Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 


FORM 10-KSB

 


(Mark One)

x Annual report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005

 

¨ Transition report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act

Commission file number: 33-55254-36

 


E Med Future, Inc.

(Name of small business issuer in its charter)

 


 

Nevada   87-0485314
(State of incorporation)   (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

794 Morrison Road, Suite 911, Columbus, OH 43230

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

877-855-1319   www.NeedleZap.com
(Issuer’s telephone number)   (Issuer’s website)

 


Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: None

 


Check whether the issuer is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act.  ¨

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-B contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this form 10-KSB  ¨

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

State issuer’s revenues for its most recent fiscal year. $120,509

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of a specified date within the past 60 days. (See definition of affiliate in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.) $1,057,676 as of March 31, 2006.

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date: 32,763,415 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share, as of March 31, 2006

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one):    Yes  ¨    No  x

 



Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PART I       1
  Item 1.    Description of Business.    1
 

Our History

   1
 

Our Products

   1
 

Recent Events

   2
 

Distribution of Our Products

   2
 

Research and Development

   4
 

Patents and Trademarks

   4
 

Royalty Agreement

   4
 

Employees

   4
 

Principal Suppliers

   5
 

Competition

   5
 

Governmental Regulations

   5
 

Forward Looking Statements

   6
 

How to Learn More About E Med

   7
  Item 2.    Description of Property.    7
  Item 3.    Legal Proceedings.    7
  Item 4.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.    8
PART II    8
  Item 5.    Market For Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Small Business Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.    8
  Item 6.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation.    9
 

Looking Ahead

   9
 

Background

   9
 

Results of Operations

   10
 

Net Sales

   10
 

Costs and Expenses

   10
 

Net Loss

   10
 

Selected Financial Data

   10
 

Financial Condition and Liquidity

   11
 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

   12
 

Critical Accounting Policies

   12
  Item 7.    Financial Statements.    12
  Item 8.    Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.    12
  Item 8A.    Controls and Procedures.    12
  Item 8B.    Other Information    13
PART III    13
  Item 9.    Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons; Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.    13
 

Committees of the Board

   13
 

Code of Ethics

   14
 

Compliance with § 16(a) of the Exchange Act

   14

 

i


Table of Contents
  Item 10.    Executive Compensation.    14
 

Director Compensation

   14
 

Equity Compensation Plans

   14
  Item 11.    Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.    15
  Item 12.    Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.    16
 

Lease with Ochsendorf Company

   16
 

Supply Arrangement with Ochsendorf Company

   16
 

Royalty Agreements with Officers

   16
 

Loans from Employees and Directors

   16
 

PR Market Research

   16
 

Representation by Perez & Morris

   16
  Item 13.    Exhibits.    17
  Item 14.    Principal Accountant Fees and Services.    18

SIGNATURES

   19

 

ii


Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1. Description of Business.

Headquartered in Columbus, Ohio, E Med Future, Inc. manufactures and markets products designed to reduce accidental hypodermic needlestick injuries. Our primary product, NeedleZap®, completely disintegrates the sharp portion of the needle. According to the American Nursing Association, there are an estimated one million accidental needlesticks reported in the United States in the healthcare industry alone. We believe the applications for the product are far reaching, and include healthcare professionals, law enforcement and correctional personnel, veterinarians, military, clinical researchers, hospitality, and sanitation workers. NeedleZap® is designed to work within the parameters of recent OSHA needlestick mandates which require employers to take advantage of new technologies to prevent needlesticks in the workplace.

Our History

The Company was formed under the laws of the State of Nevada on March 14, 1990, but until 2003 we were a shell company with no significant operations other than seeking to identify an existing business to acquire. Trading in our stock was dependant on our acquisition of an operating business. On April 4, 2003, we participated in a merger in which we acquired E Med Future, Inc., our operating subsidiary. In connection with the transaction, we issued 19,850,000 unregistered shares of our common stock (95% of our then outstanding shares) to the former stockholders of E Med Future.

Pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, we changed our corporate name from “Micro-Economics, Inc.” to “E Med Future, Inc.” In addition, our original directors resigned and were replaced by Robert J. Ochsendorf, D. Dane Donohue and Juan J. Perez. Our shares began trading on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board under the symbol “EMDF.OB” on April 17, 2003. For additional information about the merger, please see the Report on Form 8-K dated April 4, 2003 that we filed with the SEC on April 11, 2003.

Our Products

Our primary product is NeedleZap®, a revolutionary safety device intended to help reduce accidental needlestick injuries by disintegrating the sharp portion of a hypodermic needle. When a hypodermic needle is inserted into the unit, the patented electrode system disintegrates the needle in approximately two seconds at 2200° F.

In July 2003, we announced the beginning of clinical testing and market evaluation of the first extensions to the NeedleZap® product line which include a dental parking station and butterfly needle burner. We are presently in the process of obtaining patent protection for these new products. Because we lack sufficient funds to expedite the development of these products, both products remain in the development phase. We anticipate that both products will involve supplements to our existing FDA pre-market approval; therefore, introduction and timing of these products into the marketplace will be contingent on FDA approval.

 

1


Table of Contents

The dental parking station is intended to provide a safer, temporary resting place for a hypodermic syringe. During a procedure, dentists often reuse a hypodermic needle on the same patient when additional anesthesia is required. Since the needle is not destroyed immediately after the initial use, dentists generally recap the needle or leave the needle exposed, increasing the risk of an accidental needlestick injury. The NeedleZap® unit sets directly on the dental parking station enabling the dentist to recap, or disintegrate, the hypodermic needle easily with one hand at the end of the procedure, and significantly reducing the risk of a needlestick injury.

The butterfly needle burner is intended to accommodate needles not secured to a hypodermic syringe. Butterfly needles are used primarily for IV’s and kidney dialysis. Since the original NeedleZap® unit was intended to disintegrate hypodermic needles held by a syringe, the butterfly needle burner necessitated design modifications, including a change to the housing and repositioning of the electrode system.

On December 30, 2003, we acquired Medical Safety Technologies, Inc. from UTEK Corporation (AMEX:UTK), an innovative technology transfer company dedicated to building bridges between university developed technologies and commercial organizations. Medical Safety Technologies, or MSTI, holds the worldwide exclusive license to a patented invention, known as the “Safe Receptacle for Sharps,” that is designed to aid in the safe transport of sterile and used sharp medical instruments. This Emory University invention was developed to help reduce the possibility of needlestick injuries by maintaining medical instruments in an angled, accessible position while encasing their sharp edges. We are enthusiastic about adding the Safe Receptacle for Sharps device to our product line and believe that it is a complimentary technology to our NeedleZap® product. By expanding our future product line, we hope to bring added value to the sales and distribution channel we are building. However, we are not presently pursuing the sharps receptacle as management believes resources should be conserved for marketing the currently approved product.

Recent Events

In March 2006, we entered into a manufacturing and distribution agreement with One World Sourcing, LLC for the manufacture and distribution of the NeedleZap® device in the Peoples Republic of China. The contract calls for royalty payments on all sales of the device in China. Approvals have been secured for sale of the device in China. Additionally, approval of our patent for the NeedleZap® device in the Republic of China has been received and is expected to be finalized in June 2006. A prototype unit is to be furnished to us in May 2006 for testing and approval. Initial orders have been placed for deliver in the fall of 2006 subject to customer approval.

Distribution of Our Products

In December 2004, we appointed Moscow, Russia-based Actual Medical Supplies (“AMS”) our exclusive distributor of NeedleZap® products in the Russian Federation and the 14 other countries that make up the Commonwealth of Independent States. AMS has obtained a registration certificate from the Russian Federation’s Federal Service of Health Care and Social Development Control necessary to sell the NeedleZap® in Russia and has placed an order for 10,000 units. The Russian Federation alone has a population of 145 million people and we believe the Commonwealth of Independent States is a potentially significant market for our

 

2


Table of Contents

products. The Russian Federation, Department of Health required an approval process for the product to be sold in Russia. That approval was granted on January 5, 2005 and is effective for ten years.

In July 2004 we entered into a manufacturing and distribution license agreement with Providers International LLC for the manufacture and distribution of the NeedleZap® device in the Peoples Republic of China and Australia. The contract called for a minimum royalty to be paid to us of $810,000 by December 31, 2004, which was not received. The agreement was terminated in August 2005 for non-performance by Providers International, Inc.

In April 2002, we entered into distribution contracts with American Health & Safety Products, Inc., and its wholly owned subsidiary, AHSP International L.L.C., which have representation in the United States, Europe, South America, Central America and Canada. AHSP informed us in March 2006 that they were discontinuing their business operations and the contract terminated pursuant to its terms.

