Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q

þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
| EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 30, 2013
Or

¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
| EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _____ to _____
Commission file number: 001-14330
_____________________________________________
POLYMER GROUP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
_____________________________________________

Delaware |  | 57-1003983
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |  | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
9335 Harris Corners Parkway, Suite 300 Charlotte, North Carolina 28269 |  | (704) 697-5100
(Address of principal executive offices) |  | (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

____________________________________________
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ¨ No ý *
* The registrant is a voluntary filer of reports required to be filed by certain companies under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and has filed all reports that would have been required to have been filed by the registrant during the preceding 12 months had it been subject to such filing requirements during the entirety of such period.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer |  | ¨ | Accelerated filer |  | ¨
Non-accelerated filer |  | x (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company |  | ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No ý
Number of common shares outstanding at May 3, 2013: 1,000. There is no public trading of the registrant's shares.

Table of Contents
POLYMER GROUP, INC.
FORM 10-Q
INDEX

| Page
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION | 3
Item 1. Financial Statements | 3
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 28
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 40
Item 4. Controls and Procedures | 42
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION | 42
Item 1. Legal Proceedings | 42
Item 1A. Risk Factors | 42
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosure | 42
Item 5. Other Information | 42
Item 6. Exhibits | 43
Signatures | 44

2

Table of Contents
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
POLYMER GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

|  | (Unaudited) |  |
In thousands, except share data |  | March 30, 2013 |  | December 29, 2012
ASSETS |  |  |  |
Current assets: |  |  |  |
Cash and cash equivalents |  | $ | 74,627 |  |  | $ | 97,879 |
Accounts receivable, net |  | 139,848 |  |  | 131,569 |
Inventories, net |  | 96,892 |  |  | 94,964 |
Deferred income taxes |  | 3,806 |  |  | 3,832 |
Other current assets |  | 40,078 |  |  | 33,414 |
Total current assets |  | 355,251 |  |  | 361,658 |
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $119,170 and $106,134, respectively |  | 477,958 |  |  | 479,169 |
Goodwill |  | 80,712 |  |  | 80,608 |
Intangible assets, net |  | 73,637 |  |  | 75,663 |
Deferred income taxes |  | 1,222 |  |  | 945 |
Other noncurrent assets |  | 24,855 |  |  | 24,026 |
Total assets |  | $ | 1,013,635 |  |  | $ | 1,022,069 |
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY |  |  |  |
Current liabilities: |  |  |  |
Short-term borrowings |  | $ | 1,411 |  |  | $ | 813 |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |  | 193,176 |  |  | 196,905 |
Income taxes payable |  | 3,716 |  |  | 3,841 |
Deferred income taxes |  | 479 |  |  | 479 |
Current portion of long-term debt |  | 21,463 |  |  | 19,477 |
Total current liabilities |  | 220,245 |  |  | 221,515 |
Long-term debt |  | 583,199 |  |  | 579,399 |
Deferred income taxes |  | 33,045 |  |  | 33,181 |
Other noncurrent liabilities |  | 47,611 |  |  | 48,772 |
Total liabilities |  | 884,100 |  |  | 882,867 |
Commitments and contingencies |  |  |  |
Shareholders’ equity: |  |  |  |
Common stock — 1,000 shares issued and outstanding |  | — |  |  | — |
Additional paid-in capital |  | 256,416 |  |  | 256,180 |
Retained earnings (deficit) |  | (108,436 | ) |  | (102,209 | )
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |  | (18,445 | ) |  | (14,769 | )
Total shareholders' equity |  | 129,535 |  |  | 139,202 |
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity |  | $ | 1,013,635 |  |  | $ | 1,022,069 |

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3

Table of Contents
POLYMER GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)

In thousands | Three Months Ended March 30, 2013 |  | Three Months Ended March 31, 2012
Net sales | $ | 287,082 |  |  | $ | 295,171 |
Cost of goods sold | (241,216 | ) |  | (241,984 | )
Gross profit | 45,866 |  |  | 53,187 |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | (34,342 | ) |  | (34,131 | )
Special charges, net | (1,804 | ) |  | (2,419 | )
Other operating, net | (340 | ) |  | 361 |
Operating income (loss) | 9,380 |  |  | 16,998 |
Other income (expense): |  |  |
Interest expense | (12,084 | ) |  | (12,848 | )
Foreign currency and other, net | (1,420 | ) |  | 62 |
Income (loss) before income taxes | (4,124 | ) |  | 4,212 |
Income tax (provision) benefit | (2,103 | ) |  | (4,477 | )
Net income (loss) | $ | (6,227 | ) |  | $ | (265 | )
Other comprehensive income (loss): |  |  |
Currency translation | $ | (3,772 | ) |  | $ | 4,823 |
Employee postretirement benefits, net of tax | 96 |  |  | — |
Other comprehensive income (loss) | (3,676 | ) |  | 4,823 |
Comprehensive income (loss) | $ | (9,903 | ) |  | $ | 4,558 |

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4

Table of Contents
POLYMER GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(UNAUDITED)

In thousands | Common Stock |  | Additional Paid-in Capital |  | Retained Deficit |  | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |  | Total Equity
Shares |  | Amount |
Balance — December 29, 2012 | 1 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 256,180 |  |  | $ | (102,209 | ) |  | $ | (14,769 | ) |  | $ | 139,202 |
Net income (loss) | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (6,227 | ) |  | — |  |  | (6,227 | )
Share-based compensation | — |  |  | — |  |  | 236 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 236 |
Employee benefit plans, net of tax | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 96 |  |  | 96 |
Currency translation | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (3,772 | ) |  | (3,772 | )
Balance — March 30, 2013 | 1 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 256,416 |  |  | $ | (108,436 | ) |  | $ | (18,445 | ) |  | $ | 129,535 |

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
5

Table of Contents
POLYMER GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)

In thousands | Three Months Ended March 30, 2013 |  | Three Months Ended March 31, 2012
Operating activities: |  |  |
Net income (loss) | $ | (6,227 | ) |  | $ | (265 | )
Adjustments for non-cash transactions: |  |  |
Deferred income taxes | (28 | ) |  | — |
Depreciation and amortization expense | 16,152 |  |  | 15,852 |
(Gain) loss on financial instruments | — |  |  | (147 | )
(Gain) loss on sale of assets, net | 67 |  |  | (6 | )
Non-cash compensation | 236 |  |  | 204 |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |  |  |
Accounts receivable | (9,884 | ) |  | 428 |
Inventories | (3,246 | ) |  | 5,756 |
Other current assets | (6,364 | ) |  | (2,883 | )
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | (3,534 | ) |  | (2,381 | )
Other, net | (1,883 | ) |  | 3,056 |
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | (14,711 | ) |  | 19,614 |
Investing activities: |  |  |
Purchases of property, plant and equipment | (14,317 | ) |  | (13,312 | )
Proceeds from sale of assets | 11 |  |  | 1,657 |
Acquisition of intangibles and other | (53 | ) |  | (56 | )
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | (14,359 | ) |  | (11,711 | )
Financing activities: |  |  |
Proceeds from long-term borrowings | 6,666 |  |  | 24 |
Proceeds from short-term borrowings | 1,446 |  |  | 1,441 |
Repayment of long-term borrowings | (912 | ) |  | (940 | )
Repayment of short-term borrowings | (848 | ) |  | (2,072 | )
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 6,352 |  |  | (1,547 | )
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | (534 | ) |  | 523 |
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | (23,252 | ) |  | 6,879 |
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of period | 97,879 |  |  | 72,742 |
Cash and cash equivalents - end of period | $ | 74,627 |  |  | $ | 79,621 |
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |  |  |
Cash payments for interest | $ | 22,300 |  |  | $ | 23,537 |
Cash payments (receipts) for taxes, net | $ | 3,435 |  |  | $ | 2,720 |

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
6

Table of Contents
POLYMER GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 1. Description of Business
Polymer Group, Inc. (“Polymer” or “PGI”), a Delaware corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries (the “Company”) is a leading global innovator, manufacturer and marketer of engineered materials, primarily focused on the production of nonwoven products. The Company has one of the largest global platforms in the industry, with a total of 13 manufacturing and converting facilities located in 9 countries throughout the world. The Company operates through 4 reportable segments, with the main sources of revenue being the sales of primary and intermediate products to the hygiene, healthcare, wipes and industrial markets.
Note 2. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect the consolidated operations of the Company and have been prepared in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) as defined by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) within the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”). In the opinion of management, the accompanying consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, which include normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the consolidated results for the periods presented. The accompanying consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements included in the Polymer Group, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2012.
On January 28, 2011, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 4, 2010, the Company was acquired by affiliates of the Blackstone Group (“Blackstone”), along with certain members of the Company's management (the "Merger"), for an aggregate purchase price valued at $403.5 million. As a result, the Company became a privately-held company. The Merger was financed by $560.0 million in aggregate principal of debt financing as well as common equity capital. In addition, the Company repaid its existing outstanding debt. Although the Company continues to operate as the same legal entity subsequent to the Merger and related change in control, a new entity was created for accounting purposes as of January 28, 2011. As a result, the purchase price was allocated to assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair market values at the date of acquisition. Under the guidance of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 5J, “New Basis of Accounting Required in Certain Circumstances,” push-down accounting is required when such transactions result in an entity being substantially wholly-owned. Therefore, the basis in shares of common stock of the Company has been "pushed down" to the Company from Scorpio Holdings Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("Holdings") that owns 100% of the issued and outstanding stock of Scorpio Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("Parent") that owns 100% of the issued and outstanding common stock of the Company.
The Company's fiscal year is based on a 52 week period ending on the Saturday closest to each December 31. Therefore, the financial results of 53-week fiscal years, and the associated 14-week quarters, will not be comparable to the prior and subsequent 52-week fiscal years and the associated quarters having only 13 weeks. The three months ended March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012 each contain operating results for 13 weeks.
Note 3. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-02, "Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income" ("ASU 2013-02"), which requires an entity to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. In addition, ASU 2013-02 requires an entity to present, either on the face of the income statement or in the notes to the financial statements, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income but only if the amount reclassified is required under GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For other amounts, an entity is required to cross-reference to other disclosures required under GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. The amendments in ASU 2013-02 do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in the financial statements. ASU 2013-02 is effective prospectively for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of this guidance concerns disclosure only and did not have an impact on the Company's financial results. See Note 11 for additional information.
Note 4. Accounts Receivable Factoring Agreements
In the ordinary course of business, the Company may utilize accounts receivable factoring agreements with third-party financial institutions in order to accelerate its cash collections from product sales. In addition, these agreements provide the
7

Table of Contents
Company with the ability to limit credit exposure to potential bad debts, better management of costs relate to collections as well as enable customers to extend their credit terms. These agreements involve the ownership transfer of eligible trade accounts receivable, without recourse or discount, to a third party financial institution in exchange for cash.
The Company accounts for these transactions in accordance with ASC 860, "Transfers and Servicing" ("ASC 860"). ASC 860 allows for the ownership transfer of accounts receivable to qualify for sale treatment when the appropriate criteria is met, which permits the Company to present the balances sold under the program to be excluded from Accounts receivable, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Receivables are considered sold when they are transferred beyond the reach of the Company and its creditors, the purchaser has the right to pledge or exchange the receivables, and the Company has surrendered control over the transferred receivables. In addition, the Company provides no other forms of continued financial support to the purchaser of the receivables once the receivables are sold. Amounts due from financial institutions are recorded with Other current assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
The Company has a U.S. based program where certain U.S. based receivables are sold to an unrelated third-party financial institution. Under the current terms of the U.S. agreement, the maximum amount of outstanding advances at any one time is $20.0 million, which limitation is subject to change based on the level of eligible receivables, restrictions on concentrations of receivables and the historical performance of the receivables sold. In addition, the Company's subsidiaries in Mexico, Colombia, Spain and the Netherlands have entered into factoring agreements to sell certain receivables to unrelated third-party financial institutions. Under the terms of the non-U.S. agreements, the maximum amount of outstanding advances at any one time is $49.7 million, which limitation is subject to change based on the level of eligible receivables, restrictions on concentrations of receivables and the historical performance of the receivables sold.
The following is a summary of receivables sold to the third-party financial institutions that existed at the following balance sheet dates:

In thousands | March 30, 2013 |  | December 29, 2012
Trade receivables sold to financial institutions | $ | 54,844 |  |  | $ | 48,767 |
Amounts received from financial institutions | 47,314 |  |  | 41,937 |
Amounts due from financial institutions | $ | 7,530 |  |  | $ | 6,830 |

The Company sold $101.8 million and $88.8 million of receivables under the terms of the factoring agreements during the three months ended March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012, respectively. The increase is primarily related to the inclusion of the Netherlands, which entered into a factoring agreement in March 2012. The Company pays a factoring fee associated with the sale of receivables based on the dollar of the receivables sold. Amounts incurred were $0.3 million and $0.3 million during the three months ended March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012, respectively.
Note 5. Inventories, Net
At March 30, 2013 and December 29, 2012, the major classes of inventory were as follows:

In thousands | March 30, 2013 |  | December 29, 2012
Raw materials and supplies | $ | 42,438 |  |  | $ | 41,070 |
Work in process | 14,493 |  |  | 14,299 |
Finished goods | 39,961 |  |  | 39,595 |
Total | $ | 96,892 |  |  | $ | 94,964 |

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost, determined on the first-in, first-out ("FIFO") method, or fair market value. The Company performs periodic assessments to determine the existence of obsolete, slow-moving and non-saleable inventories and records necessary provisions to reduce such inventories to net realizable value. Reserve balances, primarily related to obsolete and slow-moving inventories, were $3.1 million and $3.3 million at March 30, 2013 and December 29, 2012, respectively.
Note 6. Intangible Assets
Indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested and reviewed annually for impairment during the fourth quarter or whenever there is a significant change in events or circumstances that indicate that the fair value of the asset may be less than the carrying amount of the asset. All other intangible assets with finite useful lives are being amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives.
8

Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the gross amount and accumulated amortization of the Company's intangible assets at March 30, 2013 and December 29, 2012:

In thousands | March 30, 2013 |  | December 29, 2012
Technology | $ | 31,900 |  |  | $ | 31,900 |
Customer relationships | 16,896 |  |  | 16,869 |
Loan acquisition costs | 19,472 |  |  | 19,472 |
Other | 498 |  |  | 446 |
Total gross finite-lived intangible assets | 68,766 |  |  | 68,687 |
Accumulated amortization | (18,629 | ) |  | (16,524 | )
Total net finite-lived intangible assets | 50,137 |  |  | 52,163 |
Tradenames (indefinite-lived) | 23,500 |  |  | 23,500 |
Total | $ | 73,637 |  |  | $ | 75,663 |

As of March 30, 2013, the Company had recorded intangible assets of $73.6 million. Included in this amount are loan acquisition costs incurred in association with the Merger. These expenditures represent the cost of obtaining financings that are capitalized in the balance sheet and amortized over the term of the loans to which such costs relate.
Amortization of intangible assets was $2.1 million and $2.1 million for the three months ended March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012, respectively, of which $0.6 million and $0.7 million were charged to Interest expense, respectively, related to the amortization of loan acquisition costs. Estimated amortization expense on existing intangible assets for each of the next five years, including fiscal year 2013, is expected to approximate $8 million in 2013, $7 million in 2014, $7 million in 2015, $7 million in 2016 and $7 million in 2017.
Note 7. Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities consist of the following:

In thousands | March 30, 2013 |  | December 29, 2012
Accounts payable to vendors | $ | 135,308 |  |  | $ | 127,969 |
Accrued salaries, wages, incentive compensation and other fringe benefits | 23,344 |  |  | 21,759 |
Accrued interest | 7,821 |  |  | 18,630 |
Other accrued expenses | 26,703 |  |  | 28,547 |
Total | $ | 193,176 |  |  | $ | 196,905 |

Note 8. Debt
The following table presents the Company's long-term debt at March 30, 2013 and December 29, 2012:

In thousands | March 30, 2013 |  | December 29, 2012
Senior Secured Notes | $ | 560,000 |  |  | $ | 560,000 |
ABL Facility | — |  |  | — |
Argentine Facility | 10,842 |  |  | 11,674 |
China credit facilities: |  |  |
China Credit Facility — Healthcare | 15,981 |  |  | 15,981 |
China Credit Facility — Hygiene | 17,642 |  |  | 10,977 |
Capital lease obligations | 197 |  |  | 244 |
Total debt | 604,662 |  |  | 598,876 |
Less: Current maturities | (21,463 | ) |  | (19,477 | )
Total long-term debt | $ | 583,199 |  |  | $ | 579,399 |

9

Table of Contents
The fair value of the Company's long-term debt was $649.0 million at March 30, 2013 and $640.0 million at December 29, 2012. The fair value of long-term debt is based upon quoted market prices in inactive markets or on available rates for debt with similar terms and maturities (Level 2).
Senior Secured Notes
In connection with the Merger, the Company issued $560.0 million of 7.75% Senior Secured Notes on January 28, 2011. The notes are due in 2019 and are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally on a senior secured basis, by each of the Polymer Group's wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries. Interest on the notes is paid semi-annually on February 1 and August 1.
The agreement governing the Senior Secured Notes, among other restrictions, limits the Company's ability and the ability of the Company's restricted subsidiaries to: (i) incur or guarantee additional debt or issue disqualified stock or preferred stock; (ii) pay dividends and make other distributions on, or redeem or repurchase, capital stock; (iii) make certain investments; (iv) repurchase stock; (v) incur certain liens; (vi) enter into transactions with affiliates; (vii) merge or consolidate; (viii) enter into agreements that restrict the ability of subsidiaries to make dividends or other payments to Polymer Group, Inc.; (ix) designate restricted subsidiaries as unrestricted subsidiaries; and (x) transfer or sell assets. However, subject to certain exceptions, the indenture permits the Company and its restricted subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness, including senior indebtedness and secured indebtedness. The indenture also does not limit the amount of additional indebtedness that Parent or its parent entities may incur.
Under the agreement governing the Senior Secured Notes and under the credit agreement governing the senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility, the Company's ability to engage in activities such as incurring additional indebtedness, making investments, refinancing certain indebtedness, paying dividends and entering into certain merger transactions is governed, in part, by the Company's ability to satisfy tests based on Adjusted EBITDA as defined in the indenture.
ABL Facility
In connection with the Merger, the Company entered into a senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility (the "ABL Facility") to provide for borrowings not to exceed $50.0 million, subject to borrowing base availability. The ABL Facility provides borrowing capacity available for letters of credit and borrowings on a same-day basis. The ABL Facility is comprised of (i) a revolving tranche of up to $42.5 million (“Tranche 1”) and (ii) a first-in, last out revolving tranche of up to $7.5 million (“Tranche 2”). Provided that no default or event of default was then existing or would arise therefrom, the Company had the option to request that the ABL Facility be increased by an amount not to exceed $20.0 million, subject to certain rights of the administrative agent, swing line lender and issuing banks with respect to the lenders providing commitments for such increase. The facility was set to expire on January 28, 2015.
On October 5, 2012, the Company entered into an amended and restated ABL Facility. The amended and restated facility extended the maturity date to October 5, 2016 as well as made certain pricing and other changes to the original agreement. The Company maintained the option to request that the ABL Facility be increased by an amount not to exceed $20.0 million, subject to certain rights of the administrative agent, swing line lender and issuing banks with respect to the lenders providing commitments for such increase. As of March 30, 2013, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under the ABL Facility. Borrowing base availability was $29.6 million, however, outstanding letters of credit in the aggregate amount of $11.0 million left $18.6 million available for additional borrowings. The aforementioned letters of credit were primarily provided to certain administrative service providers and financial institutions. None of these letters of credit had been drawn on as of March 30, 2013.
Based on current borrowing base availability, the borrowings under the ABL Facility will bear interest at a rate per annum equal to, at our option, either (A) Adjusted London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) (adjusted for statutory reserve requirements) plus (i) 2.00% in the case of Tranche 1 or (ii) 4.00% in the case of Tranche 2; or (B) the higher of (a) the administrative agent's Prime Rate and (b) the federal funds effective rate plus 0.5% (“ABR”) plus (x) 1.00% in the case of Tranche 1 or (y) 3.00% in the case of the Tranche 2.
The ABL Facility contains certain customary representations and warranties, affirmative covenants and events of default, including among other things payment defaults, breach of representations and warranties, covenant defaults, cross-defaults and cross acceleration to certain indebtedness, bankruptcy and insolvency defaults, certain events under ERISA, certain monetary judgment defaults, invalidity of guarantees or security interests, and change of control. If such an event of default occurs, the lenders under the ABL Facility would be entitled to take various actions, including the acceleration of amounts due under the ABL Facility and all actions permitted to be taken by a secured creditor.
10

Table of Contents
Argentine Facility
In January 2007, the Company's subsidiary in Argentina entered into an arrangement with banking institutions in Argentina in order to finance the installation of a new spunmelt line at its facility near Buenos Aires, Argentina. The maximum borrowings available under the facility, excluding any interest added to principal, were 33.5 million Argentine pesos with respect to an Argentine peso-denominated loan and $26.5 million with respect to a U.S. dollar-denominated loan. The loans are secured by pledges covering (i) the subsidiary's existing equipment lines; (ii) the outstanding stock of the subsidiary; and (iii) the new machinery and equipment being purchased, as well as a trust assignment agreement related to a portion of receivables due from certain major customers of the subsidiary.
The interest rate applicable to borrowings under these term loans is based on LIBOR plus 290 basis points for the U.S. dollar-denominated loan and Buenos Aires Interbanking Offered Rate plus 475 basis points for the Argentine peso-denominated loan. Principal and interest payments began in July 2008 with the loans maturing as follows: annual amounts of $3.5 million beginning in 2011 and continuing through 2015, and the remaining $1.7 million in 2016.
In connection with the Merger, the Company repaid and terminated the Argentine peso-denominated loan. In addition, the U.S. denominated loan was adjusted to reflect its fair value as of the date of the Merger. As a result, the Company recorded a contra-liability in Long-term debt and will amortize the balance over the remaining life of the facility. At March 30, 2013, the face amount of the outstanding indebtedness under the U.S. dollar-denominated loan was $11.2 million, with a carrying amount of $10.8 million and a weighted average interest rate of 3.19%.
China Credit Facility — Healthcare
In the third quarter of 2010, the Company's subsidiary in China entered into a three-year U.S. dollar denominated construction loan agreement (the “Healthcare Facility”) with a banking institution in China to finance a portion of the installation of the new spunmelt line at its manufacturing facility in Suzhou, China. The three-year term of the agreement began with the date of the first draw down on the Healthcare Facility, which occurred in fourth quarter of 2010. The interest rate applicable to borrowings is based on three-month LIBOR plus an amount to be determined at the time of funding based on the lender's internal head office lending rate (400 basis points at the time the credit agreement was executed), but in no event would the interest rate be less than 1-year LIBOR plus 250 points.
The maximum borrowings available under the facility, excluding any interest added to principal, were $20.0 million. The Company repaid $4.0 million of the principal balance in the fourth quarter of 2012. As a result, the outstanding balance under the Healthcare Facility was $16.0 million at December 29, 2012, with a weighted average interest rate of 5.44%. As of March 30, 2013, the outstanding balance under the Healthcare Facility was $16.0 million with a weighted-average interest rate of 5.42%. The outstanding balance is scheduled to be repaid during 2013 using a combination of existing cash balances and cash generated from operations.
China Credit Facility — Hygiene
On July 1, 2012, the Company's subsidiary in China entered into a three-year U.S. dollar denominated construction loan agreement (the “Hygiene Facility”) with a banking institution in China to finance a portion of the installation of a new spunmelt line at its manufacturing facility in Suzhou, China. The interest rate applicable to borrowings under the Hygiene Facility is based on three-month LIBOR plus an amount to be determined at the time of funding based on the lender's internal head office lending rate (520 basis points at the time the credit agreement was executed).
The maximum borrowings available under the facility, excluding any interest added to principal, were $25.0 million. As of December 29, 2012, the outstanding balance under the Hygiene Facility was $11.0 million with a weighted-average interest rate of 5.51%. As of March 30, 2013, the outstanding balance under the Hygiene Facility was $17.6 million with a weighted average interest rate of 5.48%. In addition, the Company had $9.4 million of outstanding letters of credit that expired during the three months ended March 30, 2013. The Company's first payment on the outstanding principal is due in late 2013.
Other Indebtedness
The Company periodically enters into short-term credit facilities in order to finance various liquidity requirements. At March 30, 2013, outstanding amounts related to such facilities were $1.4 million, which are being used to finance insurance premium payments. The weighted average interest rate on these borrowings was 2.44%. At December 29, 2012, amounts outstanding under these facilities was $0.8 million at a weighted average interest rate of 2.46%. Borrowings are included in Short-term borrowings in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
11

Table of Contents
The Company also has documentary letters of credit not associated with the ABL Facility, Healthcare Facility or the Hygiene Facility. These letters of credit were primarily provided to certain raw material vendors and amounted to $5.9 million and $6.9 million at March 30, 2013 and December 29, 2012, respectively. None of these letters of credit have been drawn upon.
Note 9. Derivative Instruments
In the normal course of business, the Company is exposed to certain risks arising from business operations and economic factors. These fluctuations can increase the cost of financing, investing and operating the business. The Company uses derivative financial instruments to help manage market risk and reduce the exposure to fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currencies. These financial instruments are not used for trading or other speculative purposes.
All derivatives are recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at their fair value as either assets or liabilities. On the date the derivative contract is entered into, the Company designates the derivative as (1) a hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or liability (fair value hedge), (2) a hedge of a forecasted transaction or the variability of cash flow to be paid (cash flow hedge), or (3) an undesignated instrument. Changes in the fair value of a derivative that is designated as a fair value hedge and determined to be highly effective are recorded in current earnings, along with the gain or loss on the recognized hedged asset or liability that is attributable to the hedged risk. Changes in the fair value of a derivative that is designated as a cash flow hedge and considered highly effective are recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) until they are reclassified to earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Changes in the fair value of undesignated derivative instruments and the ineffective portion of designated derivative instruments are reported in current earnings.
The Company formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as the risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. This process includes linking all derivatives that are designated as fair value hedges to specific assets and liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet and linking cash flow hedges to specific forecasted transactions or variability of cash flow to be paid.
The Company also formally assesses, both at the hedge's inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the designated derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flow of hedged items. When a derivative is determined not to be highly effective as a hedge or the underlying hedged transaction is no longer probable, hedge accounting is discontinued prospectively, in accordance with current accounting standards.
The following table presents the fair values of the Company's derivative instruments included within Accounts payable and accrued expenses on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 30, 2013 and December 29, 2012:

| As of March 30, 2013 |  | As of December 29, 2012
In thousands | Notional |  | Fair Value |  | Notional |  | Fair Value
Designated hedges: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Hygiene contracts | $ | 12,779 |  |  | $ | (1,309 | ) |  | $ | 22,554 |  |  | $ | (1,248 | )
Undesignated hedges: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Healthcare contracts | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Total | $ | 12,779 |  |  | $ | (1,309 | ) |  | $ | 22,554 |  |  | $ | (1,248 | )

Hygiene Contracts
On June 30, 2011, the Company entered into a series of foreign exchange forward contracts with a third-party financial institution used to minimize foreign exchange risk on certain future cash commitments related to the new hygiene line under construction in China (the "Hygiene Contracts"). The contracts allow the Company to purchase fixed amount of Euros on specified future dates, coinciding with the payment amounts and dates of equipment purchase contracts. The Hygiene Contracts qualify for hedge accounting treatment and are considered a fair value hedge; therefore, changes in the fair value of each contract is recorded in Foreign currency and other, net along with the gain or loss on the recognized hedged asset or liability that is attributable to the hedged risk. Since inception, the Company amended the equipment purchase contract on the hygiene line to which the Hygiene Contracts are linked. However, the Company modified the notional amounts of the Hygiene Contracts to synchronize with the underlying updated contract payments. As a result, the Hygiene Contracts remain highly effective and continue to qualify for hedge accounting treatment.
Healthcare Contracts
In January 2011, the Company entered into a series of foreign exchange forward contracts with a third-party financial institution used to minimize foreign exchange risk on certain future cash commitments related to the new healthcare line under
12

Table of Contents
construction in China (the "Healthcare Contracts"). The contracts allowed the Company to purchase fixed amount of Euros on specified future dates, coinciding with the payment amounts and dates of equipment purchase contracts. The Healthcare Contracts qualified for hedge accounting treatment and were considered a fair value hedge; therefore, changes in the fair value of each contract was recorded in Foreign currency and other, net along with the gain or loss on the recognized hedged asset or liability that was attributable to the hedged risk.
In July 2011, the Company completed commercial acceptance of the new healthcare line under construction in China and recorded a liability for the remaining balance due. As a result, the Company removed the hedge designation of the Healthcare Contracts and will continue to recognize changes in the fair value of the contracts in current earnings as an undesignated hedge. However, changes in the fair value of the hedged asset that is attributable to the hedged risk has been capitalized in the cost base of the healthcare line and no longer recognized in current earnings. During the first quarter of 2012, the Company remitted the final payment on the healthcare line and simultaneously fulfilled its obligations under the Healthcare Contracts.
The following table represents the amount of (gain) or loss associated with derivatives designated as hedges affecting Foreign currency and other, net in the Consolidated Statement of Operations:

In thousands | Three Months Ended March 30, 2013 |  | Three Months Ended March 31, 2012
Designated hedges: |  |  |
Hygiene contracts | 61 |  |  | (1,226 | )
Undesignated hedges: |  |  |
Healthcare contracts | — |  |  | (147 | )
Total | $ | 61 |  |  | $ | (1,373 | )

Gains and losses associated with the Company's designated fair value hedges are materially offset within Foreign currency and other, net by the changes in the fair value of the underlying transactions. However, once the hedge is undesignated, the fair value of the underlying transaction is no longer recognized in earnings.
Note 10. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The accounting standard for fair value measurements establishes a framework for measuring fair value that is based on the inputs market participants use to determine the fair value of an asset or liability and establishes a fair value hierarchy to prioritize those inputs. The fair value hierarchy is comprised of three levels that are described below:
Level 1 — Inputs based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 — Inputs other than Level 1 quoted prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs based on little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets and liabilities, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.
The fair value hierarchy requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Observable inputs are obtained from independent sources and can be validated by a third party, whereas unobservable inputs reflect assumptions regarding what a third party would use in pricing an asset or liability based on the best information available under the circumstances. A financial instrument's categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
The following tables present the fair value and hierarchy levels for the Company's assets and liabilities, which are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of the following periods:
13

Table of Contents

In thousands | Level 1 |  | Level 2 |  | Level 3 |  | March 30, 2013
Assets |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Firm commitment | $ | — |  |  | $ | 1,309 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 1,309 |
Liabilities |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Hygiene contracts | — |  |  | (1,309 | ) |  | — |  |  | (1,309 | )

In thousands | Level 1 |  | Level 2 |  | Level 3 |  | December 29, 2012
Assets |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Firm commitment | $ | — |  |  | $ | 1,248 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 1,248 |
Liabilities |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Hygiene contracts | — |  |  | (1,248 | ) |  | — |  |  | (1,248 | )

ASC 820 "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures" (ASC 820) defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The Company determines fair value of its financial assets and liabilities using the following methodologies:

• | Firm Commitment — Assets recognized associated with an unrecognized firm commitment to purchase equipment. The fair value of the assets is based upon indicative price information obtained from a third-party financial institution that is the counterparty to the transaction.

