
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |  | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

6413 Congress Ave – Suite 260

Boca Raton, Florida 33487

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: 561 - 988 - 9456

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $.001 par value

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined by Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.

Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨ |  | Accelerated filer ¨ Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ¨ No x

The aggregate market value of the voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as June 29, 2012, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was (based upon the closing price on the Nasdaq OTC Bulletin Board of $ 0.85 per share) approximately $7,186,000.

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant's common stock, $.001 par value, as of March 22, 2013, was 34,343,215 shares.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None.

AUTOINFO, INC.

Annual Report on Form 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

|  | Page
PART I |  | 2
Item 1. | Business | 2
Item 1A. | Risk Factors | 9
Item 1B. | Unresolved Staff Comments | 16
Item 2. | Properties | 16
Item 3. | Legal Proceedings | 16
Item 4. | Mine Safety Disclosure | 16
PART II |  | 16
Item 5. | Market for our Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Purchases of Equity Securities | 16
Item 6. | Selected Consolidated Financial Data | 17
Item 7. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 18
Item 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About market Risk | 27
Item 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data | 27
Item 9. | Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures | 27
Item 9A | Controls and Procedures | 27
Item 9B. | Other Information | 28
PART III |  | 28
Item 10. | Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance | 28
Item 11. | Executive Compensation | 33
Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters | 37
Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence | 39
Item 14. | Principal Accounting Fees and Services | 39
PART IV |  | 40
Item 15. | Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules | 40

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENT INFORMATION

Certain statements made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, regarding the plans and objectives of management for future operations. Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements included herein are based on current expectations that involve numerous risks and uncertainties. Our plans and objectives are based, in part, on assumptions involving judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive and market conditions and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond our control. Although we believe that our assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions could prove inaccurate and, therefore, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements included in this report will prove to be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included herein particularly in view of the current state of our operations, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a statement by us or any other person that our objectives and plans will be achieved. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the factors set forth herein under the sections entitled “Business,” “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, which discloses all material factors known to us that we believe could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason.

PART I

Item 1. BUSINESS

Overview

Through our wholly-owned subsidiaries, Sunteck Transport Group, Inc. (“Sunteck”), E-Transport Group, Inc. and Equipment Finance Solution, Inc., AutoInfo, Inc., a Delaware corporation (collectively, “we,” “us,” “our” or “AutoInfo”), is a non-asset based transportation services company, providing transportation capacity and related transportation services to shippers throughout the United States and Canada. As a non-asset based provider of brokerage and contract carrier transportation services, we do not own any equipment and our services are provided through our strategic alliances with less than truckload, truckload, air, rail, ocean common carriers and independent owner-operators to service our customers’ needs. Our services include ground transportation coast to coast, local pick-up and delivery, air freight and ocean freight. Our business services emphasize safety, information coordination and customer service and are delivered through a network of independent commissioned sales agents and third party capacity providers coordinated by us. The independent commissioned sales agents typically enter into exclusive contractual arrangements with Sunteck and are responsible for locating freight and coordinating the transportation of the freight with customers and capacity providers. The third party capacity providers consist of independent contractors who provide truck capacity to us, including owner-operators who operate under our contract carrier license, air cargo carriers and railroads.

We operate in two business segments, non-asset based transportation services and agent support services. The non-asset based transportation services segment includes our brokerage and contract carrier services which are provided through a network of independent sales agents throughout the United States and Canada. Revenue in this segment is generated from freight transportation transactions.

The agent support services segment includes an array of services that we provide to our agent network to support and encourage the expansion of our agents’ businesses, primarily financial support through interest bearing long-term loans, sales-type leases (which facilitate the acquisition of trucks by owner-operators), and non-interest bearing short-term loans, as well as other services including training, margin analysis, marketing assistance, industry and market segment data and business analysis tools. Revenue in this segment consists primarily of interest earned on interest bearing loans and profits and interest earned on sales-type leases.

On July 8, 2011, we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Acquisition Agreement”) with Eleets Transportation Company, Inc., a Florida corporation (the “Significant Agent”), to acquire substantially all of the operations of the Significant Agent’s truck agent business. This principally consisted of the future revenue stream generated by independent agents, customers and owner-operators already under contract with us and operating under our authorities and licenses, which were managed by the Significant Agent, and for which the Significant Agent received 100% of the net revenue earned. The purchase price totaled approximately $10 million and principally consisted of an unconditional release and discharge of the Significant Agent from approximately $9.4 million of indebtedness due to us plus the assumption of certain liabilities. The impact of this acquisition on our 2011 financial statements and operating results was, for the period July through December, to reduce interest income earned on the discharge of indebtedness, decrease commission expense and increase direct operating expenses associated with the operation of the acquired truck agent business.

As a non-asset based provider of brokerage and contract carrier transportation services, we do not own any equipment and our services are provided through our strategic alliances with less than truckload, truckload, air, rail, ocean common carriers and independent owner-operators to service customers’ needs. Our brokerage and contract carrier services are provided through a network of independent sales agents throughout the United States and Canada. During our most recently completed fiscal year, we generated revenue, income from operations and net income of approximately $278.2 million, $7.4 million and $4.4 million, respectively.

2

Strategy

Our strategy is to continue to expand through affiliations with independent sales agents and through internal expansion. We have expanded our sales agent network to include representatives throughout the United States and Canada. In addition, we have experienced internal expansion as many of our existing agents have expanded their customer base and increased the number of transactions they generate. We intend to seek, on a selective basis, additional acquisitions of businesses that have services which complement and expand our existing services, and provide us with strategic distribution locations or attractive customer bases. Our ability to implement our growth strategy will be dependent on our ability to identify and affiliate with these agents on mutually acceptable terms.

Recent Developments – Entry into Merger Agreement for the Potential Sale of AutoInfo

On February 28, 2013, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), by and among Autoinfo, AutoInfo Holdings, LLC., a Delaware limited liability company (“Parent”), and AutoInfo Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (“Merger Sub”), pursuant to which Merger Sub shall be merged with and into Autoinfo, and the separate corporate existence of Merger Sub shall thereupon cease, and Autoinfo shall continue as the surviving corporation (the “Surviving Corporation”) and a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (the “Merger”). The Merger Agreement was unanimously approved by our Board of Directors (the “Board”), based on the recommendation of a Special Committee of the Board (the “Special Committee”) that was formed to evaluate and negotiate the terms of the sale.

At the time the Merger becomes effective pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement and under Delaware law (the “Effective Time”): (a) each share of capital stock of Merger Sub issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be converted into and become one validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable share of common stock of the Surviving Corporation, (b) each share of our common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (other than shares owned by Autoinfo, Parent or Merger Sub, and shares owned by our stockholders who have perfected and not withdrawn a demand for appraisal rights under Delaware law) will automatically be cancelled and converted into the right to receive $1.05 in cash, without interest (the “Merger Consideration”); and (c) each option outstanding (whether or not then vested or exercisable) that represents the right to acquire shares of our common stock will be cancelled and terminated whereby the holder of any such options to acquire our common stock shall receive an amount for each such option equal to the excess, if any, of (i) the Merger Consideration over (ii) the exercise price payable in respect of such share of common stock issuable upon exercise of such options.

The Merger Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and covenants. The consummation of the Merger is subject to customary conditions, including, without limitation, (a) approval by the holders of a majority of our outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote on the Merger and (b) the absence of any law, order, injunction or other legal restraint prohibiting the Merger. Moreover, each party’s obligation to consummate the Merger is subject to certain other conditions, including, without limitation, (i) the accuracy of the other party’s representations and warranties (subject to customary qualifiers), (ii) the other party’s compliance with its covenants and agreements contained in the Merger Agreement (subject to customary qualifiers), (iii) certain required consents having been obtained, (iv) there not being any Company Material Adverse Effect (as defined in the Merger Agreement), and (v) there not being holders of more than 5% of the shares of our common stock with respect to which appraisal rights have been properly exercised.

3

From the date of the Merger Agreement, we are subject to customary “no-shop” restrictions on our ability to solicit or respond to alternative takeover proposals from third parties, furnish information to and engage in discussions with third parties regarding alternative takeover proposals, recommend an alternative takeover proposal or enter into an agreement with respect to an alternative takeover proposal. The “no-shop” provision, however, is subject to a customary “fiduciary-out” provision, which provides that, at any point prior to the time stockholder approval is obtained, the Board may change its recommendation to our stockholders or enter into a definitive agreement with respect to an unsolicited, bona fide takeover proposal, if and only if, prior to taking such action, the Board has determined in good faith, after consultation with independent financial advisors and outside legal counsel, (a) that failure to take such action would violate the directors’ fiduciary duties to our stockholders under Delaware law and (b) that the Takeover Proposal (as defined in the Merger Agreement) constitutes a Superior Proposal(as defined in the Merger Agreement); provided, however, that (a) we have given Parent at least five (5) business days’ prior written notice of its intention to take such action and has provided a copy of the relevant proposed transaction agreements disclosing the party making such Takeover Proposal, (b) we have negotiated in good faith with Parent during such five (5) business day notice period (to the extent Parent wishes to negotiate) to enable Parent to revise the terms of the Merger Agreement such as to cause such Takeover Proposal to no longer constitute a Superior Proposal, (c) following the end of such five (5) business day notice period, the Board will have considered in good faith any changes to the Merger Agreement proposed in writing by Parent and will have determined that the Superior Proposal would continue to constitute a Superior Proposal if such revised terms offered by Parent were given effect, and (d) in the event of any changes to the terms of such Superior Proposal, we shall have delivered to Parent an additional notice and a new five (5) business day notice period.

The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights for us and Parent, including our right under certain circumstances to terminate the Merger Agreement to accept a Superior Proposal and enter into a definitive agreement with respect thereto. Upon termination of the Merger Agreement under specified circumstances, including termination of the Merger Agreement to accept a Superior Proposal and enter into a definitive agreement with respect thereto, we are required to pay Parent a termination fee of $1.5 million and reimburse Parent for out-of-pocket expenses actually incurred not to exceed $1.25 million. Upon termination of the Merger Agreement by us under certain specified circumstances, Parent and Merger Sub are required to pay us a termination fee of $1.5 million.

The representations, warranties and covenants made in the Merger Agreement (a) have been made only for purposes of the Merger Agreement, (b) have been qualified by confidential disclosures made to Parent and Merger Sub in connection with the Merger Agreement, (c) are subject to materiality qualifications contained in the Merger Agreement which may differ from what may be viewed as material by investors, (d) were made only as of the date of the Merger Agreement or such other date as is specified in the Merger Agreement and (e) have been included in the Merger Agreement for the purpose of allocating risk between the contracting parties rather than establishing matters as facts. Accordingly, the Merger Agreement is included with this filing only to provide investors with information regarding the terms of the Merger Agreement, and not to provide investors with any other factual information regarding us or our business. Investors should not rely on the representations, warranties and covenants or any descriptions thereof as characterizations of the actual state of facts or condition. Moreover, information concerning the subject matter of the representations and warranties may change after the date of the Merger Agreement, which subsequent information may or may not be fully reflected in our public disclosures.

The foregoing descriptions of the Merger Agreement does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Merger Agreement, a copy of which is filed as Exhibit 2.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 5, 2013, and the terms of which are incorporated herein by reference. . The Merger Agreement should not be read alone, but should instead be read in conjunction with the other information regarding us that is or will be contained in, or incorporated by reference into, the Forms 10-K, Forms 10-Q and other documents that we file with the SEC.

The Board, acting upon the recommendation of the Special Committee, has approved the adoption of the Merger Agreement and consummation of the Merger and recommended adoption of the Merger Agreement and consummation of the Merger by our stockholders. The transactions contemplated under the Merger Agreement are expected to close in the second quarter of 2013.

4

As a condition to Parent entering into the Merger Agreement, on February 28, 2013, Peter C. Einselen, Mark K. Patterson, Thomas C. Robertson, Harry Wachtel, Mark Weiss, Michael P. Williams and William I. Wunderlich, in each case a stockholder and/or an option holder of AutoInfo and members of our management and/or members of the Board, entered into a voting agreement with Parent (the “Voting Agreement”), whereby each voting stockholder party to the Voting Agreement agreed to vote all of the shares of our common stock beneficially owned (or of record) by such voting stockholder, including, but not limited to, any shares of common stock that such voting stockholder has the right to vote due to any agreement, proxy or other similar right (i) in favor of adoption of the Merger Agreement and in favor of the Merger, (ii) against (A) any proposal made in opposition to adoption of the Merger Agreement or in competition or inconsistent with the Merger or any other Transaction (as defined in the Merger Agreement), (B) any Takeover Proposal, (C) any change in ourmanagement or the Board (other than as contemplated by the Merger Agreement), and (D) any action or agreement that the voting stockholders party to the Voting Agreement actually knows, or reasonably expects, would result in a breach of any representation, warranty, covenant or agreement or any other obligation of us under the Merger Agreement or of such voting stockholder party to the Voting Agreement. The voting stockholder parties to the Voting Agreement own approximately 22.3% of the voting power of shares entitled to vote on the Merger.

The foregoing description of the Voting Agreement does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Voting Agreement, a copy of which is filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 5, 2013, and the terms of which are incorporated herein by reference.

Company background

AutoInfo was organized under the laws of the State of New York in 1976 and reincorporated under the laws of Delaware in 1987. In December 2000, we acquired Sunteck in a merger transaction.

The industry

Prior to the mid 1980’s, the trucking industry was regulated by the Interstate Commerce Commission. Deregulation brought new breath and life to the industry. This also brought with it the problem of how to navigate the transportation highway. Shippers found it difficult to locate carriers and carriers found that it was expensive to find freight. Enter the third party transportation providers-intermediaries (freight brokers, freight forwarders and logistics providers). The third party intermediary connects the shipper and the carrier and helps manage the flow of goods.

The present market for freight moved by truck is estimated to exceed $200 billion per year. This is a highly fragmented industry comprised of common carriers, contract carriers, freight forwarders and freight brokers.

The actual movement of goods is accomplished by trucking (consisting of local, over the road, truckload, and less than truckload shipments), air freight (time sensitive in nature), rail freight (non time sensitive in nature and usually less expensive than truck) and ocean freight (generally in freight containers on ships). Other services provided include warehousing and distribution.

There are several trends which are relevant to the continued dependency upon and growth of the trucking industry:

· | Just in time service | With new technology and a premium on cost savings, businesses are able to maintain smaller inventories, thereby reducing carrying costs and warehouse space requirements. The impact on the freight industry is more shipments of smaller quantities that are more time sensitive and, therefore, more costly.
· | Outsourcing | Companies have found it to be more cost effective and efficient to eliminate company owned truck fleets and rely upon others to handle their trucking and shipping needs.

5

· | Logistics | Small to medium size businesses, with less frequent shipping requirements, utilize logistics providers (freight brokers, etc.) to manage all aspects of the transportation, warehousing and delivery needs.

The market for third party logistics providers is highly fragmented. It is comprised primarily of full service logistics providers, freight brokers, independent sales agents and sales representatives. Sales agents often work out of home-based offices or small regional sales offices and affiliate themselves with full service brokers to provide back-office services including load dispatching, bonding and licensing, billing, collection and other administrative services. Sales representatives vary from experienced people with years of freight industry experience and established client relationships to telemarketing personnel cold calling shippers and dispatchers.

Third party logistics companies provide numerous services to clients on an outsourced basis, by contract and on demand. The continued growth of this industry has created secondary market opportunities to provide low-cost delivery to the endpoint, in addition to supply chain services of warehousing, inventory management and electronic interface with customers and suppliers. Third party logistics companies provide customized domestic and international freight transportation of customers’ goods and packages via truck, rail, airplane and ship, and provide warehousing and storage of those goods. Many companies utilize information systems and expertise to reduce inventories, cut transportation costs, speed delivery and improve customer service. The third-party logistics services business has been bolstered in recent years by the competitiveness of the global economy, which causes shippers to focus on reducing handling costs, operating with lower inventories and shortening inventory transit times. Using a network of transportation, handling and storage providers in multiple transportation modes, third-party logistics services companies seek to improve their customers’ operating efficiency by reducing their inventory levels and related handling costs. Many third-party logistics service providers are non-asset-based, primarily utilizing physical assets owned by others in multiple transport modes.

The third-party logistics services business increasingly relies upon advanced information technology to link the shipper with its inventory and as an analytical tool to optimize transportation solutions. This trend favors the larger, more professionally managed companies that have the resources to support a sophisticated information technology infrastructure. By outsourcing all non-core business services to third party providers, companies can help to control costs, eliminate staff and focus on internal business.

Operations and systems

In our brokerage services, our sales agents throughout the United States and Canada receive customers’ freight requirements daily. All agents make appropriate carrier arrangements for the pick-up and timely delivery of customers’ freight.

In our contract carrier services, our sales agents receive customers’ freight requirements daily and, utilizing their respective owner-operators, make appropriate carrier arrangements for the pick-up and timely delivery of customers’ freight. In addition, utilizing various sources, including numerous internet based freight posting boards, our agents locate additional freight to maximize utilization of available capacity and minimize deadhead miles, or miles driven generating little or no revenue.

Our sales agents vary in level of experience from agents with years of freight industry experience and established client relationships to a more limited number of inexperienced telemarketing and operations personnel working under the direct supervision and training of experienced sales agents and dispatchers.

The agent support services segment includes an array of services that we provide to our agent network to support and encourage the expansion of our agents’ businesses, primarily financial support through interest bearing long-term loans, sales-type leases (which facilitate the acquisition of trucks by owner-operators), and non-interest bearing short-term loans, as well as other services including training, margin analysis, marketing assistance, industry and market segment data, and business analysis tools. Revenue in this segment consists primarily of interest earned on interest bearing loans and profits and interest earned on sales-type leases.

6

We rely exclusively on independent third parties for our hauling capacity. These third party capacity providers consist of our independent owner-operators, unrelated trucking companies, air cargo carriers and railroads. Our use of capacity provided by our independent owner-operators, and other third party capacity providers, allows us to maintain a lower level of capital investment, resulting in lower fixed costs.

We utilize a state-of-the-art proprietary internet based order entry system. All agents access our web-based platform and orders are entered into a customized traffic management system which enables us to monitor the status of all orders, generate customer billing and provide detailed transactional reports from our Florida corporate headquarters. We use these reports to monitor customer logistics and transportation usage, track customer and carrier historical data, generate detailed financial and accounting data and provide our customers with details of their supply chain activity. We maintain dual off-site storage and back-up facilities to insure data integrity and security.

Suppliers

We use the services of various third party transportation companies. During 2012, no third party transportation company handled more than 10% of our shipping volume (measured by revenue).

