UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
| x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005
| ¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [NO FEE REQUIRED] |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 0-20646
Caraustar Industries, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| North Carolina | 58-1388387 | |
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) | |
| 5000 Austell Powder Springs Road, Suite 300, Austell, Georgia |
30106 | |
| (Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) | |
(770) 948-3101
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes x No ¨
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date, July 31, 2005.
| Common Stock, $.10 par value |
28,780,564 | |
| (Class) | (Outstanding) |
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2005
CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
ITEM 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands, except share data)
| June 30, 2005 |
December 31, 2004 |
|||||||
| ASSETS | ||||||||
| CURRENT ASSETS: |
||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 86,738 | $ | 89,756 | ||||
| Receivables, net of allowances for doubtful accounts, returns, and discounts of $3,880 and $4,418 as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively |
113,939 | 102,644 | ||||||
| Inventories |
89,636 | 89,044 | ||||||
| Refundable income taxes |
331 | 409 | ||||||
| Current deferred tax asset |
9,762 | 11,035 | ||||||
| Other current assets |
13,797 | 11,059 | ||||||
| Total current assets |
314,203 | 303,947 | ||||||
| PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT: |
||||||||
| Land |
11,818 | 11,856 | ||||||
| Buildings and improvements |
139,435 | 138,872 | ||||||
| Machinery and equipment |
627,948 | 616,791 | ||||||
| Furniture and fixtures |
16,552 | 15,725 | ||||||
| 795,753 | 783,244 | |||||||
| Less accumulated depreciation |
(409,093 | ) | (395,110 | ) | ||||
| Property, plant and equipment, net |
386,660 | 388,134 | ||||||
| GOODWILL |
183,130 | 183,130 | ||||||
| INVESTMENT IN UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES |
61,131 | 59,676 | ||||||
| OTHER ASSETS |
23,564 | 24,818 | ||||||
| $ | 968,688 | $ | 959,705 | |||||
| LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY | ||||||||
| CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
||||||||
| Current maturities of debt |
$ | 80 | $ | 80 | ||||
| Accounts payable |
87,624 | 84,890 | ||||||
| Accrued interest |
8,767 | 8,810 | ||||||
| Accrued compensation |
10,775 | 11,742 | ||||||
| Capital lease obligations |
522 | 79 | ||||||
| Pension liability |
13,392 | | ||||||
| Other accrued liabilities |
35,544 | 34,880 | ||||||
| Total current liabilities |
156,704 | 140,481 | ||||||
| SENIOR CREDIT FACILITY |
| | ||||||
| LONG-TERM DEBT, less current maturities |
503,362 | 506,141 | ||||||
| LONG-TERM CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS |
855 | | ||||||
| DEFERRED INCOME TAXES |
59,944 | 57,320 | ||||||
| PENSION LIABILITY |
24,444 | 32,897 | ||||||
| OTHER LIABILITIES |
5,296 | 5,614 | ||||||
| COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 13) |
||||||||
| SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY: |
||||||||
| Preferred stock, $.10 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued |
| | ||||||
| Common stock, $.10 par value; 60,000,000 shares authorized, 28,774,223 and 28,753,390 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively |
2,877 | 2,875 | ||||||
| Additional paid-in capital |
191,915 | 191,903 | ||||||
| Unearned compensation |
(3,872 | ) | (4,334 | ) | ||||
| Retained earnings |
49,120 | 48,552 | ||||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income: |
||||||||
| Minimum pension liability adjustment |
(22,621 | ) | (22,621 | ) | ||||
| Foreign currency translation |
664 | 877 | ||||||
| Total accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(21,957 | ) | (21,744 | ) | ||||
| Total Shareholders Equity |
218,083 | 217,252 | ||||||
| $ | 968,688 | $ | 959,705 | |||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands, except per share data)
| For the Three Months Ended June 30, |
For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
| 2005 |
2004 |
2005 |
2004 |
|||||||||||||
| SALES |
$ | 269,312 | $ | 268,471 | $ | 538,836 | $ | 525,566 | ||||||||
| COST OF SALES |
229,784 | 225,012 | 459,681 | 445,581 | ||||||||||||
| Gross profit |
39,528 | 43,459 | 79,155 | 79,985 | ||||||||||||
| SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES |
35,453 | 33,818 | 71,864 | 69,267 | ||||||||||||
| RESTRUCTURING AND IMPAIRMENT COSTS |
305 | 2,361 | 908 | 5,533 | ||||||||||||
| Income from operations |
3,770 | 7,280 | 6,383 | 5,185 | ||||||||||||
| OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME: |
||||||||||||||||
| Interest expense |
(10,425 | ) | (10,557 | ) | (21,102 | ) | (21,261 | ) | ||||||||
| Interest income |
554 | 160 | 1,063 | 347 | ||||||||||||
| Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates |
9,560 | 6,382 | 17,916 | 9,064 | ||||||||||||
| Other, net |
255 | (288 | ) | 346 | (319 | ) | ||||||||||
| (56 | ) | (4,303 | ) | (1,777 | ) | (12,169 | ) | |||||||||
| INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND MINORITY INTEREST |
3,714 | 2,977 | 4,606 | (6,984 | ) | |||||||||||
| (PROVISION) BENEFIT FOR INCOME TAXES |
(3,519 | ) | (1,285 | ) | (3,932 | ) | 2,067 | |||||||||
| MINORITY INTEREST IN (INCOME) LOSSES |
(81 | ) | 51 | (106 | ) | (113 | ) | |||||||||
| NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ | 114 | $ | 1,743 | $ | 568 | $ | (5,030 | ) | |||||||
| OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS: |
||||||||||||||||
| Foreign currency translation adjustment |
(95 | ) | (282 | ) | (213 | ) | (301 | ) | ||||||||
| COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) |
$ | 19 | $ | 1,461 | $ | 355 | $ | (5,331 | ) | |||||||
| BASIC |
||||||||||||||||
| NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE |
$ | 0.00 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.02 | $ | (0.18 | ) | |||||||
| WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING |
28,765 | 28,450 | 28,763 | 28,421 | ||||||||||||
| DILUTED |
||||||||||||||||
| NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE |
$ | 0.00 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.02 | $ | (0.18 | ) | |||||||
| WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING |
28,857 | 28,492 | 28,892 | 28,421 | ||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands)
| For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
||||||||
| 2005 |
2004 |
|||||||
| OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
| Net income (loss) |
$ | 568 | $ | (5,030 | ) | |||
| Depreciation and amortization |
14,127 | 14,265 | ||||||
| Stock-based compensation expense |
458 | | ||||||
| Gain on repurchase of debt |
(121 | ) | | |||||
| Restructuring and impairment costs |
249 | 2,013 | ||||||
| Deferred income taxes |
3,765 | (3,266 | ) | |||||
| Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates, net of distributions |
(1,416 | ) | (4,064 | ) | ||||
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities |
(8,539 | ) | (4,869 | ) | ||||
| Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
9,091 | (951 | ) | |||||
| INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
| Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
(11,551 | ) | (8,892 | ) | ||||
| Proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment |
1,105 | 2,011 | ||||||
| Investment in unconsolidated affiliates |
(40 | ) | (150 | ) | ||||
| Net cash used in investing activities |
(10,486 | ) | (7,031 | ) | ||||
| FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
| Repayments of long-term debt |
(2,413 | ) | (3,517 | ) | ||||
| Payments for capital lease obligations |
(234 | ) | (65 | ) | ||||
| Proceeds from swap agreement unwind |
826 | 380 | ||||||
| Issuances of stock, net of forfeitures |
198 | 1,886 | ||||||
| Net cash used in financing activities |
(1,623 | ) | (1,316 | ) | ||||
| NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
(3,018 | ) | (9,298 | ) | ||||
| CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
89,756 | 85,551 | ||||||
| CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD |
$ | 86,738 | $ | 76,253 | ||||
| SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES: |
||||||||
| Cash payments for interest |
$ | 23,075 | $ | 22,154 | ||||
| Income tax payments, net of refunds |
$ | 274 | $ | 1,136 | ||||
| Property acquired under capital leases |
$ | 1,532 | $ | | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2005
(UNAUDITED)
Note 1. Basis of Presentation
The financial information included herein is unaudited; however, such information reflects all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of June 30, 2005, and the results of operations for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 and the cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The results of operations for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 and the cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 are not, and should not be, construed as necessarily indicative of the results of the operations or cash flows which may be reported for the remainder of 2005.
The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for reporting on Form 10-Q. Pursuant to such rules and regulations, certain footnote disclosures and other information normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted. These unaudited condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. The accounting policies followed for interim financial reporting are the same as those disclosed in Note 1 of the notes to the financial statements included in the Companys Form 10-K.
Note 2. New Accounting Pronouncements
On April 14, 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced that the required effective date for adopting Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123 (R), Share-Based Payment has been deferred to fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005 instead of an effective date beginning July 1, 2005. The Company will be required to adopt this statement January 1, 2006.
Note 3. Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
The Company has elected to follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and related interpretations (APB No. 25) in accounting for its employee stock options. However, pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per share is required by SFAS No. 148, Accounting For Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure which requires that the information be determined as if the Company has accounted for its employee stock options granted under the fair value method of that statement. The fair values of the options granted during 2004 were estimated as of the grant dates using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:
| Risk-free interest rate |
3.88% 4.31 | % | |
| Expected dividend yield |
0 | % | |
| Expected option lives |
8-10 years | ||
| Expected volatility |
40 | % |
The total fair value of the options granted during the year ended December 31, 2004 was computed to be approximately $2.3 million. No options were granted during the six-month period ended June 30, 2005. One thousand options with an approximate
6
value of $4 thousand were granted during the six-month period ended June 30, 2004. If the Company had accounted for these plans in accordance with SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation and included the amortization expense related to options vesting each year, the Companys reported and pro forma net income (loss) and net income (loss) per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 would have been as follows (in thousands, except per share data):
| Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
| 2005 |
2004 |
2005 |
2004 |
|||||||||||||
| Net income (loss): |
||||||||||||||||
| As reported |
$ | 114 | $ | 1,743 | $ | 568 | $ | (5,030 | ) | |||||||
| Incremental stock based compensation expense determined pursuant to SFAS No. 123, net of related tax effects |
(255 | ) | (137 | ) | (614 | ) | (837 | ) | ||||||||
| Pro forma net (loss) income |
$ | (141 | ) | $ | 1,606 | $ | (46 | ) | $ | (5,867 | ) | |||||
| Diluted income (loss) per common share: |
||||||||||||||||
| As reported |
$ | 0.00 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.02 | $ | (0.18 | ) | |||||||
| Pro forma |
0.00 | 0.06 | 0.00 | (0.21 | ) | |||||||||||
Note 4. Inventory
Inventories are carried at the lower of cost or market. The costs included in inventory include raw materials (recovered fiber for paperboard products and paperboard for converted products), direct and indirect labor and employee benefits, energy and fuel, depreciation, chemicals, general manufacturing overhead and various other costs of manufacturing. General and administrative costs are not included in inventory costs.
Market, with respect to all inventories, is replacement cost or net realizable value. The Company reviews inventory at least quarterly to determine the necessity of write-offs for excess, obsolete or unsaleable inventory. The Company estimates reserves for inventory obsolescence and shrinkage based on managements judgment of future realization. These reviews require management to assess customer and market demand. All inventories are valued using the first-in, first-out method.
Inventories at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, were as follows (in thousands):
| June 30, 2005 |
December 31, 2004 | |||||
| Raw materials and supplies |
$ | 40,220 | $ | 40,094 | ||
| Finished goods and work in process |
49,416 | 48,950 | ||||
| Total inventory |
$ | 89,636 | $ | 89,044 | ||
Note 5. Senior Credit Facility and Long-Term Debt
At June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, total long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
| June 30, 2005 |
December 31, 2004 |
|||||||
| Senior credit facility |
$ | | $ | | ||||
| 9 7/8 % senior subordinated notes |
262,500 | 265,000 | ||||||
| 7 3/8 % senior notes |
189,750 | 189,750 | ||||||
| 7 1/4 % senior notes |
29,000 | 29,000 | ||||||
| Other notes payable |
9,735 | 9,735 | ||||||
| Net premiums (1) |
12,457 | 12,736 | ||||||
| Total debt |
503,442 | 506,221 | ||||||
| Less current maturities |
(80 | ) | (80 | ) | ||||
| Total long-term debt |
$ | 503,362 | $ | 506,141 | ||||
| (1) | These amounts consist of realized interest rate swap gains less the original issuance discounts and accumulated discount amortization related to the senior and senior subordinated notes. As described below under Interest Rate Swap Agreements, realized gains resulting from unwinding interest rate swaps are recorded as a component of debt and will be accreted as a reduction to interest expense over the remaining term of the debt. |
7
Senior Credit Facility
The Companys senior credit facility provides for a revolving line of credit of $75.0 million and is secured primarily by a first priority security interest in the Companys accounts receivable and inventory. The facility includes a subfacility of $50.0 million for letters of credit, usage of which reduces availability under the facility. As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, no borrowings were outstanding under the facility; however, an aggregate of $37.9 million and $38.4 million in letter of credit obligations were outstanding, respectively. Availability under the facility at June 30, 2005 was limited to $37.1 million after taking into consideration outstanding letter of credit obligations.
