UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
| [x] |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007
OR
| |
|
|
| [ ] |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 0-21796
CDW Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| |
|
|
| Illinois
|
|
36-3310735 |
| (State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
| incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
| |
|
|
| 200 N. Milwaukee Ave.
|
|
60061 |
| Vernon Hills, Illinois
|
|
(Zip Code) |
| (Address of principal executive offices) |
|
|
(847) 465-6000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
[x] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
[x] Accelerated filer
[ ] Non-accelerated
filer [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [x]
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
As of July 25, 2007, 97,374,427 common shares were issued and 79,568,708 were outstanding.
CDW CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
ii
Part I.
Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
CDW CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
| |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
196,192 |
|
|
$ |
148,081 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
384,128 |
|
|
|
203,515 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $10,089 and $9,995, respectively |
|
|
909,162 |
|
|
|
850,002 |
|
Merchandise inventory |
|
|
290,615 |
|
|
|
261,858 |
|
Miscellaneous receivables |
|
|
46,837 |
|
|
|
55,881 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
15,047 |
|
|
|
15,060 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
18,146 |
|
|
|
15,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,860,127 |
|
|
|
1,549,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
180,110 |
|
|
|
171,448 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
119,491 |
|
|
|
119,491 |
|
Other intangible assets, net |
|
|
59,689 |
|
|
|
63,603 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
8,370 |
|
|
|
7,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,227,787 |
|
|
$ |
1,951,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
421,229 |
|
|
$ |
354,307 |
|
Accrued expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
56,411 |
|
|
|
54,301 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
42,079 |
|
|
|
4,028 |
|
Sales taxes |
|
|
17,235 |
|
|
|
20,378 |
|
Advertising |
|
|
21,866 |
|
|
|
28,775 |
|
Other |
|
|
46,249 |
|
|
|
67,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
605,069 |
|
|
|
529,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
10,524 |
|
|
|
10,762 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
24,927 |
|
|
|
24,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares, $1.00 par value; 5,000 shares authorized;
none issued |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Common shares, $.01 par value; 500,000 shares authorized;
97,361 and 96,312 shares issued, respectively |
|
|
974 |
|
|
|
963 |
|
Paid-in capital |
|
|
691,461 |
|
|
|
631,984 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
1,787,491 |
|
|
|
1,630,620 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
1,065 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,480,991 |
|
|
|
2,264,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less cost of common shares in treasury; 17,806 shares and
17,543 shares, respectively |
|
|
(893,724) |
|
|
|
(876,896) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
1,587,267 |
|
|
|
1,387,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
2,227,787 |
|
|
$ |
1,951,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
1
CDW CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
| |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
| |
Net sales |
|
$ |
2,032,838 |
|
|
$ |
1,633,458 |
|
|
$ |
3,891,956 |
|
|
$ |
3,222,087 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
1,704,851 |
|
|
|
1,369,421 |
|
|
|
3,262,650 |
|
|
|
2,704,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
327,987 |
|
|
|
264,037 |
|
|
|
629,306 |
|
|
|
517,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
172,117 |
|
|
|
126,192 |
|
|
|
326,302 |
|
|
|
254,940 |
|
Advertising expense |
|
|
32,199 |
|
|
|
30,007 |
|
|
|
61,378 |
|
|
|
60,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
123,671 |
|
|
|
107,838 |
|
|
|
241,626 |
|
|
|
202,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
5,336 |
|
|
|
5,492 |
|
|
|
9,700 |
|
|
|
10,699 |
|
Other income/(expense), net |
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
(94) |
|
|
|
(171) |
|
|
|
(1,056) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
129,241 |
|
|
|
113,236 |
|
|
|
251,155 |
|
|
|
211,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
49,150 |
|
|
|
40,125 |
|
|
|
94,284 |
|
|
|
76,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
80,091 |
|
|
$ |
73,111 |
|
|
$ |
156,871 |
|
|
$ |
134,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
1.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.93 |
|
|
$ |
1.99 |
|
|
$ |
1.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.99 |
|
|
$ |
0.91 |
|
|
$ |
1.95 |
|
|
$ |
1.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of
common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
79,103 |
|
|
|
78,994 |
|
|
|
78,856 |
|
|
|
79,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
80,995 |
|
|
|
80,564 |
|
|
|
80,621 |
|
|
|
81,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends per share |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
2
CDW CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Shareholders |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
| |
|
Equity |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Income |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
$1,387,165 |
|
|
|
$963 |
|
|
|
$631,984 |
|
|
|
$1,630,620 |
|
|
|
$(876,896) |
|
|
|
$494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
4,679 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,679 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock
under share-based
compensation plans |
|
|
41,439 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
41,428 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefit from
stock option and restricted
stock transactions |
|
|
13,370 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
13,370 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury shares |
|
|
(16,136) |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(16,136) |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock withheld
for taxes |
|
|
(692) |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(692) |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
156,871 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
156,871 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
$156,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency
translation adjustment |
|
|
571 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
571 |
|
|
|
571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$157,442 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Balance at June 30, 2007 |
|
|
$1,587,267 |
|
|
|
$974 |
|
|
|
$691,461 |
|
|
|
$1,787,491 |
|
|
|
$(893,724) |
|
|
|
$1,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
3
CDW CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
| |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
156,871 |
|
|
$ |
134,789 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
21,124 |
|
|
|
12,690 |
|
Accretion of marketable securities |
|
|
(10) |
|
|
|
(91) |
|
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
4,679 |
|
|
|
7,936 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(225) |
|
|
|
(2,055) |
|
Gross excess tax benefits from share-based compensation |
|
|
(7,620) |
|
|
|
(11,438) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(59,254) |
|
|
|
(52,589) |
|
Merchandise inventory |
|
|
(28,757) |
|
|
|
(13,471) |
|
Other assets |
|
|
5,016 |
|
|
|
(27,355) |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
80,411 |
|
|
|
36,666 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
21,444 |
|
|
|
33,048 |
|
Long-term liabilities |
|
|
808 |
|
|
|
5,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
194,581 |
|
|
|
123,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
(596,023) |
|
|
|
(168,260) |
|
Redemptions and sales of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
383,345 |
|
|
|
188,850 |
|
Purchases of held-to-maturity securities |
|
|
(30,000) |
|
|
|
(70,000) |
|
Redemptions of held-to-maturity securities |
|
|
102,075 |
|
|
|
74,900 |
|
Purchase of property and equipment |
|
|
(25,872) |
|
|
|
(30,625) |
|
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(4,741) |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(171,216) |
|
|
|
(5,135) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury shares |
|
|
(16,136) |
|
|
|
(211,968) |
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under share-based
compensation plans |
|
|
41,439 |
|
|
|
45,487 |
|
Gross excess tax benefits from share-based compensation |
|
|
7,620 |
|
|
|
11,438 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(40,723) |
|
Change in book overdrafts |
|
|
(8,748) |
|
|
|
(4,550) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities |
|
|
24,175 |
|
|
|
(200,316) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
571 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase/(decrease) in cash |
|
|
48,111 |
|
|
|
(81,717) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period |
|
|
148,081 |
|
|
|
201,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period |
|
$ |
196,192 |
|
|
$ |
119,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
4
CDW CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
| 1. |
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
| |
| |
|
CDW Corporation (collectively with its subsidiaries, CDW or the Company) is a leading
provider of multi-branded information technology products and services in the United States and
Canada. We focus on meeting the technology needs of our customers in business, government, and
education through our extensive offering of products from leading brands and a variety of
value-added services. |
| |
| |
|
Basis of Presentation |
| |
| |
|
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Such principles were
applied on a basis consistent with those reflected in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2006 (2006 Form 10-K) and documents incorporated therein as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, except as disclosed in Note 2, Recently Adopted and
Newly Issued Accounting Standards. The accompanying financial data should be read in
conjunction with the notes to consolidated financial statements contained in the 2006 Form 10-K
and documents incorporated therein. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited
consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly our
financial position as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the results of operations for the
three and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, the cash flows for the six month
periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, and the changes in shareholders equity for the six month
period ended June 30, 2007. The unaudited consolidated statements of income for such interim
periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year. |
| |
| |
|
Use of Estimates |
| |
| |
|
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to make use of certain estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported periods. We base our estimates on
historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about carrying values of
assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could
differ from those estimates. See the audited consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto included in the 2006 Form 10-K for an additional discussion of the most significant
accounting policies and estimates used in the preparation of our financial statements. |
| |
| |
|
Reclassifications |
| |
| |
|
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year financial statements to conform to
the current year presentation. |
| |
| 2. |
|
Recently Adopted and Newly Issued Accounting Standards |
| |
| |
|
FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an Interpretation
of FASB Statement 109 (FIN 48) |
| |
| |
|
Effective January 1, 2007, we adopted FIN 48. See Note 4, Income Taxes, for further
information on the adoption of FIN 48. |
5
| |
|
Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) No. 06-3, How Taxes Collected from Customers and
Remitted to Governmental Authorities Should Be Presented in the Income Statement (That is, Gross
versus Net Presentation) (EITF 06-3) |
| |
| |
|
In June 2006, the EITF reached a consensus on EITF 06-3, which became effective for us on
January 1, 2007. The EITF consensus was that the presentation of taxes on either a gross or net
basis is an accounting policy decision that requires disclosure. Sales tax amounts collected
from customers and remitted to governmental authorities are presented on a net basis in our
income statement. The adoption of EITF 06-3 had no impact on our financial statements. |
| |
| |
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements (SFAS
157) |
| |
| |
|
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS 157. SFAS 157
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures
about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 applies where other accounting pronouncements require
or permit fair value measurements; it does not require any new fair value measurements. The
effects of adopting SFAS 157 will be determined by the types of instruments carried at fair
value in our financial statements at the time of adoption as well as the method utilized to
determine their fair values prior to adoption. SFAS
157 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007. We are currently evaluating the impact SFAS 157 will have on
our financial statements. |
| |
| |
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities, Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (SFAS
159) |
| |
| |
|
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159. SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure
certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value that are otherwise not permitted to be
accounted for at fair value under generally accepted accounting principles (the fair value
option). Election of the fair value option is made on an instrument-by-instrument basis and is
irrevocable. At the adoption date, unrealized gains and losses on financial assets and
liabilities for which the fair value option is elected would be reported as a cumulative
adjustment to beginning retained earnings and all subsequent changes in fair value would be
recorded as unrealized gains and losses in earnings. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007. We are currently evaluating the impact SFAS 159 will have on
our financial statements. |
| |
| 3. |
|
Share-Based Compensation |
| |
| |
|
The Company recognized $3.0 million and $3.7 million in share-based compensation expense for the
three month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $4.7 million and $7.9
million for the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. |
| |
| |
|
The following table sets forth the summary of stock option activity for the six months ended
June 30, 2007: |
6
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Value |
|
| Options |
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Term |
|
|
($000) (1) |
|
| |
Outstanding at January 1, 2007 |
|
|
8,077,083 |
|
|
$ |
42.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(1,023,679) |
|
|
$ |
39.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or expired |
|
|
(46,005) |
|
|
$ |
50.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2007 |
|
|
7,007,399 |
|
|
$ |
43.22 |
|
|
|
7.38 |
|
|
$ |
292,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested at June 30, 2007 |
|
|
4,947,546 |
|
|
$ |
42.30 |
|
|
|
6.53 |
|
|
$ |
211,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at June 30, 2007 |
|
|
4,929,695 |
|
|
$ |
42.36 |
|
|
|
6.51 |
|
|
$ |
210,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected to vest as of June 30, 2007 |
|
|
1,914,267 |
|
|
$ |
45.34 |
|
|
|
9.41 |
|
|
$ |
75,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
|
These amounts represent the difference between $84.97, the closing price of the
Companys common stock on June 30, 2007, and the exercise price. |
| |
|
A summary of the status of our nonvested restricted stock and restricted stock units
(collectively, Restricted Stock) as of January 1, 2007, and changes through the six months
ended June 30, 2007, is presented below: |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date |
| Restricted Stock |
|
Shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
| |
Nonvested at January 1, 2007 |
|
|
144,648 |
|
|
$ |
55.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
4,275 |
|
|
$ |
71.79 |
Vested |
|
|
(26,652) |
|
|
$ |
55.40 |
Forfeited |
|
|
(2,631) |
|
|
$ |
55.40 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at June 30, 2007 |
|
|
119,640 |
|
|
$ |
56.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
As of June 30, 2007, there was $24.5 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to
nonvested share-based compensation awards which is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 3.44 years. |
| |
| 4. |
|
Income Taxes |
| |
| |
|
Effective January 1, 2007, we adopted FIN 48. FIN 48 prescribes a more-likely-than-not
threshold for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or
expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition of income
tax assets and liabilities, financial statement classification and disclosure, and accounting
for related interest and penalties. |
| |
| |
|
In connection with adopting FIN 48, we have reviewed our recent income tax return filings and
related workpapers, results from the examination of our tax returns and the items subject to
examination to determine the extent and amount of any uncertain tax positions taken. The most
recent IRS examination was for the years 2003 and 2004. In that examination, the tax treatment
of one item was adjusted; the filing positions taken with respect to this item in 2005 and 2006
are consistent with the results of the final examination. Currently, only the 2005 and 2006 tax
years are open to audit by the IRS. The Company has been subject to audit by several states.
As of June 30, 2007, there are no on-going state income tax audits. The results of previous
state income tax audits
resulted in |
7
| |
|
immaterial adjustments to the tax reflected on our returns. While some of these
audits involved significant (though not necessarily material) issues such as whether certain of
our entities were required to file income taxes with a given state for certain years, the
positions taken have been supported and sustained. In addition, we do not have any significant
intercompany transactions with our sole international affiliate, CDW Canada. Therefore, as of
June 30, 2007, we do not have any material reserves for income taxes and there is no material
impact on our financial statements from the adoption of FIN 48. In addition, we did not have
any material unrecognized tax benefits at the date of adoption of FIN 48 and do not have any as
of June 30, 2007. |
| |
| |
|
It will be our policy going forward to record any income tax related interest income or expense
and penalties as components of income tax expense. |
| |
| 5. |
|
Marketable Securities |
| |
| |
|
Estimated fair values of marketable securities are based on quoted market prices. |
| |
| |
|
The following table summarizes our investments in marketable securities at June 30, 2007 (in
thousands): |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Estimated |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Amortized |
|
| Security Type |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Cost |
|
Available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and municipal bonds |
|
$ |
344,855 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
344,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale |
|
|
344,855 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
344,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-to-maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and Government agency securities |
|
|
39,203 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(70) |
|
|
|
39,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total held-to-maturity |
|
|
39,203 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(70) |
|
|
|
39,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total marketable securities |
|
$ |
384,058 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
(70) |
|
|
$ |
384,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
The following table presents the gross unrealized losses and fair values of our investments
in marketable securities, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual
securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of June 30, 2007 (in
thousands): |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Less Than 12 Months |
|
|
12 Months or Greater |
|
|
Total |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
| Security Type |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
U.S Government and
Government
agency securities |
|
$ |
9,981 |
|
|
$ |
(19) |
|
|
$ |
29,222 |
|
|
$ |
(51) |
|
|
$ |
39,203 |
|
|
$ |
(70) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
9,981 |
|
|
$ |
(19) |
|
|
$ |
29,222 |
|
|
$ |
(51) |
|
|
$ |
39,203 |
|
|
$ |
(70) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Because the Company believes that unrealized losses on fixed income securities are
primarily attributable to changes in interest rates, and because the Company has the ability and
intent to hold these investments until a recovery of fair value, which may be at maturity, the
Company does not consider those investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of June 30,
2007. |
| |
| |
|
Net unrealized holding losses on available-for-sale securities are determined by specific
identification and are included in accumulated other comprehensive income, which is reflected as
a separate component of shareholders equity. |
8
| |
|
The following table summarizes the maturities of our fixed income securities as of June 30, 2007
(in thousands): |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Estimated |
|
|
Amortized |
|
| |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
384,058 |
|
|
$ |
384,128 |
|
Due in greater than one year |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments in marketable securities |
|
$ |
384,058 |
|
|
$ |
384,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6. |
|
Financing Arrangements |
| |
| |
|
We have a $35.0 million unsecured line of credit which does not have a fixed expiration date.