Customers

We strive to establish long-term customer relationships and, by providing a full range of logistics and supply chain services, we seek to increase our level of business with each customer. We service customers ranging from Fortune 100 companies to small businesses in a variety of industries. During 2012, no customer accounted for more than 10% of our revenues. We typically receive credit applications from all customers, review credit references and perform credit checks to ensure credit worthiness.

We have achieved revenue growth through the addition of independent sales agents, the growth of existing agents, the opening of new operations offices, an increase in the number of customers serviced, and the expansion of the logistics and supply chain services we provide.

Each of our operations offices market our full range of supply chain services to existing customers and pursues new customers within its local markets. We build new customer relationships by exploiting our range of logistics and supply chain services, the traffic lanes we commonly service, carrier relationships and capabilities, our industry specific expertise and our sales agents’ individual knowledge and experience.

Our growth model is focused on adding sales agents in strategic markets as well as, through our agent support services, providing capital, training and support for expansion and growth. As our agent network is further established and expanded, we believe that significant other opportunities will emerge. Larger sales agents offices often have their own equipment (truck space), which presents the opportunity to maximize available freight and load capacity thereby increasing gross margins above current levels. In addition, sales representatives will be added to regional operating office sales agent locations to increase market penetration. Since representatives work on a commission basis, this expansion essentially comes with no additional overhead outlay.

Significant opportunities for expansion and growth also include strategic alliances with other service freight broker groups. This strategy will enable us to achieve strong regional penetration into new geographical markets and increase back office capabilities to service the agent network.

7

Competition

The transportation industry is highly competitive and highly fragmented. In our brokerage services, our primary competitors are other non-asset based as well as asset based third party logistics companies, freight brokers, carriers offering logistics services and freight forwarders. In our contract carrier services, our competitors are other contract carriers and common carriers. We also compete with customers’ and shippers’ internal traffic and transportation departments as well as carriers’ internal sales and marketing departments directly seeking shippers’ freight. We generally compete on the basis of price and the range of logistics and supply chain services offered.

Government regulation

Our industry has long been subject to government legislation and regulation. Over the years, many changes in these laws and regulations have affected the industry and caused changes in the operating practices and the cost of providing transportation services. We cannot predict what effect, if any, legislative and regulatory changes may have on the industry in the future.

We are licensed by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, an agency of the United States Department of Transportation (DOT) as a broker arranging the movement of materials by motor carrier. In this capacity, we are required to meet certain qualifications to enable us to conduct business, which includes the compliance with certain surety bond requirements. While this requirement by the DOT is for a $ 10,000 surety bond, we maintain $100,000. We are also licensed by the DOT as a contract carrier arranging the movement of materials by motor carrier. In this capacity, we are required to meet certain qualifications to enable us to conduct business, which includes the maintenance of $750,000 of general liability insurance. Accordingly, we maintain $2,000,000 of general liability insurance and $500,000 of cargo insurance.

If we fail to comply with, or lose, any required licenses, governmental regulators could assess penalties or issue a cease and desist order against our operations that are not in compliance.

Risk and liability

In our brokerage services, we do not take possession of the freight and therefore do not assume legal liability for loss or damage to freight and are not liable for the carrier's negligence or failure to perform. We do assist our customers in the processing and collection of any claim. The Federal Highway Administration requires us to maintain a surety bond of $10,000, which is intended to show our financial responsibility and provide surety for the arrangements with shippers and carriers. We maintain an additional $90,000 surety bond to distinguish ourselves from other brokers. In addition, we maintain $500,000 of contingent cargo liability insurance and $2,000,000 of primary truck brokers liability insurance.

In our contract carrier services, independent owner-operators deliver our transportation services pursuant to our operating licenses and authorities. We are responsible for compliance with federal and state safety regulations concerning our operation as a “for hire” motor carrier service. In addition to public safety, we are primarily liable for property damage, personal injury and loss or damage to our customers’ freight. We maintain $2,000,000 of primary auto liability insurance as well as cargo liability insurance coverage with a policy limit of $500,000 per occurrence. While claims against us relating to such matters have occurred in the ordinary course of business, we have not incurred any material losses to date. Any such losses in excess of insurance limits would be accounted for as incurred for financial reporting purposes.

Employees

As of March 22, 2013 we had 100 full-time employees. None of our employees are represented by a labor union and we believe that our relationship with our employees is good.

8

Available Information

Our website address is www.suntecktransportgroup.com. We are not including the information contained on our website as part of, or incorporating it by reference into, this annual report on Form 10-K. We make available free of charge through our website our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, Forms 3, 4 and 5, and all amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC.

The public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers such as us that file electronically with the SEC. The website address is www.sec.gov.

| Item 1A. | RISK FACTORS

In addition to the other information provided in this report, you should carefully consider the following factors in evaluating our business, operations and financial condition. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us, that we currently deem immaterial or that are similar to those faced by other companies in our industry or business in general, such as competitive conditions, may also impair our business operations.

The occurrence of any of the following risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Risks related to our business

We are dependent upon independent commissioned sales agents who have direct relationships with our customers.

A substantial portion of our business is originated by our network of independent sales agents. Most of these sales agents work with us on an exclusive basis pursuant to contracts with terms ranging from one to five years. However, certain agent contracts are terminable upon thirty days notice by either party. These contracts typically contain non-compete and non-solicitation provisions. Notwithstanding these provisions, we may not be able to restrict the ability of a former agent from competing with us following termination. As a result, if sales representatives terminate their affiliation with us, our revenue and results of operations could be adversely affected.

If we are unable to expand the number of our sales agents, or if a significant number of our existing sales agents leave us, our ability to increase our revenue could be negatively impacted.

Our ability to expand our business will depend, in part, on our ability to attract additional sales agents. Competition for qualified brokerage agents can be intense, and we may be unable to attract such persons. Any difficulties we experience in expanding sales agents could have a negative impact on our ability to expand our customer base, increase our revenue, and continue our growth.

In addition, we must retain our current sales agents and properly incentivize them to obtain new customers and maintain existing customer relationships. If a significant number of our sales agents leave us, our revenue could be negatively impacted. A significant increase in the turnover rate among our current sales agents could also increase our recruiting costs and decrease our operating efficiency.

9

As part of our business, we periodically extend uncollateralized loans and advances to our independent sales agents and have collection risk associated therewith.

As part of our agent support services, we periodically extend loans and/or advances, often uncollateralized, to our independent sales agents to support and encourage the expansion of their businesses. Recovery of these loans and advances depends to a large extent on the borrowers’ ability to generate revenue, which essentially is commissions on sales that they generate. If the agent is not successful in generating sales, or if the agent or we should decide to disaffiliate from each other, our ability to recover these loan amounts may be impaired which could have a material adverse effect on our financial statements

We are dependent on third party capacity providers.

We do not own trucks or other transportation equipment and rely on third party capacity providers, including independent owner-operators, unrelated trucking companies, railroads and air cargo carriers to transport freight for our customers. We compete with motor carriers and other third parties for the services of independent owner-operators and other third party capacity providers. A significant decrease in available capacity provided by either our independent owner-operators or other third party capacity providers could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and revenue.

Our third-party carriers must meet our needs and expectations, and those of our customers, and their inability to do so could adversely affect our results of operations.

Our business depends to a large extent on our ability to provide consistent, high quality, technology-enabled transportation and logistics solutions. We do not own or control the transportation assets that deliver our customers’ freight, and we do not employ the people directly involved in delivering the freight. We rely on third parties to provide less-than-truckload, truckload and, intermodal brokerage and domestic air services and to report certain information to us, including information relating to delivery status and freight claims. This reliance could cause delays in providing our customers with timely delivery of freight and important service data, and in the financial reporting of certain events, including recognizing revenue and recording claims. If we are unable to secure sufficient transportation services to meet our customer’s commitments, or if any of the third parties we rely on do not meet our needs or expectations, or those of our customers, our results of operations could be adversely affected, and our customers could switch to our competitors temporarily or permanently.

If we are unable to maintain the level of service we currently provide to our customers, our reputation may be damaged, resulting in a loss of business.

We compete with other transportation providers based on reliability, delivery time, security, visibility, and personalized service. Our reputation is based on the level of customer service that we currently provide. If this level of service deteriorates, or if we are prevented from delivering on our services in a timely, reliable, safe and secure manner, our reputation and business may suffer.

Our reliance on independent owner-operators to provide transportation services to our customers could limit our expansion.

Our transportation services are conducted in part by independent owner-operators, who are generally responsible for paying for their own equipment, fuel and other operating costs. Our independent owner-operators are responsible for providing the tractors and trailers they use related to our business. Certain factors, such as increases in fuel costs, insurance costs, and the cost of new and used tractors, or reduced financing sources available to independent owner-operators for the purchase of equipment, could create a difficult operating environment for independent owner-operators. Turnover and bankruptcy among independent owner-operators in the over-the-road freight sector, often limits the pool of qualified independent owner-operators and increases the competition among carriers for their services. If we are required to increase the amounts paid to independent owner-operators in order to obtain their services, our results of operations could be adversely affected to the extent increased expenses are not offset by higher freight rates. Additionally, our agreements with our independent owner-operators are terminable by either party upon short notice and without penalty. Consequently, we regularly need to recruit qualified independent owner-operators to replace those who have left our pool. If we are unable to retain our existing independent owner-operators or recruit new independent owner-operators, our results of operations and ability to expand could be adversely affected.

10

A decrease in levels of capacity in the over-the-road freight sector could have an adverse impact on our business.

The current operating environment in the over-the-road freight sector resulting from fluctuating fuel costs and other economic factors is beginning to cause a reduction in capacity in the sector generally, and in our carrier network specifically, which could have an adverse impact on our ability to execute our business strategy and on our business.

Decreased demand for tr ansportation services could adversely affect our operating results.

The transportation industry historically has experienced cyclical financial results as a result of slowdowns in economic activity, the business cycles of customers, price increases by capacity providers, interest rate fluctuations, and other economic factors beyond our control. Certain of our third party capacity providers can be expected to charge higher prices to cover increased operating expenses, and our operating income may decline if we are unable to pass through to our customers the full amount of these higher transportation costs. If a slowdown in economic activity or a downturn in our customers’ business cycles causes a reduction in the volume of freight shipped by those customers, our operating results could be materially adversely affected.

One or more significant claims, our failure to adequately reserve for such claims, or the cost of maintaining our insurance for such claims, could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

In our contract carrier services, independent owner-operators deliver our transportation services pursuant to our operating licenses and authorities. We are responsible for compliance with federal and state safety regulations concerning our operation as a “for hire” motor carrier service. In addition to public safety, we are primarily liable for property damage, personal injury and loss or damage to our customers’ freight. Claims against us may exceed the amount of our insurance coverage, or may not be covered by insurance at all. A material increase in the frequency or severity of accidents, claims for lost or damaged goods, liability claims, or workers compensation claims, or unfavorable resolutions of any such claims, could adversely affect our results of operations to the extent claims are not covered by our insurance or such losses exceed our reserves. Significant increases in insurance costs or the inability to purchase insurance as a result of these claims could also reduce our profitability and have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

In our brokerage services business, we use the services of thousands of transportation companies and their drivers in connection with our transportation operations. From time to time, these drivers are involved in accidents and goods carried by these drivers are lost or damaged, and the carriers may not have adequate insurance coverage. Such accidents usually result in equipment damage and can also result in injuries or death. Although these drivers are not our employees and all of these drivers are independent contractors or work for third-party carriers, from time to time claims may be asserted against us for their actions or for our actions in retaining them. There is no assurance that we will not incur costs in connection with such claims. .

A significant or prolonged economic downturn, particularly the current downturn in the over-the-road freight sector, or a substantial downturn in our customers’ business, could adversely affect our revenue and results of operations.

The over-the-road freight sector has historically experienced cyclical fluctuations in financial results due to, among other things, economic recession, downturns in business cycles, increasing costs and taxes. Fluctuations in energy prices, price increases by carriers, changes in regulatory standards, license and registration fees, interest rate fluctuations and other economic factors beyond our control. All of these factors could increase the operating costs of a vehicle and impact capacity levels in the over-the-road freight sector. Carriers may charge higher prices to cover higher operating expenses, and our operating income may decrease if we are unable to pass through to our customers the full amount of higher purchased transportation costs. Additionally, economic conditions may adversely affect our customers, their need for our services, or their ability to pay for our services.

11

The cost of compliance with, liability for violations of, or modifications to existing or future governmental regulations could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Our operations are subject to certain federal, state and local regulatory requirements. These regulations and requirements are subject to change based on new legislation and regulatory initiatives, which could affect the economics of the transportation industry by requiring changes in operating practices or influencing the demand for, and the cost of providing, transportation services. The DOT, and its agencies, such as the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, and various state and local agencies exercise broad powers over our business, generally governing such activities as engaging in motor carrier operations, freight forwarding, and freight brokerage operations, as well as regulating safely. As a motor carrier authorized by the DOT, we must comply with the safety and fitness regulations promulgated by the DOT, including those relating to drug and alcohol testing, driver qualification and hours-of service. There also are regulations specifically relating to the trucking industry, including testing and specifications of equipment, product handling requirements and hazardous material requirements. In addition, we must comply with certain safety, insurance, and bonding requirements promulgated by the DOT and various state agencies. Compliance with existing, new, or more stringent measures could disrupt or impede the timing of our deliveries and our ability to satisfy the needs of our customers. In addition, we may experience an increase in operating costs, such as security costs, as a result of governmental regulations that have been and will be adopted in response to terrorist activities and potential terrorist activities. The cost of compliance with existing or future measures could adversely affect our results of operations. Further, we could become subject to liabilities as a result of a failure to comply with applicable regulations.

If our independent contractors are deemed by regulators to be employees, our business and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Tax and other regulatory authorities have in the past sought to assert that independent contractors in the trucking industry are employees rather than independent contractors. There can be no assurance that these authorities will not successfully assert this position or that tax laws and other laws that currently consider these persons independent contractors will not change. If our independent contractors are determined to be our employees, we would incur additional exposure under federal and state law, workers compensation, unemployment benefits, labor, employment, and tort laws, including for prior periods, as well as potential liability for employee benefits and tax withholdings. Our business model relies on the fact that our independent contractors are independent contractors and not deemed to be our employees, and exposure to any of the above factors could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

We have limited marketing and sales capabilities and must make sales in fragmented markets.

Our future success depends, to a great extent, on our ability to successfully market our services through our network of independent agents. Our sales and marketing capabilities are more limited than many of our competitors who have captive internal sales forces and greater financial resources than us. We cannot assure you that any marketing and sales efforts undertaken on our behalf will be successful or will result in any significant sales.

Our industry is intensely competitive, which may adversely affect our operations and financial results.

All our markets are intensely competitive and numerous companies offer services that compete with our services. We anticipate that competition for our services will continue to increase. Many of our competitors have substantially greater capital resources, sales and marketing resources and experience. We cannot assure you that we will be able to effectively compete with our competitors in effecting our business expansion plans.

12

We depend on the continued services of our CEO, president and chief financial officer.

Our future success depends, in part, on the continuing efforts of our CEO, Harry Wachtel, who conceived our strategic plan and is responsible for executing that plan, our president, Michael Williams, and our chief financial officer, William Wunderlich. We do not have “key man” insurance on any of them. If we lose any of their services, our business, operations and financial condition would be materially adversely affected.

We must attract and retain qualified personnel.

As we implement our business growth strategy, significant demands will be placed on our managerial, financial and other resources. One of the keys to our future success will be our ability to attract and retain highly qualified marketing, sales and administrative personnel. Competition for qualified personnel in these areas is intense and we will be competing for their services with companies that have substantially greater resources than we do. We cannot assure you that we will be able to identify, attract and retain personnel with skills and experience necessary and relevant to the future operations of our business. Our inability to retain or attract qualified personnel in these areas could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

We may require additional financing in the future, which may not be available on acceptable terms.

Depending on our ability to generate revenues, we may require additional funds to expand our business operations, broaden the markets that we serve and for working capital and general corporate purposes. Any additional equity financing may be dilutive to stockholders, and debt financings may involve restrictive covenants that limit our ability to make decisions that we believe will be in our best interests. In the event we cannot obtain additional financing on terms acceptable to us when required, our ability to expand operations may be materially adversely affected.

Risks related to the proposed Merger

The Merger Agreement we entered into on February 28, 2013 is subject to closing conditions and other uncertainties, many of which are outside of our control. Failure of the Merger to close may have material adverse effect upon our financial results and business operations.

13

On February 28, 2013, we entered into the Merger Agreement relating to the sale of AutoInfo to an affiliate of Comvest Partners, a private equity firm. The respective obligations of the parties to the Merger Agreement to consummate the Merger are subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain customary conditions, including: (i) the adoption of the Merger Agreement by our stockholders; (ii) there not being any temporary restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunction or other judgment or order issued by any governmental authority or other law, rule, legal restraint or prohibition in effect preventing, restraining or rendering illegal the consummation of the Merger; (iii) the accuracy of the representations and warranties of the parties; (iv) compliance by the parties with their respective obligations under the Merger Agreement; (v) the receipt of required consents; (vi) there not having occurred a material adverse effect with respect to AutoInfo; (vii) the receipt of written resignation letters from each of the members of the Board; and (viii) stockholders holding no more than 5% of the shares of AutoInfo’s common stock having exercised appraisal rights under Delaware law. Failure to meet these conditions, among others, could give rise to termination rights under the Merger Agreement. In certain termination events we will be required to pay a termination fee of $1.5 million and reimburse expenses of up to $1.25 million, in addition to the payment of fees and expenses we will have incurred with respect to the proposed Merger.

Further, there are incremental risks and uncertainties related to the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereunder that may affect us, many of which are outside of our control, including the following:

| • | the occurrence of any event, change or other circumstance that could give rise to the termination of the Merger Agreement;

| • | the inability to complete the Merger due to the failure to obtain stockholder approval or the failure to satisfy other conditions required for the consummation of the Merger;

| • | failure or delay in consummation of the Merger for other reasons;

| • | that the proposed transaction disrupts current plans and operations;

| • | potential difficulties in employee and agent retention as a result of the Merger;

| • | the effect of the announcement of the Merger on our customer relationships, operating results and business generally;

| • | the diversion of our management’s attention from our ongoing business concerns;

| • | the outcome of any legal proceedings that may be instituted against us and/or others relating to the Merger Agreement;

| • | limitations placed on our ability to operate the business by the Merger Agreement; and

| • | the amounts of the costs, fees, expenses and charges related to the Merger.

There is no assurance that the Merger will be consummated and the failure of the Merger to close may have a material adverse effect on our business operations and financial results.

14

Risks related to our common stock

Our principal stockholders have substantial control over our affairs.