Effective March 1, 2005 the Company amended its senior credit facility to increase the aggregate amount of permitted asset sales from $5.0 million to $15.0 million, to reduce the unused facility fee from 0.50% to 0.375%, and to reduce the applicable interest margins above the Base Rate and LIBOR Rate for borrowings and outstanding letters of credit under the facility. The interest margin for Base Rate borrowings was reduced from 0.50% to a range from (0.25%) to 0.25%, and the margin for LIBOR Rate borrowings and outstanding letters of credit was reduced from 2.50% to a range from 1.50% to 2.00%, with the applicable margin to be set based on the Companys levels of available cash. At June 30, 2005, the applicable interest margin for Base Rate borrowings was (0.25%) and the applicable interest margin for LIBOR Rate borrowings was 1.50%.
Senior and Senior Subordinated Notes
On June 1, 1999, the Company issued $200.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 7 3/8% senior notes due June 1, 2009. The 7 3/8% senior notes were issued at a discount to yield an effective interest rate of 7.47% and pay interest semiannually. After taking into account realized gains from unwinding various interest rate swap agreements, the current effective interest rate of the 7 3/8% senior notes is 6.3%. The 7 3/8% senior notes are unsecured obligations of the Company. During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company purchased an aggregate of $10.3 million of these notes in the open market.
On March 29, 2001, the Company issued $285.0 million of 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes due April 1, 2011 and $29.0 million of 7 1/4% senior notes due May 1, 2010. These senior subordinated notes and senior notes were issued at a discount to yield effective interest rates of 10.5% and 9.4%, respectively. After taking into account realized gains from unwinding various interest rate swap agreements, the current effective interest rate of the 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes is 9.2%. These publicly traded senior subordinated and senior notes are unsecured, but are guaranteed, on a joint and several basis, by all but one of the Companys wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries. The Company purchased $20.0 million of the 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes during the year ended December 31, 2004. During May 2005, the Company purchased $2.5 million of the 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes in the open market. The Companys board of directors has authorized purchases of up to an additional $10.0 million of the 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes as market conditions warrant; however, purchases of senior notes or senior subordinated notes may be limited by the terms of the Companys senior credit facility.
Interest Rate Swap Agreements
From time to time, the Company has entered into interest rate swap agreements related to its senior notes and its senior subordinated notes. The payment and expiration date for these interest rate swaps correspond to the terms of the note obligations they cover. These interest rate swap agreements effectively convert an amount of the Companys fixed debt into variable rate obligations. Typically, the variable amounts are based upon a three-month or six-month LIBOR plus a fixed margin. When the Company has unwound these agreements and recognized a gain, the amount is classified as a component of debt and is accreted to interest expense over the remaining life of the notes.
In March 2004, the Company unwound a $50.0 million interest rate swap agreement related to the 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes and received approximately $380 thousand from the bank counter party. The $380 thousand gain was classified as a component of debt, and is being accreted over the remaining life of the notes and will partially offset the increase in interest expense.
In April 2004, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement in the notional amount of $50.0 million. This agreement effectively converted $50.0 million of the Companys fixed rate 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes into variable rate obligations. The variable rates were based on six-month LIBOR plus a fixed margin.
In March 2005, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement in the notional amount of $50.0 million. This agreement effectively converted $50.0 million of the Companys fixed rate 7 3/8% senior notes into variable rate obligations. The variable rates were based on three-month LIBOR plus a fixed margin.
In June 2005, the Company unwound the March 2005 $50.0 million interest rate swap agreement related to the 7 3/8% senior notes and received approximately $826 thousand from the bank counter party. The $826 thousand gain was classified as a component of debt, and is being accreted over the remaining life of the notes and will partially offset the increase in interest expense.
8
Under the provisions of SFAS No. 133 Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended, the Company has designated and accounted for its interest rate swap agreements as fair value hedges. The Company has assumed no ineffectiveness with regard to these agreements as they qualified for the short-cut method of accounting for fair value hedges of debt obligations, as prescribed by SFAS No. 133.
Note 6. Segment Information
The Company operates principally in four business segments organized by products. The paperboard segment consists of facilities that manufacture 100% recycled uncoated and clay-coated paperboard. The recovered fiber segment consists of facilities that collect and sell recycled paper and broker recycled paper and other paper rolls. The tube, core, and composite container segment is principally made up of facilities that produce spiral and convolute-wound tubes, cores, and composite cans. The carton and custom packaging segment consists of facilities that produce printed and unprinted folding cartons and set-up boxes and facilities that provide contract manufacturing and contract packaging services. Intersegment sales are recorded at prices which approximate market prices.
Operating results include all costs and expenses directly related to the segment involved. Corporate expenses include corporate, general, administrative and unallocated information systems expenses.
The following table presents certain business segment information for the periods indicated (in thousands):
| Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
| 2005 |
2004 |
2005 |
2004 |
|||||||||||||
| Sales (external customers): |
||||||||||||||||
| Paperboard |
$ | 68,703 | $ | 72,609 | $ | 137,693 | $ | 143,115 | ||||||||
| Recovered fiber |
20,424 | 20,838 | 41,594 | 38,191 | ||||||||||||
| Tube, core, and composite container |
100,971 | 99,139 | 200,757 | 193,362 | ||||||||||||
| Carton and custom packaging |
79,214 | 75,885 | 158,792 | 150,898 | ||||||||||||
| Total |
$ | 269,312 | $ | 268,471 | $ | 538,836 | $ | 525,566 | ||||||||
| Sales (intersegment): |
||||||||||||||||
| Paperboard |
$ | 46,090 | $ | 46,284 | $ | 96,997 | $ | 90,396 | ||||||||
| Recovered fiber |
20,611 | 13,896 | 37,607 | 28,341 | ||||||||||||
| Tube, core, and composite container |
1,507 | 236 | 2,626 | 2,389 | ||||||||||||
| Carton and custom packaging |
320 | 145 | 529 | 536 | ||||||||||||
| Total |
$ | 68,528 | $ | 60,561 | $ | 137,759 | $ | 121,662 | ||||||||
| Income (loss) from operations: |
||||||||||||||||
| Paperboard (A) |
$ | 5,666 | $ | 6,651 | $ | 11,916 | $ | 10,694 | ||||||||
| Recovered fiber (B) |
(67 | ) | 579 | 768 | 1,356 | |||||||||||
| Tube, core, and composite container (C) |
2,739 | 4,547 | 3,276 | 7,826 | ||||||||||||
| Carton and custom packaging (D) |
1,903 | 473 | 3,403 | (4,063 | ) | |||||||||||
| 10,241 | 12,250 | 19,363 | 15,813 | |||||||||||||
| Corporate expense (E) |
(6,471 | ) | (4,970 | ) | (12,980 | ) | (10,628 | ) | ||||||||
| Income from operations |
3,770 | 7,280 | 6,383 | 5,185 | ||||||||||||
| Interest expense |
(10,425 | ) | (10,557 | ) | (21,102 | ) | (21,261 | ) | ||||||||
| Interest income |
554 | 160 | 1,063 | 347 | ||||||||||||
| Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates |
9,560 | 6,382 | 17,916 | 9,064 | ||||||||||||
| Other, net |
255 | (288 | ) | 346 | (319 | ) | ||||||||||
| Income (loss) before income taxes and minority interest |
$ | 3,714 | $ | 2,977 | $ | 4,606 | $ | (6,984 | ) | |||||||
| (A) | Results for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 include charges to operations of $69 thousand and $612 thousand, respectively, for restructuring and impairment costs. Results for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 include charges to operations of $32 thousand and $1.9 million respectively, for restructuring and impairment costs. These costs relate to closing and consolidating operations within the paperboard segment. |
| (B) | Results for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 include credits to operations of $69 thousand and charges to operations of $26 thousand respectively, for restructuring and impairment costs. Results for the six-month periods ended |
9
June 30, 2005 and 2004 include credits to operations of $64 thousand and charges to operations of $31 thousand respectively, for restructuring and impairment costs. These costs relate to closing and consolidating operations within the recovered fiber segment.
| (C) | Results for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 include credits to operations of $19 thousand and charges to operations of $162 thousand, respectively, for restructuring and impairment costs. Results for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 include charges to operations of $105 and $222 thousand respectively, for restructuring and impairment costs. These costs relate primarily to the disposition of machinery and equipment within the tube, core and composite segment. |
| (D) | Results for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 include charges to operations of $337 thousand and $771 thousand, respectively, for restructuring and impairment costs. Results for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 include charges to operations of $806 and $1.7 million respectively, for restructuring and impairment costs. These costs relate to closing and consolidating operations within the carton and custom packaging segment. |
| (E) | Results for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 include credits to operations of $13 thousand and charges to operations of $790 thousand, respectively, for centralizing the accounting and finance operations. Results for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 include charges to operations of $29 thousand and $1.6 million respectively, for centralizing the accounting and finance operations. |
Note 7. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill
The Company accounts for goodwill and other intangible assets pursuant to SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Under this pronouncement the Company performs an impairment test at least annually. The Companys most recent impairment test was performed during the fourth quarter of 2004 and did not result in an impairment charge. There were no changes in goodwill during the six months ended June 30, 2005.
Intangible Assets
As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively, the Company had an intangible asset of $7.0 million, net of $1.6 million of accumulated amortization, and $7.2 million, net of $1.4 million of accumulated amortization which is classified with other assets. Amortization expense was $284 thousand for each six month period ended June 30, 2005 and 2004. The intangible asset is associated with the acquisition of certain assets of the Smurfit Industrial Packaging Group, which was completed in 2002, and is attributable to the acquired customer relationships. This intangible asset is being amortized over 15 years. Scheduled amortization of the intangible asset for the next five years is as follows (in thousands):
| 2006 |
$ | 568 | |
| 2007 |
568 | ||
| 2008 |
568 | ||
| 2009 |
568 | ||
| 2010 |
568 | ||
| Five year total |
$ | 2,840 | |
Note 8. Restructuring and Impairment Costs
Restructuring has been a primary component of managements strategy to address the decrease in industry demand and excess capacity. In response to these issues the Company has closed and consolidated seven facilities within its paperboard segment and four facilities within its carton and custom packaging segment. These initiatives are designed to enhance the Companys competitiveness through reduced costs, reduction of geographic overlap, duplicative capabilities, and differentiated quality products and services to the Companys customers.
In addition to the Companys restructuring initiatives for its operations, the Company implemented a plan to centralize its accounting and finance operations to its headquarters located in Austell, Georgia. This action was initiated to enhance the accounting control environment and mitigate the cost of complying with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
10
In June 2005, the Company announced the permanent closure of its Palmer carton plant located in Thorndike, Massachusetts. In the second quarter of 2005 the Company recorded a charge of approximately $200 thousand for severance and other benefits in connection with this closure. The Company expects to incur an additional $328 thousand of severance and other benefit expense and $408 thousand in other exit costs related to the closure of this facility. The Palmer carton plant ceased operations in mid July in order to facilitate customer transition to the Companys other carton operations.
The following is a summary of restructuring and impairment costs and the restructuring liability from December 31, 2004 to June 30, 2005 (in thousands):
| Asset Impairment Charges and Loss on Disposals |
Severance and Other Termination Benefits Costs |
Other Exit Costs |
Restructuring Liability Total |
Total (1) | ||||||||||||||
| Liability balance, December 31, 2004 |
$ | 3,716 | $ | 2,750 | $ | 6,466 | ||||||||||||
| First quarter 2005 costs |
$ | 183 | | 420 | 420 | $ | 603 | |||||||||||
| Expenditures |
(791 | ) | (887 | ) | (1,678 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Liability balance, March 31, 2005 |
$ | 2,925 | $ | 2,283 | $ | 5,208 | ||||||||||||
| Second quarter 2005 costs |
$ | 66 | 90 | 149 | 239 | $ | 305 | |||||||||||
| Expenditures |
(351 | ) | (470 | ) | (821 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Liability balance, June 30, 2005 |
$ | 2,664 | $ | 1,962 | $ | 4,626 | ||||||||||||
| (1) | Asset impairment charges and loss on disposals, severance and other termination benefit costs and other exit costs are aggregated and reported as restructuring and impairment costs on the statement of operations. |
The following table summarizes restructuring and impairment costs by segment for those plans initiated since January 1, 2003 and accounted for under SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (in thousands):
| Segment |
Cumulative Costs as of December 31, 2004 (1) |
Costs for the Six months Ended June 30, 2005 (2) |
Estimated Costs to Complete Initiatives as of June 30, 2005 |
Total Estimated June 30, 2005 | |||||||||
| Paperboard |
$ | 15,103 | $ | | $ | | $ | 15,103 | |||||
| Recovered fiber |
1,023 | (59 | ) | | 964 | ||||||||
| Carton and custom packaging |
12,349 | 732 | 1,090 | 14,171 | |||||||||
| Tube, core and composite container |
528 | (38 | ) | 110 | 600 | ||||||||
| Corporate |
1,945 | 29 | | 1,974 | |||||||||
| Total |
$ | 30,948 | $ | 664 | $ | 1,200 | $ | 32,812 | |||||
| (1) | Of the total $30.9 million in cumulative restructuring costs, $22.6 million were non-cash charges. |
| (2) | The total costs incurred during the six months ended June 30, 2005, $664 thousand, does not agree with the six month total of $908 thousand from table above, since some of the costs are related to plans initiated prior to January 1, 2003 and are not subject to the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 146. |
9. Pension Plan and Other Postretirement Benefits
Pension Plan and Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
Substantially all of the Companys employees participate in a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan (the Pension Plan). The Pension Plan calls for benefits to be paid to all eligible employees at retirement based primarily on years of service with the Company and compensation rates in effect near retirement. The Pension Plans assets consist of shares held in collective investment funds, mutual funds, a portfolio of hedge funds and a derivative fund. The Companys policy is to fund benefits attributed to employees service to date, as well as service expected to be earned in the future. Based on current estimates, we plan to make a $13.4 million contribution in September 2005.