Borrowings under the credit facility bear interest at the prime rate less 2.5%, LIBOR plus 0.45%
or the federal funds rate plus 0.45%, as determined by the Company. The Company does not incur
any facility fees associated with this line of credit. At June 30, 2007, there were no
borrowings under the credit facility. |
| |
| |
|
A second $35.0 million line of credit expired in June 2007, and we did not renew it. |
| |
| |
|
We have entered into security agreements with certain financial institutions in order to
facilitate the purchase of inventory from various suppliers under certain terms and conditions.
The agreements allow for a maximum credit line of $240.0 million collateralized by the inventory
purchases financed by the financial institutions and certain other assets. We do not incur any
interest expenses associated with these agreements, as we pay the balances when they are due.
All amounts owed the financial institutions are included in trade accounts payable. |
| |
| 7. |
|
Earnings Per Share |
| |
| |
|
At June 30, 2007, we had 79,555,486 outstanding common shares. We have granted options to
purchase common shares to the directors and coworkers of the Company under several stock option
plans. These options have a dilutive effect on the calculation of earnings per share. The
following table is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted
earnings per share computations as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
128, Earnings Per Share (in thousands, except per share amounts): |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
| |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Basic earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income available to common shareholders (numerator) |
|
$ |
80,091 |
|
|
$ |
73,111 |
|
|
$ |
156,871 |
|
|
$ |
134,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding
(denominator) |
|
|
79,103 |
|
|
|
78,994 |
|
|
|
78,856 |
|
|
|
79,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.93 |
|
|
$ |
1.99 |
|
|
$ |
1.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income available to common shareholders (numerator) |
|
$ |
80,091 |
|
|
$ |
73,111 |
|
|
$ |
156,871 |
|
|
$ |
134,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
|
79,103 |
|
|
|
78,994 |
|
|
|
78,856 |
|
|
|
79,488 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options on common stock |
|
|
1,892 |
|
|
|
1,570 |
|
|
|
1,765 |
|
|
|
1,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common shares and dilutive securities
(denominator) |
|
|
80,995 |
|
|
|
80,564 |
|
|
|
80,621 |
|
|
|
81,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.99 |
|
|
$ |
0.91 |
|
|
$ |
1.95 |
|
|
$ |
1.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Additional options to purchase common shares and Restricted Stock were outstanding during
the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, but were not included in the
computation of diluted earnings per share because they were antidilutive in that either: 1) the
exercise price of the options were greater than the average market price of common shares during
the respective periods or 2) the deemed per share proceeds under the treasury stock method (the |
9
| |
|
sum of the option exercise price, if applicable, any future compensation expense under Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, and any related windfall
tax benefits) for the options on a per share basis exceeded the average market price of common
shares during the respective periods. The following table summarizes the weighted-average
number, and the weighted-average exercise price, of those options and Restricted Stock which
were excluded from the calculations: |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
| |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Weighted-average
number of options (in
000s) |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
2,378 |
|
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
2,223 |
|
Weighted-average exercise price |
|
$ |
57.63 |
|
|
$ |
61.49 |
|
|
$ |
55.95 |
|
|
$ |
61.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of Restricted Stock
(in 000s) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
| 8. |
|
Share Repurchase Programs |
| |
| |
|
Since 1998, we have repurchased a total of 17.8 million shares of our common stock at a total
cost of $893.0 million under various share repurchase programs authorized by our Board of
Directors. In April 2006, our Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program of up to
5.0 million shares of our common stock. Share repurchases may be made from time to time in both
open market and private transactions, as conditions warrant. |
| |
| |
|
No shares were repurchased under the current program during the three month period ended June
30, 2007. During the three month period ended June 30, 2006, we repurchased 1.5 million shares
for $84.1 million. During the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, we repurchased
0.3 million shares for $16.1 million and 3.8 million shares for $211.9 million, respectively. |
| |
| |
|
As of June 30, 2007, 2.9 million shares remained available for repurchase under our current
program. Repurchased shares are held in treasury pending use for general corporate purposes,
including issuances under various stock plans. |
| |
| 9. |
|
Segment Information |
| |
| |
|
We have three operating segments: corporate sector, which is primarily comprised of business
customers; public sector, which is comprised of federal, state and local government entities,
and educational and healthcare institutions; and Berbee, a segment resulting from our
acquisition of Berbee Information Networks Corporation in October 2006, which provides advanced
technology solutions. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131,
Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, the internal organization
that is used by management for making operating decisions and assessing performance is the
source of our reportable segments. |
| |
| |
|
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 1, Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies. We allocate resources to and evaluate performance of our
segments based on both sales and operating income. |
| |
| |
|
The following tables present information about our reportable segments (in thousands): |
10
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 |
|
| |
|
Corporate |
|
|
Public |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Headquarters / |
|
|
|
| |
|
Sector |
|
|
Sector |
|
|
Berbee |
|
|
Other |
|
Consolidated |
|
| |
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,236,516 |
|
|
$ |
643,603 |
|
|
$ |
152,719 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
2,032,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Income (loss) from
operations |
|
$ |
97,807 |
|
|
$ |
36,185 |
|
|
$ |
5,784 |
|
|
$ |
(16,105) |
|
$ |
123,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net interest income and
other expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
129,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total assets |
|
$ |
521,462 |
|
|
$ |
323,215 |
|
|
$ |
309,337 |
|
|
$ |
1,073,773 |
|
$ |
2,227,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2006 |
|
| |
|
Corporate |
|
|
Public |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Headquarters / |
|
|
|
| |
|
Sector |
|
|
Sector |
|
|
Berbee |
|
|
Other |
|
Consolidated |
|
| |
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,111,879 |
|
|
$ |
521,579 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
1,633,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Income (loss) from
operations |
|
$ |
88,896 |
|
|
$ |
28,950 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
(10,008) |
|
$ |
107,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net interest income and
other expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
113,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total assets |
|
$ |
596,065 |
|
|
$ |
250,747 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
808,899 |
|
$ |
1,655,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 |
|
| |
|
Corporate |
|
|
Public |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Headquarters / |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Sector |
|
|
Sector |
|
|
Berbee |
|
|
Other |
|
Consolidated |
|
| |
Net sales |
|
$ |
2,455,557 |
|
|
$ |
1,140,999 |
|
|
$ |
295,400 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
3,891,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Income (loss) from
operations |
|
$ |
195,043 |
|
|
$ |
61,408 |
|
|
$ |
10,988 |
|
|
$ |
(25,813) |
|
$ |
241,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net interest income and
other expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
251,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total assets |
|
$ |
521,462 |
|
|
$ |
323,215 |
|
|
$ |
309,337 |
|
|
$ |
1,073,773 |
|
$ |
2,227,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 |
|
| |
|
Corporate |
|
|
Public |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Headquarters / |
|
|
|
| |
|
Sector |
|
|
Sector |
|
|
Berbee |
|
|
Other |
|
Consolidated |
|
| |
Net sales |
|
$ |
2,262,063 |
|
|
$ |
960,024 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
3,222,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Income (loss) from
operations |
|
$ |
178,194 |
|
|
$ |
43,653 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
(19,763) |
|
$ |
202,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net interest income and
other expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
211,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total assets |
|
$ |
596,065 |
|
|
$ |
250,747 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
808,899 |
|
$ |
1,655,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Our assets are primarily managed by our headquarters functions, including the majority of
all cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities, inventory, and property and equipment.