• | Derivative instruments — These instruments consist of foreign forward exchange contracts. The fair value is based upon indicative price information obtained from a third-party financial institution that is the counterparty to the transaction.

The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, inventories, short-term borrowings and accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their carrying values due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The methodologies used by the Company to determine the fair value of its financial assets and liabilities at March 30, 2013 are the same as those used at December 29, 2012. As a result, there have been no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 categories.
Level 2 to Level 1 assets -no
Level 1 to Level 2 liabilities - no
Level 2 to Level 1 liabilities - no
Note 11. Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plans
The Company and its subsidiaries sponsor multiple defined benefit plans that cover certain employees. Postretirement benefit plans, other than pensions, provide healthcare benefits for certain eligible employees. Benefits are primarily based on years of service and the employee’s compensation.
Pension Plans
The Company has both funded and unfunded pension benefit plans. It is the Company’s policy to fund such plans in accordance with applicable laws and regulations in order to ensure adequate funds are available in the plans to make benefit payments to plan participants and beneficiaries when required.
The components of the Company's pension related costs for the following periods are as follows:
14

Table of Contents

In thousands | Three Months Ended March 30, 2013 |  | Three Months Ended March 31, 2012
Service cost | $ | 844 |  |  | $ | 510 |
Interest cost | 1,391 |  |  | 1,442 |
Return on plan assets | (1,884 | ) |  | (1,616 | )
Curtailment / settlement (gain) loss | — |  |  | — |
Net amortization of: |  |  |
Transition costs and other | 88 |  |  | (16 | )
Net periodic benefit cost | $ | 439 |  |  | $ | 320 |

During the fourth quarter of 2012, the Company completed the liquidation of two pension plans related to its former Dominion Textile, Inc. business in Canada. All pension benefits legally owed to plan participants were fully paid from plan assets by the end of 2012. Excess plan assets left in the trust after all participants were paid was $0.3 million and is reported within Other current assets in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 29, 2012. The surplus was received by the Company in the first quarter of 2013. As a result of the liquidation of these plans during 2012, the Company recognized a settlement loss of $0.8 million within Special charges, net in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Operations.
The Company’s practice is to fund amounts for its qualified pension plans at least sufficient to meet the minimum requirements set forth in applicable employee benefit laws and local tax laws. In addition, the Company manages these plans to ensure that all present and future benefit obligations are met as they come due. During the three months ended March 30, 2013, employer contributions totaled $1.7 million. Full year contributions are expected to approximate $5.3 million.
Postretirement Plans
The Company sponsors several non-U.S. postretirement plans that provide healthcare benefits to cover certain eligible employees. These plans have no plan assets, but instead are funded by the Company on a pay-as-you-go basis in the form of direct benefit payments.
The components of the Company's postretirement related costs for the following periods are as follows:

In thousands | Three Months Ended March 30, 2013 |  | Three Months Ended March 31, 2012
Service cost | $ | 15 |  |  | $ | 18 |
Interest cost | 46 |  |  | 54 |
Curtailment / settlement (gain) loss | — |  |  | — |
Net amortization of: |  |  |
Transition costs and other | 9 |  |  | 6 |
Net periodic benefit cost | $ | 70 |  |  | $ | 78 |

For the three months ended March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012, reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) totaled $0.1 million and less than $0.1 million, respectively. These amounts related to net actuarial gains/losses included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost for both pension and postretirement benefit plans.
Defined Contribution Plans
The Company sponsors several defined contribution plans through its domestic subsidiaries covering employees who meet certain service requirements. The Company makes matching contributions to the plans based upon a percentage of the employee's contribution in the case of its 401(k) plans and makes safe harbor contributions based on the employee's eligibility to participate in the plan. In the case of the non-qualified Executive Retirement Plan, the Company does not make any contributions.
Note 12. Income Taxes
The Company accounts for its provision for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, "Income Taxes," which requires an estimate of the annual effective tax rate for the full year to be applied to the respective interim period, taking into account year-to-date amounts and projected results for the full year. For the three months ended March 30, 2013, the combination of the
15

Table of Contents
Company's income tax provision and recorded loss from operations before income taxes resulted in a negative 51.0% effective tax rate for the period. For the three months ended March 31, 2012, the effective tax rate was 106.3%. The effective tax rate for the three months ended March 30, 2013 is different than the Company's statutory tax rate primarily due to losses in certain jurisdictions for which no income tax benefits are anticipated, foreign withholding taxes for which tax credits are not anticipated, changes in the amounts of tax uncertainties and foreign taxes calculated at statutory rates different than the U.S. statutory rate.
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of (a) temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax reporting purposes and (b) operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. A valuation allowance is recorded when, based on the weight of the evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion, or all, of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. The realization of the deferred tax asset depends on the ability to generate sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character in the future and in the appropriate taxing jurisdiction. At March 30, 2013, the Company has a net deferred tax liability of $28.5 million.
At March 30, 2013, the Company had unrecognized tax benefits of $24.2 million, of which $11.4 million relates to accrued interest and penalties. These amounts are included within Other noncurrent liabilities within the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the Company's effective tax rate is $24.2 million as of March 30, 2013. Included in the balance as of March 30, 2013 is $4.2 million related to tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts could significantly change during the next twelve months. This amount is comprised of items which relate to the lapse of statute of limitations or the settlement of issues. The Company recognizes interest and/or penalties related to income taxes as a component of income tax expense.
Management judgment is required in determining tax provisions and evaluating tax positions. Although management believes its tax positions and related provisions reflected in the consolidated financial statements are fully supportable, it recognizes that these tax positions and related provisions may be challenged by various tax authorities. These tax positions and related provisions are reviewed on an ongoing basis and are adjusted as additional facts and information become available, including progress on tax audits, changes in interpretations of tax laws, developments in case law and closing of statute of limitations. The Company’s tax provision includes the impact of recording reserves and any changes thereto.
The major jurisdictions where the Company files income tax returns include the United States, Canada, China, the Netherlands, France, Germany, Spain, Mexico, Colombia, and Argentina. As of March 30, 2013, the Company has a number of open tax years with various taxing jurisdictions that range from 2003 to 2012. The results of current tax audits and reviews related to open tax years have not been finalized, and management believes that the ultimate outcomes of these audits and reviews will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Note 13. Special Charges, Net
As part of our business strategy, the Company incurs amounts related to corporate-level decisions or Board of Director actions. These actions are primarily associated with initiatives attributable to restructuring and realignment of manufacturing operations and management structures as well as the pursuit of certain transaction opportunities when applicable. In addition, the Company evaluates its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances including the aforementioned, indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. These amounts are included in Special charges, net in the Statement of Operations. A summary for each respective period is as follows:
16

Table of Contents

In thousands | Three Months Ended March 30, 2013 |  | Three Months Ended March 31, 2012
Restructuring and plant realignment costs |  |  |
Internal redesign and restructure of global operations | $ | 1,543 |  |  | $ | 747 |
Plant realignment costs | 96 |  |  | 673 |
IS support initiative | 7 |  |  | 277 |
Other restructure initiatives | — |  |  | 50 |
Total restructuring and plant realignment costs | 1,646 |  |  | 1,747 |
Acquisition and merger related costs |  |  |
Blackstone acquisition costs | — |  |  | 361 |
Total acquisition and merger related costs | — |  |  | 361 |
Other special charges |  |  |
Other charges | 158 |  |  | 311 |
Total other special charges | 158 |  |  | 311 |
Total special charges, net | $ | 1,804 |  |  | $ | 2,419 |

Restructuring and Plant Realignment Costs
Internal redesign and restructuring of global operations
During 2012, the Company initiated the internal redesign and restructuring of its global operations for the purposes of realigning and repositioning the Company to consolidate the benefits of its global footprint, align resources and capabilities with future growth opportunities and provide for a more efficient structure to serve existing markets. During the three months ended March 30, 2013, the Company incurred $1.5 million associated with this initiative, of which $1.2 million related to professional consulting fees and $0.1 million related to employee separations. Costs related to employee relocation, recruitment and other administrative costs were $0.2 million. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company incurred $0.7 million, which related to professional consulting fees.
Plant Realignment Costs
The Company incurs costs associated with ongoing restructuring initiatives intended to result in lower working capital levels and improve operating performance and profitability. Costs associated with these initiatives include improving manufacturing productivity, reducing headcount, realignment of management structures, reducing corporate costs and rationalizing certain assets, businesses and employee benefit programs. For the three months ended March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012, the Company incurred costs of $0.1 million and $0.7 million, respectively, associated with plant realignment initiatives primarily in the Americas and Europe regions.
IS Support Initiative
During 2012, the Company launched an initiative to utilize a third-party service provider for its Information Systems support tactical functions, including: service desk; desktop/end-user computing; server administration; network services; data center operations; database and applications development; and maintenance. For the three months ended March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012, the Company incurr ed less than $0.01 million and $0.3 million, respectively, associated with this initiative, which consisted primarily of employee separation and severance expenses.
Other Restructuring Initiatives
The Company incurs costs associated with less significant ongoing restructuring initiatives resulting from the continuous evaluation of opportunities to optimize the manufacturing process. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, costs associated with these initiatives were $0.1 million.
The changes in the restructuring reserves were as follows:
17

Table of Contents

In thousands | Three Months Ended March 30, 2013 |  | Three Months Ended March 31, 2012
Beginning balance | $ | 6,278 |  |  | $ | 1,100 |
Additions | 188 |  |  | 1,747 |
Cash payments | (2,535 | ) |  | (1,533 | )
Adjustments | (57 | ) |  | 39 |
Ending balance | $ | 3,874 |  |  | $ | 1,353 |

The Company accounts for its restructuring programs in accordance with ASC 712, "Compensation - Non-retirement Postemployment Benefits" ("ASC 712") and anticipates that the substantial majority of the remaining accrued liability will be paid by the end of 2013.
Acquisition and Merger Related Costs
Blackstone Acquisition Costs
As a result of the Merger on January 28, 2011, the Company incurred direct acquisition costs associated with the transaction including investment banking, legal, accounting and other fees for professional services. For the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company incurred $0.4 million of costs associated with the Merger.
Other Special Charges
Other Charges
Other charges consist primarily of expenses related to the Company’s pursuit of other business opportunities. The Company reviews its business operations on an ongoing basis in light of current and anticipated market conditions and other factors and, from time to time, may undertake certain actions in order to optimize overall business, performance or competitive position. To the extent any such decisions are made, the Company would likely incur costs associated with such actions, which could be material.
Note 14. Other Operating, Net
Transactions that are denominated in a currency other than an entity's functional currency are subject to changes in exchange rates with the resulting gains and losses recorded within current earnings. The Company includes these gains and losses related to receivables and payables as well as the impacts of other operating transactions as a component of Operating income (loss).
For the three months ended March 30, 2013, the Company recognized a loss of $0.3 million within Other operating, net. Amounts associated with foreign currency losses totaled $0.4 million and other miscellaneous income was $0.1 million. For the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company recognized income of $0.4 million associated with foreign currency gains.
Note 15. Foreign Currency and Other, Net
Transactions that are denominated in a currency other than an entity's functional currency are subject to changes in exchange rates with the resulting gains and losses recorded within current earnings. The Company includes these gains and losses related to intercompany loans and debt as well as other non-operating activities as a component of Other income (expense).
For the three months ended March 30, 2013, the Company recognized a loss of $1.4 million within Foreign currency and other, net. Amounts associated with foreign currency losses totaled $1.0 million and other non-operating expenses were $0.4 million. For the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company recognized income of $0.1 million. Amounts associated with foreign currency gains totaled $0.3 million, partially offset by other non-operating expenses of $0.2 million.
Note 16. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is involved from time to time in various litigations, claims and administrative proceedings arising out of the ordinary conduct of its business. Amounts recorded for identified contingent liabilities are estimates, which are reviewed periodically and adjusted to reflect additional information when it becomes available. Subject to the uncertainties inherent in estimating future costs for contingent liabilities, management believes that any liability which may result from these legal matters would not have a material adverse effect on the Company's business or financial condition.
18

Table of Contents
Environmental
The Company is subject to a broad range of federal, foreign, state and local laws and regulations relating to pollution and protection of the environment. The Company believes that it is currently in substantial compliance with applicable environmental requirements and does not currently anticipate any material adverse effect on its operations, financial or competitive position as a result of its efforts to comply with environmental requirements. Some risk of environmental liability is inherent, however, in the nature of the Company’s business and, accordingly, there can be no assurance that material environmental liabilities will not arise.
Equipment Lease Agreement
In the third quarter of 2011, the Company's state-of-the-art spunmelt line in Waynesboro, Virginia commenced commercial production. The plant expansion increased capacity to meet demand for nonwoven materials in the hygiene and healthcare applications in the U.S. The line was principally funded by a seven year equipment lease with a capitalized cost of $53.6 million. From the commencement of the lease to its fourth anniversary date, the Company will make annual lease payments of $8.3 million. From the fourth anniversary date to the end of the lease term, the Company's annual lease payments may change, as defined in the lease agreement. The aggregate monthly lease payments under the agreement, subject to adjustment, are expected to approximate $58 million. The lease includes covenants, events of default and other provisions that requires us to maintain certain financial ratios and other requirements.
China Hygiene Expansion
In the second quarter of 2011, the Company entered into a firm purchase agreement to acquire a spunmelt line to be installed in Suzhou, China that will manufacture nonwoven products primarily for the hygiene market. The Company plans to fund the project using a combination of existing cash balances, internal cash flows and the Hygiene Facility. As of March 30, 2013, the estimated total remaining project costs related to the firm commitment to purchase equipment was $12.8 million. As a result of the firm commitment being denominated in Euros, we entered into a series of foreign exchange forward contracts with a third-party financial institution to purchase fixed amount of Euros on specified future dates that coincide with the payment amounts and the dates of the payments.
Note 17. Segment Information
The Company is a leading global innovator, manufacturer and marketer of engineered materials, primarily focused on the production of nonwoven products. The Company operates through four segments, with the main source of revenue being the sales of primary and intermediate products to the hygiene, healthcare, wipes and industrial markets. The Company has one major customer that accounts for over 10% of its business, the loss of which would have a material adverse impact on reported financial results. Sales to this customer are reported within each of the the Nonwoven segments.
During 2012, the Company approved the internal redesign and restructuring of its global operations for the purposes of realigning and repositioning the Company to consolidate the benefits of its global footprint, align resources and capabilities with future growth opportunities and provide for a more efficient structure to serve existing markets. As part of the change, the Company eliminated the Latin America Nonwovens segment and merged it with the U.S. Nonwoven segment to create the Americas Nonwoven segment. The Company's segments are now as follows: Americas Nonwovens, Europe Nonwovens, Asia Nonwovens and Oriented Polymers segments. Segment information for all years has been revised to reflect the new structure.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies except that the segment results are prepared on a management basis that is consistent with the manner in which the Company desegregates financial information for internal review and decision making. Intercompany sales between the segments are eliminated.
Financial data by segment is as follows:
19

