e10vq

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 5, 2006

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q


þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006


o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 0-21059

ACE*COMM CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Maryland		52-1283030

(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(IRS Employer ID Number)

704 Quince Orchard Road, Gaithersburg, MD		20878
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

301-721-3000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act):
Yes o No þ

The number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of May 2, 2006 was 17,682,532.

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ACE*COMM CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands except share and per share amounts)


	March 31,			June 30,
	2006			2005
	(Unaudited)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	985		$	2,683
Accounts receivable, net		7,406			4,870
Inventories, net		959			532
Deferred contract costs		18			85
Prepaid expenses and other		653			601

Total current assets		10,021			8,771
Property and equipment, net		794			636
Goodwill		522			1,681
Acquired intangibles, net		1,049			2,001
Other non-current assets		849			478
Total assets	$	13,235		$	13,567


Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Current liabilities:
Borrowings	$	2,158		$	2,332
Accounts payable		939			1,379
Accrued expenses		1,551			1,940
Accrued compensation		899			1,013
Deferred revenue		1,700			1,454

Total current liabilities		7,247			8,118
Long-term notes payable		33			72

Total liabilities		7,280			8,190


Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding		—			—
Common stock, $.01 par value, 45,000,000 shares authorized, 17,550,297 and 16,694,330 shares issued and outstanding		176			167
Additional paid-in capital		34,679			34,808
Other accumulated comprehensive loss		(146	)		(32	)
Accumulated deficit		(28,754	)		(29,566	)
Total stockholders’ equity		5,955			5,377

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	13,235		$	13,567

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

ACE*COMM CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)


	For the three months ended					For the nine months ended
	March 31,					March 31,
	2006		2005			2006		2005
	(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)
Revenue
Licenses and hardware	$	3,509	$	1,066		$	10,161	$	5,212
Services		3,194		2,694			9,966		7,985

Total revenue		6,703		3,760			20,127		13,197

Cost of licenses and hardware revenue		323		742			1,805		2,193
Cost of services revenue		1,972		1,253			5,272		3,919

Total cost of revenue		2,295		1,995			7,077		6,112

Gross profit		4,408		1,765			13,050		7,085

Selling, general, and administrative		3,080		2,548			9,237		7,169
Research and development		872		631			2,826		1,745
Acquired in process research and development		—		5,118			—		5,118
Income (loss) from operations		456		(6,532	)		987		(6,947	)
Interest expense		91		16			174		24
Gain from settlement of debt obligation		—		—			—		228
Income (loss) before income taxes		365		(6,548	)		813		(6,743	)
Income tax expense		—		45			1		60

Net income (loss)	$	365	$	(6,593	)	$	812	$	(6,803	)


Basic net income (loss) per share	$	.02	$	(.47	)	$	.05	$	(.49	)

Diluted net income (loss) per share	$	.02	$	(.47	)	$	.05	$	(.49	)


Shares used in computing net income (loss) per share:
Basic		16,889		13,981			16,838		13,844

Diluted		17,679		13,981			17,351		13,844

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

ACE*COMM CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)


	For the nine months ended March 31,
	2006			2005
	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	812		$	(6,803	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		1,058			455
Provision for doubtful accounts		107			157
Gain from settlement of debt obligation		—			(228	)
In process research and development costs acquired		—			5,118
Restricted stock compensation expense		42			—
Stock option compensation expense		78			—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(2,643	)		(261	)
Inventories, net		(20	)		(104	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		(52	)		(130	)
Deferred contract costs		67			347
Accounts payable		(440	)		116
Accrued liabilities		(666	)		321
Deferred revenue		246			(150	)

Net cash used in operating activities		(1,411	)		(1,162	)


Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment		(507	)		(190	)
2helix acquisition		—			392
Purchase of certificate of deposit for letter of credit		—			(500	)
Contract rights acquired from Intasys		—			(100	)
Purchases of other non-current assets		(338	)		—

Net cash used in investing activities		(845	)		(398	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net borrowings on line of credit		200			160
Other notes payable		(38	)		—
Net proceeds from private financing transaction		—			2,131
Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan and exercise of stock options		488			73
Net cash provided by financing activities		650			2,364

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(1,606	)		804
Effect of exchange rate change on cash		(92	)		50
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		2,683			2,881
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	985		$	3,735

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for Interest	$	154		$	32
Cash paid during the period for Income taxes	$	1		$	15
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Issuance of common stock in connection with software purchase	$	791		$	—
Issuance of common stock in connection with 2helix purchase	$	—		$	5,508
Return of common stock in connection with the 2helix re-negotiation	$	1,521		$	—
Reduction of notes payable and accrued interest in connection with the	$	356		$	—
2helix re-negotiation
Issuance of common stock related to the grant of restricted stock	$	349		$	—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

ACE*COMM CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 1 — ORGANIZATION

ACE*COMM Corporation (the “Company”), incorporated in Maryland in 1983, delivers enterprise telemanagement applications and advanced Convergent Mediation™ solutions to wired and wireless voice, data, and Internet communications providers. ACE*COMM’s technology enables the capture, security, validation, correlation, augmentation, and warehousing of data from network elements and distributes it in appropriate formats to OSS (“Operations Support Systems”) and BSS (“Business Support Systems”) operations. ACE*COMM’s products are tailored to each customer’s needs, providing the capabilities to extract knowledge from their networks—knowledge they use to reduce costs, accelerate time-to-market for new products and services, generate new sources of revenue, and push forward with next-generation initiatives.

ACE*COMM Corporation, and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Solutions ACE*COMM Corporation, incorporated in Quebec in 1996, ACE*COMM Solutions UK Limited, incorporated in the United Kingdom in 2003, ACE*COMM Solutions Australia Pty Limited, incorporated in Australia in 2004, i3 Mobile acquired in December 2003 and Double Helix Solutions Limited acquired in March 2005, are referred to in this document collectively as ACE*COMM, unless otherwise noted or the context indicates otherwise. All inter-company transactions have been eliminated.

NOTE 2 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared by ACE*COMM Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries (the “Company”) in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) for interim financial statements and pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission for Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. Accordingly, certain information and footnotes required by US GAAP for complete financial statements of the type included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K are not required to be included in and have been omitted from this report. It is the opinion of management that all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included, and that all such adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature. Operating results for the periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any future periods. For further information, refer to the audited financial statements and footnotes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2005.

Use of estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates inherent in the preparation of the accompanying financial statements include: management’s forecasts of contract costs and progress toward completion, which are used to determine revenue recognition under the percentage-of-completion method; estimates of allowances for doubtful accounts receivable and inventory obsolescence; impairment of long-lived assets; and tax valuation allowances.

Earnings (Loss) per Share

The basic net earnings (loss) per share presented in the accompanying financial statements is computed using weighted average common shares outstanding. Diluted net earnings per share generally includes the effect, if dilutive, of potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock (e.g. stock options and warrants) were exercised and converted to common stock.

Revenue Recognition

ACE*COMM derives revenues primarily from contracts with telecommunication carriers and large enterprises for hardware, software license fees, professional services, and maintenance and support fees. These products and services are formalized in a multiple element arrangement involving application of existing software capabilities or modification of the underlying software and implementation services. Our software licenses to end-users generally provide for an initial license fee to use the

product in perpetuity. Under certain contracts, ACE*COMM licenses its software to resellers for subsequent modification and resale. Our customers, including resellers, do not possess the right to return or exchange products. Subscription revenue, included in Operational Support Systems revenue, is recognized on a monthly basis based upon the number of telephone subscribers of our customers.

We often enter into multiple element arrangements that do not involve significant modification or customization of the related software. In these instances, ACE*COMM recognizes revenue in accordance with AICPA Statement of Position 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition,” and allocates revenue to each element of the arrangement based on objective evidence of the element’s fair value. Revenue for software licenses in these instances is recognized upon delivery (i.e. transfer of title), when a signed agreement exists, the fee is fixed and determinable, and collection of the resulting receivable is probable. Maintenance revenue is recognized ratably over the term of the respective maintenance period.

In situations when our products involve significant modification or customization of software, or when our systems integration and product development are essential to the functionality of the software, revenues relating to the software licenses and services are aggregated and the combined revenues are recognized on a percentage-of-completion basis. Approximately 8% and 10% of our revenues were calculated under this method for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2006, respectively. The hardware revenue on these contracts is recognized upon transfer of title, which generally occurs at the same time the licensed software is delivered as the majority of the hardware is from third parties and the hardware is rarely modified.

Revenue recognized using the percentage-of-completion method is based on the estimated stage of completion of individual contracts determined on a cost or level of efforts basis. We compare the budgeted level of effort to actual level of effort incurred each month. The estimated level of effort to complete an individual contract is adjusted accordingly. Also, at each month end the cumulative progress is measured and adjusted so that at each month end the cumulative progress on each contract matches the then current view of the percentage completed. If the actual level of effort incurred plus the estimated level of effort to complete exceeds the level of effort consistent with making a profit on a contract, then the loss on the contract would be recognized in the month that the loss becomes evident.