As a result, capital expenditures and related depreciation are immaterial for the operating
segments. The operating segments assets consist principally of accounts receivable, and, for
the Berbee segment specifically, goodwill and other intangible assets. |
| |
| |
|
No single customer accounted for more than 10% of net sales in the three or six month periods
ended June 30, 2007 or 2006. During the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and
2006, approximately 2% of our net sales were to customers outside of the continental United
States, primarily in Canada. |
| |
| 10. |
|
Contingencies |
| |
| |
|
From time to time, customers of CDW file voluntary petitions for reorganization under the United
States bankruptcy laws. In such cases, certain pre-petition payments received by CDW could be
considered preference items and subject to return to the bankruptcy administrator. CDW believes
that the final resolution of any such pending preference items will not have a material adverse
effect on its financial condition. |
| |
| |
|
In addition, CDW is party to legal proceedings that arise from time to time, both with respect
to specific transactions and in the ordinary course of our business. CDW is also subject to
various audits, including by federal, state and local tax authorities, by various government
agencies relating to sales under certain government contracts and by vendors relating to vendor
incentive programs. |
| |
| |
|
We do not believe that any current audit or pending or threatened litigation will have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition. Litigation and audits, however, involve
uncertainties and it is possible that the eventual outcome of litigation or audits could
adversely affect our results of operations for a particular period. |
| |
| 11. |
|
Proposed Merger |
| |
| |
|
On May 29, 2007, we entered into a definitive Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger
Agreement) with VH Holdings, Inc. (Holdings) and VH MergerSub, Inc., a wholly owned
subsidiary of Holdings (Sub). Holdings was formed by Madison Dearborn Partners, LLC (Madison
Dearborn), a private equity investment firm. The Merger Agreement provides that, upon the
terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, Sub will merge with and
into CDW, with CDW as the surviving corporation of the merger (the Merger). As a result of
the Merger, CDW will become a wholly owned subsidiary of Holdings and each outstanding share of
CDW common stock (other than shares held by Holdings and dissenting shares) will be converted
into the right to receive $87.75 in cash, without interest. Upon closing of the Merger, CDW
will be controlled by |
12
investment funds affiliated with Madison Dearborn and Providence Equity Partners Inc.
Consummation of the Merger is subject to customary closing conditions, including approval of the
Merger Agreement by our shareholders and the absence of certain legal impediments to the
consummation of the Merger. Our Board of Directors approved the Merger Agreement and has
recommended that CDWs shareholders approve the transaction. We have called a special meeting
to be held on August 9, 2007 (the Special Meeting) for our shareholders of record on July 5,
2007 to vote on the Merger Agreement.
During the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2007, we recorded $8.0 million pre-tax
($4.9 million after-tax) of costs in connection with the proposed Merger. These costs are
included in selling and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
On May 31, 2007, three putative class-action complaints were filed by shareholders of CDW, and
on June 26, 2007, a fourth complaint was filed. Two complaints were filed in the United States
District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Murphy v. CDW Corporation, et al., No.
07-CV-3033 and Martin, et al. v. CDW Corporation et al., No. 07-CV-3571. The other two
complaints were filed in the Circuit Court of the Nineteenth Judicial District, Lake County,
Illinois: Schuman v. CDW Corporation et al., No. 07-CH-1416, and Fruchter v. CDW Corporation et
al., No. 07-CH-1417. The complaints each name CDW and the individual members of the CDW board
of directors as defendants, and, in general, allege purported class claims of breach of
fiduciary duty against CDW and its directors challenging the process used to sell the company
and for failure to ensure that CDWs shareholders receive fair and adequate value for their
shares, failure to value CDW properly and failure to disclose material information to CDWs
shareholders, including the details of competing offers. The complaints also allege
self-dealing by directors, some of whom are alleged to have received financial benefits not
shared by the class. The Schuman complaint names Madison Dearborn as an additional defendant,
alleging that Madison Dearborn aided and abetted breaches of fiduciary duty by CDWs directors.
The Schuman complaint also alleges improper conflicts between CDW and its financial advisors,
including conflicts based on alleged business and other relationships between CDWs financial
advisors and CDW and Madison Dearborn. The Fruchter complaint has been amended to name Madison
Dearborn and Morgan Stanley, who acted as CDWs financial advisor, as additional defendants,
alleging that those defendants aided and abetted breaches of fiduciary duty by CDWs directors,
and to add allegations with respect to information that allegedly was not disclosed or was
inadequately disclosed in the proxy statement relating to the Special Meeting. The Murphy
complaint has been amended to add claims under the federal securities laws with respect to
allegedly false and misleading statements contained in the proxy statement relating to the
Special Meeting. Among other things, all four complaints seek to enjoin the Merger. We believe
the complaints are without merit. On July 30, 2007, the state court dismissed the Schuman and Fruchter actions without prejudice on
the ground that there was another action pending on behalf of the same class for the same cause in
federal court.
Also on July 30, 2007, CDW and the other named defendants reached an agreement in principle
with counsel for all of the plaintiffs who had filed putative class action lawsuits relating to the
Merger. Under the terms of the agreement, CDW, the other named defendants, and plaintiffs have
agreed to settle the actions subject to court approval. CDW and the other defendants deny the
allegations made in the actions and deny having committed, or having aided and abetted, any breach
of fiduciary duty or other violation of state or federal law. The agreement provides for dismissal
of the federal actions with prejudice, for certification of a settlement class, and for releases of
all claims in both the federal and state actions by the settlement class effective upon approval of
a stipulation of settlement by the federal court. Under the terms of the agreement, CDW has agreed
to make a supplemental filing concerning the Merger through a filing on Form 8-K and, provided the
Merger closes and subject to the terms of the agreement, has agreed to pay certain attorneys fees,
costs, and expenses incurred by plaintiffs. The agreement will not affect the amount of
consideration to be paid to shareholders of CDW in connection with the Merger. In addition, the
agreement will not affect the timing of the Special Meeting.
13
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations
should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated financial statements and the notes
thereto.
Overview
CDW Corporation (collectively with its subsidiaries, CDW or the Company) is a leading
provider of multi-branded information technology products and services in the United States and
Canada. We focus on meeting the technology needs of our customers in business, government, and
education through our extensive offering of products from leading brands and a variety of
value-added services.
For financial reporting purposes, we have three operating segments: corporate sector, which is
primarily comprised of business customers; public sector, which is comprised of federal, state and
local government entities, and educational and healthcare institutions; and Berbee, a segment
resulting from our acquisition of Berbee Information Networks Corporation (Berbee) in October
2006, which provides advanced information technology solutions. See Note 9, Segment Information,
to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on our operating segments.