11
Certain executives participate in a supplemental executive retirement plan (SERP), which provides retirement benefits to participants based on average compensation. The SERP is unfunded at June 30, 2005.
Pension expense for the Pension Plan and the SERP includes the following components for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 (in thousands):
| Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
| 2005 |
2004 |
2005 |
2004 |
|||||||||||||
| Service cost of benefits earned |
$ | 863 | $ | 1,483 | $ | 1,725 | $ | 2,966 | ||||||||
| Interest cost on projected benefit obligation |
2,035 | 1,509 | 4,070 | 3,017 | ||||||||||||
| Estimated return on plan assets |
(1,740 | ) | (1,595 | ) | (3,480 | ) | (3,190 | ) | ||||||||
| Net amortization and deferral |
1,667 | 881 | 3,335 | 1,762 | ||||||||||||
| Net pension expense |
$ | 2,825 | $ | 2,278 | $ | 5,650 | $ | 4,555 | ||||||||
Other Postretirement Benefits
The Company provides postretirement medical benefits to retired employees of certain of its subsidiaries. The Company accounts for these postretirement medical benefits in accordance with SFAS No. 106, Employers Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions.
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 included the following components (in thousands):
| Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
| 2005 |
2004 |
2005 |
2004 | |||||||||
| Service cost of benefits earned |
$ | 8 | $ | 5 | $ | 15 | $ | 9 | ||||
| Interest cost on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation |
78 | 83 | 157 | 166 | ||||||||
| Amortization |
17 | 70 | 33 | 141 | ||||||||
| Net postretirement benefit cost |
$ | 103 | $ | 158 | $ | 205 | $ | 316 | ||||
Note 10. Income (Loss) Per Share
The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted income (loss) per share computations for net income (loss) (in thousands, except per share information):
| Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
||||||||||||
| 2005 |
2004 |
2005 |
2004 |
||||||||||
| Net income (loss) |
$ | 114 | $ | 1,743 | $ | 568 | $ | (5,030 | ) | ||||
| Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic |
28,765 | 28,450 | 28,763 | 28,421 | |||||||||
| Common share equivalents |
92 | 42 | 129 | | |||||||||
| Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - diluted |
28,857 | 28,492 | 28,892 | 28,421 | |||||||||
| Income (loss) per share - basic |
$ | 0.00 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.02 | $ | (0.18 | ) | ||||
| Income (loss) per share - diluted |
$ | 0.00 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.02 | $ | (0.18 | ) | ||||
The impact of the dilutive effect of the stock options has been included in the three months ended June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004 and the six months ended June 30, 2005; however, since the six months ended June 30, 2004 was a net loss, the impact of
12
the dilutive effect of stock options, if any, was not added to the weighted average shares for this period. The number of antidilutive options not included in the computation of diluted weighted average shares for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 were 1,092,743 and 1,006,597, respectively.
Note 11. Equity Interests in Unconsolidated Affiliates
The Company owns 50% of Standard Gypsum, L.P. (Standard). Standard is a joint venture, accounted for under the equity method, that operates two gypsum wallboard manufacturing facilities. One facility is located in McQueeny, Texas and the other is in Cumberland City, Tennessee. The joint venture is managed by Temple-Inland, Inc., which is the owner of the remaining 50% interest in the joint venture. Because of the significance of Standards operating results to the Company, Standards summarized balance sheets and income statements are presented below (in thousands):
| June 30, 2005 * |
December 31, 2004 * | |||||
| Current assets |
$ | 34,222 | $ | 27,995 | ||
| Noncurrent assets |
61,669 | 61,968 | ||||
| Current liabilities |
12,763 | 11,631 | ||||
| Current debt |
56,200 | 56,200 | ||||
| Net assets |
26,928 | 22,132 | ||||
| Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
| 2005 |
2004 |
2005 |
2004 | |||||||||
| Sales |
$ | 50,303 | $ | 44,432 | $ | 95,465 | $ | 77,434 | ||||
| Gross profit |
17,078 | 13,044 | 32,763 | 21,196 | ||||||||
| Income from operations |
16,345 | 11,836 | 30,113 | 19,004 | ||||||||
| Net income |
$ | 14,790 | $ | 11,112 | $ | 27,796 | $ | 18,042 | ||||
| * | The actual dates of Standards financial statements are July 2, 2005 and January 1, 2005 for the periods ending June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. |
The Company received $11.5 million and $5.0 million in cash distributions from Standard during the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The Companys equity interest in the earnings of Standard for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004, were approximately $7.4 million and $5.6 million in earnings, respectively. The Companys equity interest in the earnings of Standard for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004, were approximately $13.9 million and $9.0 million, respectively.
The Company owns 50% of Premier Boxboard Limited (PBL). PBL is a joint venture with Temple-Inland, Inc., which owns the remaining 50% interest, and is accounted for under the equity method. PBL produces lightweight gypsum facing paper, along with containerboard grades, and is managed by the Company. Because of the significance of PBLs operating results to the Company, PBLs summarized balance sheets and income statements are presented below (in thousands):
| June 30, 2005 |
December 31, 2004 | |||||
| Current assets |
$ | 20,797 | $ | 20,845 | ||
| Noncurrent assets |
138,222 | 140,434 | ||||
| Current liabilities |
13,739 | 13,676 | ||||
| Long-term liabilities |
295 | 698 | ||||
| Long-term debt |
50,000 | 50,000 | ||||
| Net assets |
94,985 | 96,905 | ||||
| Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
||||||||||||
| 2005 |
2004 |
2005 |
2004 |
||||||||||
| Sales |
$ | 32,893 | $ | 27,290 | $ | 62,339 | $ | 49,459 | |||||
| Gross profit |
7,350 | 4,619 | 15,141 | 5,967 | |||||||||
| Income from operations |
5,354 | 2,615 | 10,119 | 2,029 | |||||||||
| Net income (loss) |
$ | 4,341 | $ | 1,529 | $ | 8,079 | $ | (148 | ) | ||||
13
The Company received $5.0 million in cash distributions from PBL for the six months ended June 30, 2005, and no distributions for the six months ended June 30, 2004. The Companys equity interest in the earnings from PBL for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004, were approximately $2.2 million in earnings and $764 thousand, respectively. The Companys equity interest in the earnings or loss from PBL for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004, were approximately $4.0 million in earnings and $25 thousand, respectively.
As of December 31, 2004, PBL was the borrower under a credit facility with an aggregate outstanding principal amount of $632 thousand, consisting solely of an undrawn letter of credit. On January 5, 2005, Premier Boxboards revolving credit facility expired. The only outstanding obligation under the facility at the time of expiration was the $632 thousand letter of credit balance, which expired on June 20, 2005 and was not renewed. Premier Boxboard placed $614 thousand of available cash into a trust account to replace the expired letter of credit.
Note 12. Guarantor Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements
These condensed consolidating financial statements reflect Caraustar Industries, Inc. and its Subsidiary Guarantors, which consist of all but one of the Companys wholly-owned subsidiaries other than foreign subsidiaries. These nonguarantor subsidiaries are herein referred to as Nonguarantor Subsidiaries. Separate financial statements of the Subsidiary Guarantors are not presented because the subsidiary guarantees are joint and several and full and unconditional and the Company believes that the condensed consolidating financial statements presented are more meaningful in understanding the financial position of the Subsidiary Guarantors.
14
CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
| As of June 30, 2005 |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Parent |
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Nonguarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations |
Consolidated |
||||||||||||||||
| ASSETS | ||||||||||||||||||||
| CURRENT ASSETS: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 85,325 | $ | 156 | $ | 1,257 | $ | | $ | 86,738 | ||||||||||
| Intercompany funding |
(82,093 | ) | 96,133 | (14,040 | ) | | | |||||||||||||
| Receivables, net of allowances |
| 108,394 | 5,545 | | 113,939 | |||||||||||||||
| Intercompany accounts receivable |
| 246 | 255 | (501 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
| Inventories |
| 85,915 | 3,721 | | 89,636 | |||||||||||||||
| Refundable income taxes |
331 | | | | 331 | |||||||||||||||
| Current deferred tax asset |
9,762 | | | | 9,762 | |||||||||||||||
| Other current assets |
7,251 | 4,402 | 2,144 | | 13,797 | |||||||||||||||
| Total current assets |
20,576 | 295,246 | (1,118 | ) | (501 | ) | 314,203 | |||||||||||||
| PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT |
18,160 | 751,666 | 25,927 | | 795,753 | |||||||||||||||
| Less accumulated depreciation |
(10,049 | ) | (385,666 | ) | (13,378 | ) | | (409,093 | ) | |||||||||||
| Property, plant, and equipment, net |
8,111 | 366,000 | 12,549 | | 386,660 | |||||||||||||||
| GOODWILL |
| 179,628 | 3,502 | | 183,130 | |||||||||||||||
| INVESTMENT IN CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES |
572,865 | 131,669 | | (704,534 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
| INVESTMENT IN UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES |
61,131 | | | | 61,131 | |||||||||||||||
| OTHER ASSETS |
15,387 | 8,059 | 118 | | 23,564 | |||||||||||||||
| $ | 678,070 | $ | 980,602 | $ | 15,051 | $ | (705,035 | ) | $ | 968,688 | ||||||||||
| LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY | ||||||||||||||||||||
| CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Current maturities of debt |
$ | 80 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 80 | ||||||||||
| Accounts payable |
20,382 | 62,791 | 4,451 | | 87,624 | |||||||||||||||
| Intercompany accounts payable |
| 255 | 246 | (501 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
| Accrued interest |
8,633 | 134 | | | 8,767 | |||||||||||||||
| Accrued compensation |
1,180 | 9,437 | 158 | | 10,775 | |||||||||||||||
| Capital lease obligations |
504 | 18 | | | 522 | |||||||||||||||
| Pension liability |
13,392 | | | | 13,392 | |||||||||||||||
| Other accrued liabilities |
2,484 | 31,495 | 1,565 | | 35,544 | |||||||||||||||
| Total current liabilities |
46,655 | 104,130 | 6,420 | (501 | ) | 156,704 | ||||||||||||||
| SENIOR CREDIT FACILITY |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
| LONG-TERM DEBT, less current maturities |
495,162 | 8,200 | | | 503,362 | |||||||||||||||
| LONG-TERM CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS |
809 | 46 | | | 855 | |||||||||||||||
| DEFERRED INCOME TAXES |
46,238 | 12,240 | 1,466 | | 59,944 | |||||||||||||||
| PENSION LIABILITY |
24,444 | | | | 24,444 | |||||||||||||||
| OTHER LIABILITIES |
1,009 | 3,493 | | 794 | 5,296 | |||||||||||||||
| SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Common stock |
2,763 | 772 | 523 | (1,181 | ) | 2,877 | ||||||||||||||
| Additional paid-in capital |
197,067 | 671,229 | 9,167 | (685,548 | ) | 191,915 | ||||||||||||||
| Unearned compensation |
(3,872 | ) | | | | (3,872 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Retained (deficit) earnings |
(109,584 | ) | 180,492 | (3,189 | ) | (18,599 | ) | 49,120 | ||||||||||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income |
(22,621 | ) | | 664 | | (21,957 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Total Shareholders Equity |
63,753 | 852,493 | 7,165 | (705,328 | ) | 218,083 | ||||||||||||||
| $ | 678,070 | $ | 980,602 | $ | 15,051 | $ | (705,035 | ) | $ | 968,688 | ||||||||||
15
CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
| As of December 31, 2004 |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Parent |
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Nonguarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations |
Consolidated |
||||||||||||||||
| ASSETS | ||||||||||||||||||||
| CURRENT ASSETS: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 88,998 | $ | 125 | $ | 633 | $ | | $ | 89,756 | ||||||||||
| Intercompany funding |
(65,837 | ) | 79,577 | (13,740 | ) | | | |||||||||||||
| Receivables, net of allowances |
| 96,933 | 5,711 | | 102,644 | |||||||||||||||
| Intercompany accounts receivable |
| 175 | 272 | (447 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
| Inventories |
| 84,808 | 4,236 | | 89,044 | |||||||||||||||
| Refundable income taxes |
409 | | | | 409 | |||||||||||||||
| Current deferred tax asset |
11,035 | | | | 11,035 | |||||||||||||||
| Other current assets |
4,502 | 5,094 | 1,463 | | 11,059 | |||||||||||||||
| Total current assets |
39,107 | 266,712 | (1,425 | ) | (447 | ) | 303,947 | |||||||||||||
| PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT |
14,169 | 743,218 | 25,857 | | 783,244 | |||||||||||||||
| Less accumulated depreciation |
(9,140 | ) | (373,279 | ) | (12,691 | ) | | (395,110 | ) | |||||||||||
| Property, plant, and equipment, net |
5,029 | 369,939 | 13,166 | | 388,134 | |||||||||||||||
| GOODWILL |
| 179,628 | 3,502 | | 183,130 | |||||||||||||||
| INVESTMENT IN CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES |
572,865 | 131,669 | | (704,534 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
| INVESTMENT IN UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES |
59,676 | | | | 59,676 | |||||||||||||||
| OTHER ASSETS |
16,138 | 8,564 | 116 | | 24,818 | |||||||||||||||
| $ | 692,815 | $ | 956,512 | $ | 15,359 | $ | (704,981 | ) | $ | 959,705 | ||||||||||
| LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY | ||||||||||||||||||||
| CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Current maturities of debt |
$ | 80 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 80 | ||||||||||
| Accounts payable |
20,352 | 59,880 | 4,658 | | 84,890 | |||||||||||||||
| Intercompany accounts payable |
| 272 | 175 | (447 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
| Accrued interest |
8,743 | 67 | | | 8,810 | |||||||||||||||
| Accrued compensation |
2,002 | 9,583 | 157 | | 11,742 | |||||||||||||||
| Capital lease obligation |
79 | | | | 79 | |||||||||||||||
| Other accrued liabilities |
4,030 | 29,970 | 880 | | 34,880 | |||||||||||||||
| Total current liabilities |
35,286 | 99,772 | 5,870 | (447 | ) | 140,481 | ||||||||||||||
| SENIOR CREDIT FACILITY |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
| LONG-TERM DEBT, less current maturities |
497,941 | 8,200 | | | 506,141 | |||||||||||||||
| DEFERRED INCOME TAXES |
43,599 | 12,240 | 1,481 | | 57,320 | |||||||||||||||
| PENSION LIABILITY |
32,897 | | | | 32,897 | |||||||||||||||
| OTHER LIABILITIES |
1,080 | 3,846 | | 688 | 5,614 | |||||||||||||||
| SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Common stock |
2,761 | 772 | 523 | (1,181 | ) | 2,875 | ||||||||||||||
| Additional paid-in capital |
197,055 | 671,229 | 9,167 | (685,548 | ) | 191,903 | ||||||||||||||
| Unearned compensation |
(4,334 | ) | | | | (4,334 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Retained (deficit) earnings |
(90,849 | ) | 160,453 | (2,559 | ) | (18,493 | ) | 48,552 | ||||||||||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income |
(22,621 | ) | | 877 | | (21,744 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Total Shareholders Equity |
82,012 | 832,454 | 8,008 | (705,222 | ) | 217,252 | ||||||||||||||
| $ | 692,815 | $ | 956,512 | $ | 15,359 | $ | (704,981 | ) | $ | 959,705 | ||||||||||
16
CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands)
| For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Parent |
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Nonguarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations |
Consolidated |
||||||||||||||||
| SALES |
$ | | $ | 330,733 | $ | 11,453 | $ | (72,874 | ) | $ | 269,312 | |||||||||
| COST OF SALES |
| 291,956 | 10,702 | (72,874 | ) | 229,784 | ||||||||||||||
| Gross profit |
| 38,777 | 751 | | 39,528 | |||||||||||||||
| SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES |
6,505 | 28,014 | 934 | | 35,453 | |||||||||||||||
| RESTRUCTURING AND IMPAIRMENT COSTS |
(13 | ) | 318 | | | 305 | ||||||||||||||
| (Loss) income from operations |
(6,492 | ) | 10,445 | (183 | ) | | 3,770 | |||||||||||||
| OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest expense |
(10,333 | ) | (91 | ) | (1 | ) | | (10,425 | ) | |||||||||||
| Interest income |
554 | | | | 554 | |||||||||||||||
| Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates |
9,560 | | | | 9,560 | |||||||||||||||
| Other, net |
121 | 106 | 28 | | 255 | |||||||||||||||
| (98 | ) | 15 | 27 | | (56 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| (LOSS) INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND MINORITY INTEREST |
(6,590 | ) | 10,460 | (156 | ) | | 3,714 | |||||||||||||
| PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES |
(3,519 | ) | | | | (3,519 | ) | |||||||||||||
| MINORITY INTEREST IN INCOME |
| | | (81 | ) | (81 | ) | |||||||||||||
| NET (LOSS) INCOME |
$ | (10,109 | ) | $ | 10,460 | $ | (156 | ) | $ | (81 | ) | $ | 114 | |||||||
17
CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands)
| For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2004 |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Parent |
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Nonguarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations |
Consolidated |
||||||||||||||||
| SALES |
$ | | $ | 327,364 | $ | 9,889 | $ | (68,782 | ) | $ | 268,471 | |||||||||
| COST OF SALES |
| 285,164 | 8,630 | (68,782 | ) | 225,012 | ||||||||||||||
| Gross profit |
| 42,200 | 1,259 | | 43,459 | |||||||||||||||
| SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES |
4,119 | 28,087 | 1,612 | | 33,818 | |||||||||||||||
| RESTRUCTURING AND IMPAIRMENT COSTS |
791 | 1,578 | (8 | ) | | 2,361 | ||||||||||||||
| (Loss) income from operations |
(4,910 | ) | 12,535 | (345 | ) | | 7,280 | |||||||||||||
| OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest expense |
(10,476 | ) | (79 | ) | (101 | ) | 99 | (10,557 | ) | |||||||||||
| Interest income |
259 | | | (99 | ) | 160 | ||||||||||||||
| Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates |
6,382 | | | | 6,382 | |||||||||||||||
| Other, net |
(349 | ) | 117 | (56 | ) | | (288 | ) | ||||||||||||
| (4,184 | ) | 38 | (157 | ) | | (4,303 | ) | |||||||||||||
| (LOSS) INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND MINORITY INTEREST |
(9,094 | ) | 12,573 | (502 | ) | | 2,977 | |||||||||||||
| PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES |
(1,285 | ) | | | | (1,285 | ) | |||||||||||||
| MINORITY INTEREST IN LOSSES |
| | | 51 | 51 | |||||||||||||||
| NET (LOSS) INCOME |
$ | (10,379 | ) | $ | 12,573 | $ | (502 | ) | $ | 51 | $ | 1,743 | ||||||||
18
CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands)
| For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Parent |
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Nonguarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations |
Consolidated |
||||||||||||||||
| SALES |
$ | | $ | 664,701 | $ | 22,197 | $ | (148,062 | ) | $ | 538,836 | |||||||||
| COST OF SALES |
| 586,786 | 20,957 | (148,062 | ) | 459,681 | ||||||||||||||
| Gross profit |
| 77,915 | 1,240 | | 79,155 | |||||||||||||||
| SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES |
12,950 | 56,999 | 1,915 | | 71,864 | |||||||||||||||
| RESTRUCTURING AND IMPAIRMENT COSTS |
29 | 879 | | | 908 | |||||||||||||||
| (Loss) income from operations |
(12,979 | ) | 20,037 | (675 | ) | | 6,383 | |||||||||||||
| OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest expense |
(20,923 | ) | (178 | ) | (1 | ) | | (21,102 | ) | |||||||||||
| Interest income |
1,062 | 1 | | | 1,063 | |||||||||||||||
| Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates |
17,916 | | | | 17,916 | |||||||||||||||
| Other, net |
121 | 179 | 46 | | 346 | |||||||||||||||
| (1,824 | ) | 2 | 45 | | (1,777 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| (LOSS) INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND MINORITY INTEREST |
(14,803 | ) | 20,039 | (630 | ) | | 4,606 | |||||||||||||
| PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES |
(3,932 | ) | | | | (3,932 | ) | |||||||||||||
| MINORITY INTEREST IN INCOME |
| | | (106 | ) | (106 | ) | |||||||||||||
| NET (LOSS) INCOME |
$ | (18,735 | ) | $ | 20,039 | $ | (630 | ) | $ | (106 | ) | $ | 568 | |||||||
19
CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands)
| For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Parent |
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Nonguarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations |
Consolidated |
||||||||||||||||
| SALES |
$ | | $ | 641,154 | $ | 19,457 | $ | (135,045 | ) | $ | 525,566 | |||||||||
| COST OF SALES |
| 563,561 | 17,065 | (135,045 | ) | 445,581 | ||||||||||||||
| Gross profit |
| 77,593 | 2,392 | | 79,985 | |||||||||||||||
| SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES |
9,034 | 57,401 | 2,832 | | 69,267 | |||||||||||||||
| RESTRUCTURING AND IMPAIRMENT COSTS |
1,591 | 3,942 | | | 5,533 | |||||||||||||||
| (Loss) income from operations |
(10,625 | ) | 16,250 | (440 | ) | | 5,185 | |||||||||||||
| OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest expense |
(21,099 | ) | (160 | ) | (202 | ) | 200 | (21,261 | ) | |||||||||||
| Interest income |
547 | | | (200 | ) | 347 | ||||||||||||||
| Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates |
9,064 | | | | 9,064 | |||||||||||||||
| Other, net |
(396 | ) | 168 | (91 | ) | | (319 | ) | ||||||||||||
| (11,884 | ) | 8 | (293 | ) | | (12,169 | ) | |||||||||||||
| (LOSS) INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND MINORITY INTEREST |
(22,509 | ) | 16,258 | (733 | ) | | (6,984 | ) | ||||||||||||
| BENEFIT FOR INCOME TAXES |
2,067 | | | | 2,067 | |||||||||||||||
| MINORITY INTEREST IN INCOME |
| | | (113 | ) | (113 | ) | |||||||||||||
| NET (LOSS) INCOME |
$ | (20,442 | ) | $ | 16,258 | $ | (733 | ) | $ | (113 | ) | $ | (5,030 | ) | ||||||
20
CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
| For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||
| Parent |
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Nonguarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations |
Consolidated |
|||||||||||||||
| Net cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 593 | $ | 7,673 | $ | 825 | $ | | $ | 9,091 | |||||||||
| Investing activities: |
|||||||||||||||||||
| Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
(2,607 | ) | (8,743 | ) | (201 | ) | | (11,551 | ) | ||||||||||
| Proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment |
| 1,105 | | | 1,105 | ||||||||||||||
| Investment in unconsolidated affiliates |
(40 | ) | | | | (40 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Net cash used in investing activities |
(2,647 | ) | (7,638 | ) | (201 | ) | | (10,486 | ) | ||||||||||
| Financing activities: |
|||||||||||||||||||
| Repayments of short and long-term debt |
(2,413 | ) | | | | (2,413 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Payments for capital lease obligations |
(230 | ) | (4 | ) | | | (234 | ) | |||||||||||
| Proceeds from swap agreement unwind |
826 | | | | 826 | ||||||||||||||
| Issuances of stock, net of forfeitures |
198 | | | | 198 | ||||||||||||||
| Net cash used in financing activities |
(1,619 | ) | (4 | ) | | | (1,623 | ) | |||||||||||
| Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
(3,673 | ) | 31 | 624 | | (3,018 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
88,998 | 125 | 633 | | 89,756 | ||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 85,325 | $ | 156 | $ | 1,257 | $ | | $ | 86,738 | |||||||||
21
CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
| For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 |
|||||||||||||||||||
| Parent |
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Nonguarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations |
Consolidated |
|||||||||||||||
| Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
$ | (6,486 | ) | $ | 5,948 | $ | (413 | ) | $ | | $ | (951 | ) | ||||||
| Investing activities: |
|||||||||||||||||||
| Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
(625 | ) | (7,768 | ) | (499 | ) | | (8,892 | ) | ||||||||||
| Proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment |
| 1,962 | 49 | | 2,011 | ||||||||||||||
| Investment in unconsolidated affiliates |
(150 | ) | | | | (150 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Net cash used in investing activities |
(775 | ) | (5,806 | ) | (450 | ) | | (7,031 | ) | ||||||||||
| Financing activities: |
|||||||||||||||||||
| Repayments of short and long-term debt |
(3,500 | ) | (17 | ) | | | (3,517 | ) | |||||||||||
| Payments for capital lease obligations |
(65 | ) | | | | (65 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Proceeds from swap agreement unwind |
380 | | | | 380 | ||||||||||||||
| Issuances of stock, net of forfeitures |
1,886 | | | | 1,886 | ||||||||||||||
| Net cash used in financing activities |
(1,299 | ) | (17 | ) | | | (1,316 | ) | |||||||||||
| Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
(8,560 | ) | 125 | (863 | ) | | (9,298 | ) | |||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
84,303 | | 1,248 | | 85,551 | ||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 75,743 | $ | 125 | $ | 385 | $ | | $ | 76,253 | |||||||||
22
Note 13. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company previously reported that its Sprague facility received a proposed consent order from the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (CTDEP) alleging the facility had exceeded the visible emissions standards in the second and third quarters of 2004 and the sulfur dioxide emissions standard for the first quarter of 2003. The Company resolved this matter with the CTDEP during the second quarter of 2005. The Sprague facility accepted a civil penalty, including corrective action and fines totaling approximately $182 thousand. In response to this matter, the Company previously implemented, and continues to monitor, operational changes that management believes will enable the Company to comply prospectively with these visible emissions and sulfur dioxide standards.
23
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following is managements discussion and analysis of certain significant factors that have affected our financial condition and operating results during the periods included in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.
General
We are a major manufacturer of recycled paperboard and converted paperboard products. We operate in four business segments. The paperboard segment manufactures 100% recycled uncoated and clay-coated paperboard. The recovered fiber segment collects and sells recycled paper and brokers recycled paper and other paper rolls. The tube, core and composite container segment produces spiral and convolute-wound tubes, cores and cans. The carton and custom packaging segment produces printed and unprinted folding carton and set-up boxes and provides contract manufacturing and packaging services.