As of March 22, 2013, our chief executive officer, Harry Wachtel, beneficially owned approximately 18.5% of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock. Further, James T. Martin and Kinderhook, LP owned approximately 16.4% and 18.3%, respectively, of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock. As a result, any one or a combination of Mr. Wachtel, Mr. Martin or Kinderhook, LP could assert control over our affairs, including the election of directors and any proposals regarding a sale of the company or its assets or a merger. In addition, this concentration of ownership could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control or impeding a merger or consolidation, takeover or other business combination which you, as a stockholder, may otherwise view favorably.

Our stock price is volatile and could be further affected by events not within our control.

The market price of our common stock has historically experienced and may continue to experience significant volatility. For the 52-week period ended March 22, 2013, our closing stock price has ranged from $1.13 to $0.69. On March 22, 2013, our closing stock price was $1.13.

The trading price of our common stock has been volatile and will continue to be subject to:

| · | volatility in the trading markets generally;

| · | fluctuations in our quarterly operating results; and

| · | announcements regarding our business or the business of our competitors.

Statements or changes in opinions, ratings or earnings estimates made by brokerage firms or industry analysts relating to the markets in which we operate or expect to operate could also have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock. In addition, the stock market as a whole is currently experiencing extreme price and volume fluctuations which have particularly affected the market price for the securities of many small-cap companies and which often have been unrelated to the operating performance of these companies.

The price of our common stock may be adversely affected by the possible issuance of shares of our common stock as a result of the exercise of outstanding options.

We have granted options covering approximately 7.1 million shares of our common stock. As a result of the actual or potential sale of these shares into the market, our common stock price may decrease.

Future sales of our common stock may adversely affect our common stock price.

If our stockholders sell a large number of shares of common stock or if we issue a large number of shares in connection with future acquisitions or financings, the market price of our common stock could decline significantly. In addition, the perception in the public market that our stockholders might sell a large number of shares of common stock could cause a decline in the market price of our common stock.

Some provisions in our charter documents and bylaws may have anti-takeover effects.

Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that may make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, with the result that it may deter potential suitors. For example, our board of directors is authorized, without action of the stockholders, to issue authorized but unissued common and preferred stock. The existence of authorized but unissued common and preferred stock enables us to discourage or to make it more difficult to obtain control of us by means of a merger, tender offer, proxy contest or otherwise.

15

We have agreed to limitations on the potential liability of our directors.

Our certificate of incorporation provides that, in general, directors will not be personally liable for monetary damages to the company or our stockholders for a breach of fiduciary duty. Although this limitation of liability does not affect the availability of equitable remedies such as injunctive relief or rescission, the presence of these provisions in the certificate of incorporation could prevent us from recovering monetary damages.

Liquidity on the Nasdaq OTC Bulletin Board (“OTCBB”) is limited, and we may be unable to obtain listing of our common stock on a more liquid market.

Our common stock is quoted on the OTCBB, which provides significantly less liquidity than a national securities exchange such as the New York Stock Exchange and the Nasdaq Global or Capital Markets. We do not currently meet the minimum trading price requirement for listing on any of these exchanges and there is uncertainty that we will ever be accepted for a listing on any of these exchanges.

Our common stock has been thinly traded, and the public market may provide little or no liquidity for holders of our common stock.

Purchasers of shares of our common stock may find it difficult to resell their shares at prices quoted in the market or at all. There is currently a limited volume of trading in our common stock, and on many days there has been no trading activity at all. Due to the historically low trading price of our common stock, many brokerage firms may be unwilling to effect transactions in our common stock, particularly because low-priced securities are subject to an SEC rule that imposes additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell low-priced securities (generally those below $5.00 per share). We cannot predict when or whether investor interest in our common stock might lead to an increase in its market price or the development of a more active trading market or how liquid that market might become.

| Item 1B. | UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

Item 2. PROPERTIES

We lease approximately 5,300 square feet of space for our executive offices and the headquarters of Sunteck at 6413 Congress Avenue, Boca Raton, Florida. This lease term runs through August 2016 and provides for aggregate annual rent payments of $63,000, $65,000, $67,000 and $46,000 for the years ending December 31, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively. We lease approximately 2,100 square feet of space for our freight brokerage and distribution and logistics group at 6413 Congress Avenue, Boca Raton, Florida. This lease term runs through August 2016 and provides for annual aggregate rent payments of $27,000, $28,000, $28,000 and $24,000 for the years ending December 31, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively. We lease approximately 3,800 square feet at 13107 Atlantic Blvd., Jacksonville, Florida for our legal and compliance group. This lease runs through June 2016 and provides for annual aggregate rent payments of $31,000, $52,000, $65,000 and $39,000 for the years ending December 31, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively. We lease facilities in Jacksonville, Florida pursuant to two separate leases for our truck agent administrative offices and truck yard consisting of 3.5 acres and 6 modular office units. These leases run through December 2014 and provide for aggregate annual rent payments of $86,000 for the years ending December 31, 2013 and 2014, respectively. We lease approximately 1,250 square feet at 4411 E. Sunshine Suite B, Springfield, Missouri. This lease is for the one year period from January through December 2013, at an annual rental rate of $12,500.

16

Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are not a party to any material legal proceedings.

Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5. MARKET FOR OUR COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Our common stock is not listed on any stock exchange. Our common stock is quoted on the OTCBB under the symbol “Auto.” The following table sets forth the high and low bid information for our common stock for each quarter within the last two fiscal years, as reported by the OTCBB. The bid information reflects inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission, and may not represent actual transactions.

|  | Bid Prices |
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |  | High |  |  | Low |
First quarter |  | $ | 0.80 |  |  | $ | 0.69 |
Second quarter |  |  | 0.85 |  |  |  | 0.69 |
Third quarter |  |  | 0.87 |  |  |  | 0.74 |
Fourth quarter |  |  | 0.98 |  |  |  | 0.77 |
Year Ended December 31, 2011 |  | High |  |  | Low |
First quarter |  | $ | 0.77 |  |  | $ | 0.60 |
Second quarter |  |  | 0.80 |  |  |  | 0.55 |
Third quarter |  |  | 0.64 |  |  |  | 0.49 |
Fourth quarter |  |  | 0.87 |  |  |  | 0.51 |

As of March 22, 2013, the closing price per share for our common stock, as reported on the OTCBB, was $1.13. As of March 22, 2013, we had approximately 500 beneficial stockholders.

Dividend policy

We have never declared or paid a cash dividend on our common stock. It has been the policy of our Board to retain all available funds to finance the development and growth of our business. The payment of cash dividends in the future will be dependent upon our earnings and financial requirements and other factors deemed relevant by our Board.

Item 6. SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

The following is a summary of our selected consolidated financial data for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, 2010, 2009 and 2008. The financial data has been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes.

The selected financial data set forth below should be read together with, and are qualified by reference to, the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial condition and Results of Operations” section of this report and our audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included elsewhere in this report.

17

000’s omitted, except for per share data |  | Year ended December 31, |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |  |  | 2009 |  |  | 2008 |
Statement of Operations Data: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Gross revenues |  | $ | 278,171 |  |  | $ | 319,970 |  |  | $ | 279,701 |  |  | $ | 183,899 |  |  | $ | 180,211 |
Income from operations |  |  | 7,418 |  |  |  | 6,432 |  |  |  | 5,676 |  |  |  | 2,828 |  |  |  | 4,195 |
Net income |  | $ | 4,356 |  |  | $ | 3,638 |  |  | $ | 3,055 |  |  | $ | 1,418 |  |  | $ | 2,224 |
Net income per share (1) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Basic |  | $ | .13 |  |  | $ | .11 |  |  | $ | .09 |  |  | $ | .04 |  |  | $ | .07 |
Diluted |  | $ | .12 |  |  | $ | .10 |  |  | $ | .09 |  |  | $ | .04 |  |  | $ | .07 |

| (1) | The common stock equivalents for the year ended December 31, 2012, 2011, 2010, 2009 and 2008 were 1,878,000, 1,488,000, 990,000, 1,266,000 and 1,727,000, respectively.

000’s omitted |  | As at December 31, |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |  |  | 2009 |  |  | 2008 |
Balance Sheet Data: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash and cash equivalents |  | $ | 40 |  |  | $ | 136 |  |  | $ | 316 |  |  | $ | 67 |  |  | $ | 390 |
Accounts receivable, net |  |  | 42,361 |  |  |  | 40,658 |  |  |  | 49,736 |  |  |  | 36,068 |  |  |  | 29,863 |
Total assets |  |  | 64,404 |  |  |  | 59,107 |  |  |  | 66,727 |  |  |  | 54,205 |  |  |  | 42,776 |
Total liabilities |  |  | 35,059 |  |  |  | 34,215 |  |  |  | 45,620 |  |  |  | 36,281 |  |  |  | 26,467 |
Retained earnings (deficit) |  |  | 8,839 |  |  |  | 4,483 |  |  |  | 845 |  |  |  | (2,210 | ) |  |  | (3,628 | )
Stockholders’ equity |  |  | 29,345 |  |  |  | 24,892 |  |  |  | 21,107 |  |  |  | 17,924 |  |  |  | 16,309 |

Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Cautionary statement identifying important factors that could cause our actual results to differ from those projected in forward looking statements.

Readers of this report are advised that this document contains both statements of historical facts and forward looking statements. Forward looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward looking statements. Examples of forward looking statements include, but are not limited to (i) projections of revenues, income or loss, earnings per share, capital expenditures, dividends, capital structure and other financial items, (ii) statements of our plans and objectives with respect to business transactions and enhancement of stockholder value, (iii) statements of future economic performance, and (iv) statements of assumptions underlying other statements and statements about our business prospects.

This report also identifies important factors, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include the factors discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” beginning at page 9 of this report.

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report.

18

Overview

Through our wholly-owned subsidiaries, Sunteck Transport Group, Inc. (“Sunteck”), E-Transport Group, Inc. and Equipment Finance Solution, Inc., we are a non-asset based transportation services company, providing transportation capacity and related transportation services to shippers throughout the United States and Canada. As a non-asset based provider of brokerage and contract carrier transportation services, we do not own any equipment and our services are provided through our strategic alliances with less than truckload, truckload, air, rail, ocean common carriers and independent owner-operators to service our customers’ needs. Our services include ground transportation coast to coast, local pick up and delivery, air freight and ocean freight. Our business services emphasize safety, information coordination and customer service and are delivered through a network of independent commissioned sales agents and third party capacity providers coordinated by us. The independent commissioned sales agents typically enter into exclusive contractual arrangements with Sunteck and are responsible for locating freight and coordinating the transportation of the freight with customers and capacity providers. The third party capacity providers consist of independent contractors who provide truck capacity to us, including owner-operators who operate under our contract carrier license, air cargo carriers and railroads.

We operate in two business segments, non-asset based transportation services and agent support services. The non-asset based transportation services segment includes our brokerage and contract carrier services which are provided through a network of independent sales agents throughout the United States and Canada. Revenue in this segment is generated from freight transportation transactions. The agent support services segment includes an array of services that we provide to our agent network to support and encourage the expansion of our agents’ businesses, primarily financial support through interest bearing long-term loans, sales-type leases (which facilitate the acquisition of trucks by owner-operators), non-interest bearing short-term loans, as well as other services including training, margin analysis, marketing assistance, industry and market segment data, and business analysis tools. Revenue in this segment consists primarily of interest earned on interest bearing loans and profits and interest earned on sales-type leases.

Gross revenues during our most recently completed fiscal year were approximately $276.2 million and $2.0 million from transportation services and agent support services, respectively. Income from operations was approximately $6.9 million and $0.5 million from transportation services and agent support services, respectively.

Recent Developments – Entry into Merger Agreement for the Potential Sale of AutoInfo

On February 28, 2013, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), by and among AutoInfo, AutoInfo Holdings, LLC., a Delaware limited liability company (“Parent”), and AutoInfo Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (“Merger Sub”), pursuant to which Merger Sub shall be merged with and into AutoInfo, and the separate corporate existence of Merger Sub shall thereupon cease, and AutoInfo shall continue as the surviving corporation (the “Surviving Corporation”) and a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (the “Merger”). The Merger Agreement was unanimously approved by our Board of Directors (the “Board”), based on the recommendation of a Special Committee of the Board (the “Special Committee”) that was formed to evaluate and negotiate the terms of a sale of AutoInfo.

At the time the Merger becomes effective pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement and under Delaware law (the “Effective Time”): (a) each share of capital stock of Merger Sub issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be converted into and become one validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable share of common stock of the Surviving Corporation, (b) each share of common stock of AutoInfo issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (other than shares owned by AutoInfo, Parent or Merger Sub, and shares owned by stockholders of AutoInfo who have perfected and not withdrawn a demand for appraisal rights under Delaware law) will automatically be cancelled and converted into the right to receive $1.05 in cash, without interest (the “Merger Consideration”); and (c) each option outstanding (whether or not then vested or exercisable) that represents the right to acquire shares of common stock of AutoInfo will be cancelled and terminated whereby the holder of any such options to acquire common stock of AutoInfo shall receive an amount for each such option equal to the excess, if any, of (i) the Merger Consideration over (ii) the exercise price payable in respect of such share of common stock of AutoInfo issuable upon exercise of such options.

19

The Merger Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and covenants. The consummation of the Merger is subject to customary conditions, including, without limitation, (a) approval by the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock of AutoInfo entitled to vote on the Merger and (b) the absence of any law, order, injunction or other legal restraint prohibiting the Merger. Moreover, each party’s obligation to consummate the Merger is subject to certain other conditions, including, without limitation, (i) the accuracy of the other party’s representations and warranties (subject to customary qualifiers), (ii) the other party’s compliance with its covenants and agreements contained in the Merger Agreement (subject to customary qualifiers), (iii) certain required consents having been obtained, (iv) there not being any Company Material Adverse Effect (as defined in the Merger Agreement), and (v) there not being holders of more than 5% of the shares of common stock of AutoInfo with respect to which appraisal rights have been properly exercised.

From the date of the Merger Agreement, we are subject to customary “no-shop” restrictions on our ability to solicit or respond to alternative takeover proposals from third parties, furnish information to and engage in discussions with third parties regarding alternative takeover proposals, recommend an alternative takeover proposal or enter into an agreement with respect to an alternative takeover proposal. The “no-shop” provision, however, is subject to a customary “fiduciary-out” provision, which provides that, at any point prior to the time stockholder approval is obtained, the Board may change its recommendation to AutoInfo’s stockholders or enter into a definitive agreement with respect to an unsolicited, bona fide takeover proposal, if and only if, prior to taking such action, the Board has determined in good faith, after consultation with independent financial advisors and outside legal counsel, (a) that failure to take such action would violate the directors’ fiduciary duties to AutoInfo’s stockholders under Delaware law and (b) that the Takeover Proposal (as defined in the Merger Agreement) constitutes a Superior Proposal(as defined in the Merger Agreement); provided, however, that (a) AutoInfo has given Parent at least five (5) business days’ prior written notice of its intention to take such action and has provided a copy of the relevant proposed transaction agreements disclosing the party making such Takeover Proposal, (b) AutoInfo has negotiated in good faith with Parent during such five (5) business day notice period (to the extent Parent wishes to negotiate) to enable Parent to revise the terms of the Merger Agreement such as to cause such Takeover Proposal to no longer constitute a Superior Proposal, (c) following the end of such five (5) business day notice period, the Board will have considered in good faith any changes to the Merger Agreement proposed in writing by Parent and will have determined that the Superior Proposal would continue to constitute a Superior Proposal if such revised terms offered by Parent were given effect, and (d) in the event of any changes to the terms of such Superior Proposal, AutoInfo shall have delivered to Parent an additional notice and a new five (5) business day notice period.

The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights for AutoInfo and Parent, including the right of AutoInfo under certain circumstances to terminate the Merger Agreement to accept a Superior Proposal and enter into a definitive agreement with respect thereto. Upon termination of the Merger Agreement under specified circumstances, including termination of the Merger Agreement to accept a Superior Proposal and enter into a definitive agreement with respect thereto, AutoInfo is required to pay Parent a termination fee of $1.5 million and reimburse Parent for out-of-pocket expenses actually incurred not to exceed $1.25 million. Upon termination of the Merger Agreement by AutoInfo under certain specified circumstances, Parent and Merger Sub are required to pay AutoInfo, a termination fee of $1.5 million.

The representations, warranties and covenants made in the Merger Agreement (a) have been made only for purposes of the Merger Agreement, (b) have been qualified by confidential disclosures made to Parent and Merger Sub in connection with the Merger Agreement, (c) are subject to materiality qualifications contained in the Merger Agreement which may differ from what may be viewed as material by investors, (d) were made only as of the date of the Merger Agreement or such other date as is specified in the Merger Agreement and (e) have been included in the Merger Agreement for the purpose of allocating risk between the contracting parties rather than establishing matters as facts. Accordingly, the Merger Agreement is included with this filing only to provide investors with information regarding the terms of the Merger Agreement, and not to provide investors with any other factual information regarding AutoInfo or its business. Investors should not rely on the representations, warranties and covenants or any descriptions thereof as characterizations of the actual state of facts or condition of AutoInfo or any of its Subsidiaries (as defined in the Merger Agreement) or Affiliates (as defined in the Merger Agreement). Moreover, information concerning the subject matter of the representations and warranties may change after the date of the Merger Agreement, which subsequent information may or may not be fully reflected in AutoInfo’s public disclosures.

20

The Board, acting upon the recommendation of the Special Committee, has approved the adoption of the Merger Agreement and consummation of the Merger and recommended adoption of the Merger Agreement and consummation of the Merger by our stockholders. The transactions contemplated under the Merger Agreement are expected to close in the second quarter of 2013.

As a condition to Parent entering into the Merger Agreement, on February 28, 2013, Peter C. Einselen, Mark K. Patterson, Thomas C. Robertson, Harry Wachtel, Mark Weiss, Michael P. Williams and William I. Wunderlich, in each case a stockholder and/or an option holder of AutoInfo and members of our management and/or members of the Board, entered into a voting agreement with Parent (the “Voting Agreement”), whereby each voting stockholder party to the Voting Agreement agreed to vote all of the shares of common stock or options of AutoInfo beneficially owned (or of record) by such voting stockholder, including, but not limited to, any shares of common stock or options of AutoInfo that such voting stockholder has the right to vote due to any agreement, proxy or other similar right (i) in favor of adoption of the Merger Agreement and in favor of the Merger, (ii) against (A) any proposal made in opposition to adoption of the Merger Agreement or in competition or inconsistent with the Merger or any other Transaction (as defined in the Merger Agreement), (B) any Takeover Proposal, (C) any change in AutoInfo’s management or the Board (other than as contemplated by the Merger Agreement), and (D) any action or agreement that the voting stockholders party to the Voting Agreement actually knows, or reasonably expects, would result in a breach of any representation, warranty, covenant or agreement or any other obligation of AutoInfo under the Merger Agreement or of such voting stockholder party to the Voting Agreement. The voting stockholders parties to the Voting Agreement own approximately 22.3% of the voting power of shares entitled to vote on the Merger.