Table of Contents

In thousands | Three Months Ended March 30, 2013 |  | Three Months Ended March 31, 2012
Net sales |  |  |
Americas Nonwovens | $ | 153,004 |  |  | $ | 165,893 |
Europe Nonwovens | 78,274 |  |  | 75,667 |
Asia Nonwovens | 37,967 |  |  | 36,423 |
Oriented Polymers | 17,837 |  |  | 17,188 |
Total | $ | 287,082 |  |  | $ | 295,171 |
Operating income (loss) |  |  |
Americas Nonwovens | $ | 11,474 |  |  | $ | 19,289 |
Europe Nonwovens | 3,292 |  |  | 3,647 |
Asia Nonwovens | 4,553 |  |  | 4,011 |
Oriented Polymers | 1,593 |  |  | 1,677 |
Unallocated Corporate | (9,692 | ) |  | (9,368 | )
Eliminations | (36 | ) |  | 161 |
Subtotal | 11,184 |  |  | 19,417 |
Special charges, net | (1,804 | ) |  | (2,419 | )
Total | $ | 9,380 |  |  | $ | 16,998 |
Depreciation and amortization expense |  |  |
Americas Nonwovens | $ | 8,317 |  |  | $ | 8,337 |
Europe Nonwovens | 3,059 |  |  | 2,695 |
Asia Nonwovens | 3,389 |  |  | 3,317 |
Oriented Polymers | 348 |  |  | 381 |
Unallocated Corporate | 432 |  |  | 437 |
Subtotal | 15,545 |  |  | 15,167 |
Amortization of loan acquisition costs | 607 |  |  | 685 |
Total | $ | 16,152 |  |  | $ | 15,852 |
Capital spending |  |  |
Americas Nonwovens | $ | 818 |  |  | $ | 640 |
Europe Nonwovens | 548 |  |  | 2,243 |
Asia Nonwovens | 12,559 |  |  | 9,709 |
Oriented Polymers | 125 |  |  | 86 |
Corporate | 267 |  |  | 634 |
Total | $ | 14,317 |  |  | $ | 13,312 |

20

Table of Contents

In thousands | March 30, 2013 |  | December 29, 2012
Division assets |  |  |
Americas Nonwovens | $ | 494,577 |  |  | $ | 513,765 |
Europe Nonwovens | 197,831 |  |  | 202,139 |
Asia Nonwovens | 255,873 |  |  | 248,790 |
Oriented Polymers | 28,626 |  |  | 25,329 |
Corporate | 36,728 |  |  | 32,046 |
Total | $ | 1,013,635 |  |  | $ | 1,022,069 |

Note 18. Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions
In connection with the Merger, Holdings entered into a shareholders agreement (the “Shareholders Agreement”) with Blackstone and certain members of the Company's management. The Shareholders Agreement governs certain matters relating to ownership of Holdings, including the election of directors of our parent companies, restrictions on the issuance or transfer of shares, including tag-along rights and drag-along rights, other special corporate governance provisions and registration rights (including customary indemnification provisions). As of March 30, 2013, the Board of Directors of the Company includes three Blackstone members, three outside members and the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. Furthermore, Blackstone has the power to designate all of the members of the Board of Directors of the Company and the right to remove any or all directors, with or without cause.
Management Services Agreement
Upon the completion of the Merger, the Company became subject to a management services agreement (“Management Services Agreement”) with Blackstone Management Partners V L.L.C. (“BMP”), an affiliate of Blackstone. Under the Management Services Agreement, BMP (including through its affiliates) has agreed to provide certain monitoring, advisory and consulting services for an annual non-refundable advisory fee, to be paid at the beginning of each fiscal year, equal to the greater of (i) $3.0 million or (ii) 2.0% of the Company’s consolidated EBITDA (as defined under the credit agreement governing our ABL Facility) for the immediately preceding fiscal year. The amount of such fee shall be initially paid based on the Company’s then most current estimate of the Company’s projected EBITDA amount for the fiscal year immediately preceding the date upon which the advisory fee is paid. After completion of the fiscal year to which the fee relates and following the availability of audited financial statements for such period, the parties will recalculate the amount of such fee based on the actual consolidated EBITDA for such period and the Company or BMP, as applicable, shall adjust such payment as necessary based on the recalculated amount. Based on the Company’s fiscal 2012 financial performance, the advisory fee for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2012 remained at $3.0 million. With respect to the fiscal 2013 advisory fee, the Company paid $3.0 million during the first quarter of 2013. These amounts are included in Selling, general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Other Relationships
Blackstone and its affiliates have ownership interests in a broad range of companies. We may enter into commercial transactions in the ordinary course of our business with some of these companies, including the sale of goods and services and the purchase of goods and services.
Note 19. Financial Guarantees and Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements
Polymer’s Senior Secured Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally on a senior secured basis, by each of Polymer’s 100% owned domestic subsidiaries (collectively, the “Guarantors”). As substantially all of Polymer’s operating income and cash flow is generated by its subsidiaries, funds necessary to meet Polymer’s debt service obligations may be provided, in part, by distributions or advances from its subsidiaries. Under certain circumstances, contractual and legal restrictions, as well as the financial condition and operating requirements of Polymer’s subsidiaries, could limit Polymer’s ability to obtain cash from its subsidiaries for the purpose of meeting its debt service obligations, including the payment of principal and interest on the Senior Secured Notes. Although holders of the Senior Secured Notes will be direct creditors of Polymer’s principal direct subsidiaries by virtue of the guarantees, Polymer has subsidiaries that are not included among the Guarantors (collectively, the “Non-Guarantors”), and such subsidiaries will not be obligated with respect to the Senior Secured Notes. As a result, the claims of creditors of the Non-Guarantors will effectively have priority with respect to the assets and earnings of such companies over the claims of creditors of Polymer, including the holders of the Senior Secured Notes.
The following Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements are presented to satisfy the disclosure requirements of Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X. In accordance with Rule 3-10, the subsidiary guarantors are all 100% owned by PGI (the “Issuer”). The
21

Table of Contents
guarantees on the Senior Secured Notes are full and unconditional and all guarantees are joint and several. The information presents Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets as of March 30, 2013 and December 29, 2012 and Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations and Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012 of (1) PGI (Issuer), (2) the Guarantors, (3) the Non-Guarantors and (4) consolidating eliminations to arrive at the information for the Company on a consolidated basis.
The Company has made changes to its presentation of certain intercompany activities between PGI (Issuer), the Guarantors, the Non-Guarantors and corresponding Eliminations within its Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements contained herein. Certain prior period intercompany activities included in this note disclosure for the Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets, the Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations and the Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows have been recast to correct the classification of certain intercompany transactions. Management has determined that the adjustments were not material to prior periods and the nature of the changes is not material to the overall presentation. Accordingly, prior period Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets, the Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations and Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows included herein are not comparable to presentation included in prior period disclosures.
22

Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
As of March 30, 2013

In thousands | PGI (Issuer) |  | Guarantors |  | Non-Guarantors |  | Eliminations |  | Consolidated
ASSETS |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Current Assets: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 4,060 |  |  | $ | 15,234 |  |  | $ | 55,333 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 74,627 |
Accounts receivable, net | — |  |  | 24,913 |  |  | 114,935 |  |  | — |  |  | 139,848 |
Inventories, net | (52 | ) |  | 21,025 |  |  | 75,919 |  |  | — |  |  | 96,892 |
Deferred income taxes | — |  |  | 613 |  |  | 3,806 |  |  | (613 | ) |  | 3,806 |
Other current assets | 3,908 |  |  | 10,017 |  |  | 26,153 |  |  | — |  |  | 40,078 |
Total current assets | 7,916 |  |  | 71,802 |  |  | 276,146 |  |  | (613 | ) |  | 355,251 |
Property, plant and equipment, net | 38,212 |  |  | 96,687 |  |  | 343,059 |  |  | — |  |  | 477,958 |
Goodwill | — |  |  | 20,718 |  |  | 59,994 |  |  | — |  |  | 80,712 |
Intangible assets, net | 23,483 |  |  | 41,715 |  |  | 8,439 |  |  | — |  |  | 73,637 |
Net investment in and advances to (from) subsidiaries | 644,908 |  |  | 756,142 |  |  | (169,899 | ) |  | (1,231,151 | ) |  | — |
Deferred income taxes | — |  |  | — |  |  | 1,222 |  |  | — |  |  | 1,222 |
Other noncurrent assets | 306 |  |  | 5,645 |  |  | 18,904 |  |  | — |  |  | 24,855 |
Total assets | $ | 714,825 |  |  | $ | 992,709 |  |  | $ | 537,865 |  |  | $ | (1,231,764 | ) |  | $ | 1,013,635 |
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Current liabilities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Short-term borrowings | $ | 1,411 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 1,411 |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 17,985 |  |  | 38,875 |  |  | 136,316 |  |  | — |  |  | 193,176 |
Income taxes payable | — |  |  | — |  |  | 3,716 |  |  | — |  |  | 3,716 |
Deferred income taxes | 331 |  |  | — |  |  | 14 |  |  | 134 |  |  | 479 |
Current portion of long-term debt | 107 |  |  | — |  |  | 21,356 |  |  | — |  |  | 21,463 |
Total current liabilities | 19,834 |  |  | 38,875 |  |  | 161,402 |  |  | 134 |  |  | 220,245 |
Long-term debt | 560,019 |  |  | — |  |  | 23,180 |  |  | — |  |  | 583,199 |
Deferred income taxes | 273 |  |  | 9,149 |  |  | 24,370 |  |  | (747 | ) |  | 33,045 |
Other noncurrent liabilities | 5,164 |  |  | 14,935 |  |  | 27,512 |  |  | — |  |  | 47,611 |
Total liabilities | 585,290 |  |  | 62,959 |  |  | 236,464 |  |  | (613 | ) |  | 884,100 |
Common stock | — |  |  | — |  |  | 36,083 |  |  | (36,083 | ) |  | — |
Other shareholders’ equity | 129,535 |  |  | 929,750 |  |  | 265,318 |  |  | (1,195,068 | ) |  | 129,535 |
Total shareholders' equity | 129,535 |  |  | 929,750 |  |  | 301,401 |  |  | (1,231,151 | ) |  | 129,535 |
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity | $ | 714,825 |  |  | $ | 992,709 |  |  | $ | 537,865 |  |  | $ | (1,231,764 | ) |  | $ | 1,013,635 |

23

Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
As of December 29, 2012

In thousands | PGI (Issuer) |  | Guarantors |  | Non-Guarantors |  | Eliminations |  | Consolidated
ASSETS |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Current Assets: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 486 |  |  | $ | 28,285 |  |  | $ | 69,108 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 97,879 |
Accounts receivable, net | — |  |  | 22,350 |  |  | 109,219 |  |  | — |  |  | 131,569 |
Inventories, net | — |  |  | 23,843 |  |  | 71,121 |  |  | — |  |  | 94,964 |
Deferred income taxes | — |  |  | 613 |  |  | 3,832 |  |  | (613 | ) |  | 3,832 |
Other current assets | 1,821 |  |  | 7,710 |  |  | 23,883 |  |  | — |  |  | 33,414 |
Total current assets | 2,307 |  |  | 82,801 |  |  | 277,163 |  |  | (613 | ) |  | 361,658 |
Property, plant and equipment, net | 27,711 |  |  | 99,660 |  |  | 351,798 |  |  | — |  |  | 479,169 |
Goodwill | — |  |  | 20,718 |  |  | 59,890 |  |  | — |  |  | 80,608 |
Intangible assets, net | 24,313 |  |  | 42,422 |  |  | 8,928 |  |  | — |  |  | 75,663 |
Net investment in and advances to (from) subsidiaries | 679,818 |  |  | 723,861 |  |  | (188,670 | ) |  | (1,215,009 | ) |  | — |
Deferred income taxes | — |  |  | — |  |  | 945 |  |  | — |  |  | 945 |
Other noncurrent assets | 275 |  |  | 5,787 |  |  | 17,964 |  |  | — |  |  | 24,026 |
Total assets | $ | 734,424 |  |  | $ | 975,249 |  |  | $ | 528,018 |  |  | $ | (1,215,622 | ) |  | $ | 1,022,069 |
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Current liabilities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Short-term borrowings | $ | 813 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 813 |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 28,511 |  |  | 33,344 |  |  | 135,050 |  |  | — |  |  | 196,905 |
Income taxes payable | — |  |  | 89 |  |  | 3,752 |  |  | — |  |  | 3,841 |
Deferred income taxes | 331 |  |  | — |  |  | 14 |  |  | 134 |  |  | 479 |
Current portion of long-term debt | 107 |  |  | — |  |  | 19,370 |  |  | — |  |  | 19,477 |
Total current liabilities | 29,762 |  |  | 33,433 |  |  | 158,186 |  |  | 134 |  |  | 221,515 |
Long-term debt | 560,043 |  |  | — |  |  | 19,356 |  |  | — |  |  | 579,399 |
Deferred income taxes | 273 |  |  | 9,149 |  |  | 24,506 |  |  | (747 | ) |  | 33,181 |
Other noncurrent liabilities | 5,144 |  |  | 15,540 |  |  | 28,088 |  |  | — |  |  | 48,772 |
Total liabilities | 595,222 |  |  | 58,122 |  |  | 230,136 |  |  | (613 | ) |  | 882,867 |
Common stock | — |  |  | — |  |  | 36,083 |  |  | (36,083 | ) |  | — |
Other shareholders’ equity | 139,202 |  |  | 917,127 |  |  | 261,799 |  |  | (1,178,926 | ) |  | 139,202 |
Total shareholders' equity | 139,202 |  |  | 917,127 |  |  | 297,882 |  |  | (1,215,009 | ) |  | 139,202 |
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity | $ | 734,424 |  |  | $ | 975,249 |  |  | $ | 528,018 |  |  | $ | (1,215,622 | ) |  | $ | 1,022,069 |

24

Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
For the Three Months Ended March 30, 2013