CDW management monitors a number of financial and non-financial measures and ratios on a
daily, weekly, and monthly basis in order to track the progress of the business and make
adjustments as necessary. We believe that the most important of these measures and ratios include
daily sales, by business segment and total company, gross margin, number of orders shipped per day,
number of orders shipped complete per day, inventory balance, aging, and turnover, cash, cash
equivalents, and marketable securities balance, accounts receivable balance and aging, accounts
receivable days sales outstanding, operating expenses, operating margin, and coworker turnover. We
also monitor certain measures and ratios specifically for the Berbee operating segment, such as
realized bill rates and utilization of engineers and consultants. The measures and ratios are
compared to standards or objectives set by management, so that actions can be taken, as necessary,
in order to achieve the standards and objectives.
In Item 7 (Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations) of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (2006 Form
10-K), which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 1, 2007, we included a
discussion of the most significant accounting policies and estimates used in the preparation of our
financial statements. There has been no material change in the policies and estimates used by us
in the preparation of our financial statements since the filing of the 2006 Form 10-K.
Proposed Merger
On May 29, 2007, we entered into a definitive Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger
Agreement) with VH Holdings, Inc. (Holdings) and VH MergerSub, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary
of Holdings (Sub). Holdings was formed by Madison Dearborn Partners, LLC (Madison Dearborn), a
private equity investment firm. The Merger Agreement provides that, upon the terms and subject to
the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, Sub will merge with and into CDW, with CDW as the
surviving corporation of the merger (the Merger). As a result of the Merger, CDW will become a
wholly owned subsidiary of Holdings and each outstanding share of CDW common stock (other than
shares held by Holdings and dissenting shares) will be converted into the right to receive $87.75
in cash, without interest. Upon closing of the Merger, CDW will be controlled by investment funds
affiliated with Madison Dearborn and Providence Equity Partners Inc.
Consummation of the Merger is subject to customary closing conditions, including approval of
the Merger Agreement by our shareholders and the absence of certain legal impediments to the
consummation of the Merger. Our Board of Directors approved the Merger Agreement and has
recommended that CDWs shareholders approve the transaction. We have called a special meeting to
be held on August 9, 2007 for our shareholders of record on July 5, 2007 to vote on the Merger Agreement.
14
During the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2007, we recorded $8.0 million pre-tax
($4.9 million after-tax) of costs in connection with the proposed Merger (merger-related costs).
These costs are included in selling and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of
Income.
Recently Adopted and Newly Issued Accounting Standards
Effective January 1, 2007, we adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty
in Income Taxes an Interpretation of FASB Statement 109 (FIN 48). See Note 4, Income Taxes,
to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on the adoption of FIN 48.
In June 2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached a consensus on EITF No. 06-3,
How Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities Should Be Presented in
the Income Statement (That is, Gross versus Net Presentation) (EITF 06-3), which became
effective for us on January 1, 2007. The EITF consensus was that the presentation of taxes on
either a gross or net basis is an accounting policy decision that requires disclosure. Sales tax
amounts collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities are presented on a net
basis in our income statement. The adoption of EITF 06-3 had no impact on our financial
statements.
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157). SFAS 157 defines
fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair
value measurements. SFAS 157 applies where other accounting pronouncements require or permit fair
value measurements; it does not require any new fair value measurements. The effects of adopting
SFAS 157 will be determined by the types of instruments carried at fair value in our financial
statements at the time of adoption as well as the method utilized to determine their fair values
prior to adoption. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We
are currently evaluating the impact SFAS 157 will have on our financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, Including an Amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115 (SFAS 159). SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure certain financial
assets and liabilities at fair value that are otherwise not permitted to be accounted for at fair
value under generally accepted accounting principles (the fair value option). Election of the
fair value option is made on an instrument-by-instrument basis and is irrevocable. At the adoption
date, unrealized gains and losses on financial assets and liabilities for which the fair value
option is elected would be reported as a cumulative adjustment to beginning retained earnings and
all subsequent changes in fair value would be recorded as unrealized gains and losses in earnings.
SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are currently
evaluating the impact SFAS 159 will have on our financial statements.
Results Of Operations
We completed the acquisition of Berbee in October 2006. As such, the results of operations
discussed in this section, including in the four tables presented below, include Berbee activity
for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2007, but not for the three and six month
periods ended June 30, 2006.
The following table sets forth for the periods indicated information derived from our
consolidated statements of income expressed as a percentage of net sales:
15
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
Percentage of Net Sales |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
| |
Financial Results |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net sales |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
| |
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
83.9 |
|
|
|
|
83.8 |
|
|
|
|
83.8 |
|
|
|
|
83.9 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Gross profit |
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
|
16.2 |
|
|
|
|
16.2 |
|
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
| |
Selling and administrative expenses (1) |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
| |
Advertising expense |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Income from operations |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
| |
Interest and other income/expense |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
| |
Income tax provision |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net income |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
|
Includes $8.0 million of merger-related costs in the three and six month periods ended June
30, 2007. |
The following table sets forth for the periods indicated a summary of certain of our
consolidated operating statistics:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
| |
Operating Statistics |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Direct web sales (000s) |
|
|
|
$588,872 |
|
|
$493,522 |
|
|
$1,139,716 |
|
|
$994,489 |
| |
Sales force, end of period |
|
|
|
2,722 |
|
|
2,179 |
|
|
2,722 |
|
|
2,179 |
| |
Annualized inventory turnover |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
26 |
|
|
23 |
| |
Accounts
receivable - days sales outstanding |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
38 |
|
|
42 |
|
|
39 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents net sales of products by product category as a percentage of
total net sales of products. Net sales of products do not include items such as commission revenue
or delivery charges to customers, and were approximately 96% of total net sales in the three and
six month periods ended June 30, 2007, and approximately 97% of total net sales in the three and
six month periods ended June 30, 2006.
Product lines are based upon internal product code classifications. Product mix for the three
and six month periods ended June 30, 2006 has been retroactively adjusted for certain changes in
individual product classifications.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
| |
Analysis of Product Mix |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Notebook computers and accessories |
|
|
|
12.4 |
% |
|
|
|
13.2 |
% |
|
|
|
12.9 |
% |
|
|
|
12.9 |
% |
|
| |
Desktop computers and servers |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Subtotal computer products |
|
|
|
26.3 |
|
|
|
|
26.6 |
|
|
|
|
26.3 |
|
|
|
|
26.4 |
|
|
| |
Software |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
| |
Data storage devices |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
| |
Printers |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
| |
NetComm products |
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
| |
Video |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
| |
Add-on boards/memory |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
| |
Input devices |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
| |
Other |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
The following table represents the change in the Companys year-over-year net sales of
products by product category for each of the periods indicated. Product lines are based upon
internal product code classifications. The rates of change for the three and six month periods
ended June 30, 2006 have been retroactively adjusted for certain changes in individual product
classifications.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
| |
Analysis of Product Category Growth |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Notebook computers and accessories |
|
|
|
15.9 |
% |
|
|
|
11.0 |
% |
|
|
|
18.7 |
% |
|
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
| |
Desktop computers and servers |
|
|
|
27.3 |
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
| |
Subtotal computer products |
|
|
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
| |
Software |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
| |
Data storage devices |
|
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
| |
Printers |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
| |
NetComm products |
|
|
|
92.1 |
|
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
|
79.0 |
|
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
| |
Video |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
| |
Add-on boards/memory |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
| |
Input devices |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
| |
Other |
|
|
|
41.3 |
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
|
38.7 |
|
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Month Period Ended June 30, 2007 Compared to Three Month Period Ended June 30, 2006
Net sales in the second quarter of 2007 increased 24.4% to $2.033 billion, compared to $1.633
billion in the second quarter of 2006. Results for the second quarter of 2007 included sales made
by Berbee, which was acquired in October 2006. Sales of notebook computers and accessories,
desktop computers and servers, data storage devices, and netcomm products each increased more than
15% in the second quarter of 2007 over the second quarter of 2006. Corporate sector segment sales
increased 11.2% to $1.237 billion in the second quarter of 2007 from $1.112 billion in the second
quarter of 2006, and comprised 60.8% of our total net sales for the quarter. Public sector segment
sales increased 23.4% to $643.6 million in the second quarter of 2007 from $521.6 million in the
second quarter of 2006, and comprised 31.7% of our total net sales for the quarter. Berbee
generated sales of $152.7 million in the second quarter of 2007, and comprised 7.5% of our total
net sales for the quarter. Compared to the corporate sector and public sector segments, Berbees
business model is more project oriented, which can result in a greater degree of variability in
sales from period to period.