In January 2004 the NeedleZap® device underwent extensive testing at Fort Drum, New York. We received the report and evaluation of the NeedleZap® in November 2004. The testing showed the device was suitable for “brick and mortar” type hospital settings, but changes to make the device more durable are necessary for field applications. Based on these test results, we immediately targeted the veteran hospitals as a potential market and will begin modifying the NeedleZap® to make it more durable for field applications. We were added to the VA schedule in November 2005.

Global Marketing Group, our distribution partner in Africa, is currently working with Ugandan-based Lily Pharmacy (U) Ltd. to market NeedleZap® to hospitals, clinics and pharmacies throughout Uganda. Since 1974, Lily has been importing pharmaceuticals and medical supplies for wholesale and retail distribution. Lily Pharmacy is not affiliated with Eli Lilly and Company. Lily Pharmacy has numerous marketing activities underway to expand the use of NeedleZap® in Uganda and Rwanda. In August 2004, four representatives of Global Marketing and E Med visited Uganda where the product has been in use in 22 hospitals for over one year. The feedback from these hospitals and the Public Health Department in Uganda has been positive. In a letter dated September 21, 2004, Dr. Mubiru, Director of Health Services in Kampala, Uganda stated that the NeedleZap® device “provides the best solution” the transmission of diseases through needlestick injuries. We believe Africa represents a large market potential for our product and have targeted several non-profit organizations to assist in funding the supply of product for Africa. In November 2004 we participated with Global Marketing in a presentation in Washington, D.C. to several African ambassadors and have received positive feedback on the NeedleZap®.

We entered into a license and distribution agreement with ITDevelopment Solutions, Inc. (“IDS”) granting IDS the exclusive right to manufacture, distribute and sell our NeedleZap® unit in Pakistan and the United Arab Emirates in September 2004. We cancelled the agreement on July 28, 2005 for IDS’s non-performance.

 

3


Table of Contents

Research and Development

In 2005, our research and development costs were $6,114 compared to $550 in 2004. We hope to increase our R&D budget in 2006. In addition, to supplement our own R&D efforts, we are working with other organizations to identify and develop improvements for the existing product line and new products that would be compatible with our existing product line for possible acquisition.

Patents and Trademarks

Patents and trademarks are critical in the medical device industry. We believe strongly in protecting our intellectual property and received final approval for our U.S patent in March 2006 in connection with our NeedleZap® product line, and have registered the “NeedleZap” trademark. Our Medical Safety Technologies subsidiary’s Safe Receptacle for Sharps is also protected by a U.S. patent. We are in the process of amending our current patent application in the United States to include additional claims for our product. In 2004, our NeedleZap® patent was issued and published in the Peoples Republic of China. Final approval has been granted for our patent in the Peoples Republic of China effective June 22, 2006. We also rely upon trade secrets and proprietary know-how. We intend to aggressively enforce our intellectual property rights if necessary. However, our intellectual property rights may not provide us with any significant degree of protection from our competitors. Please turn to “Competition” below for additional information about competition in our business.

We do not believe that our products infringe on the intellectual property rights of others and we are not aware of anyone presently infringing on our rights. However, infringements that we are unaware of may exist now or may arise in the future. There has been substantial litigation regarding patent and other intellectual property rights in the medical device industry. Litigation may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property rights or to defend E Med against claimed infringement of the rights of others. Any litigation would be costly and time consuming, and an adverse determination could subject us to significant liability or require us to seek licenses from third parties to allow us to continue to sell our products.

Royalty Agreement

We acquired the NeedleZap® technology from NeedleZap Partners in exchange for shares of our stock and a royalty of $5.00 for every NeedleZap® unit we sell until five million units are sold. Additionally, we have agreed to pay $1.00 per unit sold which will be divided amongst two of our officers and our director of research and development. For additional information about these royalty arrangements, please see Note J of our financial statements at page F-13. This fee has been temporarily waived until E Med becomes profitable.

Employees

We have one full-time employee, our CEO/CFO. We presently out-source manufacturing and other key aspects of our business. We plan to add additional personnel as our growth warrants and revenue allows.

 

4


Table of Contents

Principal Suppliers

We have contracted with Frantz Medical Development Ltd. to manufacture our products in the United States. Frantz Medical has been approved by the FDA to manufacture NeedleZap® units. We have entered into a manufacturing and distribution license agreement with One World Sourcing LLC for the manufacture and distribution of the NeedleZap® device in the Peoples Republic of China. One World Sourcing is not currently an FDA approved manufacturer and products manufactured by One World Sourcing may not be sold in the United States. In addition to Frantz Medical, we believe that there are a number of domestic manufacturers with whom we could subcontract the manufacturing of our products at competitive rates who would also satisfy applicable quality assurance standards.

Our products are primarily comprised of ABS plastic, batteries, wiring, copper electrodes and aluminum. All of these materials and components are readily available from numerous suppliers at competitive pricing.

Competition

The medical waste disposal sector is highly competitive and is presently dominated by Baxter International, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Kimberly-Clark, Steri-Cycle, Waste Management, BMI and other large suppliers who manufacture and sell medical waste disposal system products that store, and in some instances, treat certain contaminated medical instruments until removed for further treatment, but do not themselves decontaminate the instruments. There are generally substantial disposal costs associated in connection with contaminated products.

Our strategy is to develop a niche market within the industry through our ability to destroy commonly used syringes with a product that is both portable and relatively inexpensive — the NeedleZap® unit. We believe these factors distinguish our product from the generally less portable and substantially more expensive products offered by our competitors. In addition, we believe the patent pending status of NeedleZap® together with the application and review time necessary for FDA approval of any similar competitive device should provide us with a competitive advantage, at least for a period of time. Of course, we cannot guaranty that these advantages will allow us to compete successfully or that one of our competitors will not develop a superior product. This is especially true given that many of our competitors are larger, have significantly greater resources, and broader product lines than we do.

Governmental Regulations

Because we manufacture and sell medical devices, our products, packaging and manufacturing procedures are subject to regulations by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Department of Health and Human Services and similar state agencies. Medical devices are classified into three regulatory categories (Classes I, II and III). The amount of regulation varies dependant upon the classification. NeedleZap® is an FDA class III device. Because these types of devices are relatively new to the marketplace they are subject to the highest level of regulation. The FDA has reviewed and approved NeedleZap® (PMA P010065) for sale in the United States.

Our products are also subject to regulation in foreign countries. For example, NeedleZap® is considered an EU Class I medical device and must qualify for and bear the “CE Mark” in

 

5


Table of Contents

European Union countries. Depending upon the distribution relationships established to market our products in countries other than the United States, we may be responsible for obtaining approval to sell in those countries.

In addition to the regulatory framework for product approvals, we are subject to regulation under federal and state laws, including requirements regarding occupational safety, environmental protection and hazardous substance control. We are not aware of any specific environmental liabilities that we would incur in connection with our business. Our sales and marketing practices are subject to regulation by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, pursuant to federal anti-kickback laws, and are also subject to similar state laws.

We have devoted substantial financial and human resources to comply with these extensive regulations by the FDA and other government agencies and will continue to do so in the future. If we failed to comply with applicable regulations we would be subject to administrative and criminal actions, which would likely significantly impair our business. Our operations may also be negatively impacted if the United States. or state governments or the governments of other countries where we market our products pass new legislation or if courts issue new rulings with respect to existing legislation governing our products. Continued compliance with regulatory requirements is likely to be costly.

Forward Looking Statements

Some of the statements that we make in this report, including statements about our confidence in E Med’s prospects and strategies and our expectations about E Med’s sales expansion, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of § 21E of the Securities Exchange Act. Some of these forward-looking statements can be identified by words like “believe,” “expect,” “will,” “should,” “intend,” “plan,” or similar terms; others can be determined by context. Statements contained in this report that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements. These statements are necessarily estimates reflecting our best judgment based upon current information, and involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Many factors could affect the accuracy of these forward-looking statements, causing our actual results to differ significantly from those anticipated in these statements. While it is impossible to identify all applicable risks and uncertainties, they include:

 

  our ability to execute our business plan;

 

  our ability to successfully market and sell our products;

 

  our ability to gain and retain market share from our competitors, many of whom have greater financial and other resources than we do;

 

  the introduction of competing products by other companies;

 

  our ability to protect our patents, copyrights and other intellectual property rights;

 

  pressure on pricing from our competitors or customers;

 

  continued availability of components for our products and stability in the cost of these components;

 

6


Table of Contents
  our reliance on subcontractors to manufacture our products;

 

  our reliance on independent distributors to market and sell our products;

 

  our financial resources are limited and we are dependant on increasing sales to generate cash for operations;

 

  our ability to continue to comply with rules and regulations governing our products; and

 

  our ability to comply with SEC regulations and filing requirements applicable to us as a public company.

You should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements, which reflect our analysis only as of the date of this report. The risks and uncertainties listed above and elsewhere in this report and other documents that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our annual report on Form 10-KSB, quarterly reports on Form 10-QSB, and any current reports on Form 8-K, must be carefully considered by any investor or potential investor in E Med.