Results of operations

Comparison of 2012 vs 2011

During the year ended December 31, 2012, we continued to implement our strategic growth plan consisting primarily of the expansion of client services and the addition of independent sales agents providing brokerage and contract carrier services.

From January 1, 2011 through June 30, 2011, our contractual arrangement with one of our significant independent agents (the “Significant Agent”) provided for the Significant Agent’s retention of all of the net revenues earned on the transactions it generated. The Significant Agent paid us interest on loans and advances we extended to it at rates ranging from 8% to 20% plus a fee equal to 25% of the Significant Agent’s pre-tax income, if any, as defined in the applicable agreement. In addition, the Significant Agent granted to us an option to convert a portion of outstanding loans into a 25% equity ownership interest in the Significant Agent’s business.

On July 8, 2011, pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Acquisition Agreement”) we acquired substantially all of the operations of the Significant Agent’s truck agent business (the “July 2011 Tranasaction”). This principally consisted of the future revenue stream generated by independent agents, customers and owner-operators already under contract with and operating under our authorities and licenses, which were managed by the Significant Agent and for which the Significant Agent received 100% of the net revenue earned. The purchase price totaled approximately $10 million and principally consisted of an unconditional release and discharge of the Significant Agent from approximately $9.4 million of indebtedness due to us plus the assumption of certain liabilities. Goodwill recognized in this transaction amounted to $9.8 million and other intangible assets amounted to $0.2 million. Pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement, all previous contractual arrangements between us and the Significant Agent were terminated, including the option to convert a portion of outstanding loans into a 25% equity ownership interest in the Significant Agent’s business. However, we agreed to continue to provide the Significant Agent with certain support services for its retained businesses through December 31, 2011, and entered into a brokerage agent agreement with the Significant Agent. In November 2011, the Significant Agent terminated its brokerage agreement with us and entered into a new credit facility. In connection with the termination of the brokerage agent agreement, the Significant Agent purchased approximately $11 million of our accounts receivable and assumed approximately $6 million of our related liabilities. The net proceeds of approximately $5 million were used by us to reduce the outstanding borrowings under our credit facility with Regions Bank. The impact of this acquisition on our 2011 financial statements and operating results was, for the period July through December, to reduce interest income earned on the discharge of indebtedness by approximately $827,000, decrease commission expense by approximately $1,453,000 and increase direct operating expenses associated with the operation of the acquired truck agent business by approximately $609,000.

21

The Significant Agent generated approximately 28% of our gross transportation services revenues for the year ended December 31, 2011.

During the next twelve months, we plan to continue to offer our brokerage and contract carrier transportation services and expand our agent network. We are presently profitable and have adequate available lines of credit to satisfy our working capital requirements during the next twelve months.

Revenues

We operate in two business segments, non-asset based transportation services and agent support services.

The following analysis is based upon the pro-forma results for the year ended December 31, 2011, the details of which are provided in Notes 4 and 11 to our consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this Report.

Non-asset based transportation services

In our transportation services segment, gross revenues consisting of freight fees and other related services revenue, totaled $276,198,000 for the year ended December 31, 2012, as compared with pro-forma gross revenues of $253,038,000 in the same prior year period, an increase of approximately 9%. The increase in gross revenues is primarily the result of growth of our agent network.

Our net revenue (gross transportation services revenues less the direct cost of purchased transportation) is the primary indicator of our ability to source, add value and resell services that are provided by third parties and are considered to be the primary measurement of growth. Therefore, the discussion of the results of operations for this segment focuses on the changes in our net revenue. The increases in the amount of net revenue and all related cost and expense categories are the direct result of our business expansion.

The following table represents certain statement of income data for our transportation services segment as a percentage of net revenue.

|  | Year Ended December 31, |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Net revenue |  |  | 100.0 | % |  |  | 100.0 | %
Commissions |  |  | 62.7 | % |  |  | 63.2 | %
Operating expenses |  |  | 24.6 | % |  |  | 24.0 | %
Interest expense |  |  | .6 | % |  |  | 1.1 | %
Income taxes |  |  | 4.7 | % |  |  | 4.5 | %
Net income |  |  | 7.4 | % |  |  | 7.2 | %

22

Agent support services

In our agent support services segment, gross revenues, consisting primarily of revenues recognized from sales-type leases and interest income earned on loans, totaled $1,973,000 for the year ended December 31, 2012, as compared with pro-forma gross revenues of $904,000 in the same prior year period, an increase of approximately 118%. The increase in gross revenues is primarily the result of revenues recognized from sales-type leases of approximately $1,705,000 against which we incurred the direct cost of purchased equipment of $1,178,000 for the year ended December 31, 2012 as compared with revenues of $696,000 against which we incurred the direct cost of purchased equipment of $566,000 in the prior year.

Costs and expenses

Purchased transportation

Purchased transportation totaled $221,366,000 for the for the year ended December 31, 2012, as compared with pro-forma purchased transportation of $203,042,000 in the prior year, an increase of 9%. This is the direct result of the increase in gross revenues from transportation services of 9% during the period.

Purchased equipment for resale

During the fourth quarter of 2011, through our newly acquired truck agent business, we introduced a sales-type lease program for our owner-operators to facilitate the acquisition of trucks. This resulted in revenues of $1,705,000 against which we incurred the direct cost of purchased equipment of $1,178,000 for the year ended December 31, 2012, as compared with revenues of $696,000 against which we incurred the direct cost of purchased equipment of $566,000 in the prior year.

Commissions

Commissions totaled $34,379,000 for the year ended December 31, 2012, as compared with pro-forma commissions of $31,601,000 in the prior year, an increase of 9%. This increase is the result of the increase in gross transportation services revenues of 9%. As a percentage of net revenue from transportation services, commissions were 62.7% for the year ended December 31, 2012, as compared with 63.2% in the prior year.

Operating expenses

Operating expenses totaled $13,830,000 for the year ended December 31, 2012, as compared with pro-forma operating expenses of $12,274,000 in the prior year, an increase of 13%. This increase is the direct result of the increase in selling, general and administrative expenses in connection with our business expansion and expenses incurred in contemplation of the Merger. As a percentage of net revenues from transportation services, operating expenses from transportation services were 24.6% for the year ended December 31, 2012, as compared with 24.0% in the prior year. Operating expenses from agent support services, consisting primarily of salaries and related employee benefits, were $316,000 for the year ended December 31, 2012, as compared with $271,000 in the prior year.

We presently have adequate facilities and management to handle our present and anticipated transaction volume in our brokerage transportation services segment in without incurring a significant increase in overhead.

Interest expense was $323,000 for the year ended December 31, 2012, as compared with $520,000 in the prior year. This decrease is primarily due to decreased borrowings as well as a reduction in interest rate based on the loan modification agreement we entered into with Regions Bank in April 2011 which was further reduced to LIBOR plus 1.75% in March 2012.

23

Income tax

Income tax expense was $2,739,000 for the year ended December 31, 2012, as compared with $2,284,000 in the prior year. The 2012 income tax expense reflects an effective federal and state tax rate of 38.6% and is comprised of a deferred tax expense of $608,000 related primarily to temporary differences and a current tax expense of $2,131,000. The 2011 income tax expense reflects an effective federal and state tax rate of 38.5% and is comprised of a deferred tax expense of $93,000 related primarily to temporary differences and a current tax expense of $2,181,000.

Trends and uncertainties

The transportation industry is highly competitive and highly fragmented. In our brokerage services, our primary competitors are other non-asset based as well as asset based third party logistics companies, freight brokers, carriers offering logistics services and freight forwarders. In our contract carrier services, our competitors are other contract carriers and common carriers. We also compete with customers’ and shippers’ internal traffic and transportation departments as well as carriers’ internal sales and marketing departments directly seeking shippers’ freight. We anticipate that competition for our services will continue to increase. Many of our competitors have substantially greater capital resources, sales and marketing resources and experience. We cannot assure you that we will be able to effectively compete with our competitors in effecting our business expansion plans. The most significant trend contributing to our growth during the past two years has been the expansion of our brokerage services agent network and contract carrier agent and owner-operator network. Sales agents are independent contractors and, as such, there are no assurances that we can either maintain our existing agent network or continue to expand this network.

For the year ended December 31, 2012, we increased gross revenues from approximately $253.9 million on a pro-forma basis to $278.2 million. As of December 31, 2012, we had retained earnings of approximately $8.8 million as compared with $4.5 million at December 31, 2011. Factors that could adversely affect our operating results include:

| · | the success of Sunteck and E-Transport Group in expanding their business operations;

| · | margin pressure as a result of increased competition; and

| · | changes in general economic conditions.

Depending on our ability to generate revenues, we may require additional funds to expand our business operations and for working capital and general corporate purposes. Any additional equity financing may be dilutive to stockholders, and debt financings may involve restrictive covenants that further limit our ability to make decisions that we believe will be in our best interests. In the event we cannot obtain additional financing on terms acceptable to us when required, our ability to expand our operations may be materially adversely affected.

Advances and other assets

An integral component of our growth strategy is, and has been, the expansion of our independent sales agent network. During the past three years, we have expanded this strategy to include independent sales agents with the experience and opportunity to build the infrastructure required to generate opportunities for significant increases in revenues. As our year-over-year results reflect, this initiative has been successful. In identifying these opportunities, we analyze a prospective sales agent’s customer relationships, financial stability, industry experience and past performance. Based upon the results of such analysis we determine our level of interest in affiliating with the target sales agent and evaluate such sales agent’s capital needs to support its integration into our business and to maximize the agent’s potential revenue growth, and thus revenue contribution.

24

Our agent expansion and recruiting program includes several components which are tailored to the specific needs of individual agent groups. Each of these situations has differing characteristics and are addressed and evaluated on a case-by-case basis. The options we consider to support a new sales agent’s business expansion include signing bonuses, short-term advances, non-interest bearing loans, long-term advances and interest bearing loans.

Loans have been utilized in a limited number of sales agent acquisitions to support transitional operating expenses such as facilities, equipment, and personnel, which typically includes both sales and operations staff. These loans are viewed by us as providing stability during transition and an enhanced opportunity for growth.

The consideration in connection with the July 2011 Transaction included the discharge of approximately $9.4 million of loans due to us which resulted in a significant reduction in advances and other assets as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Liquidity and capital resources

During the past two years, our sources for cash have been cash flow generated from operations and available borrowings under our lines of credit.

In February 2009, we entered into a $30 million line of credit with Regions Bank, secured by substantially all of our assets, which was increased to $35 million in 2011. In April 2011, we modified our credit facility with Regions Bank to (a) increase our line of credit from $30 million to $35 million, (b) extend the maturity date from March 2012 to June 2014, and (c) change the interest rate from LIBOR plus 2.5% with a floor ranging from 3.0 – 3.5% to LIBOR plus 1.75% - 2.25%, with no floor, subject to the maintenance of the following financial covenants: 1) fixed charge coverage ratio not less than 1.30:1; 2) funded debt to EBITDA ratio of not more than 7.50:1 for 2010, 6.00:1 for 2011, 5.00:1 for 2012 , and 4.00:1 for 2013 and thereafter; and 3) working capital ratio of not less than 1.00:1. Based upon the funded debt to EBITDA ratio, the interest rate was reduced to LIBOR plus 1.75% in March 2012. As of December 31, 2012 we were in compliance, and not at risk of breach, with respect to each of these covenants.

At December 31, 2012, we had liquid assets of approximately $40,000.

The total amount of debt outstanding at December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $13,025,000 and $16,273,000, respectively. The following table presents our debt instruments and their weighted average interest rates at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively:

|  | Balance |  |  | Weighted Average Rate |  |  | Balance |  |  | Weighted Average Rate |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Line of Credit |  | $ | 13,025,000 |  |  |  | 1.96 | % |  | $ | 16,273,000 |  |  |  | 2.30 | %

Inflation and changing prices had no material impact on our revenues or the results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2012.

25

Critical accounting policies

Preparation of our financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Note 1 of the Notes to Financial Statements includes a summary of the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our financial statements. The most significant areas involving our estimates and assumptions are described below. Actual results could differ materially from our estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Revenue recognition

Gross revenues from transportation services consist of the total dollar value of services purchased by shippers. Net revenues are gross revenues less the direct costs of purchased transportation. Revenue is recognized upon the delivery of freight, at which time the related transportation cost, including commission, is also recognized. At that time, our obligations are completed and collection of receivables is reasonably assured. Gross revenues and profits from agent support services consist primarily of interest on interest bearing loans.

Accounting Standards Codification Topic 605-45 “Revenue Recognition – Principal Agent Considerations” (ASC 605-45), establishes criteria for recognizing revenues on a gross or net basis. We are the primary obligor in our transactions, have all credit risk, maintain substantially all risk and rewards, have discretion in selecting the supplier and latitude in pricing decisions. Accordingly, we record all transactions at the gross amount, consistent with the provisions of ASC 605-45.

Income on all loans is recognized on the interest method. Accrual of interest is suspended at the earlier of the time at which collection becomes doubtful or the loan becomes delinquent. Interest income on impaired loans is recognized either as cash is collected or on a cost-recovery basis as conditions warrant.

Allowance for doubtful accounts

We continuously monitor the creditworthiness of our customers and have established an allowance for amounts that may become uncollectible in the future based on current economic trends, our historical payment and bad debt write-off experience, and any specific customer related collection issues.

Intangible assets

Goodwill represents the excess between the purchase price and the fair value of the net assets acquired. Goodwill is not amortized, but is tested at least annually for impairment using a fair value approach. Other intangible assets are primarily comprised of non-competition agreements which are being amortized on a straight-line basis of the estimated useful lives of three years.

Recently issued accounting standards

There have been no new accounting standards made effective during the year ended December 31, 2012, or that are not yet effective, that have significance, or potential significance, to our consolidated financial statements.

Off-balance sheet arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

26

Contractual obligations

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2012:

|  |  | Payments due by period |
Contractual Obligations |  | Total |  |  | Less than 1 year |  |  | 1-3 years |  |  | 3-5 years |  |  | More than 5 years |
Operating Lease Obligations |  | $ | 719,000 |  |  | $ | 219,000 |  |  | $ | 391,000 |  |  | $ | 109,000 |  |  |  | - |
Line of Credit |  | $ | 13,025,000 |  |  |  | - |  |  | $ | 13,025,000 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |
Total |  | $ | 13,744,000 |  |  | $ | 219,000 |  |  | $ | 13,416,000 |  |  | $ | 109,000 |  |  |  | - |

| Item 7A. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

As a smaller reporting company we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

| Item 8. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The response to this item is submitted as a separate section of this Report beginning on page F-1.

| Item 9. | CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES

None.

| Item 9A. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

| (a) | Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our president and chief financial officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended (the “Exchange Act”) Rules 13a-15(e) and 15-d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report (the “Evaluation Date”). Based upon that evaluation, the president and chief financial officer concluded that as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our president and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

In connection with its evaluation, our management discovered certain matters relating to the documentation of a new agent’s acquisition and a related truck acquisition transaction that occurred during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 that indicated a potential internal control weakness. In response to this discovery, incremental internal control measures were implemented to both identify the issue in future periods and prevent future occurrences from going undetected. There was no impact on our financial statements relating to this matter or on management’s conclusion as to the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the Evaluation Date.

27

| (b) | Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management evaluated our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control — Integrated Framework. As a result of this assessment and based on the criteria in this framework, management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2012, our internal control over financial reporting was effective.

| (c) | Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2012 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

| Item 9B. | OTHER INFORMATION

None.

PART III

| Item 10. | DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The following table sets forth the names, ages and positions of our directors and executive officers:

Name |  | Age |  | Position
Peter C. Einselen |  | 73 |  | Director
Mark K. Patterson |  | 50 |  | Director
Thomas C. Robertson |  | 67 |  | Director
Harry Wachtel |  | 54 |  | Chairman of the board and chief executive officer
Mark Weiss |  | 52 |  | National account executive and director
Michael P. Williams |  | 46 |  | President, chief operating officer and general counsel
William Wunderlich |  | 65 |  | Chief financial officer

28

PETER C. EINSELEN has been a director since January 1999. Since 2011, Mr. Einselen has been an account executive of Capital Guardian, LLC, a securities brokerage firm. Mr. Einselen was an account executive from 1990 to 2011 and served as senior vice president from 1990 to 2001 of Anderson & Strudwick, a brokerage firm. From 1983 to 1990, Mr. Einselen was employed by Scott and Stringfellow, Incorporated, a securities brokerage firm. Mr. Einselen’s professional experience and background as an executive and as one of our directors since 1999 have given him expertise and knowledge that is valuable to the Board and makes him well qualified to serve as one of our directors.

MARK K. PATTERSON has been a director since September 2010. Since April 2009, Mr. Patterson has been the executive vice president and chief financial officer of Appalachian Underwriters, Inc., a wholesale insurance brokerage outlet. Mr. Patterson also serves on the board of directors of several companies operating within the insurance industry. These include Accident Insurance Company, Inc. and Madison Insurance Company, Inc. both regulated property and casualty insurance companies domiciled in South Carolina; American Builders Insurance Company RRG, Inc., a risk retention group domiciled in Montana; the reinsurance companies Appalachian Reinsurance Ltd. of Bermuda and Cherokee Reinsurance Ltd. of the Cayman Islands; Bermuda based AIC Risk Management Ltd. and Bermuda American Intermediaries, Ltd.; and Monarch Intermediaries Ltd. of the Cayman Islands. In addition, Mr. Patterson serves as the president of American Employer Group, Inc., a Tennessee licensed professional employer organization. Prior to joining Appalachian Underwriters, Inc., from September 2005 until April 2009, Mr. Patterson served as the chief financial officer of Express 1 Expedited Solutions, Inc. (NYSE: XPO), a transportation services organization focused upon premium transportation solutions provided through several non-asset based or asset-light operating units. During this tenure, Mr. Patterson served on the Board of Directors of XPO from February 2006 until April 2009. Over the past 25 years, Mr. Patterson has held senior financial positions at several transportation, distribution and manufacturing companies, including a number of publicly traded organizations. Mr. Patterson has served as the director of corporate reporting at SIRVA, Inc. as well as the controller and director of financial planning and analysis at CRST International, Inc. He has also held the position of chief financial officer of Coastal Resources, Inc. and chief financial officer of Schilli Transportation Services, Inc. Mr. Patterson previously held various senior financial positions within U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc., including controller and director of treasury and finance. Prior to his career in the transportation sector, Mr. Patterson served as controller within the international manufacturing firm, Ahlstrom Filtration, Inc., and as controller within the domestic manufacturer PI, Inc. In 1987, Mr. Patterson received a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting from the University of Tennessee. Mr. Patterson’s professional experience as a senior executive at a number of public and private transportation, distribution and manufacturing companies, within both the domestic and international markets, together with his particular depth in financial and capital market matters, represents a valuable skill set needed by the Board and well qualifies him to serve as one of our directors.