Our business is vertically integrated to a large extent. This means that our converting operations consume a large portion of our own paperboard production, approximately 44% in the first six months of 2005. The remaining 56% of our paperboard production is sold to external customers in any of the four recycled paperboard end-use markets: tube, core and composite containers; folding cartons; gypsum wallboard facing paper and other specialty products. These integration statistics do not include volume produced or converted by our 50% owned, unconsolidated, joint ventures, Premier Boxboard Limited and Standard Gypsum, LLP. As part of our strategy to optimize our operating efficiency, each of our mills can produce recycled paperboard for more than one end-use market. This allows us to shift production among mills in response to customer or market demands.
Historically, we have grown our business, revenues and production capacity to a significant degree through acquisitions. Based on the difficult operating climate for our industry and our financial position over the last three years, the pace of our acquisition activity, and correspondingly, our revenue growth, has slowed as we have focused on conserving cash and maximizing the productivity of our existing facilities.
We are a holding company that operates our business through 25 subsidiaries as of June 30, 2005. We also own a 50% interest in two joint ventures with Temple-Inland, Inc. We have two additional joint ventures with unrelated entities in which our investment and share of earnings are immaterial. We account for these interests in our joint ventures under the equity method of accounting. See Liquidity and Capital Resources Off - Balance Sheet Arrangements Joint Venture Financings below.
Key Business Indicator and Trends
Our industry has historically been closely correlated with the domestic economy in general, and with consumer nondurable consumption (packaging segment) and industrial production (tube, core and composite containers segment), specifically. These demand drivers tend to be cyclical in nature, with cycles lasting 3 5 years depending on such factors as gross domestic product, interest rates and other factors. As these demand drivers fluctuate, we typically experience variability in volume and revenue in our business. From late 1999 through 2002, the recycled paperboard and converted paperboard products industry was in a down cycle. While we believe that future operating results may improve, and improvements have been realized in 2004 and to a lesser extent for the six months ended June 30, 2005, we cannot ascertain either the timing or extent of any such improvement, in light of its dependence on these demand drivers and other factors, such as changes in key operating costs like fiber and energy.
A key operating indicator of our business is paperboard mill operating rates. Mill operating rates are calculated as the ratio of production compared with capacity assuming a normalized mill schedule of 355 days per year. As paperboard mill operating rates increase, cost per ton of paperboard generally decreases. As these tons are sold, profitability increases, since fixed production costs are absorbed by more tons produced. Additionally, higher operating rates generally provide enhanced opportunity to recover material, energy and labor increases through improved pricing. This positively affects paperboard and converted products income from operations and cash flow. Paperboard mill operating rates are affected by demand and by mill closures. Industry demand decreased from 2000 2002 due primarily to a recessionary general economy, the continued migration of U.S. manufacturing offshore to lower labor cost environments and product substitution, such as the replacement of carton packaging with plastic standup pouches. The decrease in demand resulted in a decrease in operating rates for us and the
24
industry as a whole. We expect the migration of U.S. manufacturing offshore and product substitution to continue, although at a slower rate, which could continue to negatively affect our income from operations and cash flow. We further expect these trends to be somewhat offset by the improving domestic economy and our own paperboard mill capacity reductions. Recent industry improvement in operating rates has been driven by paperboard mill closures, as over 1.7 million tons of capacity, or approximately 20% of the recycled paperboard mill total capacity, has been closed from 2001 through 2004. We have closed or idled approximately 323 thousand tons of our own paperboard mill capacity during this period to better match our supply capabilities to demand. The chart below shows a ten year history of operating rates for both Caraustar and the industry, as well as rates for the six months ending June 30, 2005:
MILL OPERATING RATES
| (1) | For the six months ended June 30, 2005 |
Industry source: American Forest and Paper Association.
Restructuring has been a primary component of managements strategy to address the decrease in demand resulting from secular trends, as discussed above, and generally weak domestic economic conditions. Between 2001 and June 30, 2005, restructuring charges have totaled $57.9 million, of which approximately $34.4 million have been noncash charges. We have also experienced increases in near-term manufacturing and selling, general and administrative costs as a result of our transitioning of business within our mill and converting systems to other company facilities. Our strategic initiatives are designed to enhance our competitiveness through reduced costs, increase revenue through delivery of differentiated quality products and services to our customers, and promote compliance with recent changes in legal and regulatory requirements. Our restructuring efforts have been directed toward reducing costs through manufacturing and converting facilities rationalization where we believed it was advantageous to do so due to geographic overlap, duplicative capabilities, changes in customer base and other factors. Rationalization of facilities typically results in initially increased cash outlays and expenses, such as severance costs. We expect that restructuring charges will continue to decline and we believe that future earnings and cash flows will be favorably affected by our efforts to reconfigure our business to increase efficiency and better match supply with customer demand. However, should market conditions deteriorate, additional restructuring charges are possible.
Recovered fiber, which is derived from recycled paper stock, is our most significant raw material. Historically, the cost of recovered fiber has fluctuated significantly due to market and industry conditions. For example, our average recovered fiber cost per ton of paperboard produced increased $26 per ton, or 33%, from 1999 to 2000, decreased $39 per ton, or 38%, from 2000 to 2001 and then increased again $20 per ton, or 31%, from 2001 to 2002. Recovered fiber cost per ton averaged $107 during 2004 and $109 during the first six months of 2005.
Excluding raw materials and labor, energy is our most significant manufacturing cost. Energy consists of fuel used to generate steam used in the paper making process and electrical purchases to operate our paperboard machines and all of our converting machinery. During the first six months of 2005, energy costs were $65 per ton compared with $56 per ton in the first six months of 2004, a 16.1% increase. The increase was due primarily to an increase in natural gas costs. Oil prices also affect our raw material costs because we use petroleum-based coatings, chemicals and resins in some of our products. Until the last few years,
25
our business had not been significantly affected by energy cost increases, and we historically have not passed increases in energy costs through to our customers. As the volatility of energy prices has increased, we have not been able to pass through to our customers all of the energy cost increases we have incurred. As a result, our operating margins have been adversely affected. Although we continue to evaluate our energy costs and consider ways to factor energy costs into our pricing, we cannot give assurance that our operating margins and results of operations will not continue to be adversely affected by rising energy costs.
We raise our selling prices in response to increases in raw material and energy costs. However, we often are unable to pass the full amount of these costs through to our customers on a timely basis due to supply and demand in the industry, and as a result often cannot maintain our operating margins in the face of rapid cost increases. We experience margin shrinkage during all periods of cost increases due to customary time lags in implementing our price increases. We cannot give assurance that we will be able to recover any future increases in the cost of recovered fiber or energy by raising the prices of our products. Even if we are able to recover future cost increases, our operating margins and results of operations may still be materially and adversely affected by time delays in the implementation of price increases.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which require management to make estimates that affect the amounts of revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities reported. The critical accounting matters that are very important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and require some of managements most difficult, subjective and complex judgments are described in detail in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. The accounting for these matters involves forming estimates based on current facts, circumstances and assumptions which, in managements judgment, could change in a manner that would materially affect managements future estimates with respect to such matters and, accordingly, could cause future reported financial condition and results of operations to differ materially from financial results reported based on managements current estimates. There have been no material changes in our critical accounting policies during the six-month period ended June 30, 2005.
Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
The following table shows paperboard shipment volume, average selling price per ton, average recovered fiber cost per ton for the paperboard mills, and average paperboard cost per ton for the tube and core operations for the periods indicated. The average selling price and average cost per ton, are presented below because management believes they are the most significant indicators of profitability for the paperboard segment and the tube, core and composite container segment. Historically, recovered fiber has been our largest raw material cost component and has fluctuated significantly due to market and industry conditions. However, these drivers are not the only factors that can affect these segments. Also, note that a portion of our sales do not have related paperboard volume, such as sales of contract packaging services and sales of recovered fiber. The volume information shown below includes shipments of unconverted paperboard and converted paperboard products. Tonnage volumes from our business segments, excluding tonnage produced or converted by our unconsolidated joint ventures, are combined and presented along end-use market lines.
26
| Three Months Ended June 30, |
Change |
% Change |
||||||||||
| 2005 |
2004 |
|||||||||||
| Paperboard tons shipped by production source (in thousands): |
||||||||||||
| From internal paperboard mill production |
240.0 | 248.3 | (8.3 | ) | (3.3 | )% | ||||||
| Purchases from external sources |
30.3 | 34.9 | (4.6 | ) | (13.2 | )% | ||||||
| Total paperboard tonnage |
270.3 | 283.2 | (12.9 | ) | (4.6 | )% | ||||||
| Paperboard tons shipped by end-use market (in thousands): |
||||||||||||
| Tube, core and composite container volume |
||||||||||||
| Paperboard (internal) |
60.6 | 63.1 | (2.5 | ) | (4.0 | )% | ||||||
| Purchases from external sources |
11.0 | 11.2 | (0.2 | ) | (1.8 | )% | ||||||
| Tube, core and composite container converted products |
71.6 | 74.3 | (2.7 | ) | (3.6 | )% | ||||||
| Unconverted paperboard shipped to external customers |
12.1 | 11.5 | 0.6 | 5.2 | % | |||||||
| Tube, core and composite container volume |
83.7 | 85.8 | (2.1 | ) | (2.4 | )% | ||||||
| Folding carton volume |
||||||||||||
| Paperboard (internal) |
22.4 | 24.0 | (1.6 | ) | (6.7 | )% | ||||||
| Purchases from external sources |
16.8 | 20.4 | (3.6 | ) | (17.6 | )% | ||||||
| Folding carton converted products |
39.2 | 44.4 | (5.2 | ) | (11.7 | )% | ||||||
| Unconverted paperboard shipped to external customers |
59.9 | 55.9 | 4.0 | 7.2 | % | |||||||
| Folding carton volume |
99.1 | 100.3 | (1.2 | ) | (1.2 | )% | ||||||
| Gypsum wallboard facing paper volume |
||||||||||||
| Unconverted paperboard shipped to external customers |
15.7 | 26.1 | (10.4 | ) | (39.8 | )% | ||||||
| Other specialty products volume |
||||||||||||
| Paperboard (internal) |
23.5 | 20.8 | 2.7 | 13.0 | % | |||||||
| Purchases from external sources |
2.5 | 3.3 | (0.8 | ) | (24.2 | )% | ||||||
| Other specialty converted products |
26.0 | 24.1 | 1.9 | 7.9 | % | |||||||
| Unconverted paperboard shipped to external customers |
45.8 | 46.9 | (1.1 | ) | (2.3 | )% | ||||||
| Other specialty products volume |
71.8 | 71.0 | 0.8 | 1.1 | % | |||||||
| Total paperboard tonnage |
270.3 | 283.2 | (12.9 | ) | (4.6 | )% | ||||||
| Selling price and cost data ($/ton): |
||||||||||||
| Paperboard mills: |
||||||||||||
| Average selling price |
$ | 471 | $ | 449 | 22 | 4.9 | % | |||||
| Average recovered fiber cost |
107 | 111 | (4 | ) | (3.6 | )% | ||||||
| Tube and core facilities: |
||||||||||||
| Average selling price |
$ | 947 | $ | 891 | 56 | 6.3 | % | |||||
| Average paperboard cost |
491 | 468 | 23 | 4.9 | % | |||||||
The following table shows paperboard shipment volume on our business segment basis (in thousands of tons).
| Three Months Ended June 30, |
Change |
% Change |
||||||||
| 2005 |
2004 |
|||||||||
| Paperboard |
||||||||||
| Unconverted paperboard shipped to external customers |
133.4 | 140.4 | (7.0 | ) | (5.0 | )% | ||||
| Paperboard shipped internally to converters in the paperboard segment |
15.8 | 14.0 | 1.8 | 12.9 | % | |||||
| Paperboard purchased externally by converters in the paperboard segment |
0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | % | |||||
| Total volume |
149.4 | 154.6 | (5.2 | ) | (3.4 | )% | ||||
| Tube, core and composite container |
||||||||||
| Paperboard (internal) |
68.4 | 69.9 | (1.5 | ) | (2.1 | )% | ||||
| Purchases from external sources |
13.3 | 14.3 | (1.0 | ) | (7.0 | )% | ||||
| Total volume converted |
81.7 | 84.2 | (2.5 | ) | (3.0 | )% | ||||
| Carton and custom packaging |
||||||||||
| Paperboard (internal) |
22.4 | 24.0 | (1.6 | ) | (6.7 | )% | ||||
| Purchases from external sources |
16.8 | 20.4 | (3.6 | ) | (17.6 | )% | ||||
| Total volume converted |
39.2 | 44.4 | (5.2 | ) | (11.7 | )% | ||||
| Total paperboard tonnage |
270.3 | 283.2 | (12.9 | ) | (4.6 | )% | ||||
Paperboard Tonnage. Total paperboard tonnage for the three months ended June 30, 2005, decreased 4.6% to 270.3 thousand tons from 283.2 thousand tons for the same period in 2004. Tons sold from paperboard mill production decreased 3.3% to 240.0 thousand tons for the three months ended June 30, 2005, compared to the same period in 2004. Total tonnage converted decreased 4.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2005.
27
Total paperboard tonnage decreased primarily due to a decrease in gypsum facing paper sales resulting from downtime and inefficiencies associated with an equipment upgrade at our Sweetwater paperboard mill. The volume lost at Sweetwater mill was assumed by our 50% owned joint venture, PBL, during this time period.
