XML 32 R23.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.21.4
Fair Value Measures and Disclosures (Policies)
6 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2021
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Policy
Items Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis
From time to time, the Company enters into certain strategic investments for the promotion of business and strategic objectives, which are accounted for either under the equity method or the measurement alternative. If measured at fair value in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, these investments would generally be classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
For the investments that are accounted for under the equity method, the Company recorded an immaterial gain and a net gain of $3 million for the three and six months ended December 31, 2021, respectively. The Company recorded a net gain of $1 million and an immaterial gain for the three and six months ended January 1, 2021, respectively. The adjusted carrying value of the investments accounted for under the equity method amounted to $81 million and $78 million as of December 31, 2021 and July 2, 2021, respectively.
For the investments that are accounted for under the measurement alternative, the Company recorded a net loss of $2 million and a net gain of $4 million for the three and six months ended December 31, 2021, respectively. The Company recorded a net loss of $7 million and a net gain of $16 million for the three and six months ended January 1, 2021, respectively, related to downward and upward adjustments due to observable price changes. As of December 31, 2021 and July 2, 2021, the carrying value of the Company’s strategic investments under the measurement alternative was $88 million and $117 million, respectively.
Fair Value Measurement, Policy
Measurement of Fair Value
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required to be recorded at fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact, and it considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability.
Fair Value Hierarchy
A fair value hierarchy is based on whether the market participant assumptions used in determining fair value are obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) or reflect the Company’s own assumptions of market participant valuation (unobservable inputs). A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value are:
Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets that are unadjusted and accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;
Level 2 — Quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in markets that are inactive; quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or financial instruments for which significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly; or
Level 3 — Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.
The Company considers an active market to be one in which transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis and views an inactive market as one in which there are few transactions for the asset or liability, the prices are not current, or price quotations vary substantially either over time or among market makers. Where appropriate, the Company’s or the counterparty’s non-performance risk is considered in determining the fair values of liabilities and assets, respectively.