In thousands | PGI (Issuer) |  | Guarantors |  | Non-Guarantors |  | Eliminations |  | Consolidated
Net sales | $ | — |  |  | $ | 93,012 |  |  | $ | 199,529 |  |  | $ | (5,459 | ) |  | $ | 287,082 |
Cost of goods sold | (25 | ) |  | (81,846 | ) |  | (164,804 | ) |  | 5,459 |  |  | (241,216 | )
Gross profit | (25 | ) |  | 11,166 |  |  | 34,725 |  |  | — |  |  | 45,866 |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | (9,644 | ) |  | (5,760 | ) |  | (18,938 | ) |  | — |  |  | (34,342 | )
Special charges, net | (1,354 | ) |  | (37 | ) |  | (413 | ) |  | — |  |  | (1,804 | )
Other operating, net | 2 |  |  | (76 | ) |  | (266 | ) |  | — |  |  | (340 | )
Operating income (loss) | (11,021 | ) |  | 5,293 |  |  | 15,108 |  |  | — |  |  | 9,380 |
Other income (expense): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Interest expense | (10,228 | ) |  | 3,101 |  |  | (4,957 | ) |  | — |  |  | (12,084 | )
Intercompany royalty and technical service fees | 1,327 |  |  | 1,607 |  |  | (2,934 | ) |  | — |  |  | — |
Foreign currency and other, net | (2 | ) |  | (97 | ) |  | (1,321 | ) |  | — |  |  | (1,420 | )
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries | 11,524 |  |  | 3,817 |  |  | — |  |  | (15,341 | ) |  | — |
Income (loss) before income taxes | (8,400 | ) |  | 13,721 |  |  | 5,896 |  |  | (15,341 | ) |  | (4,124 | )
Income tax (provision) benefit | 2,173 |  |  | (2,145 | ) |  | (2,131 | ) |  | — |  |  | (2,103 | )
Net income (loss) | $ | (6,227 | ) |  | $ | 11,576 |  |  | $ | 3,765 |  |  | $ | (15,341 | ) |  | $ | (6,227 | )
Comprehensive income (loss) | $ | (9,903 | ) |  | $ | 16,102 |  |  | $ | 5,384 |  |  | $ | (21,486 | ) |  | $ | (9,903 | )

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012

In thousands | PGI (Issuer) |  | Guarantors |  | Non-Guarantors |  | Eliminations |  | Consolidated
Net sales | $ | — |  |  | $ | 95,414 |  |  | $ | 204,541 |  |  | $ | (4,784 | ) |  | $ | 295,171 |
Cost of goods sold | 17 |  |  | (82,447 | ) |  | (164,338 | ) |  | 4,784 |  |  | (241,984 | )
Gross profit | 17 |  |  | 12,967 |  |  | 40,203 |  |  | — |  |  | 53,187 |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | (9,291 | ) |  | (5,917 | ) |  | (18,923 | ) |  | — |  |  | (34,131 | )
Special charges, net | (1,478 | ) |  | (216 | ) |  | (725 | ) |  | — |  |  | (2,419 | )
Other operating, net | — |  |  | 103 |  |  | 258 |  |  | — |  |  | 361 |
Operating income (loss) | (10,752 | ) |  | 6,937 |  |  | 20,813 |  |  | — |  |  | 16,998 |
Other income (expense): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Interest expense | (11,275 | ) |  | 3,315 |  |  | (4,888 | ) |  | — |  |  | (12,848 | )
Intercompany royalty and technical service fees | 1,490 |  |  | 1,811 |  |  | (3,301 | ) |  | — |  |  | — |
Foreign currency and other, net | (30 | ) |  | (163 | ) |  | 255 |  |  | — |  |  | 62 |
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries | 18,165 |  |  | 9,151 |  |  | — |  |  | (27,316 | ) |  | — |
Income (loss) before income taxes | (2,402 | ) |  | 21,051 |  |  | 12,879 |  |  | (27,316 | ) |  | 4,212 |
Income tax (provision) benefit | 2,137 |  |  | (2,832 | ) |  | (3,782 | ) |  | — |  |  | (4,477 | )
Net income (loss) | $ | (265 | ) |  | $ | 18,219 |  |  | $ | 9,097 |  |  | $ | (27,316 | ) |  | $ | (265 | )
Comprehensive income (loss) | $ | 4,558 |  |  | $ | 24,380 |  |  | $ | 12,228 |  |  | $ | (36,608 | ) |  | $ | 4,558 |

25

Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
For the Three Months Ended March 30, 2013

In thousands | PGI (Issuer) |  | Guarantors |  | Non-Guarantors |  | Eliminations |  | Consolidated
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | $ | (15,118 | ) |  | $ | 16,397 |  |  | $ | (15,990 | ) |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | (14,711 | )
Investing activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Purchases of property, plant and equipment | (10,592 | ) |  | (682 | ) |  | (3,043 | ) |  | — |  |  | (14,317 | )
Proceeds from the sale of assets | — |  |  | — |  |  | 11 |  |  | — |  |  | 11 |
Acquisition of intangibles and other | (53 | ) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (53 | )
Intercompany investing activities, net | 5,766 |  |  | (23,000 | ) |  | — |  |  | 17,234 |  |  | — |
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | (4,879 | ) |  | (23,682 | ) |  | (3,032 | ) |  | 17,234 |  |  | (14,359 | )
Financing activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Proceeds from long-term borrowings | — |  |  | — |  |  | 6,666 |  |  | — |  |  | 6,666 |
Proceeds from short-term borrowings | 1,446 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 1,446 |
Repayment of long-term borrowings | (27 | ) |  | — |  |  | (885 | ) |  | — |  |  | (912 | )
Repayment of short-term borrowings | (848 | ) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (848 | )
Intercompany financing activities, net | 23,000 |  |  | (5,766 | ) |  | — |  |  | (17,234 | ) |  | — |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 23,571 |  |  | (5,766 | ) |  | 5,781 |  |  | (17,234 | ) |  | 6,352 |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | — |  |  | — |  |  | (534 | ) |  | — |  |  | (534 | )
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | 3,574 |  |  | (13,051 | ) |  | (13,775 | ) |  | — |  |  | (23,252 | )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 486 |  |  | 28,285 |  |  | 69,108 |  |  | — |  |  | 97,879 |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 4,060 |  |  | $ | 15,234 |  |  | $ | 55,333 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 74,627 |

26

Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012

In thousands | PGI (Issuer) |  | Guarantors |  | Non-Guarantors |  | Eliminations |  | Consolidated
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | $ | (31,450 | ) |  | $ | 28,014 |  |  | $ | 23,050 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 19,614 |
Investing activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Purchases of property, plant and equipment | (8,316 | ) |  | (623 | ) |  | (4,373 | ) |  | — |  |  | (13,312 | )
Proceeds from the sale of assets | — |  |  | 1,646 |  |  | 11 |  |  | — |  |  | 1,657 |
Acquisition of intangibles and other | (56 | ) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (56 | )
Intercompany investing activities, net | 15,771 |  |  | (25,770 | ) |  | (8,781 | ) |  | 18,780 |  |  | — |
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 7,399 |  |  | (24,747 | ) |  | (13,143 | ) |  | 18,780 |  |  | (11,711 | )
Financing activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Proceeds from long-term borrowings | — |  |  | — |  |  | 24 |  |  | — |  |  | 24 |
Proceeds from short-term borrowings | 1,436 |  |  | — |  |  | 5 |  |  | — |  |  | 1,441 |
Repayment of long-term borrowings | (22 | ) |  | — |  |  | (918 | ) |  | — |  |  | (940 | )
Repayment of short-term borrowings | (72 | ) |  | — |  |  | (2,000 | ) |  | — |  |  | (2,072 | )
Intercompany financing activities, net | 25,770 |  |  | (6,990 | ) |  | — |  |  | (18,780 | ) |  | — |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 27,112 |  |  | (6,990 | ) |  | (2,889 | ) |  | (18,780 | ) |  | (1,547 | )
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | — |  |  | — |  |  | 523 |  |  | — |  |  | 523 |
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | 3,061 |  |  | (3,723 | ) |  | 7,541 |  |  | — |  |  | 6,879 |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 3,135 |  |  | 14,574 |  |  | 55,033 |  |  | — |  |  | 72,742 |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 6,196 |  |  | $ | 10,851 |  |  | $ | 62,574 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 79,621 |

27

Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis provides information which management believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding of our consolidated results of operations and financial condition. The discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in Part 1,Item 1 of this report. It should be noted that our gross profit margins may not be comparable to other companies since some entities classify shipping and handling costs in cost of goods sold and others, including us, include such costs in selling, general and administrative expenses. Similarly, some entities, including us, include foreign currency gains and losses resulting from operating activities as a component of operating income, and some entities classify all foreign currency gains and losses outside of operating income.
The terms "Polymer Group," " PGI," "the Company," "we," "us," and "our" and similar terms in this report refer to Polymer Group, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. The term "Parent" as used within this report refers to Scorpio Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation that owns 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Polymer Group, Inc. The term "Holdings" as used within this report refers to Scorpio Holdings Corporation, a Delaware corporation that owns 100% of the Parent.
Our Overview
We are a leading global innovator, manufacturer and marketer of engineered materials, focused primarily on the production of nonwoven products. Nonwovens are a high-performance and low-cost fabric-like alternative to traditional textiles, paper and other materials. They can be made with specific value-added characteristics including absorbency, tensile strength, softness and barrier properties, among others. Our nonwoven products are critical components used in consumer and industrial products, including hygiene, healthcare, wipes and industrial applications. Primary applications in each of our target markets are as follows:
•Hygiene: Baby diapers, feminine hygiene products and adult incontinence products
•Healthcare: Single-use surgical gowns and drapes, hospital apparel and infection control supplies
•Wipes: Household, personal care and commercial cleaning wipes
•Industrial: Filtration, cable wrap, house wrap, furniture and bedding, agriculture, landscape, industrial
packaging and other specialty areas
We have one of the largest global platforms in the industry, with a total of thirteen manufacturing and converting facilities located in nine countries throughout the world, including a significant presence in Asia and Latin America. Our manufacturing facilities are strategically located near many of our key customers in order to increase our effectiveness in addressing local and regional demand, as many of our products do not ship economically over long distances. We work closely with our customers, which include well-established multinational and regional consumer and industrial product manufacturers, to provide engineered solutions to meet increasing demand for more sophisticated products. We believe that we have one of the broadest and most advanced technology portfolios in the industry, and most importantly, one that is based on modern, sustainable manufacturing practices.
On January 28, 2011, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 4, 2010, we were acquired by affiliates of the Blackstone Group ("Blackstone"), along with certain members of our management (the "Merger"), for an aggregate purchase price valued at $403.5 million. As a result, we became a privately-held company. The Merger was financed by $560.0 million in aggregate principal of debt financing as well as common equity capital. In addition, we repaid our existing outstanding debt.
Our Industry
We compete primarily in the global nonwovens market, which management estimates to have exceeded $25 billion in 2012. Nonwovens are broadly defined as engineered sheet or web structures, made from polymers and/or natural fibers, that are bonded together by entangling fiber or filaments mechanically, thermally or chemically. They are flat sheets that are made directly from separate fibers or from molten plastic or plastic film. By definition, they are not made by weaving or knitting and do not require converting the fibers to yarn.
Nonwovens can be created through several different manufacturing techniques. Principal technologies utilized in the industry today include:

• | Spunmelt technology uses thermoplastic polymers that are melt-spun to manufacture continuous-filament fabrics.

28

Table of Contents

• | Carded technologies (chemical, thermal and spunlace) involve fibers laid on a conveyor belt, teased apart and consolidated into a web and then bonded with chemical adhesive, heat or high pressure water, respectively.

• | Air-laid technology uses high-velocity air to condense fibers.

• | Wet-laid technology drains fibers through a wire screen similar to papermaking.

The global nonwovens market has historically experienced stable growth and favorable pricing dynamics. However, since late 2010, several of our competitors announced an intent to install or installed additional capacity in excess of what we believe to be current market demand in the regions where we conduct business; specifically in the Americas, Europe and Asia. As additional nonwovens manufacturing capacity entered into commercial production, in excess of market demand, the short-term to mid-term excess supply created unfavorable market dynamics, resulting in a downward pressure on selling prices. As we look forward, we will be challenged by the fact that new nonwovens manufacturing capacity has either entered or will enter the regional markets in which we conduct business. As a result, we have taken a number of actions to refocus our global footprint and optimize our operations around disposable applications and high-growth markets.
Going forward, we believe the global nonwovens market will continue to be driven by:

• | Increase in global demand for disposable products driven by the increase in sanitary standards;

• | Increase in performance standards such as barrier properties, strength, softness and other attributes;

• | Global economic development coupled with the development of new nonwoven applications and technologies; and

• | Shift to materials and technology that deliver a lower total cost of use.

Our current global footprint, coupled with our access to capital, enables us to continue to realize cost synergies and greater growth from our core operations. In addition, we are investing in technology and new initiatives which we expect to help fuel our future growth. As a result, despite the current market environment, we believe we are well positioned to remain competitive within our markets as well as leverage our solid foundation across the company to drive future growth.
Recent Developments
On March 22, 2013, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company entered into an amendment to an existing Equipment Lease Agreement (the "Agreement') associated with our state-of-the-art spunmelt line in Waynesboro, Virginia, which commenced commercial production in the third quarter of 2011. The line was principally funded by a seven year equipment lease with a capitalized cost of $53.6 million. The amendment (i) amends the Total Leverage Ratio covenant in the Agreement to extend by one year each of the time periods in which the required Total Leverage Ratio “steps down” to a more restrictive ratio, (ii) amends the definition of Total Debt, which is used in the calculation of Total Leverage Ratio, to provide for the subtraction of the total amount of unrestricted cash from the aggregate principal amount of all indebtedness when calculating Total Debt, and (iii) removes our option to purchase the equipment on the second anniversary of the commencement date.
Results of Operations
We operate our business in four segments: Americas Nonwovens, Europe Nonwovens, Asia Nonwovens (collectively, the “Nonwovens Segments”) and Oriented Polymers. This reflects how the overall business is currently managed by our senior management and reviewed by the Board of Directors.
Gross Profit Drivers
Our net sales are driven principally by the following factors:

• | Volumes sold, which are tied to our available production capacity and customer demand for our products;

• | Prices, which are tied to the quality of our products, the overall supply and demand dynamics in our regional markets, and the cost of our raw material inputs, as changes in input costs have historically been passed through to customers through either contractual mechanisms or business practices. This can result in significant increases in total net sales during periods of sustained raw material cost increases as well as significant declines in net sales during periods of raw material cost declines; and

• | Product mix, which is tied to demand from various markets and customers, along with the type of available capacity and technological capabilities of our facilities and equipment. Average selling prices can vary for different product types, which impacts our total revenue trends.

29

Table of Contents
Our primary costs of goods sold (“COGS”) include:

• | Raw material costs (primarily polypropylene resins, which generally comprise over 75% of our raw material purchases) represent approximately 60% to 70% of COGS. We purchase raw materials, including polypropylene resins, from a number of qualified vendors located in the regions in which we operate. Polypropylene is a petroleum-based commodity material and its price historically has exhibited volatility. As discussed in the revenue factors above, we have historically been able to mitigate volatility in polypropylene prices through changes in our selling prices to customers, enabling us to maintain a more stable gross profit per kilogram;

• | Other variable costs include utilities (primarily electricity), direct labor, and variable overhead. Utility rates vary depending on the regional market and provider. In Asia, we have experienced a trend of increasing utility rates that we do not expect to stabilize in the near-term. Our focus on operating efficiencies and initiatives associated with sustainability has resulted in a general trend of lower kilowatts used per ton produced over the last three years. Labor generally represents less than 10% of COGS and varies by region. Historically, we have been able to mitigate wage rate inflation with operating initiatives resulting in higher productivity and improvements in throughput and yield; and

• | Fixed overhead consists primarily of depreciation expense, which is impacted by our level of capital investments and structural costs related to our locations. We believe our strategically located manufacturing facilities provide sufficient scale to maintain competitive unit manufacturing costs.