THOMAS C. ROBERTSON, CFA, has been a director since January 1999. In July 2012 Mr. Robertson joined Redmond Asset Management, an investment advisory firm, as a portfolio manager. From 1977 to June 2012, Mr. Robertson was president and chief investment officer of Gardner & Robertson, an investment advisory firm. Mr. Robertson was senior vice president from 2005 to 2011, was president and chief financial officer from 1988 to 2005 and a director from 1988 to 2010 of Anderson & Strudwick, a brokerage firm. Mr. Robertson’s professional experience, particularly his background as a financial executive and as one of our directors since 1999, have given him expertise and knowledge that is valuable to the Board and makes him well qualified to serve as one of our directors.

HARRY WACHTEL joined us in conjunction with the acquisition of Sunteck and has been chairman of the board and our chief executive officer since December 2000. In addition, he also served as our president from 2000 through 2011. From 1997 through 2011 he was also president of Sunteck. From 1992 to 1997, he served as vice president of sales and marketing for Pioneer Services, Inc., a third party, non-asset based transportation logistics provider. Mr. Wachtel is an integral member of our Board and has been serving effectively on the Board with all the current members since joining the Board in 2000. As a senior executive officer of our company, he provides the Board with management’s perspective and insight into our business.

29

MARK WEISS joined us in conjunction with the acquisition of Sunteck and has been a director since December 2000. Since 1997, he has been employed by Sunteck as a national account executive and became executive vice president in 2011. From 1994 to 1997 he served as a national account executive for Pioneer Services, Inc., a third party, non-asset based transportation logistics provider. Mr. Weiss is the brother-in-law of Mr. Wunderlich, our executive vice president and chief financial officer. As our national account executive, Mr. Weiss is an integral member of our Board and has been serving effectively on the Board with all the current members since joining the Board in 2000. As a senior executive officer of our company, he provides the Board with management’s perspective and insight into our business.

MICHAEL P. WILLIAMS joined us in January 2007 as our chief operating officer and general counsel and became our president in 2011. From 2002 to 2006, Mr. Williams served as general counsel and vice president of legal and business affairs for Vexure, Inc., a logistics company. Prior to that, from 1999 to 2002, Mr. Williams also served as general counsel and vice president of legal and business affairs for Stonier Transportation Group, Inc., a trucking and brokerage company. During his tenure with Stonier and Vexure, Mr. Williams gained experience handling customer and vendor contract negotiations, risk management strategies, human resources and assets management, and transportation and employment litigation matters. Mr. Williams received his juris doctor cum laude from Thomas Cooley Law School, Lansing, Michigan and his masters degree (LL.M.) in taxation from the University of Florida, Gainesville. He has been a member of the Florida Bar since 1995.

WILLIAM WUNDERLICH joined us in October 1992 as our vice president - finance, became chief financial officer in January 1993, president in January 1999 and, in conjunction with the acquisition of Sunteck, became our executive vice president in December 2000. From 1990 to 1992, he served as vice president of Goldstein Affiliates, Inc., a public adjusting company. From 1981 to 1990, he served as executive vice president, chief financial officer and a director of Novo Corporation, a manufacturer of consumer products. Mr. Wunderlich is a Certified Public Accountant with a B.A. degree in Accounting and Economics from the City University of New York at Queens College. Mr. Wunderlich is the brother-in-law of Mr. Weiss, an executive officer and one of our directors.

Audit Committee

Our Board has an audit committee which reviews the scope and results of the audit and other services provided by our independent accountants and our internal controls. The committee is comprised of Messrs. Patterson, Einselen and Robertson, our non-employee independent outside directors.

The Board has adopted a written charter for the audit committee, a copy of which is available on our website at www.suntecktransportgroup.com by clicking on “Investor Relations.” Under its charter, the audit committee must pre-approve all engagements of our independent accountants unless an exception to such pre-approval exists under the Exchange Act or the rules of the SEC. Each year, the independent accountants’ retention to audit our financial statements, including the associated fee, is approved by the committee before the filing of the preceding year’s annual report on Form 10-K. At the beginning of the fiscal year, the audit committee will evaluate other known potential engagements of the independent accountants, including the scope of the work proposed to be performed and the proposed fees, and approve or reject each service, taking into account whether the services are permissible under applicable law and the possible impact of each non-audit service on the independent accountants’ independence from management. At each subsequent committee meeting, the committee will receive updates on the services actually provided by the independent accountants, and management may present additional services for approval. Typically, these would be services such as due diligence for an acquisition that would not have been known at the beginning of the year.

Since the May 6, 2003 effective date of the SEC rules stating that an accountant is not independent of an audit client if the services it provides to the client are not appropriately approved, each new engagement of Dworken, Hillman, LaMorte & Sterczala, P.C. was approved in advance by the audit committee, and none of those engagements made use of the de minimis exception to pre-approval contained in the SEC’s rules.

30

The Board has determined that the chairman of the audit committee, Mr. Patterson, is an “audit committee financial expert,” as that term is defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K, and “independent” under NASDAQ’s listing standards and Section 10A(m)(3) of the Exchange Act. The audit committee met four times in 2012.

Director Nominations

The Board has not created a nominating committee. Instead, the functions of a nominating committee, including oversight of corporate governance, is performed by the Board as a whole. The Board regards this policy as advantageous to AutoInfo in view of the relatively small size of the company (compared to publicly held corporations generally), and the size and relative stability of the Board.

The Board considers and establishes procedures regarding recommendations for nomination to the Board, including nominations submitted by stockholders. Recommendations of stockholders should be sent to us in a timely manner, either in person or by certified mail, to the attention of our Corporate Secretary. Any recommendations submitted to the secretary should be in writing and should include whatever supporting material the stockholder considers appropriate in support of that recommendation but must include the information that would be required to be disclosed under the SEC’s rules in a proxy statement soliciting proxies for the election of such candidate and a signed consent of the candidate to serve as a director if elected. The Board will evaluate all potential candidates in the same manner, regardless of the source of the recommendation. Based on the information provided to the Board, it will make an initial determination whether to conduct a full evaluation of a candidate. As part of the full evaluation process, the Board may conduct interviews, obtain additional background information and conduct reference checks of the candidate, among other things. The Board may also ask the candidate to meet with management and other members of the Board. Although the Board has not adopted a formal policy regarding diversity, it considers a broad range of factors in evaluating a candidate, including the advantages to the company that come from having a board of directors comprised of persons with diverse experiences and perspectives. Thus, the consideration of diversity is not limited to matters of race, gender or national origin, but encompasses the candidate’s broad background and is evaluated in light of the existing composition of the Board.

Leadership Structure

The Board considers and establishes the appropriate leadership structure for us, and has concluded that we and our stockholders are best served by not having a formal policy on whether the same individual should serve as both chief executive officer and chairman of the board. The Board believes that it is important to retain the flexibility to make this determination based on the circumstances at the time of the determination, recognizing that no single leadership structure will best serve us and our stockholders in all cases. This allows it to use its experience and knowledge to elect the most qualified director as chairman of the board, while maintaining its ability to separate the roles of chairman and chief executive officer if it deems it to be advantageous to AutoInfo. In making this determination, the Board will consider the potential advantages that may come from being chaired by a person other than the chief executive officer.

Mr. Wachtel, our chief executive officer, serves as our chairman of the board. The Board has determined that having Mr. Wachtel serve as both the chairman and chief executive officer is in the best interest of Autoinfo and our stockholders. We believe this structure makes the best use of the chief executive officer’s extensive knowledge of our business and personnel, our strategic initiatives and our industry, and also fosters real-time communication between management and the Board.

31

Oversight of Risk Management

The Board recognizes that companies face a variety of risks, including credit risk, liquidity risk, strategic risk and operational risk. It believes an effective risk management system will (i) timely identify the material risks that we face, (ii) communicate necessary information with respect to material risks to senior executives and, as appropriate, to the Board or relevant Board committee, (iii) implement appropriate and responsive risk management strategies consistent with our risk profile, and (iv) integrate risk management into our decision-making. The Board encourages and management promotes a corporate culture that incorporates risk management into our corporate strategy and day-to-day business operations. The Board also continually works, with the input of our management and executive officers, to assess and analyze the most likely areas of future risk for us.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and other persons performing similar functions. This code of ethics is posted on our website at www.suntecktransportgroup.com.

Section 16(a) beneficial ownership reporting compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our officers and directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Officers, directors and greater than ten-percent stockholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on review of the copies of such forms furnished to us, or written representations that no Forms 5 were required, we believe that all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our officers and directors were complied with during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.

32

| Item 11. | EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to compensation for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 earned by or paid to our chief executive officer and our two other most highly compensated executive officers in 2012 whose total compensation exceeded $100,000 (the “named executive officers”).

Summary Compensation Table – 2012

Name and Principal Position |  | Year |  |  | Salary |  |  | Option Awards (1) |  |  | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Com- pensation |  |  | All Other Compensation (2) |  |  | Total |
Harry M. Wachtel, |  |  | 2012 |  |  | $ | 250,000 |  |  | $ | - |  |  | $ | 495,000 |  |  | $ | 20,000 |  |  | $ | 765,000 |
Chairman of the board and |  |  | 2011 |  |  | $ | 250,000 |  |  | $ | 35,000 |  |  | $ | 418,000 |  |  | $ | 20,000 |  |  | $ | 723,000 |
chief executive officer (3) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
William I. Wunderlich, |  |  | 2012 |  |  | $ | 175,000 |  |  | $ | - |  |  | $ | 495,000 |  |  | $ | 20,000 |  |  | $ | 690,000 |
Executive vice president |  |  | 2011 |  |  | $ | 175,000 |  |  | $ | 21,000 |  |  | $ | 418,000 |  |  | $ | 20,000 |  |  | $ | 634,000 |
and chief financial officer |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Michael P. Williams, |  |  | 2012 |  |  | $ | 205,000 |  |  | $ | - |  |  | $ | 280,000 |  |  | $ | 19,000 |  |  | $ | 504,000 |
President and chief |  |  | 2011 |  |  | $ | 205,000 |  |  | $ | 38,000 |  |  | $ | 236,000 |  |  | $ | 18,000 |  |  | $ | 498,000 |
operating officer(3) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |

_______________________

| (1) | Reflects the fair value of the stock option awards granted during the year in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, Accounting for Stock Compensation. The assumptions underlying the valuation of equity awards are set forth in Note 7 of our financial statements, included elsewhere in this report.

| (2) | Includes company matching contributions to a qualifying 401(K) plan and reimbursed automobile expenses.

| (3) | In November 2011, Mr. Williams replaced Mr. Wachtel as our president.

Discussion of Summary Compensation

We believe that the total compensation paid to our named executive officers for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 achieves the overall objectives of our executive compensation program. We believe that, in accordance with our overall objectives, executive compensation for 2012 was competitive with comparable companies. Executive compensation opportunities were weighted more heavily to pay for performance.

Non-equity incentive plan compensation paid out for 2012 were annual bonuses paid under the terms of the executives’ employment agreements described below. The level of bonuses reflected our 2012 results, with $278.2 million in GAAP revenues, representing an increase of 9.5% over pro-forma 2011, and GAAP income from operations of $7.4 million representing an increase of 14.8% over pro-forma 2011.

Employment Agreements and Severance Benefits

On February 7, 2011 we entered into amended and restated employment agreements (the “Employment Agreements”) with each of Harry Wachtel, William Wunderlich and Michael Williams for their continued employment with us as president and chief executive officer, chief financial officer and chief operating officer, respectively. The Employment Agreements are substantially identical and provide, among other things, as follows:

33

Term: The terms of the Employment Agreements expire on December 31, 2015, subject to earlier termination as provided therein.

Base Salary: $250,000, $175,000 and $205,000 per annum, for Harry Wachtel, William Wunderlich and Michael Williams, respectively, payable in accordance with our then prevailing payroll policy.

Annual Bonus: The Employment Agreements for Messrs. Wachtel and Wunderlich provide for an annual bonus equal to 10% of our first $1,250,000 of Operating Profit (as defined therein) plus an additional 5% of any Operating Profit in excess of $1,250,000; provided, however, the total annual aggregate salary and bonus payable to Messrs. Wachtel and Wunderlich are limited to a maximum of $750,000 and $675,000, respectively.

The Employment Agreement for Mr. Williams provides for an annual bonus equal to 2% of our first $3,000,000 of Operating Profit plus an additional: (i) three percent (3%) of any Operating Profit in excess of $3,000,000 but less than or equal to $4,000,000; (ii) four percent (4%) of any Operating Profit in excess of $4,000,000 but less than or equal to $5,000,000; and (iii) five percent (5%) of any Operating Profit in excess of $5,000,000; provided, however, the total annual aggregate salary and bonus payable to Mr. Williams is limited to a maximum of $485,000.

Change in Control Payments: The Employment Agreements provide that in the event of a Change in Control (as defined therein), Messrs. Wachtel, Wunderlich and Williams shall each receive a lump-sum cash payment equal to one and one-half times the respective named executive officer’s Base Compensation (as defined therein), plus one and one-half times of his average Annual Bonus for the prior two years. Further, upon a Change in Control, we may, within a specified period, terminate the named executive officer’s employment with us without further liability to the named executive officer other than with respect to the provision of continued medical coverage through December 31, 2015.

Incentive Compensation: The named executive officers are eligible to receive bonuses, to be determined at the sole discretion of the Board and payable in accordance with our then prevailing policy.

Benefits. During the employment term, each individual is entitled to participate in any of our then existing retirement plans, pension, insurance, health, disability or other benefit plans or programs.

In November 2011, Mr. Williams replaced Mr. Wachtel as our president.

Tax Deductibility of Executive Compensation

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1996, as amended, generally disallows a tax deduction to public companies for compensation over $1 million paid to the chief executive officer and certain other most highly compensated executive officers (excluding the chief financial officer), unless the compensation is considered performance based. The compensation to named executive officers in fiscal 2012 and 2011 did not exceed the $1 million limit, and we expect executive compensation for 2013 also will qualify for deductibility.

Although deductibility of compensation is preferred, tax deductibility is not a primary objective of our compensation programs. We believe that achieving our compensation objectives set forth above is more important than the benefit of tax deductibility and we reserve the right to maintain flexibility in how we compensate our executive officers that may result in limiting the deductibility of amounts of compensation from time to time.

Indemnification Arrangements

Our Certificate of Incorporation provides that we indemnify and hold harmless each of our directors and officers to the fullest extent authorized by the Delaware General Corporation Law, against all expense, liability and loss (including attorney's fees, judgments, fines, ERISA excise taxes or penalties and amounts paid or to be paid in settlement) reasonably incurred or suffered by such person in connection therewith.

34

Our Certificate of Incorporation also provides that a director will not be personally liable to us or to our stockholders for monetary damages for breach of the fiduciary duty of care as a director. This provision does not eliminate or limit the liability of a director:

| · | for breach of his or her duty of loyalty to us or to our stockholders;

| · | for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law;

| · | under Section 174 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (relating to unlawful payments or dividends or unlawful stock repurchases or redemptions); or

| · | for any improper benefit.

Outstanding Equity Awards

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to outstanding equity awards at December 31, 2012 with respect to the named executive officers.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

|  | Option Awards (1)
Name |  | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable |  |  | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable |  |  | Option Exercise Price |  |  | Option Expiration Date
Harry M. Wachtel |  |  | 100,000 |  |  | 400,000 | (2) |  | $ | .76 |  |  | 2/14/2017
William I. Wunderlich |  |  | 60,000 |  |  | 240,000 | (2) |  | $ | .76 |  |  | 2/14/2017
Michael P. Williams |  |  | 400,000 |  |  |  |  |  | $ | .29 |  |  | 3/16/2015
Michael P. Williams |  |  | 90,000 |  |  | 360,000 | (3) |  | $ | .78 |  |  | 12/15/2017

| (1) | All options are subject to accelerated vesting in the event of death, disability or upon the event of a “change in control,” and in connection with certain terminations of employment as described above under the heading “Employment Agreements and Severance Benefits.”

| (2) | Vests in five equal annual installments from February 15, 2012 through February 15, 2016.

| (3) | Vests in five equal annual installments from December 15, 2012 through December 15, 2016.

Compensation of Directors

We pay annual director’s fees of $12,500 to each of Messrs. Robertson and Einselen and $18,750 to Mr. Patterson as chairman of the audit and compensation committees. Directors are reimbursed for the costs relating to attending Board and committee meetings. No options were granted to directors in 2012. In 2012 we paid $5,000 to each of Messrs. Robertson, Einselen and Patterson for their services as members of a Special Committee of the Board.

35

The following table provides compensation information for the year ended December 31, 2012 for each of the independent members of our Board.

Director Compensation

Name (1) |  | Year |  | Fees |  |  | Option Awards |  |  | Total |
Thomas C. Robertson |  | 2012 |  | $ | 17,500 |  |  | $ | - |  |  | $ | 17,500 |
Peter C. Einselen |  | 2012 |  | $ | 17,500 |  |  | $ | - |  |  | $ | 17,500 |
Mark K. Patterson |  | 2012 |  | $ | 23,750 |  |  | $ | - |  |  | $ | 23,750 |

(1) At December 31, 2012: (i) Mr. Robertson held options exercisable for an aggregate of 600,000 shares of common stock at exercise prices ranging from $0.32 to $1.17 per share; (ii) Mr. Einselen held options exercisable for an aggregate of 622,500 shares of common stock at exercise prices ranging from $0.20 to $1.17 per share; and (iii) Mr. Patterson held options exercisable for an aggregate of 550,000 shares of common stock with exercise prices ranging from $0.56 to $0.78 per share. The number of shares to be acquired upon exercise assumes that the options are fully-vested.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Year Ended December 31, 2012

Plan Category |  | Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights |  |  | Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights |  |  | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) |
|  | (a) |  |  | (b) |  |  | (c) |
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1992, 1997, 1999, 2003 and 2006) |  |  | 4,536,000 |  |  | $ | 0.65 |  |  |  | 4,824,000 |
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders (1) |  |  | 2,595,000 |  |  | $ | 0.67 |  |  |  | 2,091,000 |
Total |  |  | 7,131,000 |  |  | $ | 0.65 |  |  |  | 6,915,000 |

| (1) | Includes the following equity compensation plans:

| · | In 2006, we established the 2006 Independent Sales Agent Stock Option Plan (the “Sales Agent Plan”) to align the interests of our independent sales agents and affiliates with those of our stockholders, to afford an incentive to such sales agents to continue as such, to increase their efforts on our behalf and to promote the success of our business. Generally, the Sales Agent Plan is administered by our Board and provides (i) for the granting of non-qualified stock options, (ii) that the maximum term for options granted under the plan is 10 years and (iii) that the exercise price for the options may not be less than 115% of the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant.

| · | In 2005, we established the 2005 Independent Sales Agent Stock Option Plan (the “2005 Sales Agent Plan”) to align the interests of our independent sales agents and affiliates with those of our stockholders, to afford an incentive to such sales agents to continue as such, to increase their efforts on our behalf and to promote the success of our business. Generally, the 2005 Sales Agent Plan is administered by our Board and provides (i) for the granting of non-qualified stock options, (ii) that the maximum term for options granted under the plan is 10 years and (iii) that the exercise price for the options may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant.