Sales. Our consolidated sales for the three months ended June 30, 2005 increased 0.3% to $269.3 million from $268.5 million in the same period of 2004. The following table presents sales by business segment (in thousands):
| Three Months Ended June 30, |
$ Change |
% Change |
|||||||||||
| 2005 |
2004 |
||||||||||||
| Paperboard |
$ | 68,703 | $ | 72,609 | $ | (3,906 | ) | (5.4 | )% | ||||
| Recovered fiber |
20,424 | 20,838 | (414 | ) | (2.0 | )% | |||||||
| Tube, core and composite container |
100,971 | 99,139 | 1,832 | 1.8 | % | ||||||||
| Carton and custom packaging |
79,214 | 75,885 | 3,329 | 4.4 | % | ||||||||
| Total |
$ | 269,312 | $ | 268,471 | $ | 841 | 0.3 | % | |||||
Paperboard Segment
Sales for the paperboard segment decreased due to the following factors:
| | Lower volume accounted for approximately $2.7 million of the decrease, primarily as a result of downtime and inefficiencies associated with an equipment upgrade at our Sweetwater mill. |
| | Lower sales of approximately $4.6 million due to the June 2004 divestiture of the chemical sales operation combined with lower volume in the paperboard segments converting operations. |
These factors were partially offset by higher selling prices for unconverted paperboard which accounted for an estimated $3.5 million increase in sales.
Recovered Fiber Segment
Sales for the recovered fiber segment decreased primarily due to lower selling prices, which were partially offset by higher volume.
Tube, Core and Composite Container Segment
Sales for the tube, core and composite container segment increased due to higher selling prices which accounted for an increase of $3.6 million. This increase was partially offset by lower volume, which accounted for an estimated $1.8 million decrease in sales.
Carton and Custom Packaging Segment
Sales for the carton and custom packaging segment increased due to higher selling prices and contract packaging volume which accounted for approximately $3.6 million of the increase.
Gross Profit Margin. Gross profit margin for the three months ended June 30, 2005 decreased to 14.7% of sales from 16.2% in 2004. This margin decrease was due primarily to the following:
| | Lower volume in the paperboard segment, primarily a result of downtime and inefficiencies associated with an equipment upgrade at our Sweetwater paperboard mill, lowered gross profit by approximately $3.0 million. |
| | Higher pension, group health and other employee costs of approximately $2.9 million. |
| | Higher energy costs in the paperboard segment of approximately $2.5 million. |
| | Higher freight costs of approximately $2.5 million. |
| | Higher other manufacturing costs of approximately $2.5 million. These cost increases were primarily driven by the increase in petroleum based products used in the manufacturing process. |
28
These factors were partially offset by the following:
| | An increase in paperboard mill selling prices and a decrease in recovered fiber costs, accounted for an estimated $6.3 million increase in gross profit. |
| | Higher selling prices in the carton and custom packaging segment accounted for an estimated $2.3 million increase in gross profit. |
| | Higher selling prices, net of higher paperboard costs, in the tube and core segment accounted for an estimated $2.6 million increase in gross profit. |
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses were $35.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005, an increase of 4.8% for the same period in 2004. The increase in selling, general and administrative expense is primarily due to:
| | Higher employee and administrative costs of approximately $2.0 million related to two initiatives: centralization of our accounting and finance operations and an investment in other back office functions in order to reduce professional fees, purchasing and other costs in the long term. |
| | The carton and custom packaging segment recorded a reserve of approximately $1.0 million for costs related to a product recall. |
| | Higher pension, group health and other employee costs of approximately $800 thousand. |
These factors were partially offset by:
| | Lower selling general and administrative expenses of approximately $1.9 million as a result of restructuring and closed facilities. |
| | Lower accounts receivable reserve expense of $1.0 million. |
Restructuring and Impairment Costs. In June 2005, we announced the permanent closure of our Palmer carton plant located in Thorndike, Massachusetts. In the second quarter, we recorded a charge of approximately $200 thousand for severance and other benefits in connection with this closure. We expect to incur an additional $328 thousand of severance and other termination benefit costs and an additional $408 thousand in other expense related to the closure of this facility. The Palmer carton plant ceased operations in mid July in order to facilitate customer transition to our other carton operations.
During the second quarter of 2005, we incurred a $66 thousand loss on disposal of fixed assets, $90 thousand in severance and other benefit costs, $149 thousand of other exit costs. We paid $351 thousand in severance and other termination benefits and paid $470 thousand for other exit costs in the second quarter of 2005, leaving an accrual of $4.6 million at June 30, 2005. As of June 30, 2005, these plans are substantially complete and will be finalized upon the sale of real estate associated with the closed facilities.
See the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding our restructuring plans.
Income (loss) from operations. Income from operations for the three months ended June 30, 2005 was $3.8 million, a decrease of $3.5 million over the operating income of $7.3 million for the same period last year. The following table presents income (loss) from operations by business segment (in thousands):
| Three Months Ended June 30, |
$ Change |
% Change |
|||||||||||||
| 2005 |
2004 |
||||||||||||||
| Paperboard |
$ | 5,666 | $ | 6,651 | $ | (985 | ) | (14.8 | )% | ||||||
| Recovered fiber |
(67 | ) | 579 | (646 | ) | (111.7 | )% | ||||||||
| Tube, core and composite container |
2,739 | 4,547 | (1,808 | ) | (39.8 | )% | |||||||||
| Carton and custom packaging |
1,903 | 473 | 1,430 | 302.3 | % | ||||||||||
| Corporate expense |
(6,471 | ) | (4,970 | ) | (1,501 | ) | 30.2 | % | |||||||
| Total |
$ | 3,770 | $ | 7,280 | $ | (3,510 | ) | (48.2 | )% | ||||||
29
Paperboard Segment
The decrease in income from operations was a result of the following:
| | Lower volume, primarily a result of downtime and inefficiencies associated with an equipment upgrade at our Sweetwater paperboard mill, lowered gross profit by approximately $3.0 million. |
| | Higher energy costs of approximately $2.5 million. |
| | Higher pension, group health and other employee costs of approximately $1.5 million |
| | Higher freight costs of approximately $1.0 million. |
| | Higher other manufacturing costs of approximately $1.0 million. |
These factors were partially offset by:
| | An increase in paperboard mill selling prices and a decrease in recovered fiber cost accounted for an estimated $6.3 million increase in income from operations. |
| | Lower selling general and administrative expenses of approximately $800 thousand as a result of restructuring and closed facilities. |
| | Lower restructuring costs of approximately $550 thousand. |
| | Lower accounts receivable reserve expense of approximately $500 thousand. |
Recovered Fiber Segment
The decrease in income from operations was a result of higher freight costs of $800 thousand, partially offset by lower accounts receivable reserve expense of $200 thousand.
Tube, Core and Composite Container Segment
The decrease in income from operations was a result of the following:
| | Higher manufacturing costs of approximately $1.4 million. |
| | Higher pension, group health and workers compensation insurance expense of approximately $900 thousand. |
| | Higher freight costs of approximately $800 thousand. |
| | Higher resin and other manufacturing costs in our composite container division of approximately $600 thousand. |
| | Higher administrative and employee costs of approximately $360 thousand related to the centralization of our accounting and finance operations and additional back office functions. |
These factors were partially offset by higher selling prices, net of higher paperboard costs, which accounted for a $2.6 million increase in income from operations.
Carton and Custom Packaging Segment
The increase in income from operations was a result of the following:
| | Higher selling prices and volume accounted for approximately $2.3 million of the increase. |
| | Lower restructuring and closed facility costs of $700 thousand. |
| | Reversal of a reserve related to a specific customer that filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy and other miscellaneous expenses accounted for approximately $900 thousand of the increase in income from operations. |
These factors were partially offset by the following:
| | Accelerated depreciation and other expenses of approximately $760 thousand as a result of closing down the Palmer carton plant located in Thorndike, Massachusetts. |
| | A reserve of approximately $1.0 million for costs related to a product recall. |
| | Higher pension, group health and other employee expense of approximately $800 thousand. |
Other Income (Expense). Interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004 was approximately $10.4 million and $10.6 million, respectively. See Liquidity and Capital Resources for additional information regarding our debt, interest expense and interest rate swap agreements.
30
Equity in income from unconsolidated affiliates was $9.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005, an improvement of $3.2 million over equity in income from unconsolidated affiliates of $6.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004. This increase was due to a significant improvement in operating results for Standard Gypsum and Premier Boxboard Limited. These improved results were due primarily to an increase in selling prices and volume for both joint ventures, which were driven by the strong housing market.
(Provision) Benefit for income taxes. The effective rate of income tax expense for the three months ended June 30, 2005 was 94.7%, compared to an effective rate of 43.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2004. The effective rates for both periods are different from the statutory rates due to permanent tax adjustments. In addition, the income tax expense for the three months ended June 30, 2005 includes tax expense of $1.9 million related to an increase in the valuation allowance for state net operating losses resulting from a change in Ohio tax law. On June 30, 2005, significant changes to the tax system of the State of Ohio were signed into law which will eliminate the Ohio franchise tax over the five year period ending December 31, 2010. The valuation allowance was recorded in its entirety at June 30, 2005 since the benefits of the net operating losses are not expected to be realized.
Net Income (Loss). Due to the factors discussed above, net income for the three months ended June 30, 2005 was $114 thousand, or $0.00 net income per common share, compared to net income of $1.7 million, or $0.06 net income per common share, for the same period last year.
Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
| Six Months Ended June 30, |
Change |
% Change |
|||||||||||
| 2005 |
2004 |
||||||||||||
| Paperboard tons shipped by production source (in thousands): |
|||||||||||||
| From internal paperboard mill production |
484.1 | 494.2 | (10.1 | ) | (2.0 | )% | |||||||
| Purchases from external sources |
61.8 | 67.3 | (5.5 | ) | (8.2 | )% | |||||||
| Total paperboard tonnage |
545.9 | 561.5 | (15.6 | ) | (2.8 | )% | |||||||
| Paperboard tons shipped by end-use market (in thousands): |
|||||||||||||
| Tube, core and composite container volume |
|||||||||||||
| Paperboard (internal) |
121.4 | 123.5 | (2.1 | ) | (1.7 | )% | |||||||
| Purchases from external sources |
21.0 | 21.9 | (0.9 | ) | (4.1 | )% | |||||||
| Tube, core and composite container converted products |
142.4 | 145.4 | (3.0 | ) | (2.1 | )% | |||||||
| Unconverted paperboard shipped to external customers |
25.0 | 24.9 | 0.1 | 0.4 | % | ||||||||
| Tube, core and composite container volume |
167.4 | 170.3 | (2.9 | ) | (1.7 | )% | |||||||
| Folding carton volume |
|||||||||||||
| Paperboard (internal) |
47.3 | 48.7 | (1.4 | ) | (2.9 | )% | |||||||
| Purchases from external sources |
36.4 | 39.8 | (3.4 | ) | (8.5 | )% | |||||||
| Folding carton converted products |
83.7 | 88.5 | (4.8 | ) | (5.4 | )% | |||||||
| Unconverted paperboard shipped to external customers |
120.8 | 117.5 | 3.3 | 2.8 | % | ||||||||
| Folding carton volume |
204.5 | 206.0 | (1.5 | ) | (0.7 | )% | |||||||
| Gypsum wallboard facing paper volume |
|||||||||||||
| Unconverted paperboard shipped to external customers |
34.1 | 51.8 | (17.7 | ) | (34.2 | )% | |||||||
| Other specialty products volume |
|||||||||||||
| Paperboard (internal) |
46.1 | 40.6 | 5.5 | 13.5 | % | ||||||||
| Purchases from external sources |
4.4 | 5.6 | (1.2 | ) | (21.4 | )% | |||||||
| Other specialty converted products |
50.5 | 46.2 | 4.3 | 9.3 | % | ||||||||
| Unconverted paperboard shipped to external customers |
89.4 | 87.2 | 2.2 | 2.5 | % | ||||||||
| Other specialty products volume |
139.9 | 133.4 | 6.5 | 4.8 | % | ||||||||
| Total paperboard tonnage |
545.9 | 561.5 | (15.6 | ) | (2.8 | )% | |||||||
| Selling price and cost data ($/ton): |
|||||||||||||
| Paperboard mills: |
|||||||||||||
| Average selling price |
$ | 475 | $ | 446 | $ | 29 | 6.5 | % | |||||
| Average recovered fiber cost |
109 | 105 | 4 | 3.8 | % | ||||||||
| Tube and core facilities: |
|||||||||||||
| Average selling price |
$ | 944 | $ | 887 | $ | 57 | 6.4 | % | |||||
| Average paperboard cost |
502 | 466 | 36 | 7.7 | % | ||||||||
31
The following table shows paperboard shipment volume on our business segment basis (thousands of tons).
| Six Months Ended June 30, |
Change |
% Change |
||||||||
| 2005 |
2004 |
|||||||||
| Paperboard segment |
||||||||||
| Unconverted paperboard shipped to external customers |
269.4 | 281.4 | (12.0 | ) | (4.3 | )% | ||||
| Paperboard shipped internally to converters in the paperboard segment |
31.5 | 26.2 | 5.3 | 20.2 | % | |||||
| Paperboard purchased externally by converters in the paperboard segment |
0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 50.0 | % | |||||
| Total volume |
301.2 | 307.8 | (6.6 | ) | (2.1 | )% | ||||
| Tube, core and composite container segment |
||||||||||
| Paperboard (internal) |
136.0 | 137.9 | (1.9 | ) | (1.4 | )% | ||||
| Purchases from external sources |
25.1 | 27.3 | (2.2 | ) | (8.1 | )% | ||||
| Total volume converted |
161.1 | 165.2 | (4.1 | ) | (2.5 | )% | ||||
| Carton and custom packaging segment |
||||||||||
| Paperboard (internal) |
47.2 | 48.7 | (1.5 | ) | (3.1 | )% | ||||
| Purchases from external sources |
36.4 | 39.8 | (3.4 | ) | (8.5 | )% | ||||
| Total volume converted |
83.6 | 88.5 | (4.9 | ) | (5.5 | )% | ||||
| Total paperboard tonnage |
545.9 | 561.5 | (15.6 | ) | (2.8 | )% | ||||
Paperboard Tonnage. Total paperboard tonnage for the six months ended June 30, 2005, decreased 2.8% to 545.9 thousand tons from 561.5 thousand tons for the same period in 2004. Tons sold from paperboard mill production decreased 2.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2005, compared to the same period in 2004. Total tonnage converted decreased 1.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2005.