How to Learn More About E Med

We file annual, quarterly and special reports and other information with the SEC. Our SEC filings are available to the public on the internet at the SEC’s web site at SEC.gov. You may also read and copy any document we have filed at the SEC’s public reference room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the SEC’s public reference room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. To learn more about E Med you can also contact us directly at the address or phone number listed below or visit our website at NeedleZap.com.

E Med Future, Inc.

794 Morrison Road

Suite 911

Columbus, Ohio 43230

Phone: 330-674-1363

Email: info@NeedleZap.com

Item 2. Description of Property.

We lease approximately 500 square feet of office and our primary warehouse space in Columbus, Ohio from a company owned by one of our directors for $1,800 a month. For additional information regarding this arrangement, please turn to “Lease with Ochsendorf Company” at page 15.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

In April 2004, we entered into a distribution and marketing agreement with TransGlobal Medical Sales & Services, LLC of Orlando, Florida. TransGlobal was to serve as an international distribution arm for our products and was required to purchase and pay for 10,000 NeedleZap®

 

7


Table of Contents

units within 90 days of the execution of the agreement. When we had not received payment for the units nearly two and one half months past the due date, we notified TransGlobal on October 19, 2004 of the material breach and that we were terminating our agreement. TransGlobal failed to cure its breach and on December 13, 2004 we filed a lawsuit against TransGlobal captioned E Med Future, Inc. v. Transglobal Medical Sales & Services, LLC, Robert Sullivan, and Martin Boelens, Case No. 04CVH-12-13068 (Court of Common Please, Franklin County, Ohio). In our complaint we alleged causes of action for breach of contract, fraud, rescission against defendants for failure to pay us $560,000 due under our agreement with TransGlobal, and TransGlobal’s failure to perform other terms of the contract. In February 2005, Messrs. Boelens and Sullivan filed their amended answers denying our allegations, and TransGlobal filed its amended answer and amended counterclaim. In its counterclaim, TransGlobal alleges causes of action against E Med for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, tortious interference with business relations and contract rights, and failure to account. TransGlobal alleges that E Med breached the contract, took opportunities to which TransGlobal allegedly was entitled, and breached an agreement under which TransGlobal allegedly was entitled to receive four million shares of E Med stock. TransGlobal seeks damages in excess of $25,000, an accounting for present and future lost revenue, unspecified consequential damages, and prejudgment and post-judgment interest. In March 2005, we filed our reply denying all the allegations in the counterclaim. Discovery and depositions have been completed. E Med is vigorously prosecuting our complaint and defending the counterclaim, including filing a motion for summary judgment, which the court granted in part and denied in part in March 2006. A trial date has not yet been set.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5. Market For Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Small Business Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Our common stock is currently traded on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board (“OTCBB”) under the trading symbol “EMDF.OB.” The following table lists the high and low closing sale prices of our common stock during 2005 as reported on OTCBB. These sale prices reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission, and may not represent actual transactions.

 

     High    Low

Fourth Quarter

   $ 0.09    $ 0.05

Third Quarter

   $ 0.13    $ 0.04

Second Quarter

   $ 0.28    $ 0.07

First Quarter

   $ 0.51    $ 0.19

There were approximately 1,560 stockholders of record of the Company’s common stock as of March 31, 2006. We estimate that an additional 500 stockholders own stock in their accounts at brokerage firms and other financial institutions.

 

8


Table of Contents

We intend to reinvest our earnings, if any, in the business, and have never declared or paid, and do not intend to declare or pay, any cash dividends on our stock.

Item 6. Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation.

We manufacture and market products designed to reduce accidental hypodermic needlestick injuries. Our primary product, NeedleZap®, completely disintegrates the sharp portion of the needle. Please turn to “Our Products” at page 1 for a more detailed discussion of our product line. There are an estimated one million accidental needlesticks reported in the United States in the healthcare industry alone, and we believe the applications for our products are far reaching. NeedleZap® is designed to work within the parameters of recent OSHA needlestick mandates which require employers to take advantage of new technologies to prevent needlesticks in the workplace. We also believe there is a potential global market in developed as well as developing countries. For example, NeedleZap® could be a component in the fight against AIDS in many African countries where the disease is endemic. For additional information about our global marketing efforts, please see “Distribution of Our Products” at page 2.

Looking Ahead

We incurred net losses in 2002, 2003 and 2004 while we obtained FDA approval for our NeedleZap® product, applied for patent protection and entered into distribution relationships. We have not had significant sales volume to date. We believe we have now obtained significant experience in how to market our products effectively and we had a small increase in sales in 2005, which were less than projected. Our sales to date in 2006 and firm orders exceed 2005 sales volumes substantially. Of course, we cannot guarantee that sales will increase or that we will be able to attain profitability.

Background

In December 2001, we filed a pre-market approval application, or PMA, with The Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for NeedleZap®. On the basis of counsel’s advice, we determined that NeedleZap® was not regulated by the CDRH as a medical device in veterinarian or law enforcement applications. Therefore, we opted to market NeedleZap® in the United States to veterinarians and law enforcement professionals. Revenues generated from these sales would offset the costly and lengthy FDA approval process and provide funding for promotion, tooling, parts and the overall operations.

In July 2002, we received an approvable letter from the FDA stating that NeedleZap® met all the requirements for the safety and effectiveness data testing for a Class III medical device. The approvable letter was subject to an FDA inspection that found the manufacturing facilities, methods and controls in compliance with the applicable requirements of FDA quality system regulation. During the manufacturing inspectional phase in August 2002, the FDA requested that we suspend all sales to veterinarian and law enforcement markets until the product was fully approved. We voluntarily complied with the FDA’s request and suspended all sales in U.S. markets and issued a recall for all units sold in the United States. In April 2004, we had recovered all devices that were sold prior to FDA approval and the FDA issued a letter terminating the recall in July 2004. The expense of this recall is reflected in the 2004 financials.

 

9


Table of Contents

On March 14, 2003, the FDA issued a final approval order letter for NeedleZap®. Final labeling was submitted and approved on March 19, 2003, clearing the way to market NeedleZap® in the United States in healthcare facilities and treatment settings.

Results of Operations

We are a development stage company and did not have full approval to market and sell our products until March 2003. Initial sales in 2003 caused us to be optimistic that our revenues and profits would increase in 2004 and subsequent years. We were disappointed when our 2004 and 2005 results did not meet expectations due to lower than anticipated sales.

Net Sales

We had net sales of $120,509 in 2005, compared with $118,507 in 2004, an increase of $2,002 or 1.7%. This increase is primarily attributable to increased selling prices.

Costs and Expenses

Operating costs and expenses increased $954,670, or 78.8%, to $2,165,515 in 2005 from $1,210,845 in 2004. The increase was primarily caused by a substantial increase in stock based compensation and charges against operations for impairment of inventory, patents and tooling required by accounting rules. Selling, general and administrative expense decreased but only partially offset the stock based compensation and impairment charges.

Other expenses increased to $53,157 in 2005 from $25,218 in 2004, due to an increase in interest expense resulting from higher balances outstanding on our debt in 2005.

Net Loss

In 2005, our net loss increased to $2,098,163, or $0.06 a share, from a net loss of $1,117,556, or $0.04 a share, in 2004, as slightly higher sales combined with substantially increased costs.

Selected Financial Data

The following table includes selected financial information for 2005 and 2004. Please turn to our audited financial statements beginning at page F-1, including the accompanying footnotes, for additional information.

 

     Year Ended December 31     Increase (Decrease)  
     2005     2004     Dollars     Percentage  

Net sales

   $ 120,509     $ 118,507     $ 2,002     1.7 %

Net (loss)

     (2,098,163 )     (1,117,556 )     980,607     87.7 %

Net (loss) per share

     (0.06 )     (0.04 )     (0.02 )   (50.0 )%

Total assets

     151,364       1,570,957       (1,419,593 )   (90.4 )%

Stockholders’ equity (deficit)

     (1,167,942 )     464,821       (1,632,763 )   (351.2 )%

 

10


Table of Contents

Financial Condition and Liquidity

We had no available cash on December 31, 2005, compared to $2,810 at the end of 2004. The decrease is primarily the result of our operating loss. Cash used in operations decreased 83.1% to $112,755 in 2005 from $665,642 in 2004, primarily due to decreased inventory and increases in accounts payable and accrued liabilities.

On November 12, 2002, we entered into a credit facility with Key Bank (NA). The facility provides us with a working capital line-of-credit of up to $150,000 and currently bears interest at 7.5%. The credit facility is secured by all of E Med’s assets and must be paid back in full on demand. We presently have drawn $149,098 on the facility.

In 2003, our director of research purchased an existing $215,585 loan and advanced additional funds bringing total funds advanced to $320,585. In the first half of 2004, we repaid a portion of this loan, reducing the outstanding balance to $266,484 at June 30, 2004. We repaid this loan in full as of June 30 by the issuance of 794,415 unregistered shares of our common stock to the note holder.