The level of our revenue and COGS vary due to changes in raw material cost. As a result, our gross profit margin as a percent of net sales can vary significantly from period to period. As such, we believe total gross profit provides a clearer representation of our operating trends. Changes in raw material costs historically have not resulted in a significant sustained impact on gross profit, as we have been able to effectively mitigate changes in raw material costs through changes in our selling prices to customers in order to maintain a more steady gross profit per kilogram sold. However, we are exposed to short-term changes in raw material cost, which can have an impact on our gross profit.
In addition, our sales are impacted by our selling prices, which is influenced by the cost of our raw material inputs. Historically, changes in input costs have been passed through to customers either by contractual mechanisms or business practices. This can result in significant increases in total net sales during periods of sustained raw material cost increases as well as significant declines in net sales during periods of raw material cost declines. As a result, financial statement items that use percentage of net sales as an economic indicator are influenced by the changes in our selling prices. In general, average prices for polypropylene resin and other raw material costs modestly trended downward throughout 2012. However, we have seen significant increases during the first three months of 2013 and expect the trend to continue through mid-year.
Three Months Ended March 30, 2013 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012
The following table sets forth the period change for each category of the Statement of Operations for the three months ended March 30, 2013 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2012, as well as each category as a percentage of net sales:
30

Table of Contents

|  |  |  |  |  | Percentage of Net Sales for the Respective Period End
In thousands | Three Months Ended March 31, 2013 |  | Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 |  | Period Change Favorable (Unfavorable) | March 31, 2013 | March 31, 2012
Net sales | $ | 287,082 |  |  | $ | 295,171 |  |  | $ | (8,089 | ) | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | %
Cost of goods sold: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Raw materials | (157,661 | ) |  | (158,857 | ) |  | 1,196 |  | 54.9 | % | 53.8 | %
Labor | (18,933 | ) |  | (19,534 | ) |  | 601 |  | 6.6 | % | 6.6 | %
Overhead | (64,622 | ) |  | (63,593 | ) |  | (1,029 | ) | 22.5 | % | 21.5 | %
Gross profit | 45,866 |  |  | 53,187 |  |  | (7,321 | ) | 16.0 | % | 18.0 | %
Selling, general and administrative expenses | (34,342 | ) |  | (34,131 | ) |  | (211 | ) | 12.0 | % | 11.6 | %
Special charges, net | (1,804 | ) |  | (2,419 | ) |  | 615 |  | 0.6 | % | 0.8 | %
Other operating, net | (340 | ) |  | 361 |  |  | (701 | ) | 0.1 | % | (0.1 | )%
Operating income (loss) | 9,380 |  |  | 16,998 |  |  | (7,618 | ) | 3.3 | % | 5.8 | %
Other income (expense): |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Interest expense | (12,084 | ) |  | (12,848 | ) |  | 764 |  | 4.2 | % | 4.4 | %
Foreign currency and other, net | (1,420 | ) |  | 62 |  |  | (1,482 | ) | 0.5 | % | — | %
Income (loss) before income taxes | (4,124 | ) |  | 4,212 |  |  | (8,336 | ) | (1.4 | )% | 1.4 | %
Income tax (provision) benefit | (2,103 | ) |  | (4,477 | ) |  | 2,374 |  | 0.7 | % | 1.5 | %
Income (loss) from continuing operations | (6,227 | ) |  | (265 | ) |  | (5,962 | ) | (2.2 | )% | (0.1 | )%
Discontinued operations, net | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  | — | % | — | %
Net income (loss) | (6,227 | ) |  | (265 | ) |  | (5,962 | ) | (2.2 | )% | (0.1 | )%
Less: Earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  | — | % | — | %
Net income (loss) attributable to Polymer Group, Inc | $ | (6,227 | ) |  | $ | (265 | ) |  | $ | (5,962 | ) | (2.2 | )% | (0.1 | )%

Net Sales
Net sales for the three months ended March 30, 2013 were $287.1 million, a $8.1 million decrease compared with the three months ended March 31, 2012. A reconciliation presenting the components of the period change by each of our operating divisions is as follows:

| Nonwovens |  | Oriented Polymers |  | Total
In millions | Americas |  | Europe |  | Asia |  | Total |
Beginning of period | $ | 165.9 |  |  | $ | 75.7 |  |  | $ | 36.4 |  |  | $ | 278.0 |  |  | $ | 17.2 |  |  | $ | 295.2 |
Changes due to: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Volume | (5.4 | ) |  | 1.1 |  |  | 1.3 |  |  | (3.0 | ) |  | 1.0 |  |  | (2.0 | )
Price/product mix | (7.5 | ) |  | 1.0 |  |  | 0.2 |  |  | (6.3 | ) |  | (0.3 | ) |  | (6.6 | )
Currency translation | — |  |  | 0.5 |  |  | 0.1 |  |  | 0.6 |  |  | (0.1 | ) |  | 0.5 |
Sub-total | (12.9 | ) |  | 2.6 |  |  | 1.6 |  |  | (8.7 | ) |  | 0.6 |  |  | (8.1 | )
End of period | $ | 153.0 |  |  | $ | 78.3 |  |  | $ | 38.0 |  |  | $ | 269.3 |  |  | $ | 17.8 |  |  | $ | 287.1 |

Nonwovens Segments:
Net sales for the three months ended March 30, 2013 were $269.3 million, a $8.7 million decrease compared with the three months ended March 31, 2012. The decrease in net sales was primarily driven by lower net selling prices of $7.5 million in the Americas. The pricing decrease, a result of raw material trends and a competitive pricing environment, was partially offset by higher net selling prices in Europe and Asia. Combined, these regions provided incremental growth of $1.2 million, which resulted from our passing through higher raw material costs associated with index-based selling agreements and market-based pricing trends. In addition, favorable foreign currency impacts of $0.6 million resulted in the higher translation of sales generated in foreign jurisdictions, particularly in Europe and Asia.
31

Table of Contents
For the three months ended March 30, 2013, volumes decreased by $3.0 million compared with the three months ended March 31, 2012. The decrease in volume was primarily driven by reductions in the Americas, particularly in Latin America, a result of a competitive pricing environment in certain markets. However, the volume reduction was partially offset by increased sales of industrial and wipe products in the Americas as demand increased with the overall markets. In addition, incremental growth of $1.3 million in Asia was primarily driven by higher volumes sold in the Hygiene markets as well as Healthcare product sales from the new spunmelt line installed in 2011. Higher volumes in Europe of $1.1 million were due to the stabilization of underlying demand in our industrial markets as well as additional volume for consumer disposables, particularly wipes.
Oriented Polymers
Net sales for the three months ended March 30, 2013 were $17.8 million, a $0.6 million increase compared with the three months ended March 31, 2012. The increase was primarily driven by an increase in volume attributable to higher demand in the building products market, offset in part by lower demand in the industrial packaging and agriculture markets. However, the volume increase was partially offset by lower net selling prices of $0.3 million, which resulted from our passing through lower raw material cost associated with index-based selling agreements and market-based pricing trends. In addition, unfavorable foreign currency impacts of $0.1 million resulted in lower translation of sales generated in foreign jurisdictions.
Gross Profit
Gross profit for the three months ended March 30, 2013 was $45.9 million, a $7.3 million decrease compared with the three months ended March 31, 2012. As a result, gross profit as a percentage of sales decreased to 16.0% from 18.0%. The decrease in gross margin was primarily driven by lower net selling prices, the result of raw material trends and a competitive pricing environment in the Americas. In addition, our higher overall cost for the raw materials of resin and fibers, especially polypropylene resin, contributed to the decrease. As a percentage of net sales, the raw material component of cost of goods sold increased to 54.9% from 53.8%. Our overhead component increased by $1.0 million primarily associated with volume-related manufacturing inefficiencies, particularly in the Americas. As a percentage of net sales, our overhead component increased to 22.5% from 21.5%. The decrease in gross profit was partially offset by our labor component of cost of goods sold which reflects the positive benefits of our plant consolidation activity in the U.S. implemented during 2012. For the three months ended March 31, 2013, our labor component decreased $0.6 million compared with the three months ended March 31, 2012. As a percentage of net sales, labor remained at 6.6% for each respective period.
Operating Income
Operating income for the three months ended March 30, 2013 was $9.4 million, a $7.6 million decrease compared with the three months ended March 31, 2012. A reconciliation presenting the components of the period change by each of our operating divisions is as follows:

| Nonwovens |  |  |  |  |  |
In millions | Americas |  | Europe |  | Asia |  | Total |  | Oriented Polymers |  | Corporate/ Other |  | Total
Beginning of period | $ | 19.3 |  |  | $ | 3.6 |  |  | $ | 4.0 |  |  | $ | 26.9 |  |  | $ | 1.7 |  |  | $ | (11.6 | ) |  | $ | 17.0 |
Changes due to: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Volume | (1.4 | ) |  | 1.2 |  |  | 0.3 |  |  | 0.1 |  |  | 0.2 |  |  | — |  |  | 0.3 |
Price/product mix | (7.5 | ) |  | 0.5 |  |  | 0.2 |  |  | (6.8 | ) |  | (0.3 | ) |  | — |  |  | (7.1 | )
Raw material cost | 0.3 |  |  | (1.0 | ) |  | (0.7 | ) |  | (1.4 | ) |  | 0.7 |  |  | (0.1 | ) |  | (0.8 | )
Manufacturing costs | 0.7 |  |  | (0.1 | ) |  | 0.9 |  |  | 1.5 |  |  | (0.8 | ) |  | — |  |  | 0.7 |
Currency translation | 0.3 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 0.3 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 0.3 |
Depreciation and amortization | — |  |  | (0.3 | ) |  | (0.1 | ) |  | (0.4 | ) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (0.4 | )
Special charges | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 0.6 |  |  | 0.6 |
All other | (0.2 | ) |  | (0.6 | ) |  | (0.1 | ) |  | (0.9 | ) |  | 0.1 |  |  | (0.4 | ) |  | (1.2 | )
Sub-total | (7.8 | ) |  | (0.3 | ) |  | 0.5 |  |  | (7.6 | ) |  | (0.1 | ) |  | 0.1 |  |  | (7.6 | )
End of period | $ | 11.5 |  |  | $ | 3.3 |  |  | $ | 4.5 |  |  | $ | 19.3 |  |  | $ | 1.6 |  |  | $ | (11.5 | ) |  | $ | 9.4 |

The amounts for acquisition and integration expenses as well as special charges have not been allocated to our reportable business divisions because our management does not evaluate such charges on a division-by-division basis. Division operating performance is measured and evaluated before such items.
32

Table of Contents
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 30, 2013 were $34.3 million, a $0.2 million increase compared with the three months ended March 31, 2012. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was primarily driven by a $1.5 million increase in shipping and handling costs as activity between regions increased with the ramp up of certain new products. Other factors contributing to the increase included $0.5 million associated with our our utilization of a third-party provider for information system support as well as $0.4 million associated with the reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses in connection with our management services agreement with Blackstone. These amounts were partially offset by cost reduction initiatives implemented during 2012 which reduced employee-related expenses such as salaries, benefits, short-term incentive compensation, travel and severance. Combined, these reductions totaled $1.4 million. Other reductions included $0.6 million related to research and development and $0.2 million related to favorable changes in foreign currency rates. As a result, selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales increased to 12.0% for the three months ended March 30, 2013 from 11.6% for the three months ended March 31, 2012.
Special Charges, net
As part of our business strategy, we incur costs related to corporate-level decisions or Board of Director actions. These actions are primarily associated with initiatives attributable to restructuring and realignment of manufacturing operations and management structures as well as the pursuit of certain transaction opportunities when applicable. In addition, we evaluate our long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances including the aforementioned, indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable.
Special charges for the three months ended March 30, 2013 were $1.8 million and consisted of the following components:

• | $1.5 million related to cost associated with our internal redesign and restructuring of global operations initiatives

• | $0.1 million related to separation and severance expenses associated with our plant realignment cost initiatives

• | $0.2 million related to other corporate initiatives

Special charges for the three months ended March 31, 2012 were $2.4 million and consisted of the following components:

• | $0.7 million related to cost associated with our internal redesign and restructuring of global operations initiatives

• | $0.7 million related to separation and severance expenses associated with our plant realignment cost initiatives

• | $0.3 million related to separation and severance expenses associated with our IS support initiative

• | $0.4 million related to professional fees and other transaction costs associated with the Merger

• | $0.3 million related to other corporate initiatives

The amounts included in Special charges, net have not been allocated to our reportable business divisions because our management does not evaluate such charges on a division-by-division basis. Division operating performance is measured and evaluated before such items.
Other Operating, net
Other operating expense for the three months ended March 30, 2013 was $0.3 million. Amounts associated with foreign currency losses on operating assets and liabilities totaled $0.4 million. These losses were partially offset by $0.1 million of other operating income. For the three months ended March 31, 2012, other operating income totaled $0.4 million, all of which was associated with foreign currency gains.
Other Income (Expense)
Interest expense for the three months ended March 30, 2013 was $12.1 million, a $0.7 million decrease compared to the three months ended March 31, 2012. Average outstanding debt levels and weighted-average interest rates have been consistent over each of the respective periods, however, amounts associated with capitalized interest increased by $0.5 million.
Foreign currency and other, net for the three months ended March 30, 2013 was an expense of $1.4 million. Amounts associated with foreign currency losses on non-operating assets and liabilities totaled $1.0 million. In addition, we incurred $0.4 million of other non-operating expenses. For the three months ended March 31, 2012, other operating income totaled $0.1 million, primarily associated with $0.3 million foreign currency gains on non-operating assets and liabilities. These amounts were partially offset by other non-operating expenses.
Income Tax (Provision) Benefit
33

Table of Contents
During the three months ended March 30, 2013, we recognized income tax provision of $2.1 million on consolidated pre-tax book loss from continuing operations of $4.1 million. The combination of our income tax provision and our recorded loss from operations before income taxes resulted in a negative 51.0% effective tax rate for the period. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we recognized an income tax provision of $4.5 million on consolidated pre-tax book income from continuing operations of $4.2 million. Our income tax expense in 2013 and 2012 is different than such expense determined at the U.S. federal statutory rate due to losses in certain jurisdictions for which no income tax benefits are anticipated, foreign withholding taxes for which tax credits are not anticipated, changes in the amounts recorded for tax uncertainties, foreign taxes calculated at statutory rates different than the U.S. federal statutory rate, and the application of intraperiod tax allocation rules.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following table contains several key indicators to measure our financial condition and liquidity:

In millions | March 30, 2013 |  | December 29, 2012
Balance Sheet Data: |  |  |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 74.6 |  |  | $ | 97.9 |
Operating working capital | 43.6 |  |  | 29.6 |
Total assets | 1,013.6 |  |  | 1,022.1 |
Total debt | 606.1 |  |  | 599.7 |
Total shareholders’ equity | 129.5 |  |  | 139.2 |
Debt-to-total capital | 82.4 | % |  | 81.2 | %