Total paperboard tonnage decreased due to the following factors:
| | This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in gypsum facing paper sales resulting from downtime and inefficiencies associated with an equipment upgrade at our Sweetwater paperboard mill. The volume lost at the Sweetwater mill was largely shifted to our 50% owned joint venture, PBL, during this time period. |
| | A decrease in internal conversion by our tube, core and composite container and folding carton operations. |
These decreases were partially offset by:
| | An increase in internal conversion by our other specialty operations. |
| | An increase in sales of unconverted paperboard to the folding carton and other specialty end-use markets. |
Sales. Our consolidated sales for the six months ended June 30, 2005, increased 2.5% to $538.8 million from $525.6 million for the same period in 2004. The following table presents sales by business segment (in thousands):
| Six Months Ended June 30, |
$ Change |
% Change |
|||||||||||
| 2005 |
2004 |
||||||||||||
| Paperboard |
$ | 137,693 | $ | 143,115 | $ | (5,422 | ) | (3.8 | )% | ||||
| Recovered fiber |
41,594 | 38,191 | 3,403 | 8.9 | % | ||||||||
| Tube, core and composite container |
200,757 | 193,362 | 7,395 | 3.8 | % | ||||||||
| Carton and custom packaging |
158,792 | 150,898 | 7,894 | 5.2 | % | ||||||||
| Total |
$ | 538,836 | $ | 525,566 | $ | 13,270 | 2.5 | % | |||||
Paperboard Segment
Sales for the paperboard segment decreased due to the following factors:
| | Lower volume accounted for approximately $5.1 million of the decrease, primarily as a result of downtime and inefficiencies associated with an equipment upgrade at our Sweetwater paperboard mill. |
| | Lower volume in the paperboard segments converting operations, combined with the June 2004 divestiture of the chemical sales operation, accounted for approximately $8.3 million of the decrease. |
These factors were partially offset by higher selling prices which accounted for an estimated $8.0 million increase in sales.
32
Recovered Fiber Segment
Sales for the recovered fiber segment increased due to higher volume primarily attributable to six months of activity in 2005 for a new greenfield brokerage facility that began operations in the second quarter of 2004. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in selling price.
Tube, Core and Composite Container Segment
Sales for the tube, core and composite container segment increased due to the following factors:
| | Higher selling prices for tubes and cores, accounted for approximately $7.4 million of the increase. |
| | Higher composite container products volume accounted for approximately $1.4 million of the increase. |
These increases were partially offset by a decline in sales of plastic cores and paperboard partitions of approximately $1.1 million.
Carton and Custom Packaging Segment
Sales for the carton and custom packaging segment increased due to the following factors:
| | Higher contract packaging volume accounted for approximately $5.8 million of the increase. |
| | Higher carton pricing, partially offset by lower volume accounted for approximately $1.2 million of the increase. |
| | Higher corrugated sales accounted for approximately $900 thousand of the increase. |
Gross Profit Margin. Gross profit margin for the six months ended June 30, 2005, decreased to 14.7% of sales from 15.2% for the same period in 2004. This margin decrease was due to the following factors:
| | Higher freight costs of approximately $6.0 million. |
| | Higher paperboard costs in our carton and custom packaging segment of approximately $5.5 million. |
| | Higher energy costs in the paperboard segment of approximately $4.2 million. |
| | Higher manufacturing and other costs of approximately $4.2 million |
| | Lower volume in the paperboard segment reduced gross profit by approximately $3.5 million primarily as a result of downtime and inefficiencies associated with an equipment upgrade at our Sweetwater paper mill. |
| | Higher pension, group health and other employee costs of approximately $2.5 million. |
| | Higher resin and other manufacturing costs in our composite container operations of approximately $1.3 million. |
| | Accelerated depreciation and other expenses of approximately $760 thousand as a result of closing the Palmer carton plant located in Thorndike, Massachusetts. |
These factors were partially offset by:
| | An increase in paperboard mill selling prices and a decrease in recovered fiber costs accounted for an estimated $12.6 million increase in gross profit. |
| | Higher selling prices in the carton and custom packaging segment accounted for an estimated $8.6 million increase in gross profit. |
| | Higher selling prices, net of higher paperboard costs, in the tube and core segment accounted for an estimated $3.3 million increase in gross profit. |
| | In 2004, we recorded a $2.1 million inventory reserve for a specific carton customer that filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy, We reversed $1.1 million of this reserve during the first six months of 2005 resulting in a $3.2 million year over year increase in gross profit. |
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses were $71.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, an increase of 3.7% from the same period in 2004. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased due to the following factors:
| | Higher employee and administrative costs of approximately $5.6 million related to two initiatives: centralization of our accounting and finance operations and an investment in other back office functions in order to reduce professional fees, purchasing and other costs in the long term. |
33
| | The carton and custom packaging segment recorded a reserve of approximately $1.0 million for costs related to a product recall. |
These factors were partially offset by:
| | Lower selling general and administrative expenses of approximately $2.7 million as a result of restructured and closed facilities. |
| | Lower accounts receivable reserve expense of $2.0 million. |
Restructuring and Impairment Costs. In June 2005, we announced the permanent closure of our Palmer carton plant located in Thorndike, Massachusetts. In the second quarter we recorded a charge of approximately $200 thousand for severance and other benefits in connection with this closure. We expect to incur an additional $328 thousand of severance and other termination benefit costs and an additional $408 thousand in other expense related to the closure of this facility. The Palmer carton plant ceased operations in mid July in order to facilitate customer transition to our other carton operations.
During the six months ended June 30, 2005, we incurred a $249 thousand charge for impairment of assets, $90 thousand for severance and other termination benefits and $569 thousand for other exit costs. In the six months ended June 30, 2005 we paid $1.1 million in severance and other termination benefits and paid $1.4 million for other exit costs.
See the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding our restructuring plans.
Income (Loss) From Operations. Income from operations for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was $6.4 million, an increase of $1.2 million compared with operating income of $5.2 million for the same period in 2004. The following table presents income (loss) from operations by business segment (in thousands):
| Six Months Ended June 30, |
$ Change |
% Change |
|||||||||||||
| 2005 |
2004 |
||||||||||||||
| Paperboard |
$ | 11,916 | $ | 10,694 | $ | 1,222 | 11.4 | % | |||||||
| Recovered fiber |
768 | 1,356 | (588 | ) | (43.4 | )% | |||||||||
| Tube, core and composite container |
3,276 | 7,826 | (4,550 | ) | (58.1 | )% | |||||||||
| Carton and custom packaging |
3,403 | (4,063 | ) | 7,466 | (183.8 | )% | |||||||||
| Corporate expense |
(12,980 | ) | (10,628 | ) | (2,352 | ) | 22.1 | % | |||||||
| Total |
$ | 6,383 | $ | 5,185 | $ | 1,198 | 23.1 | % | |||||||
Paperboard Segment
Income from operations increased due to the following factors:
The increase in income from operations was a result of the following:
| | An increase in paperboard mill selling prices and a decrease in recovered fiber costs accounted for an estimated $12.6 million increase. |
| | Lower restructuring costs and savings from closed facilities of approximately $2.7 million. |
These factors were partially offset by:
| | Higher energy costs of approximately $4.2 million. |
| | Lower volume in the paperboard segment reduced operating income by approximately $3.5 million primarily as a result of downtime and inefficiencies associated with an equipment upgrade at our Sweetwater paperboard mill. |
| | Higher freight costs of approximately $2.7 million. |
| | Higher pension, group health and other employee costs of approximately $1.6 million. |
| | Higher other manufacturing costs of approximately $1.1 million. |
| | Higher employee and administrative costs of approximately $1.1 million related to two initiatives; centralization of our accounting and finance operations and an investment in other back office functions in order to reduce professional fees, purchasing and other costs in the long term. |
34
Recovered Fiber Segment
Income from operations decreased due to the following factors:
| | Higher freight costs of approximately $1.7 million. |
| | Higher general operating costs of approximately $800 thousand. |
| | Higher employee and administrative costs of approximately $300 thousand related to two initiatives: centralization of our accounting and finance operations and an investment in other back office functions in order to reduce professional fees, purchasing and other costs in the long term. |
These factors were partially offset by
| | Higher sales volume, partially offset by a decrease in selling price and higher paper costs resulted in an approximate $1.7 million increase in income from operations. |
| | Lower accounts receivable reserve expense of approximately $600 thousand. |
Tube, Core and Composite Container Segment
Income from operations decreased due to the following factors:
| | Higher tube and core manufacturing costs of approximately $3.1 million. |
| | Higher freight costs of approximately $1.6 million. |
| | Higher resin and other manufacturing costs in our composite container division of approximately $1.3 million. |
| | Higher pension, group health and other employee costs of approximately $900 thousand. |
| | Higher administrative and employee costs of approximately $650 thousand related to the centralization of our accounting and finance operations and additional back office functions. |
These factors were partially offset by higher selling prices, net of higher paperboard costs, which accounted for an approximate $3.3 million increase in income from operations.
Carton and Custom Packaging Segment
The increase in income from operations was a result of the following:
| | Higher selling price and contract packaging volume accounted for approximately $8.6 million of the increase. |
| | In 2004, we recorded a $2.1 million inventory reserve for a specific carton customer that filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy. We reversed $1.1 million of this reserve during the first six months of 2005 resulting in a $3.2 million year over year increase in income from operations. |
| | Lower restructuring costs and savings related to closed facilities costs of approximately $1.8 million. |
| | Reversal of a specific reserve related to the potential bankruptcy of a specific customer and other miscellaneous expenses accounted for approximately $1.2 million. |
These factors were partially offset by the following:
| | Higher paperboard costs of approximately $5.5 million. |
| | Higher employee and administrative costs of approximately $800 thousand related to two initiatives; centralization of our accounting and finance operations and an investment in other back office functions in order to reduce professional fees, purchasing and other costs in the long term. |
| | Accelerated depreciation and other expenses of approximately $760 thousand as a result of closing the Palmer carton plant located in Thorndike, Massachusetts. |
| | The carton and custom packaging segment recorded a reserve of approximately $1.0 million for costs related to a product recall. |
Other Income (Expense). Interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 was approximately $21.1 million and $21.2 million, respectively. See Liquidity and Capital Resources for additional information regarding our debt, interest expense and interest rate swap agreements.
Equity in income from unconsolidated affiliates was $17.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, an improvement of $8.8 million over equity in income from unconsolidated affiliates of $9.1 million for the same period in 2004. This increase was primarily due to a $4.9 million improvement in operating results for Standard Gypsum, our gypsum wallboard joint venture with
35
Temple-Inland. The improved results were due primarily to an increase in selling prices and volume driven by the strong housing and remodeling markets. Premier Boxboards results improved $4.1 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2005 compared to 2004, primarily due to higher volume and selling prices.
Benefit for Income Taxes. The effective rate of income tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was 85.3%, compared to an effective rate of income tax benefit 29.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2004. The effective rates for both periods are different from the statutory rates due to permanent tax adjustments. In addition, the income tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2005 includes tax expense of $1.9 million related to an increase in the valuation allowance for state net operating losses resulting from a change in Ohio tax law. On June 30, 2005, significant changes to the tax system of the State of Ohio were signed into law which will eliminate the Ohio franchise tax over the five year period ending December 31, 2010. The valuation allowance was recorded in its entirety at June 30, 2005 since the benefits of the net operating losses are not expected to be realized.
Net Income (loss). Due to the factors discussed above, net income for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was $568 thousand, or $0.02 net income per common share, compared to a net loss of $5.0 million, or $0.18 net loss per common share, for the same period in 2004.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity Sources and Risks. Our primary sources of liquidity are cash from operations and borrowings under our senior credit facility, described below. Downturns in operations can significantly affect our ability to generate cash. Factors that can affect our operating results and liquidity are discussed further in our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K under Risk Factors in Part I, Item 1. For the six-month period ended June 30, 2005, we generated $9.1 million in cash from operating activities compared with a use of cash of $951 thousand during the same period in 2004. We believe that our cash on hand at June 30, 2005 of $86.7 million and borrowing availability under our senior credit facility will be sufficient to meet our cash requirements for the year ended December 31, 2005 and the foreseeable future. Additionally, based on our historical ability to generate cash, we believe we will be able to meet our long-term cash requirements. However, if we are unable to generate cash at historic levels, our ability to generate cash sufficient to meet long-term requirements is uncertain. The following are factors that could affect our future ability to generate cash from operations:
| | a contraction in domestic demand for recycled paperboard and related packaging products similar to what our industry experienced in 2000, 2001 and 2002; |
| | increased market acceptance of alternative products, such as flexible packaging and plastics, that have replaced or can replace certain of our packaging products; |
| | continued export of domestic industrial manufacturing operations; and |
| | continued increase in fuel costs |
| | significant unforeseen adverse conditions in our industry or the markets we serve. |
The occurrence, continuation or exacerbation of these conditions could require us to seek additional funds from external sources in order to meet our liquidity requirements. In such event, our ability to obtain additional funds would depend on the various business and credit market conditions prevailing at the time, which are difficult to predict and many of which are out of our control. Our ability to secure additional funds could also be materially adversely affected by our substantial indebtedness. Additional risks related to our substantial indebtedness are discussed under Risk Factors Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our cash flow and our ability to fulfill our obligations under our indebtedness in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
The availability of liquidity from our senior credit facility is primarily affected by our continued compliance with the terms of the senior credit facility agreement governing our senior credit facility, including the payment of interest and compliance with various covenants and financial maintenance tests. We were in compliance with the covenants under our senior credit facility during the six months ended June 30, 2005. Absent a deterioration of the U.S. economy as a whole or the specific sectors on which our business depends, we believe we will be in compliance with our covenants under the senior credit agreement during the remainder of 2005.