On April 1, 2004, we entered into a loan agreement with a private investor in the amount of $750,000. The convertible promissory note bears interest at 7.5% payable quarterly with the principal due in five years and is secured by all of our assets. The note is convertible at the holder’s option into 1.5 million shares of our unregistered common stock, subject to adjustment for dilutive issuances. Proceeds from the loan will be used for inventory and operating expenses. In connection with the loan, we also agreed to pay the lender a $3.00 royalty on each of the next 1.0 million NeedleZap® units, with maximum total royalty payments of $5.0 million. For additional information regarding the loan please see Note L of our attached financial statements at page F-13. The loan agreement was amended effective December 31, 2004 to reduce the loan amount to $548,000. Payment of interest and royalties was deferred until January 1, 2006, provided we provide monthly sales reports to the lender when due. In addition, if we arrange an increase in bank financing, the lender agreed to subordinate its security interests to the secured interests of the banking institution up to a maximum of $500,000. The lender had advanced $575,000 of the loan proceeds directly to PR Market Research Company, our primary vendor, without our approval. Please turn to “PR Market Research” at page 16 for more information about PR Market Research. The reduced loan amount consists of $175,000 received by us from the lender and $373,000 that we owed to PR Market Research for parts and services that was assigned to the lender

Our primary need for capital is to fund operations and the development of new products. Historically, our capital requirements have been met by a combination of loans from stockholders, our line of credit with Key Bank, and funds from operations. Now that we have obtained FDA approval for NeedleZap® and our distributors have had sufficient ramp-up time, we expect increased sales to meet our capital needs. In addition, we are developing new NeedleZap® products to help generate additional revenues. However, sales may not be adequate to meet our cash needs, which would negatively impact our operations and development of new and ancillary products. For an overview of the risks we face, please turn to “Forward Looking Statements” on page 6.

 

11


Table of Contents

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any material off-balance sheet arrangements.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our independent auditors’ report contains a “going concern” note. In Note C of our financial statements the auditors point out that we have incurred net losses that raise “substantial concerns” about our ability to continue as a going concern. For more information, please turn to our audited financial statement beginning on page F-1 and Note C in particular on page F-10. Although we recognize that we have incurred significant losses while in the development phase, now that we have obtained FDA approval for NeedleZap® and begun developing our distribution channels we are confident about our prospects. Of course, we cannot guaranty that we will be able to successfully attain sustained profitability.

For a discussion of additional significant accounting policies that impact our financial reporting, please turn to Note B of our financial statements beginning on page F-7.

Item 7. Financial Statements.

Our 2005 and 2004 consolidated financial statements audited by Meyler & Company, LLC follow this annual report beginning on page F-1.

Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

Not applicable.

Item 8A. Controls and Procedures.

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding the required disclosures. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, we recognize that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.

As of December 31, 2005, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the chief executive and financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon

 

12


Table of Contents

that evaluation, the chief executive and financial officer concluded that information required to be disclosed in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that this information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive and financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding the required disclosures.

Item 8B. Other Information

Not applicable.

PART III

Item 9. Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons; Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.

Our directors and executive officers are:

Donald Sullivan, age 63, was appointed E Med’s chief financial officer in November 2004, a director in July 2005 and interim CEO in September 2005. Prior to joining E Med, from January through October 2004, Mr. Sullivan was employed as vice president and chief financial officer of Capital Furniture Works, Inc., a furniture manufacturer. From 1998 through 2003, Mr. Sullivan was the owner of Danville Pallet Co., a wooden pallet manufacturer. Previously, Mr. Sullivan was employed for approximately 20 years by Castle Nursing Homes, Inc. in various capacities, including president, secretary, treasurer and chief financial officer. Mr. Sullivan was licensed as a certified public accountant in 1967 and worked for over 10 years as a partner in various CPA firms.

Ronald L. Alexander, age 56, is an original E Med investor and has served as a director since July 2005. Mr. Alexander currently owns and operates several businesses, including funeral homes and a hospital bed sale and rental company.

Committees of the Board

We are still in the early stages of our business plan and have not yet realized significant revenues. Because we are still in the start-up phase, our board consists of only two directors — Mr. Sullivan, who also serves as our chief financial officer and interim chief executive officer, and Mr. Alexander. Because of the small size of our board, the directors have not designated audit, nominating or other committees. Instead, these responsibilities are handled by the entire board. Without an audit committee, we do not presently have a director that qualifies as “an audit committee financial expert” under SEC rules. Although we are pleased with the diverse skills and level of expertise that our directors possess, we hope to attract additional independent members to sit on our board in the future as our business grows.

 

13


Table of Contents

Code of Ethics

In the wake of the recent corporate scandals, the SEC has adopted rules encouraging companies to adopt written ethical guidelines for their officers and employees. We believe strongly in the importance of ethical conduct in our business endeavors, and on January 1, 2004, our board of directors unanimously adopted a code of conduct and ethics that applies to all of our officers, directors and employees, including our principal executive officer and principal financial and principal accounting officer. A copy of our code is attached to our 2003 Form 10-KSB filed with the SEC on March 30, 2004.

Compliance with § 16(a) of the Exchange Act

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock, to make filings with the SEC reporting their ownership of our common stock and to furnish us with copies of these filings. In 2005, D. Dane Donohue, our former President and CEO, Robert J. Ochsendorf and Juan J. Perez, both former directors, and Mr. Sullivan each failed to timely file a Form 4 reporting an acquisition of shares. The Form 4s were subsequently filed. Based solely on our review of copies of reports furnished to us, we believe that all other § 16(a) filing requirements were met in 2004. Copies of these filings are available on the SEC’s website at SEC.gov or our website at NeedleZap.com.

Item 10. Executive Compensation.

D. Dane Donohue resigned as our president and chief executive officer on September 12, 2005 and our board appointed Donald Sullivan to serve as interim president and CEO. Mr. Sullivan has been E Med’s chief financial officer since November 2004. The table below summarizes Messrs. Sullivan and Donohue’s compensation in 2005. None of our officers or employees has an employment or severance contract or similar agreement with the Company.

 

     Salary     Share Grants     Other  

Donald Sullivan

   $ 43,500 (1)   $ 65,000 (2)     —    

D. Dane Donohue

   $ 45,000 (3)     —       $ 7,587 (4)

(1) Accrued in 2005 but not paid.
(2) On January 15, 2005, E Med issued Mr. Sullivan 500,000 common shares valued at $0.13 a share.
(3) $15,000 of Mr. Donohue’s salary was paid in 2005; the remainder was accrued but not paid.
(4) Represents car and insurance expenses.

Director Compensation

Our directors do not receive cash compensation for serving on our board. Although we have no formal equity compensation plan for our board members, in 2005 we issued a total of 2.0 million shares to our board members for their services as officers and directors.

Equity Compensation Plans

On December 20, 2004, our board adopted the E Med Future, Inc. 2004 Stock Option Plan. The stock plan provides for the issuance of up to 10.0 million shares of our common stock or options to purchase shares and is administered by the board. The purpose of the plan is to encourage and enable our officers, directors, employees and consultants, upon whose judgment, initiative and

 

14


Table of Contents

efforts we largely depend for the successful conduct of our business, to acquire a proprietary interest in E Med. We believe that providing these individuals with a direct stake in E Med’s welfare will assure a closer identification of their interests with those of the Company, thereby stimulating their efforts on the Company’s behalf and strengthening their desire to remain with the Company.

Item 11. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

The following table lists the stock ownership of all stockholders who beneficially own more that 5% of our stock as well as our executive officers and directors as of March 31, 2006.

 

Significant Stockholders

   Shares    Percentage  

D. Dane Donohue

131 Timmerman Road

Mansfield, Ohio 44903

   2,500,000    7.6 %

Robert J. Ochsendorf

794 Morrison Road

Columbus, Ohio 43230

   3,000,000    9.2 %

PR Market Research Company*

16738 Maryann Furnace Road

Nashport, Ohio 43830

   2,500,000    7.6 %
Officers and Directors      

Ronald L. Alexander**

794 Morrison Road

Columbus, Ohio 43230

   759,500    2.3 %

Donald Sullivan

794 Morrison Road

Columbus, Ohio 43230

   500,000    1.5 %
           

All executive officers and directors as a group

   1,259,500    3.8 %
           

 


* PR Market Research is owned by Kenneth Jackson, our director of research.
** Mr. Alexander’s wife owns 21,000 of these shares. Mr. Alexander is the sole shareholder of Alexander Funeral Homes, Inc., which owns 68,358 shares, Personal Touch, Inc., which owns 15,000 shares, and Holmes County Memorial Inc., which owns 8,000 shares.

 

15


Table of Contents

Item 12. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.