When our contracts contain extended payment terms, we defer recognition of revenue until amounts become due pursuant to payment schedules and no other uncertainties exist. We correspondingly defer a proportionate amount of contract cost which will be matched against the deferred revenue when recognized. Should management make the determination that previously deferred revenue will not be recognized, the corresponding amount of deferred contract cost will be charged to expense at that time. As of March 31, 2006, we have deferred $18 thousand contract costs in accordance with this policy.

Our revenue recognition policy takes into consideration the creditworthiness of the customer in determining the probability of collection as a criterion for revenue recognition. The determination of creditworthiness requires the exercise of judgment, which affects our revenue recognition. If a customer is deemed to be not creditworthy, all revenue under arrangements with that customer is recognized only upon receipt of cash. The creditworthiness of such customers is re-assessed on a regular basis and revenue is deferred until cash is received. In addition, when our contracts contain customer acceptance provisions, management assesses whether uncertainty exists about such acceptance in determining when to record revenue.

Cash and cash equivalents

ACE*COMM considers all investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash held in foreign bank accounts was $204 thousand and $852 thousand at March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

ACE*COMM evaluates the carrying value of long-lived assets and intangible assets whenever certain events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. When indicators of impairment exist, the estimated future net undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset are compared to the asset’s carrying amount to determine if impairment has occurred. If such assets are deemed impaired, an impairment loss equal to the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the assets is recognized. If quoted market prices for the assets are not available, the fair value is calculated using the present value of estimated net cash flows. ACE*COMM did not record an impairment during the three months and nine months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. If we were to adjust our estimate of future cash flows downward in the future, we may be required to record an impairment charge to reduce the carrying value of long-lived and intangible assets.

Inventories

Inventories consist principally of purchased materials to be used in the production of finished goods and are stated at the lower of cost, determined on the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method, or market. We periodically review our inventories against future estimated demand and usage and either write down or reserve against inventory carrying values.

Reclassifications

Certain prior year information has been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation.

Foreign Currency

The Company considers the functional currency of its foreign subsidiaries to be the local currency. Assets and liabilities recorded in foreign currencies are translated at the exchange rate on the balance sheet date and revenue, costs and expenses are translated at average rates of exchange in effect during the relevant period. Translation gains and losses are reported within accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).

Total comprehensive income (loss) consists of the following (in thousands):


	For the three months ended					For the nine months ended
	March 31,					March 31,
	2006		2005			2006			2005
	(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
Net income (loss)	$	365	$	(6,593	)	$	812		$	(6,803	)
Other comprehensive income (foreign currency translation)		9		(43	)		(114	)		56

Total other comprehensive income (loss)	$	374	$	(6,636	)	$	698		$	(6,747	)

Share Based Payments

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No.123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” Statement. SFAS 123(R) provides investors and other users of financial statements with more complete and neutral financial information by requiring that the compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in financial statements. That cost is measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued.

Statement 123(R) covers a wide range of share-based compensation arrangements including share options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans. Statement 123(R) replaces FASB Statement No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” Statement 123, as originally issued in 1995, established as preferable a fair-value-based method of accounting for share-based payment transactions with employees which was applied by the Company through June 30, 2005. That Statement permitted entities the option of continuing to apply the guidance in Opinion 25, as long as the footnotes to financial statements disclosed what net income would have been had the preferable fair-value-based method been used.

Effective July 1, 2005, the Company adopted Statement 123(R) using the modified-prospective-transition (MPT) method. Under this method, the Company’s prior periods do not reflect any restated amounts. The Company recognized $21 thousand and $78 thousand of compensation expense related to stock options during the three and nine months ended March 31, 2006, respectively, as a result of the adoption of Statement 123(R). If Statement 123(R) had not been adopted, basic and diluted net income per share would have remained at $0.02 per share and $0.05 per share for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2006, respectively. We expect to recognize expense related to stock options of $99 thousand in fiscal 2006, $71 thousand in fiscal 2007, $20 thousand in fiscal 2008 and $2 thousand in fiscal 2009 associated with unvested awards not yet recognized. During the nine months ended March 31, 2006, we granted restricted stock as disclosed in Note 5 which has been recorded at

an aggregate fair value, after forfeitures, of $389 thousand which will be amortized over 4 years as the shares vest and the restrictions lapse. During the nine months ended March 31, 2006, the Company granted 42,000 stock options under the 2000 Stock Option Plan for Directors with a fair value of $59 thousand and we recognized $23 thousand expense related to these options during the period. The assumptions included in the fair value calculations for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 are expected life of 3 years, interest rate of 4.46%, expected volatility of 83% and dividend yield of 0%.

During the past several years the Company has initiated numerous cost reduction measures which have affected our employees, including their compensation. To promote employee retention, in June 2005, we accelerated vesting of all out of the money stock options of 640,343 options at price ranges of $2.08 to $8.50. The Company reported in Note 2, Stock Based Compensation, pro forma compensation expense of $689,000 associated with the accelerated options. Had we not accelerated the vesting of these options, compensation expense of $402,000, $238,000 and $49,000 would have been recorded in the income statement upon the required adoption of SFAS 123(R) for fiscal years 2006, 2007 and 2008, respectively.

Through June 30, 2005, the Company generally applied Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, ''Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,’’ and related interpretations in accounting for stock options and presented pro forma net income and earnings per share data as if the accounting prescribed by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, ''Accounting for Stock Based Compensation,’’ had been applied. The Company also applies the provisions of FIN 44, “Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation,” as required when modifications and other provisions cause the application of variable accounting which calls for the periodic measurement of compensation expense based on the difference in the exercise price and the underlying value of the related stock and the guidance in Emerging Issues Task Force bulletin 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services.”

Transactions for which non-employees are issued equity instruments for goods or services received are recorded by the Company based upon the fair value of the goods or services received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more readily measured. During September 2005, we issued 325,625 shares of common stock for a non-exclusive perpetual software license to be utilized to enhance our flexible mediation product and rating capabilities. The license is valued at $1.3 million. This is based on stock issued of $791 thousand, $500 thousand paid in cash and $50,000 to be paid in one year. The stock value is based on the weighted average for the two days prior and two days subsequent to the measurement date of August 17, 2005 which is the date we formally received the source code. The cost of the license is being amortized over 36 months beginning in October 2005, which is the date sales efforts began.

For the purposes of the pro forma amounts shown, the fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model. Had compensation cost been recognized based on the fair values of options at the grant dates consistent with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, the Company’s net (loss) income and basic and diluted net (loss) income per common share would have been changed to pro forma amounts in the following table for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2005.

The Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) effective July 1, 2005 and accordingly has included compensation expense in results of operations; therefore, pro-forma information is only presented for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2005.

The assumptions included in the fair value calculations for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 are expected life of 3 years, interest rate of 3.5%, expected volatility of 110% and dividend yield of 0%. Amounts are in thousands except per share amounts.


	For the three			For the nine
	months ended			months ended
	March 31,			March 31,
	2005			2005
	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
Net income (loss)	$	(6,593	)	$	(6,803	)
Add: Total stock-based compensation expense reported in net loss		—			—
Deduct: Total stock-based compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards*		(238	)		(710	)

Pro forma net loss	$	(6,831	)	$	(7,513	)


Earnings per share basic and diluted:
As reported	$	(0.47	)	$	(0.49	)
Pro forma	$	(0.49	)	$	(0.54	)

Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic		13,981			13,844
Diluted		13,981			13,844


*	All awards refers to awards granted, modified or settled in fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 1994 — awards for which the fair value was required to be measured under Statement 123.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements -

In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151 “Inventory Costs,” an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4. The amendments made by Statement 151 clarify that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted materials (spoilage) should be recognized as current-period charges and require the allocation of fixed production overheads to inventory based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. The guidance is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. Earlier application is permitted for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after November 23, 2004. The Company is currently evaluating the financial statement impact of the adoption of SFAS 151. The Company adopted SFAS No. 151 effective July 1, 2005 and this did not impact the financial results for the nine months ended March 31, 2006.

NOTE 3 — ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

Accounts receivable consist of the following (in thousands):


	March 31,			June 30,
	2006			2005
Billed receivables	$	5,509		$	4,246
Unbilled and other receivables		2,091			713
Allowance for doubtful accounts		(194	)		(89	)

	$	7,406		$	4,870

Billed

At March 31, 2006, five customers, including four international customers, comprised $3.3 million or 59% of the total billed receivables and 55% of this balance is current. Four of these five customers have balances greater than ninety days which total

$1.5 million and comprise 88% of the greater than ninety days balance of $1.7 million. As of May 3, 2006, the Company had collected $298 thousand of this amount. Management believes the remaining uncollected amounts will be collected. International customers have traditionally taken longer to pay than domestic customers.

Unbilled

Unbilled receivables include costs and estimated profit on contracts in progress that have been recognized as revenue but not yet billed to customers under the provisions of specific contracts. Substantially all unbilled receivables are expected to be billed and collected within one year.