36

| Item 12. | SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of Autoinfo’s common stock as of March 22, 2013 for (i) each person known by Autoinfo to own beneficially more than 5% of Autoinfo’s common stock, (ii) each of our directors, (iii) our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and each of our other three most highly compensated executive officers, and (iv) all directors and executive officers of Autoinfo as a group. Except as otherwise indicated, beneficial ownership includes both voting and investment power.

We determined beneficial ownership in accordance with rules promulgated by the SEC pursuant to which a person is deemed to be a beneficial owner of securities that can be acquired by such person within 60 days from March 22, 2013 upon the exercise of options and warrants or conversion of convertible securities. Each beneficial owner’s percentage ownership is determined by assuming that options, warrants and convertible securities that are held by such person (but not held by any other person) and that are exercisable or convertible within 60 days from March 22, 2013 have been exercised or converted. Except as otherwise indicated, we believe that the persons or entities named in the following table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of our common stock as beneficially owned by them, subject to community property laws where applicable and all information with respect to beneficial ownership has been furnished to us by the respective stockholder.

Name of |  | Shares of Common Stock |  |  | Percentage |
Beneficial Owner (1) |  | Beneficially Owned |  |  | Of Ownership |
(i) Directors and Executive Officers |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Peter C. Einselen |  |  | 708,931 | (2) |  |  | 2.0 | %
Mark K. Patterson |  |  | 196,667 | (3) |  |  | * |
Thomas C. Robertson |  |  | 612,431 | (4) |  |  | 1.8 | %
Harry Wachtel |  |  | 6,386,503 | (5) |  |  | 18.5 | %
Mark Weiss |  |  | 951,503 | (6) |  |  | 2.7 | %
Michael P. Williams |  |  | 493,000 | (7) |  |  | 1.4 | %
William I. Wunderlich |  |  | 1,442,342 | (8) |  |  | 4.2 | %
All executive officers and directors as a group (7 persons) |  |  | 9,532,532 | (9) |  |  | 26.3 | %
(ii) 5% Stockholders |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
James T. Martin |  |  | 5,620,000 | (10) |  |  | 16.4 | %
Kinderhook, LP |  |  | 6,278,312 | (11) |  |  | 18.3 | %
Peter H. Kamin |  |  | 1,804,900 | (12) |  |  | 5.3 | %
Rangeley Capital, LLC, Rangeley Capital Partners, LP and Christopher DeMuth, Jr. |  |  | 3,589,000 | (13) |  |  | 10.5 | %
Ancora Advisors LLC and Richard Barone |  |  | 2,026,655 | (12) |  |  | 5.9 | %

* Less than one percent.

| (1) | Unless otherwise indicated below, each director, executive officer and each 5% stockholder has sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares beneficially owned. The address for Mr. Wachtel is c/o AutoInfo, Inc., 6413 Congress Avenue, Suite 260, Boca Raton, FL 33487. The address for Dr. Martin is c/o Bermuda Trust Company, Compass Point Road, 9 Bermudian Road, Hamilton HM11, Bermuda. The address for Kinderhook, LP is One Executive Drive, Suite 160, Fort Lee, NJ 07024. The address for Peter H. Kamin is One Avery Street, 17B, Boston, MA 02111. The address for Rangeley Capital, LLC, Rangeley Capital Partners, LP and Christopher DeMuth, Jr. is 3 Forest Street New Canaan, Connecticut 06840. The address for Ancora Advisors LLC and Richard Barone is One Chagrin Highlands, 2000 Auburn Drive, Suite 300, Cleveland, OH 44122.

| (2) | Includes 402,500 shares issuable upon the exercise of vested stock options.

| (3) | Includes 196,667 shares issuable upon the exercise of vested stock options.

| (4) | Includes 380,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of vested stock options.

37

| (5) | Includes 1,258,845 shares with respect to which Mr. Wachtel has been granted voting rights pursuant to voting proxy agreements and 200,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of vested stock options.

| (6) | Includes 851,503 with respect to which Mr. Weiss has granted voting rights to Mr. Wachtel pursuant to a voting proxy agreement. Mr. Weiss retains full control over the disposition of these shares. Includes 100,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of vested stock options.

| (7) | Includes 490,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of vested stock options.

| (8) | Includes 407,342 shares with respect to which Mr. Wunderlich has granted voting rights to Mr. Wachtel pursuant to a voting proxy agreement. Mr. Wunderlich retains full control over the disposition of these shares. Includes 120,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of vested stock options.

| (9) | Includes 1,889,167 shares issuable upon exercise of options or warrants owned by members of this group and exercisable at the Record Date or within 60 days thereafter.

| (10) | The information with respect to this stockholder was provided by his broker and/or his agents.

| (11) | The information with respect to this stockholder was derived from the stockholders most recent Exchange Act filing with the SEC. Kinderhook GP, LLC (the “General Partner”), is the general partner of the Kinderhook, LP (the “Partnership”). Mr. Stephen J. Clearman and Mr. Tushar Shah are co-managing members of the General Partner and as a result, Mr. Clearman and Mr. Shah may be deemed to control the General Partner and the Partnership. In addition, Mr. Clearman and Mr. Shah are co-managing members of Kinderhook Partners, LLC (the “Investment Adviser”), which is responsible for making investment decisions on the Partnership’s behalf. Accordingly, Mr. Clearman and Mr. Shah may be deemed to have a beneficial interest in the shares of Autoinfo’s common stock by virtue of their indirect control of the Partnership’s, General Partner’s, and Investment Adviser’s power to vote and/or dispose of the shares of AutoInfo’s common stock. Mr. Clearman and Mr. Shah specifically disclaim beneficial ownership of the shares of AutoInfo’s common stock except to the extent of their pecuniary interest, if any, therein. Mr. Clearman and Mr. Shah specifically disclaim beneficial ownership of the shares of AutoInfo’s common stock except to the extent of their pecuniary interest, if any, therein.

| (12) | The information with respect to this stockholder was derived from the stockholder’s most recent Exchange Act filing with the SEC.

| (13) | The information with respect to this stockholder was derived from the stockholder’s most recent Exchange Act filing with the SEC. Rangeley Capital, LLC, Rangeley Capital Partners, LP and Christopher DeMuth, Jr. share the power to vote and/or dispose of the shares of AutoInfo’s common stock and disclaim membership in a group. Christopher DeMuth, Jr. disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein. Christopher DeMuth, Jr. is the managing member of Rangeley Capital, LLC and the managing member of Rangeley Capital GP, LLC, who executed the Exchange Act filing on behalf of Rangeley Capital Partners, LP.

38

Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Certain relationships and related transactions

William Wunderlich, our executive vice president and chief financial officer, is the brother-in-law of Mark Weiss, who serves as a national account executive and director of AutoInfo.

Related-party transactions between a director or executive officer and AutoInfo must be reviewed and approved by the audit committee or the Board, with any interested director recusing himself or herself from the vote on the matter. A director or executive officer with a potential conflict of interest is required to promptly disclose the potential conflict to directors or executive officers who are in a position to appropriately represent the interests of AutoInfo and ensure that any transaction is properly reviewed and approved.

Director Independence

The Board has determined that Mark Patterson, Thomas Robertson and Peter Einselen (the “Independent Directors”) are independent as that term is defined in NASDAQ listing standards and under applicable rules and regulations of the SEC. Messrs. Patterson, Robertson and Einselen are the sole members of our audit committee and our compensation committee and are independent for such purposes.

Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The aggregate fees billed by our principal accounting firm, Dworken, Hillman, LaMorte & Sterczala, P.C., for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Audit fees |  | $ | 129,000 |  |  | $ | 127,000 |
Audit related fees |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Tax fees |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
All other fees |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Total fees |  | $ | 129,000 |  |  | $ | 127,000 |

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

Our audit committee charter provides that the audit committee will pre-approve audit services and non-audit services to be provided by our independent auditor before the auditor is engaged to render these services. The audit committee may consult with management in the decision-making process, but may not delegate this authority to management. The audit committee may delegate its authority to pre-approve services to one or more committee members, provided that the designees present the pre-approvals to the full committee at the next committee meeting.

39

PART IV

Item 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

| (a) | The following documents are filed as part of this report:

(1) Financial Statements – See the Index to the consolidated financial statements on page F-1.

| (b) | Exhibits:

Exhibit No. |  | Description
No. 2A |  | Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 28, 2013, by and among the Company, AutoInfo Holdings, LLC, and AutoInfo Acquisition Corp. (17)
No. 3A |  | Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, as amended. (6)
No. 3B |  | Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company. (3)
No. 4A |  | Specimen Stock Certificate. (1)
No. 10A |  | **1997 Stock Option Plan. (4)
No. 10B |  | **1997 Non-Employee Stock Option Plan. (4)
No. 10C |  | **1999 Stock Option Plan. (5)
No. 10D |  | **2003 Stock Option Plan. (8)
No. 10E |  | **2005 Independent Sales Agent Stock Option Plan. (9)
No. 10F |  | **2006 Stock Option Plan. (9)
No. 10G |  | **2006 Independent Sales Agent Stock Option Plan. (9)
No. 10H |  | Loan and Security Agreement between Regions Bank and AutoInfo, Inc., et al. (10)
No. 10I |  | First Amendment to the Loan and Security Agreement between Regions Bank and AutoInfo, Inc., et al. dated March 24, 2011.(11)
No. 10J |  | **Employment Agreement between AutoInfo, Inc. and Harry M. Wachtel dated January 1, 2011. (12)
No. 10K |  | **Employment Agreement between AutoInfo, Inc. and William I. Wunderlich dated January 1, 2011. (12)
No. 10L |  | **Employment Agreement between AutoInfo, Inc. and Michael P. Williams dated January 1, 2011. (12)
No. 10M |  | **Employment Agreement between AutoInfo, Inc. and Mark Weiss dated July 1, 2011 (16)
No. 10N |  | Second Amendment to the Loan and Security Agreement, dated April 28, 2011, between AutoInfo, Inc. and Regions Bank (13)
No. 10O |  | Asset Purchase Agreement dated July 8, 2011 (14)
No. 10P |  | Third Amendment to the Loan and Security Agreement, dated November 1, 2011, between the Company and Regions Bank (15)
No. 10Q |  | Voting Agreement, dated February 28, 2013, by and among AutoInfo Holdings, LLC and stockholders and option holders of the Company signatories thereto. (17)
No. 14A |  | Code of Ethics. (7)
No. 21A |  | Subsidiaries of the Registrant. *

40

No. 23A |  | Consent of Dworken, Hillman, LaMorte & Sterczala, P.C., independent registered public accounting firm.*
No. 31A |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
No. 31B |  | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
No. 32A |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
No. 32B |  | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
101.INS *** |  | XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH*** |  | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL*** |  | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.LAB*** |  | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE*** |  | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF*** |  | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

*Filed as an exhibit hereto.

**Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

***Furnished with this report. In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the information in these exhibits shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability under that section, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.

| (1) | This Exhibit was filed as Exhibit to our Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-15465) and is incorporated herein by reference.

| (2) | This Exhibit was filed as an Exhibit our definitive proxy statement dated October 2, 1992 and is incorporated herein by reference.

| (3) | This Exhibit was filed as an Exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 30, 1995 and is incorporated herein by reference.

| (4) | This Exhibit was filed as an Exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997 and is incorporated herein by reference.

| (5) | This Exhibit was filed as an Exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 and is incorporated herein by reference.

| (6) | This Exhibit was filed as an Exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2000 and is incorporated herein by reference.

| (7) | This Exhibit was filed as an Exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 and is incorporated herein by reference.

| (8) | This Exhibit was filed with our Definitive Information Statement on Schedule 14C, filed on July 7, 2003 and is incorporated herein by reference.

| (9) | This Exhibit was filed as an Exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 and is incorporated herein by reference.

| (10) | This Exhibit was filed as an Exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and is incorporated herein by reference.

| (11) | This Exhibit was filed as an Exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and is incorporated herein by reference.

41

| (12) | This Exhibit was filed as an Exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 7, 2011 and is incorporated herein by reference.

| (13) | Filed with the SEC on May 3, 2011 as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K and is incorporated herein by reference.

| (14) | Filed with the SEC on July 13, 2011 as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K and incorporated herein by reference.

| (15) | Filed with the SEC on November 14, 2011 as an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and incorporated herein by reference.

| (16) | This Exhibit was filed as an Exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 and is incorporated herein by reference.

| (17) | This Exhibit was filed as an Exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K on March 5, 2013 and is incorporated herein by reference.

(c) Information required by schedules called for under Regulation S-X is either not applicable or is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

42

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d), the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on March 29, 2013 on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

| AutoInfo, Inc.
| By: | /s/ Harry M. Wachtel
|  | Harry M. Wachtel, Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated.

/s/ Harry M. Wachtel |  |  |  |
Harry M. Wachtel |  | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board (Principal Executive Officer) |  | March 29, 2013
/s/ William I. Wunderlich |  |  |  |
William I. Wunderlich |  | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) |  | March 29, 2013
/s/ Mark Weiss |  |  |  |
Mark Weiss |  | Director |  | March 29, 2013
/s/ Peter C. Einselen |  |  |  |
Peter C. Einselen |  | Director |  | March 29, 2013
/s/ Thomas C. Robertson |  |  |  |
Thomas C. Robertson |  | Director |  | March 29, 2013
/s/ Mark K. Patterson |  |  |  |
Mark K. Patterson |  | Director |  | March 29, 2013

43

AUTOINFO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |  | F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 |  | F-3
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 |  | F-4
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 |  | F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 |  | F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |  | F-7

Information required by schedules called for under Regulation S-X is either not applicable or is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes thereto.

F-1

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

AutoInfo, Inc.

Boca Raton, Florida

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of AutoInfo, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of AutoInfo, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

March 25, 2013

Shelton, Connecticut

| /s/ Dworken, Hillman, LaMorte & Sterczala, P.C.
| Dworken, Hillman, LaMorte & Sterczala, P.C.

F-2

AUTOINFO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

|  | December 31, |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
ASSETS |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Current assets: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash and cash equivalents |  | $ | 40,000 |  |  | $ | 136,000 |
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $357,000 and $509,000 as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively |  |  | 42,361,000 |  |  |  | 40,658,000 |
Deferred income taxes |  |  | - |  |  |  | 42,000 |
Prepaid expenses |  |  | 1,388,000 |  |  |  | 1,415,000 |
Current portion of advances and other assets |  |  | 3,666,000 |  |  |  | 1,589,000 |
Total current assets |  |  | 47,455,000 |  |  |  | 43,840,000 |
Fixed assets, net of depreciation |  |  | 1,045,000 |  |  |  | 647,000 |
Advances and other assets, net of current portion |  |  | 5,770,000 |  |  |  | 4,551,000 |
Goodwill and other intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $30,000 as of December 31, 2012 |  |  | 10,134,000 |  |  |  | 10,069,000 |
|  | $ | 64,404,000 |  |  | $ | 59,107,000 |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Current liabilities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |  | $ | 21,468,000 |  |  | $ | 17,942,000 |
Deferred income taxes |  |  | 566,000 |  |  |  | - |
|  | $ | 22,034,000 |  |  |  | 17,942,000 |
Loan payable |  |  | 13,025,000 |  |  |  | 16,273,000 |
Commitments and contingencies |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Stockholders’ equity : |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Common stock - authorized 100,000,000 shares, $.001 par value; issued and outstanding 34,300,000 and 34,074,000 as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively |  |  | 34,000 |  |  |  | 34,000 |
Additional paid-in capital |  |  | 20,472,000 |  |  |  | 20,375,000 |
Retained earnings |  |  | 8,839,000 |  |  |  | 4,483,000 |
Total stockholders’ equity |  |  | 29,345,000 |  |  |  | 24,892,000 |
|  | $ | 64,404,000 |  |  | $ | 59,107,000 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-3

AUTOINFO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

|  | For The Years Ended December 31, |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Gross revenues |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Transportation services |  | $ | 276,198,000 |  |  | $ | 318,080,000 |
Agent support services |  |  | 1,973,000 |  |  |  | 1,890,000 |
Total revenues |  |  | 278,171,000 |  |  |  | 319,970,000 |
Purchased transportation |  |  | 221,366,000 |  |  |  | 259,493,000 |
Purchased equipment for resale |  |  | 1,178,000 |  |  |  | 566,000 |
Commissions |  |  | 34,379,000 |  |  |  | 41,371,000 |
Operating expenses |  |  | 13,830,000 |  |  |  | 12,108,000 |
|  |  | 270,753,000 |  |  |  | 313,538,000 |
Income from operations |  |  | 7,418,000 |  |  |  | 6,432,000 |
Interest expense |  |  | 323,000 |  |  |  | 520,000 |
Income before income taxes |  |  | 7,095,000 |  |  |  | 5,912,000 |
Income taxes |  |  | 2,739,000 |  |  |  | 2,274,000 |
Net income |  | $ | 4,356,000 |  |  | $ | 3,638,000 |
Net income per share: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Basic |  | $ | .13 |  |  | $ | .11 |
Diluted |  | $ | .12 |  |  | $ | .10 |
Weighted average number of common shares: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Basic |  |  | 34,151,000 |  |  |  | 33,908,000 |
Diluted |  |  | 36,029,000 |  |  |  | 35,396,000 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4

AUTOINFO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

|  | Shares of |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Common |  |  |  |  |  | Additional |  |  |  |
|  | Stock |  |  | Common |  |  | Paid - In |  |  | Retained |
|  | Outstanding |  |  | Stock |  |  | Capital |  |  | Earnings |
Balance, January 1, 2011 |  |  | 33,513,000 |  |  | $ | 34,000 |  |  | $ | 20,228,000 |  |  | $ | 845,000 |
Exercise of stock options |  |  | 561,000 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 16,000 |  |  |  |  |
Stock-based compensation expense |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 131,000 |  |  |  |  |
Net income |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3,638,000 |
Balance, December 31, 2011 |  |  | 34,074,000 |  |  | $ | 34,000 |  |  | $ | 20,375,000 |  |  | $ | 4,483,000 |
Exercise of stock options |  |  | 226,000 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 24,000 |  |  |  |  |
Stock-based compensation expense |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 73,000 |  |  |  |  |
Net income |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4,356,000 |
Balance, December 31, 2012 |  |  | 34,300,000 |  |  | $ | 34,000 |  |  | $ | 20,472,000 |  |  | $ | 8,839,000 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-5

AUTOINFO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

|  | For The Years Ended December 31, |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Cash flows from operating activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net income |  | $ | 4,356,000 |  |  | $ | 3,638,000 |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Change in allowance for doubtful accounts |  |  | (152,000 | ) |  |  | 117,000 |
Change in allowance for loans and advances |  |  | 150,000 |  |  |  | 200,000 |
Depreciation and amortization expenses |  |  | 298,000 |  |  |  | 202,000 |
Stock-based compensation expense |  |  | 73,000 |  |  |  | 131,000 |
Deferred income taxes |  |  | 608,000 |  |  |  | 93,000 |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Accounts receivable |  |  | (1,551,000 | ) |  |  | 8,961,000 |
Prepaid expenses |  |  | 26,000 |  |  |  | (275,000 | )
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |  |  | 3,526,000 |  |  |  | (5,248,000 | )
Net cash provided by operating activities |  |  | 7,334,000 |  |  |  | 7,819,000 |
Cash flows from investing activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Advances and other assets |  |  | (3,446,000 | ) |  |  | (1,488,000 | )
Acquisition of operating assets |  |  | (96,000 | ) |  |  |  |
Capital expenditures |  |  | (665,000 | ) |  |  | (369,000 | )
Net cash (used in) investing activities |  |  | (4,207,000 | ) |  |  | (1,857,000 | )
Cash flows from financing activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Exercise of stock options |  |  | 24,000 |  |  |  | 17,000 |
Change in loan payable, net |  |  | (3,247,000 | ) |  |  | (6,159,000 | )
Net cash (used in) financing activities |  |  | (3,223,000 | ) |  |  | (6,142,000 | )
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |  |  | (96,000 | ) |  |  | (180,000 | )
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |  |  | 136,000 |  |  |  | 316,000 |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year |  | $ | 40,000 |  |  | $ | 136,000 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-6

AUTOINFO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012 and 2011

Note 1 - Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Business Overview

The Company operates in two business segments, non-asset based transportation services and agent support services. The non-asset based transportation services segment includes our brokerage and contract carrier services which are provided through a network of independent sales agents throughout the United States and Canada. Revenue in this segment is generated from freight transportation transactions. The agent support services segment includes an array of services that we provide to our agent network to support and encourage the expansion of our agents’ businesses, primarily financial support through interest bearing long-term loans, sales type leases (which facilitate the acquisition of trucks by owner-operators), and non-interest bearing short-term loans, as well as other services including training, margin analysis, marketing assistance, industry and market segment data, and business analysis tools. Revenue in this segment consists primarily of interest on interest bearing loans and profits and interest earned on sales-type leases.