Lease with Ochsendorf Company

We have an informal lease arrangement with E.R. Ochsendorf Company, a company owned by Robert J. Ochsendorf, our former chief executive and director, to pay $1,800 per month, or $21,600 a year, for office and warehouse space in Columbus, Ohio. We have paid only a portion of the rent to date, and accrued the remainder. In 2004 we paid $7,200 in rent. In 2005 we didn’t make any rent payments for our Columbus facility and had $27,000 in accrued rent as of December 31, 2005. The Oschendorf Company stopped charging us rent for our space in Columbus in August 2005. The lease is month to month and is not covered by a written agreement.

Supply Arrangement with Ochsendorf Company

Mr. Ochsendorf’s company also provides us with supplies, boxes, labels and shipping services. E.R. Ochsendorf Company billed us $835 in 2005 and $10,382 in 2004 for these services.

Royalty Agreements with Officers

We have agreed to pay a royalty of $1.00 for every NeedleZap® unit sold which will be divided amongst D. Dane Donohue, our former chief executive officer and director, Mr. Ochsendorf, and our director of research and development. They have agreed to temporarily waive this fee until E Med is profitable.

Loans from Employees and Directors

In 2003, our director of research purchased an existing $215,585 loan to E Med from another of our employees and advanced additional funds bringing total funds advanced to $320,585. In the first half of 2004, we repaid a portion of this loan, reducing the outstanding balance to $266,484 at June 30, 2004. We repaid this loan in full as of June 30, 2004 by the issuance of 794,415 unregistered shares of our common stock to the note holder.

Ronald L. Alexander loaned us $101,000 in 2005 and $25,000 in 2004. The loan does not bear interest and is not represented by a note. Mr. Alexander joined our board of directors in July 2005.

PR Market Research

PR Market Research Company is owned by Kenneth Jackson, our director of research, and is a significant shareholder. The company is an FDA approved vendor and supplies E Med with the majority of its component parts used in the manufacture of NeedleZap® units. It also furnishes packaging materials and other manufacturing supplies and has from time to time paid operating expenses for us. PR Market Research did not bill us anything in 2005 and billed us $226,633 in 2004.

Representation by Perez & Morris

In 2004, we engaged Perez & Morris LLC to represent us in an action against TransGlobal Medical. Perez & Morris is a Columbus, Ohio-based law firm co-founded by Juan J. Perez, a former member of our board of directors. This engagement was accepted for a fixed fee consisting of 250,000 shares of our common stock, plus expenses, which management believes is comparable to normal charges in the industry for similar services.

 

16


Table of Contents

Item 13. Exhibits.

 

2.1   Agreement and Plan of Merger dated April 2, 2003 by and among Micro-Economics, Inc., E Med Sub, Inc. and E Med Future, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 11, 2003 (Reg. No. 033-55254))
2.2   Agreement and Plan of Acquisition by and between Medical Safety Technologies, Inc., UTEK Corporation and E Med Future, Inc. dated December 20, 2003 (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 14, 2004 (Reg. No. 033-55254))
3(i)(1)   Articles of Incorporation of the Company (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 2, 1992 (Reg. No. 033-55254))
3(i)(2)   Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of the Company filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on January 29, 2003 (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB dated March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 22, 2003 (Reg. No. 033-55254))
3(i)(3)   Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of the Company filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on April 4, 2003 (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB dated March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 22, 2003 (Reg. No. 033-55254))
3(ii)(1)   Bylaws of the Company (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 2, 1992 (Reg. No. 033-55254))
3(ii)(2)   Amendment No. 1 to the Bylaws of the Company (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 (Reg. No. 033-55254))
4.1   Form of Consulting and Subscription Agreement (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 12, 2003 (Reg. No. 333-105151))
10.1   2004 Stock Option Plan of the Company (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 22, 2004 (Reg. No. 333-121529))

 

17


Table of Contents
10.2   License and Distribution Agreement among the Company and ITDevelopment Solutions, Inc. dated September 16, 2004 (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 20, 2004 (Reg. No. 033-55254))
14   Code of Conduct and Ethics of the Company (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 (Reg. No. 033-55254))
31   Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive and Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
32   Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*

* Filed with this annual report

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

The following table lists the aggregate fees billed for professional audit services provided to us by Meyler & Company, LLC, our principal accountants, for the audit of our 2005 and 2004 annual financial statements and for other services rendered.

 

     2005    2004

Audit fees

   $ 15,000    $ 20,000

Audit related fees

     10,500      10,500

Tax fees

     —        —  

All other fees

     —        —  
             

Total

   $ 25,500    $ 30,500
             

Because of the small size of our board, the directors have not designated an audit committee. Instead, these responsibilities are handled by the entire board, which considers and pre-approves any audit or non-audit services to be performed by Meyler & Company. Our board believes the services provided by Meyler & Company are compatible with maintaining our auditor’s independence.

 

18


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, E Med Future, Inc. caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

  E MED FUTURE, INC.
Date: May 16, 2006  

/s/ Donald Sullivan

 

Donald Sullivan, Chief Financial Officer

and interim Chief Executive Officer

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of E Med Future, Inc. and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Date: May 16, 2006  

/s/ Ronald L. Alexander

  Ronald L. Alexander, Director
Date: May 16, 2006  

/s/ Donald Sullivan

 

Donald Sullivan, Chief Financial Officer,

interim Chief Executive Officer and Director

 

19


Table of Contents

E MED FUTURE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

(A Development Stage Company)

AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005 AND 2004


Table of Contents

CONTENTS

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

   F-1

Consolidated Balance Sheets

   F-2

Consolidated Statements of Operations

   F-3

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

   F-4

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

   F-6

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

   F-7


Table of Contents

MEYLER & COMPANY, LLC

ONE ARIN PARK

1715 HIGHWAY 35

MIDDLETOWN, NJ 07748

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors

E Med Future, Inc. and Subsidiary

Columbus, Ohio

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of E Med Future, Inc. and Subsidiary (a Development Stage Company) as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2005. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of E Med Future, Inc. and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2005, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note C to the consolidated financial statements, the Company incurred net losses of $2,098,163 and $1,117,556 for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and has a negative working capital of $514,088 and Stockholders’ Deficit of $1,167,942 at December 31, 2005. These conditions raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans regarding those matters also are described in Note C. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Meyler & Company, LLC

Middletown, NJ

May 10, 2006

 

F-1


Table of Contents

E MED FUTURE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

(A Development Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

 

     December 31,  
     2005     2004  
ASSETS     

CURRENT ASSETS

    

Cash

     $ 2,810  

Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $0 and $67,744 in 2005 and 2004, respectively

   $ 16,410       2,511  

Inventory

     105,128       488,153  

Prepaid expenses

     8,400       17,713  

Current portion of prepaid compensation

       440,000  
                

Total Current Assets

     129,938       951,187  

PREPAID CONSULTING COMPENSATION

       311,667  

EQUIPMENT, net of accumulated depreciation of $9,578 and $60,932, in 2005 and 2004, respectively

     21,426       167,787  

PATENTS AND LICENSES

    

Patents, net of accumulated amortization of $46,772 in 2004

       140,316  
                
   $ 151,364     $ 1,570,957  
                
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)     

CURRENT LIABILITIES

    

Bank overdraft

   $ 365    

Notes payable to bank

     149,098     $ 141,098  

Current portion of note payable

     1,828       1,828  

Notes payable to related party

     2,000       25,000  

Accounts payable

     242,932       206,611  

Accounts payable to related party

     57,108       25,376  

Accrued expenses

     190,695       55,523  

Customer deposits

       100,000  
                

Total Current Liabilities

     644,026       555,436  

LONG-TERM DEBT

    

Note payable, less current portion

     1,280       2,700  

Notes payable to related party

     126,000    

Convertible promissory note payable

     548,000       548,000  
                

Total Long-Term Liabilities

     675,280       550,700  

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

    

Common stock $0.001 par value, 50,000,000 authorized, 32,763,415 and 29,183,415 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively

     32,763       29,183  

Paid-in-capital

     3,263,887       2,802,067  

Deficit accumulated during development stage

     (4,464,592 )     (2,366,429 )
                

Total Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

     (1,167,942 )     464,821  
                

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

   $ 151,364     $ 1,570,957  
                

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

F-2


Table of Contents

E MED FUTURE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

(A Development Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

    

For the Years Ended

December 31,

   

Period

March 14, 2000

(Inception) to

December 31, 2005

 
     2005     2004    

NET SALES

   $ 120,509     $ 118,507     $ 920,501  

COSTS AND EXPENSES:

      