Allowance for doubtful accounts

The Company recorded a provision for doubtful accounts of $117 thousand, wrote off $14 thousand in uncollected accounts, and credited the allowance for recoveries $2 thousand during the nine months ended March 31, 2006. We recorded a provision for doubtful accounts of $157 thousand, wrote off $604 thousand and credited the allowance for recoveries $21 thousand during the nine months ended March 31, 2005.

Management continuously assesses the collectibility of accounts receivable and establishes reserves when necessary based on factors considered which include customer creditworthiness and past payment history.

NOTE 4 — INVENTORY

Inventory consists of the following (in thousands):


	March 31,			June 30,
	2006			2005
Inventory	$	1,280		$	857
Allowance for obsolescence		(321	)		(325	)

	$	959		$	532

Inventory write-offs during the nine months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 were $0. In September 2005, we purchased a non-exclusive perpetual software license valued at $1.3 million. The cost of the license is being amortized over 36 months beginning in October 2005. The current portion of the license of $447 thousand is included in inventory and the balance of the license is included in other assets.

NOTE 5 — STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

During the nine months ended March 31, 2006, the Company issued 23,723 shares of common stock under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. During the nine months ended March 31, 2006, the Company granted 42,000 stock options under the 2000 Stock Option Plan for Directors with a fair value of $59 thousand and we recognized $23 thousand expense related to these options during the period. The assumptions included in the fair value calculations for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 are expected life of 3 years, interest rate of 4.46%, expected volatility of 83% and dividend yield of 0%.

During the nine months ended March 31, 2006, the Company issued 137,667 shares as restricted stock grants of which 10,500 shares were cancelled due to employee terminations. These grants vest over four years. The Company recognized $42 thousand expense during the period related to these stock grants.

Other accumulated comprehensive loss comprises foreign currency translation charges associated with operations in the United Kingdom, Australia and Canada.

During September 2005, we issued 325,625 shares of common stock for a non-exclusive perpetual software license to be utilized to enhance our flexible mediation product and rating capabilities. The license is valued at $1.3 million. This is based on stock issued of $791 thousand, $500 thousand paid in cash, and $50,000 to be paid in one year. The stock value is based on the weighted average for the two days prior and two days subsequent to the measurement date of August 17, 2005, which is the date we formally received the source code. The cost of the license is being amortized over 36 months beginning in October 2005, which is the date sales efforts began.

On March 31, 2005, we completed a private placement of 1,000,000 units at $2.50 per unit, resulting in aggregate gross proceeds to ACE*COMM of $2,500,000. Each unit sold in the private placement consisted of one share of ACE*COMM’s common stock and a warrant to acquire 0.50 shares of ACE*COMM common stock at an exercise price of $3.53 per share. Together with each unit we granted an additional investment right for a six month period commencing with effectiveness of the registration statement to acquire one share of ACE*COMM common stock at an exercise price of $2.50 per share and a three-year warrant to acquire 0.50 shares of ACE*COMM common stock at an exercise price of $3.53 per share. The closing price of ACE*COMM’s common stock on March 31, 2005 was $3.18.

We renegotiated the additional investment right with the investors in October 2005. Instead of a six-month additional investment right to acquire 1,000,000 shares of ACE*COMM common stock at an exercise price of $2.50 per share, each share of which would come with a five-year warrant to acquire 0.50 shares of ACE*COMM common stock at an exercise price of $3.53 per share, the investors now hold warrants to purchase 1.9 million shares at an exercise price of $2.50 per share for a six month period commencing with effectiveness of the registration statement. The registration statement covering the stock issued to the investors and the shares underlying the warrants was declared effective on March 3, 2006. In addition, certain provisions related to the possible payment of liquidated damages were modified to cap the amount of such damages which could be paid. Management has considered the provisions of EITF 00-19 and determined the warrants to be properly classified as equity instruments.

NOTE 6 — MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS

Fiscal 2005

Double Helix Solutions Limited

The total purchase price for the acquisition was £4.4 million, or approximately $8.3 million, plus additional consideration under an earn-out equal to the excess of 2helix revenues during the next 12 months over £3.5 million. The purchase price consisted of 1,740,294 shares of ACE*COMM common stock valued at a per share price of $3.1648, the 10 day volume weighted average price of ACE*COMM common stock, and notes with a six month maturity in the aggregate principal amount of approximately $2.8 million. On April 8, 2005, $2.1 million of the notes were paid.

On October 28, 2005 the Company and the former owners of 2helix entered into a Deed of Variation and settlement amendment relating to the sale and purchase of the entire issued share capital of Double Helix Solutions Limited. Under the terms of the agreement, 500,000 shares of ACE*COMM stock issued in the original transaction were returned to the Company, the remaining notes and accrued interest of $745 thousand were reduced to $373 thousand and the maturity dates were extended to September 30, 2006. This was in exchange for a new earn-out of 618,084 ACE*COMM shares with a graduated payment schedule based upon the revenues generated from the sales of Network Business Intelligence products and services over the next two fiscal years ending on June 30, 2007.

The original purchase price of approximately $8.3 million plus costs incurred of $800 thousand for a total purchase price of $9.1 million has been reduced by approximately $1.9 million. The decrease includes 500,000 shares returned valued at $1.5 million based on the average stock price two days before and after the transaction, the reduction in notes payable of $357 thousand offset by costs incurred of approximately $160 thousand plus accumulated amortization expense of $220 thousand for a revised purchase price of $7.2 million.

The new earn-out will be based upon a revenue target of Network Business Intelligence and will be paid on a graduated scale starting at 75% achievement of the revenue target and for achievement above 100% an additional 30,904 shares are earned for each 5% increase in revenues. At 100% of the revenue target, the 618,084 shares that will be held in escrow will be earned and released. The earn-out has not been recorded because the achievement of the revenue target, which is for the two fiscal years endings on June 30, 2007, is not probable at this time. Should the earn-out become probable , the additional consideration then payable will be recorded as an adjustment to the purchase price in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The effects of the amendment are reflected in our financial statements for the second quarter of fiscal 2006.

As part of the acquisition of 2helix, ACE*COMM acquired three software tools (Network Inspector, Network Visualization and Discrepancy Inspector) that were in the process of being developed into new products.

Network Inspector is a data collection, enhancement and reporting tool. Network Visualization is used for network planning and allows operators an accurate representation of the physical network in relation to existing customers, prospective customers, network infrastructure and the available spare capacity. Discrepancy Inspector is an analysis and reporting tool that allows users to identify and investigate discrepancies in data between the network, OSS and upstream business systems. The fair value of each project at the date of acquisition was $2,274,601 for Network Inspector, $1,705,951 for Network Visualization and $1,137,300 for Discrepancy Inspector.

On the date of the purchase the projects were approximately 50% completed and as of March 31, 2006 development was essentially complete for our initial projects. The Company has expanded its development efforts and is developing a series of products centered around the 2helix products and will include other ACE*COMM and third party products under the title of Network Business Intelligence. This new effort is in development and incurred costs are included in research and development.

Delays with these projects and with additional development efforts could adversely impact future revenues and could make the Company’s products less competitive in the marketplace. Our ability to realize the full value of the acquisition of 2helix is dependent upon the completion of these projects. To complete the projects we must be able to maintain our existing development team and recruit additional resources to complete projects on time. Any failure to do this will limit the market into which we can sell our products and services. Further, customers are always looking for the most advanced technology available. To the extent that competitors can offer more advanced technology within a given price range our sales would be adversely affected.

To value the in process research and development (IPR&D), we applied the Fair Value standard and calculated the value by discounting the estimated cash flow streams that would be generated. This analysis involved several key assumptions to calculate the estimated fair value of IPR&D. The key assumptions were:

Timing of Cash Flows and Profits — The timing of cash flows and profit margins are based on management’s detailed forecast of its IPR&D projects for fiscal year (June 30 year end) 2006 through 2011. We forecasted cost of sales of 55% and general and administrative costs of 20% consistent with 2helix’s other operations. Additionally, an income tax rate of 35% was applied.

Contributory Charges — Contributory charges for working capital, fixed assets and assembled workforce were taken into account. Historical balances were used to estimate the contributory balances, when available.

Discount Rate — The discount rate is specific to the intangible assets that are being valued, and are effectively based on the risk profile of the acquired company. A weighted average cost of capital was used for discounted cash flow calculations that were based on free cash flow to invested capital economic earnings streams. We considered the cost of debt, the risk-free rate, the equity risk premium and the size risk premium in establishing the weighted average cost of capital. A discount rate of 21% was used in the IPR&D calculation.

NOTE 7 — INCOME TAXES

The Company is in a net operating loss carry forward position. In the event we experience a change in control as defined by the Internal Revenue Service, use of some or all of our net operating loss carry forwards may be limited. A valuation allowance offsets all net deferred tax assets.