On July 8, 2011, we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Acquisition Agreement”) with Eleets Transportation Company, Inc., a Florida corporation (the “Significant Agent”) to acquire substantially all of the operations of the Significant Agent’s truck agent business. This principally consisted of the future revenue stream generated by independent agents, customers and owner-operators already under contract with and operating under our authorities and licenses, which were managed by the Significant Agent and for which the Significant Agent received 100% of the net revenue earned. The purchase price totaled approximately $10 million and principally consisted of an unconditional release and discharge of the Significant Agent from approximately $9.4 million of indebtedness due to the Company, plus the assumption of certain liabilities. See Note 4.

As a non-asset based provider of brokerage and contract carrier transportation services, the Company does not own any equipment and its services are provided through its strategic alliances with less than truckload, truckload, air, rail, ocean common carriers and independent owner-operators to service customers’ needs. The Company’s brokerage and contract carrier services are provided through a network of independent sales agents throughout the United States and Canada. During its most recently completed fiscal year, the Company generated revenue, income from operations and net income of approximately $278.2 million, $7.4 million and $4.4 million, respectively.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The financial statements of the Company have been prepared using the accrual basis of accounting under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP).

F-7

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the AutoInfo, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Sunteck Transport Group, Inc.,E-Transport Group, Inc. and Equipment Financial Solutions, Inc. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of these financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the periods presented. The Company believes that all such assumptions are reasonable and that all estimates are adequate, however, actual results could differ from those estimates.

Revenue Recognition

Gross revenues from transportation services consist of the total dollar value of services purchased by shippers. Net revenues are gross revenues less the direct costs of purchased transportation. Revenue is recognized upon delivery of freight, at which time the related transportation cost, including commission, is also recognized. At that time, the Company’s obligations are completed and collection of receivables is reasonably assured. Gross revenues and profits from agent support services consist primarily of interest on interest bearing loans.

Accounting Standards Codification Topic 605-45 “Revenue Recognition – Principal Agent Considerations” (ASC 605-45), establishes criteria for recognizing revenues on a gross or net basis. The Company is the primary obligor in its transactions, has all credit risk, maintains substantially all risk and rewards, has discretion in selecting the supplier, and has latitude in pricing decisions. Accordingly, the Company records all transactions at the gross amount, consistent with the provisions of ASC 605-45.

Income on all loans is recognized on the interest method. Accrual of interest is suspended at the earlier of the time at which collection becomes doubtful or the loan becomes delinquent. Interest income on impaired loans is recognized either as cash is collected or on a cost-recovery basis as conditions warrant.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash in banks.

Provision For Doubtful Accounts

The Company continuously monitors the creditworthiness of its customers and independent sales agents and has established an allowance for amounts that may become uncollectible in the future based on current economic trends, its historical payment and bad debt write-off experience, and any specific customer and independent sales agents related collection issues.

F-8

Fixed Assets

Fixed assets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, consisting predominantly of furniture, fixtures, equipment and proprietary software, are carried at cost net of accumulated depreciation. Depreciation of fixed assets is provided on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets which range from three to five years.

Sales-Type Leases

The Company provides lease financing primarily through sales-type leases. The Company records, at the inception of the lease, the aggregate future minimum lease payments, the estimated residual value of the leased equipment, and the related unearned income. Unearned income represents the difference between the sum of the future minimum lease payments receivable plus the estimated residual value less the sales price of the underlying equipment. Unearned income is recognized as revenue over the term of the related lease using the interest method. The equipment sale is recognized at the inception of the lease.

Intangible Assets

Goodwill represents the excess between the purchase price and the fair value of the net assets acquired. Goodwill is not amortized, but is tested at least annually for impairment using a fair value approach. Other intangible assets are primarily comprised of non-competition agreements which are being amortized on a straight-line basis of the estimated useful lives of five years. Amortization of $30,000 will be charged to operations annually through 2016.

Employee Benefit Plan

In 2008, the Company established a qualified 401(K) plan covering all employees meeting certain minimum requirements. Employees may contribute up to 5% of eligible compensation, as defined, and may make additional contributions subject to Internal Revenue Code limitations. The plan provided for matching contributions by the Company equal to 100% of the employees’ first 3% of elective deferrals and an additional 50% of the next 2% of elective deferrals, subject to a maximum contribution of 4% of an employees’ eligible compensation. In May 2009, the plan was modified eliminating matching contributions by the Company. In July 2011, the plan was modified reinstating matching contributions by the Company equal to ¼% for each 1% of the employees’ elective deferrals, subject to a maximum matching contribution of 1% of the employees’ eligible compensation. 401(K) expense charged to operations in 2012 and 2011 was $22,000 and $32,000, respectively.

Income Per Share

Basic income per share is based on net income divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Common stock equivalents outstanding were 1,878,000 and 1,488,000 for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

F-9

Income Taxes

The Company utilizes the asset and liability method for accounting for income taxes. Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

Generally, federal and state tax authorities may examine the Company’s tax returns three years from the date of filing. Accordingly, income tax returns for years prior to 2009 are no longer subject to examination by taxing authorities.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

There have been no new accounting standards made effective during the year ended December 31, 2012, or that are not yet effective, that have significance, or potential significance, to the consolidated financial statements.

Segment Information

The Company operates in two business segments, non-asset based transportation services and agent support services. The non-asset based transportation services segment includes our brokerage and contract carrier services which are provided through a network of independent sales agents throughout the United States and Canada. Revenue in this segment is generated from freight transportation transactions. The agent support services segment includes an array of services that we provide to our agent network to support and encourage the expansion of our agents’ businesses, primarily financial support through interest bearing long-term loans and non-interest bearing short-term loans, as well as other services including training, margin analysis, marketing assistance, industry and market segment data, and business analysis tools. Revenue in this segment consists primarily of interest earned on interest bearing loans and profits and interest earned on sales-type leases.

Reclassification

Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2011 consolidated financial statements in order to conform to the 2012 presentation. These reclassifications have no effect on previously reported net income.

Note 2 - Advances and Other Assets

Advances and other assets consists of the following:

|  | December 31, |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Signing bonuses to independent sales agents, amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the underlyingcontracts from three to ten years |  | $ | 2,320,000 |  |  | $ | 1,914,000 |
Non-interest bearing advances to independent salesagents repayable at the end of the underlying contracts at various dates through 2018 |  |  | 400,000 |  |  |  | 425,000 |
Loans to independent sales agents bearing interest at prime and prime plus 1%, repayable at various dates through 2021. |  |  | 2,482,000 |  |  |  | 2,031,000 |
Sales-type leases with original terms of 48 months, through 2016, net of unearned income of $374,000 at December 31, 2012. |  |  | 2,191,000 |  |  |  | 672,000 |
Due from independent sales agents and employees consisting of non-interest bearing loans, agent chargebacks, and advanced commissions expected to be earned / repaid through 2021 |  |  | 2,393,000 |  |  |  | 1,298,000 |
|  |  | 9,786,000 |  |  |  | 6,340,000 |
Less: allowance for uncollectible loans and advances |  |  | (350,000 | ) |  |  | (200,000 | )
|  |  | 9,436,000 |  |  |  | 6,140,000 |
Less: current portion |  |  | (3,666,000 | ) |  |  | (1,589,000 | )
|  | $ | 5,770,000 |  |  | $ | 4,551,000 |

F-10

Advances and other assets are expected to be earned / repaid as follows:

2013 |  | $ | 3,666,000 |
2014 |  |  | 1,279,000 |
2015 |  |  | 1,264,000 |
2016 |  |  | 922,000 |
2017 and beyond |  |  | 2,305,000 |
|  | $ | 9,436,000 |

Note 3 - Debt

Loan Payable

In February 2009, the Company entered into a $30.0 million line of credit with Regions Bank, secured by substantially all assets of the Company, which provided for interest at LIBOR plus 1 1/2% with a minimum of 3%, and the maintenance of certain financial covenants In April 2011, the line of credit was increased to $35 million, the maturity date was extended to June 2014, and the interest rate was modified to LIBOR plus from 1.75% to 2.25% based upon a debt to earnings ratio covenant, as defined. This rate was further reduced to LIBOR plus 1.75% in March 2012. At December 31, 2012, we had a balance outstanding of $13,025,000 pursuant to the line of credit at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.75% (1.962% as of December 31, 2012).

Note 4 - Acquisition

On July 8, 2011, the Company acquired substantially all of the operations of the Significant Agent’s truck agent business. This principally consisted of the future revenue stream generated by independent agents, customers and owner-operators already under contract with and operating under the authorities and licenses of the Company, which were managed by the Significant Agent and for which the Significant Agent received 100% of the net revenue earned. The purchase price totaled approximately $10 million and principally consisted of an unconditional release and discharge of the Significant Agent from approximately $9.4 million of indebtedness due to the Company plus the assumption of certain liabilities. Goodwill recognized in this transaction amounted to $9.8 million and other intangible assets, primarily non-competition agreements, amounted to $0.2 million. The increase in goodwill in 2012 of $96,000 resulted from the finalization of certain liabilities assumed in connection with the acquisition.

F-11

Prior to the acquisition, and since 2007, the Significant Agent was an independent agent to which the Company provided agent support services, including loans and advances. The Company received interest on the loans and advances extended to the Significant Agent at rates ranging from 8% to 20% and was entitled to receive a fee equal to 25% of the Significant Agent’s pre-tax income, if any. However, no pre-tax income was generated during the periods preceding July 2011. Pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement, all previous contractual arrangements between the Company and the Significant Agent were terminated, including the option to convert a portion of outstanding loans into a 25% equity ownership interest in the Significant Agent’s business. However, the Company agreed to continue to provide the Significant Agent with certain support services for its retained businesses through December 31, 2011 and entered into a brokerage agent agreement with the Significant Agent. In November 2011, the Significant Agent terminated its brokerage agent agreement with the Company simultaneously entering into a new credit facility. In connection with the termination of the brokerage agent agreement, the Company sold to the Significant Agent approximately $11 million of accounts receivable and the Significant Agent assumed approximately $6 million of related liabilities. The net proceeds of approximately $5 million were used by the Company to reduce the outstanding borrowings under its credit facility with Regions Bank.

The following pro forma consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2011 gives effect to the acquisition as of January 1, 2011:

AUTOINFO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011

|  | As previously reported |  |  | Pro Forma adjustments |  |  |  |  | Pro Forma |
Gross revenues |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Transportation services |  | $ | 318,080,000 |  |  | $ | (65,042,000 | ) |  | (g) |  | $ | 253,038,000 |
Agent support services |  |  | 1,890,000 |  |  |  | (986,000 | ) |  | (a) |  |  | 904,000 |
Total revenues |  |  | 319,970,000 |  |  |  | (66,028,000 | ) |  |  |  |  | 253,942,000 |
Purchased transportation |  |  | 259,493,000 |  |  |  | (56,451,000 | ) |  | (g) |  |  | 203,042,000 |
Purchased equipment for resale |  |  | 566,000 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 566,000 |
Commissions |  |  | 41,371,000 |  |  |  | (1,545,000 | ) |  | (b) |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  |  | (8,225,000 | ) |  | (g) |  |  | 31,601,000 |
Operating expenses |  |  | 12,108,000 |  |  |  | 532,000 |  |  | (c) (d) (e) |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  |  | (366,000 | ) |  | (g) |  |  | 12,274,000 |
|  |  | 313,538,000 |  |  |  | (66,055,000 | ) |  |  |  |  | 247,483,000 |
Income from operations |  |  | 6,432,000 |  |  |  | 27,000 |  |  |  |  |  | 6,459,000 |
Interest expense |  |  | 520,000 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 520,000 |
Income before income taxes |  |  | 5,912,000 |  |  |  | 27,000 |  |  |  |  |  | 5,939,000 |
Income taxes |  |  | 2,274,000 |  |  |  | 10,000 |  |  | (f) |  |  | 2,284,000
Net income |  | $ | 3,638,000 |  |  |  | 17,000 |  |  |  |  | $ | 3,655,000 |
Net income per share: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Basic |  | $ | .11 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | $ | .11 |
Diluted |  | $ | .10 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | $ | .10 |
Weighted average number of common shares: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Basic |  |  | 33,908,000 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 33,908,000 |
Diluted |  |  | 35,396,000 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 35,396,000 |

F-12

Footnotes to Pro Forma Statement of Income:

(a) Interest income on debt component of consideration discharged to acquire Truck Agent Business Unit.

(b) Commissions paid to the Significant Agent pursuant to Agent Agreement.

(c) $512,000 represents direct operating expenses, primarily payroll and related expenses, of Truck Agent Business Unit acquired.

(d) $5,000 represents an increase in management compensation based upon an increase in income from operations.

(e) $15,000 represents amortization of acquired identifiable intangible assets.

(f) Represent an increase in federal and state taxes on income.

(g) Represents the impact of the loss of the Significant Agent’s brokerage division business, as follows:

Revenues |  | $ | 65,042,000 |
Cost of transportation |  |  | 56,451,000 |
Commissions |  |  | 8,225,000 |
Operating expenses |  |  | 366,000 |

Note 5 - Income Taxes

For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the provision for income taxes consisted of the following:

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
|  | Current |  |  | Deferred |  |  | Current |  |  | Deferred |
Income tax expense |  | $ | 2,131,000 |  |  | $ | 608,000 |  |  | $ | 2,181,000 |  |  | $ | 93,000 |

The following table reconciles the Company's effective income tax rate on income before income taxes to the Federal statutory rate for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011:

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Federal statutory rate |  |  | 34.0 | % |  |  | 34.0 | %
State income taxes, net of federal benefit |  |  | 4.6 |  |  |  | 4.5 |
|  |  | 38.6 | % |  |  | 38.5 | %

F-13

Deferred taxes are comprised of the following at December 31, 2012 and 2011:

|  | December 31, |  |  | December 31, |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Deferred tax asset (liability) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Reserves and allowances |  | $ | 241,000 |  |  | $ | 241,000 |
Fixed assets |  |  | (354,000 | ) |  |  | (199,000 | )
Intangible assets |  |  | (333,000 | ) |  |  | - |
Other |  |  | (120,000 | ) |  |  | - |
Total net deferred tax asset (liability) |  | $ | (566,000 | ) |  | $ | 42,000 |

Note 6 - Commitments and Contingencies

Leases

The Company is obligated under non-cancelable operating leases for premises expiring through August 2016. Future minimum lease payments are $219,000, $230,000, $160,000, and $110,000 for the years ending December 31, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively. Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $273,000 and $232,000, respectively.

Other Agreements

The Company has employment agreements with Messrs. Wachtel, Wunderlich and Williams, its chief executive officer, chief financial officer, and it president and chief operating officer, respectively, who are also stockholders. In February 2011, Messrs. Wachtel, Wunderlich and Williams entered into new employment agreements. The agreements with Messrs. Wachtel and Wunderlich, which expire on December 31, 2015, provide for no change in the minimum annual compensation, bonus and maximum compensation. Bonus payments to each of Messrs. Wachtel and Wunderlich were $495,000 and $418,000 for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The agreement with Mr. Williams, which expires on December 31, 2015, provides for a minimum annual salary of $205,000 and an annual bonus equal to 2% of our first $3,000,000 of the Company’s consolidated pre-tax profit (as defined) plus an additional: (i) three percent (3%) of any of the Company’s consolidated pre-tax profit in excess of $3,000,000 but less than or equal to $4,000,000; (ii) four percent (4%) of any of the Company’s consolidated pre-tax profit in excess of $4,000,000 but less than or equal to $5,000,000; and (iii) five percent (5%) of any of the Company’s consolidated pre-tax profit in excess of $5,000,000; provided, however, the total annual aggregate salary and bonus payable to Mr. Williams is limited to a maximum of $485,000. Bonus payments to Mr. Williams were $280,000 and $236,000 for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The agreements also provide that in the event of a change in control (as defined therein), Messrs. Wachtel, Wunderlich and Williams shall each receive a lump-sum cash payment equal to one and one-half times the respective executive officer’s minimum annual compensation (as defined therein), plus one and one-half times of his average annual bonus for the prior two years. Further, upon a change in control, we may, within a specified period, terminate the executive officer’s employment with us without further liability to the executive officer other than with respect to the provision of continued medical coverage through December 31, 2015.