Cost of goods sold

     189,171       175,372       730,401  

Selling, general and administrative

     241,376       526,269       1,635,088  

Loss due to inventory obsolescence

     225,110         225,110  

Impairment of long lived assets

     251,344         251,344  

Research and development

     6,114       550       15,547  

Consulting expense

     1,217,067       287,333       2,109,400  

Impairment of goodwill

       188,500       188,500  

Depreciation and amortization

     35,333       32,821       143,038  
                        

Total Costs and Expenses

     2,165,515       1,210,845       5,298,428  
                        

NET OPERATING LOSS

     (2,045,006 )     (1,092,338 )     (4,377,927 )

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)

      

Interest and other income

         23  

Interest expense

     (53,157 )     (25,218 )     (86,688 )
                        

Total Other Expenses

     (53,157 )     (25,218 )     (86,665 )
                        

NET LOSS

   $ (2,098,163 )   $ (1,117,556 )   $ (4,464,592 )
                        

NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE (Basic and diluted)

   $ (0.06 )   $ (0.04 )   $ (0.74 )
                        

WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING

     32,635,908       26,873,019       6,043,077  
                        

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

F-3


Table of Contents

E MED FUTURE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

(A Development Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

     For the Years Ended
December 31,
   

Period

March 14, 2000

(Inception) to

December 31, 2005

 
     2005     2004    

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES

      

Net loss

   $ (2,098,163 )   $ (1,117,556 )   $ (4,464,592 )

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:

      

Depreciation and amortization

     35,333       32,821       143,038  

Consulting expense

     1,217,067       287,333       2,109,400  

Research and development costs

         8,808  

Start-up costs

         19,177  

Amortization of prepaid expense

     9,313       14,025       39,913  

Loss on inventory obsolescence

     225,110         225,110  

Impairment of long lived assets

     251,344         251,344  

Impairment of goodwill

       188,500       188,500  

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

      

Accounts receivable

     (13,899 )     97,051       (16,410 )

Inventory

     157,915       (175,885 )     (179,223 )

Prepaid expenses and compensation

       (17,712 )     (17,712 )

Accounts payable

     36,321       (44,312 )     242,929  

Accounts payable to related party

     31,732       (41,600 )     57,108  

Accrued expenses

     135,172       11,693       190,695  

Customer deposits

     (100,000 )     100,000    
                        

Net Cash Used in Operating Activities

     (112,755 )     (665,642 )     (1,201,915 )
                        

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES

      

Purchases of property and equipment

       (59,418 )     (94,806 )
                        

Net Cash Used in Investing Activities

       (59,418 )     (94,806 )
                        

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES

      

Initial capitalization

         1,666  

Cash acquired in acquisition

         200,000  

Notes payable

     6,580       4,528       152,206  

Notes payable to related party

     103,000       (29,101 )     394,484  

Convertible promissory note payable

       548,000       548,000  
                        

Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities

     109,580       523,427       1,296,356  
                        

DECREASE IN CASH

     (3,175 )     (201,633 )     (365 )

CASH, BEGINNING OF YEAR

     2,810       204,443    
                        

CASH (OVERDRAFT), END OF YEAR

   $ (365 )   $ 2,810     $ (365 )
                        

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

F-4


Table of Contents

E MED FUTURE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

(A Development Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)

 

     For the Years Ended
December 31,
  

Period

March 14, 2000

(Inception) to

December 31, 2005

     2005    2004   

Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:

        

Interest paid

   $ 1,008    $ 25,218    $ 34,539

Supplemental Schedule of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities:

        

NeedleZap Partnership Contribution of Assets to Company

        

Inventory

         $ 151,015

Equipment

           133,912

Patent

           189,089

Issuance of common stock for consulting services and compensation

     1,217,067      1,039,000      2,256,067

Loss on inventory obsolescence

     225,110         225,110

Impairment of long lived assets

     251,344         251,344

Issuance of 1,250,000 shares valued at $0.3108 per share to acquire MSTI and allocation of purchase price to license

           188,500

Issuance of common stock in payment of loan

        266,484      266,484

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

F-5


Table of Contents

E MED FUTURE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

(A Development Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

For the Period March 14, 1990 (Inception) to December 31, 2005

 

     Common
Shares
   Common
Stock
   Paid in
Capital
   Accumulated
Deficit
    Total  

Inception, March 14, 1990 to December 31, 2000

   1,000,000    $ 1,000    $ 666    $ (1,666 )  

Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2001

              (81,917 )   $ (81,917 )
                                   

Balance December 31, 2001

   1,000,000      1,000      666      (83,583 )     (81,917 )

Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2002

              (298,709 )     (298,709 )
                                   

Balance December 31, 2002

   1,000,000      1,000      666      (382,292 )     (380,626 )

Issuance of common shares for preferred stock in reverse merger

   19,850,000      19,850      485,150        505,000  

Issuance to consultants for services rendered @ $0.15 per share

   4,000,000      4,000      596,000        600,000  

Issuance for Strategic Alliance Agreement @ $0.90 per share

   34,000      34      30,566        30,600  

Issuance of shares for acquisition of MSTI @ $0.3108 per share

   1,250,000      1,250      387,250        388,500  

Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2003

              (866,581 )     (866,581 )
                                   

Balance December 31, 2003

   26,134,000      26,134      1,499,632      (1,248,873 )     276,893  

June 30, 2004 issuance of shares @$0.3566 per share in payment of loan

   749,415      749      265,735        266,484  

September 16, 2004 issuance of shares @$0.44 per share for consulting agreement

   2,000,000      2,000      878,000        880,000  

November 5, 2004 issuance of shares @$0.53 per share for consulting services

   300,000      300      158,700        159,000  

Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2004

              (1,117,556 )     (1,117,556 )
                                   

Balance December 31, 2004

   29,183,415      29,183      2,802,067      (2,366,429 )     464,821  

January 15, 2005 issuance of 3,580,000 shares @ $0.13 per share for consulting services and employee and director compensation

   3,580,000      3,580      461,820        465,400  

Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2005

              (2,098,163 )     (2,098,163 )
                                   

Balance December 31, 2005

   32,763,415    $ 32,763    $ 3,263,887    $ (4,464,592 )   $ (1,167,942 )
                                   

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

F-6


Table of Contents

E MED FUTURE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2005 and 2004

NOTE A - BUSINESS

The Company and Nature of Business

E Med Future, Inc. and Subsidiary (the “Company”), a development stage enterprise, was organized under the laws of Delaware on August 25, 2000. The Company plans to manufacture and sell a device that can disable a hypodermic needle trademarked under the name “NeedleZap.”

Reverse Merger

In April 2004, Micro-Economics, Inc., (“Micro”), a Nevada corporation, acquired all of the Company’s outstanding convertible preferred stock by the issuance of 19,850,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock (the “Merger”). Simultaneously, Micro-Economics, Inc. changed its name to E Med Future, Inc. In connection with the Merger, the Company became a wholly owned subsidiary of Micro and the Company’s officers and directors replaced Micro’s officers and directors. Prior to the Merger, Micro was a non-operating “shell” corporation. Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission rules, the merger of a private operating company (E Med Future, Inc.) into a non-operating public shell corporation with nominal net assets (Micro) is considered a capital transaction. Accordingly, for accounting purposes, the merger has been treated as an acquisition of Micro by the Company and a recapitalization of the Company. The historical financial statements prior to December 31, 2003 are those of the Company.

NOTE B - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The company considers all highly-liquid investments, with a maturity of three months or less when purchased, to be cash equivalents.

Consolidated Financial Statements

The consolidated financial statements include the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Fair Values of Financial Instruments

The Company uses financial instruments in the normal course of business. The carrying values of cash, accounts receivable, inventory, bank overdrafts, accounts payable, accrued expenses, and customer deposits approximate their fair value due to the short-term maturities of these assets and liabilities. The carrying values of notes payable and convertible promissory note payable approximate their fair value based upon management’s estimates using the best available information.

 

F-7


Table of Contents

E MED FUTURE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

December 31, 2005 and 2004

NOTE B - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Revenue Recognition

Revenues are recorded at the time of shipment of merchandise to customers, which is the time that the price is fixed, title has been transferred, collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured and the Company has no significant obligations remaining to be performed. Certain goods are shipped to retailers on a consignment basis under which title and risk of ownership are not transferred to the retailer. Accordingly, sales are not recorded until a retail customer has purchased the goods from these retailers.

Net Loss Per Common Share

The Company computes per share amounts in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 128, “Earnings per Share.” SFAS No. 128 requires presentation of basic and diluted EPS. Basic EPS is computed by dividing the income (loss) available to Common Stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is based on the weighted-average number of shares of Common Stock and Common Stock equivalents outstanding during the periods.

Equipment and Depreciation

Equipment is stated at cost and is depreciated using the straight line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets. Routine maintenance, repairs and replacement costs are expensed as incurred and improvements that extend the useful life of the assets are capitalized. When equipment is sold or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is recognized in operations.

Patent Amortization

The Company amortizes its patent over a 15 year period.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

It is the company’s policy to provide an allowance for doubtful accounts when it believes there is a potential for non-collectibility.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method.