NOTE 8 — SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company is managed as one segment and results are measured based on revenue type and not business unit. However, we do not measure operating profit by revenue source. The following table reflects revenues by type and geographic location:


	For the three months ended				For the nine months ended
	March 31,				March 31,
	2006		2005		2006		2005
	(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)
Revenue by Type
Enterprise	$	3,110	$	1,540	$	7,390	$	4,226
Network Service Provider (NSP)		1,611		974		7,518		5,149
Operations Support Systems (OSS)		1,982		1,243		5,219		3,806
IT and Other		—		3		—		16

Total Revenue	$	6,703	$	3,760	$	20,127	$	13,197


Revenue by Location
Asia	$	876	$	607	$	2,260	$	2,209
North America		3,490		1,150		9,313		4,522
Europe		1,406		1,939		5,357		5,177
Middle East		379		60		2,645		1,252
Africa		360		—		360		—
South America		192		4		192		37

Total Revenue	$	6,703	$	3,760	$	20,127	$	13,197

We purchased 2helix in March 2005. Accordingly, the results of 2helix revenues are included in our results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2006 in OSS revenue. Previous periods do not include the revenue of 2helix. As part of the integration of 2helix we have begun implementing cost reduction and efficiency actions consistent with our prior efforts to maintain costs.

During the nine months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, one customer comprised 20% and 2% of revenue, respectively. Total revenues earned outside of the US represents 58% of total revenue earned for the nine months ended March 31, 2006.

NOTE 9 — EARNINGS PER SHARE (in thousands, except per share amounts)

The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of basic net income (loss) per common share (“Basic EPS”) and diluted net income (loss) per common share (“Diluted EPS”):


	For the three months ended					For the nine months ended
	March 31,					March 31,
	2006		2005			2006		2005
	(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)
Basic EPS:
Net income (loss) — numerator
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders	$	365	$	(6,593	)	$	812	$	(6,803	)
Shares — denominator
Weighted average common shares		16,889		13,981			16,838		13,844

Basic EPS	$	0.02	$	(0.47	)	$	0.05	$	(0.49	)


Diluted EPS:
Net income (loss) — numerator
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders	$	365	$	(6,593	)	$	812	$	(6,803	)
Shares — denominator
Weighted average common shares		16,889		13,981			16,838		13,844
Stock options *		535		—			420		—
Restricted stock		127		—			72		—
Warrants		128		—			21		—
Total weighted shares and equivalents		17,679		13,981			17,351		13,844

Diluted EPS	$	0.02	$	(0.47	)	$	0.05	$	(0.49	)


*		Due to the loss incurred during the nine months ended March 31, 2005, zero incremental shares related to stock options are included in the calculation of Diluted EPS because the effect would be anti-dilutive. The total number of potentially dilutive shares not included in the EPS calculation at March 31, 2005 due to anti-dilution was 290,367.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION

This Report contains certain statements of a forward-looking nature relating to future events or the future financial performance of the Company, some or all of which may involve risk and uncertainty. ACE*COMM often introduces a forward-looking statement by such words as “anticipate,” “plan,” “projects,” “continuing,” “ongoing,” “expects,” “management (or the Company) believes,” or “intend.” Investors should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which involve estimates, assumptions, risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to vary materially from those expressed in this Report or from those indicated by one or more forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they were made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update any of the forward-looking statements. In evaluating forward-looking statements, the risks and uncertainties investors should specifically consider include, but are not limited to, demand levels in the relevant markets for the Company’s products, the ability of the Company’s customers to make timely payment for purchases of its products and services, the risk of additional losses on accounts receivable, success in marketing the Company’s products and services internationally, the effectiveness of cost containment strategies, as well as the various factors contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005, and in subsequent reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the matters set forth in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Additional Factors Affecting Future Operating Results,” as well as other matters presented in this Report.

Overview

Sources of Revenue

ACE*COMM delivers enterprise telemanagement applications and advanced Convergent Mediation™ and Operations Support Systems solutions to wireline and wireless voice, data, and Internet communications providers. Our solutions typically consist of hardware, software and related services that enable the capture, security, validation, correlation, augmentation, and warehousing of data from network elements and the distribution of this data in appropriate formats to OSS (“Operations Support Systems”) and BSS (“Business Support Systems”) operations. Our solutions also provide for centralized management and security of enterprise networks.

ACE*COMM derives revenues primarily from the sale of our products, including hardware and software, and related services. ACE*COMM enters into formal arrangements that provide for single or multiple deliverables of hardware, software and services. These arrangements are formalized by either a simple purchase order or by more complex contracts such as development, reseller or master agreements. These arrangements are generally U.S. dollar denominated, but as we have increased the percentage of international sales these arrangements are also denominated in local currencies such as the British Pound, and typically have an aggregate value of several thousand to several million dollars and vary in length from 30 days to several years, as in the case of master agreements. Agreements spanning several years are normally implemented in smaller statements of work or orders that are typically deliverable within three to twelve months. Our customers, including resellers, do not possess the right of return or exchange.

Revenue for a given period typically reflects products delivered or services performed during the period with respect to relatively large financial commitments from a small number of customers. During the three months ended March 31, 2006, we had 12 customers generating $150,000 or more in revenue during the period (“Major Customers”) representing approximately 71% of total revenue. One customer, Northrup Grumman (28% of revenue), had revenue greater than 10% of reported revenue. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, we had six Major Customers representing approximately 54% of total revenue. Our largest three customers during the three months ended March 31, 2005 were an international systems integrator whose purchases represented approximately 23% of revenue and two wireless service providers in the UK whose purchases represented approximately 16% of total revenue. The average revenue earned per Major Customer was $395 thousand and $337 thousand, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005.

The revenues from Northrup Grumman relate to a major contract with the U.S. Air Force, discussed below under the caption “Recent Developments.” That contract, which constitutes a large portion of our backlog, is still in its early stages, with most deliveries still to come.

Trends and Strategy

Revenue growth depends, in part, on the overall demand for our product-based solutions and on sales to large customers. Because our sales are primarily to telecommunication and Internet service providers and large enterprises, our ability to generate revenue also depends on specific conditions affecting those providers and on general economic conditions.

We have been pursuing a growth strategy designed to expand our product line and areas of distribution to counteract reductions in demand for our traditional products and services. We are continuing to target sales efforts toward what we believe to be a growing market for our Convergent Mediation™ solutions outside of North America. A substantial percentage of our sales over the past several quarters have been to overseas customers.

We also have been expanding our customer base and offerings through acquisitions. The acquisition of i3 Mobile and Intasys during fiscal year 2004 and the acquisition of 2helix in March 2005 are consistent with this strategy. We intend to continue to pursue the acquisition of additional complementary technologies to broaden our product line and increase our geographic scope.

We are focusing more on newer technologies, both through these acquisitions and internal development that target new market areas both in North America and abroad. After completing the acquisition of 2helix during the quarter ending March 31, 2005, ACE*COMM now offers the 2helix revenue assurance products included in Operations Support Systems (OSS) revenue under the Network Business Intelligence product suite. We have integrated the 2helix technologies into our Convergent Mediation™ service delivery platform. This past year we have introduced some new internally developed products and services, including Convergent Mediation™ SDP, a new software delivery platform which includes service implementation

and control capabilities for VoIP, 3G and IP data services. Finally, we recently introduced Parent Patrol™, a newly released product that allows parents to control their children’s usage of mobile phones and data services.

Over the last year, we have focused our sales resources on opportunities for our newest generation of NetPlus EOSS products. In addition to pursuing our traditional government markets, sales activities have been increased to large commercial enterprises to expand our NetPlus customer base. We believe our recent contract award from the U.S. Air Force (with Northrup Grumman as prime contractor), which led to a significant increase in our contract backlog, resulted in part from these efforts.

Even as our newer technologies have been gaining market acceptance, we have experienced some reductions in demand from existing customers due to the continuing changes in the telecommunications industry. We experienced a decline in the number of potential customers for our OSS products and services and a reduction in our existing customer base in the UK as a result of consolidation within the UK service provider market by network providers. Our largest customer in this group has given notice that they will be terminating their service contract with us in the current quarter. This customer accounted for 9% of our consolidated revenues in fiscal 2005 and 5% for the first nine months of fiscal 2006.

As a result of previous losses, we are continuing to manage our costs and have maintained numerous cost reduction measures which have kept operating expenses low. We have carried over these cost reduction measures to our acquisitions as part of the integration of the acquired companies.

Over the past year, we have increased our contract backlog, which was $18.6 million at March 31, 2006. We experienced increased costs and liquidity demands during the current fiscal year as we have devoted significant effort to delivering products and services and supporting our customers under these contracts, and the amounts of borrowings under our lines of credit increased as a result to $2.5 million as of September 30, 2005 and $2.5 million as of December 31, 2005. These increased liquidity demands have started to subside as we have collected initial amounts generated under these contracts. The amount of borrowings under our lines of credit equaled $1.8 million at March 31, 2006, and we had no outstanding borrowings at April 20, 2006.