Gross profit increased 24.2% to $328.0 million in the second quarter of 2007, compared to
$264.0 million in the second quarter of 2006. As a percentage of net sales, gross profit was 16.1%
in the second quarter of 2007, compared to 16.2% in the second quarter of 2006.
Our objective for gross profit as a percentage of net sales is between 15.5% and 16.2%. The
gross profit margin depends on various factors, including vendor incentive and inventory price
protection programs, cooperative advertising funds classified as a reduction of cost of sales,
product mix, net service contract revenue, commission revenue, pricing strategies, market
conditions, and other factors, any of which could result in changes in gross margins from recent
experience.
Selling and administrative expenses increased 36.4% in the second quarter of 2007 to $172.1
million, compared to $126.2 million in the second quarter of 2006, while increasing as a percentage
of net sales to 8.5% versus 7.7% in the second quarter of 2006. The primary factors that impacted
selling and administrative expenses were:
| |
|
|
The inclusion of the Berbee segment operating expenses in the second quarter of 2007, as
a result of the acquisition in October 2006. |
17
| |
|
|
Increased payroll costs, as a result of the continued investment in our sales force.
Our sales force increased to 2,722 coworkers at June 30, 2007, compared to 2,179 coworkers
at June 30, 2006. |
| |
| |
|
|
The inclusion of $8.0 million of merger-related costs as previously discussed. |
Advertising expense increased to $32.2 million in the second quarter of 2007, compared to
$30.0 million in the same period of 2006. As a percentage of net sales, advertising expense was
1.5% in the second quarter of 2007 and 1.9% in the same period of 2006.
Consolidated operating income was $123.7 million in the second quarter of 2007, an increase of
14.7% from $107.8 million in the second quarter of 2006. Consolidated operating income as a
percentage of net sales was 6.1% in the second quarter of 2007, compared to 6.6% in the second
quarter of 2006. Corporate sector segment operating income was $97.8 million in the second quarter
of 2007, an increase of 10.0% from $88.9 million in the second quarter of 2006. The increase in
corporate sector segment operating income was primarily due to an increase in sales and gross
margin, partially offset by increased payroll costs as a result of the investment in selling
resources. Public sector segment operating income was $36.2 million in the second quarter of 2007,
an increase of 25.0% from $29.0 million in the second quarter of 2006. The increase in public
sector segment operating income was primarily due to an increase in sales. Berbee operating income
was $5.8 million in the second quarter of 2007. Headquarters expenses increased to $16.1 million in
the second quarter of 2007 compared to $10.0 million in the second quarter of 2006. Headquarters
expenses included the $8.0 million of merger-related costs in the second quarter of 2007.
Our objective for operating income as a percentage of net sales is between 6.0% to 6.4%.
The effective income tax rate, expressed as a percentage of income before income taxes,
increased to 38.0% in the second quarter of 2007 compared to 35.4% in the second quarter of 2006.
This increase was primarily attributable to a $2.3 million benefit related to the resolution of an
audit of the Companys 2003 federal income tax return in the second quarter of 2006 that did not
repeat in the second quarter of 2007.
Net income in the second quarter of 2007 was $80.1 million, a 9.5% increase from $73.1 million
in the second quarter of 2006. Net income in the second quarter of 2007 included the
merger-related costs of $4.9 million after-tax.
Diluted earnings per share were $0.99 in the second quarter of 2007, an increase of 8.8% from
$0.91 in the second quarter of 2006. The merger-related costs decreased diluted earnings per share
by approximately $0.06 in the second quarter of 2007.
Six Month Period Ended June 30, 2007 Compared to Six Month Period Ended June 30, 2006
Net sales in the six month period ended June 30, 2007 increased 20.8% to $3.892 billion,
compared to $3.222 billion in the same period of 2006. Results for the first six months of 2007
included sales made by Berbee, which was acquired in October 2006. Sales of notebook computers and
accessories, desktop computers and servers, data storage devices, and netcomm products each
increased more than 15% in the first six months of 2007 over the first six months of 2006.
Corporate sector segment sales increased 8.6% to $2.456 billion in the six month period ended June
30, 2007 from $2.262 billion in the six month period ended June 30, 2006, and comprised 63.1% of
our total net sales for the period. Public sector segment sales increased 18.9% to $1,141.0
million in the six month period ended June 30, 2007 from $960.0 million in the six month period
ended June 30, 2006, and comprised 29.3% of our total net sales for the period. Berbee generated
sales of $295.4 million in the six month period ended June 30, 2007, and comprised 7.6% of our
total net sales for the period. Compared to the corporate sector and public sector segments,
Berbees business model is more project oriented, which can result in a greater degree of
variability in sales from period to period.
18
Gross profit increased 21.5% to $629.3 million in the first six months of 2007, compared to
$517.9 million in the first six months of 2006. As a percentage of net sales, gross profit was 16.2% in
the first six months of 2007, compared to 16.1% in the same period of 2006.
Our objective for gross profit as a percentage of net sales is between 15.5% and 16.2%. The
gross profit margin depends on various factors, including vendor incentive and inventory price
protection programs, cooperative advertising funds classified as a reduction of cost of sales,
product mix, net service contract revenue, commission revenue, pricing strategies, market
conditions, and other factors, any of which could result in changes in gross margins from recent
experience.
Selling and administrative expenses increased 28.0% in the first six months of 2007 to $326.3
million, compared to $254.9 million in the same period of 2006, while increasing as a percentage of
net sales to 8.4% in the first six months of 2007 versus 7.9% in the first six months of 2006. The
primary factors that impacted selling and administrative expenses were:
| |
|
|
The inclusion of the Berbee segment operating expenses in the first six months of 2007,
as a result of the acquisition in October 2006. |
| |
| |
|
|
Increased payroll costs, as a result of the continued investment in our sales force.
Our sales force increased to 2,722 coworkers at June 30, 2007, compared to 2,179 coworkers
at June 30, 2006. |
| |
| |
|
|
The inclusion of $8.0 million of merger-related costs associated with the Merger as
previously discussed. |
Advertising expense increased to $61.4 million in the six month period ended June 30, 2007,
compared to $60.9 million in the same period of 2006. As a percentage of net sales, advertising
expense decreased to 1.6% in the first six months of 2007, compared to 1.9% in the first six months
of 2006.
Consolidated operating income was $241.6 million in the six month period ended June 30, 2007,
an increase of 19.6% from $202.1 million in the six month period ended June 30, 2006. Consolidated
operating income as a percentage of net sales was 6.2% in the first six months of 2007, compared to
6.3% in the same period of 2006. Corporate sector segment operating income was $195.0 million in
the first six months of 2007, an increase of 9.5% from $178.2 million in the first six months of
2006. The increase in corporate sector segment operating income was primarily due to an increase
in sales and gross margin, partially offset by increased payroll costs as a result of the
investment in selling resources. Public sector segment operating income was $61.4 million in the
first six months of 2007, an increase of 40.7% from $43.7 million in the first six months of 2006.