F-14

Litigation

The Company is involved in certain litigation arising in the ordinary course of its business. In the opinion of management, these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position or liquidity.

Note 7 - Stockholders' Equity

Stock Option Plans

The Company has seven stock option plans; its 1992, 1997, 1999, 2003, 2005 and two 2006 Plans (collectively, the Plans). Pursuant to the Plans, a total of 18,850,000 shares of common stock were made available for grant of stock options. Under the Plans, options have been granted to key personnel to purchase shares at not less than fair market value on the date of grant. Stock options generally vest ratably over a period of three to five years from the date of grant and must be exercised within ten years from the date of grant. The Company’s policy is to recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award. Compensation expense is recognized only for those options expected to vest, with forfeitures estimated at the date of grant based on the Company’s historical experience and future expectations. No further grants will be made under the 1992, 1997 or 1999 Plans.

Options have been granted under the Plans to independent sales agents under the same general terms and conditions as options granted to employees. Such option grants are primarily based upon profits generated and act as long-term incentives to remain with the Company. Out of the total options outstanding of 7,131,000 as of December 31, 2012, 2,513,000 have been granted to independent sales agents.

Option activity for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was as follows:

|  | Shares Subject to Options |  |  | Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share |  |  | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life |  |  | Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in millions) |
Outstanding, January 1, 2011 |  |  | 7,365,000 |  |  | $ | .67 |  |  |  | 2.1 |  |  | $ | - |
Forfeited / Expired |  |  | (392,000 | ) |  |  | .89 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Exercised |  |  | (1,362,000 | ) |  |  | .46 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Granted |  |  | 3,425,000 |  |  |  | .74 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Outstanding, December 31, 2011 |  |  | 9,036,000 |  |  | $ | .72 |  |  |  | 3.2 |  |  | $ | 1.4 |
Forfeited / Expired |  |  | (1,630,000 | ) |  |  | 1.08 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Exercised |  |  | (425,000 | ) |  |  | .46 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Granted |  |  | 150,000 |  |  |  | .88 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Outstanding December 31, 2012 |  |  | 7,131,000 |  |  | $ | .65 |  |  |  | 3.1 |  |  | $ | 2.0 |
Exercisable, December 31, 2012 |  |  | 3,402,000 |  |  | $ | .66 |  |  |  | 2.1 |  |  | $ | 1.0 |

F-15

As of December 31, 2012, there were 6,915,000 shares of common stock available for issuance pursuant to future stock option grants. Additional information regarding options outstanding as of December 31, 2012 is as follows:

|  |  | Options outstanding |  |  | Options exercisable |
Range of exercise prices |  |  | Shares |  |  | Weighted average remaining contractual life (years) |  |  | Weighted average exercise price |  |  | Shares |  |  | Weighted average exercise price |
$ | .05 - .20 |  |  |  | 108,000 |  |  |  | .4 |  |  | $ | .17 |  |  |  | 108,000 |  |  | $ | .17 |
| .24 - .65 |  |  |  | 2,739,000 |  |  |  | 2.5 |  |  |  | .41 |  |  |  | 1,650,000 |  |  |  | .39 |
| .67 - .88 |  |  |  | 3,750,000 |  |  |  | 4.0 |  |  |  | .77 |  |  |  | 1,110,000 |  |  |  | .86 |
| 1.00 – 1.48 |  |  |  | 534,000 |  |  |  | .1 |  |  |  | 1.16 |  |  |  | 534,000 |  |  |  | 1.16 |
$ | .05 – 1.48 |  |  |  | 7,131,000 |  |  |  | 3.1 |  |  | $ | .65 |  |  |  | 3,402,000 |  |  | $ | .66 |

Weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted: |  |  |

2012 |  | $ | .88 |
2011 |  | $ | .74 |

The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions by grant year.

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Risk-free interest rate |  |  | .5 | % |  |  | .5 | %
Expected dividend yield |  |  | 0 | % |  |  | 0 | %
Expected volatility factor |  |  | 15.90 | % |  |  | 15.10 | %
Expected option term, in years |  |  | 6.00 |  |  |  | 6.00 |

The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense related to stock options of $73,000 and $131,000 for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. As of December 31, 2012, the Company had $97,000 of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to non-vested stock option plans that will be recognized over a period of five years.

Note 8 - Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following disclosures of fair value were determined by management using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop estimated fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could realize on disposition of the financial instruments. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

Cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, advances and other assets, accounts payable and accrued liabilities and loan payable are carried at amounts which reasonably approximate fair value.

F-16

Note 9 - Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited)

|  | Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
|  | Quarter Ended |
|  | Mar 31 |  |  | June 30 |  |  | Sep 30 |  |  | Dec 31 |
Gross revenues: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Transportation services |  | $ | 61,497,000 |  |  | $ | 69,033,000 |  |  | $ | 70,596,000 |  |  | $ | 75,072,000 |
Agent support services |  |  | 303,000 |  |  |  | 164,000 |  |  |  | 1,260,000 |  |  |  | 246,000 |
|  | $ | 61,800,000 |  |  | $ | 69,197,000 |  |  | $ | 71,856,000 |  |  | $ | 75,318,000 |
Net income |  | $ | 831,000 |  |  | $ | 1,085,000 |  |  | $ | 1,390,000 |  |  | $ | 1,050,000 |
Basic net income per share |  | $ | .03 |  |  | $ | .03 |  |  | $ | .04 |  |  | $ | .03 |
Diluted net income per share |  | $ | .02 |  |  | $ | .03 |  |  | $ | .04 |  |  | $ | .03 |

|  | Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
|  | Quarter Ended |
|  | Mar 31 |  |  | June 30 |  |  | Sep 30 |  |  | Dec 31 |
Gross revenues: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Transportation services |  | $ | 74,944,000 |  |  | $ | 86,438,000 |  |  | $ | 85,262,000 |  |  | $ | 71,436,000 |
Agent support services |  |  | 535,000 |  |  |  | 527,000 |  |  |  | 97,000 |  |  |  | 731,000 |
|  | $ | 75,479,000 |  |  | $ | 86,965,000 |  |  | $ | 85,359,000 |  |  | $ | 72,167,000 |
Net income |  | $ | 661,000 |  |  | $ | 905,000 |  |  | $ | 944,000 |  |  | $ | 1,128,000 |
Basic net income per share |  | $ | .02 |  |  | $ | .03 |  |  | $ | .03 |  |  | $ | .03 |
Diluted net income per share |  | $ | .02 |  |  | $ | .03 |  |  | $ | .03 |  |  | $ | .02 |

Note 10 - Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information and Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities

Cash paid for interest in 2012 and 2011 was $323,000 and $520,000, respectively.

The Company paid income taxes of $1,469,000 and $1,125,000 for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

F-17

During 2011, the Company increased its $30.0 million line of credit from Regions Bank to $35 million.

In connection with the acquisition of the truck agent business division in July 2011, the Company acquired approximately $9.8 million of goodwill in exchange for indebtedness due to the Company of $9.4 million and the assumption of certain liabilities.

Note 11 - Segment Reporting

The Company operates in two business segments, non-asset based transportation services and agent support services. The non-asset based transportation services segment includes our brokerage and contract carrier services which are provided through a network of independent sales agents throughout the United States and Canada. Revenue in this segment is generated from freight transportation transactions. The agent support services segment includes an array of services that we provide to our agent network to support and encourage the expansion of our agents’ businesses, primarily financial support through interest bearing long-term loans, sales-type leases (which facilitate the acquisition of trucks by owner-operators), and non-interest bearing short-term loans, as well as other services including training, margin analysis, marketing assistance, industry and market segment data, and business analysis tools. Revenue in this segment consists primarily of interest on interest bearing loans and profits and interest on sales-type leases.

Our gross revenues, expenses, and total assets by segment as of and for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 are summarized below:

2012 |  | Transportation Services |  |  | Agent Support Services |  |  | Total |
Gross revenues |  | $ | 276,198,000 |  |  | $ | 1,973,000 |  |  | $ | 278,171,000 |
Purchased transportation |  |  | 221,366,000 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 221,366,000 |
Purchased equipment for resale |  |  | - |  |  |  | 1,178,000 |  |  |  | 1,178,000 |
Commissions |  |  | 34,379,000 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 34,379,000 |
Operating expenses |  |  | 13,514,000 |  |  |  | 316,000 |  |  |  | 13,830,000 |
Income from operations |  |  | 6,939,000 |  |  |  | 479,000 |  |  |  | 7,418,000 |
Interest expense |  |  | 323,000 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 323,000 |
Income taxes |  |  | 2,554,000 |  |  |  | 185,000 |  |  |  | 2,739,000 |
Net income |  | $ | 4,062,000 |  |  | $ | 294,000 |  |  | $ | 4,356,000 |
Assets |  | $ | 54,968,000 |  |  | $ | 9,436,000 |  |  | $ | 64,404,000 |

F-18

2011 |  | Transportation Services |  |  | Agent Support Services |  |  | Total |
Gross revenues |  | $ | 318,080,000 |  |  | $ | 1,890,000 |  |  | $ | 319,970,000 |
Purchased transportation |  |  | 259,493,000 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 259,493,000 |
Purchased equipment for resale |  |  | - |  |  |  | 566,000 |  |  |  | 566,000 |
Commissions |  |  | 41,371,000 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 41,371,000 |
Operating expenses |  |  | 11,837,000 |  |  |  | 271,000 |  |  |  | 12,108,000 |
Income from operations |  |  | 5,379,000 |  |  |  | 1,053,000 |  |  |  | 6,432,000 |
Interest expense |  |  | 520,000 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 520,000 |
Income taxes |  |  | 1,868,000 |  |  |  | 406,000 |  |  |  | 2,274,000 |
Net income |  | $ | 2,991,000 |  |  | $ | 647,000 |  |  | $ | 3,638,000 |
Assets |  | $ | 52,967,000 |  |  | $ | 6,140,000 |  |  | $ | 59,107,000 |

Our gross revenues and expenses as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011 presented on a Pro-Forma basis are summarized below:

2011 |  | Transportation Services |  |  | Agent Support Services |  |  | Total |
Gross revenues |  | $ | 253,038,000 |  |  | $ | 904,000 |  |  | $ | 253,942,000 |
Purchased transportation |  |  | 203,042,000 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 203,042,000 |
Purchased equipment for resale |  |  | - |  |  |  | 566,000 |  |  |  | 566,000 |
Commissions |  |  | 31,601,000 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 31,601,000 |
Operating expenses |  |  | 12,003,000 |  |  |  | 271,000 |  |  |  | 12,274,000 |
Income from operations |  |  | 6,392,000 |  |  |  | 67,000 |  |  |  | 6,459,000 |
Interest expense |  |  | 520,000 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 520,000 |
Income taxes |  |  | 2,261,000 |  |  |  | 23,000 |  |  |  | 2,284,000 |
Net income |  | $ | 3,611,000 |  |  | $ | 44,000 |  |  | $ | 3,655,000 |

Note 12 – Subsequent Event

Recent Developments – Entry into Merger Agreement for the Potential Sale of the Company

On February 28, 2013, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), by and among the Company, AutoInfo Holdings, LLC., a Delaware limited liability company (“Parent”), and AutoInfo Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (“Merger Sub”), pursuant to which Merger Sub shall be merged with and into the Company, and the separate corporate existence of Merger Sub shall thereupon cease, and the Company shall continue as the surviving corporation (the “Surviving Corporation”) and a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (the “Merger”). The Merger Agreement was unanimously approved by our Board of Directors (the “Board”), based on the recommendation of a Special Committee of the Board (the “Special Committee”) that was formed to evaluate and negotiate the terms of a sale of the Company.

F-19

At the time the Merger becomes effective pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement and under Delaware law (the “Effective Time”): (a) each share of capital stock of Merger Sub issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be converted into and become one validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable share of common stock of the Surviving Corporation, (b) each share of common stock of the Company issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (other than shares owned by the Company, Parent or Merger Sub, and shares owned by stockholders of the Company who have perfected and not withdrawn a demand for appraisal rights under Delaware law) will automatically be cancelled and converted into the right to receive $1.05 in cash, without interest (the “Merger Consideration”); and (c) each option outstanding (whether or not then vested or exercisable) that represents the right to acquire shares of common stock of the Company will be cancelled and terminated whereby the holder of any such options to acquire common stock of the Company shall receive an amount for each such option equal to the excess, if any, of (i) the Merger Consideration over (ii) the exercise price payable in respect of such share of common stock of the Company issuable upon exercise of such options.

The Merger Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and covenants. The consummation of the Merger is subject to customary conditions, including, without limitation, (a) approval by the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company entitled to vote on the Merger and (b) the absence of any law, order, injunction or other legal restraint prohibiting the Merger. Moreover, each party’s obligation to consummate the Merger is subject to certain other conditions, including, without limitation, (i) the accuracy of the other party’s representations and warranties (subject to customary qualifiers), (ii) the other party’s compliance with its covenants and agreements contained in the Merger Agreement (subject to customary qualifiers), (iii) certain required consents having been obtained, (iv) there not being any Company Material Adverse Effect (as defined in the Merger Agreement), and (v) there not being holders of more than 5% of the shares of common stock of the Company with respect to which appraisal rights have been properly exercised.

From the date of the Merger Agreement, the Company is subject to customary “no-shop” restrictions on its ability to solicit or respond to alternative takeover proposals from third parties, furnish information to and engage in discussions with third parties regarding alternative takeover proposals, recommend an alternative takeover proposal or enter into an agreement with respect to an alternative takeover proposal. The “no-shop” provision, however, is subject to a customary “fiduciary-out” provision, which provides that, at any point prior to the time stockholder approval is obtained, the Board may change its recommendation to the Company’s stockholders or enter into a definitive agreement with respect to an unsolicited, bona fide takeover proposal, if and only if, prior to taking such action, the Board has determined in good faith, after consultation with independent financial advisors and outside legal counsel, (a) that failure to take such action would violate the directors’ fiduciary duties to the Company’s stockholders under Delaware law and (b) that the Takeover Proposal (as defined in the Merger Agreement) constitutes a Superior Proposal(as defined in the Merger Agreement); provided, however, that (a) the Company has given Parent at least five (5) business days’ prior written notice of its intention to take such action and has provided a copy of the relevant proposed transaction agreements disclosing the party making such Takeover Proposal, (b) the Company has negotiated in good faith with Parent during such five (5) business day notice period (to the extent Parent wishes to negotiate) to enable Parent to revise the terms of the Merger Agreement such as to cause such Takeover Proposal to no longer constitute a Superior Proposal, (c) following the end of such five (5) business day notice period, the Board will have considered in good faith any changes to the Merger Agreement proposed in writing by Parent and will have determined that the Superior Proposal would continue to constitute a Superior Proposal if such revised terms offered by Parent were given effect, and (d) in the event of any changes to the terms of such Superior Proposal, the Company shall have delivered to Parent an additional notice and a new five (5) business day notice period.

The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights for the Company and Parent, including the right of the Company under certain circumstances to terminate the Merger Agreement to accept a Superior Proposal and enter into a definitive agreement with respect thereto. Upon termination of the Merger Agreement under specified circumstances, including termination of the Merger Agreement to accept a Superior Proposal and enter into a definitive agreement with respect thereto, the Company is required to pay Parent a termination fee of $1.5 million and reimburse Parent for out-of-pocket expenses actually incurred not to exceed $1.25 million. Upon termination of the Merger Agreement by the Company under certain specified circumstances, Parent and Merger Sub are required to pay the Company, a termination fee of $1.5 million.

F-20

The representations, warranties and covenants made in the Merger Agreement (a) have been made only for purposes of the Merger Agreement, (b) have been qualified by confidential disclosures made to Parent and Merger Sub in connection with the Merger Agreement, (c) are subject to materiality qualifications contained in the Merger Agreement which may differ from what may be viewed as material by investors, (d) were made only as of the date of the Merger Agreement or such other date as is specified in the Merger Agreement and (e) have been included in the Merger Agreement for the purpose of allocating risk between the contracting parties rather than establishing matters as facts. Accordingly, the Merger Agreement is included with this filing only to provide investors with information regarding the terms of the Merger Agreement, and not to provide investors with any other factual information regarding the Company or its business. Investors should not rely on the representations, warranties and covenants or any descriptions thereof as characterizations of the actual state of facts or condition of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries (as defined in the Merger Agreement) or Affiliates (as defined in the Merger Agreement). Moreover, information concerning the subject matter of the representations and warranties may change after the date of the Merger Agreement, which subsequent information may or may not be fully reflected in the Company’s public disclosures. The Merger Agreement should not be read alone, but should instead be read in conjunction with the other information regarding the Company that is or will be contained in, or incorporated by reference into, the Forms 10-K, Forms 10-Q and other documents that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

The foregoing descriptions of the Merger Agreement does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Merger Agreement, a copy of which is filed as Exhibit 2.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 5, 2013, and the terms of which are incorporated herein by reference.

The Board, acting upon the recommendation of the Special Committee, has approved the adoption of the Merger Agreement and consummation of the Merger and recommended adoption of the Merger Agreement and consummation of the Merger by our stockholders. The transactions contemplated under the Merger Agreement are expected to close in the second quarter of 2013.

As a condition to Parent entering into the Merger Agreement, on February 28, 2013, Peter C. Einselen, Mark K. Patterson, Thomas C. Robertson, Harry Wachtel, Mark Weiss, Michael P. Williams and William I. Wunderlich, in each case a stockholder and/or an option holder of the Company and members of our management and/or members of the Board, entered into a voting agreement with Parent (the “Voting Agreement”), whereby each voting stockholder party to the Voting Agreement agreed to vote all of the shares of common stock or options of the Company beneficially owned (or of record) by such voting stockholder, including, but not limited to, any shares of common stock or options of the Company that such voting stockholder has the right to vote due to any agreement, proxy or other similar right (i) in favor of adoption of the Merger Agreement and in favor of the Merger, (ii) against (A) any proposal made in opposition to adoption of the Merger Agreement or in competition or inconsistent with the Merger or any other Transaction (as defined in the Merger Agreement), (B) any Takeover Proposal, (C) any change in the Company’s management or the Board (other than as contemplated by the Merger Agreement), and (D) any action or agreement that the voting stockholders party to the Voting Agreement actually knows, or reasonably expects, would result in a breach of any representation, warranty, covenant or agreement or any other obligation of the Company under the Merger Agreement or of such voting stockholder party to the Voting Agreement. The voting stockholders parties to the Voting Agreement own approximately 22.3% of the voting power of shares entitled to vote on the Merger.

The foregoing description of the Voting Agreement does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Voting Agreement, a copy of which is filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 5, 2013, and the terms of which are incorporated herein by reference.

F-21