Recent Developments

2helix

On March 24, 2005, we completed the acquisition of Double Helix Solutions Limited, a company based in London that operates under the name 2helix, a provider of network asset assurance, revenue optimization, and business intelligence solutions to Tier 1 carriers, primarily in the European sector. The total purchase price for the acquisition was £4.4 million, or approximately $8.3 million, plus possible additional consideration under an earn-out equal to the excess of 2helix revenues over £3.5 million during the 12 months commencing in March 2005. The purchase price consisted of 1,740,294 shares of ACE*COMM common stock valued at a per share price of $3.1648, the 10 day volume weighted average price of ACE*COMM common stock, and notes payable with a six month maturity in the aggregate principal amount of approximately $2.8 million.

On October 28, 2005, the Company and the former owners of 2helix entered into a Deed of Variation and settlement agreement under which 500,000 shares of ACE*COMM stock issued in the original transaction has been returned to the Company and one half of the £400,000 note was cancelled in exchange for a new earn-out of 618,084 ACE*COMM shares. The new earn-out has a graduated payment schedule based upon the revenues generated from the sales of Network Business Intelligence products and services over the two fiscal years ending on June 30, 2007, as discussed more fully in Note 7 of the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

The new earn-out is based upon a revenue target of Network Business Intelligence and will be paid on a graduated scale starting at 75% achievement of the revenue target and for achievement above 100% an additional 30,904 shares are earned for each 5% increase in revenues. At 100% of the revenue target, the 618,084 shares that will be held in escrow will be earned and released.

In accordance with FAS 141, we allocated the purchase price and subsequent re-negotiation based on an economic valuation of the purchased assets. Based upon this valuation, we have recorded an intangible asset of $0.8 million which is being amortized over thirty-six months related to the purchased customers and technology of 2helix. Additionally, we recorded a charge of

$5.1 million in the third quarter of 2005 associated with the purchase of in process research and development. 2helix has several software tools that are being developed into software products that we intend to complete and sell either as stand alone or integrated into our convergent mediation service delivery platform, as discussed more fully in Note 7 of the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Private Placement

We renegotiated the additional investment right with the investors in October 2005. Instead of a six-month additional investment right to acquire 1,000,000 shares of ACE*COMM common stock at an exercise price of $2.50 per share, each share of which would come with a five-year warrant to acquire 0.50 shares of ACE*COMM common stock at an exercise price of $3.53 per share, the investors now hold warrants to purchase 1.9 million shares at an exercise price of $2.50 per share for a six month period commencing with effectiveness of the registration statement. In addition, certain provisions related to the possible payment of liquidated damages were modified to cap the amount of such damages which could be paid. The registration statement covering the stock issued to the investors and the shares underlying the warrants was declared effective on March 3, 2006.

Department of Defense Contract

In April 2005, we were selected to provide our NetPlus telecommunications system to the Air Force for a global deployment with Northrup Grumman as the prime contractor. These programs will encompass hundreds of installations, and are expected to total in excess of $20 million in revenues for us over their lifespan. They include initial deployments scheduled over an 18 month timeframe, follow-on contracts for life cycle support and maintenance, further opportunities for ongoing upgrades and improvements, and additional sales opportunities for future versions of NetPlus EOSS and possibly new products recently acquired as a part of 2helix. We have commenced work under this contract, but because of certain re-designs and changes in the delivery schedule it remains in the early stages. Most deliveries are still to come, likely next fiscal year, and most of the delivery orders are still in our backlog at March 31, 2006. We also have significant unbilled accounts receivable associated with this contract.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our significant accounting policies are more fully described in the notes to the financial statements included in our most recent Form 10-K filing. However, certain of our accounting policies are particularly important to the portrayal of our financial position and results of operations or require the application of significant estimates, judgment or assumptions by our management. We believe that the estimates, judgments and assumptions upon which we rely are reasonably based upon information available to us at the time that the estimates, judgments and assumptions are made. These estimates, judgments and assumptions can affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the periods presented. To the extent there are material differences between these estimates, judgments or assumptions and actual results, our financial statements will be affected.
The following is a brief discussion of these critical accounting policies:

Revenue Recognition

ACE*COMM derives revenues primarily from products, where a combination of hardware, proprietary licensed software, and services are offered to customers. These products are typically formalized in a multiple element arrangement involving application of existing software capabilities or modification of the underlying software, implementation and support services. Our software licenses to end-users generally provide for an initial license fee to use the product in perpetuity. Subscription revenue, included in Operational Support Systems revenue, is recognized on a monthly basis based upon the number of telephone subscribers of our customers.

We recognize revenue in accordance with current generally accepted accounting principles. ACE*COMM follows specific and detailed guidelines in measuring revenue; however, certain judgments and current interpretations of rules and guidelines affect the application of our revenue recognition policy. Revenue from license fees is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery of the product has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable and collectibility is considered “probable” under applicable accounting tests. One of the critical judgments we make is our assessment of the probability of collecting the related accounts receivable balance on a customer-by-customer basis. As a result, the timing or amount of revenue recognition may have been different if different assessments of the probability of collection had been made at the time the transactions were recorded in revenue. In cases where collectibility is not deemed probable, revenue is recognized upon receipt of cash, assuming all other criteria have been met. We are also required to exercise judgment in determining whether the fixed and determinable fee criteria have been met by evaluating the risk of our granting a concession to our customers, particularly when payments terms are beyond our normal credit period of sixty to ninety days. In addition, when our contracts contain customer acceptance provisions, management assesses whether uncertainty exists about such acceptance in determining when to record revenue.

For multiple element arrangements that include software products, we allocate and defer revenue for the undelivered elements based on their vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value, which is generally the price charged when that element is sold separately. We are required to exercise judgment in determining whether sufficient evidence exists for each undelivered element and to determine whether and when each element has been delivered. If we were to change any of these assumptions or judgments, it could cause a material increase or decrease in the amount of revenue that we report in a particular period.

In situations when our products involve significant modification or customization of software, or when our systems integration and services are essential to the functionality of the software, revenues relating to the software licenses and services are aggregated and the combined revenues are recognized on a percentage-of-completion basis. The hardware revenue on these contracts is recognized upon transfer of title, which generally occurs at the same time the licensed software is delivered. Revenue recognized using the percentage-of-completion method is based on the estimated stage of completion of individual contracts determined on a cost or level of efforts basis. Approximately 8% and 10% of our revenue for the three months and nine months ended March 31, 2006, respectively, was derived from contracts accounted for under the percentage of completion method.

Allowance for Bad Debts

The allowance for doubtful accounts is established through a charge to general and administrative expenses. This allowance is for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. It is an estimate and is regularly evaluated by us for adequacy by taking into consideration factors such as past experience, credit quality of the customer, age of the receivable balance, individually and in aggregate, and current economic conditions that may affect a customer’s ability to pay. The use of different estimates or assumptions could produce different allowance balances. Our customer base is highly concentrated in the telecommunications and Internet service provider industries. Several of the leading companies in these industries have filed for bankruptcy. In addition, we have experienced delays in receiving payment from certain of our international customers and certain of these customers have negotiated longer payment terms. If collection is not probable at the time the transaction is consummated, we do not recognize revenue until cash collection. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

We evaluate the carrying value of long-lived assets and intangible assets whenever certain events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. When indicators of impairment exist, the estimated future net undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset are compared to the asset’s carrying amount to determine if impairment has occurred. If such assets are deemed impaired, an impairment loss equal to the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the assets is recognized. If quoted market prices for the assets are not available, the fair value is

calculated using the present value of estimated net cash flows. We did not record an impairment charge during the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005.

Results of Operations

The following table shows the percentage of revenue of certain items from ACE*COMM’s statements of operations:


	For the three months ended						For the nine months ended
	March 31,						March 31,
	2006			2005			2006			2005
Revenue		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%

Costs and expenses:
Cost of revenue		34.2	%		53.0	%		35.2	%		46.3	%
Selling, general and administrative expenses		46.0	%		67.8	%		45.9	%		54.3	%
Research and development		13.0	%		16.8	%		14.0	%		13.2	%
In process research and development		0.0	%		136.1	%		0.0	%		38.8	%


Income (loss) from operations		6.8	%		(173.7	)%		4.9	%		(52.6	)%
Interest expense		1.4	%		0.4	%		0.9	%		0.2	%
Other income		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.0	%		1.7	%

Income (loss) before income taxes		5.4	%		(174.1	)%		4.0	%		(51.1	)%
Income tax expense		0.0	%		1.2	%		0.0	%		0.4	%

Net income (loss)		5.4	%		(175.3	)%		4.0	%		(51.5	)%

The above reflects the results of operations from the purchase of 2helix in March 2005. Previous periods do not include the revenue and expenses of 2helix.

Revenues

The following summarizes revenue for the three and nine months ended March 31, (in thousands):


	For the three months ended				For the nine months ended
	March 31,				March 31,
	2006		2005		2006		2005
	(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)
Revenue
Licenses and hardware	$	3,509	$	1,066	$	10,161	$	5,212
Services		3,194		2,694		9,966		7,985

Total revenue	$	6,703	$	3,760	$	20,127	$	13,197

Total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2006 were $6.7 million compared to $3.8 million in 2005 reflecting an increase of $2.9 million or 76%. Total revenues for the nine months ended March 31, 2006 were $20.1 million compared to $13.2 million in 2005 reflecting an increase of $6.9 million or 52%. License and hardware revenue increased by $2.4 million to $3.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 compared to 2005 and by $5.0 million to $10.2 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2006 compared to 2005. The increase is primarily due to revenues of $1.5 million and $3.0 for a software license related to the Air Force contract for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2006, respectively.