The increase in public sector segment operating income was primarily due to an increase in sales
and gross margin. Berbee operating income was $11.0 million in the first six months of 2007.
Headquarters expenses increased to $25.8 million in the six month period ended June 30, 2007
compared to $19.8 million in the same period of 2006. Headquarters expenses included the $8.0
million of merger-related costs in the six month period ended June 30, 2007.
Our objective for operating income as a percentage of net sales is between 6.0% to 6.4%.
The effective income tax rate, expressed as a percentage of income before income taxes,
increased to 37.5% in the six month period ended June 30, 2007 compared to 36.3% in the six month
period ended June 30, 2006. This increase was primarily attributable to a $2.3 million benefit
related to the resolution of an audit of the Companys 2003 federal income tax return in the first
six months of 2006 that did not repeat in the first six months of 2007.
Net income in the first six months of 2007 was $156.9 million, a 16.4% increase from $134.8
million in the first six months of 2006. Net income in the first six months of 2007 included the
merger-related costs of $4.9 million after-tax.
19
Diluted earnings per share were $1.95 in the first six months of 2007, an increase of 17.5% from
$1.66 in the first six months of 2006. The merger-related costs decreased diluted earnings per
share by approximately $0.06 in the first six months of 2007.
Seasonality
Sales in our corporate sector segment, which primarily serves business customers, have not
historically experienced significant seasonality throughout the year. In contrast, sales in our
public sector segment have historically been higher in the third quarter than in other quarters due
to the buying patterns of federal government and education customers. If sales to federal
government and education customers increase as a percentage of overall sales, the Company as a
whole may experience increased seasonality in future periods.
Legal Proceedings
For a description of certain legal proceedings, see Item 1 of Part II of this Form 10-Q.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Working Capital
We have historically financed our operations and capital expenditures primarily through cash
flows from operations. At June 30, 2007, we had cash, cash equivalents, and current marketable
securities of $580.3 million, representing an increase of $228.7 million in cash, cash equivalents,
and current marketable securities from December 31, 2006. Our working capital increased $234.9
million, to $1.255 billion at June 30, 2007 from $1.020 billion at December 31, 2006. The increase
in working capital was primarily due to the increase in cash, cash equivalents, and current
marketable securities.
We have a $35.0 million unsecured line of credit which does not have a fixed expiration date.
Borrowings under the credit facility bear interest at the prime rate less 2.5%, LIBOR plus 0.45% or
the federal funds rate plus 0.45%, as determined by the Company. The Company does not incur any
facility fees associated with this line of credit. At June 30, 2007, there were no borrowings
under the credit facility.
A second $35.0 million line of credit expired in June 2007, and we did not renew it.
We have entered into security agreements with certain financial institutions in order to
facilitate the purchase of inventory from various suppliers under certain terms and conditions.
The agreements allow for a maximum credit line of $240.0 million collateralized by the inventory
purchases financed by the financial institutions and certain other assets. We are currently in the
process of amending one of the agreements to reduce our maximum credit line by $40.0 million. In
addition, if the proposed Merger is completed, we will be required to enter into new agreements
and, under those new agreements, we expect our maximum credit line under these agreements to be
$125.0 million. We do not incur any interest expenses associated with these agreements, as we pay
the balances when they are due. All amounts owed the financial institutions are included in trade
accounts payable.
Since 1998, we have repurchased a total of 17.8 million shares of our common stock at a total
cost of $893.0 million under various share repurchase programs authorized by our Board of
Directors. In April 2006, our Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program of up to
5.0 million shares of our common stock. Share repurchases may be made from time to time in both
open market and private transactions, as conditions warrant.
No shares were repurchased under the current program during the three month period ended June
30, 2007. During the three month period ended June 30, 2006, we repurchased 1.5 million shares for
$84.1 million. During the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, we repurchased 0.3
million shares for $16.1 million and 3.8 million shares for $211.9 million, respectively.
20
As of June 30, 2007, 2.9 million shares remained available for repurchase under our current
program. Repurchased shares are held in treasury pending use for general corporate purposes,
including issuances under various stock plans.
Capital expenditures in the first six months of 2007 were $25.9 million, primarily for
improvements to our information technology systems. Total capital expenditures for 2007 are
expected to be approximately $55 million to $60 million.
We anticipate that the funds necessary for Holdings to complete the Merger will be funded by
cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities, new secured credit facilities, private and/or
public offerings of debt securities, and equity financing. We currently expect total debt
outstanding at the close of the Merger to be approximately $4.6 billion. Our capitalization,
liquidity, and capital resources will change substantially if the Merger is approved by our
shareholders, the Merger is completed, and the related debt and equity transactions are completed.
Upon closing of the debt transactions, we will be highly leveraged with significant debt service
requirements.
Cash Flows for the Six Month Period Ended June 30, 2007
Net cash provided by operating activities was $194.6 million in the six month period ended
June 30, 2007. The primary factors that affected our cash flow from operations were net income and
an increase in accounts payable. The increase in accounts payable positively impacted cash flows
by $80.4 million due to the timing of our normal cycle of payments at the end of the period.
Net cash used in investing activities for the six month period ended June 30, 2007 was $171.2
million, including $626.0 million to purchase marketable securities and $25.9 million used for
capital expenditures, partially offset by $485.4 million provided by redemptions and sales of marketable
securities. In addition, we made a final working capital adjustment payment of $4.7 million in
early 2007 related to the October 2006 acquisition of Berbee.
Net cash provided by financing activities for the six month period ended June 30, 2007 was
$24.2 million. The primary factor that affected our cash flow from financing activities was
proceeds of $41.4 million from the issuance of common stock under share-based compensation plans.
Statements in this report about the expected timing, completion, and effect of the proposed
Merger between CDW and a subsidiary of Holdings and all other statements in this report that are
forward-looking (that is, not historical in nature) are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions
of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements include,
for example, statements concerning the Companys sales growth, cooperative advertising
reimbursements, vendor incentives, gross profit as a percentage of sales, selling and
administrative expenses, advertising expense, operating income as a percentage of sales, and
effective tax rate. In addition, words such as likely, may, would, could, should,
anticipate, believe, estimate, expect, intend, plan, objective, and similar
expressions, may identify forward-looking statements in this report. Forward-looking statements in
this report are based on the Companys beliefs and expectations as of the date of this report and
are subject to risks and uncertainties, including those described below, which may have a
significant impact on the Companys business, operating results or financial condition. Investors
are cautioned that these forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain. Should one or more
of the risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual
results or outcomes may vary materially from those described herein. CDW may not be able to
complete the Merger because of a number of factors, including, among other things, the failure to
obtain shareholder approval, the failure to consummate the financing, or the failure to satisfy
other conditions. The following factors, among others, may have an impact on the accuracy of the
forward-looking statements concerning our business contained in this report: the continued
acceptance of the Companys distribution channel by vendors and customers, the timely availability
and acceptance of new products, continuation of key vendor relationships and support programs,
changes in pricing by our vendors, changes in the competitive environment, the continuing
development, maintenance and operation of the Companys I.T.
21
systems, changes and uncertainties in economic and geopolitical conditions that could affect the rate of
I.T. spending by the Companys customers, the ability of the Company to hire and retain qualified
account managers and any additional factors described from time to time in the Companys filings
with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These among other factors are discussed in further
detail under Item 1A, Risk Factors, and elsewhere in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on March 1, 2007, and which discussion is incorporated by reference herein.