Advertising Costs

Advertising costs are expensed in the period incurred. Total advertising expense amounted to $2,093 and $47,447 for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and are included in Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.

 

F-8


Table of Contents

E MED FUTURE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

December 31, 2005 and 2004

NOTE B - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Stock-Based Compensation

SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” prescribes accounting and reporting standards for all stock-based compensation plans, including employee stock options, restricted stock, employee stock purchase plans and stock appreciation rights. SFAS No. 123 requires employee compensation expense to be recorded (1) using the fair value method or (2) using the intrinsic value method as prescribed by accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25”) and related interpretations with pro forma disclosure of what net income and earnings per share would have been had the Company adopted the fair value method. The Company accounts for employee stock based compensation in accordance with the provisions of APB 25. For non-employee options and warrants, the Company uses the fair value method as prescribed in SFAS 123.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeded the fair value of the assets.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 151 (“SFAS 151”), “Inventory Costs.” SFAS 151 amends the guidance in APB No. 43, Chapter 4, “Inventory Pricing,” to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage). SFAS 151 requires that those items be recognized as current period charges regardless of whether they meet the criteria of “so abnormal.” In addition, SFAS 151 requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS 151 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS 151 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 153 (“SFAS 153”), “Exchanges of Non-monetary Assets.” SFAS 153 amends the guidance in APB No. 29, “Accounting for Non-monetary Assets.” APB No. 29 was based on the principle that exchanges of non-monetary assets should be measured on the fair value of the assets exchanged. SFAS 153 amends APB No. 29 to eliminate the exception for non-monetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of non-monetary assets that do not have commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. SFAS 151 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS 153 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In December 2004, the FASB revised Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (“SFAS 123(R)”), “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” The SFAS 123(R) revision established standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services and focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based

 

F-9


Table of Contents

E MED FUTURE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

December 31, 2005 and 2004

NOTE B - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements (Continued)

payment transactions. It does not change the accounting guidance for share-based payment transactions with parties other than employees. For public entities that file as small business issuers, the revisions to SFAS 123(R) are effective as of the beginning of the first interim or annual reporting period that begins after December 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS 123(R) is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS no. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections (“SFAS No. 154”) which replaces APB Opinion No. 20, “Accounting Changes” and SFAS No. 3, “Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements-An Amendment of ABP Opinion No. 28.” SFAS No. 154 provides guidance on the accounting for and reporting of accounting changes and error corrections. Specifically, this statement requires “retrospective application” of the direct effect for a voluntary change in accounting principle to prior periods’ financial statements, if it is practical to do so. SFAS No. 154 also strictly defines the term “restatement” to mean the correction of an error revising previously issued financial statements. SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005 and are required to be adopted by the Company in the first quarter of fiscal year 2006. Although we will continue to evaluate the application of SFAS No. 154, management does not anticipate that adoption will have a material impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

NOTE C - GOING CONCERN

As indicated in the accompanying financial statements, the Company incurred net losses of $2,098,163 and $1,117,556 for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and has a negative working capital of $514,088 and Stockholders’ Deficit of $1,167,942 at December 31, 2005, and is considered a company in the development stage. Management’s plans include the raising of capital through short term financing to fund future operations and the generating of revenue through its business. Failure to raise capital, keep its products and manufacturing facilities in FDA compliance, and generate sales revenues could result in the Company having to curtail or cease operations. Additionally, even if the Company does raise sufficient capital to support its operating expenses and generate revenues, there can be no assurances that the revenue will be sufficient to enable it to develop business to a level where it will generate profits and cash flows from operations. These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. However, the accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. These financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recovery of the recorded assets or the classification of the liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

 

F-10


Table of Contents

E MED FUTURE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

December 31, 2005 and 2004

NOTE D - ACQUISITION OF MEDICAL SAFETY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

On December 30, 2003, the Company acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding stock of Medical Safety Technologies, Inc. (“MSTI”), a wholly owned subsidiary of UTEK Corporation, a publicly-held technology transfer company, in exchange for 1,250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. MSTI holds the license to a patented invention known as the Safe Receptacle for Sharps, designed to aid in the safe transport of sterile and used sharp medical instruments. The Company expects the Safe Receptacle for Sharps product to provide complimentary technology to its “NeedleZap” portable needle destruction device.

Allocation of the purchase price was as follows:

 

Value of 1,250,000 shares of common stock at $0.74 per share

   $ 925,000

Less: Write down of fair market value due to small market “float” and high market volatility of the Company’s stock

     536,500
      

Adjusted purchase price at $0.3108 per share

   $ 388,500
      

Fair value of net assets allocated as follows:

  

Cash

   $ 200,000

License

     188,500
      
   $ 388,500
      

The agreement additionally requires minimum payments and royalties as follows:

 

  (a) A license fee payment of $13,000 within 30 days of the execution of the agreement,

 

  (b) 3% of net sales of the licensed product,

 

  (c) 50% of all payments received from sublicense fees, and

 

  (d) Minimum royalties as follows: first year - nothing; second year - $5,000; third year - $7,500; fourth year - $10,000; and fifth and subsequent years $15,000 until the end of the patent life.

In 2004, the Company determined that the license was impaired and accordingly it was written off to operations.

NOTE E - INVENTORY

Inventory consists of the following at December 31, 2005 and 2004:

 

     2005    2004

Finished units

   $ 105,128    $ 308,622

Component parts

        179,531
             
   $ 105,128    $ 488,153
             

 

F-11


Table of Contents

E MED FUTURE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

December 31, 2005 and 2004

NOTE E – INVENTORY (CONTINUED)

Accounting Research Bulletin (“ARB”) No. 43, Chapter 4, “Inventory Pricing”, specifies that a departure from the cost basis of pricing inventory is required when the utility of the goods is no longer as great as its cost. The Company utilizes the lower of cost of market method when a departure from cost is required. As required by ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, Management reviewed the utility of the Company’s inventory for the year ended December 31, 2005 and determined that all raw materials inventory and a portion of finished goods inventory were required to be written down to their minimum realizable value. Accordingly, the Company recorded a loss of $225,110 in order to reduce inventory.

NOTE F - EQUIPMENT

Equipment consists of the following at December 31, 2005 and 2004:

 

     Useful Life    2005    2004

Office equipment

   3-5 years    $ 31,004    $ 31,004

Tooling and dies

   5-7 years         197,715
                
        31,004      228,719

Less accumulated depreciation

        9,578      60,932
                
      $ 21,426    $ 167,787
                

$22,861 and $20,349 of Depreciation expense is included in Depreciation and amortization on the statement of operations for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. As noted in Note H, the tooling and dies were determined to be impaired in 2005 and were written off.

NOTE G – PATENTS AND LICENSES

Patents and licenses consist of the following at December 31, 2004:

 

Patent

   $ 187,088  

Less accumulated amortization

     (46,772 )
        
     140,316  

$12,472 of Amortization expense is included in Depreciation and amortization on the statement of operations for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. As noted in Note H, the patent was determined to be impaired in 2005 and was written off.

NOTE H – IMPAIRMENT OF LONG LIVED ASSETS

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long Lived Assets” required the Company to test long lived assets for impairment when conditions arise which indicate that the carrying amount of long lived assets may not be recoverable. As such, the Company tested its long lived assets for impairment based upon the fact that the Company had current-period operating and cash flow losses combined with the Company’s history of operating and cash flow

 

F-12


Table of Contents

E MED FUTURE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

December 31, 2005 and 2004

NOTE H – IMPAIRMENT OF LONG LIVED ASSETS (Continued)

losses. In assessing impairment, the Company considered its patent and the tooling equipment as an asset group as they both relate to the production and sales of Needle Zap units. Based upon the Company’s projections of future cash flows relating to this asset group, the Company determined that this asset group was impaired. The Company thus recorded an impairment loss of $251,344 for the December 31, 2005. This impairment loss consisted of the carrying amount of $123,500 in tooling and dies included within Fixed Assets and the carrying amount of $127,844 relating to the patent.

NOTE I - SHORT TERM BORROWING

The Company has a $150,000 line of credit from a local bank of which $902 was available at December 31, 2005. The loan is secured by the assets of the Corporation and is personally guaranteed by three major shareholders of the Company. The current annual interest rate is 7.75%. The average annual borrowing rate approximated 6.20%. The balance due was $149,098 and $141,098 at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

NOTE J - ROYALTY AGREEMENT

The Company has a royalty arrangement with NeedleZap General Partnership. The agreement requires a $5 royalty on each unit sold up to five million units regardless of how long it takes the Company to sell the units. Additionally, the Company has agreed to pay $1.00 per unit sold to be divided between two officers of the Company and the Director of Research and Development. This fee has been temporarily waived until the Company becomes profitable.