Services revenue increased by $0.5 million from $2.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 to $3.2 million in 2006 and by $2.0 million from $8.0 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2005 to $10.0 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2006. The majority of this increase was principally the result of initial revenues under the Air Force contract of $0.4 million and $1.1 million for the three and nine months, respectively, and the inclusion of the revenues from 2helix for $0.2 million and $0.9 million for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2006, respectively.

Revenue from sales to network service providers increased 60% from $1.0 million to $1.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 44% from $5.2 million to $7.5 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2006. This increase was primarily the result of revenues from new major customers. Revenue from sales to enterprises increased 107% from $1.5 million to $3.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and increased 76% from $4.2 million to $7.4 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2006. The increase in Enterprise revenue is primarily due to the license and services revenue of $1.9 and $4.1 million related to the Air Force contract for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2006, respectively.

Revenue from sales of Operations Support Systems increased 67% from $1.2 million to $2.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 compared to 2005 and increased 37% from $3.8 million to $5.2 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2006. The increase in Operations Support Systems revenue is primarily due to a large software license with one-time revenue of $0.4 million. The Operations Support Systems products were acquired with the purchase of the assets from Intasys in February 2004 and 2helix in March 2005, and represented 30% of total revenue for the quarter. 2helix revenues were $0.2 million and $0.9 million for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2006, respectively.

Backlog was $18.6 million as of March 31, 2006 compared to $11.6 million at March 31, 2005 and $23.1 million at June 30, 2005. We define backlog as future revenue from signed contracts or purchase orders for delivery of hardware and software products and services to be provided to customers generally within one year. We have experienced fluctuations in our backlog at various times. We anticipate that $3.3 million of the backlog will be recognized during the remainder of fiscal year 2006. Although a large portion of our backlog relates to a major contract with the U.S. Air Force, discussed above under the caption “Recent Developments,” that contract is still in its early stages, with most deliveries still to come later this fiscal year and next. Although we believe that our entire backlog consists of firm orders, our backlog as of any particular date may not be indicative of actual revenue for any future period because of the possibility of customer changes in delivery schedules and delays inherent in the contracting process.

Cost of Revenues

Our cost of revenue consists primarily of direct labor costs, direct material costs, and allocable indirect costs. The expenses for services provided by certain alliance partners in connection with the installation and integration of our products may also be included.

Cost of revenues has fixed and variable components and includes expenses that are directly related to the generation of operating revenues. Several cost categories are specifically identifiable as relating to products versus services including material costs and direct labor charged to a product job. In many instances, certain expenses related to infrastructure and personnel are often utilized to generate revenues from the various product and service categories, making it difficult to determine cost of revenue by product. We developed a methodology for segregating the product and service components of cost of revenues. Costs directly related to hardware or software that are identifiable by cost type, such as materials, freight, direct labor and travel charges were assigned to cost of licenses and hardware. Other charges including warranty, maintenance and re-work costs were allocated based upon warranty incident reports. Employee benefits are allocated based on total burden rate and other overhead costs are allocated on a pro-rata basis.

Our method of allocating these costs may or may not be comparable to approaches of other companies. Use of a different method of allocation could change the costs of revenues and margin associated with products and services. Our overall cost of revenue and gross margin is not affected by this allocation method.

Cost of revenues was $2.3 million and $2.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, representing 34% and 53% of revenues, respectively. Cost of revenues was $7.1 million and $6.1 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, representing 35% and 46% of revenues, respectively. Cost of revenues increased due to the increase in revenues but decreased as a percentage of revenue because revenues increased significantly and our cost base remained relatively fixed.

Cost of licenses and hardware revenue was $323 thousand and $742 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, representing 9% and 70% of licenses and hardware revenue, respectively. Cost of licenses and hardware revenue was $1.8 million and $2.2 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, representing 18% and 42% of licenses and hardware revenue, respectively. The percentages of revenues decreased due to lower materials costs associated with hardware revenue and fixed costs being spread over lower revenues. In addition, in each of the quarters ended December 31, 2005 and March 31, 2006, we recognized $1.5 million of revenue related to licenses delivered in June 2005, which was deferred due to extended payment terms. As such, there was no cost of sales associated with the revenue

recognized.

Cost of services revenue was $2.0 million and $1.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, representing 62% and 47% of services revenue for those periods, respectively. Cost of services revenue was $5.3 million and $3.9 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, representing 53% and 49% of services revenue for those periods, respectively. Cost of services revenue increased due to the increase in revenues, but remained relatively constant as a percentage of revenues.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses consist of costs to support our sales and administrative functions. Sales expenses consist primarily of salary, commission, travel, trade show, bid and proposal, and other related selling and marketing expenses required to sell our products to target markets. General and administrative expenses consist of provision for doubtful accounts and unallocated costs related to our information systems infrastructure, facilities, finance and accounting, legal, human resources and corporate management.

SG&A expenses were $3.1 million and $2.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, representing 46% and 68% of total revenues in each period, respectively. SG&A expenses were $13.1 million and $7.1 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, representing 46% and 54% of total revenues in each period, respectively. The increase in 2006 includes 2helix SG&A expenses of $0.5 million and $1.5 million for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2006, respectively. We have also increased our marketing and sales efforts related to our new products, such as Parent Patrol, resulting in an increase in SG&A.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development (R&D) expenses consist of personnel costs and the associated infrastructure costs required to support the design and development of our products such as JBill Global and NetPlus and our convergent mediation service delivery platform.

Research and development expenses were $872 thousand and $631 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and represented 13% and 17% of revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Research and development expenses were $2.8 million and $1.8 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and represented 14% and 13% of revenues for the nine months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Research and development during the three and nine months ended March 31, 2006 includes $274 thousand and $1.0 million, respectively, related to 2helix. 2helix has several software tools that are being developed into software products that we intend to complete and sell either as stand alone or integrated into our convergent mediation service delivery platform, as discussed more fully in Note 7 of the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements. We recently introduced our Network Business Intelligence™ suite consisting of ACE*COMM and 2helix products.

We have expanded the scope of our development efforts to include new applications such as Parent Patrol™ which provides a wireless network control solution. Additionally, we have branded a combination of 2helix, ACE*COMM and third party solutions under the Network Business Intelligence product suite. Network Business Intelligence products enable telecom carriers and service providers to benchmark and improve their data management processes and systems to increase the value of each individual customer, reduce churn, increase their return on investment on marketing and sales, improve internal accountability, and support their billing, revenue assurance, network management, and CRM operations. These expenses are expected to continue at or above the current levels for the remainder of fiscal year 2006 as we continue to develop the 2helix products and expand development of existing ACE*COMM products. During the quarter we received a contract from a Latin American Mobile Operator for our Network Business Intelligence™ product.

Although research and development expenses have increased and are expected to continue at or above the current level, we are pursuing several strategies to control costs in this area. We have been selective in approving new projects and in some instances discontinued projects that were not related to core future solutions. We are also evaluating alternative development opportunities such as outsourcing to continue to manage our expenses. In instances where we charge our customers for custom development we include the costs associated with the development in the cost of revenues. Finally, we have been pursuing opportunities to license or acquire market-ready new technology from third parties as part of our strategy for expanding our product offerings. During September 2005, we acquired a non-exclusive perpetual software license to be utilized to enhance our flexible mediation product and rating capabilities. The purchase was largely for common stock but also involved payment of $500 thousand in cash with $50 thousand more to be paid in one year, as discussed more fully in Note 6 of the Notes to our

Consolidated Financial Statements.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Asset and Cash Flow Analysis

We had cash and cash equivalents of $1.0 million and $2.7 million at March 31, 2006 and June 30, 2005, respectively. Cash and cash equivalents decreased by $1.7 million from June 30, 2005 to March 31, 2006, and comprised 7% and 20% of total assets as of March 31, 2006 and June 30, 2005, respectively. The net decrease is due to the increased activity resulting from our new contracts and costs associated with the acquisition and integration of 2helix, and an increase in our accounts receivable towards the end of the last quarter. Accounts receivable increased $2.5 million from June 30, 2005 to March 31, 2006 to $7.4 million while accounts payables decreased by $0.4 million. Our accounts receivable increased as a result of deliveries under existing contracts, and as our accounts receivable have grown our cash on hand has decreased. Our working capital has increased to $2.8 million at March 31, 2006 from $0.7 million at June 30, 2005 and our liquidity situation has started to improve as we have collected initial amounts generated under these contracts, enabling us to reduce the amounts outstanding under our lines of credit. The amount of borrowings under our lines of credit equaled $1.8 million at March 31, 2006, down from $2.5 million at December 31, 2005, and we had no outstanding borrowings at April 20, 2006.