Borrowings. At June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, total debt (consisting of current maturities of debt and long-term debt, as reported on our condensed consolidated balance sheets) was as follows (in thousands):
| June 30, 2005 |
December 31, 2004 | |||||
| Senior credit facility |
$ | | $ | | ||
| 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes |
262,500 | 265,000 | ||||
| 7 3/8% senior notes |
189,750 | 189,750 | ||||
| 7 1/4% senior notes |
29,000 | 29,000 | ||||
| Other notes payable |
9,735 | 9,735 | ||||
| Mark-to-market value of interest swap agreements |
| | ||||
| Net premiums (1) |
12,457 | 12,736 | ||||
| Total debt |
$ | 503,442 | $ | 506,221 | ||
| (1) | These amounts consist of realized interest rate swap gains less the original issuance discounts and accumulated discount amortization related to the senior and senior subordinated notes. As described below under Interest Rate Swap Agreements, realized gains resulting from unwinding interest rate swaps are recorded as a component of debt and will be accreted as a reduction to interest expense over the remaining term of the debt. |
36
Our senior credit facility provides for a revolving line of credit of $75.0 million and is secured primarily by a first priority security interest in our accounts receivable and inventory. The facility includes a subfacility of $50.0 million for letters of credit, usage of which reduces availability under the facility. As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, no borrowings were outstanding under the facility; however, an aggregate of $37.9 million and $38.4 million in letter of credit obligations were outstanding, respectively. Availability under the facility at June 30, 2005 was limited to $37.1 million after taking into consideration outstanding letter of credit obligations.
Effective March 1, 2005 we amended our senior credit facility to increase the aggregate amount of permitted asset sales from $5.0 million to $15.0 million, to reduce the unused facility fee from 0.50% to 0.375%, and to reduce the applicable interest margins above the Base Rate and LIBOR Rate for borrowings and outstanding letters of credit under the facility. The interest margin for Base Rate borrowings was reduced from 0.50% to a range from (0.25%) to 0.25%, and the margin for LIBOR Rate borrowings and outstanding letters of credit was reduced from 2.50% to a range from 1.50% to 2.00%, with the applicable margin to be set based on our levels of available cash. At June 30, 2005, the applicable interest margin for Base Rate borrowings was (0.25%) and the applicable interest margin for LIBOR Rate borrowings was 1.50%.
Interest Rate Swap Agreements. From time to time, we have entered into interest rate swap agreements related to our senior notes and senior subordinated notes. The payment and expiration date for these interest rate swaps correspond to the terms of the note obligations they cover. These interest rate swap agreements effectively convert an amount of our fixed debt into variable rate obligations. Typically, the variable amounts are based upon a three-month or six-month LIBOR plus a fixed margin. When we have unwound these agreements and recognized a gain, the amount is classified as a component of debt and is accreted to interest expense over the remaining life of the notes and partially offsets an increase in interest expense.
In March 2004, we unwound a $50.0 million interest rate swap agreement related to our 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes and received approximately $380 thousand from the bank counter-party. The $380 thousand gain, classified as a component of debt, is being accreted over the remaining life of the notes and will partially offset the increase in interest expense.
In April 2004, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement in the notional amount of $50.0 million. This agreement effectively converted $50.0 million of the Companys fixed rate 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes into variable rate obligations. The variable rates were based on six-month LIBOR plus a fixed margin.
In March 2005, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement in the notional amount of $50.0 million. This agreement effectively converted $50.0 million of our fixed rate 7 3/8% senior notes into variable rate obligations. The variable rates were based on three-month LIBOR plus a fixed margin.
In June 2005, we unwound the March 2005 $50.0 million interest rate swap agreement related to the 7 3/8% senior notes and received approximately $826 thousand from the bank counter-party. The $826 thousand gain was classified as a component of debt, and is being accreted over the remaining life of the notes and will partially offset the increase in interest expense.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements Joint Venture Financings. As noted above, we own a 50% interest in two joint ventures with Temple-Inland, Inc.: Standard Gypsum, L.P. and Premier Boxboard Limited LLC. Because we account for these interests in our joint ventures under the equity method of accounting, the indebtedness of these joint ventures is not reflected in the liabilities included on our consolidated balance sheets.
At December 31, 2004, PBL was the borrower under a credit facility with and aggregate outstanding principal amount of $632 thousand, consisting solely of an undrawn letter of credit. On January 5, 2005, Premier Boxboards revolving credit facility expired. The only outstanding obligation under the facility at the time of expiration was the $632 thousand letter of credit balance, which expired on June 20, 2005 and was not renewed. Premier Boxboard placed $614 thousand of available cash into a
37
trust account to replace the expired letter of credit. Since December 31, 2004, there have been no other material changes in our obligations with respect to the letter of credit obligations of these joint ventures, or any additional contingencies related to buy-sell agreements for our interests in the joint ventures. For more information about these obligations and contingencies, see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and Capital Resources Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Cash from Operations. Cash generated from operations was $9.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, compared with $951 thousand used in operations for the same period of 2004. The increase in 2005 compared to the same period in 2004 was due primarily to an $11.5 million increase in distributions from our joint venture partners, Standard Gypsum and Premier Boxboard.
Capital Expenditures. Capital expenditures were $11.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 versus $8.9 million for the same period of 2004. Aggregate capital expenditures of approximately $25.0 million are anticipated for 2005. To conserve cash, we intend to limit capital expenditures for 2005 to cost reduction, productivity improvement and replacement projects.
Inflation
Raw material and energy cost changes have had, and continue to have, a material negative effect on our operations. We do not believe that general economic inflation is a significant determinant of our raw material and energy cost increases or that it has a material effect on our operations.
New Accounting Pronouncements
On April 14, 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced that the required effective date for adopting SFAS No. 123 (R), Share-Based Payment has been deferred to fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005 instead of an effective date beginning July 1, 2005. The Company will be required to adopt this statement January 1, 2006.
Contractual Obligations
For a discussion of our contractual obligations, see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and Capital Resources Contractual Obligations and Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. There have been no significant developments with respect to our contractual obligations since December 31, 2004 other than the addition of capital lease obligations in the approximate amount of $1.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The expected lease payments in 2006 and 2007 are approximately $557 thousand and $557 thousand, respectively.
Forward-Looking Information
This quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains certain forward-looking statements, within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that represent our expectations, anticipations or beliefs about future events, including our operating results financial condition, liquidity, expenditures, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. For this purpose, any statements that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. These statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially depending on a variety of important factors, including, but not limited to, fluctuations in raw material prices and energy costs, increases in pension and insurance costs, downturns in industrial production, housing and construction and the consumption of durable and nondurable goods, the degree and nature of competition, demand for our products, the degree of success achieved by our new product initiatives, changes in government regulations, the application or interpretation of those regulations or in the systems, personnel technologies or other resources we devote to compliance with regulations, our ability to complete acquisitions and successfully integrate the operations of acquired businesses, our ability to service our substantial indebtedness unforeseen difficulties with the integration of our accounting and control operations, IT systems or legal function. Additional relevant risk
38
factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are discussed in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. With respect to such forward-looking statements, we claim protection under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Our SEC filings are available from us, and also may be examined at public reference facilities maintained by the Securities and Exchange Commission or, to the extent filed via EDGAR, accessed through the Web Site of the Securities and Exchange Commission (http://www.sec.gov). We do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements we make.
Risk Factors
For a discussion of our risk factors, see Risk Factors in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. There have been no significant developments with respect to our risk factors since December 31, 2004.
39
PART I
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
For a discussion of certain market risks related to us, see Part II, Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. There have been no significant developments with respect to our exposure to interest rate market risks. See Note 5 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for additional information about our interest rate swap agreements.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There was no change to our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended June 30, 2005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of June 30, 2005. Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2005, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by the Companys reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
The Company previously reported that its Sprague facility received a proposed consent order from the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (CTDEP) alleging the facility had exceeded the visible emissions standards in the second and third quarters of 2004 and the sulfur dioxide emissions standard for the first quarter of 2003. The Company resolved this matter with the CTDEP during the second quarter of 2005. The Sprague facility accepted a civil penalty, including corrective action and fines totaling approximately $182 thousand. In response to this matter, the Company previously implemented, and continues to monitor, operational changes that management believes will enable the Company to comply prospectively with these visible emissions and sulfur dioxide standards.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
In February 2002, we announced that we would suspend future dividend payments on our common stock until our earnings performance and cash flow performance improve. Our debt agreements contain certain limitations on the payment of dividends and currently preclude us from doing so.
The following table sets forth all purchases made by or on behalf of the Company or an affiliated purchaser, as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Exchange Act, of shares of the Companys common stock during each month for the three months ended June 30, 2005.
| Period |
(a) Total Number of Shares Purchased (1) |
(b) Average Price Paid per Share |
(c) Total Number of Shares Purchased as part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs |
(d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under Plans or Programs | |||||
| January 1 January 31, 2005 |
| $ | 0.00 | | | ||||
| February 1 February 29, 2005 |
| $ | 0.00 | | | ||||
| March 1 March 31, 2005 |
| $ | 0.00 | | | ||||
| April 1 April 30, 2005 |
| $ | 0.00 | | | ||||
| May 1 May 31, 2005 |
255 | $ | 10.31 | | | ||||
| June 1 June 30, 2005 |
1,534 | $ | 11.14 | | | ||||
| (1) | These shares were surrendered by employees to satisfy the employees minimum withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted common stock issued by the Company. The Company does not consider the purchase of shares from employees in this context to be pursuant to a publicly announced plan or program. The table excludes shares withheld from employees in cashless exercises to satisfy minimum withholding requirements and to pay the exercise price of options. |
40
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Our annual shareholders meeting was held on May 18, 2005. The matters voted upon at the meeting were (1) proposal to elect three Class I directors (L. Celeste Bottorff, Dennis M. Love, Eric R. Zarnikow) and one Class II director (Charles H. Greiner, Jr.), (2) proposal to amend the Companys 2003 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan and (3) a proposal to ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent public accountants for fiscal year 2005. Proposals (1), (2) and (3) were approved by the following margins:
| Proposal |
Votes for |
Votes Against or Withheld |
Abstentions |
Broker Nonvotes | ||||
| Election of Directors |
||||||||
| L. Celeste Bottorff |
25,329,577 | 403,911 | | | ||||
| Charles H. Greiner, Jr. |
25,251,168 | 482,320 | | | ||||
| Dennis M. Love |
25,253,378 | 480,110 | | | ||||
| Eric R. Zarnikow |
25,326,033 | 407,455 | | | ||||
| Amendment of 2003 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan |
18,540,997 | 4,798,066 | 61,573 | | ||||
| Ratification of Selection of Independent Public Accountants |
25,607,887 | 104,093 | 21,508 | |
On July 14, 2005, the Compensation and Employee Benefits Committee of the Companys Board of Directors approved an increase, effective August 1, 2005, in the base salary of the Companys President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Michael J. Keough, from $550,000 to $575,000.
On August 5, 2005, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Thomas V. Brown, its immediate past president. The agreement provides that Mr. Brown will serve as a consultant for a term of one year, through July 31, 2006, unless such term is extended by mutual agreement. Mr. Brown will be paid a base rate, subject to adjustment for additional work, of $8,100 per month for services provided pursuant to the agreement. Mr. Brown has agreed to certain restrictions during the term of the agreement and for three years after, including: disclosures of confidential information; and solicitation of the Companys customers and employees. For further information regarding this agreement, see attached consulting agreement filed herewith as an exhibit.
| a) | Exhibits |
The Exhibits to this Report on Form 10-Q are listed in the accompanying Exhibit Index.
41
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIES, INC. | ||
| By: | /s/ Ronald J. Domanico | |
| Ronald J. Domanico | ||
| Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | ||
Date: August 5, 2005
42
| Exhibit No. |
Description | |||
| 3.01 | | Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company (Incorporated by reference Exhibit 3.01 to Annual Report for 1992 on Form 10-K [SEC File No. 0-20646]) | ||
| 3.02 | | Third Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (Incorporated by reference Exhibit 3.02 to Annual Report for 2001 on Form 10-K [SEC File No. 0-20646]) | ||
| 10.1 | | First Amendment to 2003 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan of the Company | ||
| 10.2 | | Consulting Agreement with Thomas V. Brown | ||
| 31.01 | | Certification of CEO Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
| 31.02 | | Certification of CFO Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
| 32.01 | | Certification of CEO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
| 32.02 | | Certification of CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
| | Filed herewith |
43