We assess our liquidity in terms of our ability to generate cash to fund our operating, investing and financing activities. In doing so, we review and analyze our current cash on hand, the number of days our sales are outstanding, inventory turns, capital expenditure commitments and income tax rates. Our cash requirements primarily consist of the following:
•Debt service requirements
•Funding of working capital
•Funding of capital expenditures
Our primary sources of liquidity include cash balances on hand, cash flows from operations, cash inflows from the sale of certain accounts receivables through our factoring arrangements and borrowing availability under our existing credit facilities and our ABL facility. We expect our cash on hand and cash flow from operations (which may fluctuate due to short-term operational requirements), combined with the current borrowing availability under our existing credit facilities and our ABL Facility, to provide sufficient liquidity to fund our current obligations, projected working capital requirements and capital spending during the next twelve month period and our ongoing operations, projected working capital requirements and capital spending during the foreseeable future.
On January 28, 2011, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 4, 2010, we were acquired by affiliates of Blackstone along with certain members of the Company's management for an aggregate purchase price of $403.5 million. As a result, we are significantly leveraged. Accordingly, our liquidity requirements are significant, primarily due to our debt service requirements. As of March 30, 2013, our total indebtedness was $606.1 million with a debt-to-capital ratio of 82.4%. Cash interest payments for the three months ended March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012 amounted to $22.3 million and $23.5 million, respectively. As of March 30, 2013, we had an additional $18.6 million of availability under our ABL Facility. The availability under our ABL Facility is determined in accordance with a borrowing base which can decline due to various factors. Therefore, amounts under our ABL Facility may not be available when we need them.
We currently have multiple intercompany loan agreements, and in certain circumstances, management services agreements in place that allow us to repatriate foreign subsidiary cash balances to the U.S. without being subject to significant amounts of either foreign jurisdiction withholding taxes or adverse U.S. taxation. In addition, our U.S. legal entities have royalty arrangements, associated with our foreign subsidiaries’ use of U.S. legal entities intellectual property rights that allow us to repatriate foreign subsidiary cash balances, subject to foreign jurisdiction withholding tax requirements, ranging from 5% to 10%. Should we decide to permanently repatriate foreign jurisdiction earnings by means of a dividend, the repatriated cash would be subject to foreign jurisdiction withholding tax requirements, ranging from 5% to 10%. We believe that any such dividend activity and the related tax effect would not be material.
At March 30, 2013, we had $74.6 million of cash and cash equivalents on hand, of which $55.3 million was held by our subsidiaries outside of the U.S., the majority of which was available for repatriation through various intercompany arrangements.
34

Table of Contents
In addition, our U.S. legal entities in the past have also borrowed cash, on a temporary basis, from our foreign subsidiaries to meet U.S. obligations via short-term intercompany loans. Our U.S. legal entities may in the future borrow from our foreign subsidiaries.
Our liquidity and our ability to fund our capital requirements is dependent on our future financial performance, which is subject to general economic, financial and other factors that are beyond our control and many of which are described under "Item 1A - Risk Factors" in our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K. If those factors significantly change or other unexpected factors adversely affect us, our business may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations or we may not be able to obtain future financings to meet our liquidity needs. We anticipate that to the extent additional liquidity is necessary to fund our operations, it would be funded through borrowings under our ABL Facility, incurring other indebtedness, additional equity financings or a combination of these potential sources of liquidity. We may not be able to obtain this additional liquidity on terms acceptable to us or at all.
Cash Flows
The following table sets forth the major categories of cash flows:

In millions | Three Months Ended March 30, 2013 |  | Three months Ended March 31, 2012
Cash Flow Data: |  |  |
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | $ | (14.7 | ) |  | $ | 19.6 |
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | (14.4 | ) |  | (11.7 | )
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 6.4 |  |  | (1.5 | )
Total | $ | (22.7 | ) |  | $ | 6.4 |

Operating Activities
Net cash used in operating activities for the three months ended March 30, 2013 was $14.7 million, of which working capital requirements used $23.0 million. The primary driver of the outflow related to a $9.9 million increase in accounts receivable, which resulted from our passing through higher raw material costs associated with index-based selling agreements and market-based pricing trends. At March 30, 2013, days sales outstanding was 44 days. Other current assets increased $6.4 million primarily due to the timing of prepaid items as well as the timing of payments from our factoring agents. In addition, inventory increased $3.2 million, primarily a result of the higher overall purchase price of raw materials. At March 30, 2013, inventory on hand was 37 days. Accounts payable and accruals decreased, which resulted in an outflow of $3.6 million. The decrease was primarily driven by the payment of interest on our Senior Secured Notes which was due during the current period. However, this amount was partially offset by the increase in trade accounts payable which was primarily driven by the timing of vendor purchases. As a result, accounts payable days was 73 days at March 30, 2013.
Net cash provided by operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was $19.6 million, of which $0.9 million was generated by changes in working capital. The primary driver of the inflow related to the reduction in inventory during the year due to the lower overall purchase price of raw materials and increased volumes sold during the period. The $5.8 million impact on net cash provided by operating activities reduced inventory on hand to 37 days at March 31, 2012 from 39 days at December 31, 2011. Accounts receivable provided $0.4 million during the three months ended March 31, 2012, keeping days sales outstanding at 44 days. These amounts were partially offset by an increase in other current assets and a decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, which reduced cash provided by operating activities by $2.9 million and $2.4 million, respectively. The increase in other current assets was driven by our prepaid expense balances as well as the timing of payments from factoring agents. The reduction on our accounts payable and accrued liabilities was driven by the payment of interest on our Senior Secured Notes partially offset by higher prices paid for raw materials. Accounts payable days was 70 days at March 31, 2012.
As sales volume and raw material costs vary, inventory and accounts receivable balances are expected to rise and fall accordingly, which in turn, result in changes in our levels of working capital and cash flows going forward. In addition, we review our business on an ongoing basis relative to current and expected market conditions, attempting to match our production capacity and cost structure to the demands of the markets in which we participate, and strive to continuously streamline our manufacturing operations consistent with world-class standards. Accordingly, in the future we may decide to undertake certain restructuring efforts to improve our competitive position. To the extent further decisions are made to restructure our business, such actions could result in cash restructuring charges and asset impairment charges, which could be material. Cash tax payments are significantly influenced by, among other things, actual operating results in each of our tax jurisdictions, changes in tax law, changes in our tax structure and any resolutions of uncertain tax positions.
Investing Activities
35

Table of Contents
Net cash used in investing activities for the three months ended March 30, 2013 was $14.4 million. The primary driver related to $14.3 million of property, plant and equipment expenditures associated with our manufacturing expansion project in China. In addition, other items included in our capital expenditures relates to machinery and equipment upgrades that extend the useful life and/or increased the functionality of the asset.
Net cash used in investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was $11.7 million. The primary driver related to $13.3 million of property, plant and equipment expenditures associated with our manufacturing expansion project in China. In addition, other items included in our capital expenditures relates to machinery and equipment upgrades that extend the useful life and/or increased the functionality of the asset. These amounts were partially offset by $1.7 million of proceeds recognized in the first quarter of 2012 associated with the sale of a former manufacturing facility in North Little Rock, Arkansas.
Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities for the three months ended March 30, 2013 was $6.4 million. Proceeds from borrowings totaled $8.1 million and primarily related to our credit facility in China funding our manufacturing expansion project in China. Other proceeds were related to short-term facilities. These amounts were partially offset by repayments of $1.7 million.
Net cash used in financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was $1.5 million. Proceeds from borrowings totaled $1.5 million and primarily related to short-term credit facilities used to finance insurance premium payments. These amounts were more than offset by repayments of $3.0 million, of which $2.1 million related to short-term borrowing.
Indebtedness
The following table summarizes our outstanding debt at March 30, 2013:

In thousands | Matures |  | Interest Rate |  | Outstanding Balance
Senior Secured Notes | 2019 |  | 7.75% |  | $ | 560,000 |
ABL Facility | 2016 |  | — |  | — |
Argentine Facility | 2016 |  | 3.19% |  | 10,842 |
China credit facilities: |  |  |  |  |
China Credit Facility — Healthcare | 2013 |  | 5.42% |  | 15,981 |
China Credit Facility — Hygiene | 2015 |  | 5.48% |  | 17,642 |
Capital lease obligations | 2013 - 2014 |  | 3.20% |  | 197 |
Total debt |  |  |  |  | 604,662 |
Less: Current maturities | 2013 |  | 2.46% |  | (21,463 | )
Total long-term debt |  |  |  |  | $ | 583,199 |

Senior Secured Notes
In connection with the Merger, we issued $560.0 million of 7.75% Senior Secured Notes on January 28, 2011. The notes are due in 2019 and are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally on a senior secured basis, by each of the Polymer Group's wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries. Interest on the notes is paid semi-annually on February 1 and August 1.
The agreement governing the Senior Secured Notes, among other restrictions, limits our ability and the ability of our restricted subsidiaries to: (i) incur or guarantee additional debt or issue disqualified stock or preferred stock; (ii) pay dividends and make other distributions on, or redeem or repurchase, capital stock; (iii) make certain investments; (iv) repurchase stock; (v) incur certain liens; (vi) enter into transactions with affiliates; (vii) merge or consolidate; (viii) enter into agreements that restrict the ability of subsidiaries to make dividends or other payments to Polymer Group, Inc.; (ix) designate restricted subsidiaries as unrestricted subsidiaries; and (x) transfer or sell assets. However, subject to certain exceptions, the indenture permits us and our restricted subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness, including senior indebtedness and secured indebtedness. The indenture also does not limit the amount of additional indebtedness that Parent or its parent entities may incur.
Under the agreement governing the Senior Secured Notes and under the credit agreement governing the senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility, our ability to engage in activities such as incurring additional indebtedness, making investments, refinancing certain indebtedness, paying dividends and entering into certain merger transactions is governed, in part, by our ability to satisfy tests based on Adjusted EBITDA as defined in the indenture.
ABL Facility
36

Table of Contents
In connection with the Merger, we entered into a senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility (the "ABL Facility") to provide for borrowings not to exceed $50.0 million, subject to borrowing base availability. The ABL Facility provides borrowing capacity available for letters of credit and borrowings on a same-day basis. The ABL Facility is comprised of (i) a revolving tranche of up to $42.5 million (“Tranche 1”) and (ii) a first-in, last out revolving tranche of up to $7.5 million (“Tranche 2”). Provided that no default or event of default was then existing or would arise therefrom, we had the option to request that the ABL Facility be increased by an amount not to exceed $20.0 million, subject to certain rights of the administrative agent, swing line lender and issuing banks with respect to the lenders providing commitments for such increase. The facility was set to expire on January 28, 2015.
On October 5, 2012, we entered into an amended and restated ABL Facility. The amended and restated facility extended the maturity date to October 5, 2016 as well as made certain pricing and other changes to the original agreement. We maintain the option to request that the ABL Facility be increased by an amount not to exceed $20.0 million, subject to certain rights of the administrative agent, swing line lender and issuing banks with respect to the lenders providing commitments for such increase. As of March 30, 2013, we had no outstanding borrowings under the ABL Facility. Borrowing base availability was $29.6 million, however, outstanding letters of credit in the aggregate amount of $11.0 million left $18.6 million available for additional borrowings. The aforementioned letters of credit were primarily provided to certain administrative service providers and financial institutions. None of these letters of credit had been drawn on as of March 30, 2013.
Based on current borrowing base availability, the borrowings under the ABL Facility will bear interest at a rate per annum equal to, at our option, either (A) Adjusted London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) (adjusted for statutory reserve requirements) plus (i) 2.00% in the case of Tranche 1 or (ii) 4.00% in the case of Tranche 2; or (B) the higher of (a) the administrative agent's Prime Rate and (b) the federal funds effective rate plus 0.5% (“ABR”) plus (x) 1.00% in the case of Tranche 1 or (y) 3.00% in the case of the Tranche 2.
The ABL Facility contains certain customary representations and warranties, affirmative covenants and events of default, including among other things payment defaults, breach of representations and warranties, covenant defaults, cross-defaults and cross acceleration to certain indebtedness, bankruptcy and insolvency defaults, certain events under ERISA, certain monetary judgment defaults, invalidity of guarantees or security interests, and change of control. If such an event of default occurs, the lenders under the ABL Facility would be entitled to take various actions, including the acceleration of amounts due under the ABL Facility and all actions permitted to be taken by a secured creditor.
Argentine Facility
In January 2007, our subsidiary in Argentina entered into an arrangement with banking institutions in Argentina in order to finance the installation of a new spunmelt line at its facility near Buenos Aires, Argentina. The maximum borrowings available under the facility, excluding any interest added to principal, were 33.5 million Argentine pesos with respect to an Argentine peso-denominated loan and $26.5 million with respect to a U.S. dollar-denominated loan. The loans are secured by pledges covering (i) the subsidiary's existing equipment lines; (ii) the outstanding stock of the subsidiary; and (iii) the new machinery and equipment being purchased, as well as a trust assignment agreement related to a portion of receivables due from certain major customers of the subsidiary.
The interest rate applicable to borrowings under these term loans is based on LIBOR plus 290 basis points for the U.S. dollar-denominated loan and Buenos Aires Interbanking Offered Rate plus 475 basis points for the Argentine peso-denominated loan. Principal and interest payments began in July 2008 with the loans maturing as follows: annual amounts of $3.5 million beginning in 2011 and continuing through 2015, and the remaining $1.7 million in 2016.
In connection with the Merger, we repaid and terminated the Argentine peso-denominated loans. In addition, the U.S. denominated loan was adjusted to reflect its fair value as of the date of the Merger. As a result, we recorded a contra-liability in Long-term debt and will amortize the balance over the remaining life of the facility. At March 30, 2013, the face amount of the outstanding indebtedness under the U.S. dollar-denominated loan was $11.2 million, with a carrying amount of $10.8 million and a weighted average interest rate of 3.19%.
China Credit Facility — Healthcare
In the third quarter of 2010, our subsidiary in China entered into a three-year U.S. dollar denominated construction loan agreement (the “Healthcare Facility”) with a banking institution in China to finance a portion of the installation of the new spunmelt line at its manufacturing facility in Suzhou, China. The three-year term of the agreement began with the date of the first draw down on the Healthcare Facility, which occurred in fourth quarter of 2010. The interest rate applicable to borrowings is based on three-month LIBOR plus an amount to be determined at the time of funding based on the lender's internal head office lending rate (400 basis points at the time the credit agreement was executed), but in no event would the interest rate be less than 1-year LIBOR plus 250 points.
37