Our cash flow is dependent upon numerous factors, including the timing of customer orders and engagements, and related obligations and payments, market acceptance of our products, the resources we devote to developing, marketing, selling and supporting our products, the timing and extent of changes in the size of our operations and other factors.

Five customers represent 61% of our gross trade receivables balances of March 31, 2006 and four of these customers are international. At March 31, 2006, approximately 32% of the Company’s billed accounts receivable was older than ninety days compared to 32% at June 30, 2005. Five customers comprised 59% of our billed accounts receivable at March 31, 2006, and 55 % of this balance is current. As of May 3, 2006, $1.9 million, or 59%, of the balances from these five customers has been collected. We expect that international telecommunication and internet service providers will continue to take longer to make payments than domestic customers.

Operating activities used $1.4 million and $1.2 million in cash during the nine months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The current year includes $2.6 million related to the increase in accounts receivable. Net cash used for investing activities was $845 thousand and $398 thousand, respectively. The current year includes $507 for fixed assets and $338 thousand for other assets. Financing activities generated cash of $650 thousand and $2.4 million during the nine months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, primarily related to borrowings on the line of credit and proceeds from exercise of stock options.

The Company has applied Statement 123(R) in our financial statements in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 using the modified-prospective-transition (MPT) method of adoption. Under this method, the Company’s prior periods do not reflect any restated amounts. The Company recognized $78,000 of compensation expense during the nine months ended March 31, 2006 as a result of the adoption of Statement 123(R). If Statement 123(R) had not been adopted, basic and diluted net income per share would have remained at $.02 per share and $.05 per share for the three months and nine months ended March 31, 2006, respectively. We will recognize expense of $99 thousand in fiscal 2006, $71 thousand in fiscal 2007, $20 thousand in fiscal 2008 and $2 thousand in fiscal 2009 associated with unvested awards not yet recognized.

Cost Containment Program

Although revenues increased during fiscal year 2006 and in fiscal year 2005, we have continued our cost containment measures which we implemented in 2003 and to a lesser extent in 2004 as a result of significant net losses from operations. We have maintained or reduced the number of full time employees during the past three fiscal years, excluding employees of Intasys. We have been carrying over these cost reduction measures to our 2helix acquisition as part of the integration of that company and we have completed the integration of 2helix. We expect to have increased costs and continuing liquidity demands in the future as we devote significant efforts to delivering products and services, supporting our customers under existing contracts and investing in new products. We also expect to add some additional head count in the sales and other areas to market and support our new products.

The following table summarizes contractual obligations and commitments as of March 31, 2006:


Contractual Obligation	Payments Due by Period
	(amounts in thousands)
	Total		Less than 1 year		1-3 years		4-5 years		After 5 years
Operating Leases	$	2,727	$	1,085	$	1,538	$	104	$	-0-

We have commercial commitments of two accounts receivable backed lines of credit discussed more fully below. One line of credit was renewed via an amended and restated loan and security agreement with the Bank on November 14, 2005. The outstanding balance at March 31, 2006, was $0.8 million. The other line of credit was opened on September 27, 2005. The outstanding balance on this line at March 31, 2006, was $1.0 million. Based on subsequent collections we have no outstanding borrowings under these lines of credit at April 20, 2006.

We also have issued standby letters of credit for security deposits for office space and to guarantee service contracts as summarized in the following table. The standby letters of credit have a one-year term and renew annually.


Other Commercial Commitments	Commitment Expiration Per Period (in thousands)
	Total Amounts
	Committed		Less than 1 year		1-3 years		4-5 years		Over 5 years
Standby Letters of Credit	$	484	$	331	$	153	$	-0-	$	-0-

Line of Credit

In November 14, 2005, we renewed our loan and security agreement and entered into an amended and restated loan and security agreement with Silicon Valley Bank. This amended agreement expires and is subject to renewal on November 13, 2006. Under this agreement, we may borrow based upon the amount of our approved borrowing base of eligible accounts receivable, up to a maximum of $3.5 million. The line of credit has sub limits of $500,000 for cash secured letters of credit and $1.75 million for U.S. Export Import Bank usage. We can draw up to 70% of our eligible accounts receivable under the master line and 70% of our eligible foreign accounts receivable under the U.S. Export Import Bank sub limit line. Amounts borrowed bear interest at a rate equal to the bank’s prime rate plus 1.75% per annum, charged on the average daily balance of advances outstanding, payable monthly and calculated on a 360 days per year basis. We also pay certain costs and expenses of the bank in administering the line. The receivables comprising the borrowing base must not be more than 90 days aged, must not be in dispute, and must conform to other eligibility requirements. The agreement has a monthly quick ratio covenant which must be complied with on an intra-quarterly basis, and a minimum tangible net worth covenant which must be complied with on a quarterly basis. The agreement also subjects the Company to non-financial covenants, including restrictions over dividends and certain reporting requirements.

We have an additional loan and security agreement which provides a second line of credit for the financing of non-standard accounts receivable. This new line expires and is subject to renewal on September 25, 2006. Under this second line, we may borrow based upon a borrowing base of specifically-approved accounts receivable not part of the borrowing base for our other line of credit, up to a maximum of $1.5 million. The line is administered under the specialty finance division of the Bank and its primary purpose is to allow financing for specific receivables with extended terms. We can draw up to 70% of approved accounts receivable under this new line. Amounts borrowed bear interest at a rate equal to the bank’s prime rate plus 2% per annum, charged on the outstanding financed gross receivable balance, calculated on a 360 day year basis, and payable upon the earlier of when the payment is received for the financed receivable or when the financed receivable is no longer an eligible receivable. We also pay certain costs and expenses of the bank in administering the line. The receivables comprising the borrowing base must not be more than 90 days aged, but financing for accounts receivable up to 180 days is available to the extent approved on a case-by-case basis by the Bank. All such receivables must not be in dispute, and must conform to other eligibility requirements. The agreement has no financial covenants, but does subject the Company to non-financial maintenance covenants, including restrictions over dividends.

ACE*COMM’s obligations under both agreements are secured by a security interest in all of our assets and intellectual property. Advances made to ACE*COMM are payable in full upon demand in the event of default under the agreement. As of

March 31, 2006, we had borrowings totaling $0.8 million on the $3.5 million line of credit and there was $31 thousand available for additional borrowing based on then-outstanding accounts receivable. As of March 31, 2006, we had borrowings of $1.0 million under the $1.5 million line of credit. Based on subsequent collections we had no outstanding borrowings under these lines of credit at April 20, 2006.

Under the terms of our corporate headquarters’ office lease, we maintain a letter of credit under our line of credit with our bank, which names the landlord as the sole beneficiary and which may be drawn on by the landlord in the event of a monetary default by us under the lease. The letter of credit currently required under the lease is $113 thousand, and will decrease annually each November through fiscal year 2008. We also maintain other customer related letters of credit issued by the Bank and secured under our line of credit to support specific terms and conditions of customer orders. The aggregate of these customer related letters of credit total approximately $484 thousand at March 31, 2006.

Liquidity Analysis

At March 31, 2006, we had cash and cash equivalents of $985 thousand. Our cash on hand has decreased and borrowings under our bank lines have increased from $1.6 million at June 30, 2005 to $1.8 million at March 31, 2006 and our accounts receivable have increased as a result of deliveries under existing contracts. However, our working capital has increased to $2.8 million at March 31, 2006, from $0.7 million at June 30, 2005, and accounts receivable increased $2.5 million to $7.4 million at March 31, 2006, while accounts payables decreased by $0.4 million to $0.9 million. Our liquidity situation has been improving as we have collected some of our accounts receivable in April, enabling us to repay all amounts outstanding under our lines of credit. However, we expect to continue to have significant liquidity demands during the remainder of the current fiscal year due to the nature of our existing contracts in backlog at March 31, 2006. We are continuing to manage our expenses to conserve cash and maintain adequate liquidity. We have no significant commitments for capital expenditures at March 31, 2006. We believe that existing consolidated cash balances reflecting the private financing in fiscal 2005, cash flows from operations, receipt of new contracts, and the availability of credit under our agreement with the Bank will support our working capital requirements for the next twelve months, based on our current expectations as to anticipated revenue, expenses and cash flow.

The Company is still pursuing a growth strategy that involves acquisitions and additional financing likely would be required for future acquisitions.

Risk Factors Affecting Future Operating Results

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q and the other documents we file with the SEC contain forward looking statements that are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about the industries to which we supply solutions and in which we operate, our beliefs and our management’s assumptions. In addition, other written or oral statements that constitute forward-looking statements may be made by or on behalf of us. Words such as ‘expects,’ ‘anticipates,’ ‘targets,’ ‘goals,’ ‘projects,’ ‘intends,’ ‘believes,’ ‘seeks,’ ‘estimates,’ variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecast in such forward-looking statements. Except as required under the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations of the SEC, we do not have the intention or obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements after the distribution of this Report on Form 10-Q, whether as a result of new information, future events, changes in assumptions, or otherwise.