22
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
There has been no material change from the information provided in Item 7A of the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act), the Companys management carried out an evaluation, with the participation of
the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under
the Exchange Act) as of the end of the last fiscal quarter. Based upon that evaluation, the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2007, the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required
to be disclosed by the Company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) in the reports the
Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There was no change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the Companys fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2007 that materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial
reporting.
Part II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
On May 31, 2007, three putative class-action complaints were filed by shareholders of CDW, and
on June 26, 2007, a fourth complaint was filed. Two complaints were filed in the United States
District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Murphy v. CDW Corporation, et al., No.
07-CV-3033 and Martin, et al. v. CDW Corporation et al., No. 07-CV-3571. The other two complaints
were filed in the Circuit Court of the Nineteenth Judicial District, Lake County, Illinois: Schuman
v. CDW Corporation et al., No. 07-CH-1416, and Fruchter v. CDW Corporation et al., No. 07-CH-1417.
The complaints each name CDW and the individual members of the CDW board of directors as
defendants, and, in general, allege purported class claims of breach of fiduciary duty against CDW
and its directors challenging the process used to sell the company and for failure to ensure that
CDWs shareholders receive fair and adequate value for their shares, failure to value CDW properly
and failure to disclose material information to CDWs shareholders, including the details of
competing offers. The complaints also allege self-dealing by directors, some of whom are alleged
to have received financial benefits not shared by the class. The Schuman complaint names Madison
Dearborn as an additional defendant, alleging that Madison Dearborn aided and abetted breaches of
fiduciary duty by CDWs directors. The Schuman complaint also alleges improper conflicts between
CDW and its financial advisors, including conflicts based on alleged business and other
relationships between CDWs financial advisors and CDW and Madison Dearborn. The Fruchter
complaint has been amended to name Madison Dearborn and Morgan Stanley, who acted as CDWs
financial advisor, as additional defendants, alleging that those defendants aided and abetted
breaches of fiduciary duty by CDWs directors, and to add allegations with respect to information
that allegedly was not disclosed or was inadequately disclosed in the proxy statement relating to
the Special Meeting. The Murphy complaint has been amended to add claims under the federal
securities laws with respect to allegedly false and misleading statements contained in the proxy
statement relating to the Special Meeting. Among other things, all four complaints seek to enjoin
the Merger. We believe the complaints are without merit. On July 30, 2007, the state court dismissed the Schuman and Fruchter actions without prejudice on
the ground that there was another action pending on behalf of the same class for the same cause in
federal court.
Also on July 30, 2007, CDW and the other named defendants reached an agreement in principle
with counsel for all of the plaintiffs who had filed putative class action lawsuits relating to the
Merger. Under the terms of the agreement, CDW, the other named defendants, and plaintiffs have
agreed to settle the actions subject to court approval. CDW and the other defendants deny the
allegations made in the actions and deny having committed, or having aided and abetted, any breach
of fiduciary duty or other violation of state or federal law. The agreement provides for dismissal
of the federal actions with prejudice, for certification of a settlement class, and for releases of
all claims in both the federal and state actions by the settlement class effective upon approval of
a stipulation of settlement by the federal court. Under the terms of the agreement, CDW has agreed
to make a supplemental filing concerning the Merger through a filing on Form 8-K and, provided the
Merger closes and subject to the terms of the agreement, has agreed to pay certain attorneys fees,
costs, and expenses incurred by plaintiffs. The agreement will not affect the amount of
consideration to be paid to shareholders of CDW in connection with the Merger. In addition, the
agreement will not affect the timing of the Special Meeting.
From time to time, customers of CDW file voluntary petitions for reorganization under the
United
23
States bankruptcy laws. In such cases, certain pre-petition payments received by CDW could be
considered preference items and subject to return to the bankruptcy administrator. CDW believes
that the final resolution of any such pending preference items will not have a material adverse
effect on its financial condition.
In addition, CDW is party to legal proceedings that arise from time to time, both with
respect to specific transactions and in the ordinary course of our business. CDW is also
subject to various audits, including by federal, state and local tax authorities, by various
government agencies relating to sales under certain government contracts and by vendors
relating to vendor incentive programs.
We do not believe that any current audit or pending or threatened litigation will have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition. Litigation and audits, however, involve
uncertainties and it is possible that the eventual outcome of litigation or audits could
adversely affect our results of operations for a particular period.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There has been no material change from the risk factors described in Item 1A of the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 other than as set
forth below.
Failure to complete the proposed Merger could negatively affect us.
On May 29, 2007, we entered into the Merger Agreement. There is no assurance that the
Merger Agreement will be approved by our stockholders, and there is no assurance that the other
conditions to the completion of the Merger will be satisfied. If the Merger is not completed
for any reason, CDW will be subject to a number of material risks, including the following:
| |
|
|
the market price of CDW common stock may decline to the extent that the current
market price of CDW common stock reflects a market assumption that the Merger will be
completed; |
| |
| |
|
|
costs relating to the Merger Agreement, such as legal, accounting and financial
advisory fees, and in specified circumstances, termination and expense reimbursement
fees, must be paid by us even if the Merger is not completed; |
| |
| |
|
|
the diversion of managements attention from the day-to-day business of CDW and the
potential disruption to its coworkers and its relationships with customers, suppliers
and distributors during the period before the completion of the Merger may make it
difficult for CDW to achieve its strategic plan; and |
| |
| |
|
|
the restrictions on the conduct of CDWs business prior to completion of the Merger
could delay or prevent us from undertaking business opportunities that might arise
pending completion of the Merger. |
24
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
We did not repurchase any shares of our common stock under our current share repurchase
program in the three months ended June 30, 2007. This excludes shares repurchased to satisfy
tax withholding obligations that arise on the vesting of shares of restricted stock.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
| (a) |
|
The Company held its annual meeting of shareholders on June 5, 2007. |
| |
| (b) |
|
Set forth below are the two matters that were presented to and voted upon by our
shareholders, and the results of such shareholders votes. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
Nominee |
|
Votes For |
|
|
|
Abstentions |
|
Votes |
Michelle L. Collins |
|
73,608,861 |
|
334,612 |
|
66,480 |
|
- |
Casey G. Cowell |
|
73,893,447 |
|
50,331 |
|
66,174 |
|
- |
John A. Edwardson |
|
73,383,154 |
|
330,339 |
|
296,459 |
|
- |
Daniel S. Goldin |
|
73,909,721 |
|
34,184 |
|
66,047 |
|
- |
Thomas J. Hansen |
|
73,907,898 |
|
35,838 |
|
66,216 |
|
- |
Donald P. Jacobs |
|
73,890,310 |
|
54,583 |
|
65,059 |
|
- |
Stephan A. James |
|
73,890,376 |
|
53,362 |
|
66,215 |
|
- |
Michael P. Krasny |
|
73,145,479 |
|
799,106 |
|
65,368 |
|
- |
Terry L. Lengfelder |
|
73,895,995 |
|
47,814 |
|
66,143 |
|
- |
Susan D. Wellington |
|
73,889,028 |
|
55,641 |
|
65,283 |
|
- |
Brian E. Williams |
|
73,890,162 |
|
53,327 |
|
66,463 |
|
- |
| |
2. |
Ratification of the Selection of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm |
| |
| |
|
|
The ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent
registered public accounting firm, as auditors for the Company for the 2007
fiscal year. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Votes Against |
|
|
Abstentions |
|
|
Non-Votes |
73,577,438 |
|
|
348,955 |
|
|
|
83,559 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibits:
| |
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a14(a)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
| |
| |
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a14(a)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
| |
| |
32.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 |
| |
| |
32.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C 1350 |
25
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
CDW CORPORATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
|
August 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Barbara A. Klein
Barbara A. Klein
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Duly authorized officer and principal financial officer) |
|
|
26