 

NOTE K - INCOME TAXES

The Company follows Financial Accounting Statement No. 109 (“SFAS No. 109”). Under this method, the Company recognizes a deferred tax liability or asset for temporary differences between the tax basis of an asset or liability and the related amount reported on the financial statements. The principal types of differences, which are measured at the current tax rates, are net operating loss carry forwards. At December 31, 2005, these differences resulted in a deferred tax asset of approximately $629,000. SFAS No. 109 requires the establishment of a valuation allowance to reflect the likelihood of realization of deferred tax assets. Since realization is not assured, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance for the entire deferred tax asset, and the accompanying financial statements do not reflect any net asset for deferred taxes at December 31, 2005. The valuation allowance increased by $278,000 and $264,000 in the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

The Company’s net operating loss carry forwards amounted to approximately $1,967,000 at December 31, 2005 and will expire between 2018 and 2020.

NOTE L - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Accounts payable to related party represents amounts payable to a supplier owned by the former President of the Company. Additionally, a company owned by the former President provides warehouse and office space to the Company on a month to month basis at the rate of $1,800 per month. In August of 2005, the company owned by the former President stopped charging the Company rent. The amounts due to the related party at December 31, 2005 and 2004 are $39,217 and $25,376, respectively. The Company also owes $2,153 at December 31, 2005 to a law firm in which a former Director is a partner.

 

F-13


Table of Contents

E MED FUTURE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

December 31, 2005 and 2004

NOTE L - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Continued)

Notes payable to Related Party is a note payable to a Director of the Company. This note is non-interest bearing.

During the year ended December 31, 2002, an employee advanced the Company $215,585. The loan carried no interest and had no repayment terms. Had the Company borrowed such funding from a lending institution, the imputed interest would have been approximately $4,696 based on a five percent (5%) interest rate. During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Director of Research purchased this loan for stock of the Company which he held and advanced additional funds bringing the total funds advanced to $320,585. During the six months ended June 30, 2004, the loan accrued interest of $9,399 and the Company made payments against the principal and interest of $63,500. The net loan balance, including interest at June 30, 2004, of $266,484 was converted to 749,415 shares of the Company’s common stock at an average price of $0.356 per share.

During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company had sales of $42,565 to a Company controlled by the former Director of Research of the Company.

NOTE M - NOTE PAYABLE

During 2004, the Company entered into a note payable to Ford Motor Credit payable in monthly installments of $198 including interest at 13.96%. The note is collateralized by transportation equipment. At December 31, 2005, the balance due was $3,108 of which $1,828 was current.

NOTE N - STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

In March 2003, the shareholders approved an increase in the Company’s authorized shares of common stock from 25,000,000 to 50,000,000.

On April 1, 2003, the Company, in a reverse merger, issued 19,850,000 shares of its common stock in exchange for 3,970 preferred shares of the former E-Med Future, Inc. and subsidiary valued at $505,000.

On April 21, 2003, the Company issued 4,000,000 shares of its common stock to various consultants for prior services rendered. These shares were valued at a price of $0.15 per share and reflected as stock based compensation aggregating $600,000.

On June 12, 2003, the Company issued 34,000 shares of its common stock for services to be rendered during a 12 month period commencing June 12, 2004, under a Strategic Alliance Agreement with UTEK Corporation (“UTEK”) a publicly held technology transfer company, whereby UTEK will use its best efforts to identify new technologies that could be acquired by the Company. These shares were valued at a price of $0.90 per share.

On December 30, 2003, the Company issued 1,250,000 of its common stock to acquire 100% of the outstanding stock of Medical Safety Technologies, Inc. (“MSTI”), a wholly owned subsidiary of UTEK. MSTI holds the license to a patented invention known as Safe Receptacle for Sharps, designed to aid in the safe transport of sterile and used sharp instruments. These shares were valued at a discounted market price of $0.3108.

 

F-14


Table of Contents

E MED FUTURE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

December 31, 2005 and 2004

NOTE N - STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Continued)

On June 30, 2004, the Company issued 749,415 shares of its common stock at a price of $0.3556 per share as payment of a loan payable and accrued interest in the amount of $266,484.

On September 16, 2004, the Company issued 2,000,000 shares of its common stock for consulting services to be performed through September 2006. These shares were valued at $0.44 per share for a total value of $880,000 and recorded as prepaid compensation.

On November 5, 2004, the Company issued 300,000 freely trading shares of its common stock at $0.53 per share for a total value of $159,000 for consulting services.

On January 15, 2005, the Company issued 4,830,000 shares of its common stock, pursuant to a Form S-8 filing at a value of $0.39 per share for consulting services and employee and director compensation. Consulting expense was recorded in the amount of $1,883,700 for these services. In July 2005, the Company hired a qualified valuation consultant to perform a valuation of the company stock. Based on this valuation, the shares of stock were revalued at $0.13 per share and the consulting expense was adjusted to $627,900. 1,250,000 of these shares were returned to the Company. Consulting expense relating to this transaction has therefore been adjusted to $465,400.

NOTE O - CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE

On April 1, 2004, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note agreement with an individual to lend the Company up to $750,000 of which $90,000 was in cash for working capital with the balance to be advanced to suppliers for the purchase of inventory. The note bears interest at the rate of 7.5% payable quarterly and is secured by a UCC Financing Agreement covering all of the Company’s assets. The note, at the note holder’s option, can be converted into 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. Additionally, the Company is obligated to make royalty payments as follows: On the first one million (1,000,000) units produced and sold after March 18, 2004, a payment of $3.00 per unit; on the second one million (1,000,000) units produced and sold, a payment of $2.00 per unit. Maximum aggregate royalty payments will be $5,000,000. Upon the option of the note holder to convert the note to 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, the lender would own approximately 5.555% of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares. The Company has agreed that, throughout the loan period, the note holder’s ownership interest will not be diluted through the issuance of additional stock warrants, options, convertible securities, preemption or other rights which may dilute the earning potential of the note holder’s shares. At December 31, 2005, the balance due on this note was $548,000. (See also Note S).

NOTE P - LICENSE AND DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT

On September 6, 2004, the Company entered into a license and distribution agreement with ITDevelopment Solutions, Inc. (“ITD”), granting ITD the exclusive right to manufacture, distribute and sell the NeedleZap unit in Pakistan and the United Arab Emirates. ITD has completed construction of a new high-tech manufacturing facility in Pakistan that it expects will reduce the production cost of NeedleZap by 58%. ITD bears all the new costs of the new facility as part of the arrangements. In connection with the ITD arrangement, the Company entered into a two year consulting agreement with ITD president, Patrick Downs, in which Mr. Downs agreed to perform consulting service as an independent contractor. Pursuant to the term of the agreement, Mr. Downs will render advice and assistance with respect to the development of the Pakistan manufacturing facility and will receive 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock as compensation for his services. The shares were valued at an average price of $0.44 per share of $880,000 and recorded as a prepaid consulting fee to be earned over a two year period.

 

F-15


Table of Contents

E MED FUTURE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

December 31, 2005 and 2004

NOTE P - LICENSE AND DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT (CONTINUED)

In connection with the license and manufacturing agreement, the Company is to receive 10,000 NeedleZap units without cost, $90,000 in cash within 8 weeks of the execution of the agreement and royalties for each unit sold.

In July 2005, the Company terminated its license and distribution agreement with ITD Development Solutions, Inc. (ITD). The Company has been unable to recover the shares owed by Mr. Downs. The Company has therefore written off the unamortized prepaid consulting balance of $495,000 within Stock Based Compensation in the Statement of Operations.

NOTE Q - LEASE COMMITMENTS

In 2005, the Company entered a lease agreement which expires December 31, 2006. The minimum future lease commitment is $7,200.

Total Rent expense was $13,604 and $24,082 for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004. Of these amounts, $13,200 and $21,600 were for rent due the former President of the Company (See Note L).

NOTE R - CONCENTRATION

Approximately 98% of the Company’s sales for the year ended December 31, 2005 were with four distributors. Approximately 37% of the Company sales for the year ended December 31, 2005 were with a Company controlled by the former Director of Marketing of the Company.

NOTE S - INTERNAL CONTROLS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

During the second quarter of 2004, $375,000 was paid to a company controlled by the Company’s Director of Marketing and invalid inventory was recorded with a corresponding increase in the Company’s convertible promissory note. Invalid sales totaling $379,000 were also reported. Similarly in the third quarter, $200,000 was paid to a Company controlled by the Company’s Director of Marketing and was recorded in inventory with an increase in the convertible promissory notes and an additional $312,500 in invalid sales reported. These transactions have been corrected at year end in the accompanying financial statements. The Company restated its previously issued quarterly reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

On April 13, 2004, since the funds advanced under the promissory note were not utilized for the purpose intended, the note holder adjusted the note effective December 31, 2004 and agreed to offset the invalid increases in the convertible promissory note against amounts due to the company controlled by the Director of Marketing, reducing this note to $548,000.

 

F-16