Table of Contents
The maximum borrowings available under the facility, excluding any interest added to principal, were $20.0 million. We repaid $4.0 million of the principle balance in the fourth quarter of 2012. As a result, the outstanding balance under the Healthcare Facility was $16.0 million at December 29, 2012, with a weighted average interest rate of 5.44%. As of March 30, 2013, the outstanding balance under the Healthcare Facility was $16.0 million with a weighted-average interest rate of 5.42%. The outstanding balance is scheduled to be repaid during 2013 using a combination of existing cash balances and cash generated from operations.
China Credit Facility — Hygiene
On July 1, 2012, our subsidiary in China entered into a three-year U.S. dollar denominated construction loan agreement (the “Hygiene Facility”) with a banking institution in China to finance a portion of the installation of a new spunmelt line at its manufacturing facility in Suzhou, China. The interest rate applicable to borrowings under the Hygiene Facility is based on three-month LIBOR plus an amount to be determined at the time of funding based on the lender's internal head office lending rate (520 basis points at the time the credit agreement was executed).
The maximum borrowings available under the facility, excluding any interest added to principal, were $25.0 million. At December 29, 2012, the outstanding balance under the Hygiene Facility was $11.0 million with a weighted average interest rate of 5.51%. As of March 30, 2013, the outstanding balance under the Hygiene Facility was $17.6 million with a weighted-average interest rate of 5.48%. In addition, we had $9.4 million of outstanding letters of credit that expired during the three months ended March 30, 2013. Our first payment on the outstanding principal is due in late 2013.
Other Subsidiary Indebtedness
We periodically enter into short-term credit facilities in order to finance various liquidity requirements. At March 30, 2013, outstanding amounts related to such facilities were $1.4 million, which are being used to finance insurance premium payments. The weighted average interest rate on these borrowings was 2.44%. At December 29, 2012, amounts outstanding under these facilities were $0.8 million at a weighted average interest rate of 2.46%. Borrowings are included in Short-term borrowings in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
We also have documentary letters of credit not associated with the ABL Facility, Healthcare Facility or the Hygiene Facility. These letters of credit were primarily provided to certain raw material vendors and amounted to $5.9 and $6.9 million at March 30, 2013 and December 29, 2012, respectively. None of these letters of credit have been drawn on.
Factoring Agreements
In the ordinary course of business, we may utilize accounts receivable factoring arrangements with third-party financial institutions in order to accelerate its cash collections from product sales. These arrangements involve the ownership transfer of eligible U.S. and non-U.S. trade accounts receivable, without recourse or discount, to a third party financial institution in exchange for cash. The maximum amount of outstanding advances at any one time is $20.0 million under the U.S. based program and $49.7 million under the non-U.S. based program. At March 30, 2013, the net amount of trade accounts receivable sold to third-party financial institutions, and therefore excluded from our accounts receivable balance, was $54.8 million. Amounts due from the third-party financial institutions were $7.5 million at March 30, 2013. Factoring of our trade accounts receivable improves our cash conversion cycle. If we were to discontinue the use of these arrangements or if the amounts of receivables sold under these programs fluctuates significantly, we may experience short-term variability in our cash conversion cycle.
Covenant Compliance
We report our financial results in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States (“GAAP”). In addition, we present Adjusted EBITDA as a supplemental financial measure in order to provide a more complete understanding of the factors and trends affecting our business. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure that should be considered supplemental to, not a substitute for or superior to, the financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP. It has limitations in that it does not reflect all of the costs associated with the operations of our business as determined in accordance with GAAP. In addition, this measure may not be comparable to non-GAAP financial measures reported by other companies. We believe that Adjusted EBITDA provides important supplemental information to both management and investors regarding financial and business trends used in assessing our financial condition as well as provides additional information to investors about the calculation of, and compliance with, certain financial covenants in the agreement governing the Senior Secured Notes and in our ABL Facility. As a result, one should not consider Adjusted EBITDA in isolation or as a substitute for our results reported under GAAP. We compensate for these limitations by analyzing results on a GAAP basis as well as on a non-GAAP basis, predominantly disclosing GAAP results and providing reconciliations from GAAP results to non-GAAP results.
The following table shows a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA from the most directly comparable GAAP measure, Net income (loss) in order to show the differences in these measures of operating performance:
38

Table of Contents

In thousands | Three Months Ended March 30, 2013 |  | Three Months Ended March 31, 2012
Net income (loss) | $ | (6,227 | ) |  | $ | (265 | )
Interest expense, net | 12,084 |  |  | 12,848 |
Income and franchise tax | 2,121 |  |  | 4,494 |
Depreciation & amortization (a) | 15,545 |  |  | 15,167 |
Purchase accounting adjustments(b) | — |  |  | 262 |
Non-cash compensation (c) | 236 |  |  | 204 |
Special charges, net (d) | 1,804 |  |  | 2,419 |
Foreign currency and other non-operating, net (e) | 1,840 |  |  | (422 | )
Severance and relocation expenses (f) | 245 |  |  | 767 |
Unusual or non-recurring charges, net | 100 |  |  | 106 |
Business optimization expense (g) | 50 |  |  | 420 |
Management, monitoring and advisory fees (h) | 1,155 |  |  | 750 |
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 28,953 |  |  | $ | 36,750 |

(a) | Excludes amortization of loan acquisition costs that are included in interest expense.

(b) | Reflects fair market value adjustments as a result of purchase accounting associated with the Merger, primarily related to the step-up in inventory value.

(c) | Reflects non-cash compensation costs related to employee and director restricted stock, restricted stock units and stock options.

(d) | Reflects costs associated with non-cash asset impairment charges, the restructuring and realignment of manufacturing operations and management organizational structures, pursuit of certain transaction opportunities and other charges included in Special charges, net.

(e) | Reflects (gains) losses from foreign currency translation of intercompany loans, unrealized (gains) losses on interest rate and foreign currency hedging transactions, (gains) losses on sales of assets outside the ordinary course of business, factoring costs and certain other non-operating (gains) losses recorded in Foreign Currency and Other, net as well as (gains) losses from foreign currency transactions recorded in Other Operating, net.

(f) | Reflects severance and relocation expenses not included under Special charges, net.

(g) | Reflects costs incurred to improve IT and accounting functions, costs associated with establishing new facilities and certain other expenses.

(h) | Reflects management, monitoring and advisory fees paid under the Sponsor management agreement.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Recent Accounting Standards
In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-02, "Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income" ("ASU 2013-02"), which requires an entity to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. In addition, ASU 2013-02 requires an entity to present, either on the face of the income statement or in the notes to the financial statements, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income but only if the amount reclassified is required under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP") to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For other amounts, an entity is required to cross-reference to other disclosures required under GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. The amendments in ASU 2013-02 do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in the financial statements. ASU 2013-02 is effective prospectively for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of this guidance concerns disclosure only and did not have an impact on our financial results.
Critical Accounting Policies and Practices
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with those accounting principles requires management to use judgment in making estimates and assumptions based on the relevant information available at the end of each period. These estimates and assumptions have a significant effect on reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenue and expenses as well as the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities because they result primarily from the need to make estimates and assumptions on matters that are inherently uncertain. Actual results may differ from estimates.
39

Table of Contents
Management believes there have been no significant changes during the quarter ended March 30, 2013, to the items that we disclosed as our critical accounting policies and estimates in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2012.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
From time to time, we may publish forward-looking statements relative to matters, including, without limitation, anticipated financial performance, business prospects, technological developments, new product introductions, cost savings, research and development activities and similar matters. Forward-looking statements are generally accompanied by words such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “expect”, “forecast”, “intend”, “may”, “plans”, “predict”, “project”, “schedule”, “seeks”, “should”, “target” or other words that convey the uncertainty of future events or outcomes. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements.
Various statements contained in this report, including those that express a belief, expectation or intention, as well as those that are not statements of historical fact are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report.
These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions about future events. Although management considers these expectations and assumptions to be reasonable, they are inherently subject to significant business, economic, competitive, regulatory and other risks, contingencies and uncertainties, most of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control. There can be no assurance that these events will occur or that our results will be as anticipated. All forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing cautionary statements.
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in such forward-looking statements include, among other things:

• | general economic factors including, but not limited to, changes in interest rates, foreign currency translation rates, consumer confidence, trends in disposable income, changes in consumer demand for goods produced, and cyclical or other downturns;

• | cost and availability of raw materials, labor and natural and other resources, and our ability to pass raw material cost increases along to customers;

• | changes to selling prices to customers which are based, by contract, on an underlying raw material index;

• | substantial debt levels and potential inability to maintain sufficient liquidity to finance our operations and make necessary capital expenditures;

• | ability to meet existing debt covenants or obtain necessary waivers;

• | achievement of objectives for strategic acquisitions and dispositions;

• | ability to achieve successful or timely start-up of new or modified production lines;

• | reliance on major customers and suppliers;

• | domestic and foreign competition;

• | information and technological advances;

• | risks related to operations in foreign jurisdictions; and

• | changes in environmental laws and regulations, including climate change-related legislation and regulation.

The risks described in the “Risk Factors” section of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2012 are not exhaustive. Other sections of this Form 10-Q describe additional factors that could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for us to predict all such risk factors, nor can we assess the impact of all such risk factors on our business or the extent to which any factor or combination of factors may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligations to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to fluctuations in currency exchange rates, interest rates and commodity prices which could impact our results of operations and financial condition. As a result, we employ a financial risk management program, whose objective is to seek a reduction in the potential negative earnings impact of changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates and raw material
40

Table of Contents
pricing arising in our business activities. To manage these exposures, we primarily use operational means. However, to manage certain of these exposures, we used derivative instruments as described below. Derivative instruments utilized by us in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools, involve little complexity and are not used for trading or speculative purposes. To minimize the risk of counterparty non-performance, agreements are made only through major financial institutions with significant experience in such derivative instruments.
Long-Term Debt and Interest Rate Market Risk
Our objective in managing exposure to interest rate changes is to manage the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows as well as to minimize our overall borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives, we may use financial instruments such as interest rate swaps, in order to manage our mix of floating and fixed-rate debt.
The majority of our long-term financing consists of $560.0 million of 7.75% fixed-rate, Senior Secured Notes due 2019. However, the remaining portion of our indebtedness does have variable interest rates, for which we have not hedged the risks attributable to fluctuations in interest rates. Hypothetically, a 1% change in the interest rates affecting our outstanding variable interest rate subsidiary indebtedness, as of March 30, 2013, would change our interest expense by approximately $0.4 million.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
We have operations throughout the world that manufacture and sell their products in various international markets. As a result, we are exposed to movements in exchange rates of various currencies against the U.S. Dollar as well as against other currencies throughout the world. Such currency fluctuations have much less effect on our local operating results because we, to a significant extent, sell our products within the countries in which they are manufactured.
On June 30, 2011, we entered into a series of foreign exchange forward contracts with a third-party financial institution used to minimize foreign exchange risk on certain future cash commitments related to a new spunmelt line under construction in China. The contracts allow us to purchase fixed amounts of Euros on specified future dates, coinciding with the payment amounts and dates of equipment purchase contracts. At March 30, 2013, the remaining notional amount of these contracts was $12.8 million.
Raw Material and Commodity Risks
The primary raw materials used in the manufacture of most of our products are polypropylene resin, polyester fiber, polyethylene resin, and, to a lesser extent, rayon and tissue paper. The prices of polypropylene, polyethylene and polyester are a function of, among other things, manufacturing capacity, demand and the price of crude oil and natural gas liquids. In certain regions of the world, we may source certain key raw materials from a limited number of suppliers or on a sole source basis. In addition, to the extent that we cannot procure our raw material requirements from a local country supplier, we will import raw materials from outside refiners. We believe that the loss of any one or more of our suppliers would not have a long-term material adverse effect on us because other suppliers with whom we conduct business would be able to fulfill our long-term requirements. However, the loss of certain of our suppliers or the delay in the import of raw materials could, in the short-term, adversely affect our business until alternative supply arrangements are secured and the respective suppliers were qualified with our customers, or when importation delays of raw material are resolved. We have not historically experienced, and do not expect, any significant disruptions in the long-term supply of raw materials.
We have not historically hedged our exposure to raw material increases with synthetic financial instruments. However, we have certain customer contracts with price adjustment provisions which provide for index-based pass-through of changes in the underlying raw material costs, although there is often a delay between the time we incur the new raw material cost and the time that we are able to adjust the selling price to our customers. On a global basis, raw material costs continue to fluctuate in response to certain global economic factors, including the regional supply versus demand dynamics for the raw materials and the volatile price of oil.
In periods of rising raw material costs, to the extent we are not able to pass along price increases of raw materials, or to the extent any such price increases are delayed, our cost of goods sold would increase and our operating profit would correspondingly decrease. Based on budgeted purchase volumes for fiscal 2013, if the price of polypropylene was to rise $.01 per pound and we were not able to pass along any of such increase to our customers, we would realize a $6.1 million impact in our cost of goods sold. Significant increases in raw material prices that cannot be passed on to customers could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. In periods of declining raw material costs, if sales prices do not decrease at a corresponding rate, our cost of goods sold would decrease and our operating profit would correspondingly increase.
41

Table of Contents
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in Securities and Exchange Commission reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, the Company has evaluated the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures, as such item is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective, as of the end of the period covered by this report, in ensuring that information required to be disclosed in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the requisite time periods and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act during the three months ended March 30, 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are engaged in the defense of certain claims and lawsuits arising out of the ordinary course and conduct of our business, the outcomes of which are not determinable at this time. We have insurance policies covering such potential losses where such coverage is cost effective. In our opinion, any liability that might be incurred by us upon the resolution of these claims and lawsuits will not, in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
We are subject to a broad range of federal, foreign, state and local laws and regulations relating to pollution and protection of the environment. We believe that we are currently in substantial compliance with applicable environmental requirements and do not currently anticipate any material adverse effect on our operations, financial or competitive position as a result of our efforts to comply with environmental requirements. Some risk of environmental liability is inherent, however, in the nature of our business and, accordingly, there can be no assurance that material environmental liabilities will not arise.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
There have been no material changes to our risk factors contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2012.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
Not Applicable.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
Iran Related Disclosure
Under the Iran Threat Reduction and Syrian Human Rights Act of 2012, which added Section 13(r) of the Exchange Act, we are required to include certain disclosures in our periodic reports if we or any of our “affiliates” knowingly engaged in certain specified activities during the period covered by the report. Because the SEC defines the term “affiliate” broadly, it includes any entity controlled by us as well as any person or entity that controls us or is under common control with us (“control” is also defined broadly by the SEC). We are not presently aware that we have knowingly engaged in any transaction or dealing reportable under Section 13(r) of the Exchange Act during the three months ended March 30, 2013. Except as described below, we are not presently aware of any such reportable transactions or dealings by other such companies.
42

Table of Contents
Blackstone informed us that Hilton Worldwide, Inc, Travelport Limited, SunGard Capital Corp., SunGard Capital Corp. II and Sungard Data Systems, Inc., each being companies that may be considered one of its affiliates, included a disclosure in their current report on Form 10-Q as required by Section 13(r) of the Exchange Act. We have no involvement in or control over the activities of these companies, any of their respective predecessor companies or any of their subsidiaries, and we have not independently verified or participated in the preparation of any of their disclosures.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
(a) Exhibits
Exhibits required in connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are listed below.

Exhibit No. |  | Description
3.2 |  | Bylaws of the Company, as amended on February 20, 2013.
10.1 |  | Fourth Amendment to Equipment Lease Agreement, dated as of March 22, 2013, between Chicopee, Inc., as Lessee and Gossamer Holdings, LLC, as Lessor.
31.1 |  | Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by the Chief Executive Officer
31.2 |  | Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by the Chief Financial Officer
32.1 |  | Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by the Chief Executive Officer
32.2 |  | Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by the Chief Financial Officer
101 |  | The following materials from the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 30, 2013, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii) Consolidated Statement of Operations; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

43

Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Signature |  | Title |  | Date
/s/ Veronica M. Hagen |  |  |  |
Veronica M. Hagen |  | President and Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer) |  | May 9, 2013
/s/ Dennis E. Norman |  |  |  |
Dennis E. Norman |  | Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |  | May 9, 2013
/s/ James L. Anderson |  |  |  |
James L. Anderson |  | Vice President & Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) |  | May 9, 2013

44