The following items are representative of the risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could affect the outcome of the forward-looking statements.

Because of our reliance on significant customers and large orders, any failure to obtain a sufficient number of large contracts could have a material adverse effect on our revenues for one or more periods

A significant portion of our revenue comes from large financial commitments by a small number of customers, including both telecommunications carriers and large enterprises. We expect to continue to depend on a limited number of customers in any given period for a significant portion of our revenue and, in turn, to be dependent on their continuing success and positive financial results and condition. These large customers may result from one-time competitive procurements or from repeat purchases from distributors, OEMs or other strategic partners. We may not prevail in one or more of the procurements, and

our distributors may increase or suspend purchases of our products and services at any time. If we fail to continue to receive orders from such customers, or if any one or more of these customers suffers a downturn, our financial results will suffer. Our revenues and liquidity also may vary significantly from quarter to quarter based upon the delivery schedules of our large contracts, particularly extensions or delays in the delivery schedule arising from customer decisions or requirements.

Our products must be continuously updated to work with changing technology and demand for our products could be impacted by any competitors introducing more advanced technology

To maintain and improve demand for our products, we must continue to develop and introduce value-added, timely and cost effective new products, features and services that keep pace with technological developments and emerging industry standards. Any failure to do this will limit the market into which we can sell our products and services. We are presently introducing new software products and pursuing the development of others. These products have not yet achieved market acceptance. Further, customers are always looking for the most advanced technology available, within certain price ranges. To the extent that competitors can offer more advanced technology within a given price range our sales would be adversely affected. Further, customer technology upgrades can lead to sometimes lengthy delays in orders for our products until their system upgrades are complete and they are in a position to have our products installed as part of their new systems.

The adverse conditions in the telecommunications industry continue despite improvements in the economy and may continue to do so

Our business and financial results are highly dependent on the telecommunications industry and the capital spending of our customers. Over the past four or five years capital spending by telecommunication companies has been at reduced levels. Telecommunications products and services have increasingly become commodities that cannot easily be distinguished, leading to lower margins and reduced spending on costly software. The reduction of spending by companies in the telecommunication industries has caused, and may continue to cause, a significant reduction in our revenues. Although over the past fiscal year we experienced an increase in demand from certain types of customers, other areas of our business have experienced continued weakness in demand and unwillingness of customers to spend significant sums on procuring new Convergent Mediation™ or OSS solutions products or services.

Unless we continue to maintain existing strategic alliances and develop new ones, our sales will suffer

Our results could suffer further if we are unable to maintain existing and develop additional strategic alliances with leading providers of telecommunications services and network equipment who serve as distributors for our products. If we are not able to maintain these strategic alliances, we will not be able to expand our distribution channels and provide additional exposure for our product offerings. These relationships can take significant periods of time and work to develop, and may require the development of additional products or features or the offering of support services we do not presently offer. Failure to maintain particular relationships may limit our access to certain countries or geographic areas unless we are able to enter into new relationships with companies that can offer improved access.

Many of our telecommunications customers involve credit risks for us

Many of our customers present potential credit risks, and we are dependent on a small number of major customers. The majority of our customers are in the telecommunication services industry and government sector, or are in the early stages of development when financial resources may be limited. Five customers represented 61% of our gross trade receivables balance as of March 31, 2006. Because we depend on a small number of major customers, and many of our customers present potential credit risks for different reasons, our results of operations could be adversely affected by non-payment or slow-payment of receivables. We have also experienced losses from doubtful accounts. For a more detailed discussion of doubtful accounts please read the section labeled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Allowance for Bad Debts.” Several of our international customers have negotiated extended payment terms, further separating the time payment is received from when costs are incurred.

We have experienced liquidity demands as a result of large contracts

We have been experiencing increased costs and liquidity demands during the current fiscal year as we have devoted significant effort to delivering products and services and supporting our customers under our existing contracts. Although these increased

liquidity demands have started to subside as we have collected initial amounts generated under these contracts and repaid the outstanding borrowings under our lines of credit, we expect this situation to continue for a while.

We are dependent on our ability to borrow

We are dependent on our ability to borrow funds under our lines of credit. Any inability to borrow could have a material adverse effect on the Company. Additionally, our borrowings under our lines of credit are dependent upon our eligible and approved accounts receivable. In the event of an inability to borrow, we would require additional financing and the additional financing may not be available or may not be available on terms acceptable to us. The amounts of borrowings under our lines of credit have been increasing as a result of our liquidity demands, discussed in the prior paragraph, to $1.8 million as of March 31, 2006. There were no outstanding borrowings at April 20, 2006 as a result of collections under certain contracts.

We are increasingly subject to the risks and costs of international sales, and failure to manage these risks would have an adverse effect on us

A substantial portion of our revenues are derived from international sales and are therefore subject to the risks of conducting business overseas, including the general economic conditions in each country, the overlap of different tax structures, the difficulty in managing resources in various countries, changes in regulatory requirements, compliance with a variety of foreign laws and regulations, foreign currency translations and longer payment cycles. We derived approximately $3.5 million, or 52%, of our total revenue and $2.7 million, or 71%, from customers outside of the United States for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. We derived $11.7 million, or 58% of total revenue and $9.3 million, or 70% of total revenue from customers outside of the United States for the nine months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. To the extent that we have increased our international revenue sources over the last three years, the impact of the risks related to international sales could have an increasingly larger effect on our financial condition as a whole.

Failure to manage risks of potential acquisitions would have an adverse effect on us

We have completed three significant acquisitions over the past two and half years, and pursuing additional acquisitions to expand our product line remains part of our growth plan. However, acquisitions involve a number of potential adverse consequences. In particular, failure to identify or evaluate risks such as possible loss of major customers, or inability to correctly evaluate costs of combining businesses or technologies have in the past and in the future could cost us significant resources, dilution to our stockholders or loss of valuable time. In addition, recent acquisitions have included expenses associated with in process research and development and require us to absorb the cost of completion of ongoing product development. Failure to complete product development on time and within projected cost estimates would have an adverse affect on operating results and potentially decrease the value of the acquisition. Acquisitions may require additional financing and the additional financing may not be available or may not be available on terms acceptable to us.

Continuing market consolidation may reduce the number of potential customers for our products

The North American communications industry has experienced significant consolidation. In the future, there may be fewer potential customers requiring operations support systems and related services, increasing the level of competition in the industry. In addition, larger, consolidated communication companies have strengthened their purchasing power, which could create a decline in our pricing structure and a decrease of the margins we can realize. These larger consolidated companies are also striving to streamline their operations by combining different communications systems and the related operations support systems into one system, reducing the number of vendors needed. The continuing industry consolidation may cause us to lose more customers, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Market consolidation within the UK service provider market has reduced the number of customers for our products and has begun to erode our existing customer base within this group. Failure to replace these customers will have a negative impact upon future operating results.

Failure to estimate accurately the resources necessary to complete fixed-price contracts would have an adverse effect on our bottom line

Our failure to accurately estimate the resources required for a project or a failure to complete contractual obligations in a manner consistent with the projected plan may result in lower than expected project margins or project losses, which would negatively impact operating results. Our sales are formalized in agreements that may include customization of the underlying

software and services. These agreements require projections related to allocation of employees and other resources. Additionally, we may fix the price of an arrangement before the final requirements are finalized. On occasion, we have and may be required in the future to commit unanticipated additional resources to complete projects, and the estimated fixed price may not include this unanticipated increase of resources. If our original projections are not met, project losses may occur that would have a negative impact on our operating results.

Inability to forecast revenue accurately may result in costs that are out of line with revenues, leading either to additional losses or downsizing that may not have been necessary

We may not be able to accurately forecast the timing of our revenue recognition due to the difficulty of anticipating compliance with the accounting requirements for revenue recognition and to the fact that we historically have generated a disproportionate amount of our operating revenues toward the end of each quarter. Our operating results historically have varied from fiscal period to fiscal period. Accordingly, our financial results in any particular fiscal period are not necessarily indicative of results for future periods.

ITEM 3 QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are exposed to interest rate risk related to any borrowings under our line of credit. As of March 31, 2006, borrowings outstanding under our line of credit were approximately $1.8 million. Our market risk sensitive instruments do not expose us to material market risk exposures. Should interest rates increase or decrease 1%, interest expense would increase or decrease $18 thousand based on our borrowings as of March 31, 2006.

ITEM 4 CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) (the “Exchange Act”) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

There was no change in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II: OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 6

EXHIBITS

(a) Exhibits


Exhibit 31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32		Certifications Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Part I — Financial Information

Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2006 (Unaudited) and June 30, 2005			3

Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005			4

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) for the nine months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005			5

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)			6

Item 2 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition			15

Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk			28

Item 4 Controls and Procedures			28

Part II — Other Information

Item 6 Exhibits			28

Signatures

Certifications


	ACE*COMM CORPORATION

May 5, 2006	By	/s/George T. Jimenez

		George T. Jimenez
		Chief Executive Officer

		/s/Steven R. Delmar

		Steven R. Delmar
		Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial Officer)